►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Value Working Group 7-15-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
everyone
so
welcome
to
the
cures
value
working
group
meeting
of
july
15.,
so
we
have
a
team
light
agenda
today.
A
One
is
like
we
have
released
two
metrics
one
is
impact
of
a
catholic
researcher
metric
and
the
other
one
is
organizational
influence,
so
just
need
a
review
or
anything
on
that
and
the
current
one
we
are
proposing
the
researcher
reputation
metric
and
the
fair
matrix
which
we've
drawn
you
know.
Math
was
a
sign
on
the
fair
metric
for
the
to
do
some
work.
B
A
A
B
I
I
think
the
chain
for
both
of
these
came
out
of
me
introducing
the
group
to
this
this
native
letter.
D
So
it
doesn't
really
have
an
owner
per
se.
Right
now,
matt
may
have
gotten
them
started
in
a
meeting.
B
Okay,
if
I
put
this
out
there
but
beyond
that,
I
don't
know.
A
C
A
And
how
reputable
or
in
influential
researcher
is
in
this
in
the
open
source
domain.
B
B
A
B
C
Stephen,
are
they
mostly
ways
to.
A
B
B
B
B
D
C
I
especially
like
the
bullet
point
on
the
very
first
one,
the
10,
simple
rules
for
documenting
scientific
software.
I
really
like
the
one
that
rule
10
tell
people
how
to
cite
your
software,
because
I
believe
that
that
was
like
a
big
deal
is
how
many
times
your
software
was
cited
right.
B
B
B
B
B
Like
onto
soft
as
geosciences
stuff
to
start
with,
but
they
may
help-
and
I
don't
know
when
we're
building
a
metric,
how
much
of
a
gigantic
laundry
list
of
things
to
check
for
when
you
put
into
something
I
mean
since
it's
all
automated.
I
guess
we
can
tell
it
to
go.
Look
for
everything,
but
I
don't
know
right
in
building
something
that's
workable
versus
something
that
just
gets
too
clogged
looking,
but
to
be.