►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Value Working Group 10-7-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
One
issue,
but
that
metric
was
not
discussed
and
I
was
not
sure
what
it
is
so
can
you
guide
like
contributed
net
recommendability
hang.
C
On
yes,
I
think
this
is
the
where
we
have.
I
don't
know
to
look
at
my
issues.
A
C
I
think
what
I've
taken
to
do
is
I've
taken
to
just
creating
the
issue
first
and
then
the
pull
request,
because
they
sort
of
refer
to
each
other
circularly,
so
yeah.
This
can
just
wait
until
the
next
one.
A
C
C
C
C
C
We
actually
worked
on
it
in
the
in
the
working
group
and
wasn't
I
there
or
was
I
not
there?
Maybe
you
weren't.
C
One
yeah
and
I
think
yeah,
I'm
sure
I
just
created
the
issue
because
it
it
without
creating
just
because,
because
that's
circular
logic
and
that's
kind
of
like
a
pointer
for
us
to
go
back
to
and
create
the
pull
request,
but
yeah
it's
so
totally
for
the
next
release.
No
no
dispute
there.
C
B
A
C
C
B
B
C
B
Yeah
and
like
doing
work,
you
know
that
was
that
kind
of
work
which
is
so
cool.
Look
how
many
attendees
were
you
at
the
chaos
com.
B
B
A
Agenda
is
academic,
open
source
project
impact
comments
and
feedback.
I've
posted
in
the
link,
it's
issue,
149.
B
B
C
Sean
are
you
taking
a
look
at
these
two
things,
yeah
yeah,
the
I
mean
I
think
we
should
mention
site
site
you
like
is
that
james's
thing
site
as
well
as
thank
you.
D
B
C
A
So
we
have
added
as
site
as
here
we.
B
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
C
B
C
B
C
B
Yeah
no
go
back
to
the
the
actual
yeah
the
metric,
so
one
is
on
line
43.
We
have
github
insights.
A
B
B
B
B
A
A
E
I
think
last
time
I
talked
about
badges
and
then
the
acm
artifact,
oh.
C
B
B
E
I
was
just
including
for
discussion
last
time
because
it's
I
see
that
from
a
pc
perspective,
it's
a
sign
of
quality,
of
a
research
software
artifact
attached
to
a
paper,
but
then
how
that
is
measured
in
terms
of
tooling.
A
C
B
B
C
B
B
B
D
B
B
D
C
B
C
C
B
B
C
C
Yeah,
it's
a
it's
a
standard
way
of
putting
a
file
into
into
a
repo.
So
that
said,
the
site
has
software
that
james
houston,
at
texas
developed,
can
just
scan
the
repo
and
find
the
related
papers.
A
E
Because
I
was
thinking
there
are
other
like
scenario
when
I
read
your
papers,
I
I
see
different
links
like
using
it
as
another
service
to
that
highlight
or
go
to
open
source
projects.
E
Is
that
something
that
can
be
used
to
nourish
you?
A
I'll
I've
added,
I
haven't
added
it
in
the
first
one,
you
see,
the
second
one
is
verified.
The
first
one
was
not
very
funny.
Yes,
it
was
the
same
yeah.
A
B
B
A
Yeah
but
the
question
is:
is
it
a
add-on
to
the
browser
or
there.
B
And
do
we
create
an
issue
there?
We
can
just
go
off
of
the
existing
issue
and
just
tack
onto
it
and
just
say:
hey.
We
made
some
updates
based
on.
B
C
B
B
A
B
A
B
B
And
organization,
which
is
often,
which
is
often
what
I
would
just
say,
an
organization-
may
influence
the
direction
of
a
project.
I
don't
know
what.
B
An
organization
may
influence
the
direction
of
projects,
singling
some
level
of
control
within
a
community.
This
equates
to
the
level
of
influence
an
organization
has
over
the
development
trajectory
of
an
open
source
project
that
it
contributes
to
and
has
vested
interest
in.
So
that
reads
a
lot
better
and
that's
just
like.
A
Organization
can
I
add,
like
on
that,
over
the
development
of
an
open
source
project
or
community,
or
it
will
be
just
fine
without
it,
I'm
fine
with
just
this.
Okay.
B
B
This
metric
can
help
open
source
an
open
source
advocate
in
an
organization
justified
continued
funding
and
support
for
engagement.
This
metric
can
also
help
open
source,
maintainers
track
and
measure
organization.
I'm
okay,
with
that
organizational
influence
to
add
legitimacy
to
their
project
and
monitor
the
level
of
control
by
individual
by.
B
May
also
serve
as
a
signal
on
how
how
easy
or
difficult
it
may
be
for
new
members
to
contribute
to
an
open
source
project.
Okay,
so
this
is.
I
think
this
is
clearing
up
things.
Probably
that
lucas
was
bringing
some
examples
when
to
consider
when
measuring
organizational
influence.
Include
I'm
okay
with
that.
How
many
organizational
members
are
contributing
to
a
project
level
level
and
types
of
contributions
by
organizational
members,
organizations
that
are
contributing
the
change
request
at
a
high
rate
and
proportion
of
communities,
level
of
activity,
for
example,
one
standard,
dva?
B
B
A
No,
these
are
changes
like
we
have
to
use
a
single
count
of
organization
he's
proposing
making
it
a
ratio
so
number
of
contributors
from
each
organism.
B
A
A
Find
a
specific
and
the
standard
way
to
contribute,
convert
the
level
and
type
into
a
quantity.
So
so
this
is
a
level.
A
This
is
more
of
a
qualitative
origin,
judgmental
side
and
he's
asking
us
to
convert
it
into
more
quantity,
qualitative.
Quantitatively,
we
don't
really
know
how.
C
B
So
that
makes
sense,
and
I
think
I
actually
so
to
your
point
joanne.
I
think
we
have
that
covered
in
the
metric
when
we
link
out
to
the
types
of
contributions,
because
we
do
have
a
metric
called
types
of
yes
and
it
it's
pretty
open
about
what
you
just
talked
about
like
technical
or
social
contributions.
B
B
I
would
okay
so
on
all
of
those:
let's
not
do
the
raw
accounts,
but
I
think
it's
worth
pinging
lucas
in
the
issue
asking
him
why
he
thinks
raw
counts
are
better
or
rank.
I'm
sorry
ranks
are
better
rank
by
count
just
say
we
talked
about
this
today.
You
know
what
I
mean.
B
A
B
B
E
And
I'm
just
because
there
are
different
ways
to
to
fund.
I
mean
either
with
soft
or
hard
fun
strike
through
infrastructure
and
yeah.
Whatever.