►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Evolution.Feb.26.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Evolution.Feb.26.2020
B
So
I
figured
today
there's
not
any
new
poll
requests
or
issues
to
talk
about
so
I
figured.
We
could
just
work
on
some
metrics
a
little
bit
see
how
far
we
get
I
know
Gary
you
might
have
to
tip
out
early,
but
before
that
I
mean
to
ask,
were
you
under
the
general
call
yesterday,
or
did
they
discuss
the
move
to
get
loud
and
stuff?
Is
there
anything
we
need
to
discuss
with
that
here?
So.
A
A
B
B
Okay
sounds
good
I
just
wanted
to
check
in
with
that,
make
sure,
there's
anything
we
needed
to
discuss
in
the
working
groups
or
anything
since
it
would
affect
us
too.
But
here
I
will
yeah
yeah
your
any
of
the
nets.
You
see
yeah.
So
last
week
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
Ruby
sheet
we
pulled
up
and
I
think
we
decided.
We
were
gonna
focus
on
some
new
contributor
metrics.
B
Since
those
we
only
had
the
last
release,
those
new
contributors
closing
issues
and
it
felt
like
it
just
made
sense
to
maybe
backfill
some
of
the
ones
for
commits
sorry.
We
had
new
for
closing
issues
and
then
back
filling
the
ones
for
new
contributors.
Overall,
new
contributors
of
commits
and
new
contributors
of
issues,
which
I
assume
just
means
new
open
issues
and
I.
Think
one
thing
that
we
also
discussed
was
linking
the
contributors
metric,
the
new
controllers
metric
to
the
common,
the
common
working
group.
B
Yeah,
okay,
so
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
looking
for
the
specific
line,
so
I
don't
think
we
decided
on
any
sort
of
language
specifically
to
use.
At
this
point
we
did
just
say
specifically
reference
the
specific
implementation,
or
that
that
this
is
a
specific
implementation
of
the
Commons
working
groups,
contributors
metric,
which
I
think
we
also
did
with
the
new
contributors
closing
issues
before
you
released
it.
If
I'm
correct.
B
B
A
C
B
B
B
Now
that
I
think
about
it,
because
to
me
the
to
me,
a
parameter
is
like:
if
I
change,
the
parameter,
it
fundamentally
changes
the
data
that
I
get
back
like
a
different
contributor
or
a
different
project
would
be
like
a
parameter
versus
a
filter.
Just
it's
the
same
data,
no
matter
what
I'm
just
choosing
to
look
at
it
a
little
bit
differently,
which
is
kind
of
but
the
period
of
time
says
to
me,
but
that
could
be,
but
that's
just
might
like
got
reaction
to
that.
A
A
B
B
The
the
method
of
contribution
vary
in
like
what
capacity
so
in
the
in
the
common
definition
of
the
metric.
It
has
all
the
locations
of
engagement,
so
we
could.
Maybe
it
would
make
more
sense
to
like
list
the
specific
ones
that
we
would
look
at
for
evolution
like
like,
reiterate
them,
or
we
could
just
pay
for
four
possible
locations
of
engagement.
You
know
refer
back
to
the
contributors
in
common
okay.
C
A
A
B
B
Like
you,
the
barrier
of
entry,
part
I,
think
is
really
important
and
then
also
just
the
number
of
them
can
it's
not
all
I
doesn't
always
make
sense
because,
like
sometimes
Shawn
will
have
people
for
his
class
like
open
a
pull
request
to
auger
just
so
they
know
what
a
pull
request
is
yeah,
which
is
not
a
exact.
You
know
one-to-one
representation
of
how
much
more
popular
auger
is
so
sometimes
it
gets
artificially
inflated.
B
A
And
so
the
only
disconnect
that
I
have
is
at
the
beginning.
We
say
how
many
contributors
are
making
the
first
contribution
to
a
given
project
and
then
later
I
say
knowing
who
they
are,
and
that
is
different
from
having
a
number
but
I
write
Hey,
because
if
you
can
calculate
the
number,
then
you
can
also
identify
who
they
are
yeah.
B
Maybe
we
could
even
just
phrase.
The
question
is
how
many
contributors
are
making
their
first
contribution
to
project
and
who
are
they
that
raise
oh
yeah?
Okay,
that's
fine,
I
was
gonna,
say
having
two
questions
in
there,
but
I
feel
like
both
of
those
are
so
are
equally
important
parts
of
this
metric,
specifically
that
I
think
it's
okay.
C
B
Would
we
say
your
first
contribution
is
when
you
open
your
first
floor
request,
or
is
it
when
your
first
pull
requests
like
gets
merged,
because
some
of,
like
some
of
these
stages,
have
multiple
stages
of
engagement?
There's
some
of
some
contributions
have
like
multiple
stages.
If
that
makes
sense,
because
opening
a
pull
request
is
a
contribution,
but
if
nothing
gets
merged
after
the
poor
class
and
it
gets
closed
then
what
exactly?
Do
you
point
you
to
say
this
is
what
they
contributed.
You
know
it
kind
of
gets.
B
C
B
Think
the
I
really
reading
any
of
the
reading
the
rest
of
the
types
of
contribution,
I
can't
think
of
any
other
super
edge
cases,
but
word
and
I
think
it's
so
in
specific
cases
where
the
community
is
large
enough
ie,
something
like
will
say
like
Rails
like
if
people
ask
a
question,
a
specific
type
of
question
on
like
something
like
Stack
Overflow
about
how
to
solve
a
specific
problem
in
rails
is
asking
that
question
like
are
members
of
that
part
of
the
community?
Well,
you
know
representing
them
on
Stack
Overflow.
B
C
A
Say
you
are
a
company
that
has
a
product
and
an
open-source
core
or
software
that
you're
building
your
services
around
and
suddenly
you
have
people
showing
up
asking
questions,
then
you
might
want
to
reach
out
to
them
because
they
are
evaluating
your
product
and
could
be
interested
in
your
services.
And
so
that's
a
type
of
lead
generation.
Mm-Hmm.