►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Community.Sept.29.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Community.Sept.29.2020
A
That
is
happening
on
october,
19th
and
20th,
and
the
kind
folks
at
baturgia
have
donated
a
booth
for
us
for
the
chaos
project
as
part
of
their
sponsorship.
So
it's
virtual.
It's
really
cool.
I
have
not
personally
done
a
virtual
booth
yet,
but
so
I'm
excited
to
try
this
out
and
it
has
a
little
moon
landing.
Lunar
little
lunar
pod
thing
it's
pretty
cool
because
that's
their
theme
anyway,
I
digress.
We
do
have
slots
if
you
are
interested
in
chatting
with
people
about
the
chaos
project.
A
There
is
a
signup
sheet
and
I
have
oh
thank
you
for
recording
this
map.
I
apologize.
I
did
not
do
that.
If
you
would
like
to
staff,
the
virtual
booth
feel
free
to
add
your
name
wherever
I'm
not
sure
how
many
people
we
will
need.
So
I'm
I'm
just
guessing.
We
will
need
two,
but
if
we
have
a
lot
of
people
who
would
like
to
participate,
then
I
I
put
my
name
down
a
lot,
so
I
can
by
all
means
I
I'm
great
at
not
doing
stuff.
A
So
I'm
more
than
happy
to
stand
back
and
let
others
have
a
chance
to
to
chat
with
people
about
chaos,
so
feel
free
to
add
your
name
wherever
you
want
and
I'll
make
sure
that
you
have
all
the
information
beforehand
on
how
how
it
works
and
what
you're
supposed
to
do
and
all
that
stuff
and
also
the
conference
itself,
is
free
to
attend.
So
if
you're,
not
virtual,
conferenced
out
yet
I
it
all
things.
A
C
E
F
D
C
B
F
A
All
right
and
then
from
last
week
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everyone
again
about
hacktoberfest.
I
know
grimorlab,
they
are
gonna,
be
setting
up
a
page,
a
dedicated
page
on
their
website
about
how
they
people
can
participate
and
all
of
that
good
stuff-
and
I
know
auger,
I'm
pretty
sure
sean
wright
is
gonna
to
be
labeling
some
issues
that
would
be
appropriate
for
hacktoberfest
as
well.
So
if
you,
if
anyone
on
the
call
or
if
you
know
it.
G
A
B
A
Teamwork
makes
the
dream
work
all
right,
yeah,
so
we'll
do
that
dni,
badging
promotion.
So
last
time
we
said
we
were
going
to
ask
people.
We
were
going
to
voluntold
bow
and
tell
people
to
if
they
could,
but
at
all
reach
out
to
events
that
they
know
of
that
were
hosting
events
or
organizations
they
know
of
that
were
hosting
events
to
have
them
request
a
badge
I
don't
know.
If
that
happened,
does
anyone
have
any
follow-up
or
any
feedback
or
matt
smell.
A
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
I
know
there
was
some
issues
with
the
images,
the
logos
that
were
kind
of
blocking
the
form.
So
I
think
we're
I
think,
we're
getting
close
to
working
out
those
few
bugs
there's
just
a
few
browser
bugs
that
you
know,
because
the
internet
works
on
some
browsers
and
not
on
the
others,
so
because
things
have
to
be
hard
all
the
time
so
yeah
and
I'm
looking
down
here
to
see
what
else
we
have
oh
dependencies.
A
So
that's
my
understanding
is
that
every
working
group
will
be
addressing
the
the
idea
of
dependencies
in
their
own
ways.
So
obviously
it
will
look
a
little
different
in
the
evolution
group
versus
the
risk
group
versus
whoever
else.
So
if,
if
you
were
one
of
those
people
who
are
like
yeah,
I'm
really
interested
in
talking
about
that,
then
you
might
pick
a
working
group
or
two
to
join
if
you
can
and
bring
those
up
at
those
individual
meetings.
A
K
K
A
little
bit
of
the
thought
process
that
led
us
to
that
which
was
dependencies
are
such
a
huge
topic
that
I
think
at
least
some
of
us
felt
that
creating
just
a
singular
group
to
look
at
it
might
arbitrarily
limit
what
people
are
able
to
come
up
with
organically
and
so
by.
An
initial
phase
is
encouraging
multiple
groups
that
are
interested
in
it
to
go
through
how
they
would
approach
this
problem
independently.
K
Then,
when
we
come
back
together
as
a
group,
then
we
have
multiple
ideas
and
ways
that
we
can
approach
it,
and
so
I
think
the
eventuality
is
that
we'll
have
something
a
bit
more
focused
or
delegated.
So
if
we
come
up
with
a
bunch
of
categories
areas
of
interest
and
ways
to
scope
it,
then
we
can
break
that
up
and
ideally
align
it
to
the
working
groups
that
make
the
most
sense
to
cover
those
areas
of
dependencies.
K
As
that,
the
point
of
connection
to
know
when
it's
time
to
bring
bring
it
together
and
make
it
a
bit
more
of
a
focused
effort.
I
think
that
was
the
initial
thought.
After
talking
about
it
for
our
entire
meeting,
I
think
we
probably
had
other
agenda
items
that
we
didn't
get
to,
because
this
was
really
interesting.
But
it's
it's
such
a
big
topic
that
we,
we
didn't
feel
like.
We
had
an
immediate
direction
outside
of
that.
L
A
So
sophia
was
sharing
with
us
the
logic
behind
the
conversation
that
happened
in
the
risk
group,
I
think,
was
where
it
happened.
That
kind
of
just
was
like
the
final
okay.
This
is
what
we're
gonna
do
for
now.
Until
we
bring
everybody
back
together,
we're
gonna
keep
it
in
the
separate
working
groups.
So
did
you
have
anything
to
add
to
that.
B
I
think
I
think
it
makes
a
ton
of
sense.
I
do
so.
The
one
thing
that
I
do
keep
thinking
about
with
respect
to
dependencies
is,
we
are
going
to
have
to
have
some
tooling
at
some
point
somewhere,
and
I
know
that
folks
have
been
working
on
not
hearing
the
chaos
project,
but
other
projects
have
been
thinking
about
dependencies,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
we
kind
of
think
through
that
part
of
it
so
like
in
the
in
the
metrics
working
group
side
of
things.
B
A
G
I
G
We
also
know
that
we
need
to
look
at
the
import
statements
for
anything
that
is
a
github
project,
that's
not
distributed
by
a
package
manager
so
that
we
can
get
that
dependency
and
version
understood
and
and
there's
some
other
things
listed
in
the
email
I
sent
out.
But
there
is
a
difference
from
a
risk
perspective
between
runtime
and
development
dependencies.
G
B
B
K
F
You
know
how
much
university
contributes
like
other
folks.
You
know
other
other
industry
folks
do,
but
also
for
tenure
and
promotion,
and
things
like
that
demonstrating
impact
on
projects
and
proving
that
your
efforts
are
worthy
of
your
mighty
role
as
a
professor
are
important.
So
looking
at
things
like
that,
looking
at
what
kind
of
metrics
might
you
want
to
look
at
for
student
projects?
F
A
B
A
B
Just
can
you
attach
it
here
and
then
we
would
have
the
logo
and
we
can
put
it
on
the
report,
for
whatever
reason
like
jpegs
in
firefox
are
the
only
only
ones
that
will
come
across.
I
have
no
idea
why
so
we're
talking
to
to
folks
with
the
sales
force
team,
because
I
think
this
is
I'm
guessing.
This
is
an
issue
there
to
try
to
get
that
solved.
So
we
have
a
little
bit
of
a
hitch
right
now
in
the
community
reports.
Just
so
people
know
the
other
thing
and
I'm
sorry
if.
L
B
That's
probably
the
safest
approach.
To
be
honest
with
you
at
this
point,
and
probably
the
most
sensible
approach
to
to
be
honest
with
you,
too
so
good
idea,
and
then
the
the
only
other
thing
I
had
on
here
was
yeah
the
apache
thing,
and
I
I'm
guessing
all
of
you
are
familiar
with
the
apache
incubator,
about
projects
that
would
join
the
incubator
and
go
through
a
series
of
steps
to
try
to
determine
whether
or
not
they
would
become
apache
projects.
I
think
is.
B
C
B
L
E
D
A
I
think
he
was
mentioning
about.
Can
it
sounded
like
from
the
garbled
words
I
could
get?
I
think
he's
talking
about
the
continuation
of
or
or
like
revisiting,
some
of
the
metrics
that
we
released
a
while
ago
to
see
if
we
should
revise
them
or
improve
them.
Is
that
is
that
what
everyone
else
thought
he
was
talking
about
as
well?.
M
I'm
not
certain,
but
I
do
think
that
that
is
a
a
key
issue,
so
I
was
in
the
in
the
past
when
we,
when
we
did
metrics
releases,
all
of
the
metrics
would
basically
be
re-released
at
each
at
each
release,
so
it
would
go
through
the
review
process
again,
even
if
even
if
there
were
no
changes.
So
when
I
and
when
I
say
in
the
past,
we
only
did
that
once
or
twice,
but
there
was
a
general
process
where
we
were.
M
We
were
going
back
and
those
metrics
would
go
back
into
review.
We
are
lacking
that
now
and
I,
I
think,
to
a
degree.
The
working
groups
do
kind
of
once
it's
been
released,
it's
kind
of
let's
move
on
to
a
different
metric.
However
they're
they're
not
done
they
they
need
to
be.
I
think
they
need
continuous
attention
so
for
continued
attention.
B
F
A
G
I
M
I
was
gonna
say
we
could
add
some
language
to
the
the
metrics
release.
That
says
you
know
it
goes
through
this
review
period
prior
to
release.
However,
you
know
we're
still
accepting
comments
on
these
metrics
for
future
releases
or
for
future
revision,
and
so
direct
people
from
those
metrics
release
documents
to
to
still
comment
if
they
want
to.
Even
if
it's
outside
of
the
comment
period,
where
would
they
come
in,
I
think
it
would
probably
have
to
get
directed
to
the
the
working
group
that
the
metric
was
released.
B
L
Yeah,
I
my
sense
is
that
even
when
we
have
the
review
period,
we
don't
get
that
much
outside
contributions
outside
comments,
and
I
don't
I
don't
have
high
hopes
for
just
saying.
Hey,
please
comment.
Usually
we
seek
out
these
conversations
and
that's
what
we're
doing
with
in
the
working
groups
when
we
ask
people
about
their
experiences
or
through
the
podcasts
or
at
conferences,
when
we
talk
with
people,
that's
I
think,
where
we
collect
that
feedback.