►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Common Working Group 6-10-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
lot
of
people
with
action
items
mysteriously
aren't
in
the
meeting.
How
convenient
I'll
see
you
we'll
we'll
see
who
joins
well,
but
we'll
we'll
start
by
running
through
the
action
items
for
the
meetings.
A
I
pulled
the
action
items
into
the
agenda
just
to
make
it
easier,
so
sean
was
to
work
on
smoothing
out
the
time
waiting
for
submitter
action
metric.
So
I'm
not
sure
that's
done
daniel
was
going
to
do
a
review
of
the
collaboration
platforms.
A
Matt
g
who's
out
this
week
was
going
to
work
more
on
the
bots
and
shawn
was
going
to
pr
the
language
distribution
as
a
release.
Candidate
for
review
kevin
do,
you
know,
did
sean
actually
pr
that.
A
A
There
are
no
nuclear
requests
review
either
and
I
think
we
we
talked
about
the
drive-through
contributors
a
little
bit
last
week,
but
we
said
that
we
probably
needed
georg
and
justin
to
have
a
more
thorough
discussion
of
that
one.
So
we'll
probably
wait
standard
structure
for
the
readme
in
each
working
group
repo.
I
believe
that
this
is
done.
A
Okay,
so
I
am
gonna
go
ahead
and
close
this
issue,
one
less
issue
for
us
to
think
about
which
is
always
good.
A
A
Was
this?
Was
this
something
that
matt
g
you
wanted
to
talk
about.
C
That's
just
for
the
working
groups
to
reflect
on
their
focus
areas.
B
C
Maybe
make
some
decisions
on
restructuring
if
necessary,
so
it's
nothing
has
to
be
done
if
we
feel
that
the
focus
series
are
fine
in
common,
it's
just
a
just
a
point
to
reflect
on.
A
I
think
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
just
pump
that
to
well.
We
don't
have
a
meeting
next
week
next
meeting
so
that
we
can
have
that
discussion
with
with
matt
when
he'll
be
back,
because
I
think
that
that's
I'm
just
looking
around.
We
we're
missing
a
few
of
the
key
people
from
the
that
normally
attend
these
meetings.
So
we
probably
want
to
kick
that
discussion
to
the
next
meeting.
So
I'll.
Add
that
to
the
agenda
for
the
next
meeting.
A
A
Crickets
crickets,
I
just
I'll
assume
that
nobody
has
any
anything
new
to
add
to
this.
Like
I
said
we
did
a
pretty
good
scrub
of
it
last
last
meeting,
so
I
think,
we're
probably
probably
in
pretty
good
shape
unless
anybody.
D
A
I
think
that
this
first
one
because
sean
was
working
on
it.
We
probably
want
to
wait
for
him
to
do
the
review,
who
was
working
on
a
space
of
that.
A
Location,
oh,
that's
matt,
matt,
okay,
so
I
probably
won't
wait
to
talk
about
that.
One
too
collaboration
platforms,
this
one
that
one
is.
C
That
one
is
it's
pretty
close
to
ready
to
go.
We
were
just
we're
just
waiting
on
a
final
review
from
daniel
on
it
and
the
reason
we
wanted
daniel
to
take
a
peek
at
it
is
because
this
is
actually
based
on
something
from
grimoire
lab.
C
C
It
we
could
push
it
through
and
resolve
any
issues
we
have
with
it
in
the
review
process.
A
I
tend
to
prefer
that
the
to
have
the
person
I
really
wish
it
wouldn't
give
me
these
suggested
action
items,
because
I
always
wanted
to
suggest
people.
I
work
with
to
do
action
items
and
this
is
not
not
helpful.
A
I
I
tend
to
have
a
preference
for
the
person
who
did
the
most
work
on
it,
getting
the
first
opportunity
to
submit
the
pr
just
making
sure
that
people
get
credit
credit
where
credit's
due
so
so,
rather
than
submitting
it
on
our
own,
without
without
daniel
I'd,
prefer
to
have
daniel
to
do
his
review
and
either
submit
the
pr
or
say
hey.
I
don't
have
time
I'd
like
someone
else
to
do
it.
C
Just
to
be
clear,
I
did
I
took
the
lead
on
this
metric.
Oh
so
he
it's
not
a
metric
that
he
has
done
the
most
work
on
it
is.
It
is
purely
a
because
the
metric
is
kind
of
based
on
a
gremore
lab
metric
or
a
gremore
lab
dashboard
that
we'd
like
to
give
his
feedback
on.
A
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna
give
you
the
action
item
to
submit
that
vr,
then
and
put
it
into
the
review
process
so
that
we
can
just
get
it,
get
it
out
there,
and
then
we
can
get
feedback
from
from
daniel
and
georg
and
some
of
the
other
people.
From
from
that
team.
A
C
No
problem,
no,
no,
no
worries.
I
think
we,
I
think
we
were
pushing
that
one
through
during
a
period
where
I
think
you're
away
for
a
few
meetings.
A
D
A
I
wonder
did
where
was
that.
A
C
That
was
probably
just
copied
from
a
from
an
from
a
previous
release:
candidate
just
to
grab
the
text.
E
C
That
should
be
that
313
actually
should
be
a
link
to
the
to
the
issue
as
well,
so
it
was
probably
just
copied
actually
from
the
website.
Okay,.
A
A
A
This
could
be
a
really
short
efficient
meeting
today.
Does
anybody
else
have
anything
that
we
want
to
talk
about?
Do
we
want
to
talk
about
the
focus
areas
since
we
have
some
some
time
or
do
we
want
to
wait
on
that
discussion
until
matt
g
gets
back.
F
If
you
have
any
yeah,
I
feel
like
matt
would
have
some
some
opinions
and
thoughts
on
it.
So
if,
if
no
one
else
cares
to
wait,
I
would
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
wait
just
so
he
can
be
a
part
of
that
conversation.
D
A
Are
there,
let
me
ask
a
different
question:
are
there
any
metrics
that
anyone
here
would
like
to
to
work
on
that
aren't
yet
started?
I
don't
know
if
people
have
some
some
time
to
pick
up
a
metric,
we
do
have
some
on
the
spreadsheet
that
are
still
in
the
probably
still
in
the
considering
phase
some
around
clones
and
downloads.
C
By
the
way,
the
that
the
focus
area
reflection
that
that's
a
task
that
please
ask
every
working
group
to
to
think
about,
so
not
not
just
this
working
group
yeah,
so
he
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
here.
It's
just
kind
of
a
for
the
working
group
to
reflect
on
I'm
I'm
not
sure
he
has
insight
into
how
common
should
change.
A
A
G
G
G
I
I
was
just
reading
the
metrics,
which
one
on
left
I
can
work
on
any
of
these.
Whichever
is
available
like
even
look,
is
any
work
done
on
the
even
location.
G
So
I'll
pick
then
clones,
which
is
technical
folks
and
I
have
worked
on
the
technical
so
which
is
very
related.
A
Okay,
that
would
be.
That
would
be
great.
So
if
you
want
to
create
an
issue
for
it
and
a
doc,
that
would
be
a
good,
a
good
first
start.
G
A
Okay,
with
that
do
we
have
do.
We
have
anything
else
that
we
need
to
talk
about
in
this
meeting.
E
E
I
was
opening
them
because
yeah
these
are
new.
For
me
I
was
a
bit
disconnected
so
I
was
looking
at
these
metrics
and
that's
why
I've
seen
that
it
was
this
issue
with
the
link
which
one
was
incorrect
role:
22
global
inclusion,
it's
a
copy
based
from
the
bandwidth
rather
than
a
global
inclusion
document.