►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.February.18.2019
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.February.18.2019
A
C
A
D
D
B
A
D
A
F
D
A
A
F
Maybe
we
put
together
sort
of
what
would
be
some
potential
questions
and
topics
to
focus
on,
and
that
might
help
us
like.
If
we
do
want
to
gear
some
of
the
discussion
toward
hyper
ledger,
maybe
then
it
does
make
sense
to
try
to
pull
in
someone
there
I
mean
I.
Think
I've
already
had
some
discussions
with
Rai
and
another
woman
cilona
who's
working
at
the
LF
I'm
a
hyper
larger
project
and
have
an
update
either
later
in
this
call
or
I
could
just
send
it
by
email.
A
A
F
A
Okay.
Well,
more
than
hyper
layer
meeting,
which
is
part
of
this
I
would
say,
chaos
DNI
meeting,
and
then
it
happens
that
will
be
meeting
with
hyper
layer
and
perhaps
some
other
people,
so
it
would
be
great
to
have
more
people
involved
from
the
from
the
foundation.
Definitely
yes,
okay!
So
in
terms
of
the
open
shortly
do
tell
me,
the
specific
action
is
well.
Firstly,
talk
to
to
Nicole.
A
A
F
A
A
Then
these
layers
they
were
still
in
inclusion
meeting,
is
well
apart
from
the
specific
use
case
that
we
want
to
have
here
for
these
good
as
well,
that
we
all
meet
in
any
case
and
discuss
about
the
objectives
and
key
results,
and
so
on
that
well
and
these
discussions
that
we
should
have
brought
it
with
some
coffee
and
so
on.
So
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
any
comment
about
this
workers
haven't
met,
others
no.
F
A
Yeah
we
disrespect
people
from
uber
will
be
around,
they
are
well,
they
are
customers
fast,
but
I
was
talking
to
them
about
this.
This
working
group,
an
initiative
and
so
on,
I,
would
say
they
are.
They
are
happy
to
to
participate
and
help.
So
I
will
I
will
contact
them
so
in
case
they
can
join
the
meeting.
A
D
How
can
we
help
in
that
regard?
You
know
in
the
production
of
the
reports
kind
of
thing,
so
how
it
it's
it's
as
weird.
You
know
the
chaos
DNI
work
group
is
is
doing
all
this
excellent
work
around
the
articulation
of
the
metrics,
but
the
deployment
of
them
is
kind
of
another
question,
and
so
we
have
the
communities
or
the
projects
that
are
interested
got
the
the
DNA
work
group,
that's
obviously
interested,
but
then
making
that
point
of
connection
is
is
tricky.
D
D
F
A
Yeah
we
have,
we
had
some
some
kind
of
discussion
last
week
about
this
topic
and
I
think
we
had
two
three
approaches.
That
sounds
like
reasonable
to
the
people
in
the
meeting
or
all
of
these
two
three
ideas
that
were
well
in
the
first
place
like
well.
We
we
are
the
ones
doing
this
in
the
diversity
and
inclusion
working
group,
so
we
produce
a
specific,
let's
say
report
for
community
X.
Another
way
would
be
definitely
to
have
people
from
outfit
G
or
google
Summer
of
Code
or
others.
A
It's
not
specifically
code,
but
it's
it's
kind
of
a
rounded
name.
They
may
help
students
interns
grants
for
this.
The
other
is
that
we
are
kind
of
consultants,
external
consultants,
where
we
help
the
people
from
the
communities.
So
we
have,
let's
say
a
supporter
from
this
community
X,
and
then
we
write
them
around
well.
This
is
the
ni.
B
A
Yeah,
so
the
first
one
is
that
we
do
all
the
work
so
in
the
same
way
that,
for
instance,
an
economy
we
produce
the
open
extract
and
the
report
the
third
one
would
be
like.
We
have
supporter
that
say
in
this
case
pry
from
hyper
layer,
then
he
is
the
one
doing
all
of
the
work,
but
he
may
need
some
directions
or
help
at
the
beginning
and
the
outcomes
on
how
to
produce
things.
So
then
we
are
kind
of
we
are
here
to
help.
A
E
A
Of
course,
and
look
looking
looking
for,
we
can
have
a
call
for
sponsors.
So
let's
say
that
we
I
mean
we
are
people
that
we
are
all
paid
to
do
some
job
and
in
some
cases
this
might
be
part
of
our
job
or
even
or
our
free
time.
I
don't
know
so
we
can.
We
can
make
some
calls
for
for
sponsorship
around
this
and
then
that's
another
way,
and
this
might
be
a
for
the
fourth
portable
method,
arrghh.
B
D
F
D
A
B
B
D
B
A
G
Good
so
that
two
Fridays
ago
we
had
I
can
research
your
own
table
around
go
concerns
of
inclusion
about,
like
looking
at,
which
metrics
to
collect
that'll
kind
of
give
us
more
information
about
how
inclusive
and
open
source
community
was,
and
in
the
end,
we
kind
of
did
like
a
voting
thing
where
we
landed
on
like
two
metrics
or
like
two
things
to
look
at
or
to
start
collecting
as
metrics,
and
one
of
those
are
two,
so
they
were.
One
was
looking
at
the
communication
channel
and
was
looking
at
sentiment
in
in
communication
channels.
G
Then
the
other
one
was
looking
at,
like
full
requests
and
code
reviews
on
github,
as
means
of
looking
at
like
inclusivity
and
Indians
community,
and
we
just
wanted
to
come
back
like
these
two
things
that
we're
gonna
start
off
with
and
kind
of
get
the
community's
opinion.
Unlike
are
useful.
You
guys
think
this
would
be
into
looking
into
you
know:
diversity
and
inclusion.
These
communities.
G
G
We
had
other
metrics
that
we
were
thinking
of,
but
I
could
we
know
that
like
because
we're
we're
looking
into
poly
plugging
into
augur-
and
we
know
already
collect
metrics,
so
we're
considering
like
using
the
metrics
that
auger
collects
already
to
try
to
form
some
like
so
like
learn
more
whatever
see
an
inclusion
but
as
well
as
also
include
you
know
this.
These
two
features
and
kind
of
see
if
they
will
also
provide
some
more
information.
E
B
Think
it's
a
good
idea
to
integrate
this
with
harder,
because
I
know
auger
has
does
not
have
any
DNA
metrics.
Yet
the
sentiment
in
communication
channels
is
something
we've
talked
about
a
lot
now.
That's
just
filling
up
what
we
already
have
on
that,
because
I
think
that
would
be
something
good
to
think
through
and
if
I
remember
correctly,
if
you
don't
have
anything
yet
for
sentiment,
and
so
it
would
be
good
as
Greenfield
for
you
to
explore
and
then
work
with
us
to
define
what
this
actually
means,
how
you
want
to
implement
it.
B
G
A
Yeah,
just
perhaps
a
couple
of
comments
from
my
my
point
of
view
is
well
having
how
many
metrics
are
are
good
to
understand
to
be
aware
of
what's
going
on
in
the
community.
So
basically,
let's
say
you
can
measure
things
and
bring
some
numbers
to
discussion.
I'm,
not
sure.
So
this
is
in
terms
of
diversity.
You
have
how
diverse
the
community
is
from
several
perspectives.
The
other
one
is
how,
with
these
metrics,
we
can
say
that
is
how
inclusive
the
community
is.
I,
don't
know.
So
perhaps
this
is
a
good
starting
point
right,
yeah.
G
We're
definitely
like
aren't
gonna
make
these
the
only
to
you
I
guess
like
standards
for
diversity
inclusion,
but
we
thought
all
the
thing
good
starting
off
point
to
figure
out
what
kind
of
metrics
we
think
we
could
collect
around
these
and
then
kind
of
start
building
up,
because
we
have
like
a
like
a
longer
list,
but
those
were
kind
of
two
wishes
to
kind
of
just
get
started
right
away
and
we
weren't
sure
if
those
like
that
information,
we
need
that
would
be
easily
accessible.
So
we
have
to
work
around
that
as
well.
A
A
A
Let's
say
area
focus
areas
that
we
have,
because
perhaps
there
are
communication
channels
for
I
didn't
know
agenda,
preparation
of
certain
events
somewhere,
and
then
this
is
perhaps
more
related
to
event
than
in
some
other
cases,
and
people
feel
that
the
organizers
of
the
assignments
are
not
that
inclusive
as
others,
and
so
perhaps
we
can
have
this
discussion
as
well.
Okay,
this
make
sense
to
you.
A
G
Yes,
because
I'm
we
at
whatever
like
when
every
juror
goes
on
the
call.
It
was
interesting
because
we
were
like
whatever
we
recreated
this
list
before
we
found
that,
like
cows,
is
a
thing
and
then
like
whatever
we
kind
of
checked
the
things
we
had
and
things
you
guys
had.
It
was
very
interesting
to
kind
of
have
kind
of
like
similar,
similar
metrics,
to
look
at
I.
Guess.
Let
me
get
the
link.
A
Yeah
well,
in
the
meantime,
it
comes
to
my
mind
that
the
in
terms
of
grimoire
lab,
so
the
project
doesn't
have
information
about
sentiment.
Analysis
that
it's
already
integrated
with
any
data
source
the
option
to
have
the
gender
of
the
multi
member
of
the
community.
So
that's
something
to
start
with
as
well.
So
we
would
have
information
in
the
communication
channels,
plus
pull
requests
and
reviews,
for
instance,
which
is
awfully
handy.
G
Okay,
oh
and
then
I
just
dropped
a
link
in
the
chat.
If
you
go
to
like
the
second
to
last
slide,
we
like
me
like
a
little
graphic
and
we're
looking
at
like,
and
we
have.
We
had
some
like
I
guess
concepts
on
there
that
we
wouldn't
look
at.
So
we
were
looking
at
things
like
the
community,
the
policy
contribution
leaders
and
then
like
yeah,
and
then
we
were
like
looking
at
so
that
actually
meets
Rebecca
of
like
the
open
source
community,
we're
looking
at
the
size.
How
old
is
this
project
is
in
open
court?
G
Their
corporate
involvement
in
the
project
will
come
online
thing.
Are
they
using
and
then
trying
to
look
at
like
membership
demographics,
but
those
are
kind
of
like
I,
guess,
big
umbrella
things
throughout
every
community
and
then
for
interest,
including
we're
looking
at,
like
the
composition
of
the
community,
looking
at
participation
from
there
and
then
quality
of
the
parts,
inspiration
and
if
it's
sustained
right
so
like
how?
A
A
A
So
so
girl
already
added
into
the
notes
that
we
have,
for
the
meeting
of
today
a
link
to
the
slides
they
want
to
provide
it.
But
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
asked
you
have
that
that
the
specific
link
or
the
prefer
us
to
link
some
PDF
so
because,
if
not,
people
can
access
the
readable
version
of
the
slides,
yeah.
G
So
I
guess
the
next
steps
were
to
kind
of
dive
more
into
the
two
things
that
we've
selected
in
terms
of
like
the
whole
communication
channels
and
the
code
review
process
or
and
all
the
code
reviews
and
the
PRS
kind
of
dive
more
into
like
what
kind
of
metrics
we
could
collect
around.
That
cuz
like
we
do
want
to
have
like
numbers
right
around
these
things,
but
also
one
like
see
if,
like
looking
at
just
like
general
sense,
so
much
information
as
well.
G
So
we
want
to
find
out
what
kind
of
numbers
we
could
collect,
and
so
that's
like
I
guess
a
process.
We're
also
gonna
talk
to
at
all
the
people
at
augur
kind
of
figure
out
what
what
metrics
they
already
have,
that
they're
collecting
and
look
at
how
those
metrics
can
also
be
like
those
photos,
can
be
used
for
open
source
and
open
source
and
inclusion.
Sorry,
iversity
and
inclusion.
B
G
D
I
think
I'll
kind
of
reiterate
on
garrix
point,
so
this
is
something
we
actually
learned
from
Daniel,
which
was
kind
of
these.
His
goal
question
metric
approach.
I
think
this
is
what
you're
talking
about
georg,
so
just
not
a
metric
for
metrics
sake,
but
try
to
identify
what
the
goal
is
that
you're
trying
to
accomplish
your
respective
of
a
metric
to
begin
I,
don't
know
what
you
were
talking
about:
Georg
we're.
D
B
D
E
A
Have
the
ball
just
did.
The
very
very
last
comment
is
this
double
question.
Magic
approach
or
objective
key
result
is
good
for
framing
the
what
you
are
trying
to
follow
with
this
analysis,
so
it
helped
to
have
a
broader
perspective
of
what
to
do
in
the
next
step.
Just
Kerik
mention
in
terms
of
what
what
what
are
the
next
steps
right.
So
it's
around
that
idea.
E
B
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
maybe
we
kind
of
start
from
the
bottom
of
the
d
is
because
I
didn't
do
my
task
and
I'm
really
sorry
about
this.
So
as
Nicole
is
not
here,
we
only
have
care
I'm.
Not
perhaps
you
are
aware
of
some
of
Nicole
axioms,
so
I
don't
know,
but
the
only
one
I
think
we
can
discuss
about
this.
The
preparation
of
a
prayer
description,
but
it's
still
open
so
I
think
we
don't
have
any
advance
right.
D
Now
we
have
that
big
laundry
list,
it's
a
huge
list
of
metrics
right,
and
so
they
had
asked
that
I
start
connecting
if
a
metric
is
listed
in
the
metrics
page
kind
of
connecting
it
back
to
the
work,
that's
being
done
in
the
respective
work
group.
So
if
there's
a
metric
say
on,
you
know
age
of
pull,
request
and
that's
a
metric,
that's
being
addressed
in
the
GMB.
The
growth
maturity
decline
that
I
make
them
reference.
D
So
this
is
the
new
structure.
This
is
a
lot
of.
This
is
the
merge
structure
of
the
chaos
metrics
repository,
and
so,
if
you
scroll
down
you'll
see
that
table,
do
you
see
that
so
you'll
see
where
it
says
like
GMD
there?
If
you
click
on
see
that
first
one
which
is
closed
issues
for
the
GMD,
you
click.
F
D
And
if
it's
not
being
addressed
like
whatever
say
code
commits,
is
not
being
addressed
by
either
workgroup
right
now
it
just
kind
of
stays
local
in
the,
and
so
what
I
need
to
do
is
I
need
to
go
through
this
list
and
whatever
might
be
in
this
list.
That's
currently
being
worked
on
in
the
DNI
group.
I
would
link
over
to
that
work
or,
if
there's
metrics,
that
you
have
in
the
DNI
in
the
workgroup
that
aren't
in
this
list.
I
would
update
this
list.
D
D
Me
let
me
let
me
do
that
in
the
next
round.
I
mean
this
is
not
finished
this
past.
First,
ok,
yeah
I
think
there
was
a
request
on
that
too,
because
it's
quite
possible
that
two
work
groups
could
be
using
the
same
metric,
but
then
we
don't
want
two
different
pieces
of
work
anyway.
Let's
address
that.
Okay,
next.
D
So,
for
example,
the
big
one
that
has
kind
of
kicked
off
the
whole
common
group
is
the
organizational
involvement.
You
know
the
organizational
diversity,
it's
not
really
finding
a
home
in
DNI
right
now,
and
it's
not
really
finding
a
home
in
da
GMD.
It's
probably
a
one
that
a
lot
of
people
care
about
so
then
the
work
would
just
occur
here
inside
of
this
metric
repo.
So
so
yes,
that's
kind
of
my
kind
of
on
my
task
list
is
to
keep
these
things
organized
and
just
observe
the
work
that
you're
doing
linked.
You.
A
B
This
is
a
data
item
from
last
Tuesday.
We
discussed
the
infrastructure
for
releasing
metrics
and
one
of
the
key
takeaways
from
last,
because
that
we
are
looking
at
different
ways
of
doing
it,
not
just
the
way
I
presented
last
week,
and
then
the
governing
board
will
be
asked
to
on
which
way
want
to
go,
because
what
I
presented
last
week
had
some
downsides
with
regards
to
versioning
mm-hmm
that
were
not
supported.
E
A
E
A
B
A
A
So
we
have
the
issues
with
a
link
to
the
Google
Doc,
but
then
probably
the
next
step
would
be
to
have
someone
taking
those
Google,
Docs
reviewing
them
and
say:
oh,
this
is
good
enough
for
a
pull
request,
let's
say-
or
this
still
needs
and
discussion,
probably
so,
okay
I
will
I
will
volunteer
for
this
and
then
I
will
I
will
review
on
Google
Docs,
together
with
my
previous
tasks,
because
I
still
have
to
go
through
the
outsource
of
those
docks
and
then
add
them
last
contributors.
So
I
am
doing.
A
A
B
A
F
Had
one
item
related
to
the
call
four
speakers
is
open
for
two
events
that
are
taking
place
next
October
one
is
Grace,
Hopper
and
I
know
Nicole
said
she's
interested
in
potentially
she
will
be
there
and
she
is
interested
in
potentially
putting
together.
You
know
the
similar
talk
that
we've
been
trying
to
get
out
to
events
about
the
work
we're
doing,
and
then
the
other
is
all
things
open
takes
place,
very
similar
timing
and
then
actually
the
open
source
summit
Europe
none
of
these
overlap,
but
they
are
in
close
sequence.
F
E
F
B
F
Okay,
well,
the
two:
are
you
in
mid-march
open
source
summit
Europe's
a
little
bit
further
out,
so
we
have
some
time
there,
but
I'll.
You
know
start
tracking
against
those
and
see
you
know
who
we
might
end
up
being
able
to
submit
by
next
March-
or
you
know
the
second
week
of
March
and
then
we
can
always
probably
add
people
in
Islam.