►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Evolution.Jan.16.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Evolution.Jan.16.2020
E
G
No
you're
sure
yeah,
so
I
figured
today
since
we've
got
you're
gonna
buy
the
comments
so
far
on
me
their
release,
metrics.
You
know
we
could
just
work
through
some
of
those
as
much
as
we
can.
The
time
we've
got
and
I
know,
there
was
one
in
particular
that
I
had
a
bit
of
activity
in
the
issue
section,
and
then
there
were
a
couple
of
our
requests.
G
G
Coming
in
sorry,
what's
the
issue
so
I
think
so
found
Jim
brought
up
a
good
point.
One
of
them
is
considering
types
of
contributors
who
are
not
committees
and
then
Brian
Crawford
and
the
hey-zeus
also
I,
think
discussing
the
idea
of
what
a
contributor
is
in
this
context
and
also
I
get
the
use
of
the
term
new.
C
To
read
these
again
to
see
which
ones
I
the
contributors
is
a
discussion
that
we
were
having
over
on
risk
as
well
and
we've
in
the
past.
The
discussions
been
on
the
risk
group
to
this
question
has
been
that
we,
you
know,
contributors
are
people
that
are
you
know,
they're
new
things
they
may
commit.
They
may
not
commit,
but
they
do
things
other
than
committing.
So
the
contributor
list
includes
all
the
people
who
make
a
contribution
to
the
project.
That's
recorded
in
the
trace
data.
H
C
G
Think
the
idea
of
a
new
contributor
is
these
thing,
the
idea
of
a
new
contributor?
It's
it
almost
seems
to
me
like
to
be
new,
is
the
their
only
new
when
they've
never
done
anything
before
you're
the
repository
and
as
soon
as
they've
done
anything
they're
long,
no
longer
a
new
contributor.
In
any
sense,
they
just
have
not
there
and
they've
never
closed
an
issue
before,
but
they're
still
a
contributor
I.
Think
that's
the
to
me.
That's
what
the
that
point
is
that
Brian
is
making
which
has
some
merits
to
it.
G
C
C
C
Like
I
mean
all
of
this
sacred
I
mean
all
this
is
going
to
be
operationalized,
that
the
broadest
scope
would
be
all
of
the
repositories
in
your
worldview
right
right.
So
none
of
sort
of
looking
at
things.
Other
people
have
done
on
different
projects
outside
of
our
worldview.
So
much
I
would
think
the
metric
would
just
be
closing
an
issue
for
the
first
time
on
a
specific
project.
A
C
C
E
A
I
think
that's
fair,
because
I
think
that
would
be
interesting
to
know.
For
example,
if
we
just
look
at
the
chaos
project,
how
many
new
people
are
closing
issues
in
augur
versus
how
many
new
people
are
closing
issues
in
grimore
lab
and
particularly
on,
say,
sorting
hat
versus
metrics?
That
would
be
interesting.
Yeah
I
think
that's
Shawn.
Yours
captures
that.
G
A
C
C
A
The
if
it's
a
obviously
persons
as
broader
mm-hmm,
then
contributors,
so
it's
just
a
level
of
specificity,
I
guess
his
person
could
be
like
my
wife
right
right.
Who's
never
contributed
to
the
project
in
any
way,
but
a
contributor
would
have
to
be
somebody
who
has
contributed
to
the
project
in
some
way.
So
that
could
person
who
has
helped
with
event.
G
G
C
H
C
A
A
G
C
E
A
G
D
C
A
G
B
A
G
G
D
D
G
E
G
D
G
G
G
G
C
Indicated
yeah,
essentially
including
this
reopen
phenomena
when
I
did
this
stuff
for
this
science,
I
showed
them
the
time
that
it
took
to
close
each
issue
the
first
time
and
the
time
that
it
closed
the
last
and
most
of
the
time,
they're
the
same
that
sometimes
they,
and
so,
if
I
want
to
know
people
clothing
issues
for
the
first
time,
I
guess:
I,
don't
really
I,
don't
care
a
ton,
I
guess.
But
how
is
it
written
right
now?
Is
it
is
reopening
excluded?
It's
an
optional
I
mean
that's
how
I
it's
an
optional
filter.
G
C
Yeah
I
mean
I
would
say
that
filters.
You
know
for
some
some
analyses
you
may
want
to
exclude.
You
mean
one
of
the
point,
eight
issues
that
are
current
and
if
that's
what
you're
looking
at
then
you're
going
to
have
an
indication
that
someone
closed
an
issue,
but
if
it's
reopened,
they
didn't
really
close.
It's
like
the
issues
not
resolved
so.
C
G
F
A
G
G
G
A
A
conversation
yep.
L
G
C
G
M
A
H
D
G
G
So
I
will
add
those
in
for
this
one
and
then
I,
don't
remember
if
I
fixed
this
one,
but
it's
just
the
short
rename
so
I
can
do
that
and
then
I
think
the
only
other
one
was
Xavier.
I
see
her.
Also
on
the
call
was
this
one
about
code
changes
and
then
I
also
think
there
were
some
whole
rest
s--
attached
to
it
as
well.
If
I
remember
correctly,
so
this
one
for
code
changes
in
code
changes
lines.
G
L
N
H
N
Have
guidelines
to
define
the
massage
they
use
in
too
far
they're
coming
and
with
this
we
can
filter
the
the
commits
and
classify
this
commit.
If
is
fixed
or
adding
a
new
feature
or
review
I,
don't
know,
but
I
think
you
can
use
this
match
this
tag
to
classify
the
commit
and
count
the
line
or
the
commit.
G
N
A
J
A
A
A
G
D
G
C
A
G
M
H
H
D
C
G
N
F
Here,
for
posterity
sake,
follow
same
instructions
as
pull
request,
yeah.
G
F
D
G
G
A
C
C
G
C
That
office
is
written,
that's
I
mean
I,
think
the
so
the
challenge
I
mean
I'm.
Fine
with
that
is.
The
challenge
is
that
that
will
then
become
a
function
of
how
many
issues
are
open
right
yeah.
So
we
won't,
we
won't
get
any
distinction
you
know
will
if
we
want
to
know
a
project
for
those
10
issues,
how
long
they're
open
on
average.
Everybody
want
to
compare
with
an
issue,
but
probably
300
issues:
I'm
Wendy
I'm
not
going
to
have
a
metric
that
I
can
use
to
compare
repos
with
different
issue
biomes.
G
You've
got
one
issue:
that's
been
open
for
a
year
and
a
couple
of
issues
we've
only
been
open
for
a
couple
days.
Then
you
have
that
year.
That's
adding
all
of
that
to
it'll
increase
that
number
by
a
lot.
Of
course,
you
also
have
that
problem
with
average,
because
you
get
those
outliers
I
prefer
average
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
think
I
do
too
I
think
average
or
median
so
so.
Aggregated
no
means
this.
M
C
Good
I,
I
guess
I'm
questioning
your
time.
Well,
I
guess:
I,
don't
know
what
Tom's
really
thinking
but
I
question
the
utility
of
having
the
aggregated
time
that
open
issues
are
open
on
a
project
just
if
I
take
200
issues
and
total
up
all
their
time.
I
just
question
what
that's
signaling
to
me
at
all.
M
A
C
So,
if
I
wanted
to
make
it
more
clear
to
a
reader
who
hasn't
processed
all
these
different
mathematical
words,
I
might
just
have
the
question,
be
how
long
isn't
it?
How
long
she's
been
left
open
in
a
project
how
long
ago
and
left
open
in
a
project?
That's
the
question
aggregation
in
the
definition
is:
can
it
took
me
a
while
to
get
my
head
around
yeah.
E
M
D
C
F
E
M
M
L
N
G
L
L
G
J
G
C
E
E
C
G
G
So
I
think
we
got
through
both
of
those,
so
we
didn't
do
both
of
those
I'm
just
going
to
double
check.
Oh
this
was
the
one
that
name
I
know
what
to
do
it.
This
one
I
was
just
waiting
on
that
link
from
Georg,
which
I
have
so
I
can
update
that
one
quest
and
then
I
think
all
the
other
ones.
All
the
other
release
candidate
comments
were
just
the
minor
stuff.
I,
don't
yeah,
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
anything
in
the
general
release
notes.
A
Yeah,
so
the
release
notes
is
for
me,
so
this
is
part
part
of
what
I'm
asking
this
is
why
I'm
on
this
call
in
part,
so
I'd
really
like
you
Carter
to
fill
out
so
go
back
to
that
release,
notes,
mm-hmm
and
then
in
the
comment.
If
you
could
just
give
me
a
bullet
or
two
about
what
has
been
changed
since
the
last
release
in
evolution,
okay,
so
including
X
number
of
new
metrics,
you
know
updated
existing
set
of
metrics.