►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.June.10.2019
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.June.10.2019
D
E
E
So
what
we
are
now
in
the
different
working
groups
is,
we
are
trying
to
release
certain
number
of
metrics
like
well.
These
are
ready
to
be
consumed,
let's
say,
and
for
this
the
first
link
provided
by
math.
This
is
like
the
list
of
metrics.
We
have
in
each
of
their
seven
focus
areas
that
we
have
in
diversity
and
inclusion,
so
you
see
that
we
have
even
diversity,
contributor,
community
diversity,
communication
link,
receive
it
etc,
and
then
there
are
some
jll
green,
blue
and
red
things.
E
So
this
is
some
say
agreement
between
the
people
that
were
participating
in
this
meeting
like
well.
This
looks
good
to
me.
This
might
be
included
in
the
in
the
release,
so
those
in
green,
the
four
in
green.
So
you
can
see
three
in
event,
diversity
and
another
one
in
leadership.
From
our
point
of
view,
those
are
ready
to
go.
E
E
Those
are,
let's
say
the
four
pull
requests
we
have
for
the
release
of
this
document.
So
if
you
entered
there
you
will,
you
will
see
the
77
78
79
80,
if
you
click
in
any
of
them,
but
you
will
see
basically
a
commit
or
several
commits
where
we
are
having
some
specific
discussion
where
we
are
kind
of
releasing
an
opening
a
discussion
about
well,
this
is
the
metric
as
we
feel
should
be
there.
B
E
The
even
diversity
family
friendliness,
so,
as
you
can
see,
there
are
some
changes
from
the
previous
version
where
we
are
basically
discussing
about
the
question.
So
each
of
the
sections
that
you
can
see
here.
These
are
the
same
across
all
of
the
metrics.
We
have
in
diversity
and
inclusion.
So
we
have
the
question.
The
description,
sample
objectives,
sample
study
is
sample.
Success,
metrics
sound
resources,
so
we
are
trying
to
fill
everything
in
all
of
these
sections
in
all
of
the
metrics.
E
We
have
the
four
that
we
feel
that
are
the
the
in
a
good
shape
we
can
say:
art
is
for
so
for
today.
I
will
I,
guess
that
the
discussion
will
be
to
focus
on
this
for
for
matrix
and
say
well,
these
are
good
for
us.
There
are
not
extra
comments
that
I
show
that
there
are
some
comments
for
an
instant
from
Emma
from
Mozilla,
so
we
have
to
discuss
about
them
and
say
well,
these
are
ready
to
release
and
so
on
for
the
rest
of
the
working
groups.
A
A
Think
you
covered
it
like
well.
The
comments
that
Emma
made
is
on
the
template.
We
have
simple
objective
sample,
success,
metrics
and
so
on
to
remove
sample
just
I
hate.
These
are
the
objectives
that
we
identified
here
and
I
fully
agree
with
them,
so
I
started
removing
sample
from
the
headings
just
now.
E
Yeah
yeah
and
the
second
being
served
by
math.
This
is
where
we
are
having
all
of
their
well
agenda
proposal
and
meeting
notes.
So,
if
you
scroll
down,
you
will
see
all
of
the
discussion
we've
been
going
through
during
the
previous
weeks,
and
this
is,
although,
by
the
way
the
date
for
the
release
was
the
20th
of
June
yeah.
C
20
21st
somewhere
in
that
range
and
then
they'll
be
a
so.
Each
of
the
working
groups
will
have
they'll
put
forward
some
number
of
metrics
for
the
first
release,
and
this
Daniel
pointed
out.
D&Amp;I
has
or
that
look
like
candidates
for
release,
and
so
those
will
be
kind
of
frozen
in
late.
June
and
there'll
be
an
open
comment
period
for
about
a
month
and
then,
following
that
comment
period,
actually
do
the
release.
Where.
C
C
C
E
C
Grimore
lab
is
a
set
of
software
tools
that
help
in
the
deployment
of
those
metrics,
so
the
metrics
by
themselves
are
really
just
kind
of
okay,
they're,
very
well
thought-out
conceptualizations,
but
how
they
actually
occur
in
practice
is
kind
of
another
question,
so
we're
more
lab,
like
I
said,
is
one
set
of
tools
and
they
have
their
own
release
schedule
or
that
tool
augur
is
another
tool.
They
have
their
one
release
schedule:
okay,.
E
C
C
E
E
A
E
E
E
So
if
you
open
this
URL,
which
is
in
the
metric
with
me,
sharing
the
chat
which
is
their
stock
PDF
and
you
go
to
page
page
13,
this
is
analysis
that
we
need
for
outreaching
and
google
Summer
of
Code
part
of
this
matrix
that
we
mentioned
there
are
already
part
of
the
raw.
Oh
yeah,
thank
you,
page
13
everything.
E
E
Never
H
I
mean
maximum
minimum,
like
the
active
developers
etc
and
a
comparison
with
the
rest
of
the
community.
So
this
is
because
we
had
all
of
the
students
involved
in
outreach,
Eve
analyzed,
and
we
can
compare
with
the
rest
of
the
community
and
we
can
track
some
numbers
like
the
ones
you
see,
and
you
can
see
how
to
bring
this
know
the
this
dish.
Another
thing.
So
this
is
the
gender
analysis,
let's
see
so
if
you
go
from
13
to
17.
A
So
my
my
first
thought
is
that
not
would
be
good
to
have
a
template
change.
One
Barbie
includes
sample
implementations
or
no
communications
likely
happen.
The
other
templates-
and
we
can
just
add
it
here-
I-
suggest
to
merge
the
pull
request.
We
have
right
now
and
create
a
new
one
to
add
a
new
section,
probably
between
the
success
metrics
and
before
the
resources
and
then
have
unknown
implementations
with
screenshots,
because.
B
A
E
Yes,
so
the
question
is
so:
we
have
in
diversity
and
inclusion,
one
of
the
focus
areas
and
questions
his
mentorship,
but
mentorship.
If
you
enter
into
the
success
metrics,
there
are
lists
of
them
and
part
of
them
are
based
on
this
analysis.
Part
of
they
are
based
and
other
experiences,
but
it's
like
the
they're
really
low
the
really
really
low-level
metric.
E
It's
not
in
the
metric
template,
because
we
we
are
using
kind
of
a
bunch
of
them,
but
some
of
them
are
already
in
this
and
can
be
in
this
case,
or
these
analyses
worse
than
thanks
to
be
more
lap.
So,
but
it's
not
like
okay,
we
are
looking
for
cool
requests,
so
this
is
the
panel,
but
you
can
run
this
analysis
with
this
tooling,
which
is
kind
of
an
example
of
an
implementation,
but
it's
more,
but
it's
not
like
a
direct
metric.
C
A
Question
as
I
understand
it
right
now
is
how
do
we
include
in
our
metric
page
the
screenshots
or
examples
of
how
we
are
able
to
get
metrics
for
mentorship,
using
the
chaos
tools
that
we
have
and
the
report?
The
open
stack
report
lately
shows
it's
possible.
We
just
need
to
figure
out
how
to
represent
it
in
our
metric
yeah.
C
C
I
mean
what
I
have
no
problem
with
that
I
guess
the.
What
is
is
it
known
implementations?
Is
that
the
phrase
we
use
or
the
other
in.
G
E
E
C
G
E
A
F
You
know
right
now,
I'm
just
kind
of
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
everything.
I
know
that
for
OpenStack,
I
was
really
involved
with
the
mentorship
metrics,
so
I've
been
listening
on.
That
inclusivity
is
definitely
something
I'd,
oh
I.
Really.
How
does
that
differ
from
diversity?
Is
that
we
have
diversity,
and
this
is
how
we
are
including
the
diversity
or.
A
A
So
diversity
is
the
question
of
how
different
are
the
people
that
we
have
so
who
is
in
the
group?
And
then
inclusion
is
how
about
to
be
enabled
these
different
people
to
work
together
and
the
difference
between
diversity
and
inclusion
is
that
there
must
be
diverse
people
in
the
room.
But
if
we
don't
talk
with
them
and
don't
have
collaboration,
then
you're
not
being
inclusive.
Okay,.
F
C
A
F
E
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
C
E
B
E
E
Yeah,
so,
oh
by
the
way,
colonel
I
think
we
are
doing
as
well
as
we
are
following
gold
Christian
metric
approach.
So
this
means
that
we
have
well
goals,
are
in
the
working
group
focus
areas.
So
for
this
we
are
all
defining
the
main
goals
that
we
have
when
doing
this,
and
then
we
have
like
well
even
diversity,
recognition
of
good
board.
Well,
the
seven
focus
areas
that
you
see,
then,
for
each
of
them
we
are
defining
a
set
of
questions
and
metrics,
and
each
of
them
are
the
ones
that
you
can
see
here.
E
F
F
C
F
C
C
C
And
and
all
the
working
groups
kind
of
kind
of
function
the
same,
they
have
some
subtle
differences,
but
you
know
if
over
time
you
wanted
to
take
a
look
at
what
was
going
on
and
say
the
risk
working
group.
It
should
be
fairly
easy
to
transition
over,
so
the
practices
should
look
and
feel
similar
between
the
working
groups.
A
E
So
diversity
are,
let's
say,
and
this
is
again
discussion
we
usually
have
so
I
see
the
diversity
like
the
result,
but
we
have
the
numbers
how
diverse
the
community
is.
While
inclusion
is
like
the
tool
we
can
use
to
improve
that
those
numbers,
so
code
of
conduct
I
see
this
as
a
as
a
tool.
So
this
is
part
of
why
I
see
this
has
only
focused
on
inclusion,
but
of
course
we
can
use
the
enact
should.
C
G
A
A
F
A
E
E
F
So
questions
I'm,
you
know
looking
through
and
everything
I'm
going
back
and
so
the
sentence
you
know
a
code
of
conduct
provides
enforcement
for
to
deal
with
people
who
misbehave,
if
that
breeds
strangely
to
me,
and
that
word
misbehave
just
doesn't
seem
to
fit
with
the
concept
of
all
of
this.
How
would
I
note
that
or
how
would
I
start
that
discussion?
Is
it
just
putting
a
comment
on
the
side
or.