►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Community.Sept.15.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Community.Sept.15.2020
B
That
was
recording
that's
good
enough
hi,
everyone
who
is
watching
the
recording
and
welcome
to
this
week's
community
call
on
tuesday
september
15th
we're
gonna
jump
right
in
because
we
have
exciting
things
going
on
in
the
chaos
project
very,
very
exciting.
B
The
I
saw
there
was
a
little
mini
thread
about
changing
the
word
programs
to
initiatives.
So
I
think
that's.
What
we're
gonna
do
is
that
right,
matt
g.
A
Yeah,
I
think
so
so
my
only
thing
was
we
have
this,
this
term
called
programs
which
is
like
the
dna
badging
program
and
the
community,
the
community
reports
we
kind
of
put
those
under
programs,
and
then
we
put
it
on
the
website
and
it
seemed
so
functional.
B
A
A
B
A
B
I
think
that
looks
awesome
and
we
already
have
one
launched
so
go
us,
and
that
is
of
course
the
fabulous
dni
badging
program
that
launched
today
minutes
ago
officially
was
merged
into
the
website.
So
there's
the
blog
post.
If
you
all
want
to
go,
read
it,
and
I
think
that
the
twitter
account
will
grab
that
automatically.
B
So
when
you
see
that
tweet
come
out,
if
you
would
not
mind
but
to
help
us
spread
the
word
and
help
people
find
where
they
can
choose
to
submit
their
event
for
a
badge
that
would
be
fantastic.
We
would
really
appreciate
your
help
with
outreach
on
that,
because
we
want
a
good
response,
maybe
not
too
good,
but
we
do
have
six
reviewers,
but
you
know
it's
early
on
so
but
yeah.
No,
I
think
that's
just
fabulous
work,
matt
snell!
You
want
to
talk
anything
say
anything
about
that.
C
I
really
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everyone.
Who's
been
a
part
of
the
dna
badging
pro
initiative
and
and
that
I
really
appreciate,
even
if
you've
just
kind
of
touched,
the
project
talked
about
something
that
could
be
improved.
You've
really
made
a
big
impact
on
this
program
initiative
and
hopefully,
we'll
see
some
some
improvement
in
the
community
as
a
result
of
that.
So
I
just
really
appreciate
all
of
you
for
that.
A
Mine
is
I'm
super
excited
too,
I'm
a
little
terrified
that
people
that
we
might
get
a
lot
of
requests
and
so
just
kind
of
making
sure
it
goes
well.
I
think
the
workflow
is
really
good
and
I
think
that
we
have
like
the
review
process.
I
think
it's
there
maybe
have
to
be
some
things
that
get
worked
out,
which
is
totally
fine.
I'm
that's!
Okay.
A
We
did
put
on
there
that
we
request
a
two-month
lead
time
if
an
event
is
gonna
request,
a
badge.
So
if
we
don't
get
like
a
week,
five
day
request
turnaround.
I
just
don't
think
we
can
do
it
and
then
I
do
think
we're
gonna
need
more
reviewers,
as
this
goes
on.
So
maybe
in
the
outreach
stuff
elizabeth
we
could
also
say
and
don't.
B
B
You
know
yeah
100
and
if
someone
is
considering
being
a
reviewer
about
their
maybe
a
little
unsure
of
you
know
how
it
kind
of
goes,
there's
a
great
process
that
matt
has
set
up
for
onboarding
reviewers,
so
we're
not
just
gonna.
You
know
throw
you
out
into
the
the
wilderness
alone.
With
this,
we
will
definitely
guide
you
along
the
way
and
help
you
review,
and
so
don't
don't
be
afraid
to
do
that.
D
C
Yeah,
I
think
we
talked
about
that
in
the
blog
post
and
we
can
probably
just
kind
of
port
that
as
because
we
have
a
really
good
section
about
that
that
we
can
just
put
in
its
own
kind
of
section.
Like
you
said,
I
think
that
sounds
great.
E
I
think
that
that
participate
page
is
already
getting
pretty
loud,
so
I
would.
I
would
give
that
some
considerable
thought
before
adding
any
more
any
more
things
to
it.
I
think
right
now,
matt
snell
has
that
information
at
the
top
of
the
the
badging
program,
page.
C
I
think
it
might
be
even
a
better
place
to
add
it
to
the.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
anything
specifically
about
reviewing
for
the
project
on
the
initiative
cni
badging
page.
So
that
should
be
something
that
could
be
something
we
put
into
the
reviewer
list.
So
hey,
if
you
want
to
add
yourself
to
the
list,
go
to
an
orientation
meeting
with
me
and
or
someone
who's
a
maintainer,
and
then
you
just
contact
this
person
to
get
started
or
fill
out.
E
If
we're,
if
we're
needing
reviewers,
we
can
also
make
a
call
on
the
the
front
page,
a
call
out
on
the
front
page
for
for
volunteers.
C
C
B
All
right,
let's
move
on
to
our
next
item,
which
is
the
community
report
launch,
which
will
also
happen
imminently,
because
we
are
absolutely
ready
to
go
with
that
and
if
anyone
here
is
newish
and
isn't
quite
familiar
with
that
process.
Essentially
we
are
offering
to
run
a
one-page
report
for
anyone
that
wants
one
so
that
just
gives
them
some
high
level
metrics
around
the
health
of
their
communities,
and
we
just
do
one
one
repo
right
now
and
we
have
a
couple
week
turnaround.
B
I
think
we
we
say,
but
we
will
be
launching
that
probably
tomorrow,
I
would
imagine,
since
we
did
the
dni
badging
today,
that'd
be
probably
a
lot.
So
maybe
tomorrow
we
will
be
launching
this
community
report
and
that's
also
very
very
exciting.
The
report
is
made
of
two
graphs
from
gramor
lab
and
two
from
auger,
and
then
we
will
be
sending
that
out
to
the
people
directly
who
oh
yay
there
you
go
who's
doing
that
matt
so
good.
B
It's
almost
like
we
planned
that
to
happen,
but
we
didn't
so
good
job
anyway.
That's
what
the
report
looks
like
and
yeah.
So
that's
what
the
the
receiver
will
will
see
when
they
get
that
and
obviously
it
will
have
their
their
information
there.
B
So
if
anyone
has
any
questions
about
that,
let
us
know
there
should
be.
I
think
it's
already
live
on
the
site,
but
there's
a
form
that
people
fill
out,
that
you
know
they
provide
all
their
information
and
we
kind
of
give
little
teasers
as
well
as
if
you
know
they
want
more
information
about
chaos
or
if
they
want
more
metrics
in
the
future.
So
we're
also
trying
to
get
some
insight
from
them
as
to
like
what
what's
important
to
them
and
what
they
why
they
want
to
see
the
health
of
their
community.
B
So
we're
kind
of
also
hoping
to
get
some
more
insight
around
people
who
are
who
are
submitting
these
reports
as
well
and
and
really
the
goal
is
for
them
to
want
to
dig
in
deeper
on
their
own,
with
with
using
more
of
our
metrics
and
implementing
them
in
their
process,
so
which
is
kind
of
kind
of
like
a
a
little
teaser
for
them.
B
Yeah,
so
that
will
be
another
one
to
watch
for
probably
tomorrow
again
to
just
watch.
If
you're
a
twitterer,
then
you
can
retweet.
That
would
be
greatly
appreciated.
Maybe
if
you
have
a
lot
of
followers,
maybe
don't
don't
do
that,
but
no
I'm
just
kidding.
We
would
love
any
help.
You
had
in
outreach.
E
I've
dropped
some
notes
into
the
google
document
page
as
well.
We
do.
We
do
still
need
some
help
with
the
design
and
editing
that
the
chaos
report
form
web
page.
So
as
as
you
said,
the
the
form
is
actually
live
on
the
website.
However,
it
is
not
included
in
navigation,
yet
so
there's
there's
a
link
there.
You
can
peek
at
what
it
looks
like.
E
B
E
Be
gray
so
that
was
a
design
choice
that
they
made.
Yes,
the
form
cannot
be
gray.
We
can
go
in
and
edit
that
fairly
easily,
but
that
was
a
that
was
a
design
choice
that
came
from
the
I,
the
the
team
at
the
linux
foundation,
that
made
the
form
so
that
that
form
code
is
on
the
website
there
as
well.
So
anything
in
that
form
code
can
be
edited
there.
E
C
I
have
one
question:
is
the
form,
is
it
active
or
would
you
be
able
to
use
it
right
now?
If
I
fill
out
all
the
fields
it.
E
Check
I've
tested
it,
I've
tested
it
and
it
appears
to
work
so.
F
Yes,
once
you
submit
it,
we'll
receive
the
emails
at
the
back
end.
That's
nice.
F
F
So
far,
right
now,
my
understanding
is
once
anyone
submits
the
form.
It
will
go
to
this
golden
theme
and
to
the
auger
team
to
generate
the
graph
which
will
be
sent
to
me
and
I'll,
compile
the
report
and
we'll
submit
it.
D
A
E
Example,
reports
or
links
to
repositories
where
we
can
share
reports.
We
should
probably
it
might
be
nice
to
include
some
of
that
information
on
this
on
the
web
page
as
well.
H
I
agree
I
was
going
to
mention
something
similar,
because
I
know
we
have
a
couple
an
example
of
what
a
community
could
look
like
just
to
help
people
understand
what
they're
getting
into
and
I
and
you
mentioned
you're,
going
to
be
putting
all
of
them
on
a
github
repo.
We
might
want
to
state
that
publicly.
A
A
I'm
not
sure
do
you
think
it
would
be
like
have
the
link
on
the
where
I'm
pointing
on
the
chaos
page
that
links
to
the
github
repo.
I
mean
we're
just
going
to
use
the
repo
to
basically
drop
the
pdfs
in
because
that's
the
form
they
come
at,
but
that's
a
good
idea
to
have
it
on
the
the
website
as
well
the
link's
over.
G
A
E
If,
if
feel
free
to
create
new
markdown
files,
if
the
content
is
separate,
so
the
we,
the
the
website
is
kind
of
laid
out
in
kind
of
modules
or
components.
So
it
doesn't
all
have
to
be
in
the
same
markdown
file.
B
Okay,
sorry,
my
dog
is
playing
yeah.
So,
let's
move
on
to
the
community
handbook.
I
didn't
know
if
jaskrat
had
a
an
update
for
us,
if
not
that's
cool
too.
J
Hi
everybody
I
shared
it,
so
I'm
done
with
my
40
percent
of
the
project,
which
is
the
creating
the
handbook
and
finally,
like
we
are
done
with
the
community
bonding
period
and
this
week
we
start
with
the
official
like
the
dog
development
phase,
and
the
interesting
fact
is
that,
like
we're,
gonna
revamp
the
not
only
them
but
we're
gonna
move
our
the
existing
handbook,
which
is
located
on
the
github
towards
their
new
handbook.
J
So
I'm
gonna
write
on
a
mailing
list
about
the
things
which
we
have
done
so
far
and
how
people
can
access
or
they
can
view
the
web.
Some
like
the
handbook
and
I'm
I
I
was
like.
I
was
supposed
to
work
on
the
road
map
section
for
in
the
previous
week,
but
I
put
that
on
a
hole
after
discussing
with
the
guard,
so
I
am
working
on
the
program
initiative
which
we
participates.
J
Like
the
google
summer
of
code
outreach
and
google
season
of
talks,
I
would
be
writing
about
like
how
to
get
involved
as
a
student.
What
are
the
things
required
before
gsoc
during
gsoc
and
the
after
giza
and
similar
things
works
for
the
mentors
and
for
the
other
projects
so
well
yeah?
This
is
this
all
about,
like
I've
worked
so
far
on
the
community
handbook
and.
D
Just
want
to
say
just
scratch
has
done
a
lot
of
work,
even
during
the
community
bonding
period
already
and
moving
the
handbook
forward.
So
I'm
super
excited
for
for
our
new
handbook
and
just
grant
also
has
some
plans
for
making
some
visual
additions
to
the
to
make.
It
really
look
nice.
So.
J
Yeah
yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
god
for
adding
this.
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
few
more
things
into
this
that
I
had
a
conversation
with
the
errol
fox,
who
is
one
of
the
great
designer
in
the
working
in
the
open
source
ecosystem
and
she
I'm
like
they
have
agreed
to
help
in
the
community
handbook
designing
the
visualization.
So
we
would
be
connecting
on
a
call
like,
along
with
the
other
mentors,
to
discuss
on
the.
How
will
visualizations
needs
to
be
accessed
in
the
handbook.
What
are
the
requirements
for
it?
J
So
they
mentioned
that
they
would
be
available
after
the
september
17th.
That
makes
sense
like
we
have
a
lot
of
time
available
in
the
coming
time,
so
that
should
not
take
much
time
to
develop
these
things
so
yeah
like
we
would
be
discussing
ahead
like
what
things
required
and
what
visualizations
are
needed
in
the
formatting
handbook
and
based
on
those
things
we
would
be
also
taking
into
consideration
about
the
open
source
license,
as
well
as
any
other
valid
license,
which
we
need
to
put
up
for
the
visualizations.
So
yeah.
A
B
D
The
support
chaos
cast,
we
have
been
partnering
with
the
code
fund,
podcast
network
and
then
codefront
shutdown
and
the
podcast
network
regrouped
as
rebase
fm.
The
problem
is
that
they
couldn't
make
it
sustainable
in
the
two
months
or
so
that
they
were
working
under
this
new
name
and
so
they're.
Shutting
down
as
of
this
week
so
on
friday
will
be
the
last
chaos
cast
episode
that
we
have
supported
through
this
group.
D
D
D
Hiring
the
same
person
who
has
been
doing
our
editing
so
far
costs
us
160
dollars
for
one
episode
to
have
the
audio
edited
and
the
show
notes
created,
and
we
think
it's
worth
the
money
we
just
have
to
find
the
money.
So
now
the
question
is:
how
can
we
have
enough
money
to
pay
for
the
podcast,
and
so,
if
you're,
looking
in
the
show
notes,
I
put
in
a
proposal
for
reaching
out
to
our.
D
All
of
the
people
who
are
very
fond
of
chaos
to
ask
if
they
have
any
money
that
they
can
give
to
chaos
to
sponsor
the
podcast,
and
we
have
I
I'm
proposing
for
sponsorship
levels
with
different
levels
of
perks.
For
that.
A
So
one
of
my
comments
is
whenever
I
listen
to
a
podcast,
so,
for
example
like
when
I
listen
to
the
one
that
don
was
on
yesterday
there,
a
lot
of
the
sponsors
are
companies.
I've
never
heard
of,
and
I
actually
do
go
check
them
out
so,
but
I
think,
like
one
was,
I
don't
know,
is
it
a
company
that
helps
with
community
management,
maybe
kind
of
forget
what
it
was
but
like?
How
do
we
f?
Who
are?
How
do
we
find
those
like
who
are
those
people?
K
I
think
part
of
part
of
it
is
if
you,
if
you
listen
to
a
lot
of
podcasts,
you
start
to
kind
of
see
the
same
advertisers
over
and
over
on
a
lot
of
the
tech
podcasts.
K
So
we
could
conceivably
reach
out
to
to
some
of
those
companies,
but
I
you
know,
I
think
in
general
it
tends
to
be
companies
that
are
sort
of
in
the
same
space
right,
so
companies
that
are
doing
something
that's
in
some
way
related
to
open
source
project,
health,
open
source,
metrics
and
right
now
there
are
a
few
of
those
and
we
tend
to
tap
them
for
sponsorships
for
other
things
and
they're
small
companies
without
a
lot
of
money.
So
I'm
not
we're
in
kind
of
a
bind.
I
agree
with
that.
K
D
E
We
want
to
maybe
combine
the
efforts
with
chaos
con
the
other,
the
other
place
that
we
try
to
collect
money,
maybe
combine
the
efforts
so
that
we're
maybe
raising
money
for
chaos
con
and
the
chaos
cast
at
the
same
time
or
talking
to
the
same
people.
Maybe.
D
If
we
created
a
sponsor
prospectus,
we
have
one
for
chaos
con,
so
we
could
add
a
page
for
the
podcast
and
then
we
could
even
add
a
third
page
for
our
outreachy
mentorship.
K
L
L
Well,
a
podcast
is
helpful,
but
I'm
thinking
something
more
conversational.
You
know
last
year
and
in
fosdem
we
got
a
lot
of
open
source,
scientific
software.
Folks-
and
you
know
it's
it's
some
way
of
opening
the
community
like.
Maybe
maybe
we
could
do
it
with
some
of
the
technology
projects,
like
maybe
augur,
could
do
a
a
hackathon
like
an
open
hackathon
for
a
day
or
something
like
that.
L
Just
to
see
people
getting
engaged.
Maybe
a
working
group
could
do
something
similar
to
try
to
sort
of
overview
what
the
project
is
and
press
out
a
couple
of
metrics
that
folks
are
interested
in.
So
I'm
thinking
some
along
the
lines
of
some
kind
of
more
lightweight
synchronous,
small
scale,
sub
event
like
not
that's
not
the
kind
of
thing
where
we'd
have
all
people
in
one
place,
but
it
would
draw
smaller
crowds
to
specific
niches.
C
I
like
the
idea
of
a
hackathon
a
lot
I
when
I
was
looking
for
jobs
and
internships
early
on.
I
was
going
to
a
lot
of
hackathons
and
events
like
that
and
I
I
there's
a
big
difference
between
a
hackathon,
that's
trying
to
get
contributions
from
people
and
a
hackathon,
that's
trying
to
engage
people,
and
I
think
that
distinction
also
needs
to
be
made.
If
we
do
something
like
that,.
K
C
I
do
want
to
step
back
for
a
second,
I
have
a
recommendation
for
the
sponsorship
tiers
that
we
have.
It
looks
like
they're
geared
towards
towards
organizations,
and
that
makes
sense.
I
also
would
recommend
having
some
sort
of
sponsorship
or
like
individual
contribution
kind
of
levels
as
well,
because
I've
individually
contributed
to
this
kind
of
stuff
and-
and
I
I
just
think
that
it
would
be
good
to
have
that
in
a
structured
way.
K
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
even
just
even
just
something
simple
like
you
know,
kind
of
like
what
pete?
Would
they
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
podcasts
use
patreon
for
for
something
like
this,
where
people
can
contribute
just
tiny
amounts
to
to
give
something
back
for
something
that
they
enjoy?
Listening
to.
C
I've
also
seen
sponsor
an
episode
or
like
by
episode
level
sponsorship
tiers
as
well,
which
is
something
that
just
I'm
throwing
out
there
too.
L
L
B
I
I
like
those
also
those
levels
matt
and
georg.
I
also
think
you
know
if
an
open
source
project
wanted
to
put
a
you
know
sponsor
one
or
something
like.
I
think
that
would
be
a
potential.
K
Too,
it
would
also
be
worth
asking
the
linux
foundation
for
their
suggestions.
If
there
are
people
that
they
know
who
would
sponsor
something
like
this
or
people
that
might
be
interested.
A
D
Now
that's
a
good
idea.
So
if
you
go
to
the
minutes,
I
added
a
personal
level
and
episode
level
and
then
we
can
have
a
month
level.
E
D
E
Perhaps
we
could
have
some
sort
of
concerted
chaos,
effort
or
a
group
that
was
focused
on
sponsorship,
as
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
have
the
podcast
people
trying
to
raise
money
and
then
outreachy
we're
trying
to
raise
money
for
that
separately.
It
just
it
kind
of.
B
I
like
that
idea
too,
but
I
I
do
think
we
should
keep
the
podcast
and
anything
else
separate,
because
I
I
think,
that's,
I
think,
more
effective
to
say:
oh
yeah,
here's
the
podcast
like
it's
its
own
little
thing,
and
then
we
also
have
this
other
thing.
And
then
this
other
thing.
But
I
don't.
I
think
if
you
put
it
all
on
one
giant
prospectus,
I
think
it's
just
going
to
get
unwieldy,
but
I
do
absolutely
agree
that
we
could
have
people
that
just
focus
on
on
fundraising
in
general.
F
B
A
So
let
me
well,
let
me
think
about
this
too.
I
think
the
chaos
project
is
also
in
a
unique
position
that
we
do
have
an
opportunity
for
grant.
Funding
support
has
has
played
out
well
in
this
project
in
the
past,
so
we
may
also
think
I'm
I'm
a
little
with
john.
I
don't
real,
always
like
reaching
out
to
the
same
people.
I
think
we
need
to
be
very
conscious
of
that.
A
And
then
just
another
small
note
right
we're
still
working
out.
There's
a
there
was
a
issue
minor
issue
with
community
bridge
funding
that
we're
hoping
to
get
resolved.
So
if
you
look
at
some
of
the
transactions,
there
were
some
funds
that
were
kind
of
moved
away
from
the
chaos
project
and
we're
hoping.
A
D
L
A
B
Okay,
let's
move
on
so
the
next
one,
so
sean
and
matt,
and
I
were
just
chatting
and
we
were
talking
about
the
vision
of
open
source
in
general,
and
so
we
just
wanted
to
and
I'll
let
sean
and
matt
jump
in
here
as
well.
But
we
just
wanted
to
kind
of
get
your
all's
thoughts
and
and
opinions
about
where,
where
you
think
open
source
is
going
or
where
would
you
like
it
to
be
in
five
years?
It's.
B
I
know
it's
hard
to
kind
of
envision
anything
right
now,
because
the
world
is
extremely
ambiguous
and
uncertain,
but
just
wanted
to
kind
of
throw
that
out
there
and
and
see
what
what
people's
thoughts
were
and
matt
and
sean.
If
you
have
anything
to
add.
L
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
this
is
a
broad
question,
so,
right
now
we're
focused
on
our
own
open
source
projects,
the
metrics
for
them.
What
do
do
we
have
a?
Do?
We
have
a
collective
vision
or
idea
of
what
open
source
like
in
general,
like
the
big
open
source
umbrella
may
look
like
in
five
years
and
how
it
would
be
just
distinct
or
different
than
it
is
today.
H
I
feel
like
there's
many
possible
arms
of
this
conversation,
so
I'll
just
throw
out
the
first
thing
that
comes
to
mind,
which
is
the
move
away
from
software
as
the
focus
of
open
source,
and
that
I
think
even
this
project
is
an
example
where
you
can
use
an
open
source,
like
collaboration
model,
to
talk
about
something
that
isn't
software,
we're
talking
about
metrics
and
yeah
hardware,
that's
emerging
more
in
terms
of
open
search,
hardware,
projects
and
communities,
and
I
have
started
to
see
more
open
source
like
communities
emerging
around
shared
interests
and
shared
topics
that
aren't
necessarily
explicitly
called
open
source,
but
could
learn
and
benefit
from,
say.
L
G
So,
okay,
where
I
would
love
to
see
open
source
ecosystem
in
five
years,
is
being
open
to
beginners
because
that's
like
it's
like
a
struggle,
so
a
beginner
completely
new
to
tech.
So
I'll
give
a
scenario.
G
So,
sometime
last
two
months,
I
saw
an
open
source
project
and
I
wanted
to
contribute
to
the
project
and
on
one
of
the
issues,
I
think
someone
was
finding
it
very
difficult
to
understand
the
issue
and
one
of
the
maintainers
actually
actually
made
the
comment
and
said
this
project,
or
this
issue
is
open
to
beginners
in
open
source
are
not
beginners
in
tech,
so
it
was
really
very,
very
upsetting
because
I
I
have
had
issues
where
I've
struggled
to
contribute
to
a
project,
because
I
I
I'm
just
starting
out
in
tech
and
I've
also
had
similar
stories.
G
I
had
similar
stories
from
friends,
so
one
thing
I
would
love
to
see
in
the
open
source
space
is
for
every
project
to
be
beginner
friendly,
not
just
to
someone
new
in
open
source,
but
to
everyone
that
is
new
in
tech.
Just
even
even
though
you
just
wrote
it
does
all
the
code.
The
code
you
just
written
in
that
point
or
just
hello
world
at
least
I
can
contribute
to
that
project
as
a
beginner,
because
it's
actually
really
a
pain
point
and
for
for
most
projects
or
for
some
projects
I've
come
across.
G
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
they
try
to
implement
that
by
creating
issues
where,
if
a
beginner
stumbles
on
your
project,
I
I
should
feel
welcome
at
first
or
coming
into
the
community.
I
should
feel
welcome,
saying
hello.
I
should
feel
welcome
in
the
meetings
if
you're
saying
something
technical,
you
should
also
consider
that
some
someone,
someone
out
there
listening
to
you-
might
just
be
hearing
this
for
the
first
time.
So,
even
as
I
try
to
say
the
technical
stuff,
I
said.
G
M
I
mean
just
to
add
on
to
like
your
previous
comments.
Is
I
mean
even
in
open
source
software?
I
think
too
much
of
the
focus
has
been
on
software
itself
in
the
code,
so
other
contributions
just
sort
of
get
ignored
or
not
even
measured.
M
Those
things
are
like
harder
to
measure,
and
then
you
know
people
making
those
contributions,
sort
of
get
ignored
or
or
not
recognized
adequately,
and
I
you
know,
I
think,
like
I've,
seen
a
lot
of
like
companies
that
are
getting
started.
I
talked
to
just
one
yesterday
in
san
francisco
they're
that
are
trying
to
look
at
measuring
roi,
and
you
know
in
in
like
non-code
activities,
which
is
good
to
see.
M
I
I
think
a
lot
of
it
is
still
manual,
but
I
think
all
of
us
has
to
sort
of
move
away
from
just
looking
at
only
like
what's
happening
with
the
code
in
the
repos.
K
I
feel
like
kubernetes
is
a
good
example
of
a
project,
that's
starting
to
move
in
this
direction
that
others
can
kind
of
model
it.
On
I
mean
we
have
loads
of
programs
for
for
newcomers.
They're
also,
you
know,
issues
are
tagged
good
first
issues
and
we've
tried
to
actually
move
a
lot
of
the
traditional
work.
K
That's
not
usually
done
in
the
repos
to
github,
so
things
like
event
organization
and
a
lot
of
those
things
have
been
trying
to
put
into
the
repos
into
github
so
that
it
starts
getting
tracked
and
measured
and
showing
up
in
the
you
know
showing
up
in
dev
stats.
So
I
would,
I
would
love
to
see
more
open
source
projects
kind
of
take
the
direction
that
kubernetes
has
had
with
this
like
trying
to
be
really
friendly
to
newcomers
and
trying
to
really
help
mentor
people,
and
I
would
love
to
see
more
projects,
do
that.
I
I
That's
also
a
contribution
that
is
really
easy
to
overlook,
but
it's
also
really
important
to
build
local
communities
as
well
and
making
sure
that
people
are
aware
who
are
the
others
in
their
areas
and
and
these
kind
of
things,
the
other
area,
where
we
also
try
to
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
is,
for
example,
translations
like
translating
the
documentation
into
various
languages
and
that's
also
an
area
where
the
contributions
are
really
valuable
and
again
has
practically
almost
nothing
to
do
with
the
code
itself.
I
So
there
are,
there
are
really
a
lot
of
good
examples.
I'm
not
sure
that
we
can
automate
everything
in
terms
of
metrics
and
and
measuring
all
this
like.
I
know
that
there
are
a
couple
of
communities
doing,
for
example,
contributor
awards
periodically
and
that's
practically
human
input
to
recognize
contributors,
code
contributors
or
non-code
contributors.
It
really
doesn't
matter,
but
those
people
who
are
putting
a
lot
of
work
into
their
contributions,
and
they
are
not
recognized-
and
I
think,
probably
the
best
way
to
recognize
these
people
will
remain
based
on
human
input.
K
The
other
trend
that
I
think
we've
been
we've
already
been
seeing
this
over
a
number
of
years,
but
I
see
it
sort
of
increasing
in
intensity
is
the
corporate
involvement
in
open
source
and
more
people
actually
getting
paid
to
do
the
work
that
they're
doing
within
open
source
projects.
So
companies
sponsoring
people
to
to
you
know
to
do
a
lot
of
the
work
within
open
source
projects,
and
with
that
I
think
the
other
piece
of
that
is.
K
You
know
these
companies
coming
together
and
working
together
in
in
big
foundations
and
donating
projects
or
contributing
projects
to
like
the
cncf
and
the
linux
foundation.
I
know
we
do
a
lot
of
that
at
vmware
when
we
get
projects
that
have,
you
know,
reached
some
sort
of
critical
mass
with
other
other
participants
from
other
companies.
We
end
up
donating
them
to
two
foundations,
so
we
can
continue
to
to
grow
that
and
I
think
I
think
that
kind
of
corporate
aspect
of
open
sources
is
continuing
to
increase
and
accelerate.
D
And
one
of
the
things
that
I
know
is
an
ongoing
conversation
is
the
sustainability
of
open
source
projects
in
the
ecosystem
as
a
whole.
What
don
was
just
talking
about
with
companies
being
involved
that
just
increased
the
stakes,
but
it's
a
conversation
that
is
ongoing
and
I
don't
know
where
we
will
land
on
that.
A
L
A
Can
we
get
but
like
okay,
so
it's
a
bit
overwhelming
sure,
but
like
could
we
look
at
the
health
of
that
like?
Is
that
even
like,
if
we
just
look
at
a
project
by
project,
are
we
looking
at
the
health
of
a
project
kind
of
like
by
only
looking
at
the
pinky
of
a
person
right
like
we
need
to
understand
the
entirety
of
how
this
project
is
positioned
within
an
ecosystem,
to
truly
understand
its
health?
We
can
understand
it
highly
localized,
but
it's.
L
J
L
A
L
G
L
B
One
thing
I
think
that's
interesting
to
look
at
is
the
the
social
good
that
comes
with
open
source
and
like
making
sure
that
that
piece
doesn't
ever
get
lost.
If
you
know
corporate
is
is
doing
more,
and
more
like
is,
is
that
a
piece
of
open
source
that
is
beautiful
and
wonderful
and
magical?
That's
going
to
get
lost
in
the
in
the
fray,
because
nobody
like
there's
not
really
money
in
that
and
so
like
that.
That
is
something
that
I
would
want
to
keep
an
eye
on.
B
Personally,
you
know,
like
my
personal
feeling,
is
that
it
should
be
a
balance.
It
should
be
a
diverse
landscape
of
different
types
of
open
source
projects,
just
like
it
should
be
a
diverse
landscape
of
contributors
of
of
all
from
everywhere,
and
so,
like.
I
don't
know
how
you
measure
that
piece,
but
that
is
something
that
I'm.
D
At
the
state
of
the
source
last
week
there
were
three
other
things
that
I
took
away.
One
was
patents,
that's
a
still
ongoing
conversation
or
danger
that
is
looming
over
software
patents,
specifically
one
toby
langell
had
mentioned
a
constituency
hierarchy
who
are
we
actually
building
foreign?
Who
is
our
our
ideal
person
that
we're
building
for
working
with
and
the
third
one
is
the
corporate
engagement
that
we
already
talked
about.
B
So,
looking
at
the
time,
sadly,
we
are
out
of
time
and
we
did
not
get
to
everything
on
our
agenda.
Apologies
for
that-
and
I
know
this
was
kind
of
a
big
conversation.
If
people
have
further
thoughts,
matt
shaw:
do
you
think
they
should
email
or
what
would
you
recommend?
Should
we
put
something
to
the
mailing
list
or
would.
B
Cool
okay,
yeah:
let's
do
that
and
then
we
will
get
to
attribution
and
hacktoberfest
next
time
is
that
okay,
whoever
put
those
on
the
agenda
is
that
all
right,
okay,
octoberfest,
I
think
we'll
start
in
october.
Obviously
so
I
think
we'll
have
time
next
week
to
talk
about
that.