►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Common.Jan.23.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Common.Jan.23.2020
A
All
right
welcome
to
the
common
metrics
working
group
meeting
for
the
chaos
project
for
January
23rd.
So
today
we
have
a
few
things
on
the
agenda:
we'll
look
at
the
open
pool,
requests
and
issues.
Although
I
took
a
look,
I
haven't
looked
today,
but
I
don't
think
there
was
much
new
there
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
get
all
of
the
changes
requested
and
get
those
PR
10,
because
I
think
there
are
a
couple
that
I
don't
have
yet
that
are
related
to
the
asks
from
grammaire
lab
and
auger.
A
A
Different
computer
have
to
sign
in
requires
additional
authentication,
sorry
give
it
a
minute,
I'll
sign
in
and
then
we'll
I'll
take
a
look.
I'll
share
my
screen.
Oh
my
phone.
Just
crashed
all
right,
so
forget
that
literally
my
phone
just
shut
itself
off
and
rebooted,
and
that
has
my
two
factor
authentication
on
it.
A
A
Which
we,
if
we
don't
get
anything
specific
for
either
of
them,
then
I
think
that's
what
we
should
just
do,
but
if
they
have
any,
if
they
have
anything
more
specific
that
they
want
us
to
use,
that
would
be
I
mean
I,
always
think
it's
better.
If
you
can
link
to
something
useful
where
people
don't
have
to
kind
of
dig
through
I.
C
A
B
A
A
B
B
B
A
C
A
D
A
A
A
B
B
C
A
A
Because
we
felt
that
so
I
know
what
we're
trying
to
get
at
we're
trying
to
get
at.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
get
information
about
the
contributors
that
don't
show
up,
and
things
like
trace
data
right,
but
the
interview
question
who
do
use
who
do
you
see
are
the
most
important
contributors
in
the
project
is
sort
of
a
value
or
judgment,
and,
and
none
of
us
could
come
up
with
anything
that
we
liked
better.
A
E
F
Is
just
just
because
I've
obviously
not
been
very,
very
close
to
this
is,
is
the
aim
here
to
try
to
identify
to
not
just
sort
of
use
the
commit
data
to
identify
like
who
are
sort
of
the
key
people,
but
trying
to
look
at
sort
of,
like
other
points,
to
to
really
see
that
so
in
case
you're,
seeing
like
someone
who
maybe
they've
not
done
like
a
ton
of
code,
commits
really
active
on
the
mailing
list.
They're
really
active
in
other
areas
like
if
they
went
away,
the
whole
ship
would
fall
apart.
A
Exactly
so,
if
you
think
of
even
like,
even
if
you
think,
of
the
chaos
project,
so
we
do
a
lot
of
work
in
Google
Docs,
where
there
are
a
number
of
people
who
provide
really
great
feedback.
So
people
like
like
Nicola
huesemann,
but
she
doesn't
tend
to
be
the
person
who
submits
the
pull
request,
but
she
may
have
been
the
person
who
did
the
most
work
on
the
on
the
metric
itself,
and
so
that
doesn't
show
up
in
the
and
the
github
stats.
And
we
have.
F
So
is
the
idea
that
we
want
to
is
the
idea
of
the
interview
to
sort
of
identify
like
who,
if,
if
you'd
look
at
the
contribute,
if
you'd
look
at
sort
of
like
the
top
contributor
list
and
who
and
who
would
you
is
more
of
like
a
question
of
like
who's
missing
from
there?
That,
like
we
couldn't
capture
with
already
existing
data,
yeah.
F
F
E
F
And
I
think
probably
from
like
getting
quantifiable
data,
that's
probably
the
right
approach,
I'm,
just
sort
of
wondering-
and
maybe
maybe
we're
kind
of
like
digging
too
much
into
a
chasm
here.
I
was
like
you
know.
Maybe
developer
doesn't
know
like
the
events
person,
that's
dealing
with
this
or
can't
like
identify
by
name,
but
they
could
identify
by
role
or
something
or
maybe
I'm
overthinking.
It
too.
Maybe.
B
B
A
D
D
C
E
B
C
Description:
I
like
it,
we
could
maybe
just
change
the
order
of
this
sentence
and
then
just
add
one
more.
We
can
start
with
a
contributor
is
defined
as
anyone
who
contributes
to
the
project
in
any
way,
and
then
we
could
have
a
a
sentence
that,
or
we
could
just
add
a
add
a
little
bit
to
this
other
sentence.
This
metrics
this
metric
is
a
is
an
indication
of
the
number
of
contributors
and
the
types
of
contributors
that
a
project
has.
B
B
Well,
the
question
that
Brian
asks
is
describing
how
you
get
from
the
individual
to
determining
their
type
confucian
and
so
I
think
the
how
questions
those
are
answered
by
the
interview
questions
so
how
things
so
I
actually
don't
have
a
problem.
Personally
with
the
description,
if
you
flip
the
sentences
I'm
fine
with
that,
but
if
we
actually
add
it
to
the
description,
how
we
determine
the
type
of
contributions
to
be
made,
that's
a
bit
of
a
method
as
to
how
that
gets
done,
which
I
think
is
handled
down
below
I.
Think.
A
A
Think
the
idea
is
that
what
the
bit
we
need
to
add
to
the
description
is
something
around
how
this
metric
is
really
designed
to
make
sure
that
you're,
not
forgetting
people
that
you're,
including
all
of
the
people,
and
that
you're
not
just
focused
on
kind
of
the
trace
data,
so
I
feel
like
maybe
one
more
sentence
in
the
description
is
probably
probably
what
we
need.
I'm,
not
doing
a
very
good
job
of
coming
up
with
one,
however,
I
think.
A
C
C
B
A
E
E
F
F
So
that
you
I
don't
know
if
it
fits
perfectly
I
for
the
contributor
and
I
know.
If
you
click
on
on
the
side
where
it
says
individual
there,
you
get
an
individual
breakdown
and
then
a
chart.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
sort
of
the
same
thing
or
after
or
if
that's
off
I
was
just
I
figured
I'd
leave
before
a
discussion.
If
y'all
think
it
fits
that's
fine,
if
not
no
biggie,
either
way.
F
And
it
does
break
down
also
for
the
project
management,
so
like
issues
and
stuff,
so
you
can
capture
like
who's
the
most
active
doing
issues.
This
is
not
as
super
active
projects,
it's
not
probably
the
greatest
visualization
they're.
Normally
the
communication
works
is
too,
but
that
seems
to
be
broken
now
for
some
reason,
some
reason
I'll
leave
it
to
the
group.
I
mean
I,
find
either
way.
I
just
figure
I
just
throw
that
up.
There.
B
B
E
F
D
F
F
Either
way,
I
mean
I'm
fine
with
that,
if
that's
the
easier
thing
I
mean
it
may
be
just
a
couple.
Instructions
I
think
for
this.
One
particular
you'd
want
to
click
and
show
the
individual
versus
the
organizational
and
I
don't
know.
If
we
have
a
street
I
can
play
with
it
and
see
if
we
have
a
straight
link
to
it,
I
think.
C
B
B
F
E
F
E
E
E
B
F
B
D
B
B
C
D
D
B
C
F
B
D
B
So
a
lot
of
you
who
know
that
one
of
my
things
that
I
think
about
across
the
entire
chaos
project
is
how
we
make
sure
that
the
work
and
the
working
groups
is
represented
in
kind
of
the
applied
ways
right.
So
how
can
we
see
these
metrics
is
very
visual
deployments
in
the
world
that
are
actually
making
a
difference
so,
whether
it's
in
our
room
or
lab
or
the
DNI
badging
or
whatever
it
might
be,
and
so
common
is
a
bit
of
a
funnier
one
right.
B
A
B
B
So
how
do
we
express
like
to
be
like
something
like
how
do
we
say
thanks
common
for
all
the
work
you've
done
here?
Here's
here's
that
work
represented
in
the
world
right
so
like.
If
we
do
the
DNI
badging
thing,
it's
pretty
easy
to
say
thanks,
DNA
group,
here's,
the
stuff,
that's
actually
trying
to
drive
forward
and
make
change
in
the
world
or
if
it's
not
a
value
like
when
Kevin
was
talking
about
the
value
perspectives.
If
there's
a
dashboard,
you
know
thanks
valued
working
group,
here's
also
working
to
deploy
those
metrics.
C
B
C
A
A
D
B
B
B
A
F
A
F
D
A
A
I
think
if
so,
let's
look
at
the
definitions
again
for
for
the
focus
areas,
because
where
is
let's
see
understand
where
contributors
from
organizations
that
people
are
happening,
that
should
be
where
contributions
from
organizations
that
people
are
happening
so
I
think
where
is
more
about
the
like?
Is
it
happening
on
github?
Is
it
happening
in
IRC?
E
A
F
A
B
E
A
A
A
Spreadsheet
I'm,
sorry,
but
because
drop
we're
dropping
links
in
the
chat,
but
we
really
need
to
be
dropping
links
in
the
notes,
because
the
chat
goes
away
as
soon
as
we
close
soon
so
I
just
found
the
tracking
spreadsheet
link.
Oh
fix
that,
okay
and
then
what
I
was
gonna
do
is
copy
the
because
we
have
a
starting
point.
I'm.
A
A
B
A
A
A
C
C
A
C
A
A
A
E
C
C
C
B
E
C
E
C
A
D
A
A
A
Yeah
just
see
what
their,
what
their
suggestions
are
for
handling
the
duplication.
I
mean:
do
we
want
to
just
merge
these
do
want
to
leave
it
under
evolution.
Do
we
want
to
leave
it
under
common?
Is
it
too
late
to
do
anything
now,
since
we're
almost
ready
to
release
it,
and
it
seems
like
we
could
merge,
probably
merged
that
you
take
the
best
of
all
right.
A
A
C
C
A
Say
if
you're
volunteering
to
do
the
email
I
would
say
send
it.
However,
you
think
is
the
best
gonna
reach
the
evolution,
books
cuz,
to
be
honest,
I,
just
don't
work
a
lot
with
that
that
working
groups
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know
how
they
tend
to
work.
I
would
say:
do
it
ever
you
think
it's
best
I
think.