►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.GMD.February.20.2019
Description
CHAOSS.GMD.February.20.2019
A
We
we
don't
even
have
snow
or
ice
or
anything
this
school
district,
the
school
district
like
crap
his
pants
and
called
school
way
too
early
last
night
and
I've
been
bitching
about
it
on
social
media
all
day
cuz.
It
just
throws
my
whole
flow.
When
the
kids
aren't
in
school,
it
certainly
does
feel
like
five
inches.
Certainly
we
had
nothing.
It's
ridiculous,
it
is
Kate
is
like
you
have
to
stop
complaining
about
it.
On
Facebook,
ooh,.
D
A
A
A
We
can't
we
can't
replicate
it.
I
think
we
need
to
ask
that
person
for
a
URL,
I,
think
didn't
Kevin
venture,
just
send
a
note.
Evan
did
oh
yeah,
he
said
yeah
Kevin
said
URL,
so
I
think
we're
good
to
go.
You
know
exactly
what
Kevin
said:
good
job
Kevin
and
then
there's
an
update
readme
from
what
weekly
call
a
week
ago.
We
discussed
this
on
the
call
last
time
a
week
ago.
So,
like
eight
days
ago,
we
discussed
it
on
the
general
call
and
then
seven
days
ago
we
discussed
it
on
this
call.
A
B
A
Yeah
so
he's
paying
us
back
and
indicated
that
he
will
get
to
it
on
both
issues
61
and
for
8,
which
leaves
50.
Community
managers
might
perpetually
unfinished
that's
almost
done,
but
not
done
and
refined.
The
code
development
focus
area
number
44.
I
can't
remember
what
the
status
of
this
one
is.
Okay,
so
there
are
pull
requests
for
a
specific
metric
on
tour
requests
72.
So,
let's
see
if
flow
requests.
72
is
okay,
I'm
gonna
for
refining
the
code
about
one
focus
area.
A
A
And
then
maybe
I'll
sign
he's
just
I,
basically
I
just
don't
want
to
close
it
without
checking
with
hey
soos,
because
he
opened
it.
Okay,
I'm
sure,
we've
left
it
open
for
a
reason.
We
just
didn't
put
it
in
the
comments.
What
that
reason
is-
and
so
I
just
made
a
comment
that
moves
us
over
to
pull
requests.
A
A
A
A
We
can
determine
from
behavior
in
the
repository
itself
the
role
of
maintainer
I.
Don't
think
there
is
a
get
referenced.
So
in
the
repository
in
the
git
repository
I,
don't
think-
and
someone
can
correct
me-
maybe
Alberto
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I,
don't
think
there
is
a
way
that
maintainer
is
represented
in
the
metadata
of
a
repository
I.
Think
it's
a
custom.
A
D
A
I'm
gonna
ask
since
Kate
and
I
were
discussing
this
recently
on
her
review,
maybe
year
review
Matt
sure,
and
this
one
because
I
think
I
think
this
really
speaks
to
some
of
the
open
source
customs
that
you
and
Kate
have
spent
more
time
talking
about.
Then
then
I
have
trying
to
diversify
the
number
of
people
reviewing
use
cases.
A
B
A
A
A
A
And
if
they
don't,
then
we
should
create
them
and
I.
Think,
given
the
metrics
release,
work
that
we're
trying
to
do
yeah,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
any
changes
to
the
names
of
metrics
that
we
Institute
in
this
repository
get
propagated
to
the
metrics
repository
yeah,
so
I
I
had
suggested
just
posting.
A
B
A
So
after
we
get
this
one
reviewed,
then
yeah
yep,
our
request,
looks
geared
was
suggested
by
the
algorithms
at
github
as
a
reviewer
for
this
port
up
slightly
I
will
I'll
go
with
the
algorithms
on
that
another.
Maybe
ask
Alberto,
if
you
don't
mind
reviewing,
maybe
let
me
great
Armstrong
Armstrong.
What's
your
github
ID,
so.
A
So
I
don't
so
it
doesn't.
Allow
me
to
request
you
for
a
review.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
means
you
have
to
be.
Does
that
mean
Armstrong
is
not
like
a
member
of
the
organization?
No,
you
should
be
able
to
request
anybody
shouldn't
you
I
thought
so,
but
I'm
putting
in
you
have
ID.
Then
it's
not
it's
not
letting
you
take
so
I.
A
F
A
E
A
B
Just
found
some
errors,
no
errors
in
your
in
your
either
your
tables.
So
they'd
be
things
like
if
you
take
a
look
at
update
issue
resolution,
yeah
I'm,
looking
first
response
to
issue
duration.
So,
basically,
if
you
in
your
table,
it
used
to
be
called
first
response
to
issue
duration
and
they
click
on
it
and
the
detail
page
was
called
issue
response
rate
or
something
like
that.
B
A
B
G
A
Issue
was
so
he's
you're
suggesting
issue
response
rate.
He
sees
his
suggesting
issue
response
time.
I
think
issue
response
time
makes
it
so
that
it
is
one
metric.
Do
you
mind
if
I
just
quite
at
all,
yeah?
It's
just.
Let's
call
it
issue
response
time,
and
can
you
just
resend
the
full
request,
yeah?
Well,
you
just
modify
it
in
here.
Can
I
modify,
can
I
modify
a
pull
request
that
you've
made.
B
D
A
A
B
A
D
A
A
A
Okay,
so
those
are
issues
and
pull
requests
are
standard
agenda
items.
Are
there
other
other
things
to
discuss?
There's
another
multi
that
hey-zeus
appearing
for
a
Berea?
Oh,
he
says:
hey,
lady,
no
worries.
Actually
you
can
maybe
help
us
with
pull
request,
update
community
growth,
we're
able
to
close
one
of
Matt's
pour
requests,
but
I,
just
I
wasn't
sure
if
there
was
action
required
on
pull
requests.
85.
Based
on
your
comment
made
appointment,
you
know.
C
Just
a
quick
comment
about
this
minor
change:
maybe
the
best
way
to
proceed
here
will
be
removed
open
from
the
title
of
the
dimetric,
because
in
fact,
new
contributors
at
all
the
information
do
you
need
to
have
to
understand
the
metric.
This
is
new
contributors
could
be
enough,
so
we
can
avoid
the
discussion
about
open
up
and
opening
that
is
yeah,
so
I.
I
Mean
number
eight
depart,
but
my
only
comment
is
about
the
difference
between
open
and
open,
but
now
that
we
are
not
the
english-speaking
people,
so
I'm,
not
completely
sure
bed.
As
far
as
I
understand,
if
you
have
something
like
open
issues,
mind
quickly
goes
to
issues
that
are
open
right
now,
while
the
idea
is
issues
that
were
open
doing
this
world,
which
is
different-
and
that
was
my
comment.
Yeah.
C
But
I
understand
your
comment
because
rate
bike
say
it
exactly
the
same
in
another
discussion
on
this.
But
the
thing
here
is
that
maybe
we
don't
need
to
to
put
the
word
open
because
we
are
adding
new
contributors
at
the
end,
so
issues
new
contributors.
Maybe
it
is
all
what
we
need
here
to
name
the
metric
and
we
can
have
it.
The
discussion.
G
I
I
A
I
meant
yeah,
I,
think
I,
think
new
contributors
of
issues,
that's
pretty
clear,
sorry,
yeah
new
contributors
and
the
new
contributors
of
issues,
so
the
fix
here
would
be
Matt.
Your
correction
is
that
open
issue.
New
contributors
is
what
it's
called
on
the
page:
that's
yeah,
okay,
so
if
we
change
it
to
open
issues,
so
what
would
Hayes
is
going
to
be
new
contributors
of
issues?
Is
that
what
you
said?
Oh.
I
D
A
F
H
F
A
Context
of
the
should
it's
a
good
question.
Kevin
in
the
I
opened
up
the
community
growth
section
of
the
file
here
and
most
of
the
metrics
have
new
contributors
or
contributors
as
the
prefix
and
the
it's
the
community
growth
area.
So
it
looks
like
we're
trying
to
make
new
contributors.
The
main
thing
in.
F
F
I
Any
case
that
there
is
supporting
here,
because
that
the
focus
could
be
both
negative
errors
of
the
old
issues,
depending
on
how
you
look
at
it,
I
mean
when
you're
looking
at
activity.
For
instance,
it
is
pretty
clear
that
you're
talking
about
issues
it
should
whatever,
but
right
now
you
are
talking
about
the
community,
which
means
in
some
sense
you're
talking
about
people
and
people.
Is
there
new
contributors
heart-opening,
but
in
any
case,
I'm
happy
with
any
of
those
as
as
much
as
we
avoid
using
open,
I'm
happy
with
that.
A
I
A
I
Yeah,
let's
iterate
on
top
of
that,
because
you
are
right-
maybe
we're
entering
a
lot
into
the
details,
but
the
main
purpose
was
just
to
align
the
names
so
maybe
looking
to
keep
on
that
and
the
producing
equal
work
was
trying
to
make
this
because
I
think
what
Kevin
says
is
also
important.
So
to
have
some
consistency
is
important.
I
A
And
I
think
before
you
got
here
his
suits,
we
did
make
the
comment
that
when
we
changed
things
in
here
with
the
metrics
release
coming
up,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
create
that
changes
back
into
the
metrics
repository,
and
that
suggested
that
we
create
issue.
Is
that
right,
Matt?
You
suggest
we
create
issues
in
the
metrics
repository
one
yep.
A
I
In
any
case,
as
somebody
suggested
yesterday
in
the
general
median,
maybe
we
can
open
an
issue.
You
know
a
repository
just
to
check
for
consistency,
it's
giving
so
that
we
can
ensure
that
we
always
have
issues
for
also
need
to
be
reversed
or
whatever,
but
that
we
are
consistent
and
that's
something
that
anybody
can
do.
J
I
A
A
A
Make
sure
oh
yeah,
yeah,
yeah,
I,
guess
I
didn't
open
it.
I
I
said
the
line
names
of
all
metrics,
it's
names
of
metrics.
If
you
remember
92
now
and
I
use
the
example,
new
contributors
of
issues
and
closed
issues
of
new
contributors
are
not
fully
consistent
and
they're.
Naming
I.
Think
I
think
that's
the
gist
of
what
you
just
said
as
well.
Right.
I
A
A
What
was
the
outcome
of
the
we
were
gonna
do
them?
We've
talked
about
the
metrics
release
and
I
know.
We
discussed
it
again
in
the
meeting
yesterday,
but
I
don't
was
there
any
I,
don't
recall
that
we
reached
a
conclusion
on
how
we're
gonna
specifically
release
the
metrics,
because
I
know
that
I
know
there
were
two
different
conversations
going
on.
Well,
we
were
gonna
we're
gonna
resolve
it
at
the
chaos
board
meeting.
Is
that
right.
I
A
D
A
G
A
A
We've
got
a
couple
weeks
and
then
make
a
decision
about
ongoing
updates
at
the
board
meeting
so
that
when
we
go
to
the
Leadership
Summit,
we
have
as
a
group
chaos.
These
are
the
metrics
that
we've
just
released.
Then
we
can
resolve
the
ongoing
update
thing,
which
is
I.
Think
that's
what's
under
discussion
is
whether
the
updates
are
sort
of
formalized
or,
if
they're
ongoing,
and
they
were
about
I.
F
G
F
G
But
if
we
move
the
files
into
a
different
folder
then
become
just
as
well
put
them
in
their
own
repositories.
Let's
say
the
metrics
repository
haven't
unified
in
one
location,
then
we
don't
have
to
spread
it
out
across
the
repositories.
The
only
reason
right
proposal,
one
proposed-
that
is
so
that
we
do
get
continuous
updates
without
additional
work.
G
A
A
A
But
we
could
discuss
that
at
the
board
meeting.
I
think
my
point
was
that
we
could
we
could
do
a
release,
because
both
of
these
proposals
are
really
dealing
with
the
ongoing
release.
So
we
could
do
a
release
in
advance
that
leadership
summit
without
resolving
the
question
about
how
to
manage
ongoing
releases.
I
think
so.
I
I've
not
have
any
time
infrastructure,
of
course,
tabled
metrics,
because
right
now
in
the
working
groups,
in
many
cases
we
are
in
an
inconsistent
state
which
rational,
let's
say
not:
medical
consumption,
so
I
grab
the
other
assigned
their
students
is
to
a
given
point,
maybe
just
before
the
airport
meeting,
for
instance,
try
to
have,
but
we
need
by
the
working
group
and
then
and
then
were
to
put.
That
is
something
that,
of
course
we
can.
I
This
can
well
my
point
of
view
that
would
be
the
metric
to
the
digital
or
we
have
the
standard
or
stable
or
whatever
version
of
the
metrics
and
the
working
group
decide
it
to
be,
and
that
should
be
consistent
and
everything,
and
it
would
be
basically
a
matter
of
closing
the
repository
for
the
working
group
and
said.
Ok,
this
Russian
disc
made
is
the
real
and
then
the
the
working
group
can
go
on
and
it
again
came
back
to
an
inconsistent
state
because
they
are
moving
some
metrics
from
one
place
to
another
sensors.
I
I
F
I
I
Not
exactly
right,
so
that's
something
like
we're
sober
and
want
to
cheer
or
something.
Oh
yeah,
that
that's
not
sufficient.
So
I
I'm,
I
think
that
people
maintain
in
their
world
the
website
can
decide
over
there.
But
what
my
to
do?
The
main
point
is
to
be
sure
that
we
can
really
something
and
call
it
version
something
and
that
everybody
agrees
on
what
said
and
that's
the
people
worsen
until
there
is
a
new
one
here.
G
B
I
Because
we
can
say
also
today,
that
did
nothing
is
in
stable
and
we
try
to
do
that.
Who
are
certain
anything
troubling
for
the
next
4
min
or
world,
and
all
the
working
groups
do
I
didn't
have
any
specific
you
made
that
we
can
say
this
is
our
what
we
knew
and
that
would
be
in
the
website.
Somehow
so,
I
don't
mind
if
it
is
by
copying
to
the
metric
suppository
for
you
to
spoon
directly
from
the
work
to
do
a
tutorial
available.
I
But
what
I'm
just
trying
to
capture
is
a
year
that,
at
least
in
the
case
of
the
gene
they
work
group.
In
many
cases,
metrics
are
inconsistent
so,
for
instance,
right
now,
some
of
the
metrics
made
and
have
the
right
name,
some
of
the
files
of
bubbles
under
the
name
operating
the
travel
world
to
ensure
at
some
point.
This
is
right
now,
the
in
the
sense.
I
B
I
I
G
B
G
B
You
know
something
along
those
lines
of
release,
oriented
these
focus
groups
that
would
potentially
have
releases.
So
that's
that's
a
total
of
about
five
focus
areas
across
the
two
working
groups,
mm-hmm.
So
within
the
folk
within
the
focus
areas,
there's
usually
a
grand
total
of
anywhere
from
say
five
to
seven
metrics.
So
we're
talking
about
like
thirty
five
metrics
total
right
now,
given
plus
or
minus
yeah,.
G
B
B
A
B
That's
the
Wednesday
yeah.
Then
you
can
work
on
your
focus
area,
even
if
it
goes
up
to
the
website
today
you
can
rework
those
focus
areas
tomorrow.
Who
cares
just
keep
working
in
there?
Just
keep
doing
the
work
that
you
do,
that
the
webpage
is
the
stable
spot
and
to
me
right
now,
just
have
Kevin
Kevin
managing
the
website
spend
like
probably
a
couple
hours
creating
the
page
the
first
time
through
and
then
maybe
like
30
minutes,
okay,
updating
on
a
new
release.
This
is
not
that
much
time
so.
G
B
A
A
We're
sure
that
fundamentally
they're
not
going
to
change
like
maybe
they'll,
be
detailed
out
or
have
some
it's
attitude
them,
but
the
definition
of
the
thing
that
we're
all
clear
about
and
good
on,
because
if
we
change
the
definition
of
the
thing
later,
that's
what's
going
to
cause
problems
downstream.
I
think
well,.
I
Right
now,
maybe
we
could
gas
pool
manually
or
focus
on
all
tiles
in
the
matrix
pods
to
those
for
the
perky
lives,
because
that's
going
to
be
a
rental
of
method
yeah.
If
the
procedure
works
from
the
quantity
or
people
are
happy
with
the
results
we
can
try
to
automate
to
the
next
one
because
of
the
median
is
not
going
to
be
difficult,
just
parsing
the
focus
area,
files
founding
the
names
of
the
files
for
the
metrics
and
automatically
grabbing
them
and
uploading
to
the
workshop
worthy.
I
So
it's
not
that
difficult
matter
to
the
first
one,
since
we
are
not
completely
sure
of
the
result.
These
people
are
going
to
be
happy
enough
with
the
product.
Okay,
maybe
we
can
with
manually,
not
invest
in
automation,
see
where
that
works,
and
it
could
work
for
the
next
release
with
like
a
community
I.
D
G
The
third
strategy
works
going
going
back
to
the
original
question
that
Sean
posed
releasing
metrics
before
the
Leadership
Summit.
There
are
many
benefits
to
it
and
I
think.
If
we
go
the
the
route
that
we
just
talked
about,
where
Kevin
just
points
to
commit
version
of
the
metrics,
then
we
don't
need
to
build
any
technical
infrastructure
right
now
and
we
can
talk
at
the
governing
board
meeting
about
changing
that.
But
we
have
a
minimal
Viable
Product
and
released
before
the
big
meeting.
Yes,.
B
A
The
thing
that
I
think
was
in
it
was
important
from
my
that's
why
I
brought
up
he
can
release.
Something
is
really
the
proposals
are
dealing
with
the
future
releases
and
the
first
release.
We
could
just
decide
when
we're
going
to
do
that
and
if
it's
before
the
meeting
I
do
think
it
gives
us
something
like
you
said
that
concrete
to
discuss
with
other
people
who
are
not
involved
in
chaos,
and
it's
something
we
can
point
them
to
as
evident
since
the
last
leadership,
which
I
think
is
a
win
as
well.
I
Normally,
what
we
should
do
is
to
relieve
the
release
candidate.
Yes,
before
the
meeting
and
in
the
ball,
we
can
formally
broke
it.
This
is
diversion
in
world,
so
it
would
be
like
before
their
decimate.
We
believe
person,
1,
0,
good
candidate,
1
and
I'm,
pretty
much
sure
that
that's
going
to
be
a
separate
assignment,
but
still
we
can
say
the
vendor
to
be
in
this
and
made
if
you
have
any
come-
and
we
are
right
in
the
right
moment
because
we
are
talking-
and
this
is
going
to
be
a
poll
itself.
D
I
It's
a
bit
more
intuitive
in.
If
there
are
major
issues
we
could
even
even
be
later
with
it,
but
I'm
I'm
sure
that
that's
not
going
to
happen,
but
it
is
letting
the
community
now.
This
is
the
proposal
by
the
working
groups,
but
still
it
will
happen
a
main
concern.
We
can
just
not
into
it
now,
because
this
is
a
serious
candidate.
What
do
you
think
I.
A
I
B
B
A
G
A
I
F
F
D
G
I
imagine
one
central
web
page
that
is
slash
metrics,
where
we
have
a
list
of
all
the
focus
areas
and
underneath
the
focus
areas.
We
have
the
names
of
the
metrics
which
link
to
the
detail
pages
and
then
okay
metric
detail
pages
it's
on
page,
so
the
focus
areas
themselves
do
not
get
their
own
pages
because
they
already
included
in
them
stash
metrics
landing
list,
page
I,
don't
work
I.
B
Agree,
I
think
that
main
metric
space
age
is
a
focus.
The
five
focus
areas
from
the
different
working
groups,
I
think
I'm.
Just
repeating
what
you
said
Georg
when
the
the
main
metrics
page
does
it
listen,
I
mean
the
/.
What
is
it
/,
metrics
/
metrics
is
it's
the
five.
The
first
level
heading
is
the
names
of
the
five
focus
areas
or
maybe
the
first
level
heading
is
GMB
and
D&I.
A
B
So
let
me
just
so:
we
got
OP
level
heading.
Is
growth,
maturity
and
decline,
and
diversity?
Inclusion,
that's
the
first
level
heading.
The
second
level
heading
under
gmv
is
going
to
be
the
names
of
the
two
focus
areas
and
then
underneath
those
those
second
level
headings
will
simply
be
the
table.
I
think
that
you
have
on
your
repository
pages
right
now,
that's
it
so
that's!
This
is
the
first
page
you.
A
B
I
A
B
The
metric
repository
I
can
just
I
can
keep
that
aligned
during
an
ongoing
basis.
That's
that's
not
a
big
deal,
but
when
the
when
you
release
quarterly,
say
I'll
just
pick
a
timeframe,
then
yes,
it's
quite
possible
that
that
main
metrics
page
will
be
updated
because
you've
added
a
new
focus
area
or
you've
added
new
metrics,
and
it's
also
possible
that
the
detail
page
for
one
of
the
metrics
will
be
updated.
B
I
B
G
G
D
I
B
I
That's
fine
I
think
that
we
are
not
understanding
each
other,
so
I
completely
sure
that
my
only
concern
was
with
this
information
that
they
are
right
in.
There
is
going
to
be
exactly
what
we
have
in
the
core
info
to
share
file
just
by
clicking
the
file
and
uploading
it
to
the
website,
or
we
are
going
to
have
some
kind
of
variation
of
it,
which
is
what
you
are
doing
right
now.
You
do
yep.
So
what
will
be
unhappy
unhappy
with
more
things
that
will
operating?
D
B
So
whatever
so,
for
example,
in
the
GMB
focus
area,
community
growth,
the
goal
somebody
just
with
the
goal
in
their
identified
size
project
community,
well
what
the
text
that
will
be
on
that
landing
pages.
Whatever
the
text
is
on
that
focus
area
page
at
the
the
date
that
you
tell
Kevin
agree,
that's
it
and
if
you
choose
to
change
it
the
next
day
great,
but
it
doesn't
change
on
the
website.
I.
I
I
G
Difference
is
that
in
our
release
landing
page,
we
will
not
have
all
of
the
metrics
that
are
in
the
focus
areas,
because
only
some
of
them
will
be
tagged.
So
it
will
be
a
shorter
list
and
the
link
has
to
point
to
the
website
not
to
the
working
document
in
the
repository.
So
we
need
a
different
list
for
the
released
metrics
from
the
focus
area
pages
in
the
repository
okay.