►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.November.18.2019
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.November.18.2019
B
A
A
A
A
C
B
B
You
have
to
prove
that
you
have
test
Suites
and
then
they're
their
test,
Suites
that
actually
work.
You
have
to
prove
that
you
have
install
files.
Things
like
that.
You
know
it's
a
certain
set
of
criteria
that
have
to
be
essentially
proven
and
if
you
can
promote
a
review,
peer
review,
really
yep,
and
so,
if
you
can
do
that,
then
you
get
published
in
the
journal
source
software,
and
all
of
this
occurs
on
github
out
in
the
open.
D
B
A
E
F
F
A
B
F
Have
it,
and
no
no,
this
setup
like
that,
so
we
livestream
the
meetings
by
default
like
we
obviously
take
a
minute
or
two
to
coordinate,
and
then
you
say
we're
going
to
go,
live
and
then
it's
like
stream
right,
I'll,
take
a
look
at
doing
that.
Yeah
yeah,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
you
know,
come
up
with
a
really
good
announcement
introduction
in
the
beginning.
You
know
I
have
a
thematic
entrance
for
every
episode
and
you
know
it
sounds.
It
sounds
like
a
ton
of
work.
These
don't
start
like
hey
there.
Yeah
we're
here
is.
A
F
A
C
F
You,
but
just
back
to
the
earth
instead
of
the
sorry
just
before
you
move
a
survey
to
gather
an
epidemic
graphics
is
that
described
like?
Is
there
a
bar
on
what
counts
as
a
survey
to
gather
at
the
demographics,
because,
like
I
I
wasn't
I
was
studying
in
the
US
and
I
had
like
I
struggled
a
little
bit
to
fill
the
census
when
I
had
to
you
know
cuz
when
I
first
had
to
identify
okay?
What
do
they
mean
by
each
of
these?
F
E
F
F
F
I
still
have
not
figured
out
how
it's
being
circulated,
but
why
I'm
sure
somebody
said
the
answer
somewhere,
but
I
always
keep
wondering
you
know.
Would
it
actually
be
accessible
when
it's
links
circulated
or
good,
because
that
would
you
know
skew
the
data
right
so
anyways,
let's
get
back
to
this?
Is
this
capture
it
for
you?
Sallah
I
mean
because
there's
a
point
where
okay,
yet
like
any
any
point
of
reference,
it's
like
you're,
obviously
doing
it
wrong.
You
could
do
it
better,
but
not
not
any
less
than
or
else
it's
wrong.
F
It
definitely
because
it
kind
of
cuts
a
you
know,
an
expectation
to
try
to
meet.
Obviously
people
are
up
to
you
know
they
can
choose
whatever
they
want
there,
but
as
long
as
you
know,
two
people
in
your
room,
one
of
them
at
least
this
honest-
would
say
no
we're
doing
it
wrong
and
then
you're
good
right.
So.
A
C
F
A
F
F
B
F
F
B
F
I
mean
in
certain
questions
you
actually
should
always
give
a
little
ground.
Oh
you
should
say
you
know.
This
question
needs
to
be
an
odd
number
or
even
number,
there's
a
criteria
for
the
validity
of
the
statistical
data.
You
get
yep
that
people
can
or
cannot
choose
the
middle
ground,
because
people
often
choose
the
middle
ground
that
they
can't
use
anything
else
not
because
they,
you
know,
fall
in
the
middle
yep.
A
B
F
F
Tried
to
pick
one
that
doesn't
like
like
a
chosen
expression,
but
it
not
have
any
any
in
like
associated.
So
you
know
inferences
like
you
know,
because,
because
now
with
emojis,
you
know
you
could
definitely
find
all
these
faces
that
have
other
associated
attributes,
various
yeah.
So
like
the
teardrop
or
the
drop
of
sweat
like
whatever
it
is,
you
know
kind
of
changes,
the
meaning
of
a
smile
of
it
right.
F
F
B
F
F
B
A
B
A
F
B
A
F
B
Still
there
yet
twenty
demographics
is
in
a
pull
request
now
onwards
and
again,
the
hope
is.
Is
that
part
of
working
on
these
metrics
is
that
if
we
put
push
forward
a
DNI
badging
program
that
we
have
a
set
of
metrics
by
which
people
could
receive
a
badge?
So
that
was
kind
of
why
it
from
an
event
perspective
which
is
kind
of
why
these
rows
to
the
top
yeah.
F
It's
a
little
funny,
but
so
just
one
thing
about
have
marked
down
from
Google
Docs
Google
Docs
can
export
text
files
and
they
actually
treat
bullet
points
as
that
they
are
marked
down
lists
not
marked
down,
but
at
least
I
like
bullet
lists.
For
that
the
one
thing
I
found
was
not
convenient,
those
that
they
leave
from
footers
or
footnotes.
They
have
a
slide
to
document.
When
you
have
a
comment
and
then
an
annotation
in
the
doc,
they
put
a
letter
in
a
square
bracket
and
then
at
the
end
of
the
dock.
F
A
F
F
B
B
C
C
C
E
D
F
B
A
B
A
A
So
the
way
I
see
chaos
and
these
metrics
is
that
we
provide
one
question
at
the
top,
but
sometimes
people
have
other
questions
and
so
to
be
able
to
still
use
chaos
for
building
out
their
own
metric
strategy.
We
need
to
provide
ideas
about
the
metric
that
go
beyond
just
that.
One
question:
okay,
that's
my
personal
view
of
what
we're
doing
so.
Could.
B
B
B
Surveyed
speakers
and
attendees
to
learn
to
what
extent
the
event
met
their
dni
expectations.
How
will
the
speaker
line-up
meet
your
diversity,
inclusion
expectations
in
light
of
your
diversity,
inclusion
experience?
How
likely
are
you
to
recommend
this
event
to
other
speakers,
I
think
again,
I
think
we
can
get
rid
of
that.
A
B
Yeah
I
think
that's
kind
of
important,
because
that
had
come
up
a
few
times
in
the
conversation
such
that
in
an
event
that,
like
it's,
not
just
the
keynotes
that
have
good
representation
or
one
particular
workshop
yeah,
it's
one
particular
that
has
good
representation
where,
where
the
90%
of
the
rest
of
the
kind
of
fish
does
not
I,
think
that's
the
point
there
isn't
it.
Yes,.
A
D
B
A
B
B
C
A
A
B
A
A
B
F
C
F
F
B
F
B
F
B
B
F
A
One
thing
I
saw
at
github
universe
this
week
or
last
week
was
they
had
people
who
translated
to
sign
language
but,
and
they
also
had
the
screens
on
the
site
where
you
could
see
what
was
said
on
stage.
Was
this
just
for
keynotes?
It
was
for
all
sessions.
Really,
yes,
Wow,
so
I
don't
know
if
they
have
an
amazing
AI.
That
translates
everything
that
was
said
to
text.
But
it
was
pretty
good
because
it
knew
all
the
technical
jargon.
That's
crazy,.
B
F
Yeah
I
know
like
it's
a
feature
now,
it's
quite
you
know
they
could
actually
have
a
caption.
Your
call
and
and
I
mean
once
you
caption
a
call.
You
could
translate
a
call
because,
like
Google
Translate
is
already
there
and
it's
you
know
been
been
refined
by
a
lot
of
mistakes
over
the
years,
but
I
think
this
type,
the
amount
errors
captured
are
high.
You
know
big
anyways.