►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Community.April.2.2019
Description
CHAOSS.Community.April.2.2019
A
So
why
don't
we
start
out
with
working
group
updates
I,
see
that
we
have
Jessica
here,
I
think
Andy's
on
as
well,
and
then
Georg
is
here:
I
mean
I,
know
Sean
will
be
joining
a
little
bit.
So
I
think
this
is
pretty
old
coverage
right
now
or
maybe
able
to
start
with
Jessica
Jessica.
Do
you
want
to
tell
us
what's
going
on
with
risk
I.
B
I
think
that
invitation,
if
I'm
remembering
correctly,
went
out
yesterday
by
an
email
thumbs
up
that
so
hopefully,
starting
next
week,
we
will
start
getting
some
interested
participants
from
outside
the
LF
and
this
group
to
start
participating
in
that
and
really
get
the
ball
rolling
on
actually
starting
to
come
up
with
a
metric.
So
we're
going
to
use
and
how
those
going
to
be
measured,
etcetera
do.
A
B
A
C
D
B
A
E
B
E
Another
thing
that
that
we
have
done
is
yesterday.
We
submitted
a
proposal
for
amount,
a
value
metrics
group
talked
at
the
open
source
summit
in
North
America
and
that's
going
to
be
in
you
know,
Nagas.
So
we'll
keep
our
fingers
crossed
about
that
one
and
beyond
that,
we
just
have
a
tremendous
amount
of
material
to
dig
into
on
the
focus
areas
that
we
have
identified.
E
A
C
A
E
E
F
E
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
can
get
out
that
would
be
public
would
be
what
do
practitioners
in
the
space
actually
care
about
and
by
practitioners,
mostly,
we
were
focused
on
I
think
we're
going
to
be
focused
on
open
source
program
offices.
So
these
are
offices.
These
are
people
that
are
attached
to
large
companies.
Companies
like
Microsoft
Netflix,
Disney
of
you
know.
Many
large
companies
have
open
source
program
offices.
Comcast
has
one
there's.
E
E
A
Good
all
right
so
then
I
guess
just
an
update
to
both
risk
and
value
working
groups.
This
is
the
participate
page,
so
we're
working
to
I.
Think
both
of
you
are
in
the
spot
to
kind
of
go
public
right
to
encourage
more
participants.
I
think
you
kind
of
shaped
out
your
thing
so
in
this
participate
page
right
now,
the
way
it's
set
up
you
can
see.
We
have
the
Kaos
community
calls
and
then.
A
Gmb,
which
may
change
names
here
shortly
in
DNI,
we're
basically
just
gonna
split
the
chaos
community
banner
that
large
banner
into
three
just
like
below
and
it'll,
be
the
community
call
value
and
risk
well,
but
we'll
get
all
that
information
in
there
for
you,
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
pull
request,
er
and
I
think
it's
just
an
issue
sitting
on
the
website
right
now,
so,
okay,
that
was
that.
Thank
you
anything
else.
Andy
no.
E
B
C
A
A
E
A
E
A
A
A
F
B
F
D
A
F
A
F
D
D
C
A
The
gender
survey
so
I
think
that's
going
to
be
something
that
may
or
may
not
be
on
the
radar
DNI
I'm
guessing
it
will
be
I.
Think
I,
don't
know
when
the
last
time
OpenStack
ran
the
survey.
But
so
that's
something
that's
important,
become
some
notes
here
and
then
have
you.
Has
there
been
any
discussion?
I
know
that
at
the
Leadership
Summit
there
was
talk
about
the
hyper
ledger
project
Indy
and
about.
A
C
C
A
Thank
you
all
right,
any!
That's
everybody
on
the
on
the
working
groups,
software
updates,
so
he
suicided
stopped
you
before,
but
now
I
I
will
open
it
up
again.
F
B
F
F
F
A
C
The
developer
certificate
of
origin
sign
offs
that
are
required
by
our
charter.
We
have
activated
the
DCO
bot
that
makes
sure
new
commits
have
the
sign-off
26
out
of
29
repositories
are
already
active,
we're
only
missing
the
website.
Repository
metrics,
you
postering
auger,
with
the
regards
to
the
website
repository
I'm,
just
waiting
on
confirmation
from
Kevin
that
he
is
informed
in
knows
how
to
use
DCO
metrics.
We
are
waiting
on
common
working
group
which
should
give
their
okay
this
week,
okay,
auger
I,
don't
know.
Okay,.
C
A
C
A
A
A
C
The
counter
proposal
was
to
move
this
up
by
two
weeks,
basically
release
at
the
beginning
of
August,
which
gives
us
more
time
before
chaos,
cone
incomes
or
summit
North
America
to
really
fully
distribute
the
metrics
talk
about
it,
blog
blog
about
it
and
so
on.
So
that's
the
proposed
timeline
so
far,
I.
C
A
Ok,
so
I
guess
kind
of
from
my
perspective,
I'm,
gonna,
I,
think
kind
of
be
the
person
shepherding
the
metrics
out
of
the
working
groups
into
web
page.
So
there's
just
a
little
bit
of
a
link
that
needs
to
be
created,
I'm
guessing
that
Kevin
will
help
and
Georg
I'll
help
too.
Maybe
so
I
think
the
question
is:
do
we
go
to
the
working
groups
and
and
kind
of
ask
how
they
plan
on
releasing
yes,
I'd
like
a
little
input
on
on
this
just
process-wise.
F
I
find
the
released
online
reasonable.
The
only
travel
that
I
see
is
that
maybe
starting
from
me
mid-july,
at
least
in
Europe
humanity
problem
to
the
application,
which
means
a
if
we
need
coordination
work
between
the
different
working
groups,
that's
going
to
be
difficult
to
do
in
late,
July
and
August.
So
maybe-
and
only
maybe
we
could
have
some.
F
A
A
A
Gerd
on
DNI
and
Georg,
on
common
and
a
sous
on
GMD
and
Shawna,
and
GMB
and
risk
risk
and
Jessica
on
risk
and
Andy.
It
kind
of
start
in
the
back
of
your
mind,
thinking
what
what
would
be
candidate
release
focus
areas
and
then
what
the
candidate
release
metrics
would
be
as
well.
I
think,
as
Sean
had
pointed
out,
that
the
released
metrics
need
to
have
a
worked
out
description
page.
G
G
A
F
The
case
of
G
and
V
I
think
that
in
the
first
of
this
area,
code
development
is
almost
green
in
terms
of
list
of
methods,
and
we
also
have
a
template
for
the
metrics
and
we
have
like
10
metrics,
supposedly
really,
we
did
winners
at
it.
What
a
group,
once
we
have
to
look
at
them,
it
would
be
nice
getting
feedback,
including
things
that
we
find
are
missing
things
that
we
should
change
or
something
you're.
F
E
A
E
A
Whatever
and
people
can
correct
me
if
I'm
reading
this
wrong
but
we'll
have
a
release
cycle,
so
we'll
have
a
regular
cadence
of
release
and
then,
if
the
working
group
would
like
to
make
changes
to
the
essentially
the
focus
groups
and
metrics
that
were
part
of
that
release,
go
ahead.
That's
completely
fine,
but
that's
not
a
change
that
we'd
see
necessarily
reflected
on
the
webpage
until
the
next
release.
A
H
A
F
H
D
H
F
A
All
right
cool
any
other
comments
on
release
timeline.
Thank
you.
This
is
very
helpful.
Hey
I,
think.
One
of
the
things
that's
helpful
to
me
is
that
we
were
talking
about
this
issue
in
shorter
increments
of
time,
so
when
it
comes
up
we're
able
to
get
through
it
more
quickly,
every
time
which
means
that
we're
all
starting
to
get
up
to
the
same
page,
which
is
good
to
me.
G
We
have
we
we've
done
a
pretty
significant
release,
basically
get
repo
statistics
with
the
new
overview
page
that
will
compare
all
of
the
projects,
all
their
pasta
tours
in
a
project
group.
So
that's
probably
worth
worth
doing
and
that's
available
on
the
dev
branch
right
now
we're
releasing
it
to
master
it
pretty
shortly.
G
We
yeah
I
mean
there's
a
docker
container
available.
Oh,
you
have
a
camera
one.
Last
time
we
updated
was
augers
completely
downloadable
and
runnable
out
of
the
box
on
a
big
Hrant
machine.
Now,
so
you
can,
you
can
just
download
it
and
run
it
much
more
easily.
We
did
a
lot
of
work
earlier
this
spring,
leading
up
to
the
open
source,
Leadership
Summit,
to
make
the
new
comer
experience
more
straightforward
and
the
work
that
we're
sliding
through
from
now
until
the
open
source
summit.
G
D
G
A
Thank
you
and
then
my
last
issue
is
currently
the
it's
about
how
the
working
groups
work,
and
so
the
working
groups
all
work
a
little
bit
differently,
and
so
the
way
that
DNI
works
is
different
than
the
way
that
common
works.
So,
for
example,
D&I
has
a
DNA
repository
there,
they're
focused
on
that
they
built
their
focus
areas.
How
about
this?
A
lot
of
working
groups
follow
the
same
focus
area
goal
question
metric
approach,
but
the
way
they
get
that
work
done
is
different.
A
G
Think
it's
I
think
it's
where
we
rename
things
from
what
they
are
and
the
metrics
repository
that
has
caused
cause
some
early
consternation
but
yeah
I
think
we're
gonna
get
a
process
down,
yeah
and
but
I
think
you
know
the
the
common
metrics
repository
is
gonna
gone
group
is
gonna,
have
an
easier
time
getting
there
stuffing,
because
it'll
be
a
pretty
straightforward.
Okay,.
A
A
I
mean
I
think
it's
hard.
My
own
concern
on
this
is
it's
from
a
newcomer
experience
it's
hard
to
when
you
have
five
different
working
groups,
kind
of
working,
five
different
ways
and
not
totally
different
ways,
but
slightly
different
ways.
Does
that
inhibit
that
experience
at
all,
and
should
we
be
concerned
about
this.
I
I've
got
a
I
can't
weigh
in
on
this
one
sure,
I
think
that
if
people
are
doing
work
well
in
a
certain
way,
we
shouldn't
try
to
change
it
and
I
think
that
it's
good
as
long
as
you
can
standardize
it
a
little
bit
so
that
people
don't
get
confused
that
it's
good
to
have
a
way
they
can
do
it
on
their
own
way.
Okay,.
A
J
J
A
F
Think
that
maybe
to
do
is
to
keep
all
of
us
informed
about
how
the
other
working
groups
are
working
so
that
we
can
learn
best
practices
and
fix
things
that
are
working
in
other
working
groups
and
maybe
taking
advantage
of
Kathryn
to
serve
different
processes
and
different
uses
that
we
have
in
the
working
groups
trying
to
find
out
whether
it
makes
sense
to
import
practices
in
bollywood
goods
to
try
to
standardize
to
a
certain
model.
The
things
about
working,
because
I
think
that
that's
good
I
can
do
that.
B
F
A
That's
fair,
like
one
of
the
things
right
now
is
on
github
at
the
in
the
chaos
organization.
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
repository
for
common.
This
is
as
an
example
there
in
the
metrics
repository,
but
GMD
has
a
repository
risk
as
a
repository
value
has
a
repository.
Dni
has
a
repository
common
kind
of
does
in
the
sense
that
they're
in
the
metrics
repository.
G
F
I
go
to
the
same
thing
that
we
did
in
GE,
but
I
think
that
the
people
in
the
working
group
me
it
is
I
did
named
Orion
that
they
can
see
is
coordination
with
other
working
groups
at
some
point
want
to
use
metrics
cool
and
at
some
point
we
need
to
coordinate
medical
stir,
so
maybe
that
that
can
cause
some
some
noise.
You
do
not
know
that,
but
you
know
I,
don't
think
it's
a
big
power
now.
F
A
It's
really
problematic,
as
working
group
to
try
to
coordinate
down
the
road.
So
all
right,
I
mean
I'll
just
throw
this
out
here
and
not
asking
for
a
solution
today
or
maybe
the
solution
is
just
to
continue
to
stay
on
the
current
path
and
just
kind
of
watch,
but
just
as
a
note,
I'm
I'm
trying
to
I'm.
E
Attentive
to
this
so
I
I'm,
a
newcomer
and
as
the
newcomer
I,
really
appreciate
the
fact
that
Cass
has
a
process
and
and
to
me,
it's
really
nice
just
to
drop
in
and
not
have
to
think
this
stuff
through
from
scratch.
If
I
can
just
ask
a
question,
what
is
your
standard
and
comply
with?
That
makes
it
really
nice,
as
a
newcomer
and
also
I,
know
it's
a
lot
of
work
to
establish
standards
and
to
think
about
standard
practice.
E
The
way
that
meetings
are
held,
the
fact
that
you've
got
a
note-taker
for
a
meeting
the
fact
that
you've
got
a
facilitator
who
sends
out
a
notice
of
advance
the
the
formatting
of
the
meeting
minutes.
It
takes
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
to
figure
out
what
that
is,
and
I
I
think
it's
really
valuable
to.
C
E
C
This
brings
me
to
a
topic
that
I
very
much
wanted
to
also
bring
up,
and
that
is
the
community
handbook
everywhere.
The
idea
is
to
document
how
we
are
operating.
The
goal
of
the
handbook
is
to
document
what
I'll
be
doing
right
now
and
how
are
we
going
about
doing
it?
It's
and
then,
through
this
work,
maybe
having
it
written
down
how
the
working
groups
operate.
We
can
then
see
what
are
the
best
practices
that
we
want
to
adopt
in
other
working
groups
and
where
do
the
differences
make
sense?