►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Evolution.March.11.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Evolution.March.11.2020
B
A
Yep,
no,
it's
a
joint
good
luck.
A
month
ago.
She
is
the
senior
open
source
program,
manager
or
something,
and
so
her
role
is
to
reach
out
to
open
source
communities,
help
them
with
onboarding
help
them
understand
gitlab,
but
then
also
to
bring
in
more
volunteers
and
contributors
to
good
lab
and
those.
A
B
A
B
So
I
think
technically
I
think
what
Grima
put
grimore
lab
and
auger
and
other
tools
I
think
a
s
probably
want
to
understand
is
so
grimoire
lab
has
a
personal.
You
know
in
a
way
of
collecting
a
broad
array
of
data,
and
that's
part
of
the
value
proposition
that
people
see
for
chaos,
metrics
and
I
mean
get
lab,
is
also
sort
of
the
up-and-coming.
B
Second
definitely
I,
don't
know
how
many
open-source
projects
they
have,
but
github
is
the
main
place,
so
I
think
having
a
way
to
add
metrics
that
we
produce
that
are
generated
from
data
that
isn't
that
necessarily
on
get
lab.
So
discussion
boards
comments,
things
from
github
comparisons
with
github
repositories,
I
think
enabling
those
kinds
of
functionalities
are
central
to
what
both
peter
jia
and
auger
goo,
and
so
knowing
that
we
can
make
those
types
of
contributions
will
be
helpful.
A
B
Yes,
this
is
how
I'd
put
it
community's
ability
to
directly
to
contribute
so,
like
I
think
there
were
workarounds
for
the
grimore
lab
issues
within
github
that
were
doable.
I.
Think
what
what
sort
of
got
this
conversation
moving
was
when
I
asked
about
what
does
this
mean
that
it's
open
source
and
the
fact
that
we
can
add
chaos
metrics
directly
into
gitlab
through
open
source
contributions?
B
So
so
I
think
like
when
I
think
about
what
what
drives
me.
As
a
member
of
the
community
are
not
these
I
think
mostly
solvable
technical
issues.
It's
the
fact
that
we
can
actually
get
our
metrics
into
a
lab
like
that's
far
and
away
the
biggest
reason
to
switch
in
my
opinion,
because
everything
else
is
just
sort
of
like
technical
decision
making.
That
doesn't
just
apply
the
switching
costs,
but
this
ability
to
contribute
is
way
more
significant,
yeah.
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
I
think
I
think
that
might
work
as
well.
I
haven't
that
I
haven't
spent
enough
time
with
get
labs
issue
tracker,
but
based
on
what
has
been
described
on
the
calls
it
seems
like
that
would
make
it
easier
for
like
when
we're
on
the
evolution
call,
and
we
are
wondering
if
what
we're
doing
as
a
risk
metric
or
a
common
metric.
We
have
a
way
to
that.
A
single
issue
tracker
would
let
us
sort
of
make
that
decision
later,
instead
of
having
to
put
it
into
one
working
group
and
decide
it
at
the
time.
A
B
B
B
Yeah,
obviously,
we
still
need
to
maintain
some
kind
of.
Obviously
we
won't
lose
our
relationship
working
with
github,
since
it's
the
elephant
in
the
open-source
room
right
now,
but
I
think
we
can
demonstrate
the
chaos
value
through
contributions
to
get
lab
and
I
simply
don't
seem
to
have
a
path
where
I'm
getting
on
right.
Now.
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
Are
there
folks
who
are
involved
in
the
community
who
have
not
participated
in
the
discussion
of
to
this
point,
where
we
would
want
to
give
them
time
to
provide
input,
that's
greater
than
whatever
time
they've
had,
because
I
think
this
is
what
we
started
this
little
less
than
a
month
ago,
and
the
board
meeting
is
on
Friday
I.
Think
I
think
the
board
certainly
needs
to
approve
it
and
we
are
meeting
on
Friday.
B
My
only
question
about
whether
we
decide
to
approve
it
on
Friday
is:
if
we
feel
that
the
community
has
had
enough
time
to
like
know
about
it.
So
it
doesn't.
You
know
I
don't
want
to
alienate
members
of
the
community
by
having
it
be
this
big
surprise
that
they
didn't
track,
but
I
don't
know
if
that's
an
issue
or
if
it's
not
an
issue
so
like
I'm,
okay,
with
the
board
approving
at
Friday
I.
B
The
board
could
provide
like
sort
of
like
a
recommendation,
to
approve
and
a
recommendation
that
we
discuss
the
approval
and
formalize
it
with
the
community
like
in
the
April
call
like
that
might
be
the
lowest
risk
way
to
go
in
terms
of
making
sure
everyone
feels
like
they
had
a
say,
but
but
I
don't
know.
If
that's
okay,
I,
don't
know,
that's
a
real
concern
or
not
I
guess
the
bullet.
That
would
be
the
only
discussion.
Point
I
think
at
this
point
for
the
or
is
timing
right.
A
B
Well,
we
have
the
discussions
then
taking
like
the
discussion
of
them,
so
the
discussions
been
taking
place
on
a
few
community
calls
I'm
just
looking
when
it's
the
first
meeting
in
April
yeah
they'd,
be
the
sixth
I
mean
I,
think
we
could
make
it
that's
how
a
topic
of
like
final
approval
on
the
like,
because
the
first
call
on
the
month
is
the
sort
of
community
call
or
everyone's
there,
and
so
like
just
waiting.
Another
six
days
is
that
but
I
mean
I
think
it
might
be
just
it
might
seem.
B
A
B
B
Naive,
the
governing
board
isn't
informed
I
think
I
mean
I'm,
trying
to
think
of
who's
on
the
governing
board
that
you
may
not
be
aware.
I
can't
think
of
one
like
even
Brian.
Profits
on
calls
has
been
calls
with
us
from
time
to
time
and
I
I,
don't
know
if
I've
seen
Kate
Stewart
on
a
call
that
I'm
sure
she's
aware
of
this
discussion,
because
she
follows
the
list.
A
A
B
A
B
B
It's
the
nuke,
it's
the
computer.
Can
it's
called
contributors.