►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Common.July.16.2019
Description
CHAOSS.Common.July.16.2019
A
There
are
a
couple
things
that
came
up:
Kevin
put
out
an
email
yesterday
about
trying
to
create
consistency
across
the
metrics,
and
it's
just
in
terms
of
the
headings
that
are
being
used
by
the
metrics,
because
I
think
there,
as
Kevin
pointed
out,
I,
think
they're
quite
similar.
It's
just
it
would
be
nice
to
if
they
were
all
consistently
named
so
I
think
it
comes
down.
I
went
through
all
of
the
candidate
metrics
and
I
think
it
comes
down
to
just
a
couple
things,
so
the
I'll
work
up
from
the
bottom.
A
So
in
some
of
the
metrics,
like
the
ones
you
have
Andy
and
value
thought
of
category
is
called
references
like
a
literature
and
in
other
cases
that's
called
resources
yeah,
and
so
it
would
to
me
and
I
think
Kevin
and
Shawn
and
the
other
people
that
chimed
did.
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense
just
to
call
that
the
same
thing,
of
course
yeah
and
so
I
was
thinking
about
it
today.
I'm
actually
I
actually
have
a
preference
towards
resources.
Okay,
what
do
you
think
Kevin?
B
A
I
think
resources
covers
literature
and
potential
like
websites
and
it's
just
a
more
inclusive
world.
So
are
we
all
kind
of
okay
on
that
one,
so
I'm
gonna
ask
my
partner
in
crime
here
Shawn,
take
notes,
I'm
ready
to
well
into
let's
just
issue
some
pull
requests,
okay,
so
for
which
you're
gonna
start
with
an
attempt
for
each
of
the
ones.
So
can
you
just
go
into
value
Kevin
your
Internet's,
really
bad.
B
A
A
C
C
A
Yes
and
so
scroll
up
a
little
bit
or
whatever
down
so
that
just
becomes
resources.
Okay
before
you
and
then
before
you
issue
this
pull
request.
There's
another
is
Andy
gonna.
Do
the
other
nevermind
I'm
gonna
have
Sean.
Do
this
pull
request?
Yes,
that's
fine,
because
then
you
can
merge
it.
That
sounds
great
I'm
ready
to
merge.
Okay,
and
so
then
the
other
issue
is
so.
This
becomes
one
external
references
just
becomes
resources
in
all
cases.
A
A
couple
things
in
here,
the
other
is,
you
know
you
have
not
you,
but
how
a
lot
of
them
have
test
cases
and
then,
in
parentheses
it
says
examples:
I
propose
we
get
rid
of
the
in
parentheses,
and
this
call
it
test
case
or
just
call
it
test
cases
or
call
it
examples.
One
I
don't
know
that
we
need
two
words
for
well.
There.
E
A
A
A
Cases
currents.
These
examples
becomes
examples.
We
don't
need
I'm,
not
a
huge
fan
of
using
towards,
if
we
can't
say
it
right,
the
first
time.
Why
do
we
get
a
first
disease
to
say
it
and
then
the
top
one
number
two
okay,
which
is
currently
called
use
cases
becomes
objectives,
is
that
it
yeah
I,
think
that
so
those
three
and
so
issued
that
pull
request.
Well,.
E
A
A
Yes,
do
you
get
that
Andy,
you're,
muted,
I?
Think
Jesus
your
bid,
yeah?
My
comment
is
awesome.
Okay,
so
he's
currently
doing
that?
Okay,
so
then,
basically
we
do
the
I
think
we
do
the
exact
same
thing
for
risk.
We
don't
have
to
do
it
a
phone
here,
but
we
fund
a
little
bit
of
time
issuing
one
pull
request
that
cleans
up
those
resources,
objectives.
E
A
A
E
Differently
and
matrix,
so
the
question
right
now
is:
we
have
sample,
implement
or
notable
innovations
at
end
well
as
test
cases.
Examples
and
are
those
different
things
like
in
the
the
one
that
I'm
looking
at
on
value
it
they're
one
examples
is
a
bit
more
granular
underneath
we
should
take
a
look
at
how
it's
used
I.
Think.
A
Before
we
solve
this
problem,
can
we
take
care
of
the
other
headings?
Seen
I'm
saying
will
like
get
those
in
as
one
pull
request
or
and
then
possibly
even
a
cue
to
talk
about.
You
can
continue
the
discussion.
I
just
do
these
changes,
okay
and
then
so
this
has
to
happen
on
risk
as
well.
So
just
so
you
know,
there's
gonna
be
a
pull
request
issued
in
risk
working
group
and
then
so
then,
the
last
one
and
I'm
gonna
bring
this
one
up
for
people
here.
It's
the
measure
of
my
screen.
It's
for
evolution.
E
A
A
Right
so
if
I
I'm
looking
at
this
is
evolution
well,
there's
code
changes
I'm,
just
picking
on
the
first
metric
here.
So
if
you
see,
can
you
see
this?
It
says
description
and
then
it's
a
specific
description.
I
think
this
needs
to
be
a
subheading
of
description,
so
I
think
it
just
needs
to
be
added.
I
need
a
pound.
Sign
needs
to
be
added
to
this
thing.
A
Use
cases
with
likewise
be
changed
to
objectives.
They
have
removed
filters
and
visualizations
in
weddings.
I,
actually
think
these
should
be
moved
back
into
one,
and
subheadings
should
be
provided,
for
these
are
the
proposed
filters.
These
are
proposed
polarizations,
just
because
right
now,
it's
two
headings,
so
this
should
go
back
to
filters
and
visualizations
as
one
heading
and
then,
if
they
want
to
break
it
out,
we
could
do
some
headings
in
here.
Write
reference,
implementations
would
stay
known
implement.
Is
that
correct?
A
A
A
A
D
D
H
A
D
H
A
A
Anything
else
on
the
headings,
so
thanks
for
catching
that
Kevin
and
just
yeah
I
think
this
will
be
nice
and
then
then,
ultimately,
there
are
actually
two
different
templates
that
are
out
there
and
I
am
okay
with
that
they're
pretty
much
in
line
with
one
another,
generally
speaking,
but
I
just
think
different
metrics
from
different
working
groups,
kind
of
require
different
ways
of
articulating
those
and
so
I'm.
Okay,
with
that
and
I,
think
these
two
templates
capture
those
things.
The
other
thing
is
Andy.
A
A
So
right
now
the
to
that.
So
the
two
that
happened
last
or
two
weeks
ago
were
labor
investment,
yeah
the
two
with
labor
investment
and
I
think
the
two
are
living
wage.
Maybe
was
that
sorry
yeah,
those
are
the
two
remaining
yes
yeah.
They
just
were
at
least
on
the
talk
on
Friday.
There
wasn't
a
sense
that
they
were
worked
out
enough,
I,
see
and
so
I
mean,
if
there's
still
time,
of
course,
but
that's
the
current
and
in
it's
it's
there's
no
set
a
number
of
of
metrics
that
need
to
come.
A
C
So
my
reaction
is
personally:
I
really
would
like
to
include
those
metrics
okay
and
if
it
would
be
okay,
maybe
we
could
take
another
crack
at
it
on
Friday.
Let
me
let
me
read
the
notes
and
let
me
see
if
I
can
assemble
some
arguments
and
some
clarity
around
it.
Great
long
and
and
the
reason
why
is
when
we
talk
about
the
value
of
you
know
the
two
main
stakeholders,
in
my
opinion,
for
these
metrics
are
number
one:
the
open
source
program,
office
and
number
two.
C
C
A
C
C
A
F
A
A
E
G
E
G
G
A
A
Well,
we
I
think,
based
on
the
conversation
last
couple
days,
we've
been
spending
some
time
digging
through
the
templates.
None
of
them
just
so
you
all
know
need
we're
not
asking
for
any
changes
in
any
of
the
content
at
all.
So
any
any
of
the
work
on
the
metrics
themselves
have
I.
Think
that's
been
pretty
well
discussed
her
like
that.
It's
really
just
presentation
of
that
stuff.
A
A
D
A
G
A
G
A
I
mean
just
so
other
people
know
too,
as
well.
There's
kind
of
an
open
call,
so
right
now
the
Genna
preempted
a
little
bit
that
we
have
the
cast
project
or
project
will
handle
and
that
we
would
start
using
the
hash
tagging
for
hash
tags
for
the
different
working
groups
yeah,
and
if
people
have
an
expressed
interest
in
wanting
took
to
tweet
under
that
account
tweet
under
that
account,
you.
E
A
I
G
G
A
Work,
just
fine
I
think
you
got
I,
think
you
had
about
three
or
four
people
commenting
out
the
document
and
giving
alright
cool.
Thank
you
on
that
and
then
also
just
so.
People
know
to
here
on
the
list.
Jones
put
together
a
constituent
document
which
is
really
trying
to
think
about.
Who
would
be
me
if
I'm
wrong
John,
who
those
consumers
of
the
metrics
would
be
and
what
our
work
means:
I'm,
leaving
the
world
of
chaos,
yeah.
G
I'm
kind
of
looking
at
it
from
the
lens
of
you
know,
I
mean
I,
do
like
hiring
and
firing
and
budgets
and
like
why
do
I
care
about
these
metrics?
You
know,
we've
all
I
know
a
lot
of
you
have
had
those
projects
and
I
certainly
have
where
it's
like
I
tracked,
four
hundred
different
metrics
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
only
three
of
them
matter
so
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
G
D
A
B
I
G
A
C
C
F
E
E
We're
under
there
right
now
is
we
had
a
lot
of
work
done
in
development
that
isn't
yet
urged
mascar,
because
we
fund
we
are
going
to
the
project.
Okay,
you
know
with
the
common
schema
and
bringing
a
lot
of
things
that
were
being
brought
in
from
outside
tools
into
our
schema
natively
and
serving
them
up
through
one
restful
api.
We,
we
change
the
architecture
a
lot
and
it's
it's.
E
We
have
a
lot
more
data
now
and
it's
all
in
one
schema,
so
I
think
we're
I
would
say
we're
about
two
weeks
out
from
being
a
place
where
adding
a
docker
container
would
be
the
right
time
that
okay,
however,
there
is
a
docker
container
of
the
current
version
of
master,
which
is
what
is
deploying
under
valued
at
Agra,
left
IO
right
now,
so
we
have
a
docker
container
for
the
current
master
branch.
There
will
be
a
new
docker
container,
no
Louise.
C
Well,
for
I
would
say
for
for
ardor
generally,
okay,
and
so
presumably
it
would
be
configurable
such
that
you
could
tell
which
repos
and
you
know
which,
which
things
to
track
it
seems
like.
It
is:
oh,
okay,
so
my
third,
my
third
question
is
I'd
like
to
start
getting
visibility
into
the
results
of
the
nodes
survey.
C
C
A
A
lot
of
work-
and
there
was
a
recent
survey
from
the
to
do
group-
did
you
see
this
one
I
did
I
did
see
that
going
around?
Yes,
we
did
some
mapping
on
that.
Just
to
make
sure
we
weren't
kind
of
crossing
paths
and
I
think
we're
pretty
pretty
good
in
that
regard.
I
think
our
big
question
right
now
is
the
distribution
of
the
survey
and
how
we
go
about
doing
that,
because
this
is
really
a
research
project.
This
isn't
coming
from
chaos.
Yes,.
C
A
C
A
Said
this
isn't
a
I,
don't
see
this
as
a
chaos,
I
think
if
we
were
gonna
really
do
this
as
a
chaos
initiative,
then
we
have
to
be
a
bit
more
formal
with
it
and
probably
ask
the
board.
I
say
we
can
distribute
it
as
a
chaos
project,
and
this
is
directly
related
to
the
research
that
Vinod
is
doing.
Gancho
I'd.