►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Value.April.27.2019
Description
CHAOSS.Value.April.27.2019
A
A
B
B
C
B
A
B
A
C
A
So
this
was
so
what
we
did
last
week
was
we
spent.
We
just
spent
time
figuring
out
what
you
know.
What
is
the
format
of
our
tracker?
You
know
what
do
we?
How
do
we
want
to
prioritize,
and
you
know
how
do
we
want
to
identify
these
opportunities
mission
accomplished
so
I
think
we've
got
a
nice
layout,
and
so
now
we
just
need
to
use
it,
and
you
know
so
what
we
want
to
do
periodically
is:
do
some
brainstorming
put
items
that
may
potentially
be
of
interest
onto
this
list
and
I
think
weekly.
A
A
C
You're
talking
I,
don't
remember,
I,
remember
they
both
trying
to
fit
I
want
to
say
the
wall
of
the
hall
is
farther
away.
Mm-Hmm
yeah
we
have
to
do
it
Jen
directly
dimension
on
the
advance
grant,
which
is
it's
not
hard
to
do
that
authentically
at
all
and
I.
Think
with
that
deadline,
that's
you
know,
I,
don't
know
who
can
do
that
I?
Certainly
yeah
I
certainly
can't
read
that
one
mm-hmm
in
that
timeframe,
my
semester
isn't
over.
Yet
it's
actually
the
worst
time
of
my
semester.
A
C
C
Obviously,
then,
our
universities
and
our
position
to
do
that.
We
can
include
in
the
budget
work
for
people
who
are
not
at
universities,
usually
that's
budget
in
the
form
of
a
subcontract.
If
there
are
other
opportunities
that
are
not
NSF,
then
maybe
so
those
are
the
things
that
net
hire
less
that's
less
of
what
we
do,
but.
C
Yeah
I
mean
that's
great,
we're
definitely
already
doing
that,
but
if
there's
a
think
it
might
be
also
there's
an
opportunity
in
the
Linux
Foundation.
Maybe
gear
can
elaborate
on
more
with
regards
to
their
community
organizations.
I
know
diversity.
Inclusion
is
pursuing
a
what's.
It
called
again
here.
B
So
we
have
the
links
foundational
community
bridge,
which
is
a
platform
for
Risley
crowdfunding,
open
source
work
and
a
way
to
manage
money
within
communities
in
a
transparent
ledger.
The
community
bridge
also
has
two
additional
modules:
one
is
mentoring
and
the
other
one
is
secure.
Teen
software
right
any
source
code
and
stuff.
C
A
F
A
One
idea
might
be
we.
You
know
we
periodically.
You
have
got
a
brainstorming
session
where
people
are
injured.
Who
are
interested
in
this.
You
know
just
get
get
together,
spend
an
hour.
Do
a
bunch
of
google
searching,
you
know,
put
opportunities
on
the
list.
Maybe
that's
one
mechanism,
maybe
another
mechanism
would
be
one
person.
Is
you
know
our
grant
guru
and
that
person
just
takes
charge
and
is
responsible
for
kind
of
putting
you
know,
deal
flow
onto
the
spreadsheet,
maybe.
A
E
Sure
so
I
think
grants
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
I've
been
thinking
about
on
this
is
there's
there's
kind
of
grants
that
are
research,
oriented
right
and
they're
there
they're.
Typically,
what's
that
that's
gone
again,
except
ours,
yeah,
so
they're
they're,
really
about
driving
understanding
about
a
particular
area
of
interest,
so
we're
kind
of
like
grants
about
something
there
are
also
grants
that
are
for
something
so
for
or
scaling
or
or
supporting
a
particular
initiative
and
they're
kind
of
two
different
things,
so
I
think
as
part
of
this
process.
E
C
D
Do
you
know
of
any
company,
sir
I
know
if
you're
from
Comcast
cable
and
they
have
an
Innovation
Fund,
which
they
they
grant
money
to
to
research
projects,
community
initiatives
that
are
in
line
with
their
goals
and
so
on.
Yeah.
E
D
I
think
my
point
is
that
a
good
thing
could
make
be
maybe
to
talk
to
the
open
source
officers
at
via
to
do
group
and
see
what
kind
of
grants
that
the
companies
could
could
give
yeah,
because
I
mean
this
business
metrics
and
measuring
the
contributions
from
a
business
perspective
is
a
very
hot
topic
and
top
priority
for
a
recognized
challenge
for
a
lot
of
companies.
So
I
think.
If
you
talk
to
the
right
people
and
yeah,
it
should
be
opportunity
there.
Yep
I,
agree
with
that.
It
seems.
E
B
A
E
Yeah,
just
to
be
four
I
mean
we're
we're
always
kind
of
pursuing
the
academic
funding
from
an
academic
side.
That's
just
kind
of
an
ongoing
thing:
the
grants
in
an
academic
side.
They
do
take
awhile
to
assemble
and
scale
up
to
even
remotely
be
competitive.
So
they're,
not
just
like
an
afternoon
of
putting
together
I
mean
they
take
I,
mean
upwards
of
a
month,
sometimes
to
assemble,
and
they
take
very
large
teams
to
assemble
as
well
so
versus
I.
Think
sometimes
the.
E
Looking
to
scale
a
particular
project,
they're,
usually
a
little
bit
smaller
and
a
little
bit
more
palatable
to
put
together
from
my
experience,
so
it
my
take
would
be.
Is
the
the
the
grants
or
support
that
would
come
from
say?
Organizations
or
corporations
might
be
something
that
could
be
a
little
bit
faster
to
assemble.
E
E
And
then
I
think
the
other
kind
of
just
from
my
own
personal
perspective,
running
one
NSF
grant
is
a
ton
of
work.
It
just
is
and
so
like
running
to
in
a
very
optimistic
way,
I
mean
when
the
funding
rates
are
three
or
four
percent
to
say
that
I
would
actually
have
to.
This
is
not
not
high
on
the
likelyhood
scale,
but
I
don't
know
that
that
would
be
something
that
I
could
even
do.
It
would
be
close.
C
A
A
E
A
A
Sorry
last
week
we
said
that,
yes,
we
do
want
to
create
a
reference
implementation
for
the
value
working
group
we'd
like
that
to
be
sort
of
our
own
instance
so
that
we
can
innovate,
and
you
know
we
can
make
changes
so
I
think
it
maybe
this
week
we
can
talk
about
what
might
that
look
like?
How
would
it
be
hosted,
what
suffer
would
be
would
be
used
and
what
types
of
contributions
do
we
need
to
get
that
started?
I.
C
So
it's
just
a
summary
of
some
repos,
forgive
the
shorthand
for
where
they
exist,
but
basically
by
repo
and
by
language.
We
have
lines
of
code
that
exist
and
average
complexity,
so
those
numbers
can
be
used
to
derive,
and
this
is
using
the
SDC
package
in
concert
with
otter
this
this
can
be
direct
numbers
can
be
derived
in
a
parameterised
ways
that
people
want
to
calculate
value
from
them.
That's
that's
something
that
that
will
make
possible
and
that
metric
that
metric
will
be
deployed.
C
An
augur,
might
guess
it
in
our
next
next
release
and
we
are
starting
and
that's.
We
do
two-week
sprints
and
our
next
sprint
starts
today.
So
you
know
by
repo,
so
you
know
look
at
just
bring
something
up
here,
see
the
a
No
so
kind
of
the
way
that
gets
presented
is
this
way
where
you
have
a
group
of
projects
that
you
can
sort
in
different
ways.
There
are
300
some
projects
in
here
with
1,600
repos
and
if
you
click
on
any
one
repo
you'll
get
the
stats
about
that
repo.
C
C
A
C
Yeah,
it's
beautiful
and
that,
but
then
I
guess.
My
point
is
because
I
wanted
to
show
that
so
that
you
can
see
that
the
tooling
that
we
proposed
for
these
metrics,
which
are
looking
at
lines
of
code
complexity
and
providing
potential
value
calculations
that
those
will
be
also
in
that
same
kind
of
user
interface
as
well
as
exposed
through
an
API.
So
if
you
want
to
build
your
own.
F
A
A
C
I
mean
I
hope
so,
when
I
host,
like
the
68-hundred
repo
set,
that
I
demonstrated
there,
that
is
hosted,
data
and
otter
are
hosted.
A
pretty
big
box.
I've
got
I,
think
a
total
of
18
cores
and
128
gigs
of
RAM,
oh
and
solid-state
drives.
But
that's
because
6800
repos
equals
a
lot
of
data,
and
if,
if
you
want
that
to
perform
well
off
of
the
base
data,
then
that's
what
you
do
in
the
long
run.
C
A
A
C
We
do
it
like.
Yes,
some
of
our
projects
had
like
10
repos
it
like
you
did.
We
do
over
maybe
two
collections
or
four
collections
of
repositories,
with
a
total
of
like
40
repositories
between
them
and
we
had
frankly,
that's
not
that
that's
a
good
useful
case
for
most
Community,
Managers
and
I.
Don't
know
that
we
have
any
value
and
doing
60
and
repos
is
a
working.
Your
prototype,
no.
C
C
And
I
have
a
bunch
of
I'm
a
bunch
already
up
in
docker
containers
for
different
purposes,
so
I
mean
if
we
want
to
pick
a
set
of
repos
that
we
use
as
examples
or
just
I
mean
we.
Can
you
pick
any
repos
I've
got
a
bunch,
then
we
could
do
that
or
we
or
we
you
know.
So
we
can
just
take
a
sample
or
repos
that
I
start
with
and
do
that
or
we
give
you
something
else.
A
B
C
A
C
Had
like
an
internal
board
that
includes
all
my
people's
information,
I
have
I,
would
I
owe
the
world
and
I
will
before
this
next
I
mean
I
have
to
have
that
out
for
google
Summer
of
Code
for
for
a
whole
lot
of
reasons.
I
need
to
put
that
road
map
out
of
my
head.
What
the
white
boards
and
into
discussions
so
I'm
gonna
focus
just
a
focus.
There's
really
two
tracks
to
the
roadmap.
The
first
track
is
features
like
value
metrics.
The
second
track
is
I.
C
Think
I
mentioned
before
we're
consolidating
all
of
the
sources
of
data
into
a
single
database,
which
makes
cross
cross
collection
analysis
easier.
So,
for
example,
we
can
look
at
total
lines
of
code
at
a
moment
in
time
compared
to
commits
over
period
of
time
from
the
git
repos.
So
there's
a
bunch
of
information,
that's
currently
in
different
physical,
but
different
different
databases
that
would
be
consolidated
into
one
and
make
the
generation
of
metrics
that
link
those
together
mm-hmm.
C
Query
if
the
number
of
repositories
is
large
enough,
that
those
are
the
cases
where
we
go
to
a
data
Mart
style,
especially
for
summary
statistics,
where
that's
just
essentially
a
process
that
runs
over
the
full
collection
of
commits,
for
example,
and
and
gives
you.
Statistics
I'm
surprised
by
project
by
weaker,
weekly,
monthly
and
annually
are
kind
of
the
aggregations
in
this
in
the
data
itself,
and
we
offer
restful
api
for
all
the
metrics
as
well.
So
if
you
don't
like
our
front-end,
you
don't
have
to
live
with
it.
C
The
current
world
they're
just
other
tables
inside
the
same,
my
sequel
database,
I'm
giving
you
know
heaven
for
now.
I
think
they'll
likely
be
different
tables
inside
of
the
Postgres
database.
It
that
summarized
things
it
over
a
long
haul.
One
could
argue.
There's
you
know
if
we
put
those
in
a
separate
database
and
try
to
drive
all
of
the
front-end
statistics,
instead
of
them
data
off
of
summarize
data,
their
performance
values.
To
that
the
loot,
we
have
to
weigh
those
choices
against
requests.
C
A
C
Yeah
for
stuff
that
we
would
collect
daily,
yes,
and
that
would
be
your
get.
Repo
information
is
collected
and
updated
daily
I
think
there
are
other
things
that
we
don't
collect
regularly
like
code
like
lion,
counting
the
rate
of
change
in
the
number
of
lines
of
code
or
complexity
in
a
project
is
relatively
low
right.
Oh
so
we
don't.
We
don't
generate
that
in
the
summary
form
right
now.
Well,
we
don't
have
it
on
the
front
end.
Yet
so
it's
it's
not
a
problem.
C
A
C
C
B
A
C
Our
readme,
a
readme
file
kind
of
gives
an
overview
of
how
to
start,
including
we
do.
You
have
a
vagrant
machine
that
there
was
a
this
memory
care
that
there
was
a
relief
of
VirtualBox
in
the
last
two
weeks
that
broke
vagrant
and
said
I.
Think
the
vagrant
fix
has
been
put
out
there
by
the
vagrant
community
now,
but
it
was.
C
A
C
Sources
less
facade
so
which
is
coming
up
worker
inside
a
modern,
be
just
abused
beside
to
go,
collect
the
fine-grained
git
repo
data.
We
also
have
right
now
this
v8
Torrance
back
in
the
latest
release
that
gives
us
I,
don't
try
to
say,
gives
us
that
data
a
lot
of
what
we
built
initially.
It
was
obviously
mark
because
it's
readily
available
and
a
lot
of
people
to
compare
and
repo
they
can
think
of.
C
A
A
C
Mean
there's
there
are,
and
we've
had,
we've
had
a
couple
of
students
to
the
google
Summer
of
Code
make
like
pretty
good
contributions,
which
you
know
makes
me
happy
because
I
don't
think.
A
year
ago
our
new
our
new
comer
experience
was
at
the
point
where
students
were
able
to
easily
figure
it
out
and
make
a
contribution.
But
now
it
is
so
that's
it's
good
news.
We've
progressed
in
some
meaningful
way,
I'll
just
throw
a
link
to
our
github
repo,
which
is
under
the
chaos
organization
in
there,
and
we
now
have
DCO
turned
on
georg.
B
C
Think
the
way
that
I
imagine
it
working
is
that
some
of
the
things
that
are
going
to
happen
for
value
I'm,
probably
going
to
do
out-of-band
at
a
different
branch.
Just
so
I
can
put
them
up
faster,
I.
Think
anyone
who
wants
to
contribute
the
value
metric
to
augur.
If
you
just
follow
the
regular
instructions
and
we
can
merge
those
pull
requests
into
whatever
branch
we
work
off
of
I
could
keep
and
I
guess
I'm
a
little
bit
reluctant
to
keep
it
on
master,
just
because
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
don't
mess
with.
C
So
this
I
guess
that
lets
us
get
value
metrics
out
in
front
of
the
value
you're
faster
than
if
we
rely
on
all
the
things
happen
inside
ordinary
spread,
because
those
ordinary
sprints
are
gonna.
You
know,
they'll
include
some
value
metrics,
but
they'll
include
other
things
and
there
may
be.
There
may
be
things
that
people
who
are
contributing
to
this
group
are
really
principally
interested
in
sitting
for
this
group
that
eventually
they'll
eventually
make
it
into
a
release
on
the
master
branch.
But
we
don't
have
I,
guess
I'm
not
trying
to
get
through.
C
C
It
just
need
to
be
put
into
auger,
which
I'll
probably
do
myself
and
then
have
the
front,
and
maybe
have
a
google
Summer
of
Code
student
dedicated
to
the
value
metric
universe
and
if
there's
a
second
one,
have
them
dedicated
to
risk
I
proposed
both
in
the
google
Summer
of
Code
proposal,
and
we
can
split
between
those
working
groups
depending
on,
like
the
the
one
I'm.
What
we're
getting
for
sure
us
already
made
some
significant
contributions
and
I
think
would
be
able
to
do
things
like
produce
metrics
relatively
quickly.
C
C
C
C
C
B
B
C
Includes
me
and
the
team
that
I
have
so
there
are
well,
and
you
know
if
people
and
the
group
start
making
contributions,
you
know
the
paths
maintained
around
honor
is
not
not
too
difficult.
You
know
few
useful
contributions
that
especially
can
accelerate,
affordable
working
group,
but
our
process
is
pretty
straightforward.
Somebody
submits
a
pull
request
and
then
it
requires
two
reviews
and
it
requires
one
review
before
anybody
can
merge
it
and
the
person
submitting
it
can't
do
the
merging.
So
we
have
reasonable
github
controls
in
place,
so
we
don't
kill
each
other.
C
B
B
Well,
this
is
the
list
that
we
have
in
the
repository.
The
job
we
have
right
now
is
identifying,
which
ones
we
dedicate
our
time
towards
for
the
release
and
which
ones
we
are
just
gonna
ignore
for
now,
and
so
the
way
I
understood
it
I'm
just
going
to
start
color
coding
is
we
have
the
commit
count
by
organization
that
we
want
to
focus
on
and
then
everything
else
we
are
just
going
to
ignore
for
now.
B
B
A
B
Okay,
so
this
means
that
our
goal
is
to
write
a
markdown
page
for
each
one
of
these
metrics
describing
how
to
get
the
data
and
how
to
use
the
data
which,
in
the
first
four
means
we're
going
to
write.
A
page
that
says
commits
are
valuable
because
you
find
the
data
going
to
our
gir.
It
can
answer
these
questions
and
then
for
the
ones
with
later
investment.
We
say:
do
what
we
just
said
in
the
other
document
and
now
copy
paste
the
data
into
a
spreadsheet
and
here's
the
formula
you
can
use
to
parameterize.
It.