►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Value.April.23.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Value.April.23.2020
A
B
A
Tag
in
here
and
how
are
you
feeling
I'll
be
awesome,
billable
zoom,
fatigue,
I'm,
not
sure
you
all
are
doing
the
state
of
I've
been
on
a
lot
of
zoom
calls.
I
was
actually
kind
of
with
that
in
mind,
hoping
to
do
more
of
a
working
session
and
talk
through
things
and
feel
like
we're
getting
some
stuff
done
as
we
were
doing
it.
B
A
I
was
thinking
we
could.
We
can
hang
out
on
here
and
be
muted.
There
is,
there
are
open
PRS
and
you
know
again
being
newer
to
the
the
crowd
here.
It
wouldn't
be
interesting
to
talk
through,
especially
your
perspective.
Matt,
on
we've
got
two
community
proposed
metrics
from
people.
I
don't
recognize
so
it's
kind
of
cool
they
been
followed
along
and
wanted
to
participate.
So
figured
it's
worth
the
review.
A
It's
like
the
last
last
to
hear
ya,
know
last.
You
know
and
once
I'm
not
sure
Kevin's
gonna
come
back
in
when
Kevin
proposed
a
question
on
PR
77.
That
left
me
thinking
of
where
the
bounds
of
metrics
versus
you
know,
methodologies
really
works
in
this
group
and
yeah
I'd
like
to
get
some
perspective
there.
Okay,.
C
A
B
A
A
B
And
Matt
I
mean
I'll
say
that
on
these
on
these
meetings
as
you're
running
them,
if
you're
I
think
we're
all
kind
of
feeling,
zoom
fatigue,
so
I
mean,
if
you
like
I,
said:
if
you
want
to
kind
of
be
creative
on
how
this
is
run,
I
mean
100
percent
fine.
So
there's
no
like
chaos
requirement
that
we
be
having
video
to.
A
A
B
I
have
I
guess:
I
do
have
one
one
thing
for
you:
it's
not
even
that
needs
to
be
resolved
today,
Matt,
but
something
perhaps
for
you
to
think
about
which
was
if
we
want
to
kind
of
systematically
approach.
Suppose
it's
it
like
opens
with
foreign
offices
to
get
a
better
handle
on.
B
B
B
So
kind
of
the
way
that
I
fun
things
is
through
grants
just
personally,
and
so
those
grants
are
kind
of
written
in
the
spirit
of
chaos
as
a
whole.
Yeah
like
because
I
can't
travel,
I
still
have
the
dollars
right
and
those
dollars
can
be
kind
of
aimed
at
ways
of
scaling
the
project
and
that
scale
can
be
at
with
particular
working
groups.
That
scale
can
be
with
software.
B
A
Dollars
cool-
that
is,
that's
actually
no
yeah,
I'll
I,
don't
have
a
strong
opinion.
I'll
think
on
that
I'll
throw
out
there
that
the
the
biggest
thing
about
value
that
we
tend
to
seem
to
be
circling
around
and
I.
Think
it'll
be
best
explored
by
example,
in
the
poorer
class
of
like
what
what
metrics
make
sense
in
this
space
and
once
I
have
a
better
pattern
of
what
ones
make
sense
and
what
needs
to
change
it
either
the
current
ones
or
future
ones.
D
A
A
You
know
copy
a
metric
and
get
going
right
like
and
and
I
don't
know
like
I've
been
looking
more
into
do
group
and
to
do
group.
Has
these
kind
of
structured
play
books,
so
I
guess
I'm
questioning
right
now
like
whether
is
my
minds
in
a
place
where,
like
am
I
adding
ironically,
am
I
adding
value
to
the
value
group
by
trying
to
pursue
metrics
or
is
my
goal
better
suited
from
like
trying
to
pare
it
or
I,
mean
mimic
or
complements
the
workroom
to
do
groove
with
their
kind
of
playbook
strong
sugar?
A
B
B
B
It
wasn't
like
to
so
I'm
kind
of
in
love
with
the
school
called
cauldron,
and
so
I
love,
I,
love
it
because
it's
it's
super
accessible,
it's
out-of-the-box,
accessible
on
the
web
and
I
mean
one
of
my
first
thoughts
is:
is
that
that
for
those
that
are
just
looking
to
even
gain
some
bearing
on
value
that
there
could
be
a
cauldron,
can
we
do
this
beard
like
a
color
and
dashboard?
That
is
that
possible
set
of
things?
Yes,.
E
We
can
create
Colton,
dashboards
and
I.
Think
Manriquez
showed
this
at
the
kiosk
on.
So
maybe
that's
where
you
got
the
idea
from
that.
You
can
build
the
dashboard,
have
all
the
visualizations
descriptions
and
everything
and
then
you
export
it
and
you
can
share
it
with
others
and
when
they
pull
in
the
data
for
their
own
projects.
They
can
load
that
dashboard
that
visualization
piece
into
their
own
cauldron,
and
that
is
a
nice
way
of
sharing
ways
to
have
metrics
and
visualizations.
A
No,
I
100%
would
want
to
be
in
a
place
where
it's
like.
Here
is
a
both
an
example
and
then
here's
the
button
to
click
to
export
the
example
and
then
yes,
you
do
need
to
set
up
your
own
version.
That's
cool,
go
click
that
button
and
then
load
it
and
get
going.
Oh
my
god,
like
a
tutorial
level
of
that,
like
I,
think
it's
a
wonderful
goal
to
set
it.
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah.
This
is
kind
of
like
the
vision
I
felt
like
I
needed.
You
know
when
you
get
a
little
too
deep
it
and
github
issues
and
kind
of
lose
the
forest.
If
you
are
yeah
that
would
be.
That
would
be
great.
Please
wait,
okay,
so
getting
back
into
the
forest,
we
have
some.
You
know
something
we're
celebrating.
You
know
when
I
joined
value
group
a
month
ago,
the
zero
issue,
zero
for
requests,
very,
very,
very
quiet.
A
We
have
four
and
four,
which
means
there's
stuff
in
progress,
which
means
yeah
thanks
everybody
actually
in
huge.
Thank
you
to
your
you've,
been
very,
very
thoughtful
and
taking
time
on
comments
and
suggestions
which
I
appreciate,
but
a
little
slow
reviewing.
You
know,
I
think
I'm,
trying
to
hold
a
lot
of
space
for
everybody
right
now,
like
it's
been
a
pretty
wild
month
in
the
world.
E
A
A
You
know
the
the
very
short
version
of
the
social
currency
metric
metric
system
in
my
head.
You
know
I'm
working
under
the
premise
it
needs
to
go
back
in
because
it
was
already
approved,
and
that's
great
for
me,
like
from
an
industry
standpoint,
it's
social
listening,
which
is
a
very
common
practice
in
organizations
of
usually
a
larger
size.
What
I?
What
I
think
it
adds
on
top
is
a
also
like
a
a
methodology
to
to
analyzing
to
self
analysis
and
improvement
based
on
the
data.
A
So
that's
really
fascinating,
but
this
one
also
I'll
be
honest
to
say
it
confused
me
a
bit
just
because
it's
so
it's
such
a
expert-level
tutorial
on
how
to
do
something,
as
opposed
to
just
like
a
simple
raw
metric.
If
you
will
so
yeah,
not
a
bad
or
good
thing,
just
like
for
me
as
like
as
I'm,
trying
to
pattern,
match
and
learn
how
we
do
things
of
chaos,
it
definitely
stood
out
as
like.
This
is
deep.
What
are
you
gonna
happen?
A
E
E
I
want
to
reveal
who
I
talk
to,
but
the
they
are
the
largest
user
of
that
software,
and
it's
one
that
the
software
is
WordPress
and
they
just
want
to
know
what
is
the
WordPress
community
thinking
about
us
as
a
company
for
many
reasons,
and
one
of
them
is
the
technical
people
who
are
involved
in
the
projects
are
not
the
ones
who
would
be
our
customers,
but
they
are
consulting.
They
are
being
asked
by
their
friends
by
their
family
by
their
peers.
Where
should
we
go
to
have
the
WordPress
website?
E
And
that
was
a
very
powerful
story
that
I
heard
for
how
they
want
to
use
social
currency
metric
system
and
how
that
could
be
applied
and
the
value
to
tie
that
back
into
the
value
component
is
it
closes
a
gap
between
saying
we
need
to
grow
our
technology
branch
to
vert
driving
sales
in
our
product
team
and
being
able
to
having
social
currency
metric
system
can
bridge
that
gap
a
little
bit
more
than
right.
Now,
it's
little
disjointed.
That
story.
A
B
I
do
so
so
Matt.
You
had
pointed
out
the
complexity,
so
two
things
one
Garrett.
Thank
you
for
that
and
that's
nice
to
hear
that
people
have
an
interest
in
this.
One
of
the
things
that
we're
trying
to
constantly
balance
in
the
chaos
project
is
an
overwhelming.
This
is
printed
in
a
metric
and
just
the
metric
trying
to
get
it
to
point
across
as
simply
as
possible.
So
there
I
hear
fairly
regularly
and
I've
been
probably
guessing.
B
Georg
has
heard
this
too,
that
I
go
when
I
take
a
look
at
the
metrics,
whatever
those
might
be
and
they're
very
difficult
to
understand,
I
think
they're
long
and
it's
a
commitment
to
read
the
metric
index.
It's
like
an
academic
paper,
sometimes,
and
so
over
the
years.
We
have
actually
worked
to
scale
that
back
to
make
the
metrics
more
accessible
to
quickly
get
your
head
around.
What
the
metric
is
without
full
descriptions
of
how
to
deploy
the
metric
I
mean
for
a
while.
B
A
Schema
all
of
that,
it's
funny.
You
mention
that,
because
my
first
attempted
PR
two-bit,
chair,
gym,
like
2015,
was
all
the
sequel.
Syntax
I
was
using
to
try
to
query
information
out
of
it
because
I'm,
like
you,
have
a
great
tool,
that's
completely
useless
to
peers
of
mine
because
you've
not
telling
people
how
to
use
it.
The
link,
but
that's
exceptionally
tricky
in
this
situation
because
we're
like
yeah,
it's
not
clear
to
me,
like
the
sort
of
you,
know,
content
hierarchy
of
like
raw
pieces
versus
aggregated
pieces.
A
That's
valuable
so
like
these
headers
are
like,
hopefully,
very
short
and
concrete
and
speak
to
an
audience
from
the
beginning,
like
social
listening
plus
this
thing
in
the
implementation,
it
requires
the
collection
of
community
comments,
the
definition
of
codecs,
an
ongoing
review
and
I
checked
this
with
some
friends
that
might
actually
implement
it
in
Deverell
space
and
they're,
like
yeah
I,
know
what
you're
saying
there
so
like
it
hit
the
minimum
yeah
like
legibility,
but
yeah.
This
thing
is
so
beastly,
so
I
guess,
I
didn't
know.
I
would
probably
can.
A
Looks
like
a
this
is
a
Google
Docs
using
studio
according
to
our
Merck
and
then
the
bottom
one.
This
is
a
err
table,
but
they
linked
to
at
the
bottom.
So
that's
kind
of
nice.
Okay,.
E
Correct
this,
or
the
rationale
is
that
you
can
build
out
a
social
currency,
metric
system
with
any
tool
you
like,
but
you
need
to
get
the
data
and
grimmer
lab
already
solves
getting
the
data
from
30
different
data
sources
and
what
the
school
some
of
code
project
is
is
to
pull.
The
data
from
the
database
have
a
the
UI.
Basically,
this
air
table
visualization
that
is
number
two
for
the
tagging
and
then
also
the
reporting,
so
that
is
building
on
top
of
groom
or
lab
to
have
the
social
currency
metric
system.
E
E
B
I
started
to
have
it's
not
that
I
didn't
have
an
interest,
but
part
of
what
I'm
always
trying
to
do
on
any
of
these
metrics
is
have
them
connected
to
to
something
right.
Does
that
be
like
Daniel,
oh
yeah,
it
comes
out
of
chaos,
and
it's
not
perfect
yet,
but
we're
getting
there.
So
my
my
recommendation
for
this
metric
would
probably
be
revise
and
resubmit
to
reduce
the
amount
of
description
that
would
be
my
right,
I
agree.
E
With
the
revise
and
resubmit
can
would
it
be
okay
to
delay
this
until,
after
or
during
google
Summer
of
Code
to
make
that
part
of
the
project,
because
we
will
need
documentation
of
how
to
use
the
tool
that
you're
building
and
so
a
lot
of
the
detail
that
is
in
here
right
now?
Can
move
over
now
see
like
to
keep
it
here?
Central,
because
that
is
what
the
google
Summer
of
Code
student
saw
and
will
be
using
as
the
baseline
for
the
project.
Folder.
E
A
I
just
want
to
make
sure
so
the
currency
is
like
it's
in
an
archive
folder
with
with
a
header
that
says.
Basically,
this
is
not
a
metric
that
makes
sense
to
value
what
this
PR
does
is.
Brings
it
back
out
of
the
archive
with
a
little
bit
more
context,
so
I'm
wondering
if
ya
I'm,
fine,
either
way
I
just
want
to
make
sure
like.
A
Is
it
helpful
to
pull
it
out
of
that
archives
context
into
like
still
overly
elaborate,
but
a
metric
in
the
folder
and
then
we'll
take
the
next
step
after
that
it
through
another
issue,
because
I'm
thinking
like
open
a
new
issue
to
simplify
SCMS,
merge
this
PR,
and
then
we
can
take
that
step
further.
When
we've
got
the
google
Summer
of
Code
person.
E
A
A
A
B
A
A
even
put
a
note-
that's
you
know
pretty
respectfully
but
bluntly
says
like
this:
isn't
practical
as
written,
because
it's
more
tutorial
and
okay,
then
like
a
clear
metric
and
like
based
on
what
we've
all
talked
about
like
it
seems
more
appropriate
to
say,
like
this
is
a
valued
metric
and
to
put
it
in
the
in
the
top-level
folder
here
Institute
project
popularity.
So.
C
A
Sorry,
this
top
header
just
the
whole
thing
yeah
this
thing,
so
the
anything
that
looks
really
long
like
that's
from
here
and
I
just
copied.
It
word
for
word
over
and
in
fact,
some
clarification.
B
A
C
D
A
I
remove
the
archive
the
red
section
and
in
green
kind
of
instead
of
the
description
being
this
kind
of
very
heady,
very
smart
introduction
to
this.
That's
I
try
to
give
it
just
like
a
bit
more
of
a
Alain
I,
see
yeah
I,
see
and
then
like.
Similarly
like,
this
is
condensed.
So
this
is
all
original
stuff
an
objective
and
then
the
other
green
edition
that
CMS,
you
know
requires
like
clarifying
like
what
does
it
actually
require
to
do
this
in
the
implementation?
D
Like
I
also
this
written
in
the
age,
gender
section
of
focus
area,
because
previously
we
had
a
different
focus
area
that
was
released
under
that
area.
Now
it's
archived
and
needs
a
reframing
or
reshaping,
but
I'm
still
stuck
like
what
directions
we
are
taking.
We
have
the
goal,
but
we
don't
have
the
focus
video
here
if
I
proposed
two
or
three
metrics,
where
should
I
put
them
or
categorize
them
or
all
will
be
just
a
list
of
metrics
and
the
value
crew.
A
E
Speak
to
the
history,
if
you
like
sure
yeah
yeah,
so
focus
areas
are
an
invention.
We
came
up
with
in
the
diversity
and
inclusion
working
group
and,
as
we
were
working
through
diversity,
inclusion
issues,
Emma
Ervin
brought
in
the
findings
from
a
research
she
did
with
Mozilla
on
what
does
it
take
to
have
inclusive
projects
and
she
had
five
or
seven
areas
like
leadership
events,
governance,
all
these
areas
and
those
were
focused
areas
which
we
then
developed,
metrics
for
so
diversity.
E
A
B
D
D
A
A
Justice,
it's
a
really
good,
read
but
in
a
nutshell,
it's
kind
of
a
false
dichotomy
to
say
that
a
metric
is
either
valuable
to
a
community
or
to
an
individual,
similarly
to
an
individual
to
a
company,
and
we
could
offer
some
sort
of
matrix
like
a
self-assessment
matrix
like
she's,
proposing
which
I'm
open
to.
But
for
me
it's
I'm,
sila
I'm,
fully
down
for
that
classification
and
I'm
welcome
an
issue
exploring.
A
A
I,
at
the
same
time,
I
really
respect
what
you're
saying
that,
like
it's
important
to
understand
an
audience
and
to
help
our
audience
understand
when
a
metric
is
useful
but
I
yeah,
and
if
you
it's
also
something
I,
think
we're
gonna.
Take
some
some
tries
at
focus
areas
through
a
conversation
and
realize
you
know
what
that
doesn't
actually
work.
That's
okay,
too
I
would
ask
that
you
kind
of
open
that
issue
start
a
start,
a
new
thread
on
that
conversation.
A
If
you
have
an
idea
so
and
then
the
rest
of
our
energy
should
be
like,
let's
get
the
stuff
that
works
and
get
it
in
there
cool
thanks
already
good
I
think
we
hit
a
decent
place
on
how
long
I'm
gonna
keep
closing
and
reopening
the
exact
same
PRS.
Is
that
sufficient
not
symmetrical
value?
I?
A
C
My
opening
I
think
of
the
folks
to
area
in
divide
you,
it's
okay,
I,
think
and
I
think
organize
the
organization
become
separated,
tu-tu-tu-tu-tu
area.
Why
is
the
for
example,
in
the
foundation,
this
foundation,
Apache
foundation
and
the
other
is
a
secretive
company?
The
how
different
goes?
The
company
is
the
much
more
to
once
the
wing
in
the
commercial
commercial.
We
want
to
get
more
money
and
the
foundation
yeah
as
traditionally
they
want
to
through
their
produces.
C
A
D
A
C
A
Good
point
that
I
I
think
yeah
I
mean
and
even
different
companies
will
have
both
ends
ultimately
like
trying
to
get
more
visibility
versus
trying
to
get
more
money
out
of
a
community
effort
like
this
is
where
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
entire
selves
in
very
useful
nots.
But
what's
the
conversations
need
to
happen
so
thanks
thanks
suggesting
that
cool
so
just
to
wrap
this
up.
This
is
good
stuff
words
on
archive
the
metric,
a
little
nice
simplification,
there's
no
salsa
forward
and
forward,
and.
A
Yeah
no
rest
foot
I
asked
you
to
review
when
you
get
a
chance,
all
right,
cool
move
in
a
long.
That's
the
other
metric
that
was
proposed.
This
was
one
I
wrote
out
again
before
it
was
committed,
so
it
needs
some
need.
Some
cleaning
up
that
Gehrig
added
a
bunch
of
comments
for
me
to
to
clean
up,
but
so
the
the
premise
is
share.
Voice
which
will
adore
not
is
a
very
common
way.
Companies
kind
of
talk
about
a
measurable
comparison
of
impact
from
their
organization
versus
another.
A
In
and
I
could
probably
I
can
do
some
work
to
clarify
the
description
that
it's
not
just
like
a
big
comparison,
but
it
is
ultimately
like
the
most
common
practice
I've
seen
there
are
companies
like
buzzsumo
fixate
sprinkler
they
all
have
paid
for
products
for
sharing
voice,
with
the
idea
that
you
know
you
have
some
measurable
amount
of
audience
on
the
social
platforms
that
they
measure
and,
and
they
can
say,
like
you,
have
this
much
of
the
share
voice
around
say.
Big
data
was
a
big
one
when
I
was
actually
using
this.
A
A
A
That's
not
too
close
to
home
like
so.
What's
the
share
of
voice
around
the
next
package
managers
like
is,
it
is
flat-pack
trending
as
the
top
one
or
is
snack
and
canonic
attending
versus
others,
and
you
could
measure
each
of
them
across
a
standard
set
of
conversation
on
different
social
platforms
and
use
google
search
traffic
to
grab
the
amount
of
conversations
happening
through
other
sorts
of
posts
and
then
avoid
the
wastes.
B
A
B
A
It's
being
it's
being
talked
about
more
exactly
based
on
whatever,
so
you
do
need
a
baseline.
So
it's
like
before
interacting
like
before
trying
to
do
something
effective
measure
like
how
much
share
a
voice
is
like.
It
feels
repetitive,
to
define
things
with
the
turn,
but
like
what
is
your
share
of
voice
relative
to
your
top
three
or
four
competitors?
Okay,.
E
A
A
B
A
B
A
E
Go
ahead,
I
mean
you
asked
about
sharing.
What
were
you
thinking
that
well.
B
Sharing
means
like,
if
there's
the
five
of
us
on
here,
we
all
collectively
create
a
unified
voice
like
there's
a
there's.
A
chaos
for
I
would
say,
produces
a
shared
in
the
collaborative
sense,
a
shared
voice
that
what
comes
out
of
chaos
is
a
collection
of
what
Matt
B
has
to
say
what
'banahna
has
to
say
what
you
have
to
say
what
King
has
to
say,
and
it's
we're
all
in
this.
E
A
I,
take
your
feedback
there
like
be.
You
know,
label
your
image,
so
label
the
image
so
that
people
can
follow.
The
example
is
a
is
a
good
tip
in
your
life
music.
But
to
answer
your
question,
you
know
it's
a
I
mean
for
one.
It's
a
complete
metric
like
this
is
this
is
an
idea
that
I
don't
know
why
it
was
merged
in
its
current
format.
It's
it
needs
more
work.
A
Well,
like
that,
aside,
like
how
we're
to
share
voice
so
sure
a
voice
reminds
me
more
of
like
SCMS,
which
it's
like
it's
a
methodology
to
using
the
raw
metric,
the
raw
metric
being
like,
like,
like
the
monotonic,
like
how
many,
how
many
times
have
you
been
talked
about
this
month.
That's
just
like
that.
Growing
number,
ok
cool,
that
on
its
own
is
valueless,
but
if
I
find
something
about
you
to
compare
it
to,
which
is
this
competitive
angle,
now,
I
have
something
that
a
company
would
pay
me
to
do.
A
So
kind
of
two
separate
things
one
length
this
needs
completion,
but
that
said,
there
is
the
raw
part
of
this
that's
good
and
it
does
bring
up
the
question
of
like
the
share
voice.
Idea
is
kind
of
layered
on
top
of
popularity
or
it
could
be
considered
to
be,
but
it
is
its
kind
of
own
distinct
way
of
conceptualizing
value
and.
C
A
B
A
Because
this-
and
it
would
be
something
we're
like
you
kind
of
have
to
know
like
who
are
what
are
other
standards
that
are
trying
to
define
metrics
so
like
it
immediately
gives
you
that
mindset
of
like
understanding
your
your
target
market
yeah.
That's
that's
what
I
like
about
it,
but
you
know
to
know
this
point.
It's
it's
not
itself
a
raw
metric.
It's
a
synthetic
comparative.
B
And
I
think
it
would
also
be
useful,
like
in
your
example,
mat
of
well.
If
we
talk
about
like
say,
package
managers,
yeah
I'm,
an
organization
looking
at
using
different
package
managers
that
I
if
I
was
using
package
manager
a
and
they
were
54%
and
over
time,
they're
dipping
down
to
17%
and
I
would
tell
me.
I,
probably
want
to
look
under
the
hood
a
little
bit
more
as
to
have
have
companies
left
yeah
contributions
to
that
one.
A
have
companies
entered
into
the
market
say
I'm.
B
B
E
What
you're
describing
that
to
me?
It's
like
how
we
would
use
the
metric.
It's
not!
It
doesn't
sound
like
it's
a
Christian
of
the
metric
itself,
but
to
have
a
more
holistic
view
and
construct
a
story
around
what
the
metric
is
telling
us
and
pulling
in
additional
data
points
to
have
a
complete
picture.
Yeah.
B
B
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
E
E
Kevin
is
saying
the
metric
is
number
of
Commons
right
and
then
you
fill
to
the
base
or
or
you
categorize
them
based
on
who
owns
that
comment
or
who
was
in
that
comment,
and
then
sheriff
voice
is
just
the
visualization
on
top
of
that
raw
number
metric,
where
you
then
have
the
percentages,
and
so
this
is
something
we
have
talked
about
in
chaos
for
a
long
time,
and
we
don't
have
a
really
good
solution
about
what
women
do.
We
call
it
a
metric.
When
do
we
call
it
a
filter?
E
A
Yeah
yeah,
okay,
that
makes
sense
in
context
and
and
I
totally
respect
it.
It's
it's
a
question.
I
have
myself
kind
of
regularly
like
I,
like
my
again
gleaning
by
example,
it's
like
it
seems,
okay
to
have
composite
and
raw
metrics
side
by
side
and
in
the
work
I
would
love
more,
maybe
like
a
touch
of
metadata
there.
That
makes
it
clear
like
this
is
something
you
measure
and
doesn't
doesn't
have
an
opinion.
A
Yet
this
other
ways
an
opinionated
view
that
we
consider
a
composite
metric
like
that
differentiation
or
that
distinction
is
something
I
have
to
do
in
my
job.
So
any
guidance
is
very
helpful.
Cool,
sorry,
I
didn't
gather
a
little
bit
and
hopefully
people
can
hang
out
for
a
minute.
What
did
you
want
to
ask
Matt?
Well.
B
Yeah,
it's
I,
I,
don't
think
it's
gotten
in
the
way
of
releasing
metrics
and
providing
value
like
whether
we
only
do
atomic
or
only
do
composite
so
and
in
fact,
I
think
certain
working
groups
are
a
little
bit
more
inclined
towards
atomic
metrics
or
these
raw
metrics
and
certain
working
groups
may
be
inclined
to
more
composite
metrics,
so
I
I,
don't
know
that
it
much
difference
to
me
personally
so
and
then
I
guess.
My
last
question
was
just
as
we
have
the
release:
I'm,
sorry,
which
we've
talked
about
this
before.
D
B
That's
not
next
week
or
in
two
weeks,
but
you
know
the
the
release
like
on
the
webpage.
We
have
those
five
metrics
that
are
under
value
I'm
talking
about.
Is
it
hey,
Sean,
hi
Carter
we're
just
wrapping
up
the
value
working
group
here
for
a
second
so
give
us
just
a
second:
do
we
have
a
plan
on
removing
those.