►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.March.11.2020
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.March.11.2020
A
B
B
A
So
that's
me
so,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
community
call
yesterday,
Shaun
Goggins
and
I
got
some
funding
from
Mozilla
around
yep
just
around
open-source
health
kind
of
broadly
you
know
so.
Kind
of
this
is
the
way
for
those
of
you
that
don't
know
as
an
academic.
It's
through
grant
dollars
that
I
typically
support
the
work
that
we
do.
Support.
Students,
support,
travel
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
part
of
the
discussion
with
Mozilla
is
so
as
far
as
part
of
our
budget.
We
had
put
travel
dollars
in
there
and
the
travel
dollars.
A
Are
there
hoping
or
not
just
for
folks,
like
Shaun
and
myself,
to
travel
to
conferences
to
talk
about
chaos
related
things
or
particularly
D&I
related
things,
but
how
we
can
travel
to
conferences
to
support
conference
efforts
around
D&I
and
how
we
can
fund
those
efforts.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
the
thought
here
hold
on
just
a
sec
I'm.
Currently,
my
dogs
need
to
go
outside.
A
A
So
the
hope
would
be
is
that
it's
not
just
obviously
matching
dollars
for
the
group
here
at
the
University,
but
it's
matching
dollars
so
that
people
involved
in
DNI
efforts
would
have
an
opportunity
to
attend
conferences
and
work
with
conference
organizers
to
think
through
the
metrics
that
the
DNI
group
has
been
putting
together.
So
that's
the
goal
there
I'd
really
love
to
to
do
a
one-to-one
matching.
A
So
if
we
were
to
bring
5,000
travel
dollars,
for
example,
forward
that
we
could
find
a
way
to
match
the
dollars
so
that
folks,
that
are
example
on
this
call,
could
attend
conferences
to
talk
about
DNI
efforts,
particularly
the
DNI
efforts
of
Kaos.
So
that's
kind
of
the
goal
we
can
bring
these
dollars
forward
anyway
right,
but
the
hope
is
is
that
we
can
kind
of
match
them
and
increase
the
pool
of
dollars
so
that
other
people
can
do
this
work
as
well
so
opportunity
to
go
to
the
conference's
yeah.
So.
D
D
D
D
Her
on
a
lot
of
the
cube
con,
DNI,
probably
probably
I,
would
talk
to
the
events,
people
because
they'll
know
who
the
new
person
is
because
they're
the
ones
who
often
do
the
different
campaigns,
where
they'll
have
something
where
people
can
submit
a
certain
amount
of
time
in
advance
before
any
of
the
LF
conferences
to
get
help
with
those
troubles.
Okay,
we're.
D
D
B
E
Question
would
be
just
to
go
back,
so
is
there
a
budget?
Is
there
sort
of
a
target
or
a
goal
and
then
like
because
I
sounds
like
we've
got
it
you've
got
some
money.
You've
got
some
money
from
this
mozilla
thing.
There's
the
option,
there's
sort
of
always
the
option
currently
to
apply
for
travel
from
the
LF
for
LF
events,
I
believe
that's
usually
LF
events,
but
then
you're
talking
about
this
sort
of
matching
idea
with
you.
C
E
A
That's
fair
yeah,
so
the
I
can
like
the
conversation
with
Mozilla,
at
least
at
this
point
has
been
if
you're
gonna
engage
in
DNI
efforts.
That's
great
that
you
would
go
to
a
conference
and
talk
about
them.
That's
great,
but
can
you
also
help
conference
organisers
to
try
to
understand
how
these
metrics
could
be
helpful
to
their
own
events?
A
So,
for
example,
in
the
DNI
working
group,
there's
a
focus
area
on
event,
diversity,
and
so
it's
a
series
of
metrics
around,
say:
family
friendliness,
code
of
conduct,
speaker
and
attendee
demographics,
so
actually
working
with
the
organizers
to
try
to
have
these?
Have
these
metrics
be
part
of
their
conferences?
So
it's
not
just
going
to
a
conference
to
talk
about
it
to
talk
about
DNI
efforts,
but
it's
also
a
way
to
engage
people
more
directly.
D
Well,
I
know
on
their
platform,
if
you're
using
their
different
LF
tools,
they
were
having
a
matching
thing
for
a
watt
for
a
while
I,
don't
know
how
long
that's
going
to
continue,
but
they
were
doing
some
matching
thing,
but,
like
I
said
I,
don't
know
the
I
told
logistics
of
it.
Nor
do
I
know
that
they
know
no.
D
Community,
but
so
so,
there's
there's
two
things
going
on
there
right
because
there's
events
and
they
have
a
budget
and
then
there's
the
community
bridge
and
they
have
a
budget
and
there's
different,
as
in
with
all
of
these
kind
of
entities.
There's
so
many
different
groups
all
doing
similar
different
things
and.
A
E
A
E
A
A
E
It's
a
meme
yeah.
It
doesn't
think
it
has
to
be
direct,
but
something
is
he
articulated
I
think
if
you
can
or
we
whatever
you
know,
if
you
sort
of
put
something
together
even
like
a
short
slide
deck
or
whatever
you
know
just
makes
it
easier
right
like
if
I
was
gonna,
go
to
my
company
and
say
hey
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
sport.
I
got
it
they'll,
say
here's
what
it
is
and
here's
why
here's?
E
How
much
and
anybody
else
would
have
this-
you
know
I
mean
that's
like
and
that's
sort
of
standard,
so
I
think
if
you
want
to
do
that,
the
matching
thing
you
know-
maybe
I,
don't
know.
There's
a
caste
website
is
that,
like
a
supporters,
supporters,
people
supporting
this
effort
and
then
you
know
and
then
some
kind
of
its
kind
of
like
sponsorship.
I,
don't
know
I
feel
like
I'm
talking
about
like
Katie's
now,
but
you
know
it's
showing
like
hey.
We
took
this
money
and
here's
what
we're
doing
with
it.
E
A
Fair
I
mean
I,
think
the
what
I
had
my
analogy:
that
I
used
yesterday
was
National
Public
Radio
fundraising.
That
was
honestly
just
what
I
was
thinking.
You
know
for
every
dollar.
That's
contributed
this
this
hour.
We
have
matching
funds
from
whomever
that
was
all
but
I
do
point
well-taken
julene
in
terms
of
articulating
it
succinctly.
E
Positive
thinking,
what
is
a
good
is
a
good
analogy
right
because
when
they
do
those
drives
like
this,
they
do
they're
like
super
repetitive
right,
like
they
tell
you
all
day,
long.
Here's
why
your
money
is
helpful,
like
you
want
to
keep
listening
to
us,
don't
you
know
I
mean
they're
like
really
forcing
that
like
why
you
should
not
like.
B
B
B
A
B
B
G
Well,
someone
prepared
like
there
are
a
lot
of
threads
everywhere,
so
I'll
try
to
pull
it,
some
of
them,
so
yeah
I
pre,
am
by
putting
the
outline
in
the
docs.
If
I
go
off-script
force
beyond
it,
please
that
helps
everyone
so
I
guess
we
open
an
issue
a
while
ago
about
the
bad,
your
thongs
I
think
it's
two
weeks
now,
I'm
gonna
share
my
screen
as
I
run
through
those
links,
and
this
way
the
script
is
right
there,
okay,
so
so,
basically
we
have
an
issue
because
we
basically
like
to
a
lot.
G
G
Okay,
so
yeah,
please
feel
free
to
join
the
discussion
on
this
issue.
It's
it's
already
in
the
notes
where
I
just
lost
it
yeah.
If
you
want
to
join
we're
organizing
this
by
a
shared
calendar
event
and
so
feel
free.
If
you
want
to
join
us
and
we'll
include
your
email
and
this
way
you
know
we
can
kind
of
figure
out
if
there's
going
to
be
a
change
or
we're
gonna
postpone
a
week
which
I
doubt
but
but
keeps
it
organized,
so
we
also
have
the
grant
at
the
badging
org
on
github.
G
Yeah,
so
basically,
we
would
like
to
keep
everything
related
to
badging,
if
possible,
to
track
to
an
issue
that
we
have
on
our
meta
repo
there's
a
lot
of
work
happening
in
in
other
repos,
but
the
meta
one
is
just
about.
You
know
everything
not
related
to
badging
somebody
or
you
know,
trying
out
a
pattern
for
our
repositories
and
how
we're
going
to
keep
the
data.
G
Yeah
I
guess
this,
this
topic
of
so
I
guess
outreach.
Ii
is
already
giving
us
a
cue
I
guess
interested
can
candidates
what
we
did
last
week
was
we
tried
to
come
up
with
a
kind
of
a
little
dry
run.
We
figured
if
every
interested
candidate
can
can
have
basically
a
little
exercise
to
do
and
then
they
would
get
their
feedback.
And
then
you
know,
I
succumb
supposedly
and
today
and
I
should
be
able
to
give
some
feedback,
but
I
guess
other
people
already
did
so
basically
we're
just
trying
to
organize
the
process.
G
A
G
G
G
I
guess
for
now,
like
the
the
key
tasks
that
we
have
to
figure
out
in
our
first
couple
of
weeks
was
how
to
get
the
PR
process
working
I
guess
we
already
showed
that
last
time,
but
you
know,
if
folks
would
want
me
to
get
into
that
a
bit.
We
can
do
that
I
guess
other
than
that.
The
key
thing
that
is,
that
we
couldn't
really
kind
of
like
clothes,
was
branding
and
I
guess.
We
also
touched
upon
that
last
week
when
we
tried
to
do
badging.
G
You
know
application
files
that
they're
used
and
we
would
also
include
an
it
links
to
maybe
figma
documents
or
other
things
and
including
it,
the
you
know,
branding
documents
that
maybe
end
up
as
pages
on
the
website
or
the
source
file
for
the
PDF,
just
a
central
place.
Where
you
know,
chaos
keeps
its
branding
and
we
could
do
the
same
for
badging
and
maybe
have
a
sub-module
in
there
being
the
chaos
slash,
branding
repo.
G
G
A
B
G
Yeah
so
I
guess
it's
you're
talking
sorry
you're
talking
about
this
one
here.
So
let
me
yeah
so
so.
This
is
where
it
will
be
available
on
the
website,
but
to
just
clarify
the
idea
of
having
a
chaos,
slash
branding
repo,
because
that
helps
workflow
wise,
not
just
you
know,
front
end,
not
not
just
for
people
to
consume
it
from
from
the
web,
but
rather
for
us
to
know
within
the
project
and
to
have
traceability.
So
are
you
for
this
idea?
G
B
A
G
A
Soja
leaned,
the
the
idea
here
is
with
any
of
the
metrics
we're
always
trying
to
work
to
bring
them
into
practice,
and
so
a
lot
of
the
DNI
metrics
are
a
little
bit
trickier
because
they
don't
come
from
obviously
trace
data,
say,
for
example,
in
a
github
repository.
They
require
more
observable
effort
done
by
communities
or
events,
and
so
the
badging
process
is
a
way
for
an
event
too
bad
to
themselves
as
being
conformant
with
chaos
metrics.
So
at
the
moment
we
have
five
diversity
and
inclusion
event
metrics.
A
So
the
idea
is
to
produce
a
conformance
program
such
that
an
event
could
apply
for
a
chaos'
badge
indicating
that
their
event
is
is
conformant
with
the
chaos
metrics,
a
project
could
do
the
same
for
the
metrics
that
are
associated
with
the
project
we
are
currently
so.
Gay
org,
ildikó
and
I
are
working
with
Steve
Winslow.
This
is
no
kind
of
for
everybody
at
the
Linux
Foundation
who
has
set
up
these
conformance
programs
before
I
think
he
did
it
for
kubernetes,
so
I
think.
A
Isn't
there
kubernetes
conformance
program,
so
Steve
was
the
one
that
was
part
of
that.
So
he's
helping
us
kind
of
through
the
legalese
which
naturally
I
have
zero
bearing
on
as
to
how
just
kind
of
the
documents
that
would
the
wording.
That
would
be
used
to
apply
for
a
badge
and
then
just
kind
of
a
the
documents
by
which
badges
would
be.
A
Badges
would
be
managed
so
we're
working
with
Steve
on
that,
just
from
a
from
from
a
conformance
perspective,
Sallah
also
the
Linux
Foundation
Steve
is
gonna.
Ask
the
Linux
Foundation
to
take
a
look
at
developing
the
badges
as
well,
so
that
they
are
consistent
with
the
way
that
they've
developed
badges
in
the
past.
A
G
A
G
E
Jane
might
be,
and
I'm
not
involved
in
that
project
really
anymore,
but
they
might
be
an
interesting
parallel
because
it
sort
of
it's
a
you
know,
things
that
are
harder
to
measure,
I
guess
right
like
here
and
so
what
they
did
and
I
I
don't
know
if
this
I
don't
know
if
this
would
be
a
good
way
to
go
about,
but
just
for
comparison,
because
I'm
sure
that
people
may
not
unfamiliar
they
did
like
a
salt
conformance.
So
there's
like
a
so
for
those
people
know
to
open
chain.
E
Is
it's
about
how
you
manage
open
source
and
particularly
like
an
open
source,
license
compliance
program
within
an
organization
generally
usually
a
company,
and
they
have
like
a
questionnaire
that
you
go
through
and
sort
of
it
mirrors
the
specification
about,
and
then
it
goes
sort
of
is
like
yes/no
questions,
they're
going
and
then
you
just
fill
that
out
and
then
you
can
put
it
use
the
special
logo
that
says
I'm
open
chain
conformance.
So
I'm
not
sure
that's
the
best
thing
in
this
case
to
have
people
self
confirm,
yeah.
A
E
I
mean
I,
guess
I
guess.
My
question
is
like
it's,
the
least
when
you
go
that
I
could
kind
of
was
there
for
those
conversations.
It's
like
it's.
The
lightest
touch
kind
of
way
of
doing
that
right.
It's
like
the
least
amount
I
mean
there
was
a
fair
amount
of
work
they
had
to
set
up
that
questionnaire,
but
then
it's
sort
of
a
little
bit
like
self
managed.
If,
if
there's
some
sort
of
checking
to
be
done,
you
know
what
is
the
resource
requirement
for
that
right?
This
is
enough.
A
A
You
could
self-report
that,
but
then
just
checking
to
make
sure
it
does
exist
and
it's
up
on
the
website
might
be
something
that
is
usable.
So
the
approach
that
we've
been
talking
about
is
is
using
github,
so
this
the
application
would
be
very
open
and
transparent.
So
one
of
the
things
we
want
to
do
is
make
the
application
process
for
these
badges
very
open
and
very
transparent
and
the
it's
part
of
that
open
and
transparent
process.
A
There
would
actually
be
a
reviewer
assigned
to
that
request,
but
I
think
to
your
point
is
well
Jelena,
like
resources
are
an
issue
here
right.
So
if
I
mean,
if
you
know
a
million
events
apply
for
a
badge.
Clearly
we
have
a
problem.
So
we've
got
a
one
hundred
percent
correct.
We've
got
to
think
through
kind
of
what
how
we
would
roll
this
out
and
what
that
would
look
like.
But
the
idea
is
to
do
it
in
a
very
open
and
transparent
way.
E
G
Visual
to
how
that
looks
like
so,
there
might
be
a
front
end,
which
is
which
is
at
this
point,
not
not
yet
discussed,
but
if
there's
going
to
be
an
event
basically
the
event,
repo
has
a
readme
that
will
list
every
single
badge
that
you
know.
That
is
basically
you
know
awarded,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
get
a
badge
for
an
event,
you
would
say
apply
for
in
the
bend
badge
and
basically
we'll
say:
okay,
you
know
just
enter
your
event.
G
G
Open
the
PR,
you
know
the
usual
PR,
but
it
has
like
a
form
and
then
you
would
start
filling
out
this
information
once
you're
done,
you
would
create
the
pull
request
and
we're
gonna
have
like
BOTS
Auto
assign
you
know
based
on
some
rules.
Certain
people
to
you
know
review
and
then
that
process
would
allow
people
to
also
come
in
and
comment.
You
know
they
they
might
come
in
and
say.
Well
we
need
more
information
here
or
I.
Do
you
have
any
you
know?
Some
clarification
could
could
be
made
in
the
discussion
before
that?
G
G
I
guess
you
can
get
people
to
say
no
like
this
event.
We
know
is
not
diverse
and
inclusive
it's
in
the
public
domain
and
then
it
becomes.
You
know,
discussion,
yeah,
so
I
guess
you
know.
This
is
just
the
little
part
of
the
process
that
we
organized
so
far,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
questions
you
know
before
and
after
yeah.
B
G
Yes,
we
have
discussed
that
and
I
think
it
could
be
also
a
workflow
like
a
github
workflow,
an
automation
on
the
repo
that,
when
a
PR
with
a
particular
label
is
closed,
then
it
will
take
the
description
of
the
OP,
make
it
as
a
markdown
file
and
put
it
inside
the
repo
as
in
in
the
logs,
and
somehow
it
will
include
even
the
link
to
the
readme.
You
know
see
the
log.
You
know
we
can
talk
about
workflow,
because
everything
is
in
markdown
and
that's
the
beauty
and
everything
is
in
a
repo
and
repost.
G
Today
have
like
superpowers,
you
know
so
so
we
can
have
the
scale
bye-bye
automation
and
all
you
do
is
now.
You
have
a
like
a
template,
repo
for
any
badging
that
you
just
use
to
create
a
different
kind
of
badge
and
you
know
tailor
it
so
that
fits
the
you
know
the
personality
of
that
project
or
that
badging
initiative.
G
Yeah
so
I
mean
we're
thinking,
big
picture
github,
slash,
badging,
you
kind
of
want
to
think
a
little
bit.
Okay,
what
it's
a
different!
A
third
badge
comes
right.
What,
if
it's
not
even
chaos,
but
it's
a
you
know
a
partner
with
chaos,
so
so
yeah.
So
I
guess
a
lot
of
you
know
interesting
things
can
come
in
the
future.
Yeah.
B
G
I
thought
about
thinking
about
it,
but
never
got
to
think
about
it.
So
so
yesterday,
when
you
guys
were
talking,
yes,
it
popped
in
my
mind
and
I
was
like
you
know:
I
wish
I
could
just
go
to
get
lab
right
now
and
block
org
I,
don't
know
what
get
lot
does
the
orga
proach
the
same
way?
I
I
have
a
good
lab
account
and
I,
basically
just
have
a
good
lab
account.
Nothing
more
yeah
like
a
funny
thing
about
you
know.
G
B
G
G
B
Yep
so
then
we
can
move
on
to
our
last
item
on
the
agenda
to
go
over
documentation
accessibility
next
week.
I
would
like
to
do
this
first,
because
we
have
people
who
dropped
off
halfway
through
and
I
would
like
their
input
as
well
and
I,
hopefully
can
clean
up
where
we
left
off,
because
we
just
abruptly
stopped
last
week.
B
E
Guys
for
making
a
mess,
III
think
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
am
served
the
right
process,
so
we've
got
the
word
document
or
the
google
doc,
whatever.
That
has
a
bunch
of
comments
that
I
think
we
can
clear
a
bunch
of
those
out
and
then
Sally
I
know.
You
moved
some
of
those
comments
over
doing
issue
in
github,
but
this
document,
the
document
itself-
is
isn't
in
Vietnam.
Yet
is
that
right.
G
E
G
And
I
mean
yeah
and
I
because
III
after
moving
it
that
it
might
have
not
been
you
know
understood
you
know
it
might
have
sent
the
wrong
message.
I,
don't
know
like
I'm
just
inferring
right
so,
but
it
was
really
meant
just
to
declutter.
So
we
can,
you
know,
come
to
the
conclusion
and
keep
the
noise
down,
because
there's
only
so
much
margin.
C
G
B
G
B
On
the
workflow
and
I
really
appreciate
you
just
going
in
and
making
edits
and
making
comments
and
then
also
resolving
them.
This
is
a
community
process
and
you
have
full
edit
rights
on
the
document
so
that
you
can
go
in
and
if
two
of
you
talk
and
degree
clean
up
the
document
by
removing
the
comments,
that's
the
perfect
approach.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
watching
we're
working
on
it.
E
E
E
Well,
I
I
think
it
looks
good
I
mean
I.
Think
that
question
yeah
I
can
go
back
to
that
issue.
Maybe
we
can
end
up
closing
shortly,
but
the
only
question
that
I
had
Sally
is
you
have
this
language
about
artificial
deaths
on
certain
segments
like
I,
suspect,
I,
know
what
you
mean
by
that?
But
do
you
think
we
should
be
more
specific.
G
G
Because
you
know
I
noticed
that
that,
because
I
got
affected
by
it
at
some
point
in
life,
it
was
always
happening,
but
you
know:
I
have
a
lifelong
number
of
conditions
and
they've
never
changed,
and
yet
you
know
they
were
only
serious
enough
to
be.
You
know
considered
there
all
along
at
34,
and
so
you
know
in
25
and
18
Sophia
anyways.
But
but
the
point
is,
it
is
not
fair
to
try
to
claim
that.
We
know
that
with
a
hundred
percent
accessible
content,
there
is
not
artificial
that
you
know.
G
We
don't
necessarily
go
around
and
say:
okay,
let's
try
our
sites
with
screenreader
and
see
if
we
got
it
right
because
first
of
all
well
well
think
it's
cool
and
will
not
know
what
we're
looking
for.
We
don't
know
how
personally
uses
a
screen.
Reader
becomes
empowered
and
the
way
they
use
it
versus
forints.
This
way,
kind
of
like
no
I,
don't
want
this,
please
you
know,
stop
it
stop
talking
Siri,
you
know.
So
we
you
know
it's
it's.
It's
really
a
first
step
to
say
that
there
are
artificial
debts.
G
We
would
love
to
define
those,
but
we
don't
want
to
dismiss
the
fact
that
it
kind
of
is
a
little
bit
out
of
our
realm
to
do
it
on
behalf
of
those
who
need
a
way
to
find
it
safe
to
say
this
is
artificial
debt.
Please
do
something
about
it.
I
guess
empowering
is
the
point
right
now
because
just
trying
to
say
there's
an
accessibility
problem
me.
G
You
know,
I've
tried
the
you
know
many
many
places
on
github
and
I
found
like
dear
github,
like
a
repo
where
people
are
just
saying
to
get
up
what
they
would
like
to
see.
I
found
people
telling
me
we
shouldn't
do
that.
I'm,
like
you
know,
and
then
their
drinks
on
me.
Oh
you
know
you
should
do
it
this
way.
You
know
you're
just
going
about
it
the
hard
way
I'm
like
let's
we
don't
want
to
fight
like
we're
here.
Making
you
know
in
the
air
issues
helping
github
could
listen.
G
You
know
we're
on
the
same
side.
You
know
like.
Oh,
don't
don't
take
it
out
on
me
and
then
you
know
the
battle
still
continues.
So
it's
it's,
it's,
unfortunately,
just
not
the
lack
of
issues,
but
the
lack
of
ways
for
those
issues
to
become
relevant
and
that's
the
right
word.
Unfortunately,
yeah
I'm.
B
G
So
I
might
not
find
the
right
words
and
let's
accept
you
know,
because
those
words
came
from
a
frame
of
reference
and
they
kind
of
have
like
intertwined
experience
or
emotion
or
whatever.
So
so
they
might
not
resonate
and-
and
the
good
thing
about
collaborating
together
is
maybe
I
can
try
to
share
just
one
example,
and
then
you
know
we
try
to
find
words
that
would
resonate
so
remember.
I
shared
the
frictionless
documentation
link
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
where
I
just
showed
the
one
example
I
found
in
the
wild
was
the
autism
self-advocacy
Network.
G
They
release
their
material,
their
content
in
PDF
form
and
they
always
have
two
flavors
of
the
PDF.
One
is
called
an
easy
read
and
the
other
one
is
called
plain
language
the
to
have
the
equal
content,
but
one
of
them
is
just
a
few
pictures
and
headlines
and
the
other
one
is
a
lot
of
text
with
the
same
headlines.
G
So
an
artificial
debt
would
be
to
say
that,
since
documentation
comes
in
plain
language
and
it
doesn't
have
images,
then
the
other
version
that
it
that
you
know
doesn't
do
well
with
a
lot
of
text
that
now
that's
an
extreme
right.
You
don't
have
to
go
all
the
way
there,
but
you
can't
go
from
documentation
that
is
authored
for
reading
and
skipping
by
seeing
the
document
in
front
of
you
to
one
that
is
screen,
read
sequentially,
you
know
line
by
line,
so
so
the
artificial
debt
of
a
table.
G
That
is
a
thousand
rows
that
basically
has
emojis
and
SVG
images
is
that
the
screen
reader
will
kind
of
read
a
thousand
rows
that
read.
You
know
emoji
SVG
image,
no
alt
description,
and
then
it
keeps
doing
that
through
all
those
lines.
Now,
if
you're,
that
person,
one
person
in
the
project
who
needs
to
read
the
screen
reader
version,
the
artificial
event
here
is
that
you
were
hit
by
a
table
that
looks
really
cool
for
everyone
else
and
makes
it
impossible
for
you
to
get
to
the
next
line
that
that
can
make
sense.
C
G
E
That's
a
great
example,
and,
interestingly,
exactly
why
examples
are
great.
Is
it's
it's
sort
of
slightly
different
than
what
I
was
thinking
that
maybe
you
were
meaning,
but
just
the
same
of
that
example,
when
say
the
goal
with
the
goal:
to
foster
understanding
for
the
widest
audience
of
potential
contributors?
E
Does
that
not
cover
that
example?
Because
to
me,
if
you
say
hey,
our
goal
should
be
understanding
for
the
widest
audience
of
potential
contributors
and
a
potential
contributor.
Is
this
person
that
you're
talking
about
then
the
project
sort
of
failed,
because
that
person
couldn't
understand
that
part
of
the
documentation.
G
Problem
is
that
kind
of
pipes
and
Lee
gets
gets.
You
know
what's
the
right
word,
and
so,
when
you
read
the
statement,
there
is
a
little
bit
approximately
something
else.
You
know
you
kind
of
like
say:
okay,
they
mean
this,
and
that
removes
the
fact
that
no
no
it's
not
about
making
it's
not
about
doing
something
nice.
It's
about,
stop
doing
something
the
opposite.
G
That
is
being
not
called
that
easy,
it's
unfortunate,
but
but
every
project
with
a
lot
of
good
people
and
exceptional
people,
and
some
you
know,
jerks
like
they're,
everywhere,
I'm
one
myself,
they
don't
mean
to
tell
you
that
well
reading
a
readme
is
hard
when
you
tell
them
for
me
reading
a
readme
takes
me
forever.
You
know
how
it's
it's
and
they
say
you
know.
Well,
everybody
has
problems
it's
hard
to
read.
G
Yes,
it
is
as
well,
you
know
so
so,
but
what
you
don't
see
is
that,
while
it
is
written
so
that
you
can
read
it
fast,
the
way
that
it's
read
fast
by
you
is
making
it
impossible
for
me
to
read
it
and
because
it's
creating
all
that
overload
so
that
you
can
do
things
fast
and
you
already
do
things
faster
and
you
know
now.
Basically,
people
feel
that
you're
just
calling
them
out
when
they're,
good
people
and
I
don't
want
people
to
have
to
fight
for
that.
In
every
single
project.