►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Weekly.Hangout.Jan.08.2019
Description
CHAOSS.Weekly.Hangout.Jan.08.2019
B
B
C
C
E
D
C
B
Guess
the
question
right
now
for
for
those
groups
is,
it
seems
like
yes,
yes,
you'd
like
to
pursue
it
I
think
it's
now
to
the
point
of
coming
up
with
a
couple,
different
ideas
and
as
to
what
that
might
be,
does
does
D&I
have
anything
that
they
would
like
to
consider.
You
know.
Google
Summer
of
Code
is
really
about
coding,
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
anything.
A
G
During
the
information
here
during
our
pretty
Tron
internal
grant,
from
until
I'm
I
was
working
with
Steve
and
she
was
producing
some
specific
panelist.
At
least
oh.
B
Dashboards
that
she
was
putting
together
were
more
just
kind
of
prototype.
You
eyes,
if
I
recall,
I,
don't.
F
A
B
B
If
you
recall
what
this
was
proposal-
and
we
say
here
last
year,
we
said
here
are
three
different
ideas
and
then
to
move
actually
moved
forward
right,
and
so
the
idea
would
be
as
if
Dee
and
I
even
has
a
proposal
on
prototyping,
something
or
developing
something,
then
that
can
live
as
part
of
the
submission
and
we
could
have
four
different
types
of
proposals.
Again.
Maybe
only
funding
to
student,
you
know
are
four
different.
B
Maybe
only
funding
to
students
so
Dee
and
I
would
like
to
prototype
something
I
think
they'll
be
fantastic.
So
then
I
guess
that
it
does
raise
that
question.
Actually
I
haven't
looked
with
respect
to
outreach,
II
I'm,
not
sure
how
familiar
you
are
all
without
reaching,
but
it's
I
think
it's
from
the
software
freedom
Conservancy!
Isn't
it
and
it's
a
similar
spiled
program
the
that
really
focuses
on
underrepresented
individuals
to
engage
in
an
open-source
if
I'm,
remembering
this
all
correctly,
somebody
can
tell
me
I'm
wrong.
Basically.
A
That's
what
it
is:
it
came
out
of
the
genome
project
and
then
I
think
the
software
freedom
Conservancy
is
hosting
a
shepherding
it,
but
there
are
a
bunch
of
people
RedHat
that
run
it.
Okay
and
then
sage
sharp,
is
also
heavily
involved
with
it
as
well.
So
it's
really
for
lack
of
a
better
term.
It's
really
a
google
Summer
of
Code
like
program
that
is
targeting
gender
minorities,
transgender
and
also
I'm,
sorry,
blanking
and
and
also
yeah,
so,
gender,
transgender
alternative
sexual
orientation.
Just
any
of
that
people
are,
can
be
eligible
to
apply
a
program.
A
A
Mom,
that's
that's
basically,
a
so
google
Summer
of
Code.
Obviously
they
provide
to
syphon
anything.
You
outreach
e
as
the
organization
you
have
to
provide
it.
The
last
time
I
worked
with
them
was
when
I
was
worth
the
over
project
and
at
the
time
I
think
we
had
to
put
up
I
think
it
was
five
thousand
dollars.
Although
this
was
a
couple
of
years
ago,
okay,.
G
B
Let
me
let
me
actually
pursue
that
just
that,
okay,
or
do
you
have
anything?
Are
you
looking
up
outreach
e
stuff
right
now,
yeah?
So
it's
five.
A
B
Don't
you
and
I
connect
on
that
as
well
and
get
a
little
more
info
in
terms
of
the
stipend
I
think
this
is
something
that
perhaps
Shawn
and
I
could
rustle
up
Shawn
and
speak
up
ya
know
I'm
thinking
as
some
of
the
groups
that
we
work
with
yeah
I
agree.
We
came
a
little
approached
some
of
my
folks
Marshall
some
resources
behind
this
as
well
yep.
Exactly
so
I
think.
B
Maybe
one
of
the
first
passes
would
be
support
from
you
know
and
Missouri,
ostensibly
right
yeah,
so
it
mean
we
can
try
to
pursue
that
just
a
little
bit.
Anybody
else
is
welcome
to
donate,
but
I
I,
wouldn't
I
would
have
asked
that
question
right
now.
So
why
don't?
Maybe
Georg
and
I
can
find
out
some
more
information
and
come
back
to
that
next
week.
I
guess.
A
D
B
C
B
B
B
Okay,
your
funding
at
least
one
in
$6,500,
okay,
okay,
that
seems
within
the
realm
of
possibilities.
What
are
you
anything
else
on
these
types
of
interning
projects?
Okay,
cool,
well,
I,
think
me
or
you
and
I'll:
do
it
connect
next
and
bring
more
info
back
to
group?
Okay,
so
one
of
the
other
things
I
have
on
this
list
is
we
have?
B
This
has
come
up
several
times
in
the
diversity
and
inclusion
group,
which
is
with
respect
to
a
metric
called
organizational
diversity
all
right,
and
so
you
all
can
like
correct
me
as
I
as
I
speak.
But
basically
the
the
discussion
is
is
whether
or
not
to
include
organizational
diversity
under
the
auspices
of
the
DNA
workgroup.
B
I
You
say
I
think
it's
actually
a
slightly
different
question.
I!
Think
the
question
is:
what
do
we
do
in
general,
with
important
project
health
metrics
that
don't
cleanly
fit
into
DNI
or
growth
maturity
and
decline,
because
I
I
have
a
hard
time,
believing
that
organizational
diversity
is
the
only
thing?
That's
a
project
health
metric
that
isn't
actually
being
done
by
one
of
the
two
groups.
I
D
Working
groups
need
to
work
with
the
metrics.
They
feel
this
should
be
working
with,
because
basically
they
are
working
on
a
volunteer
basis.
So
we
don't.
We
cannot
tell
this
working
group.
You
should
be
working
with
this
if
the
working
group
doesn't
feel
like
that,
and
the
second
thing
is
I
completely
agree
that
they
are
meeting
all
the
metrics
that
they're,
probably
out
of
scope,
both
groups
now
and
but
we
were
discussing
this
in
our
last
meeting.
If
you
remember
and
I
think
that
proposal
we
had
was
list.
Let's
just
take
note
of
this.
D
Some
were
in
the
metrics
inventory
saying
it
could
be
nice
working
with
this
matrix,
because
many
people
were
explicit
interested
in
whatever,
but
right
now
there
is
no
working
group
with
working
with
this.
So
you
won't
start
a
new
one
or
really
did
little
did
they
report
somehow.
Otherwise,
that's
not
going
to
fly
that's
by
assigning
this
metric
to
this
work,
because
because
we
say
like
that,
yeah.
I
So
I
mean
I
would
so
my
question
to
this
this
group.
If
we,
if
we
started
sort
of
a
maybe
an
overall
project,
health
I,
don't
know
what
we'd
call
it
if
we
started
a
working
group
to
handle
these,
these
poor
neglected
metrics
that
don't
fit
in
either
one
but
are
important.
How
many
people
would
be
interested
in
participating
in
helping
to
find
those
metrics.
C
So
I
mean
I
think
by
default.
Anyone
that's
involved
in
working
group
or
those
metrics
would
be
sort
of
matrix
in
potentially.
It's
like
organizational
diversity
is
a
great
example,
because
I
think
it
does
have
a
home
in
both
diversity
and
inclusion
and
in
growth,
maturity
and
decline.
Like
I
agree
with
you
that
that's
just
one
example
of
many,
but
it's
an
example
with
where
two
working
groups
have
a
stake
in.
I
It
yeah
but
I
guess
my
question
is
I'll,
maybe
a
little.
Let
me
rephrase
the
question
to
be
very
specific.
How
many
of
you
would
commit
an
hour
of
time,
two
and
then
hours
of
time.
You
know
a
couple
hours
of
time
outside
of
the
meeting
to
help
define
these
metrics,
because
if
nobody
has
the
bandwidth
to
do
this,
then
I
won't
start
a
new
working
group.
I
If
other
people
are
interested
and
have
the
bandwidth
to
do
this,
so
maybe
we
should
kick
off
a
thread
in
the
in
the
mailing
list,
but
you
know
I
would
be
happy
to
you
know
to
sort
of
work
on
kind
of
scheduling
the
meetings
and
participate
in
this
working
group,
but
not
if
I'm
the
only
one
who's
going
to
commit
the
time
to
it,
because
if
we
don't
have
enough
people
to
commit
the
time
to
it,
then
maybe
we
wait
and
start
it
up
later.
I'd.
C
I
think
when
we,
when
the
girls
immaturity
decline
in
group,
there
was
we've
refactored
the
repository
over
the
last
year.
There
are
metrics
we
created
in
the
past
that
don't
exist
anywhere
right
now,
but
you
know
so
there
are
there,
probably
a
dozen
or
more
lissa
metrics,
as
we
speak,
that
there
were
sort
of
abandoned
or
left
by
the
wayside.
For
the
moment
when
we
created
the
working
group,
so
I
think
there's
a
bunch
that
already
have
to
be
addressed
in
the
Sun
I
would
be
willing
to
commit.
D
Go
and
open
a
working
group
for
working
with
everything
that
nobody
else
is
doing
and
what
this
more
feasible
I
think
is,
if
you're
interested,
for
instance,
in
organizational
diversity.
Let's
open
a
working
group
specifically
for
that
and
if,
while
working
on
that,
the
working
group
finds
out
some
other
related
metrics
that
they
want
to
deal
with.
Of
course,
they
can
also
do
that,
but
I
think
it's
easier
to
focus
the
working
group
or
something
specific
and
not
on.
Let's
say
everything:
bad.
What
the
current
working
with
the.
A
Just
to
tie
this
in
with
the
history
of
the
chaos
project
a
little
bit
when
we
started
the
CAF
project
almost
two
years
ago,
we
founded
it
with
two
work
groups,
the
software
and
the
metrics,
no
committees,
and
so
the
metrics
committees,
where
we
have
this
laundry
list
of
all
the
metrics
and
then
from
there
we
started
the
work
groups
to
really
hone
in
on
the
details
on
how
do
we
implement
it
in
software?
How
do
we
deploy
it
and
so
on,
and
the
work
groups
naturally
selected?
F
A
So
the
work
groups,
in
my
mind,
are
the
place
where
we
get
together
to
spec
out
the
metrics
to
drive
implementation
to
advocate
for
a
subset
of
all
the
metrics
that
we
have
in
the
metrics
committee
yep
and
then
once
we
are
at
a
place
where
we're
good
with
a
set
of
metrics,
we
can
disband
the
workgroups
and
have
the
metrics
committee
as
the
place
where
all
the
metrics
live
take
on
again.
Until
someone
again
wants
to
refine
it
should.
A
D
Formula
structure
of
couch
is
a
metrics
committee
and
subcommittee.
The
support
community
is
usually
doing
the
staff.
The
brigade's
are
doing
the
staff
I
mean
no
GUI
is
improving
and
more
like
on
soil.
It's
improving
the
activity
of
the
metrics
committee
in
the
most
part
moved
to
the
working
groups,
the
stuff
that
we
are
doing
in
the
working
groups
now
or
what
the
metrics
committee
were
supported
to
do.
D
I
B
B
A
B
I
B
B
C
H
C
I
I
think
well
definitely
submit
I
think
we
talked
about
something
a
panel
yeah.
C
I
G
I
B
B
I
B
G
F
F
G
So
we
presented
a
use
case
with
over
the
original
data
for
their
open
source
office.
Okay,
when
and
then
what
didn't
I
don't
really
know,
because
I
am
probably
feeling
the
abstract
thing
like
the
day
before,
but
something
make
it
to
matrix
versus
so
for
sure
we
are
sending
these
with.
You
were
I
would
like
to
send
another
one,
as
we
tend
for
different
source,
a
meeting
adding
board.
We
not
see
enough
Foundation,
which
is
hollow
use
case
a
bit
different.
Okay,
didn't
that
wine-growing!
Okay,.
H
B
C
Yes,
we're
gonna;
yes,
that's
correct!
We're
aiming
to
have
something
ready
for
FOSDEM,
okay
and
I.
Think
we're
making
okay
progress
on
that.
Okay,
when
is
FOSDEM,
1st
and
2nd
of
February,
or
is
it
the
second
third
with
tasks
on
the
first?
Is
that
right,
I
think
that's
right,
everybody's
nodding
that
the
second
thing
I
said
was
right.
Yeah.
B
C
I
think
so
I
I
don't
know
what
hey
C's
thinks
I
mean
it.
We
could
always
have
more
progress
than
we
do,
but
I
think
we
have
something.
That's
fleshed
out
enough
to
facilitate
a
discussion.
Okay,
we'll
be
by
the
tent
busting
happens.
Do
you
feel
the
same?
You,
sir,
are
you
wickedly
concerned
I,
think
you
might
be
muted,
hisses.
C
D
Yeah
I
think
that
we
have
to
focus
on
this
right
now
and
we
are
still
have
three
weeks.
So,
let's
see
I'm
confident,
better
stowed,
let's
see
what
we
can
do
the
industry,
which
okay.
B
A
A
D
We
also
have
this
issue
with
the
second
boom,
because,
finally,
we
decided
to
go
with
a
single
track
and
we
have
two
rooms
that
are
so
we
can
find
out
some
use
for
the
second
room.
Some
of
the
suggestions
that
we
have
been
talking
about
this
was
having
something
like
a
hockey
space
or
a
space
for
small
meetings
or
but
anything
that
you
may
find
convenient
for
that
room.
We
have
it
available
during
the
whole
day,
so.
I
G
G
F
G
Are
talking
if
we
want
some
things
that
we
didn't
know
about
to
talk
price
of
this,
but
in
any
case
all
of
the
coffee
and
so
on
for
the
full
day
it
would
be
like
900
euros.
If
you
want
some
lunch
plus
the
shirts.
That
would
be
one
point.
Five
extra
and
some
people
run
some
stuff
from
the
place
would
be
around
500
euros,
so
at
least
coffee
would
design
something
like
1000
whole
way.
B
G
F
G
All
of
these,
my
suggestion
would
be
that
we
have
some,
perhaps
some
room
for
working
if
people
want
to
work
in
some
place
and
perhaps
some
team
or
place
for
anyone
joining
the
discussion.
So
in
any
case
they
won't
want
so
some
when
they
are
working
at
or
some
local
or
remote,
lab
or
anything
else
and.