►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.July.15.2020
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.July.15.2020
A
A
If
you
are
an
attendee
I'd,
encourage
also
to
add
yourself
to
the
list
and
talk
about
how
you
doing
or
what's
going
on,
maybe
something
in
your
desk
that
we
don't
see
normally.
So
it
looks
like
the
first
thing
on
the
agenda.
So
far
is
the
badging
application
demo,
which
I
had
talked
to
some
people
about
it's,
because
we
are
doing
our
pilot
testing
for
the
badging
programs
workflow
this
week
and
I
was
thinking
I've
been.
A
Okay
sounds
good,
so
I
have
created
a
github
account
for
this.
This
is
not
my
github
account.
It's
one
that
doesn't
have
permissions
here,
so
I'm
going
it's
going
to
be
within
the
perspective
of
someone
who
will
be
applying
to
a
venture
project
badge
so
I'm
going
to
start
an
event,
diversity
and
inclusion,
and
what
just
our
repo
that
we
use
to
apply
for
event.
Badges
now
right
now
did
I
write.
A
Now
you
have
to
navigate
to
the
readme
of
the
project,
and
this
is
where
we
kind
of
have
our
list
of
badge
events
of
projects
and
you
edit
the
file.
Now
it
recommended
there's
a
lot
of
recommendations
here
on
how
to
add,
separate
the
columns,
put
the
lines
together,
which
is
nice
to
have
for
in
case
anybody
would
like
to
do
that.
For
me,
I
do
control
C
for
copy
and
ctrl
V
for
paste.
That
makes
it
a
lot
easier
to
add
an
event.
A
A
So
then
you
go
to
the
bottom
of
the
page
and
you
can
add
your
own
flavor
to
this
kind
of
thing,
but
really
you
just
have
to
say
I'm
adding
this
event
and
what
the
name
is
you
go
down
to
proposed
changes
and
you
create
a
pull
request
with
this
added
line
item
now.
This
is
the
so
this
is
the
actual
document
for
submission
of
an
event.
This
would
say
what
you,
what
you
are
committing
to
and
how
you
can
provide
links
here.
A
A
B
C
A
B
A
B
A
So
I'm
going
to
log
in
with
my
time,
law,
I'm
already
logged
in
but
I'm
going
to
get
in
with
my
other
account
on
getting
up
real,
quick
and
show
you
what
the
other
side
looks
like
and
how
the
and
and
there's
a
there's
a
pretty
quick
way
to
show
how
the
bots
interact
with
the
pull
requests.
So
that's
one
I
think
clear
up
some
of
the
things
that
you're
confused
about
I
believe.
D
A
E
A
If
I
assign-
let's
say
I,
signed
myself
on
this
one
I'm,
just
as
an
example
and
we
refresh
the
page-
it's
created-
oh
it
takes
a
little
bit
maybe,
but
it
creates
a
checklist
for
me
that
I
can
fill
out
related
to
how
this
project
is
doing
with
their
diversity,
inclusion
or
how
this
event
connects
to
the
diversity
and
inclusion
in
this
space.
So
then
I,
just
it
small,
so
just
checking
off.
Do
they
do
this?
A
Well
err,
not
at
this
point,
but
that's
and
then
it
takes
two
reviewers
to
suggest
badges
and
then
kind
of
deliberate
over
which
babs
they
choose
and
that's
kind
of
the
basic
of
how
the
submission
and
review
process
goes.
I'm,
definitely
open
to
taking
questions.
Cuz
I
wanted
to
keep
it
concise,
so.
B
A
We
have
a
review
testing
gut
and
I'm
pausing.
My
screen
share
for
a
second
for
ducks,
and
then
we
have
a
the
applicant
testing
guide.
So
these
are
okay
kind
of
the
what
we
have
so
far
for
how
to
how
to
review
or
how
to
apply
for
something
and
that
kind
of
just
the
process.
For
that,
and
then
the
review
testing
guide
is
how
to
review
a
project
based
on
that,
and
it's
got
all
the
details,
that
kind
of
said
it
more
mm-hmm
and
we
also
we
have
a
lot
of
documentation.
A
That
Asda
has
thankfully
made
on
the
reviewer
guide
reroll,
which
is
more
like
a
permissions
thing,
and
then
the
submission
guidelines
in
the
event
criteria
document
so
specifically
for
events
we're
going
to
be
measuring
different
metrics
for
different
events
based
on
the
event
itself.
It's
going
to
be
a
little
harder
to
measure
here,
so
it
might
just
be
a
matter
of
assigning
an
arbitrary
size
to
the
event,
but
that's
that's
an
that's
outlined
in
the
event
criteria
and
also
the
documents
that
we
have
put
forth
for
the
reviewers
okay.
So
no
Justin.
F
G
Maybe
it's
I,
don't
know
the
right
way
to
word
it,
but
I
was
just
actually
a
little
curious
of
some
of
these,
like
I've,
actually
really
understood
the
process
really
well,
based
on
the
documentation
that
you
sent
before
their
call.
But
I
was
just
a
little
more
interested
I
guess
in
some
of
the
bigger
picture
stuff
like
what
this
review
process
like
how
the
process
works
and
kind
of
what
what
we're
doing
with
these
events
that
were
were
curating.
That
was
where
a
lot
of
my
questions
were.
G
A
So
I'm
glad
to
provide
that
context,
and
the
big
focus
for
us
right
now,
since
what
since
Austin
and
I
are
working
on,
the
workflow
process
is
to
know
where
the,
where
the
issues
are
in
the
workflow
process
and
where
we
can
help
provide
more
insight
to
people
on
how
to
do
this,
or
maybe
even
adjust
the
workflow
itself,
and
we
will
be
doing
that
too.
To
update
and
make
it
more
human-friendly
at
this
point
is
what
we'll
focus
on.
H
B
B
So
just
developing
the
metrics
is
one
thing,
but
then
having
the
metrics
have
an
impact.
A
positive
impact
in
the
world
is
the
next
thing
or
another
thing,
so
the
the
badging
program
is
a
way
to
have.
The
metrics
that
are
developed
within
the
DNI
working
group
have
an
impact
in
the
world,
so
that's
kind
of
one
part
of
it.
Does
that
help
it
a
little
bit?
I
have
a
second
part
too,
but
yeah.
G
B
So
I
think
that's
great,
so
the
the
idea
of
of
the
process
that
Matt
is
showing
with
respect
to
doing
it
on
github.
The
idea
was
that
if
an
event
is
going
to
request
a
badge,
this
is
signaling
that
they
are
being
attentive
to
these
particular
DNI
metrics,
that
we
want
that
we
wanted
that
review
to
occur
in
the
most
transparent
way
possible
and
in
the
most
constructive
way
possible.
B
So
we
didn't
want
events
to
certify
that
they
are
doing
this,
but
we
wanted
it
to
be
a
reviewed
process
by
which
there's
some
some
some
guarantee
that
what
what
the
event
is
is
doing
is
is
being
done.
So
that's
why
this
is
occurring
in
the
in
the
open.
The
intent
to
of
the
review
is
to
help
events
that
maybe
aren't
able
to
hit
particular
metrics
to
help
them
find
ways
to
do
that.
So
so
the
review
isn't
meant
to
be
like
no
you're,
not
doing
this.
B
B
Step
two
and
then
also
like
what
the
question
about
what
we
do
after
a
badge
is
issued,
say
to
an
event
like
how
we
represent
that
I
think
it's
still
to
be
determined,
I
think
we
still
have
to
work
that
out
a
little
bit.
So
if
Justin,
if
you
apply
as
an
event
and
you
go
through
this
process-
and
you
receive
a
badge
like
how
do
we
ensure
that
that
you
have
the
badge
made
available
to
you
for
your
event?
B
B
B
B
A
H
A
H
H
H
B
A
Makes
sense
and
we
plan
to
have
a
system-
that's
more
automated
in
the
future,
but
this
is
this
is
kind
of
reflective
of
the
overarching
workflow.
Well,
we
have
we
have
to
work
out
some
things
with
like
getting
getting
at
the
automation
to
work
basically
before
we
before
we
have
that
become
part
of
the
work
law.
Okay
and
justin
has
a
question.
Not
maybe
I
missed.
What
are
the
entry
points
on
the
for
an
event
seeking
review
or
a
viewer
who
wants
to
contribute
overview?
I'll
start
with
your
second
question.
A
A
Slack
message,
maybe,
but
the
other
one
is:
what
are
the
entry
points
for
an
invent
seeking
review,
so
we
normally
direct
people
to
the
badging,
the
badging
organization
and
then
the
diversity
and
inclusion
repository,
which
gives
a
lot
more
information
on
like
what
the
badges
mean
problem,
saving
opportunity
go
and
then
applying
for
a
badge,
there's
more
requirements
and
guidelines,
and
things
like
that
in
here.
So
maybe
we
should
move
some
of
this
over
to
the
individual
badging
repositories,
because
this
provides
a
lot
more
information
on
how
to
do
it
and
why
we're
doing
it.
A
And
you
said
documentation:
oh
yes!
Yes,
we
may
need
to
remove
this
one.
Okay,
sorry
about
that
so
diversity
and
inclusion,
since
we
may
eventually
have
more
about
games
than
just
diversity.
Inclusion
badging,
through
the
chaos
project
we
have
just
the
kind
of
a
the
badging,
is
a
central
organization
that
we
host
the
other
badges
on
that.
B
B
You
so
it
sounds
like.
Maybe
could
you
go
back
to
the
main
organization
level?
Okay,
so
right
now
you
have
pin
you
have
meta,
DNI
and
badging
template,
like
maybe
pinned,
should
be
event,
DNI,
project
DNI
and
the
diversity
and
inclusion,
because
that
seems
like
where
you
want
people
to
enter
at
this
point
is.
A
F
B
A
B
A
A
B
A
A
That's
a
good
idea.
Yeah
yeah
I've
been
talking
about
that
a
little
bit.
The
form
is
something
that
we
really
want
to
have,
but
we
haven't
been
focusing
on
it.
While
we've
been
focusing
on
the
workflow,
because
it's
going
to
be
a
little
more
of
an
involved
movement
but
I
believe
that
that's
definitely
the
direction
we're
going.
B
G
E
I
B
B
It
is
I
what
I
was
gonna
say.
Is
we
all
have
the
luxury
we've
been
talking
about
the
DNI
badging
program
for
a
long
time,
and
we
can
see
these
subtle
changes,
but
the
hope
is
is
that
events
who
are
unfamiliar
with
all
of
this
backstory
can
easily
come
to
either
the
Chaos
webpage,
or
this
repository
and
begin
the
process
with
the
lowest
trajectory
that
they
can
enter
very
quickly.
A
G
G
Think
the
chatter
that
came
him
up
from
the
github
issue,
but
that
was
I,
think
the
question
was
maybe
if
this
is
like
something
that
would
be
interesting
like
what
would
be
the
value
in
this
work
and
then
the
proposal
I
put
out
there
was
kind
of
like
that
four
step
process
of.
Maybe
we
could
approach
this
and
then
check
back
again
on
the
feedback
we
collect.
If
that's
useful
but
I,
guess
that's
the
context
of
the
ticket.
B
G
I
think
that's
what
would
be
helpful
to
figure
out
what
specific
parts
of
the
metrics
that
we
like
to
get
feedback
on.
That's
also
something
that
I
had
pain
Darrell
about
this
as
well,
just
because
on
the
design
piece
I'm,
not
as
I'm,
not
a
designer
I'm,
an
engineer.
So
it's
not
something
that
I
am
I.
G
Think
there's
a
lot
of
folks
who'd
be
interested
in
kind
of
helping
us
figure
that
out
in
terms
of
how
to
scope
this
and
how
to
talk
about
these
things
and
how
to
think
about
how
to
collect
feedback,
but
I
I.
It
was
just
an
idea
that
came
to
mine
and
I
I,
just
kind
of
put
it
into
the
github
issue
and
actually
forgot
about
it
until
this
week.
G
D
I
think
is
what
Justin's
point
is,
and
by
getting
more
of
a
diverse
group
of
people
to
kind
of
speak
to
these
issues,
then
we
make
sure
that
you
know
we're
catching
everything
and
that
it's
not
just
like
based
on
are
fully
abled.
You
know
like
well
in
my
instance,
white
woman
lens,
you
know,
so
we
want
to
just
kind
of
make
sure
that
we
have
a
group.
That's
all
feeding
into
this,
so
we
don't
miss
stuff.
I
think
was
what
Justin
was
trying
to
say.
I
G
H
G
Maybe
maybe
it
would
be
helpful,
like
the
thing
that
I
just
from
some
of
the
work
that
I've
done
in
the
Fedora
community
with
this
similar
kind
of
approach?
Maybe,
but
if
we
want
to
do
like
a
process
and
start
thinking
about
ways
to
do
it,
we
could
start
with
maybe
doing
some
async
work
or
discussion
now
too,
but
just
figure
out
what
the
messaging
we
want
to
really
focus
in
on.
G
So
maybe
not
trying
to
do
all
the
D&I
metrics,
but
really
focusing
on
like
here's,
two
that
are
focused
on
like
disabilities,
and
we
want
to
really
focus
on
having
conversations
about
disabilities.
So
that's
the
kind
of
feedback
we
solicit
and
so
then
that'd
be
like
the
step.
Two
would
be
trying
to
figure
out
what
questions
do
we
want
to
like?
How
do
we
want
to
build
these
interviews?
How
do
we
want
to
approach
them?
Third
part
would
be
to
actually
start
doing
some
of
that
outreach
and
inviting
people.
G
This
would
be
I
think
an
interesting
point
to
maybe
do
some
of
outreach
to
open
source
design,
folks
who
are
looking
for
design
contributions
and
then
I
think
that
might
be
once
we
have
done.
If
we
can
do
all
those
things,
I
think,
then
we
could
take
a
moment
to
pause
and
then
take
the
feedback
and
figure
out.
What's
the
next
important
thing
or
what
how
to
prioritize
from
there.
B
G
D
B
Was
just
trying
to
I
was
thinking
about
how
this
could
possibly
fit
into
the
workflow
of
how
metrics
are
released
from
from
DNI
such
that,
maybe
as
part
of
the
review
period.
We.
This
is
when
we
start,
including
something
along
the
lines
of
the
interviews,
were,
were
as
a
working
group
a
little
bit
more
proactive
in
terms
of
soliciting
that
feedback
it's
a
little
late
in
the
chain,
because
that's
the
review
period,
but
maybe
somewhere
along
the
the
design
and
the
development
of
the
metrics.
D
Kind
of
on
a
little
tangent,
I
think
to
your
point,
Matt
about
offering
advice
as
well
to
events
or
projects
on
how
they
can
increase
their
if
they're
trying
to
get
a
badge
I
mean
if
they're
trying
to
you
know
improve
so
that
they
can
raise
the
level
I
think
having
a
group
that
we
could
tap
into
I.
Think
Arielle
just
mentioned
my
group
of
UX
designers.
So
if,
like
accessibility
website,
accessibility
is
one
of
the
the
criteria,
for
instance,
and
they're
not
there.
Well,
that
would
be
maybe
a
great
group
to
that.
D
Could
like
write
some
guides
or
something
like
that,
that
we
could
point
people
to
to
say
hey
here:
here's
how
you
can
make
your
website
more
accessible
for
your
event
and
get
that
badge
kind
of
a
thing.
So
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
helpful.
Just
you
know,
group
of
people
in
general,
just
that's
just
one
little
tiny
example,
but
that
you
know
just
having
those
those
experts
and
those
other
people
around
to
kind
of
tap
into
their
knowledge.
That
will
help
our
people,
who
are
trying
to
be
better
like
we
can
facilitate.
B
B
C
C
C
C
So
you
don't
really
need
to
think
about
I
mean
you
can
think
about
what
you
want
to
get
from
these
interviews,
but
kind
of
you
can
go
in
very
early
to
that
stage,
and
sometimes
I
would
argue
that
it's
really
beneficial
to
go
in
early
and
kind
of
really
kind
of
collaboratively
define
what
you
want
to
explore
and
then,
hopefully,
what
I
see
designers
bringing
into
this
issue
particularly,
is
are
like
well.
If
you
want
to
learn
about
X
from
X
people,
then
here's
a
methodology
that
I've
used
in
my
design
life.
B
C
C
B
B
Any
sense
but
like
if
we're,
if
we're
thinking
if
we're
gonna,
engage
with
designers,
which
I
think
is
a
super
great
group
of
people
like
what
in
what's
the
what's
the
what's
that
point
of
connection,
is
it
help
us
understand
the
metrics
that
we
should
be
looking
at
when
we're
thinking
about
design,
or
is
it?
How
do
we
design
our
communities
to
effectively
consider
these
metrics?
That.
I
I
D
That's
what
I
was
I
was
gonna,
just
basically
say
what
Ariel
said
just
now.
The
people
that
we're
maybe
wanting
to
reach
out
to
are
likely
not
on
our
mailing
list,
because
we're
trying
to
reach
people
that
we
haven't
in
the
past,
or
you
know
that
we
want
to
make
specific
effort
to
reach
out
to
now.
So
that
would
be
the
the
benefit.
I
think
yeah.
I
So
it's
not
like
social
media
is
about
like
who's
loudest.
This
is
really
that
you
can
direct
your
questions
to
people
who
are
on
paying
of
the
related
topics,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
people
there.
They're
just
signed
up
because
it
was
like.
Oh
it's,
a
social
media
thing
and
then
no,
no,
no
like
they
found
a
lot
of
good
structured
debate.
There.
A
I
A
I
G
The
best
way
we
could
start
on
this
would
be
to
frame
what
exactly
we
want
to
talk
about
on
this
for
the
next
meeting.
So
if
we
wanted
to
like
I,
don't
know,
maybe
maybe
we
can
identify
like
right
now,
like
a
part
of
our
metrics.
That
would
be
a
good
candidate
to
start
with
and
and
go
with
that
and
then
try
this
out
instead
of
trying
to
try
to
jump
on
this
right
away.
G
B
Does
yeah
I
really
like
this,
because
it
again
I
think
pushes
the
development
of
the
DNI
metrics,
which
are
super
old,
super
thoughtful
ways
to
think
about
DNI
in
your
projects.
It
moves
them
into
more
applicable
or
applied
spaces,
so
they
don't
just
sit
as
metrics,
but
they
really
start
having
an
impact
in
the
world
which
I
think
the
goal
of
a
lot
of
these
metrics
right.
Let's.
H
H
It's
about
just
putting
in
a
small
fraction
of
your
readme
all
contributing
files
and
making
it
about
including
designers,
so
it
could
be
like
okay.
If
you
think
that
this
project
can
use
a
bettered
like
better
insight
from
a
designer
or
if
there's
any
way,
you
think
you
can
contribute.
So
you
can
reach
out
to
he
made
a
mess
or
open
an
issue
which
could
be
labeled
as
design.
So
just
I
think
I
see
it
as
a
starting
point
for
including
my
design,
I.
B
A
Just
wanted
to
say
pretty
videos
any
extra
questions
about
badging.
We
have
a
meeting
after
this,
just
like
I'll,
actually
just
include
the
Google
meet
link
because
we're
doing
it
on
meet,
but
if
you
want
to,
if
you
have
any
extra
questions
or
discussions
about
badging,
come
to
this
link
and
we'll
have
a
good
time
and
other
than
that,
nobody
has
anything
else.
Last-Minute
questions
burning
desires.
Anything
like
that
I.
D
E
Hello
so
I
wanted
to
you
know
the
I'm
new
to
the
group
so
I
joined
on
the
the
last
meeting.
You
know
I'm
right
so
I
wanted
to
ask
questions
regarding
design
because
I
know,
particularly
the
dopers
Design
Group
open
source
design.
Dotnet
group
has
been
looking
for
ways
to
should
I
say
which
other
projects
or
projects
I've
been
able
to
reach
out
to
the
open
source
design
group
in
a
way
that
they,
you
know,
start
as
like
opposites.
E
What's
the
word,
a
great
guy
that
could
onboard
designers
the
way
are,
you
know
there
are
engineers
care
about
setting
up
annoying
development
environments
at
all,
so
I
feel
like
on
the
maybe
I
might
admit
this
conversation,
but
I
feel
like
on
the
on
the
project
side
of
it.
It
should
make
more
sense
to
work
more
with
the
open
source
design
group
in
a
way
that
projects
that
want
some
kind
of
you
know.
E
Like
I'm
kind
of
the
looking
on
onboarding
process
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
but
I'm
pushing
for
including
a
project
sugar
lab
that
I
also
maintain
is
the
fact
that
there
should
be
also
a
great
opportunity
for
open
source
maintenance
to
give
in
ways
that
designers
can
cut
you
good,
so
I
feel
like
this
could
be
something
that
could
be
added
to
the
project
category
in
terms
of
having
a
badge
in
a
way
you
know
working
the
officers,
design
team
to
say,
okay.
So
what
do
we
care
about?
E
Like
example,
like
the
maintenance
have
almost
no
clear
on
on
tools
like
you
know,
figma
or
platforms,
you
know
and
say:
okay,
you
could
work
on
this
and
they
maybe
could
expose
on
SVG,
since
SVG
is
more
should
I
say,
more
welcome
in
open
space,
so
I
feel
like
this
is
something
that
could
be
added
or
maybe
already
has
been
processed.
But
this
is
something
that
could
be
added
into
the
projects:
category
I'm
having
a
bad
I,
don't
know,
if
that's
you
know,
make
sense.
A
Think
we've
had
a.
We
had
a
not
a
lot
of
items
in
the
meeting
today,
but
we've
had
a
long
meeting
for
that
amount
of
items
well
over
at
the
fastest
50
minute
mark,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
close
at
the
meeting.
But
thank
you
all
for
being
here
and
I
might
see.
Some
of
you
in
the
next
meeting
see
ya
thanks.