►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Risk.March.16.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Risk.March.16.2020
A
A
A
Had
a
test
to
identify
the
key
research
and
so
did
johann
in
the
field
identifying
core
structure.
Taxonomy
is
because
there
are
some
structured
text
on
amis,
most
of
which
emerge
out
of
the
Bugzilla
world,
where
a
taxonomy
already
existed
for
defining
explaining
the
kinds
of
issues
that
are
open
and.
C
A
Would
I
would
say
that
that
is
started,
but
not
finished?
I
have
an
accumulation
of
labels,
but
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
to
share
it.
In
other
words,
it's
it's
a
large
list,
and
it
feels
like
my
instinct
is
that
there's
probably
a
good
way
to
use
it
use
for
program
of
some
kind
and
I'm
not
crying
because
I'm
sad,
but
because
I
think
my
allergies.
D
D
We
have
a
whiteboard
an
equivalent
of
a
whiteboard
with
stickies
and
start
to
do
a
quite
frankly,
a
gripping
exercise
and
I.
Don't
know
what
online
facility
lets
us
do
that,
but
I
became
for
doing
a
session
where
we
could
just
serve,
have
some
sort
of
screen
share
and
we
just
start
moving
stickies
around
into
buckets
equivalently.
You
know
what
I
mean.
A
C
F
D
Up
with
a
set
of
items
for
the
words
and
then
aside,
there
figuring
columns
we
slot
them
under,
or
you
know,
randomly
moving
them
around
and
then
putting
circles
around
similar
things,
which
is
what
we
do
here
in
person.
But
I
like
the
notion
of
doing
some
sort
of
exercise
like
that,
through
the
whole
rejection.
D
Really
Sean,
if
you
wanted
to
give
me
the
OP
me,
if
you
wanted
to
basically
send
me
the
master
list
of
words,
I
can
take
it
first
step
and
then
we
can
maybe
iterate
from
that
mm-hmm.
That's
something
I
can
do.
You
know
actually
I
probably
enjoy
myself
doing
it.
So
for
that
I,
like
the
third
thing,
okay,
yeah.
A
What
I'm
thinking
is
that
we
can
use
the
existing
literature
and
an
initial
scan
of
the
words
that
are
in
there,
so
the
literature
doesn't
cover
things
that
are
showing
up
in
the
tags
like
UX
or
user
interface,
and
things
like
that.
You
know
more
emergent
topics
that
weren't
studied
10
years
ago
and
a
lot
of
these
papers
were
brought
brought
out.
Somebody
combined
in
literature
and
little
axial,
open
and
axial
coding.
A
I
can
I
could
do
that.
It's
basically
just
running
a
query
that
I
already
have
across
the
20
or
25
different,
augur
instances
that
we
have
running
that
have
that
data
and
the
the
list
and
the
counts
are
that's,
that's
relatively
easy
and
it
it
also
resets.
It
becomes
a
massive
list,
but
you
can
quickly
shorten
it
by
only
focusing
on
the
top
end.
A
D
Having
you
know
the
ID
and
then
how
many
projects
have
the
same
label?
If
you
can
get
me
that
effectively?
As
you
know,
a
massive
spreadsheet
mm-hmm
I
can
probably
take
it
to
a
pass
of
trying
to
do
some
elements
of
groupings
and
sorting
and
things
like
that.
I
can
do
I
find
spreadsheets,
read
the
soothing
and
I
guess:
I
can
just
suck
we
attack.
We
can
just
sort
by
the
tags
in
the
spreadsheet
like
take
another
column
and
just
start
putting
it
a
general
categorization.
D
A
B
G
D
B
Just
gonna
start
it
kind
of
based
on
github,
so
the
idea
was
it
was
I
was
just
gonna
start
the
template
of
the
metric
upon
which
we
could
kind
of
talk
through
those
kinds
of
questions.
So
I
wasn't
I,
wasn't
kind
of
formalizing
anything
out
of
the
gate,
but
I
was
thinking
in
my
mind,
I'm
thinking,
github.
A
D
A
D
B
So
I
had
a
kind
of
a
question
on
this
to
NAT
misra,
so
I
don't
know
if
you've
said
what
you
needed
to
say:
I
did.
Okay,
I
was
also
thinking
about
libraries,
Shawn
mm-hmm
libraries,
I,
oh
yeah,
everybody's
familiar
with
it
at
this
point
and
I
think
it
falls
squarely
in
the
risk
area,
and
so
do
we
do
we
want
to
start
thinking
about
in
the
chaos
project,
supporting
libraries
or
integrating
it
into
auger
or
I
mean?
Is
that
even
something
we
want
to
think
about?
You
can
speak.
A
G
A
C
A
A
B
B
A
A
It
it
covers
one
part
of
the
coin.
It
doesn't
cover
the
other
and
mm-hmm,
but
I
also
think
import
dependencies
are
perhaps
a
little
bit
less
complicated
to
track,
because
every
language
has
its
own
way
of
declaring
imports
and
it.
It
does
seem
to
me
that
what
github
is
doing
right
now
with
its
your
hub,
will
tell
you
if
you're
relying
on
a
package
and
it
isn't
up
to
the
latest
best
secure
version,
which
is
helpful
and
I.
Think
we
there's
two
approaches
we
can
take.
C
F
A
A
So
so
much
for
that
idea,
and-
and
there
were
some
imperfections
in
the
libraries
that
I
owed
data-
that
required
cleanup
on
our
part
as
well-
and
they
and
there
are
there's
a
yeah.
There
are
definitely
challenges.
And
when
working
with
libraries
that
IO,
for
example,
a
lot
of
libraries
depend
on
the
exact
same
repo
mm-hmm.
A
So
we
had
I
think
an
average
of
50
and
as
many
as
like
1600
different
libraries
that
were
embedded
in
different
path.
Structures
of
any
one
repository
and
this
sort
of
makes
sense.
Because
what
they're
doing
is
creating
the
compilable
code
for
different
operating
systems
within
which
these
libraries
might
be
imported
or
or
used.
A
C
A
D
A
And
this
is
essentially
and
I
think
we
talked
about
this
last
time
using
network
analysis
to
try
to
understand
who
is
which
which
pull
requests
which
pieces
of
code
are
moving,
are
sort
of
dominated
by
one
or
more
people,
and
then
how
do
those
patterns
of
influence
propagate
throughout
the
rest
of
the
system?
Your.
A
G
A
A
A
B
B
C
B
What
I
mean
by
that
is
the
discussion
that
came
up
in
the
board
meeting
on
Friday,
which
was
asking
the
working
groups
to
think
about
how
the
metrics
that
they're,
putting
forward
we're
actually
making
an
impact
in
the
world.
You
don't
I
mean,
like
other
than
just
a
working
group,
coming
up
with
metrics
for
metrics
sake,.
B
So
we
can
talk
about
it
now,
like
I
said
in
the
luxury
of
having
Katie.
Here
is
obviously
yours
like
super
connected
with
other
groups
as
well.
So
a
lot
of
the
conversations
that
you
bring
are
about
what
you're
seeing
in
the
world
and
how
you
want
those
things
to
be
translated
and
captured
here
in
this
group.
So.