►
From YouTube: CHAOSS DEI Working Group 1/12/22
Description
Links to minutes from this meeting are on https://chaoss.community/participate.
A
Just
what's
up
everybody,
I
know
all
of
you,
so
it's
good
to
see
you
all.
B
A
I
know
you're
all
doing
doing
well
in
2022,
so
just
a
few
things
wait
january:
12th,
oh
whoops,
okay,
so
I
made
a
mistake.
A
A
So
there
were
a
few
things,
and
maybe
I
just
get
your
thoughts
on
on
these.
So
of
course
welcome
back.
We
have
the
I
put
those
goals
back
in
for
2022.
I
think
a
lot
of
this
first
couple
meetings
are
going
to
be
just
with
goal
oriented
stuff.
A
And
we
have
that
elizabeth,
you
know
so
from
the
dei
audit
group.
We
have
a
series
of
recommendations
and
some,
I
think,
we've
actually
kind
of
done
and
some
were
in
progress,
but
some
may
need
some
attention.
A
So
one
is
that
community
inclusion
survey.
I
think
we
should
probably
make
it
we
have
it.
It's
done.
I
think
we're.
A
B
A
B
A
To
continue
to
it's
not
like,
we
need
the
survey
results
for
like
a
paper
right,
we're
trying
to
do
it
to
understand
how
people
are
feeling
included
in
the
project,
and
so
I
mean
honestly.
Maybe
we
could
just
kind
of
keep
it
perpetually
open
if
we
can,
if
we
can
see,
I
don't
know
something
like
that.
I
just
would
we
can
keep
it
open
for
a
long
time.
That's
what
I
think
so.
Yeah.
B
B
A
Well,
I'd
even
be
like,
because
again
this
it's
not
scientific,
at
least
to
me
so
like
if,
if
matt
cantu
like
filled
it
out,
I'm
just
looking
at
you
matt,
like
you,
filled
it
out
in
january,
like
you're
feeling
good
about
inclusivity,
but
then
come
march.
You
want
to
fill
it
out
again
because
you're
not
you're,
not
feeling
so
good
yeah.
C
C
A
B
A
A
B
C
I
don't
know
it
was
the
process
by
which
we
carry
out
actions
in
the
cast
project
and
like
how
we
do
things.
I
think
the
the
ambiguity
was
found
in
that
we
have
like
a
lot
of
things
that
we
do,
that
aren't
necessarily
documented
in
how
we
do
them.
B
B
E
B
B
So
I
showed
her
the
community
handbook
and
she
had
been
already
looking
through
it
and
advised
her
to
or
encouraged
her.
I
should
say
to
you
know
anything:
she
saw
to
like
open
an
issue
or
submit
a
pr
but
she's
very,
very
new,
and
she
was
like
I
just
am
really
trying
to.
You
know
get
my
get
my
bearings
so,
but
that
might
be
something
that
we
could
have
some
of
our
newer
folks.
E
B
Like
hey
read
this
tell
us
what
doesn't
make
sense
tell
us,
you
know
what
needs
clarified
or
if
you
see
something,
that's
missing
that
you're
looking
for
like
maybe
make
it
more
of
a
deliberate
project,
a
deliberate
effort
that
we
can
funnel
some
of
these
newcomers
in
that
are
looking
to
contribute
and
also
want
to
learn
about
chaos.
So
that
might
be
helpful.
I.
A
Like
that,
could
we
what
would
you
think
about
like
including
a
senior
member
of
the
or
like
an
experienced
member
of
chaos
as
well
like
I
was
just
thinking
myself
like.
I
would
be
happy
to
go
through
the
handbook
like
just
like
just
start
on
page
one.
You
know
what
I
mean
just
start
reading
it
and
I
read
it
and
I'm
like
yeah
that
I
know
for
a
fact
that
that
process
is
not
right
or
right.
You
know
like.
I
would
know
that
and
I'm
guessing
that
the
newcomers
are
like.
A
B
A
Maybe
in
the
repo
you
may
be
in
the
repo,
so
maybe
I'll
take
an
action
item
on
this.
I've
been
meaning
to
do
this
for
a
long
time,
because
it
was
really
georg
and
joshua
yeah.
A
Who
really
did
a
big
push
on
the
on
the
handbook
in
the
first
place,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
us
were
kind
of
cursorily
looking
at
the
work
that
was
done
and
derek
knows
what
he
I
mean,
they
both
know
what
they're
doing
so,
it's
not
like,
there's
probably
going
to
be
big
mistakes
in
it,
but
it's
like
reading
a
paper
after
you
wrote
it.
B
Re
it's.
The
person
that
had
reached
out
was
rhea
shall
not.
E
B
Source
program
office
that
hewlett
packard.
B
A
A
Okay,
why
don't?
Let's
do
that?
Maybe
in
two
phases,
then
so
I'll
start
going
through
the
handbook?
It's
not
very
big.
I
mean
it
doesn't
take
terribly
long
to
get
through.
Okay,
okay,
cool,
hey,
justin!
We
have
a
question
for
you
lucky
lucky,
for
you
sure
the
the
inclusion
survey
are.
We
is
that
ready
to
go
out,
because
we
had
talked
about
doing
that
in
2022.
E
Yep-
and
I
remember
I
met
with
ruth
one
on
one-
I'm
pretty
sure
we-
we
updated
it
from
all
the
feedback
that
we
had.
So
I
think
it's
it's
in
a
place
where
it's
ready
to
run.
It
just
gets
to
have
some
folks
who
would
not
want
to
help.
E
I
think
we
need
to
figure
out
like
data
access,
first
of
all,
actually
just
in
terms
of
legality
and
who
has
access
to
the
results
and
whether
they're
anonymized
from
there,
then
we
could
easily
start
to
plug
people
in
with
the
right
access.
We
could
also
give
people
rights
to
help
administer
things
without
giving
them
access
to
the
responses
as
well.
So
there
are
some
options
here
for
how
we,
how
we
want
to
try
to
bring
people
in
on
this
too.
A
Okay,
so
so
the
survey
itself
like
technically
it
should
be
ready
to
go
from
what
it
sounds
like
like
to
destruction-wise.
Yes,
okay
and
then
the
questions
remain
as
to
who
would
have
one
of
two
things:
administrative
access
to
the
survey
and
then
data
access
to
the
results.
Is
that
correct.
B
I
I
have
a
question
that
is
related
to
this.
What
did
we
decide
about
doing
a
dei
council.
B
A
A
C
E
And
probably
thinking
about
like
future
proofing
too
just
what
that
participation
looks
like
and
if
other
people
like
can
get
onboarded
with
that
too
or
if
it's.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
thing
to
try
to
try
to
maybe
map
out,
maybe
both
with
this
working
group
and
the
audit.
The
foreign
group.
A
B
B
B
Justin
we
also
had
been
talking
before
you
joined
about
keeping
the
survey
open
just
like
open-ended,
for
you
know,
anyone
who
maybe
comes
to
the
project
after
the
survey
was
sent
out
originally
or
people
who,
like
matt,
said,
might
be
fine
right
now,
but
in
like
six
months,
might
not
be
fine
and
like
would.
We
would
want
to
know
that
sooner
than
later,
and
not
have
to
have
them
wait
until
the
surveys
open
again
and
then
just
periodically
review
the
results.
What
do
you
think
about
that?.
E
I
think
it's
a
really
interesting
approach,
but
I
might
split
it
up
into
two
different
ways.
I
think
the
work
that
we
have
around,
like
that
contact
form
and
getting
in
touch
with
someone
is
that
something
that
I
remember
we
had
talked
about
that
like
having
a
way
to
like
get
to
know
like
ask
someone,
questions
and
email
or
or
chat.
B
E
B
No,
no
totally
fine,
we
were
just
thinking
like
it
might
be
interesting
to
keep
that
inclusion
survey
open,
not
just
like
close
it
off,
and
so
that
way
it
could
be
open
just
open-ended
anytime.
You
want
to
fill
that
out.
You
fill
that
out.
So
if
you
come
into
the
community
after
we've
sent
it,
you
have
to
wait
another
year
or
if
you
you
know,
if
your
perceptions
change
or
your
feelings
change,
you
don't
have
to
wait
another
year
to
express
them.
So
we
were
just
curious.
E
I
think
that
would
be
better
to
get
the
rolling
the
rolling
feedback
all
the
time
and
then
for
this,
at
least
for
this
first
time
we
could
definitely
revisit
for
other.
You
know
iterative
surveys,
but
I
think
for
this
first
one
having
a
concerted
like
marketing
campaign
and
really
trying
to
get
a
drive
out
for
people
to
fill
out
these
the
survey
over
a
time
like
a
certain
time
period
over
a
single
month,
just
to
get
that
initial.
B
E
B
E
B
So
maybe
our
thinking
is
maybe
we
shouldn't
record
this
because
it's
secret,
but
maybe
our
thinking
is
that
we,
like
long
term
plan
to
leave
it
open,
but
like
for
the
initial
one
week,
we
don't
make
that
as
well
known
or
something
like
that,
like
we
give
a
date
but
then
like
maybe
we
can
you
know
our
long-term
thinking
is
we
will
leave
it
open
later
than
that?
I
don't
know,
maybe
not.
E
I
have
a
feeling
too,
once
we
get
that
first
run
of
responses,
and
we
go
through
some
of
this
and
get
some
of
those
insights.
We
will
probably
have
more
other
feelings
and
ideas
on
this
too.
So
maybe.
A
A
Oh,
we
do
time
bound
the
initial
survey,
whatever
that
time
box
is
and
that
elizabeth
would
be
the
only
person
who
would
have
access
to
the
results-
and
we
all
have
total
faith
in
elizabeth
to
kind
of
draw
out
what
the
recurring
themes
are
or
what
the
points
of
concern
are
that
we
should
probably
address
within
the
chaos
community
or
things
that
are
working
really
well,
and
we
want
to
continue
to
highlight
that
are
working
the
project.
Okay,
great.
A
C
You
know,
honestly,
in
this
content
a
context.
This
is
just
my
opinion,
but
I
think
it'd
be
better
to
set
a
goal
for
effort,
or
hours
worked
on
this
than
it
would
be
to
set
a
goal
for
responses,
because
responses
can
just
be
so
variable
and
we
do.
We
have
no
frame
of
reference
here.
B
We
we
have
a
hard
time
sorting
out
people
who
are
subscribed
to
us
or
connect
with
us
in
multiple
channels.
Also
so
like
we
have
a
lot
of
people
on
slack,
but
we
also
have
a
lot
of
people
on
the
same.
You
know
the
same
people
that
are
on
the
mailing
list,
so
it's
challenging
for
us
to
kind
of
nail
down
what
an
accurate
number
of
people
in
our
community
really
is.
So
I
think
that
would
make
it
all
so
challenging.
I
don't.
B
E
The
reason
I
ask
is
because
one
thing
that
I've
seen
knowing
that
at
least
with
this
current
approach,
so
we
do
the
survey
and
then
there'll
be
a
huge,
well,
the
variable
amount
of
work
that
would
come
after
that,
for
you,
elizabeth
to
go
through
the
data
and
try
to
abstract
it
out
or
or
share
some
kind
of
output
from
that.
So
I
was
asking
about
a
goal
for
number
of
responses,
because
thinking
about
what'll
come
after
I've
seen
it
before,
where
some
people
who
do
these
surveys,
then
you
get.
E
E
Are
we
shooting
for
like
100
responses
or
20,
because
each
of
those,
if
it's
only
one
person,
who's
going
to
be
reviewing
each
of
those
responses
that
maybe
we
want
to
think
about
breaking
this
up
or
finding
another
person
to
split
the
responses
with?
So
just
kind
of
thinking
out
loud
like
that,
might
help
to
frame
also
some
of
this
like
post
survey
like
then,
what
what
do
we
do?
E
B
Yeah,
it
definitely
does
make
sense
and
honestly,
I'm
not
sure
I
mean
a
piece
of
me
is
like
well,
we
can
wait
and
see,
and
if
it's,
oh,
my
gosh,
we
have
100
responses
to
this
thing
and
it's
going
to
take
me.
You
know
20
hours
to
go
through
it.
Then
we
can
solve
that
problem
when
it
happens,
but
I
I
don't
know
that
we
would
get
that.
Many
like
I
mean
our
community,
I
would
say,
is
probably
max
what
250
300
people
max.
B
If
I
had
to
guess-
and
you
know
a
lot
of
those-
are
only
periodic
contributors
or
episodic
contributors.
So,
like
my
feeling
right
now
is
that
it
I
could
handle
it.
But
again
you
know
until
it
happens,
I
don't
know.
C
Okay,
I
kind
of
get
where
you're
coming
from
now
justin,
so
it
would
be
like
at
what
number
I
guess
this
is
a
question
for
you,
elizabeth.
What
number
would
you
see
in
the
responses
category
of
like
the
survey
report
and
say?
Oh,
I
need
some
more
help
on
this.
B
I
think,
like
I
would
say,
maybe.
B
Because
it's
not
like
we're
responding
to
each
individual
person,
it's
just
looking
at
the
data
and
reading
through
any
of
the
comments
and
then
putting
it
together.
So
I
think
50.
What
do
you
I
mean?
Does
that
seem
reasonable.
C
E
Looking
back
at
the
questions
that
we
have
here
in
the
the
google
sheet,
I
might
have
to
double
check
the
form
to
see
if
we
had
any
free
response
like
question
like
at
the
end,
like
share
anything
that
you
wanted
to
say
we,
maybe
we
added
that,
but
looking
at
the
doc
here
with
the
questions,
it's
mostly
straightforward
things,
we
didn't
ask
a
lot
of
open-ended
questions
or
no,
we
asked
two.
What
was
something.
E
Communities
lack
and
you
wish
you
didn't
when
you
first
started
working
with
the
community.
What
are
some
obstacles
you
encountered?
The
rest
are
all
either
like
radio
button
choices
or
the
like
or
scale
with
emojis.
E
So
I
I
think
it
would
be
like
you
know,
of
course,
some
people
are
going
to
do
like
the
bare
minimum,
and
some
people
will
do
write
you
an
essay,
but
I
I
feel
like
that.
It
wouldn't
be
so
much
where
it's
like
when
you
have
all
those
open-ended
questions,
that's
where
things
can
get
a
little
bit
tied.
D
B
A
A
B
Have
those
those
all
in
meetings,
so
I'm
gonna
change
a
day,
but
I'm
not
sure
yet.
So
I
need
to
look
at
my
schedule
but
yeah.
I
still
will
do
them
even
if
nobody
shows
up.
I
will
show
up
every
time.
A
I
think
it's
good
I
I
was
for
a
while.
I
was
like,
if
nobody's
coming.
Let's
not
do
them,
but
I
think
it's
nice
to
always
have
them
just
there.
It's
okay,
onboarding!
I
think
we're
starting
to
talk
through
this.
I
really
liked
what
you
were
doing
yesterday
when
you
reached
out
to
everybody
like
on
the
from
the
last
month
or
so
so
justin
we
had
had
a
bunch
of
people,
hey
kafiya.
C
A
Kind
of
joining
the
chaos
project
via
slack,
you
know
just
kind
of
saying,
hey
I'd
like
to
participate.
My
name
is,
is
so
and
so
and
yesterday
elizabeth
reached
back
out
to
everybody,
I
like,
I
think
we
should
probably
do
that
pretty
deliberately
every
now
and
then
just
to
make
sure
people
feel
welcome.
So
I
really
like
that.
B
Yeah
I
changed
the
form
a
little,
because
I
noticed
that
a
lot
of
people
say
they
want
to
join,
but
they're
not
really
ready
to
contribute.
So
if
I
send
them
even
if
I
would
send
them
a
task
like
okay,
here's
a
task
they'd
be
like
whoa.
I
don't.
I
don't
know
what
this
is
yet
you
know.
So
I
added
a
a
question
on
the
forum
that
basically
asks
like.
Where
are
you
in
your
journey
like
how
familiar
are
you
with
chaos
like
either
yeah?
You
know,
I
don't
know
them
at
all
or
whatever
and.
B
Next,
one
is,
if
they're
ready
to
participate,
so
that
will
help
me
guide
them.
A
B
Did
them
over
the
summer
last
year,
the
the
north
american
summer,
and
I.
E
B
Not
talked
to
sean
to
see
if
he
wants
to
do
another
round
of
those,
and
I
have
not
talked
to
venue
to
see
if
grimore
labs
interested
in
doing
something
similar.
But
we
can
certainly
put
that
on
the
on
the
list
sometime
to
discuss.
B
Yeah,
okay,
I
don't
know
if
I
would
have
to
check
with
sean
to
see
if
any
of
the
participants
actually
ended
up
becoming
regular
contributors.
But
I
think
it
was
really
helpful,
just
in
general
for
sean
to
kind
of
streamline
that
process
of
getting
someone
on
board
and
like
have
that
nail
down.
A
Okay,
right
on
cool
all
right
see
a
few
more
things
in
here.
Building
community
conversation
around
d.
I
think
we're
actually
having
good
success
in
this
regard,
so
we
are
making
changes
to
the
metrics
and
the
metrics
template
to
talk
about
how
a
particular
metric
in
a
working
group
that
isn't
the
dei
working
group
may
have
an
impact
on
dei
related
issues.
A
So
I
think
that's
a
really
great
thing.
Obviously,
translations
are
occurring
across
all
metrics
as
well.
So
I
think
we're
having
good
success
and
I
don't
know
about
you,
elizabeth
or
matt
or
just
nerdfight,
but
I
every
time
dei
comes
up,
no
matter
where
it
is
in
the
chaos
project.
It's
it's
met
with.
You
know
good
reception
generally,
so.
B
A
No,
I
agree,
and
just
because,
like
the
gremore
lab
team
is
obviously
located
in
madrid
but
like
we
that's
not
fair
to
just
say:
hey,
you
speak
spanish.
A
You
know
maybe
and
just
really
focus
on
the
chinese
translations,
and
if
there
is,
we
could
say
chinese
and
potentially
others
and
not
focus
on
spanish,
and
if
somebody
else
would
like
to
translate
the
metrics
into
whatever
it
might
be:
japanese,
portuguese,
india,
it
doesn't
matter
that
would
be
great
but
you're
right.
We
need
a
community
of
people
to
do
this.
A
So
justin
we
we
have
so
I
had
some
money.
We
used
some
some
dollars
earlier
to
do
some
early
spanish
translations.
A
The
problem
that
we
were
having
is
a
lot
of
the
metrics
are
kind
of
fluid,
so
they
get
changed
sometimes
so
they
just
get
updated
like
a
sentence
gets
updated
or
you
know,
a
lot
of
the
dei
line
gets
added
like
that
section
and
the
implementation.
It
was
getting
a
little
bit
burdensome
to
track
that
with
a
third
party
that
is
paid,
so
we
could
pay
if
there's
a
reasonable
process
to
get
that
done.
A
Yeah
shoya
in
the
chinese
community.
They
were
looking
at
starting
to
automate
some
of
the
process
into
chinese
and
then
it
would
be
like
a
review.
A
So
you'd
have
like
a
you'd,
have
an
automated
process
that
would
do
bulk
translation
and
then
you
would
have
an
individual
like
go
back
through
that
bulk
translation
and
just
be
like
yeah.
That's
a
terrible
sentence
or
something
like
that,
and
so,
if
that's
kind
of
what
you're
getting
at,
because
we
could
do
that.
C
Just
wanted
to
mention
here
that
I
just
got
an
email
like
during
the
chaos
call.
Yesterday,
the
outreachy
is
doing
a
call
for
outreaching
mentors,
that's
something
we
could
potentially
have
as
a
mentorship
program
again
talking
about
ai
tooling,
for
this
kind
of
thing,.
A
There
just
always
seems
to
be
a
need
of
at
least
working
with
our
friends
in
china,
like
a
group
of
people
that
is
more
than
a
single
person
who
are
really
interested
or
interested
in
and
dedicated
in
continuing
to
help
with
the
translations
over
time
and
as
they
evolve.
So
that's
what
we
need
to
do.
Yeah
justin.
E
Yeah
so
one
thing
I've
also
seen
in
other
communities,
especially
ones
that
start
to
have
that
wider
international
coverage
is
that
use
of
localizations
is
a
really
important
onboarding
opportunity
for
new
contributors,
especially
in
non-technical
areas.
E
Having
a
community-based
platform
is
important
for
contributions,
because
it
can
help
build
community
around
these
things,
but
it
does
come
with
an
added
weight
of
like
who's
going
to
review
those
things.
The
translations
in
fedora.
We
have
language
leads,
so
someone
will
be
like,
or
a
group
of
people
will
be
the
chinese
like
language
managers.
I
I
guess
I
don't
know
what
the
word
is
in
these
tools
or
or
spanish
managers,
and
those
are
the
people
who
have
permissions
to
go
through
and
review
translations.
E
But
anybody
can
join
the
spanish
group,
the
spanish
localization
group
and
start
localizing
strings
in
like
any
of
the
two
tools
I
just
dropped
in
the
chat.
E
That's
why
I
think
it
maybe
could
be
interesting
here
if
we're
wanting
to
make
still
make
it
easier
for,
like
an
outside
third
party,
to
do
translations,
while
also
still
allowing
this
community
participation
piece.
Maybe
we
can
look
at
things
like
web
late
being
the
open
source
version
that
fedora,
like
fedora
project,
uses
this
for
its
localization.
E
A
Yeah
well,
we
had
webley
now
that
you
bring
that
up
and
to
matt's
point
earlier
without
richie
we
had
a
student
tola
who
had
started
to
this
was
years
ago.
Even
it
started
to
explore
web
light
as
a
as
a
the
tool
for
doing
these
these
translations.
So
maybe
we
can
revisit
that
again
because
it
looked
very
promising
at
the
time.
C
A
Listening
to
you
talk
to
and
justin
and
elizabeth,
you
can
probably
kind
of
confirm
this.
I
do
feel
like
we're
actually
developing
localization.
In
china
I
mean
they
are
they're,
starting
to
run
local
chinese
meetups
they're.
Starting
to
do.
Chaos
casts
in
chinese
so
running
podcasts
with
within
the
chinese
community.
A
So
I
think
we're
we're
getting
some
some
really
great
traction
there
and
to
your
point
like
shoya
and
yahui
have
been
like,
as
leads
not
necessarily
language
leads,
but
like
localization
leads
and
translation
leads
have
been
completely
invaluable
when
it
comes
to
to
doing
localization
in
china,
I
mean
something
that
I
know
I
couldn't
do
and
just
something
I
couldn't
do
by
myself.
So
that's
cool.
E
So,
okay,
this
maybe
could
be
a
conversation,
at
least
on
the
infrastructure
side.
Maybe
this
is
something
we
look
at
the
the
ford
group.
A
This
is
good,
I
don't
have
an
answer
to
that,
but
yeah
something
I
think
we
could
talk
about
on
on
monday,
all
right
cool.
So
thank
you
always
good
ideas
that
are
coming
out
of
this.
This
meeting
also
came
developing
new
chaos
metrics.
These
are
kind
of
as
we
just
continue
on
in
2022.
A
I
think
some
of
these
are
lined
up
with
with
the
badging
program.
I
think
others
are
kind
of
wrapping
up
some
metrics
that
have
been
around
for
a
while.
C
A
It's
it's
coming
its
own
gotcha,
the
accessibility
audit.
This
is
something
that
we
had
started
to
do,
but
we
just
didn't
finish
really
so
this
is.
Do
you
remember
this
elizabeth?
We
had
actually
started
to
have
conversations
around.
A
B
A
And
we
have
the
funding
to
do
it.
So
that's
a
like
it's
not
a
financial
barrier.
Let's
see,
I'm
gonna
skip
the
next
one
inclusive
naming.
I
think
this
is
this
came
up
also
in
the
community
call
a
little
bit
more.
A
C
We
I
know
from
the
community
call
yesterday
that
we're
going
to
be
focusing
starting
on
the
metrics
for
the
inclusive
naming
we've
added.
B
C
The
list
of
kind
of
retrospective
view
on
metrics
and
also
the
we're
focusing
on
working
on
that
for
the
next
iteration
of
metrics
as
well.
Okay,
okay,
that's!
I
think.
That's
a
good
start!
Once
you
have
some
kind
of
process
on
this
on
this
inclusive
naming
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
easier
to
understand
how
to
do
it
for
the
rest
of
the
project.
Okay,
back
there
for
along
there.
B
Matt,
do
you
messy,
do
you
want,
or
are
you
a
part
of
the
inclusive
naming
initiative
group.
C
B
C
Honestly,
I
focus
mostly
on
the
stuff
that
they
produce,
like
the
the
team
list
of
yeah,
so
it'd
be
good
to
attend
a
couple
diminished
yeah.
B
A
All
right
good,
this
is
me-
and
I'm
already
I'm
talking
to
kevin
about
this
with
respect
to
simplifying
the
website.
There's
a
lot
going.
D
C
Before
we
get
started
on
the
next
items
in
the
in
the
list,
yeah,
we
maybe
deal
with
this
a
set
amount
of
like
this
is
just
for
my
brain
and
structure.
But
can
we
maybe
do
a
set
amount
of
like
goals
every
meeting
so
that
we're
not
just
going
through
a
list
of
goals?
All
meeting.
B
A
A
Run
every
meeting.
Okay
sounds
good,
like
this
all
right
onboarding.
I
think
we
talked
about
this
already
simplifying
the
newcomer
experience,
so
we're
very
conscious
of
this.
This
one's
a
little
bit
on
on
me.
A
So
I
have
a
meeting
with,
I
believe
somebody
from
the
acm,
the
association
for
computing
machinery,
which
is
an
immensely
large
organization
in
the
academic
computing
side,
justin
you're,
probably
familiar
with
acm,
and
so
just
about
how
badging
the
chaos
badging
program
could
work
for
the
events
that
they
have
so
they're,
not
necessarily
open
source
events,
but
just
asking
their
events
to
think
about
badging.
We
may
have
some
opportunity
also
with
ieee,
I
think,
and
how
just
because
they
run
so
many
events
and
and
badging
in
that
regard
too.
So
I
think
there
are.
B
C
We
so
we've
always
been
open
to
taking
the
badging
initiative
is
centered
around
open
source
event
kind
of
structure.
We
I've
always
been
open
to
taking
non-open
source
events.
It's
just
that
mostly
we've
been
attracting
open
sources,
because
that's
who
we
reach
out
to
so
we're
definitely
welcome
to
making
that,
like
those
accommodations.
C
Okay,
yeah,
we
we
I
mean
even
in
the
original
it
just
depends
on
case
the
case,
but
we
can
always
omit
like
we've
had
situations
where
people
have
a
an
in
person
or
a
hybrid
event,
and
they
submitted
as
an
in-person
event
and
the
family
friendliness
doesn't
necessarily
apply
things
like
that.
So
just
cut
that
kind
of
stuff
in
mind.
A
All
right
cool,
thank
you,
we've
kind
of
done
the
user
feedback
and
survey
and
then
just
one
that's
kind
of
on
my
mind.
A
A
A
I
just
want
to
kind
of
put
these
back
in
front
of
people
that
these
are
the
things
you
know
it's
similar
to
2021.
I
think,
there's
some
new
things
that
are
starting
to
emerge,
but
it
is.
It
is
a
lot
of
things
so
all
right
and
then
matt
to
your
point.
You
know
next
time.
I
think
we
can
start
kind
of
looking
at
these
in
smaller
pieces
and
taking
them
on
just
you
know
a
meeting
at
a
time.
So
I
think
that
was
your
point.
Wasn't
it
like
not
a
huge
list?
C
Yeah,
so
what
I
was
kind
of
what
I
have
in
mind,
definitely
isn't
the
only
idea
here,
but
is
to
go
like
kind
of
rotate
through
goals
like
this
is
the
goal
of
the
meeting
and
then,
as
we
move
through
these
goals.
C
A
A
Okay,
great
well,
everybody
it's
good
to
see
you
I'm
a
minute
over
so
matt
I'll,
see
you
in
nine
minutes
see
you
later
stop
at
the
top
of
the
hour.
Anybody
want
to
hear
my
goat
one
last
time.