►
From YouTube: CHAOSS DEI Working Group 11-3-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hi,
everyone
welcome
to
november
3rd
edition
of
the
dei
working
group
for
chaos.
I
am
elizabeth,
the
community
manager
here
and
we
have
a
very
late
group
because
people
are
traveling
this
week
and
conferences
and
whatnot
so
yeah.
We
do
have
a
couple
of
things
to
talk
about.
If
we
want,
if
that's,
okay
with
you
all
it's
a
week,
it's
probably
gonna
be
a
really
short
meeting,
but
I
can
share
my
screens.
We
can
just
go
over
the
stuff.
A
C
A
So
we
did
number
one
yay
all
right
number
two
is
we
have
this
onboarding
form
which
matt
has
seen?
I
don't
remember
if
you
were
in
the
meeting
when
we
showed
it
the
last
time
or
not.
Yes,
I
was,
but
I
don't
know
if
there
has
been
any
changes
made
after
we
gave
our
comments.
There
has
I
showed
it
to
at
the
community
meeting
yesterday
and
there
was
some
additional
feedback.
A
So
here's
what
the
final
form
of
the
final
form
looks
like
we
added
the
github
username
her
maxc
suggestion
and
we
added
some
links
to
what
things
are
for
a
suggestion
from
ray
in
the
community
meeting.
We
also
added
some
examples
of
like
what
things
could
be
and
we
added
some
translation.
C
I've
got
just
a
small
bit
of
feedback
on
the
feedback
feedback.
We
are
going
to
be
getting
rid
of
that
repository
for
the
dei
magic.
We're
just
gonna
have
the
event.
Diversity.
Inclusion
be
the
main
point
of
contact.
So
it's
also
what's
the
link
in
here
if
you
could
possibly
switch
that
over
and
whenever
you
get
a
chance.
C
So
it
says
being
a
reviewer
for
the
badging
initiative
and
then
that
link
is
actually
going
to
be
a
a
dead
repository
coming
up
here
soon,
because
we
folded
it
into
the
event
diversity
conclusion
one
because
it
looks
like
we're
going
to
be
focusing
only
on
events
and
all
and
we'll
be
doing
the
project
stuff.
Okay,
so
we'll
be.
F
Okay,
so
this
link
here
is
going
away.
Oh
I'm!
So
sorry
I
was
reading
it
as
as
the
old
repository.
Oh.
A
A
So
you're
talking
about
like
the
github
badge
github
slash
badging,
is
going
away.
C
Github,
slash
badging,
slash
diversity
and
inclusion.
We
had
an
extra
repo
that
I
thought
that
you
were
pointing
too
sorry
about
that.
Oh.
A
E
A
Perfect
oops,
okay,
so
if
this
is
cool
then
I
will.
I
will
go
ahead
and
send
this
out
via
twitter.
A
And
and
then
eventually
we'll
get
it
on
the
website,
but
no
big,
all
right.
We
have
some
old
metrics.
So
last
time
we
were
looking
at
the.
A
A
Yeah
I
I
definitely
can
see
that
as
well.
A
And
then
this
sponsorship,
if
we
have
time
next
time,
we
can
look
at
that
as
well.
This
is
an
older
one
as
well.
It
was,
I
think,
the
last
last
commit
was
january
21st
and
it
was
just
adding
symbols,
so
this
is
like
a
two-year-old
metric.
One
of
the
original
early
ones
so
probably
can
use
a
little
refresh
on
that
one
as
well
and
then
so.
Moving
on
to
last
week,
we
had
also
talked
about
cleaning
up
our
technical
debt
with
regard
to
like
archiving
some
things.
A
One
of
the
action
items
we
had
was
to
make
a
new
branch
with
the
name
archive.
Just
so
we're
not
like
deleting
anything,
but
I
don't
know
if
someone
did
that
yeah.
C
A
C
Yeah,
I'm
sure
someone
like
gary
who's
really
going
to
get
might
be
able
to
help
with
that.
A
Yeah
I
just
I
don't
want
to
break
anything,
but
I
totally
understand
you
know
why
we
would
want
to
kind
of
clean
that
out
and
leave
the
focus
on.
What's
what's
active,
hi
justin
good
to
see
you
sorry.
A
Actually
we're
now
on
number
five,
because
I
think
this
cleanup
of
technical
debt,
we
are
going
to
wait
till
well.
We
made
the
first
step,
and
now
we're
gonna
talk
about
it
next
time
when
we
have
a
little
bit
bigger
group
as
to
what
we're
what
we
need
to
do
with
these
things,.
C
C
B
I
was
doing
some
cleanup
and
I
was
going
to
move
those
minutes
because
there
was
a
lot
of
the
meeting
minutes
that
we
had
even
before
that
dock.
So
I
was
going
to
try
to
clean
that
up
along
with
that,
the
link
in
google
drive
because
it
doesn't
render
right
and
put
that
into
our
repo,
but
I
just
didn't
circle.
I
was
gonna
wait
until
this
pull
request
got
merged
first,
before
I
I
followed
up.
Is
this
the
one.
A
B
No,
this
one
was
really
just
moving
some
things
around
and
following
some
of
the
like,
putting
like
the
github
documents,
all
together
for
the
documentation
and
just
trying
to
get
things
in
place
before
I
make
another
pull
request,
with
moving
all
the
minutes
and
meetings
and
stuff
around
so
that
gets
merged.
I
can
add
that
to
my
list
for
this
week,.
C
A
A
B
A
A
D
D
A
This
out,
okay,
perfect
anything
else
with
this.
A
All
right
next,
one
on
the
list
says
badging
outreach
request
and
I
believe,
that's
coming
from
matt
c.
C
Why
did
you
say
that?
Oh
I
got
to
fix
my
name,
I
always
forget
to
fix
my
name,
so
I'm
I'm
going
by
the
matte
canties
now,
just
so
it's
less
ambiguous
right
now.
My
name
is
fully
changed
but
yeah.
So
so,
as
far
as
the
outreach
request
goes,
we
were
talking
in
the
last
outreach
meeting
yesterday,
actually
about
putting
putting
together
something
some
kind
of
shout
out
for
viewers
or
some
kind
of
some
kind
of
way
to
thank
them.
C
We
were
thinking.
The
event
would
be
something
like
kind
of
like
the
vagina
hackathons,
but
less
about
getting
something
done
and
more
about
being
thankful,
and
I
don't
know
that's
that's
just
I
was
going
to
bring
it
to
the
group-
might
be
a
good
thing
to
bring
up
next
week,
just
because
we
have
we'll
have
a
bigger
sample
size
there.
But
if
you
have
any
thoughts,
please
share
them
here.
A
So
if,
if
you
do
want
to
send
something,
I
do
have
an
email
that
I
use
for
chaos
cast
guests.
A
It
basically
just
says
hey
we
want
to
thank
you
well,
thank
you,
but
also
we
want
to
thank
you
more
by
sending
you
a
little
note
and
then
it
says
has
a
statement
about
you
know,
keeping
their
personal
private
information
secure
and
you
know
whatever,
and
if
not,
that's
totally
fine,
but
if
you
would
like
to
make
that
effort
to
do
that
it
it
can
be
a
lot
of
work,
but
I
can
share
that
email
with
you.
If
you
would
like.
C
Yeah,
we
already
did
a
kind
of
a
pilot
of
this
with
badging
stickers.
We
sent
out
everybody
a
sticker
and
put
them
a
handwritten
note
and
that
seemed
to
go
over
well.
So
if
you,
if
you'd
like
to
share
that
email
I'll
go
I'll,
take
an
action
item
to
just
like
get
everybody's
email.
Personally,
that's
a
reviewer!
I
probably
need
to
do
it
as
an
action
myself
and
I'll
get
the
I'll
get
the
emails
together.
I'll
send
them
to
you
or
you
can
send
me
the
email,
whatever
works.
A
And
then,
as
far
as
the
tweets
go,
that
is
super.
We
can
absolutely
do
that.
I
think
that's
really
nice
to
do
if
they're,
a
twitter
user
do
we
have
a
way
of
having
their
twitter
handles
because
I'd
like
to
mention
them
if
possible.
Well,.
C
Ideally,
I'd
like
to
get
consent
before
we
send
out
a
blast
of
someone's
handle
so,
like,
I
think,
yeah
of
course,
I'll
probably
just
start
asking
around
and
see
if
anybody
would
would
be
okay
with
that
and
and
if
so
can
I
get
your
handle
because
I
know
we
list
their
names
on
the
website.
A
C
I'll
have
to
put
my
brain
together
back
together,
first
and
then
and
I'll
I'll
get
I'll
connect
with
you
on
that.
E
C
Release
is
is
monday
and
we
are
so
we're
just
so
grateful
for
everybody.
Who's
contributed
to
that
and
been
a
review
for
that,
and
everybody
who's
been
involved.
We're
looking
at
applying
to
talk
at
frostback
stage,
two
in
in
march,
so
hopefully
we'll
be
applying
to
a
few
different
places,
but
that's
gonna,
be,
I
think,
the
big
one
that
we
apply
to
for
events,
so
just
keep
an
eye
out
for
more
talks
on
badges
in
the
future.
A
I'd
like
to
tweet
about
that,
and
also
put
it
in
the
newsletter,
is
there
like
a
doc
that
kind
of
sums
up
what
was
changed.
C
So
I'm
putting
that
together
for
anita
actually,
as
for
the
last
meeting,
but
I
do
if
you
look
at
the
the
badging
weekly
one
moment
here,
I'm
on
the
wrong
account.
If
you,
if
you
look
at
the
badging
weekly,
we
do
have
in
that
list
of
pull
requests
that
were
accepted
and
it
it
and
all
the
all
the
things
that
we
were
aiming
to
do.
It
has
our
goals
that
we
accomplished
and
also
has
a
summary,
a
summarization
of
each
pull
request
that
was
used.
C
There's
a
link
and
that
that
the
second
of
the
second
meeting
in
the
list
should
have
a
lot
more
so
it'd
be
october.
27Th
should
have
all
the
merchant
requests
and
the
goals
that
we
accomplish.
E
I
will
reference
that
then:
okay,
awesome.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
little
bit
of
time
so,
instead
of
working
on
this
reviewing
these
old
metrics
since
we
have
a
smaller
group,
I
think
we
can
probably
still
look
at
some
of
the
open,
pr's
and
issues
if
that's
cool
with
everybody,
just
because
it's
getting
a
long
list,
and
some
of
these
are
old,
because
they're
kind
of
not
easy
to
deal
with,
so
they
just
sit
there,
which
is
what
happens
a
lot
of
times
with
things
when
they're
not
hard
or
when
they're
not
easy
to
solve.
So,
let's
go
down
here.
A
It
looks
like
we
have
some
some
metric
ideas.
So
at
some
point,
if
anybody
wants
to
pull
any
of
these
out
these
metric
ideas
and
start
writing
them
totally
fine.
A
But
let's
look
at
this.
One
here
consider
inclusivity
and
accessibility,
section
508.
C
If
you
look
at
the
bottom
of
the
bottom
comment
here,
I
saw,
I
think
this
I
think
that
means
I
think
this
can
be
closed.
I'm
not
sure.
A
C
It
looks
like
a
legal
aspect
that
we
would,
if
we
want
to
handle
this
we'd,
have
to
open
another
issue
and
then
follow
up
with
the
lf
team,
because
we
have
we
do
a
lot
of
illegals
to
them.
Of
course,
yeah.
A
B
B
I
was
worried,
I
was
looking
at
some
of
the
other
pull
requests.
Sorry,
I
immersed.
B
A
A
Deal
we're
yeah,
we
just
closed
it.
That's
all.
It's
all
good
agree
in
a
format
for
a
metrics
toolkit
that
makes
application
metrics
easier
for
people
in
projects
yeah.
So
I
think
this
is
actually
what
our
metrics
models
are
meant
to
do
where
you
know
they're,
looking
at
how
to
put
things
together
to
give
people
a
place
to
start.
A
This
is
actually
maybe
more
activities
but
publish
a
series
of
activities
based
on
metrics
like
a
first
aid.
Okay,.
C
A
I'm
always
kind
of
hesitant
to
close
things
just
because
I
don't
yeah,
I
don't
know
interview
campaign
with
unrepresented
groups
and
open
source.
B
But
maybe
there
are
more
opportunities
for
us
to
do
some
explicit
outreach
to
some
folks
to
get
feedback
on
these
metrics
either,
maybe,
as
it
kind
of
fits
into
that
metrics
review
that
we've
been
doing
the
last.
I
missed
the
last
couple
meetings,
but
I
know
we've
kind
of
been
trying
to
go
through
the
older
metrics
and
touch
up
on
those.
Maybe
this
could
be
complementary
to
that
in
terms
of
trying
to
think
about.
B
A
Can
I
say
revisit
this,
maybe
like
after
the
first
of
the
year,
because
at
some
point
before
the
next
metrics
release,
which
is
april,
maybe
that
would
be
a
good
thing
to
do
like
what
do
you
think.
A
A
Metric
ideometric
ideometric
idea
release
notes.
I
think
we
close
these
right.
A
And
then
do
we
need
oops?
Do
we
need
a
speaking
of
that
issue?
Do
we
need
an
issue
for
the
next
release
right?
I
would
assume,
I
think,
that's
what
kevin
does.
E
A
I
don't
know
what
else
he
puts
in
here,
so
I
think
it's
just
like
a
placeholder.
Let's
see,
if
there's
a
label
to
use.
C
Oh,
I
think
you
see
she's
the
wrong
person
he's
clum.
This
one
is
this
one
says
biostatistics
in
michigan:
oh.
A
I
did
that
once
with
matt
g
and
cc'd,
someone
else
in
a
different
thing,
but
they
were
really
interested
in
chaos.
So
there
you
go.
It
was
the
seriousness,
interaction.
B
A
Yeah!
I
get
notified
sometimes
on
stuff.
That's
not
mine,
because
I'm
just
a
lizard
then
so,
but
yeah
most
of
the
time
I
just
ignore.
Unless
it
looks
like
the
other
person
is
never
gonna
come
see
it.
So
I'm
like
yeah,
you
might
wanna
get
the
right
person.
Okay,
cool!
Oh,
I
was
gonna,
add
a
label.
I
think
he
does
add
a
label
to
this,
but
I
don't
remember
now
what
label
it
is.
A
All
right
we're
coming
from
the
bottom
up,
so
standard
structure
readme,
I
feel
like
that,
has
been
taken
care
of
right.
E
E
We
we
did
that.
C
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
josh
will
yell
at
us
or
he'll
holler
at
us.
If
we
didn't
do
that
right
or
there's
something
else,
that's
still
hanging
out
there.
So
it's
all
good.
E
A
A
C
A
E
B
C
C
B
I
think
kevin's
comment
is
probably
about
some
of
those
event
inclusivity
metrics,
that
we
were
working
on
well,
that
he
was
working
on
and
I
was
going
to
work
on
one
after
him.
B
Probably,
making
a
road
map
for
how
we
carry
this
one
out
would
be
helpful.
I
don't
know
if
this
would
be
help
good
to
kick
kick
the
bucket
for
another
meeting
or
I
might
flag
it
for
next
week's
agenda,
but
I
think
a
little
more
wider
input
would
be
helpful
because
it
definitely
will
take
some
coordinated
work
to
get
that
done.
A
Yeah
and
to
kevin's
question
we
do
have
one
which
is
the:
where
did
it
go,
which
was
this
time?
Inclusion
for
virtual
events?
So
that's
specific
to
virtual,
and
maybe
there
are
others
but
yeah,
okay,
cool.
E
C
A
bunch
of
merged
pr's,
basically,
we
were
trying
to
make
changes
to
the
inclusive
leadership
just
right
before
release.
I
think
that
is
all
done.
A
C
E
A
And
then
metric
metric
metric
ideas,
okay,
cool
well,
that
seems
to
be
all
of
the
open
issues
that
we
can
do
stuck
with.
I
don't
know
what
to
do
about
these
two
so
like
lawrence
had
gone
through
and
added
some
changes
to
our
project
burnout
metric,
but
they
were
kind
of
extensive
and
now
it's
kind
of
really
out
of
sync-
and
I
noticed
that
you
also
had
mentioned
this
when
we
were
talking
about
the
dco
stuff
matt,
which
I
appreciate
you
doing-
that
very
much,
because
that
was
really.
A
The
whole
issue
was
that
there
was
the
dco
wasn't
working
and
then
oh
actually,
if
we
get
past
this
dco.
C
It's
been
in
limbo
for
long
enough
that
we
probably
need
to
do
something
with
it,
instead
of
just.
B
C
C
A
Yeah,
I
guess.
A
B
A
I
yeah
and
I
kind
of
I'm
thinking
like
I
I
remember
this
now
and
I
think
it
was
like
we
had
tagged
ruth
and
then
she
was
not
around
for
a
little
bit
or
something
was
going
on
and
then
it
was
just
a
lot
to
look
through,
and
so
I
think
it
was
a
little
bit
overwhelming.
A
So
I
I
wonder
if
we
should,
I
wonder,
is
project
we're
not
going
to
be
one
of
the
metrics
that
we
re-review
for
the
next
release.
It's
not
super
super
old,
so
I
don't
know,
but.
E
What
do
we
want?
Some
kind
of
criteria
for
what
metrics
are
getting.
D
E
A
A
B
Yeah,
some
of
those
more
recent
ones
I
was
I
was
trying
to
get
through
and
there
were
some
merge
conflicts.
I
think
both
of
them
are
are
fine
to
merge
once
the
conflicts
are
fixed.
A
Okay
and
I
think
matt
this
one
was
your
your
conflict
also.
So
if
you
aren't
able
to
resolve
any
of
these,
this,
let
us
know-
and
we
can
just
redo
a
pr
based
on
like
the
more
updated
one
or.
C
Two
yeah
that
was
kind
of
silly,
because
I
changed
my
github
name
to
matt
canty
snell
and
it
was
I
put
in
matt
smell
and
it
said
no,
that's
not
right.
So
I
I
will
just
resubmit
the
pr
with
the
fixes.
It's
it's
basically
a
metric
change,
but
we
already
already
agreed
under
the
meeting.
A
Okay,
perfect
awesome,
awesome,
awesome.
Well,
we
are
about
out
of
time.
This
was
so
productive.
I
love
you
all
so
much.
Oh
my
gosh
we're
on
fire
today
and
yeah.
Now
you
all
can
just
take
the
rest
of
the
day
off,
because
we've
done
our
our
fill,
so
everybody
can
just
yeah
have
the
rest
your
day
we
have
a
thing
for
next
week:
yeah
messy,
okay,
perfect
anything
else
before
we
shut
the
meeting
off.