►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Value.June.28.2019
Description
CHAOSS.Value.June.28.2019
A
B
A
C
A
B
E
B
A
Okay,
anybody
wanna
have
more
discussion
on
that
one
or
you
want
to
move
on
under
the
next
one
move
on
and
I
think,
even
if
what
you
can
just
get
to
done
today,
that'd
be
good
cuz
we'll
meet
next
Friday
no
bill
well
within
the
window
of
okay,
okay.
So
it's
true
velocity
what
just
speed
of
closing
an
issue.
E
E
E
Labor
investment,
okay
issue
velocity,
so
here
is
here's
the
idea
that
I
can't
hear
so
when
you're,
looking
at
value
from
the
point
of
view
of
an
open
source
program,
office
manager,
one
of
the
things
potentially
that
you
could
say
to
your
bosses
is
hey.
You
know
what
we're
bringing
to
the
table
is
a
way
to
innovate
around
things
that
people
really
care
about
in
a
way
that
we
can't
in-house.
E
So
we
can
increase
your
speed
of
innovation
by
putting
things
into
the
open
source
realm
in
a
way
that
you
can't
duplicate
if
it's,
if
it's
just
looked
at
by
in-house
people.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
the
the
raw
idea
that
I
had
around
innovation
velocity.
So
the
this
would
be
that
your
open-source
projects
are
gonna
have
more
issue
velocity.
E
In
other
words,
the
the
number
of
issues
that
are
closed
are
greater
and
the
amount
of
time
that
issues
are
open
is
smaller,
that
that
you're
going
to
be
able
to
deliver
a
greater
innovation
issue,
velocity
with
open
source-
and
you
can
within
in-house
repos,
okay
and
I,
would
argue
or
I
would
I
would
say
that
issue
velocity.
You
could
you
could
look
at
as
a
proxy
for
innovation,
so
most
business
of
offices
are
going
to
be
very
interested
in
speed
and
they're
going
to
be
interested
in
innovation.
You
know
we
want
to.
E
We
want
to.
We
want
to
move
our
product
faster
than
our
competitors
and
we
want
to
have
more
innovation
sort
of
embedded
in
our
assets
than
our
competitors
so
issue.
Velocity
least
in
my
mind
as
I
was
writing
this
up.
I
was
I
was
thinking
well
issue
of
velocities
like
proxy
for
these
values
that
I
think
business
managers
are
going
to
care
about
what.
D
A
A
D
Was
thinking
the
same
thing
as
I
was
reading
this
metric?
That
issue
are
themselves
are
just
discussion.
Innovation
really
happens
through
changes
to
the
code
base
and
issues
are
apart
to
get
there,
but
they're,
not
the
final
indicator,
but
I
think
we
should
include
more
here
to
have
true
sense
of
velocity,
like
holding
first
increments.
B
A
D
A
D
C
D
E
A
F
E
B
A
I
guess
the
question
that
I
have
is:
is
the
Eric
had
pointed
out
that
the
CNC
F
is
just
about
a
pure
count
and
saying
what
it
sounds
like
with
what
Ben
was
doing
Kevin
with
commits?
But
it's
just
a
count
and
your
which
is
fine.
You
can
just
do
like
a
count
of
issues
plus
a
count
of
pull
requests,
plus
a
count
of
commits
how.
B
About
we
add,
like
average
duration
of
issue
or
average
duration
of
a
pull
request
or
average
duration,
that
that
truly
depicts
the
velocity
like,
for
example,
and
if
a
project
has
average
resolution
of
issue
is
like
maybe
two
days
so,
and
the
project
have
average
resolution
of
issues
like
five
days.
So
the
one
project
with
two
days
is
the
higher
velocity
than
the
one.
F
A
A
D
A
F
F
A
A
A
F
D
So
you're
creating
from
the
velocity
metric
that
seems
in
a
few
Z's,
so
we
are
deviating
from
the
velocity
metric
at
CMC
activities.
So
I
have
a
question
for
und,
since
you
put
this
together
initially
before
we
move
too
far
away
from
your
course.
Not
you
have
in
here
space
metrics,
also
broken
out
by
contributor
type,
and
my
question
is:
is
that
what
does
that
do
and
how
it
should
be
incorporated,
or
is
this
even
important
to
incorporate
for
velocity.
A
A
E
A
D
So
I
was
a
thing
about
the
same
thing
just
now,
because
when
you
have
time
to
close
issues,
lower
number
is
typically
better
time
to
close
pull
requests.
Lower
number
is
better
yeah,
and
so
all
of
the
dots
that
we
want
to
focus
on
our
suddenly
grouped
in
the
bottom
left
corner.
If
you
plot
them
in
a
chart,
and
that
makes
it
hard
to
analyze,
you
can
flip
it.
B
A
E
A
A
A
A
A
It's
alright
to
me:
it's
really
no
different
than
like
in
the
in
the
risk
working
group.
I
mean
one
of
their
metrics
is
the
reporting
of
the
core
infrastructure
badge?
That's
it
I
mean
they
they're
not
reinventing
any
metric.
So
core
infrastructure
is
a
badge
that
are
pretty
exists
at
the
Linux
Foundation,
and
so
this
is
similar
to
that.
E
E
Talk
about
that
and
the
other
thing
we
can
do
is
is
actually
you
know
provide
tooling,
so
that
people
can
do
this
analysis
on
their
own
projects.
So
here
we,
you
know
where,
were
you
we're
reusing
their
metrics,
but
CN
CF
is
not
providing
the
tooling
that
you
can
point
at
your
own
repos
and
here's
anybody
what
they
do
do.
A
D
D
D
D
A
Action
items
just
to
reach
out
to
Shaun,
particularly
on
these
first
two
metrics
for
Labor
investment.
Actually,
there's
nothing
needs
to
be
done
there.
You
can
just
produce
that
spreadsheet
Andy
yeah,
but
the
second
one
is.
We
need
to
ask
if
Sean
can
actually
produce
velocity,
metrics,
a
or
D
I,
don't
think
Patricia
has
ever
done
this.
Have
they
but
kind
of
brought
these
together,
I.
C
D
So
the
the
issue
with
grim
more
lab
is
out
of
the
box.
There
is
a
separate
index
for
the
different
data
sources
and
commits
and
pull
requests
and
issues
on
different
data
sources.
So
to
have
a
visualization
like
this
yeah,
there
needs
to
be
a
new
data
form
and
alias,
or
something
that
combines
these
indexes,
which
requires
additional
setup
and
doesn't
support
it
out
of
the
box.
I
see.
A
D
A
A
A
It's
good
I
feel
happier
with
these
yeah.
Okay,
so
I
think
Andy.
You
do
have
an
action
item
which
is
to
update
the
github
repo
so
that
Kevin
can
Cole
the
well.
How
do
we
want
to
do
this?
Do
we
want
to
so
we
have
these
changes
right
now,
and
so
was
the
idea
during
this
comment
period
that
we
just
do
updates
in
the
repo
loss
and
those
are
we
reflected
in
the
website
that
was.
A
B
D
Put
it
here
because
we
have
this
section,
called
sample,
filter
and
visualization,
and
that
is
the
definition
and
then
for
sample
implementation.
That's
where
we
show
the
graph
of
what
it
actually
looks
you,
so
we
have
the
definition
first
and
then
the
implementation.
Second,
okay,
that's
my
logic.
I'm.
D
B
A
Right
so
Andy
your
your
on
that,
what's
your
action,
8!
Yes,
it
is
good
and
did
anybody
else
notice
by
the
way,
while
I
have
you
on
here
that
the
fav
icon
now
has
a
transparent
background
for
chaos?
Ok
s
that
community
I
did
not
know
this
yeah,
although
it
what's
better
yeah,
don't
use
the
one
that
John
main
yeah
I
did
I
just
pointed
him
to
that.