►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.November.11.2019
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.November.11.2019
A
B
A
A
C
C
You
know
I
think
starting
to
build
a
new
question,
because
this
is
the
deeply
survey
just
the
first
attempts
right.
It's
the
annual
survey
that
happens
anyways,
so
we
just
left
a
couple
of
questions
there.
Now
we
actually
want
to
start
considering
you
know,
assuming
that
in
the
future
we
will
have
actually
a
sample.
That
is
that
that
can
help
us
understand
what
we
you
know.
What
we
hope
to
to
deliver
to
to
create
a
more
accessible
and
inclusive
opens
an
open-source
experience
Pindos.
C
D
B
Place
to
start
for
questions
who
would
be
under
the
focus
areas,
they
have
a
bunch
of
ways.
You
can
things
that
you
want
to
ask
of
your
organization,
I,
put
a
link
there
and
the
chat,
and
if
you
click
underneath
the
focus
areas,
it
has
the
questions
that
you
kind
of
want
to
ask
yourself,
and
you
can
build,
definitely
build
some
questions
off
of
that
for
a
survey
as
well.
Yeah.
B
D
B
You
this
is
the
beginning
of
a
program
that,
if
you
have
something
like
the
black
badging
or
C
at
CI,
a
best
practices,
it's
more
of
a
program
of
a
badging
race
on
pursuit
and
inclusion,
best
practices.
So
that's
it
we're
just
kind
of
starting
that
planning
that
in
the
ground
you
for
now,
but
I
wanted
to
get
that
out
there
that
that's
exists.
Now.
A
Do
you
have
any
so
first
of
all,
I'm
super
excited
that
this
is
coming
into
being
and
that
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
this
and
that
you're
leading
some
of
the
efforts
there.
So
that's
that's
really
exciting.
Yeah
I
know
matt
has
been
talking
about
this
idea
for
a
while
to
take
the
DNI
metrics
that
we
have
for
events
and
finding
a
way
to
actually
use
them
and
building
out
the
framework
for
events
to
self-certify
or
provide
evidence
that
they
have
these
requirements
fulfilled.
Absolutely,
when
is
the
project
going
to
kick
up.
B
B
D
E
C
C
F
C
A
The
so.
The
way
we
approach
this
typically
is
that
we
have
this
shared
Google
Doc,
so
that
we
can
edit
all
at
the
same
time
and
everyone
is
allowed
to
edit
and
what
we
strive
for
is
to
have
a
short
but
clear
description
of
what
this
metric
is
and
how
to
collect
the
data.
So
if
you
have
any
ideas,
please
add
them.
If
there's
something
that
is
not
clear
to
you,
please
flag
it
and
about
an
idea
for
how
to
make
it
better.
Okay,.
G
G
C
At
the
tail
end
of
last
meeting
that
was
thought
stone
remaining
in
this
talk
so
before
it
doing
a
work
session
on
another
dock,
we
would
like
to
you
know,
make
sure
that
we're
not
like
leaving
something
open-ended
and,
and
so
we're
wrapping
this,
and
then
you
know
hopefully
we'll
get
to
that.
But
I
mean
ours
anyways,
it's
not
is
not
a
little
brush
because
we're
talking
about
the
future
surveys
right
so
so
like
they.
Let's
use
this
as
this.
C
A
A
A
At
all,
so
chaos
as
a
whole
has
the
goal
to
define
metrics
and
ways
to
understand
the
health
of
communities
and
one
working
group.
The
one
that
you're
meeting
for
right
now
is
on
the
aspect
of
diversity
and
inclusion,
and
we
organized
our
our
metrics
in
focus
areas
and
the
came
out
research
done
by
Mozilla
two
years
ago
on
how
to
understand
diversity,
inclusion
and
open
source.
A
G
C
A
C
All
right,
yeah,
no
I
I
just
wanted
to
clarity,
so
we
would
know
if
it
falls
all
under
three
or
if
we're
you
know,
maybe
saturating
it.
You
just
put
in
under
three
so
but
yeah.
So
we
can
extend
together.
Like
depend
diversity.
You
know
as
a
new
direction
there
to
happy
vertical
component.
I
would
love
to
be
prefer.
The
fast
version.
Okay,.
A
It's
interesting
idea,
so
so
going
back
to
our
structure,
we
always
start
with
the
goal
and
our
goal
here,
let's
say
for
event:
diversity
is
to
identify
the
diversity
and
inclusion
at
events
and
when
we
go
into
the
goal
we
have
several
questions
like.
How
well
does
the
speaker
line
up
for
the
event
represent
a
diverse
set
of
demographics,
and
this
is
where
the
speaker
demographics
metric
comes
in.
A
We
have
the
question:
how
diverse
are
the
attendees,
and
that
is
the
one
we
were
just
working
on
with
identifying
the
diversity
of
attendees,
and
so
we
followed
the
gold
question
metric
approach
to
see
okay.
What
is
it
that
you
want
to
achieve?
What
questions
do
you
have
on
your
path
getting
there
and
what
metrics
can
help
you
to
understand
if
you're
on
track
or
where
you
need
to
put
in
more
effort
and
then
for
each
metric?
Let's
say:
attendees
demographic
as
the
metric.
A
We
have
a
template
like
we
have
here
in
the
Google
Doc
with
title.
We
restates
the
question
that
was
driving
us
towards
this
metric
and
we
don't
Boulder
there
actually,
but
that's
fine,
and
then
we
have
a
description
about.
Okay,
this
metric
is
and
then
we
have
objectives.
Why
do
we
look
at
the
metric?
What
can
you
do
with
it?
We
talked
about
the
implementation.
If
you
want
to
start
using
the
metric,
what
considerations
do
you
have
while
you
collect
the
metric?
How
do
you?
How
do
you
collect
data?
How
do
you
filter
it?
A
G
Now
I
understand
it,
the
structure,
I
just
don't
follow
the
how
we
are
gonna
use
the
the
demographics
at
Indy
in
the
process,
you
see
what
what
will
be
the
outcome
of
the
the
did.
They
act
Raj,
the
step
that
we
are
doing.
You
see
I'm
I'm.
Looking
for
the
S
word
of
I'm,
trying
to
bridge
the
Doge
gas
goes
with.
The
cares.
G
Community
goes
that's
this
and
try
to
make
a
bridge
between,
for
example,
I
just
received
the
best
received
a
message
from
from
Rachel
from
the
organization
and
and
she
believes
that
we
must
must
leave
it.
The
question
true
won't
westrom
only
because
she
believes
that
the
the
fuel
that
accessibility
of
the
be
a
priority,
no
matter
the
result
of
the
survey.
So
what
am
I
saying,
I'm
trying
to
filter
and
understand
what
are
they
go
for
the
huge
community
and
how
can
we
fit
the
and
bring
diversity
use?
G
The
all
y'all
know
how
experience
and
do
is
doing
this
properly.
You
know
not
doing
just
by
doing
and
I'm
not
we're
not
doing
great
and
survey
just
to
say:
hey,
hey,
we
have
a
survey.
No,
it's
not
the
point.
It's
wrecked
it's
to
actually
have
and
do
something
you
know
so.
I
just
won
understand
how
this,
how
this
provides
a
drawback
ground.
G
C
I
think
I
understand
the
gap,
though
so
some
of
the
questions
we
have
or
trying
to
put
on
the
sir
right
now
they
don't
tied
specifically
to
a
metric
you're
wondering
whether
or
not
we're
trying
to
tie
them
to
a
metric
based
on
the
work
we're
doing
here
so
think
of
them.
I
think
we
can
clarify
this
so
so
now
the
short
few
questions,
one
or
three
or
four
as
they
were,
those
are
a
done
deal.
Those
are
a
separate
thing
that
we
are
doing
outside
of
this
context.
C
In
this
context,
we
are
beginning
to
learn
how
the
framework
is
used
to
devise
metric
based
question
or
metric
geared
questions
because
remember
when
they
asked
us
what?
How
can
we
help
and
the
answer
was
I
can
tell
you
what
I
can
get.
You
know
to
get
my
life
easier,
but
that's
not
the
answer
that
I
would
like
to
give
the
answer
that
we
would
like
to
give
is:
how
can
we
really
help?
How
can
how
can
people
who
are
struggling
and
unable
to
express
that
they
are?
C
H
G
And
what
we
actually
do,
first
of
all,
I
think
the
first
of
all
of
the
communities
to
understand
how
we
are
today
what
we
are
facing.
We
we
don't
have
any
that
we
have
personal
experience,
but
you
don't
have
any
for
info
here
that
are
high
level,
that
that
says.
Okay,
we
have
this
percentage
of
people,
they
struggles
with
communication,
these
other
people
they
struggle
with
I,
don't
know
visual
accessibility
and
all
we
don't
I
believe
this
is
the
first,
the
first
goal
we
don't
have.
G
The
second
is
true:
it's
it's
starts
the
discussion
that
what
can
be
done
to
help
and
then
as
a
community.
We
can't
do
our
demands,
nothing
it's
about
suggestion,
but
they
collect
the
the
good,
the
good
collect
of
the
data
the
survey
doing
properly.
It
provides
a
background
for
the
argumentation,
for
example,
as
a
simple
example:
people's
blind,
a
color
blindness.
G
We
do
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
people
with
color
blindness
and
the
simple
suggest
is
contrast:
button,
just
changing
the
contrast
on
the
side
it
is,
and
but
this
not
only
about
the
color
brightness,
it's
about
the
demarks
accessibility.
We
could
could
get
that
and
my
primary
concern
is
his
personal
concern,
is
by
ignorance,
doing
something
and
neglecting
or
how
can
I
say,
forget
a
group
of
people
they
understand
and
then
I'd
I
forgot.
D
G
C
A
So
the
the
goal
and
the
concern
that
you
have
especially
the
first
one,
just
figuring
out,
what's
the
baseline,
where
I'll
be
today,
that
is
something
that
you
want
to
figure
out,
but
it's
the
same
thing
that
other
communities
want
to
figure
out
as
well,
and
so
this
is
what
chaos
the
goal
of
the
chaos
project
is
to
get
together,
have
a
place
where
you
can
ask
these
questions.
How
do
we
go
about
doing
this?
How
do
we
find
out
what
the
baseline
is?
What
kind
of
survey
questions
can
be
asked?
A
What
kind
of
interviews
can
we
do?
Where
do
we
get
the
information
and
how
do
we
do
it
in
an
in
an
effective
way,
and
so
this
is
what
chaos
is
about.
Building
out
this
best
practices
and
the
knowledge
base
for
doing
this
work,
and
that
is
our
goal
to
collect
these
ways
for
answering
your
questions
and
so
the
work
that
we
were
just
looking
at
the
Google
Doc.
A
That
is
just
one
very
small
part
when
we
look
at
events
that
we
want
to
understand
the
event
diversity,
and
now
we
are
in
deep
in
the
weeds,
describing
how
do
you
actually
go
about
collecting
the
data
and
doing
getting
the
answers
that
you
need?
So
does
that
clarify
this
connection
between
what
your
goals
are
and
how
you
can
leverage
the
chaos
project
for
building
out
the
work
that
you're
doing
and
building
on
the
knowledge
that
you're
collecting
here
across
many
different
projects.
A
So
going
back
to
the
metric
attendees
demographic,
you
can
see
this
as
a
training
ground.
If
you
want
for
the
discussion,
we
want
to
have
next
about
the
metrics
that
you
care
about
more
so
I'll
share.
My
screen.
You're
welcome
to
work
on
your
own
screen
on
the
metric,
but
I
can
also
drive
the
conversation
just
to
show
you
a
little
bit
how
the
chaos
project
works
with
metrics.
A
So
we
always
start
with
a
question.
How
diverse
are
the
attendees
and
we
have
a
description
in
this
case,
we
agreed
on
attendee
demographics,
help
indicate
the
potential
for
different
viewpoints
and
broader
perspectives
at
an
event
the
objectives
might
want
to
do.
This
is
to
determine
if
attendees
are
from
diverse
backgrounds.
We
want
to
determine
if
the
diversity
is
shared
across
different
events,
basis
like
sessions
and
tracks
and
help
retain
attendees
from
diverse
backgrounds
for
future
events,
and
then
how
do
we
actually
go
about
understanding,
attendees,
demographics?
There
are
different
ways.
A
We
can
collect
data,
one
is
to
analyze
registration
data
for
attendee,
demographics,
and
so
here
is
where
we
would
to
do
demographic
questions
for
orchestration
reforms.
So
that's
something
they
can
provide
here,
but
a
lot
of
demographic
questions
already
asked
by
reps
raishin
bladders
like
what
we're
using
event
Brita,
they
already
have
predefined
demographic
questions.
F
C
Sorry,
the
announcement
is
about
a
bit
so
I
said
I
said:
I
wouldn't
complain,
but
I
guess
you
know,
I
got
just
got
throw
though
so
I
have
one
question:
I
feel
that
you
jump
from
how
can
it
be
improved
to
to
a
question
that
seems
to
be
two
questions
in
one?
Whether
or
not
the
person
feels
it
met
or
did
not
need
their
expectations?
Is
it
something
you
can
infer
from
the
examples,
but
is
not
concrete,
so
maybe
you
want
to
first
ask
them:
did
it
meet
your
expectations?
C
You
know
I
ranked
and
then
you
would
then
ask
them.
Okay,
what
are
the
examples
for
to
just
you
know
towards
your
ranking?
You
said
you
found
that
neutral,
give
a
positive
and
a
negative.
You
said
you
found
a
positive,
give
a
positive,
maybe
a
negative,
but
you
know
so
so
so
splitting
those
into
two
questions
one
is
quantitative,
just
ranked
and
the
other
is
qualitative
and
that
would
be
open-ended
I
believe.
So
it's
an
interview,
question
for
sure.
B
G
I
have
a
question
about
the
some
words,
for
example
the.
When
we
talk
about
diversity
and
inclusion
it
for
each
one,
it
has
a
different
meaning.
You
know,
for
the
LGBT
community
has
no
meaning
for,
for
example,
for
my
wife
she's
a
how
can
I
say:
I,
don't
know
English,
but
people
that
talk
by
hands.
I,
don't
know
the
so
it's
it
represents
another.
When
we
when
I,
saw
a
question
well,
how
well
did
David
meet
our
diversity
and
inclusion
expectation.
Should
we
have
other
different
like
bullet
points?
G
F
A
G
Then
the
event
brings
me
the
question:
if
we
built
the
we
on
the
questions
that
were
suggesting,
we
are
asking
for
the
the
diversity,
the
the
person
that
is
attending
the
the
question
answer
the
that
does
that
person
has
this.
How
can
I
say
these
categories
and
their
mind?
Just
you
see
that's
my
aura.
We
should
bring
them
in
the
briga
context.
I,
don't
know
I.
G
Because,
because
I,
my
concern
is
how
how,
however
I
can
consider
the
the
answer
to
be
true
or
false?
How
of
how
close
should
the
the
real
situation
we
are
going
to
have?
If,
if
you
have
three
distinct
groups,
answering
the
same
question
and
for
them,
they
all
could
say
true,
but
it
represents
different
meaning
for
each
of
them.
That
may
concern.
C
One
idea
that
comes
to
mind
is
leading
definition
style,
so
you
say
you
know
before
you
ask
about
a
particular,
sometimes
subjective
or
or
or
currently
in
upgrades.
You
know,
terminology
that
is
evolving.
I
think
is
a
good
word
before
you
ask
a
question
using
the
term
that
is
likely
having
more
than
one
variant.
You
actually
say,
given
that
the
definition
of
type
you
know
diversity
and
inclusion
being
so
answered
the
following
questions
right.
C
C
B
I've
also
got
an
idea
for
questions
like
this
as
well.
Kind
of
the
opposite
direction
would
be,
to
add,
add
some
ambiguity
or
some
like
without
subjectivity.
So
like
saying
something
like
how
welcoming
was
the
event
to
you
today,
and
that
would
be
easier
to
understand
from
both
the
analysis
perspective
and
the
in
the
perspective
of
someone
who
it
does
not
know
a
lot
about
this
for,
wants
to
contribute,
see
the
survey,
that's
kind
of
the
opposite
of
the
leading
definition,
but
I
think
most
of
them
would
work.
G
It
is
it
okay
to
link
their
answers
to
the,
for
example.
How
well
did
the
event
meteor
diversity
right?
It's
ER
diversity.
So
if
we
have
information
saying
what
kind
of
the
diversity
the
person
is
include,
the
person
that
is
in
Surrey
is
included
should
light
up
on
the
the
kind
of
the
if
he
has
or
no
included,
if
we
consider
only
their
the
the
category
a
sort
of
speaking
I'm.
Sorry.
A
So
let
me
let
me
try
to
put
this
into
the
fort
and
see
if
this
resonates
with
you.
One
of
the
ways
that
we
look
at
the
data
is
through
filters,
so
implementation,
section,
I
added
a
filters
section
where
we
can
group
all
of
the
responses
by
the
demographics
so
that
we
can
see
for
each
demographic
as
they
self-identified
in.
Let's
say
the
survey
how
they
responded
that
way.
A
A
C
C
It's
called
the
stipulative
terminology
section,
that's
usually
when
you're
writing
a
like
a
document,
and
you
have
a
definition
that
is
a
little
bit
watery
and
you
want
to
make
sure
readers
are
taking
your
version
of
the
definition.
So
you
say
it's
a
stipulative
term
for
you
know,
so
you
leave
with
that
and
then
everybody's
on
the
same
page.
C
G
C
In
books,
you
find
a
lot
of
like
more
commonly
find
acronyms
write
a
section
for
acronyms,
so
right,
it's
in
the
similar
part
in
a
book
where
you
would
say
and
stipulative
terms,
and
then
you
would
say
you
know
here
the
word
good.
It
means
you
know
anything
that
is
not
bad.
You
know
that's
one
bad
example.
Obviously,.
C
C
A
I,
don't
want
to
lose
these
insights
because
so
I
don't
want
way.
I!
Think
about
this.
Is
it's
not
specific
to
this
metric
attendees
demographic?
Your
thought
is
really
about
survey
best
practices,
so
I
think
they
need
to
have
a
section
somewhere
talking
about
survey
best
practices
yeah
so
but
I
captured
it
here.
So
at
some
point
we
can
transfer
it
over
to
his
practice.
Section.
A
A
E
C
F
A
A
C
C
It
does
relate
to
this,
so,
if
you
don't
mind,
can
we
share
was
previously
tell
me
what
I
was
doing
to
try
to
stay
in
the
same?
Yes
might
be
distracted
writing
code.
That
does
a
completely
different
thing
unrelated.
So
so
I'm
gonna
share
this
and
move
this
out
of
the
way.
So
while
we
were
working,
I
was
thinking.
C
It
takes
a
few
links
for
someone
to
go
to
the
dock
and
I
understand
that
this
I
cannot
just
be
due
to
not
having
the
links
here,
but
rather
you
want
people
to
go
and
read
things
before
they
can
access
the
dog,
so
I
thought
I
would
just
fork
and
propose
this
idea.
I,
you
know
we're
editing
this
dock
and
the
link
obviously
relates
to
the
first
focus
area.
C
D
A
C
Yeah
yeah,
so
so
we
could
do
that
on
the
on
the
respective
page.
Do
we
want
to
do
a
high-level
link
here
instead
of
saying
Draft,
we
would
say
that
they
need
to
eat
them
in
graphics,
but
that
will
that
column
will
become
boggle,
which
I
anticipated
kind
of
the
other
suggestion,
though,
because
you
know
I
always
try
to
have
like
two
things
up.
C
My
sleeve
or
more
I
understand
that
people
like
markdown
for
many
of
its
concise
features,
but
if,
if
you
have
a
table
and
your
line
is
more
than
80
characters
or
soft
wrapping,
then
you're
you're
already
losing
the
benefit
of
using
markdown
table
notation.
What
people
often
forget
is
that
HTML
has
convenient
syntax.
Where
inside
a
table,
you
don't
need
to
close
a
row.
You
don't
need
to
close
a
cell
and
that
spaces
out
the
text.
C
C
C
C
D
D
G
G
B
G
B
C
So
so
I
think
this
is
said.
This
is
kind
of
short
notice.
It's
will
definitely,
you
know,
try
to
schedule
a
more
you
know,
a
larger
mailing
list,
meeting
I
think
this.
Is
this
a
3d
on
on
just
as
the
new
executive
director
and
has
a
new
initiative.
You
just
won't.
Have
the
you
know
opportunity
to
just
I
guess:
introduce
the
initiative
or
something
yeah?
Are
they
so
so
I'm
gonna
open
the
PR
I'm
gonna,
be
here?
Okay,
my
boss
is
asking
me,
but.
C
Alright
yeah,
hopefully
we
didn't
lose
another
insight,
but
yeah.
So
so
please
join
us
in
today's
meeting.
I
mean
this
is
all
happening,
I
think
because
of
joining
the
meeting
last
week
you
know
things
are
art
being
positive
on
our
end
and
I
really
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
ended
up.
You
know
connecting
is
just
having
you
know,
effects
everywhere
now
for
the
work
which
I
hope
we
will
settle
down
and
figure
out
how
to
or
head
straight
and
do
actual
busy
work.
C
C
A
C
B
B
C
Yeah,
so
so
yeah
so
I,
we
would
love
for
you
guys
to
join
I
I,
guess
you
know
one
or
two
people
that
would
be
fair,
but
I
I
don't
even
know
what
link
we
should
use
to
join
that
meeting.
That
is
technically
two
hours
from
now,
not
wrong.
Central
time
is
one
hour
away
from
Eastern
Time,
that
is
it
one
or
two
hours
away
from
1:00
p.m.
your
central
is
in
one
hour
in
one
hour:
okay,
good,
because
I
would
have
came
as
we're
done
right.
C
So
so
it's
wonderful
and
it's
definitely
something
that
came
up
over
the
weekend
and
Sawa
Sawa
and
Rachel
have
been
connecting
about
it.
So
so
will
there,
as
for
both
gearing
towards
metrics
for
future
work
in
the
nodejs
initiative
and-
and
he
completely
cannibalized
your
meeting
so
sorry
about
that
we
are
on
a
journey
and
we're
just
starting
so
I
guess
we
don't
need
to
worry
about
it
at
this
point
you
know
we
don't
have
much
time
the
fact
that
you're
traveling
you
know.