►
From YouTube: CHAOSS D&I Working Group Call 2-17-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
And
then
we
could
also
ask
at
the
end,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
people
kind
of
joined
throughout.
So
is
there
anybody
who
would
like
to
facilitate
next
week's
meeting.
A
A
A
A
So
I
know
we
talk
about
this
a
lot,
but
I
think
we
have
to
get
kind
of
serious
about
reviewers,
so
we're
starting
to
get
so
for
for
those
on
the
call
that
maybe
aren't
familiar
with
the
dna
badging
program.
So
we
have
dni
event
metrics,
so
they're
metrics.
A
That
events
can
consider
when
thinking
about
dni
in
the
work
that
they're
doing
and
the
events
can
apply
for
a
diversity
and
inclusion
badge
and
the
review
process
is
done
in
an
open
and
transparent
way,
so
that
we
can
kind
of
constructively
work
towards
trying
to
understand
and
document
how
events
are
attending
to
things
like
speaker,
demographics
or
attendee,
demographics,
family
friendliness,
diversity,
access
tickets
and
a
code
of
conduct.
At
the
event,
I
think
that's
the
full
list
isn't
that
right,
matt.
A
Think
so
so
it's
been,
it's
actually
been
going
really
really
really
well.
We
just
got
our
fifth
request
from
openjs
world
yesterday
so
and
it's
been
a
very
productive
process.
I'd
say
to
to
this
point
really
constructive
and
a
lot
of
great
reviews.
I
think
the
events
are
quite
happy
with
the
process.
Is
that
your
take
mat,
that's
kind
of
the
sense
I
get.
B
A
A
I
think
we
have
to
legitimately
think
about
this,
and
I
put
the
list
of
current
reviewers
here.
Somebody
put
more
on
the
way,
so
ruth
has
been
great.
Niaphatos
has
been
great,
anita's
been
great,
so
these
are
a
lot
of
really
good
people.
Matt.
Do
you
have
comments
on
this.
B
Yeah
sean
reached
out
to
elizabeth
and
is
coming
into
the
review
system,
actually,
probably
today,
as
long
as
the
orientation
goes
well
and
then
we
have
another
person,
that's
also
interested
in
being
a
reviewer
that
I've
been
reaching
out
to,
or
we've
been
talking
to.
So
we
have
more
on
the
way.
How
many
would
that
add
to
the
list
here?
Just
two
just
two
yeah
well,
not
just
two.
A
C
I
had
one
more
person
reach
out
that
was
looking
for
more
information
on
how
it
all
worked,
and
I
did
not
hear
back
from
them,
so
I
might
just
touch
base
with
them
again.
I
don't
know
if
the
if
it
was
a
little
too
overwhelming
for
them
or
or
what
kind
of
was
the
the
blocker
but
I'll
see.
If
I
can
find
out.
A
Okay-
and
I
think
so
that
would
be
two
to
three
then
potentially
new
reviewers.
I
don't
think
we
should
really
let
up
on
this
so
matt
or
elizabeth.
Do
you
have
additional
thoughts
as
to
how
we
can
continue
to
recruit
people
in
this
regard,
because
I
know
that
elizabeth
you
had
posted
it
on
the
list,
the
diversity
and
inclusion
list.
That
justin
is,
I
think,
managing.
A
C
From
a
post
on
twitter,
so
I
think
maybe
just
continuing
to
do
that
periodically
like
I
don't
want
to
be
a
nag
or
obnoxious
about
it.
So
we
need
to
be
careful.
You
know,
but.
C
Also
reach
out
to
individual
groups
like
people
that
women
who
code
or
or
other
groups
like
that,
if
there's
anyone,
that's
interested.
D
Okay,
I
I'm
not
volunteering,
so
I'm
sorry
from
interrupting,
but
how
does
it
take
about
an
hour
to
train
somebody.
B
Yeah
I'd
say
like
one
to
two
but
yeah
that
happens.
It
should
happen
a
lot
more.
Rarely
once
we
have
the
review
more
reviewers
in
place.
A
D
Okay,
I'm
processing
to
to
be
able
to
give
some
comments
later
on
perfect.
Okay,.
A
That's
great
because
the
challenge
here
lawrence
is
that
with
dni
we
really
want
it
not
to
be
like
just
an
automated
process,
but
somebody
providing
human
reflection
on
the
efforts,
and
so
we
just
we
need
people
kind
of
like
an
academic
review.
We
need
people
to
kind
of
reflect
on
what
the
events
are
saying,
how
they're
kind
of
representing
these
these
issues
and
to
make
it
kind
of
a
constructive
process.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
here.
A
Okay,
so
elizabeth
you
had
mentioned,
is
it
girls
who
code.
C
Off
the
top
of
my
head,
there's
there's
numerous
of
those
kinds
of
groups
that
tailor
to
diversity
and
inclusion,
efforts
in
technology
and
open
source,
so
I
think
that
they
might
have
some
good
candidates
that
care
about
this
stuff
and
want
to
make
the
world
a
better
place
in
that
way.
Okay,.
A
A
F
E
E
You
know
genuine
feedback
and
it's
hard
to
teach
people
that
that's
the
aim
with
just
like
a
document,
so
there
will
probably
have
to
be
some
high
contact
like
15
minutes
of
that
with
each
new
reviewer.
I
would
think.
A
At
this
point,
the
answer
would
be
yes,
I
mean
we
haven't,
put
a
limitation
on
who
could
be
a
reviewer,
you
know
so
if
people
have
an
interest
in
being
part
of
that
process,
so
it
is
in
short,
to
answer
your
question.
Yes,
that's
possible,
but
we
haven't
done
that
yet.
Okay,
I
mean
that's.
That's
right!
That's
again
like
if
I
liken
this
to
the
academic
review
process
right.
That's
the
old
trick
right,
look
for
people
who
have
submitted
papers
to
your
journal
and
then
and
then
consider.
D
B
Yeah,
I
care
a
lot
about
onboarding.
That's
one
of
my
big
things
is
that
I
really
like
to
make
sure
that
people
feel
welcome
when
they
come
into
a
new
event.
I
might
it
might
be
worth
asking
them
about
their
experience
afterward,
but
during
the
orientation
session
I
do
try
to
be
as
personal
as
possible
when
it
comes
to
like
answering
questions
or
or
being
being
a
human.
B
What
and
explaining
things
to
people
and
saying
like
this
may
need
work
done
or
we're
doing
a
release
pretty
soon
here
in
march
stuff,
like
that
to
make
sure
that
they
want
to
do
it,
this
this
review
process
and
we'll
commit
to
it.
B
A
I'm
thinking
too,
to
sean's
point.
Maybe
you
could
signal
that,
like
during
a
review
process,
if
a
reviewer
has
a
question
on
how
to
respond,
you
know
what
I
mean
like.
What's
the
appropriate,
I
have
I'm
happy
to
talk
to.
You
know,
provide
guidance.
I'm
sure
elizabeth
would
too
speaking
on
your
behalf,
elizabeth,
but
you
know
just
how
to
kind
of
mat.
You
too
you've
seen
this
often
enough
now
right
that
also
signaling
to
potential
reviewers
that
you
know.
B
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that.
I
think
so
that's
something
we
need
to
push
more
when
we
do
the
orientation
I've
got
one
today,
so
it
would
be
a
good,
a
good
primer,
but
to
say
like
if
you
have
questions
be
you're
totally
welcome
to
ask
those
questions
in
a
public
or
private
space.
Basically,
but
but
to
just
be
curious,
is
really
important
in
this
process.
Yes,
and
we're
there
to
support
you
through
the
process
as
you're
learning.
E
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
support
would
that
that
message
of
support
will
will
help.
I
I
think
it's
hard
to
be
kind
and
thoughtful,
but
also
at
times
critical,
to
help
an
organization
improve
or
advance
it's
it's
an
art
form
and
it
doesn't.
It
didn't
come
naturally
to
me,
and
I
think
it
doesn't
come
naturally
to
most
people
to
to
offer
that
critique.
You
know,
suggestions
for
improvement
as
those
things
occur,
and
so,
knowing
you
can
call
on
someone
who's
experienced
in
how
this
works,
I
think,
will
be
enormously
helpful.
B
I
agree
with
both
you,
sean
and
and
justin
here
saying
faqs
we've
got
actually
so
we
had
when
we
were
first
doing
the
pilot
studies
or
pilot.
You
know
situations
we
we
had
an
faq
section,
that's
actually
still
there,
but
it's
kind
of
needs,
more
visibility
on
for
the
reviewers
and
the
moderators
perspective.
B
I
think
it's
a
good
thing
to
add
things
too.
Yeah.
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
thank
you
every
this
is
a
really
good
talk,
because
I
think
this
is
a
very
critical
issue
and
one
I
think,
matt
you
had
made
a
comment.
Maybe
I
don't
know
if
it
was
just
to
me
or
in
some
other
call,
but
like
we,
I
don't
think
we
can
be
too
prepared
in
this
area
right.
It's
not
a
bad
thing
to
have
too
many
reviewers
that
are
committed
and
to
this
effort.
A
So
it's
a
good
thing
I
did,
I
did
wonder,
is
there
anything
that
we
should
be
thinking
about
with
respect
to
incentivizing
reviewers?
A
So
you
know
how
like
we
do
the
podcasts
like
elizabeth,
you
send
out
people
who
do
the
podcast.
I
think
they
get
a
handwritten
note
and
a
sticker.
You
know
and
just
a
small
bit
of
outreach.
B
A
C
B
B
C
So
I
can
send
you
that
if
you
like-
and
I
I
can't
imagine
that
it
would
be
a
huge
number
of
ones
that
you
would
have
to
send
out,
I
mean
like
that.
We're
talking,
you
know
like
a
handful
of
people,
so
it
shouldn't
be
terrible.
Well,.
B
We
have
a
little
bit
of
lead
time.
Do
we
want
to
use
some
kind
of
funds
to
order
a
chaos
greeting
cards?
We
could
use
for
multiple
purposes.
A
C
Yeah,
a
poker
chip
that
is
specific
to
chaos,
cast
a
little
note,
that's
specific
to
chaos
cast
and
some
chaos
cast
stickers,
so
I
think,
there's
also
a
chaos
sticker
nah.
No,
I
take
that
back.
It's
just
chaos
cast
stuff,
but
if
we
had
more
generic
chaos
stuff,
that
would
be
amazing
and
I
think
we
could
use
it
for
a
wide
variety
purposes,
because
we
do
have
quite
a
lot
of
volunteers
across
the
organization.
C
I
would
love
to
see
like
something
cool
that
we
you
know
could
send,
even
if
it's
for,
like
you
volunteered
for
the
badging
program,
so
you
get
this
one
sticker
and
then,
if
you
volunteer
for
something
else,
you
get
a
different
sticker.
You
know,
like
you
kind
of
collect
them.
All
kind
of
things
sounds.
B
So
I'm
thinking
I've
always
had
this
idea
and
we've
got
an
svg
of
it
actually
that
saul
made,
but
it's
a
dni,
badging
and
there's
the
purple
and
it
says
ally
that
we
that
we
can
turn
into
a
sticker.
That's
just
my
my
personal
opinion,
but
I'll
look
into
this
elizabeth.
You
want
to
look
into
this
with
me
and
figure
out
what
we
can
do.
B
A
Then
you
can
loot
me
into
that
too,
because
I
would
have
the
funds
okay
and
it
would
be
in
it,
and
I
think
maybe
two
it's
easiest.
If
we
keep
things
that
are
able
to
be
put
in
just
regular
envelopes
that
don't
require
a
trip
to
the
post
office,
you
know
all
right
cool,
so
I
don't
know
somebody.
Let's
see
matt,
I'm
taking.
A
A
We
could
even
I
mean
I
was
thinking
we
could
extend
it
so
that
if
an
individual
you
know
has
over
10
events
badged
or
something
like
that,
I
don't
know
you
know
people
who
are
really
participating,
not
just
reviewers
but
are
also
participating
in
the
program.
Okay,
cool,
any
other
comments
on
dna
badging.
I
really
wanted
to
address
this
and
just
kind
of
make
sure
we're
all
kind
of
moving
in
a
really
positive
way.
A
Doing
some
more
direct
outreach
would
be
great
solicit,
open
source
diversity.
I'm
reading
justin's
comment.
A
F
F
Yeah
so
there's
a
forum,
but
also
a
more
active
telegram
and
signal
chat
for
the
groups
that
I
could
share.
Some
outreach
in
just
knowing
what
the
call
to
action
to
make
is
would
be
helpful
so
like
share
the
right
links
or
make
sure
that
I'm
pointing
people
the
right
way.
That
would
be
helpful
and
maybe
just
a
little
bit
about
the
program
like
what
the
commitments
are.
F
Don't
you,
but
I
know
there
would
definitely
be
at
least
a
couple
folks
who
would
probably
want
to
learn
more,
so
I'm
happy
to
make
those
plugs
or
if
someone
else
wants
to
do
them.
Sometimes
I
think
it's
more
exciting
when
someone
other
than
me
posts
on
that
forum,
but
hey
I'm
happy
to
do
it
either
way.
A
Call
to
action
that
kind
of
stuff-
okay,
great!
Thank
you
thank
you
for
offering
that
justin
all
right
so
moving
on
I'm
down
at
this
part.
So
with
respect
to
a
lot
of
you
are
familiar,
we're
doing,
dni
reflection
on
the
chaos
project
itself,
so
taking
a
look
at
our
own
dna
practices
and
looking
to
capture
this,
so
other
projects
can
do
this
type
of
reflection
as
well.
A
We've
been
talking
about
this
for
a
while,
so
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
pretty
familiar
with
this
and
I
honestly
just
a
special
thanks
to
justin,
hey
justin,
I'm
clapping
for
you
who
has
agreed
to
serve
as
the
liaison
between
kind
of
the
chaos
community
and
the
external
reviewers.
I
think
it
was
really
important
that
we
have
a
person
who
is
familiar.
A
A
G
To
it
right
on-
and
I
have
a
terrible
connection
now,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
I'm
not
sure,
I'm
never
sure
about
when
I'm
kind
of
here
you
just.
D
If
you
guys
could
look
at
it
for
a
second
go
to
section
three,
there
should
be
two
or
three
questions,
and
I
basically
was
looking
at
some
of
the
metrics
that
we
were
working
on.
While
I
created
these
two
or
three
questions,
and
basically
they
have
to
do
adversity.
That's
specifically,
why
I'm
showing
you
this
in
this
conversation,
I'm
not
and,
and
then
the
next
part
of
this.
This
conversation
is
some
of
the
pull
requests.
So
that's
why
I'm
bringing
it
up
here?
Okay,.
A
D
Of
mine
so
side
lift
as
a
of
maintainers
people
who
maintain
projects
yep
and
so
section
three
is
starts.
Do
you
think
that
open
source
suffers
from
a
lack
of
diversity?
I
don't
that's
whatever
it
is.
The
next
question
is
which
of
the
which
are
the
following
ways:
are
the
best
ways
to
to
improve
diversity.
D
D
He
now
was
saying
you
were
going
to
think
about
how
we
could
work
with
people
externally.
One
of
the
things
I
was
looking
at
here
was.
D
What
do
we
ask,
I
don't
know.
One
of
the
things
I
was
struggling
with
is
in
terms
of
actually
dealing
with
the
accessibility
issues,
so
accessibility
for
the
documentation,
diverse
inclusivity
of
information
and
communication,
and
how
do
we
actually.
D
Validate
that,
let's
say,
chaos
is
doing
something
about
that,
and
accessibility
was
a
big
issue,
because
how
do
we
get?
How
do
you
do
stuff?
That's
besides,
just
saying
that
it's
a
machine,
readable,
that's
dealing
with
people
with
sight
impairments
versus
other
other
accessibility
issues,.
A
D
Are
these
are
questions
that,
if
you
have,
if
you
think,
they're
bad
questions
or
you
have
feedback,
tell
me
them
they're
going
to
go,
live
in
a
couple
days?
Okay,
but
these
are
things
to
steal
from
their
open
source
questions.
D
They're
open
source
questions-
I
I
mean
honestly
this
is
I
I
I
take.
I
I'm
I
look.
I
took
the
questions
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
from
frank
nagle
and
the
linux
foundation
harvard
project
I've
been
building
on
things
over
time.
I
try
to
use
as
much
a
similar
question
framework
as
possible.
D
No,
and
so
we
could
move
on,
I
just
want
to
share.
D
Sorry,
I'll,
let
you
go
back
to
your
agenda.
I
totally.
A
You
were
absolutely
yep,
so
right
now
so
we're
into
the
metrics
review
period.
So
this
is
just
so.
People
know
right
the
chaos
project
releases
metrics
on
a
twice
a
year,
cadence
and
as
part
of
that
cadence,
the
working
groups
put
metrics
forward
right
and
then
there's
a
comment
period
where
people
provide
comments
or
provide
feedback
on
the
metrics,
and
we
try
to
work
to
incorporate
that
feedback
or
take
that
feedback
as
it
might
be
more
appropriate
in
a
second
metric.
You
know
what
I
mean:
we
try
to
kind
of
work
through.
A
A
C
F
Connections
like
even
though
like
there
is
a
valid
point
there
that,
yes,
like
irc,
does
not
necessarily
have
persistent
connections
by
default.
Unless
you
use
something
like
a
bouncer.
The
point
to
me
is
still
valid
that
it's
about
synchronous
communication,
real-time
chat,
even
in
irc,
even
if
you
might
not
always
have
persistent
connections-
and
maybe
you
can't
follow
up
with
someone
right
away,
you're
still
having
conversations
usually
in
real
time
versus
something
like
a
mailing.
C
A
So
do
you
think
the
comment
here
is
still
captured
effectively
in
the
metric
and
it
might
just
be
a
wording
issue.
F
I'd
be
curious
to
know
like
if
rey
has
like
a
specific
thought
on
like.
Is
there
something,
inclusive
or
not
inclusive,
about
platforms
with
persistent
connections
or
not
like
there
might
be
a
degree
of
truth
there,
but
it
would
just
be
helpful
to
know
like
what
is
he
thinking
about
specifically
or
could
he
unpack
that
a
little
bit
more
okay?
So.
A
Maybe
like
just
adding
like,
is
there
a
specific
area
in
the
metric.
F
Around
like
persistent
or
non-persistent
connections
like
if
that's
something
that
he
thinks
we
should
look
at
more
closely
and
why-
or
at
least
that's
my
question
at
least
I
just
like
I'm
just
curious,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
like
what
issue.
Does
he
see
around
chat
platforms
with
persistent
connections,
and
is
there
a
way
we
can
better
address
that.
G
A
D
Think
I
think
that's
fine,
I
just
it
might
help
locate
it
a
little
bit.
That's
all.
I
think,
in
my
opinion,
that's
if
you
know
maybe
it's
not
there's
two
different
questions.
One
is:
is
the
communication
platform
an
obstacle
to
involvement
in
the
project?
D
D
D
Than
looking
specifically
at
chat
platforms
itself,
so
reason
why
I'm
saying
the
type
of
communication
method
is
because
just
looking
at
it
through
a
spectrum
of
email,
video,
a
chat,
there's
a
spectrum
of
different
ways
to
communicate,
and
when
we're
asking
is
it?
Is
it
a
persistent
connection
or
not?
That's
just
that's
just
along
the
spectrum
of
the
technologies
and.
D
D
D
D
D
A
That's
good.
I.
C
So
I
think
like
like
here
at
chaos.
We
have
you
know
our
our
face-to-face
calls.
We
have
the
mailing
list,
we
have
issues
and
it
is
a
lot,
but
also,
I
think
it
allows
people
to
engage
in
different
ways
and
and
whatever
works
for
them.
So
I
I
don't
know
that
we're
necessarily
making
a
judgment
on
like
what
the
golden
number
of
communication
platforms
should
be.
I
think
we're
just
asking
them
to
be
aware
of
it
and
to
like
enumerate
it
in
some
way
to
help
their
own
awareness
of
what
they're
doing
is.
C
Is
that
right?
That
was
kind
of
my
take
on
why
we
asked
this
question
in
the
first
place,
not
to
pass
the
judgment
just
to
like
put
it
out
there,
so
that
they
kind
of
keep
track
of
it
because
they
may
not
even
realize
if
they
you
know
have
ten,
they
may
not,
it
might
sneak
up
on
them.
You
know
so
I
don't
know
just
my
take.
A
C
A
All
right
cool,
thank
you,
justin
and
thank
you
lawrence
and
thank
you,
elizabeth.
Let's,
let's
maybe
see
what
ray
comes
back
with
on
this
and
we'll
just
kind
of
take
it
one
step
at
a
time
before
we
widen
it
out
too
much
all
right.
B
A
Where
what
is
this?
The
release
candidate
at
yeah,
okay,
can.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
everybody,
the
next
one.
A
A
And
so
maybe
adding
a
few
questions
to
the
matrix
about
documentation
associated
with,
say
software
installation
procedures
or
documentation
associated
with
how
you
would
do
feature
development
or
architecture
overview
or
user
guides.
These
kind
of
things
right,
this
one
is
pretty
pretty
straightforward
to
me-
seems
valid.
D
A
D
Oh
yeah,
it
was
just
difference
between
information,
accessibility
and
document
accessibility,
as
I
probably
wasn't
in
a
in
a
meeting
where
you
probably
already
covered
this
this.
This
meeting
took
like
this
is
like
a
year-long
meeting.
A
D
A
Yeah,
just
I
we're
slowly
working
away,
so
at
one
point
I
think
we
had
just
like
documentation
as
its
own
metric
and
we
quickly
realized
that
yeah
that's
a
little
too
broad
and
it's
been
surprising
how
at
least
to
me
how
challenging
thinking
through
issues
related
to
documentation
has
been
so.
A
Maybe
that's
all
I'll
say
to
that.
It's
just
it's
been
surprising.
How
much
there
is
behind
behind
documentation.
D
A
Well
in
in
maybe
two,
this
was
kind
of
the
point
too,
that
I
I
don't
know
if
you
caught
this
earlier
lawrence,
but
like
sometimes
when
we're
doing
reviews
on
the
metrics.
If,
if
documentation,
accessibility
isn't
quite
capturing
what
you
think
it
should
be
captured,
it
might
result
in
a
candidate
for
another
metric.
A
D
D
A
I
just
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
the
doors
open
to
continue
to
think
through
these
things.
So
all
right,
okay,
good,
stop!
My
share.
I
always
stop
my
share
when
I
move
tabs,
it's
a
habit
when
things
are
being
recorded,
all
right,
so
maybe
the
last
one,
and
I
think
this
will
maybe
be
it
for
the
day.
A
A
A
So
I
think
maybe
what
came
up
could
somebody
remind
me,
elizabeth
or
justin
or
amy,
who
was
ever
on
the
call
last
week
with
respect
to
the
comments
that
you
were
bringing
forward
lawrence,
I
think
our
goal
was
to
get
the
current
state
of
project
burnout
largely
released,
basically
released
as
part
of
this
review
cycle,
because
the
comments
that
you
make
are
are
fairly
substantive.
A
Is
that
the
right
word
I
feel
like?
I
said
that
word
too
long,
but
and
really
start
addressing
your
points.
Your
comments
more
point
by
point
and
maybe
breaking
it
out
into
a
couple
different
pr's
that
we
could
start
really
thinking
about
project
burnout
as
an
evolving
metric
after
the
next
release.
Does
that
make
sense
cause
there
were
some
fairly
some
some
fairly
substantial
changes,
I'll
use.
That
word,
because
I
know
that's
the
right
word.
D
Yes,
and
simply
plays
yes,
is.
D
D
Take
each
sect
take
each
section,
take
the
questions
and
the
long
list
of
questions
make
them
into
something
that
could
be
copy
pasted
by
people
yep
and
just.
D
D
I
was
just
trying
to
to
to
combine
a
couple
of
the
questions
to
make
it
that
you
would
put
in
there,
but
honestly
I
faced
the
same
problem.
Basically,
the
question.
A
lot
of
the
issues
are
project
burnout
is,
is
a
is
an
outcome
in
a
lot
of
ways
and
a
lot
in
a
lot
of
these
things.
D
We're
measuring
that
that
what
causes
project
burnout
instead
of
what,
instead
of
okay
so
you're
measuring
cause,
are
you
measuring
the
cause
or
the
effect
so,
but
we
have
to
do
both.
That's
okay!
So
I'm!
Okay,
if
you,
if
you
pause
things,
I'm
not
I
basically
that
dc
I
got
messed
up
by
dco.
I
had
never.
I
obviously
had
to
have
to.
A
D
I
tried
multiple,
I
tried
multiple
browsers
and
I
basically
did
nothing
nothing
and
that's
so.
I
spent
like
four
or
five
hours
trying
to
do
that
on
two
different
in
over
two
different
days
and
I
basically
ended
up
just
having
to
install
github
desktop
and
have
it
I'm
like.
Okay.
Well,
I'm
not
a
developer,
so
I'm
like
okay
well,.
B
D
Did
wrong-
and
I
still
don't
know,
but
it
inspired
me
to
write
a
little
article
about
it.
I
don't
know
what
just
go
back.
I
don't
I
pasted
something
at
the
bottom
of
this
notes.
I
from
linux.
D
Foundation
and
harvard
report
the
relevant
chat
pr.
I
put
two
two
questions:
the
results
from
two
charts
from
two
questions
at
the
bottom
of
this
week
and
basically
just
looks
about
how
different
communication
methods
are
being
used
by
fast
projects.
A
Well,
this
was
we
are
at
the
end
of
our
time
folks.
This
was
super
productive,
just
quick
recap:
again:
dna
badging
making
progress
there
justin
super
happy
to
have
you
be
part
of
the
team
with
respect
to
dna
reflection
and
then
great
to
get
through
some
of
these
comments
on
the
metrics
that
are
going
through
the
release
period.
So
we
didn't
make
it
through
anything
else
and
ruth
it's
good
to
see
you
and
anita,
it's
good
to
see
you
and
amy.
I
hope
your
chickens
are
doing
all
right.