►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.WeeklyHangout.Jan.7.2019
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.WeeklyHangout.Jan.7.2019
B
A
B
B
C
So
it
looks
like
I
started
from
the
bottom
up,
so
I
I
started
to
drive,
cm
the
proposal
for
OS
OS
and
one
of
the
things
that
one
of
the
questions
that
I
came
across
as
I
started
to
draft.
This
was
I
know
that
we've
been
spending
a
lot
of
time
on
the
objectives
for
2019
and
what
we
really
want
to
dive
into
there.
How
much
of
the
session
at
OS
OS
do
we
want
to
send?
C
C
As
I
was,
writing
me
the
abstract
I
thought
did
we
do
we
want
to
have
it
be
more
where
we
talk
about
what
the
objectives
are,
that
we've
been
working
on
or
do
we
want
to
do?
We
want
it
to
be
more
interactive
with
the
audience
and
have
them
input
into
it,
and
go
and
I'm
heading
to
the
point
of
at
the
end,
I
then
say
get
involved
and
participate
in
this
workgroup
and
I'm
thinking.
C
C
What
I
wanted
to
ask
with
ask
you
guys
in
this
or
folks
in
this
meeting
about
that
I
mean
I'm,
and
especially
with
that
saying
she
doesn't
have
to
be
very
long.
You
know
I'm,
basically,
you
know
ready
to
wrap
it
up.
I
just
want
your
input
into
what
we
want
this
to
be
in
then
on
this
I.
Just
basically
finish
it
up
and
hit
hit
Send
on
here.
Here's
the
link
to
to
have
you
input
on
the
public,
abstract.
A
B
C
C
B
A
B
I
think
that
would
be
good
and
I
think
the
abstract
we
can
be
at
this
point.
We
can
be
fairly
fairly
generic
about
it
right
we
can
talk
about.
You
know
how
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
you
know
what
we've
done
within
the
diversity
and
inclusion,
working
group
and
diversity,
metrics
and
get
audience
feedback
or
something
America
can
be
pretty
pretty
simple
about
it.
I
think.
D
B
D
That
so
as
the
risk,
you
know
the
risk
group
they're
gonna
be
submitting,
as
this
is
kind
of
getting
started
in
2018
they're
gonna
be
submitting
up
birds
of
a
feather
session,
which
is
really
just
about
kind
of
capacity
building,
and
then
growth,
maturity
and
decline.
I'm
pretty
sure
they're
gonna
be
submitting
a
presentation,
because
at
that
point
they
should
have
some
prototyping
done
their
focus
areas
and
they
just
like
to
kind
of
demonstrate
that
it's.
C
B
B
B
D
C
Cool
well
I
know
how
to
finish
that
said,
so,
when
I
will
I
think
it
depends
on
this
quickly
after
this
meeting
with
the
other
two
we'll
wait,
a
minute
wait,
a
minute
I
clicked
away
from
this
okay.
Here
we
go
I'm
with
the
other
two
I
plan
to
reach
out
to
them
this
morning.
So
that's
going
to
be
my
second
one
that
I
work
on
and
then
quickly
after
that,
the
the
third
one,
the
expanding
via
the
contributing
guide.
C
A
B
B
A
A
This
was
looking
at
the
metrics
that
are
currently
living
in
the
metrics
repository
to
see
if
we
need
to
incorporate
them,
and
what
I
remember
from
our
conversations
in
the
past
is
that
we
decided
to
not
merge
anything
back
right
now
and
the
metrics
repository
is
not
going
away.
So
we're
not
losing
anything,
and
so
I
would
actually
like
to
take
this
off
and
just
say
we're
done
with
this.
Okay.
A
B
A
B
A
A
I'm,
not
I,
don't
know
what
to
do
about
this.
It's
a
one
line
change
to
keep
track
of
where
people
are
employed
as
part
of
their
demographic
information,
I
think
itself's.
They
sure
that
we
currently
don't
have
this
metric
represented
and
that
people
care
about
it,
but
I
also
understand
that
there
are
that
organizational
affiliation
is
not
really
a
minority
issue.
I.
B
A
The
way
that
I
see
it
is,
we
have
those
percentage
metrics
when
we
talk
about
speaker,
demographics
or
community
demographics,
we
have
those
percentages
and
what
presenters
to
build
and
that's
just
a
matter
of
what
to
be
put
as
the
groups
that
we
are
looking
at
and
we
can
look
at
diverse,
not
diverse
in
whatever
way,
and
one
of
them
is
affiliation.
So
that's
why
I
see
this
as
a
matrix
and.
B
A
C
C
C
B
B
It's
silly,
it
should
be
what
this
mink,
that
we're
we're
missing
something
in
chaos
and
the
way
the
two
work
groups
are
defined
because
we
have.
We
have
diversity,
inclusion
and
we
have
growth,
maturity
and
decline,
and
we
don't
have
anyone
focused
on
the
critical
like
overall
project,
Health
metrics,
and
so
that's
why
I
like
the
way
Nicole
sort
of
articulated
that,
because
I
think
I
really
think
we
sort
of
have
a
have
a
gap
in
the
project
because
things
there's
there's
this
whole
set
of
things
that
are
in
the
metrics
repository
right
now.
C
Yeah
and
I
I
want
to
echo
what
you
said
about
it
being
extremely
important.
It's
really
critical
to
the
health
of
the
project.
Yeah
I,
don't
know
where
it,
but
it's
I
feel
like
the
closest
thing
would
be.
It
feels
like
isn't
that,
where
how
you
know
a
project
is
not
what
one
indicator
that
a
project
really
maybe
isn't
healthy
if
it's
important
for
just
one
company
and
that
that's
that's,
why
I
thought?
Well,
maybe
that
is
part
of
life
decline,
which
is
what
made
me
think.
Well,
maybe
that
is
growth,
maturity
decline,
but
if.
B
D
The
that
there's
a
gap
right
I
wish
I
wish
I
just
make
wave
a
magic
wand
and
all
of
those
metrics
in
that
huge
metrics
list
were
deployed
and
had
a
hole.
That
would
be
super
awesome.
So,
but
obviously
that's
not
gonna
happen,
so
I
guess.
The
question
is
what
I
hear
is
that
this
organizational
diversity
is
of
the
utmost
importance,
but
it
doesn't
seem
to
have
a
perfect
home,
for
it
is
that
kind
of
right.
D
All
the
metrics
in
that
list
that
have
that
huge
that
huge.
Let
me
turn
on
my
video
here
that
huge
metric
list
that
we
have
like
I,
wish
that
everything
in
there
could
be
captured
in
some
way
like
right
now.
You
know
what
I
mean,
but
that
list
far
outstrips
the
capacity
of
the
workgroups
right
now.
So
the
list
has
maybe
a
hundred
different
metrics
in
it.
Yeah
yeah
and.
D
The
the
the
gaps
just
come
from
the
workgroups,
whack
and
I-
don't
mean
this
as
an
act,
but
the
the
limited
capacity
of
the
workgroups
to
be
able
to
address
each
one
of
those
metrics.
So
maybe
to
the
point
of
kind
of
what
I'm
listening
to
you
say.
Don
is
that
trying
to
identify?
There
appear
to
be
some
in
that
metrics
list
that
are
truly
of
critical
importance.
C
D
B
I
sort
of
I
mean
I,
think
I
mentioned
this
before
and
kind
of
the
weekly
meeting,
but
I
and
I
think
people
got
caught
up
in
and
what
I
called
it.
I
was
talking
about
kind
of
like
core
metrics,
but
I
think
people
got
caught
up
in
that.
But
what
I
wonder
is
if,
if
we
do
need
sort
of
a
third
working
group
focused
on
some
of
these
important
metrics
that
come
across
all
of
the
the
other,
the
other
working
groups
so.
A
B
D
B
That
we
would
need
to
recruit
who
would
need
to
recruit
some
more
people,
but
you
know
I
know
there
are
some
people
like
like
Kate?
It
was
kind
of
she
was
sort
of
waiting
for
like
the
risk
and
value
to
get
spun
up,
because
that's
what
she
was
interested
in
so
I'm
wondering
if
spending
up
kind
of
a
you
know,
I,
don't
know
you.
Another
group
to
look
at
some
of
this
stuff
would
be
would
be
useful
and
whether
or
not
we
could
get
some
other
people
involved
can.
D
D
D
B
Right
word
got
hung
up
on
the
word
core
and
then
we
never
actually
got
to
the
they
didn't
understand.
The
discussion
I
was
trying
to
have
I
think,
but
it's
just
like
this
there's
a
sort
of
common
metrics
I,
don't
know
what
you
would
call
them,
but
there's
a
set
of
metrics
that
sort
of
span
span
across
working
groups
that
are
really
important,
but
the
aren't
growth,
maturity
and
decline
and
aren't
diversity
and
inclusion,
because.
C
D
C
D
B
D
C
D
A
D
B
D
B
B
A
B
A
A
B
Because
it's
hard
to
it's,
it's
one
of
those
metrics,
that's
super
hard
to
interpret
because
from
a
from
an
inclusion
standpoint
having
a
lot
of
unpaid
contributors
does
not
necessarily
mean
that
your
your
project
is
inclusive
to
people
who
are
coming
from
underrepresented
populations,
because
it
tends
to
be
people
who
have
the
money
and
the
free
time
to
do
this.
Work
on
their
own
tend
to
be
more
of
this,
but
I
think
it
gets
interpreted,
sort
of
the
other,
the
other
way,
which
is
that
it's
good,
because
anybody
can
contribute.
B
C
A
B
That's
not
to
mean
that
we
couldn't
add
it,
but
maybe
we
add
it
with
some
caveats
about
how
it's
it
difficult
to
interpret
metric
I,
mean
I,
think
I.
Think
it's
right,
so
I
would
be
inclined
to
go
ahead
and
add
it,
but
maybe
with
some
additional
narrative
around
how
it's
easily
misinterpreted
and
how
it
doesn't
always
mean
people
from
underrepresented
populations
are
are
coming
in
as
unpaid
volunteer
contributors
and
realistically
we
should
be
paying.
B
A
The
open
source
summit
in
Edinburgh
I
was
talking
to
Chris
from
scenes
here,
and
he
told
me
that
as
a
foundation,
they
do
look
at
diversity
inclusion,
but
they
have
no
influence
over
it,
because
that
is
something
companies
do
so
well.
The
foundation
can
say:
hey
all
of
your
employees.
Working
on
this
seem
to
be
very
similar,
not
so
diverse.
It
would
be
up
to
the
companies
to
do
something
about
it.