►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Weekly Community Call 3-1-22
Description
Links to minutes from this meeting are on https://chaoss.community/participate.
A
Call
there's
a
couple
of
risk
calls
that
start
20
minutes
in
because
I
forgot
to
hit
the
record
button.
B
After
all,
the
good
stuff
yeah
all
right
well
welcome
to
march
1st
hooray,
we've
made
it
through
two
months
already
of
2022.,
so
good
for
us
community
call
we,
we
are
here
same
time
same
place
every
week
and
the
minutes
have
been
dropped
in
the
chat,
but
if
you
need
them
again,
just
give
us
a
shout.
If
you
wanna,
of
course
put
your
name
down
under
attendees
you
can
you
do
not
have
to
do
that
and,
as
always,
you
do
not
have
to
turn
your
camera
on.
We
don't
care
here.
B
It's
casual
we're
just
gonna,
hang
out
and
chat
about
chaos
stuff
for
a
little
bit,
so
you
can
check
your
email,
it's
totally
fine.
We
don't
care
it's
multitasking
and
I'm
actually
envious
that
you
can
do
that,
because
I
cannot
so
good
for
you
anyway.
B
B
B
B
I'm
always
afraid,
I'm
not
going
to
see
the
chat
there.
We
go
yeah.
Now
I
see
it.
Okay
first
thing
on
the
agenda
is
probably
our
biggest
topic.
Maybe
I
don't
know.
Maybe
not
metrics
freeze
started
so
it
starts
today.
I
guess
so.
For
those
who
are
new
to
chaos,
what
we
do
is
twice
a
year.
B
We
release
a
group
of
metrics
together
that
we've
developed
either
new
or
if
we've
revised
any,
we
lump
them
all
together
when
we
put
them
out
there
as
an
official
release
to
say
these
are
metrics
now
that
you
can
use
and
run
with
and
have
fun
with,
so
that
time
is
now
before
we
do
that
release.
We
have
a
30-day
public
comment
period
where
anybody
they
don't
necessarily
even
have
to
be
in
chaos.
B
Community
officially
can
just
comment
on
some
of
these,
some
of
our
or
any
of
our
metrics
that
we
have
as
candidate
releases
release
candidates
releasing
yeah
release
candidates,
so
that
period
starts
technically
today,
the
month
of
month
of
march
and
then
we'll
end
that
and
then
we'll
package
everything
up
and
put
it
out
in
a
nice
little
pdf.
B
That
is
beautiful.
They
will
be
added
to
this
website
here.
I
don't
think
they're
there
quite
yet,
but
they
will
be
because
that
literally
is
just
happening
like
right
now,
so
give
us
give
us
a
little,
but
there'll
be
a
little
tag
and
a
link
to
where
you
can
provide
feedback
for
that
metric.
D
E
There's
one
I'm
working
on
right
now
in
evolution
like
it's
done,
the
pr
just
needs
to
be
merged,
and
then
I
have
to
get
it
in
the
translations
repo.
So
there's
it's
that's
kind
of
where
this
other
one
is
don
that
you're
referring
to
like
it.
The
it
just
needs
to
be
made
into
a
pr
you
know,
and
then
the
issue
updated
for
episodic
contributors.
Okay-
and
I
honestly
I
can
do
that
today-
I
have
time
after
this
meeting.
F
So
I
I
was
going
to
pull
these
to
the
website
today,
so
I've
been
making
a
list
and
double
checking
that
everything
is
where
it
needs
to
be,
but
I
am
going
to
I'm
actually
I'm
going
to
give
you
to
the
end
of
the
day
till
I
do
that
so
I'll
I'll
pull
these
to
the
website
tomorrow,
that'd.
A
Be
good,
thank
you
yeah.
Let
me
know
if
evolution
I
mean
banad
did
evolution
and
risk
and
I
think
he
did
one
other
one.
C
I
did
for
the
value
also.
A
F
Yeah,
the
the
the
metrics
release
is
in
the
working
group
repositories.
All
look
pretty
good.
We
are
missing
a
few
metrics
in
the
translations,
repo
though
so,
if
you
haven't,
if
you
haven't,
pulled
those
into
the
translations
repo,
yet
please
do
so.
G
F
B
All
right
thanks
everybody,
we
have
a
nice
little
group.
I'm
surprised
how
many
metrics
we
are
going
to
have
because
all
things
considered
because
we
had
like
the
end
of
year
break
and
we're
also
reviewing
old
metrics,
and
we
also
have
some
operational
stuff.
We've
been
working
on
so
there's
other
things
and
we're
still
cranking
them
out
so
good.
For
us,
everybody
should
be
proud.
E
I
guess
I
have
this
like
just
kind
of
ongoing
concern
when
we
get
to
a
release.
Now
is
we
we
just
have
a
lot
of
metrics
and
the
balance
between
releasing
new
metrics
and
reviewing
old
metrics
like,
and
this
seems
to
be
widening
every
time,
and
that
does
cause
me
stress,
and
I
know
that
we're
supposed
to
be
releasing
metrics,
obviously
as
a
chaos
working
group,
but
that
just
stresses
me
out
a
little
bit.
F
I
I
agree
with
that
and
by
I
think
there
are.
There
ends
up
being
a
kind
of
a
gulf
in
the
language
that's
used
in
the
older
metrics
versus
the
newer
metrics,
because
we're
not
reviewing
them.
So
it
kind
of
gets
to
a
point
where,
like
some
of
those
older
metrics,
I
don't
have
a.
I
don't
have
a
whole
lot
of
trust
in
some
of
the
older
metrics,
because
we
haven't
reviewed
them
so.
B
G
E
Yes,
I
think
we
need
to
do
something
and
I
think
we
might
even
need
to
think
about
like
what
reevaluation
process
looks
like
so
like
if
it's
a
metric
from
you
know
when
we
first
started
right
now,
it's
a
fairly
heavy
weight
process.
If
there
are
substantial
changes
to
it,
it's
basically
the
same
as
a
a
new
release
of
a
metric,
which
you
know.
That's
I
don't
know,
maybe
something
in
between
of
a
full
review,
but
not
just
a
all
looks
good.
H
I
was
gonna
say
I
feel
like
I
would
be
open
to
like
more
of
a
structured,
focused
time
on
only
reviews,
because
I
think
in
the
risk
working
group
we
had
kind
of
realized.
We
were
coming
up
to
a
release
and
it's
sort
of
like
we
want
to
spend
our
time
on
this
metric
that
we're
developing
or
do
we
want
to
spend
some
time
looking
at
our
old
metrics.
H
F
B
I
think
that's
the
sentiment
across
working
groups,
at
least
the
ones
I've
seen
like
where
it's
yeah
it's
on
the
list.
But
then
there's
also
this
other
thing
that
we
have
to
talk
about,
and
we
want
to
finish
and
would
it
would
it
make
sense
to
have
maybe
a
small
group
of
people
that
kind
of
do
the
first
pass
of
these
and
then
submit
that
to
the
working
group.
E
E
A
E
A
E
B
F
A
A
F
I
was
just
going
to
volunteer
my
assistance
on
that
task
if,
if
matt
and
elizabeth
would
would
like
it
so
I
have
a
I
have.
I
think
I
have
a
fair,
a
high
level
of
knowledge
about
all
of
the
metrics
and
together
and
possibly
how
they
kind
of
relate
together.
So
I
can,
I
can
usually
tell
when
a
metric
needs
to
reference
another
metric
or,
if
we're
dealing
with
similar
topics
in
metrics,
for
example,
welcome
kevin.
I
So
are
we
going
to
add
something
like
I
was
thinking
a
column
on
the
spreadsheet
for
every
every
list?
That
just
says,
like
last
review
on
something
like
that.
F
Yeah
there
is
a
there's,
a
version
date
or
a
review
date
that
is
part
of
the
metrics
template.
Now.
B
Okay,
yeah
the
metrics
template
and
then,
but
what
you're
saying
matt
is
to
put
it
in
the
spreadsheet
also
of
date
of
last
review.
G
B
F
All
right,
the
spreadsheet's,
a
planning
document,
so
I
think
it's,
it's
completely
fair-
to
add
dates
to
the
planning
document
to
help
us
figure
out
when
we
need
to
review
them
again
or.
B
Okay,
cool:
let's
go
ahead
and
move
on
because
we
do
have
some
other
things
to
discuss.
So
if
y'all
don't
care.
A
I
think
we've
discussed
this
enough.
Okay,.
B
Sounds
good
okay,
so,
in
the
dei
badging
team
we
are
gonna,
have
a
virtual
dei
badging
celebration
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
We
want
to
first
off
just
acknowledge
and
celebrate
our
reviewers
who
volunteer
their
time
to
review
incoming
applications
for
a
dei
event
badge,
and
we
also
it's
the
two-year
anniversary
of
it.
So
we
just
want
to
celebrate
and
bring
everybody
together
and
hang
out.
So
we
have
a
doodle
poll.
If
you
don't
mind
filling
this
out
at
your
convenience,
we
would
love
to
have
you
there.
B
We
are
a
little
bit
limited
on
the
time
frames
only
because
we're
also
trying
to
work
out
what
works
best
for
the
reviewers
themselves.
So
if
you
can't
make
any
of
those,
I'm
really
sorry,
but
we
love
you
anyway,
and
we
would
still
like
it
if
you
could
come
so
yeah
thank
you
and
by
the
end
of
the
week,
if
you
can
do
that,
that
would
be
great
okay.
Next
one
g-stock
ideas,
we
did
get
the
last
day
sean
for
those.
Yes,.
A
No
well,
we
got
an
email
from
google
that
we
hadn't
put
many
projects
up
there
yet
over
the
weekend
and
they
needed
them
by
the
end
of
the
day.
Yesterday,
so,
okay,
we
made
sure
that
happened
and
we
will
get.
B
A
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah-
I
they
wanted
them
so
that
they
could
review
our
application
as
an
organization,
so
presumably
adding
some
now
feels
wrong.
F
Do
the
do
the
micro
tasks
need
to
be
completed
at
this
time
or
micro.
A
Testing
the
ideas,
so
at
this
time
I
I
have
micro
tasks,
the
micro
tasks
should
be
in
there.
I
don't
think
they're
going
to,
but
they
go
in
the
issue
that
you
create.
So
you
can
just
edit
the
text
of
the
issue
and
there
are,
if
you
look
at
the
other
ones
that
are
in
there,
I
think
they
all
have
microtasks
associated
with
them,
and
you
could
just
look
at
the
example.
The
the
micro
tasks
are
usually
fairly
straightforward
for
the
website
knowledge
base
one.
F
Have
some
ideas
and
I've
already
created
the
issue
for
it,
and
I
put
a
link
in
the
idea,
however,
that
my
question
is
when,
when
do
we
need
to
have
those
microtasks
as
soon
as
possible,
because
google's
looking
through
our
stuff
right
now?
Okay,
so
they
that
is
needed
right
now
as
well:
okay,
yeah
yeah!
Okay!
I
will
do
that
today.
Thank
you.
A
B
H
Okay,
so
we
do
have
a
release
candidate.
I
think
we
did
have
one
very
tiny,
because
there
is
a
factual
mistake.
Coming
back
in
one
of
the
foundation
references
I
think,
there's
been
a
renaming,
so
I
believe
that
was
submitted
as
well
as
we
had
a
new
metric.
H
H
Yeah
and
the
more
that
we've
discussed
this
metric,
the
more
that,
I
think
it
would
be
a
nice
combination
or
should
be
involved
in
the
metrics
models
discussion,
because
just
looking
at
something
like
defect
or
bug,
resolution
time,
which,
in
our
case
we're
rephrasing
the
metric
as
sort
of
a
a
responsiveness
element
like
if
you're
working
with
the
project
are
they
being
responsive
to
bugs
and
fixing
them,
which
is
a
good
sign
of
whether
or
not
the
project
is
more
less
stable
or
more
or
less
risky
for
your
organization.
H
A
real
number.
I
don't
know
if
I
started
being
a
phrase
because
it's
often
like
you
can
fabricate
numbers
out
of
anything
and
so
the
more
we
discussed
it.
We
were
like
hey.
This
would
potentially
be
a
good
fit
for
our
metrics
model.
So
I
know
I
haven't
really
been
involved
in
this
conversation,
but.
A
Yeah,
it
is
yeah,
the
metric
is,
we
specified,
it
is
very,
oh,
it
has
to
be
interpreted
and
somebody
in
a
project
has
to
determine
when
what
is
the?
What
is
the
birth
of
a
defect
from
the
perspective
of
the
project,
and
we
discussed
that
at
length
and
it's
when
the
project
is
made
aware
of
it
through
some
kind
of
issue
or
notification.
H
Yeah,
because
because
there
could
be
multiple
disclosures
that
happen,
but
if
they
don't
happen
to
the
project
directly,
then
there's
no
there's
nothing
to
track
it
against.
So
it's
really
when
the
issue
becomes
aware
to
them
and
how
quickly
those
things
are
addressed.
So
that's
been
consuming
the
last
couple
of
meetings
that
we've
had.
So
I
don't.
A
B
Okay,
number
five:
I.
E
Had
a
question:
I'm
sorry,
I
was
looking
at
something,
but
where
are
you
all
at
with
the
dependency
work
right
now,
because
I'm
thinking
about
how
that
might
kind
of
roll
over
into
the
metrics
model
stuff
we've
released.
A
Three
dependency-based
metrics
that
I
think
we
collectively
consider
the
core.
There
are
more
on
our
agenda,
but
I
think
we
viewed
them
as
less
critical
than
the
initial
three
that
we
released
and
auger
has
those
three
implemented.
E
There's
just
there's
always
kind
of
this
discussion
about
like
thinking
about
the
larger
position
that
a
project
sits
in
and
dependencies
seemed
like
they
would
sort
of
play
an
important
role
in
that
increasingly.
Yes,
that's
all.
H
You
just
sorry
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
left
turn.
Did
you
see
the
census
report
that
came
out
of
the
lf
this
week.
H
So
they're
the
more
I
look
at
the
more
I
want
to
dig
into
the
methodology
they
used
to
attribute
a
value
or
z-score
to
the
individual
packages,
but
they
basically
try
to
create
a
standard
approach
to
assess
the
overall
value
usage
of
the
package
and
prominent
package
ecosystems
and
hosting
sources.
So
it's
it
potentially
it's
the
most
like
it's
most
comprehensive
report
like
that
that
I've
seen
at
an
industry
level
versus
by
a
company
or
by
a
specific
product
or
project
area.
H
So
sorry,
I'm
bringing
it
up,
because
I
think,
if
we're
talking
about
this
in
terms
of
metrics
models,
then
we
are
going
to
have
to
take
the
bigger
view
of
it
and
how
how
it's
not
just
identifying
dependencies
is
what
you
do
with
that
information
and,
in
their
case,
they're
prescribing
a
value
or
a
level
of
importance
on
things
that
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
see.
If
we
could,
I
don't
say,
borrow
their
methodology
but
like
investigate
whether
or
not
it
would
make
any
sense
for
our
own
context.
H
Maybe
we
can
tap
on
kate
in
the
risk
working
group,
given
that
we
haven't,
we
have
an
insider
who
worked
on
this
with
kate
and
david
wheeler,
so
the
risk
working
group
can
take
that
on.
But
I'd
be
I'd,
be
interested
to
see
if
that's
applicable
at
all,
to
what
you're,
what
you're
trying
to
accomplish
matt.
D
Sorry
that
report
the
url,
makes
it
look
like
that's
from
2020.
A
Yeah
because
because
yeah,
I'm
being
thanked
for
generating
reports
that
I
did
for
the
first
report,
it
does
say
of
course,
census
two
vulnerabilities
in
the
core,
but
this
looks
like
it's
from
this
is
like
the
link
seems
to
be
sorry.
Let
me
let
me
there's
no
date
on.
It
is
the
thing,
so
you
can't
really.
D
H
D
G
B
H
Thanks
everybody
putting
dates
on
things
don,
I
agree
with
you
they.
I
don't
know
why.
But
research
reports
don't
put
dates
on
things,
because
I
think,
there's
probably
a
fair
amount
of
delay
to
like
when
you
write
it
to
when
things
actually
get
published
in
what
spaces,
but
like
you
should
state
your
work.
B
A
B
Okay,
thank
you
guys
for
volunteering.
For
that
number
six
is
we
want
to
make
sure
people
know
that
we
are
going
to
try
to
do
a
chaos
con
in
conjunction
with
osseu,
which
is
september
13th
to
16th
in
ireland.
B
B
E
D
A
A
B
Okay,
so
it's
mostly
just
to
like
put
that
in
like
plant
that
little
seed
in
everybody's
brain
that
that's
gonna
be
trying
to
happen.
So,
okay,
let's
move
on,
we
got
a
little
bit
of
time.
Left
quick
update.
She
code,
africa,
they
have
their
own
mentorship
program
called
contribute,
contribute
on.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
saying
that
right,
but
we
are
we
did
submit
for
that.
We
have
an
idea
about
doing
a
newcomer
bot
in
our
newcomer
channel.
B
That
would
welcome
people
that
come
into
the
channel
and
give
them
resources
right
off
of
that,
because
right
now
a
lot
of
that's
just
manual.
So
we
want
to
try
to
streamline
that
process
a
little
bit.
So
we
will
let
you
all
know
if
we
get
accepted
into
that
and
we
have
multi
multi
mentors
for
that,
since
none
of
us
could
do
it
full
time.
There's
four
of
us
that
are
going
to
split
the
mentorship
on
that,
which
is
is
good.
I
think
it'll
work
out
great,
so
that'll
be
good.
B
B
A
B
About
it
again,
it
did
resurface
in
I
believe
it
was
the
asia
pacific
call
is
that
right.
B
Correct
we
were
just
talking
about
mailing
lists
and
etc,
etc,
and
this
came
up
as
a
way
to
kind
of
help
with
newcomers
and
the
the
wide
variety
of
places
where
information
is
found
so-
and
this
is
a
little
more
sustainable
and
because
no
that's
not
the
right
word,
it
saves
the
data
a
little
better.
It's
a
little
easier
to
find
information
than
searching
through
a
mailing
list,
archives
or
slack
conversations
that
go
away
because
we
don't
have
the
pro
level
slack.
Ours
will
get
deleted,
eventually,
so
yeah.
D
Do
we
think
I
can
restate
my
position
on
forums
and
mailing
lists?
I
I
actually
have
no
strong
preference
either
way,
but
we,
I
think
we
have
to
pick
one.
We
can't
have
a
forum
and
because
what
happens
is
you
have
mailing
list
people,
and
then
you
have
foreign
people
and
you
just
end
up
with
two
parallel
conversations
on
similar
topics
and
then
the
two
never
never
actually
meet
as
an
old
person
who
does
a
lot
of
email,
though
I
would
like
a
forum
that
has
email
integration
in
case.
We
need
that.
D
But
last
time,
last
time
we
had
this
discussion
in
the
big
meeting.
I
think
that
there
were
enough
people
that
felt
strongly
about
the
mailing
keeping
the
mailing
list,
that
we
decided
not
to
go
with
the
forum,
but
I
do
think
forums
in
general
are
kind
of
more
accessible.
It
gives
people
more
options,
maybe
maybe
it's
time
to
make
that
make
it.
D
A
Easier
yeah,
I
agree
with
you
don
it
and
I
think
the
discussion
forums
have
the
advantage
of
being
archival
and
let
people
find
old
discussions
so
we're
not
repeating
the
same
discussions
and
I
think
we're
at
the
point
where
part
of
the
you
know,
part
of
the
things
that
I
think
we're
thinking
about
with
the
knowledge
base.
Part
of
that
set
of
stuff
can
probably
be
addressed
through.
A
F
So
I
think
a
a
discourse
forum
also
kind
of
works
in
a
similar
fashion
to
slack.
So
I
think
if
we,
if
we're,
if
we're
gonna,
do
the
the
discourse
forum,
I
think
it's
it's
not
only
getting
rid
of
the
the
email
list.
I
think
I
think
we
should
have
a
discussion
about
getting
rid
of
slack
as
well.
F
I
don't
think-
and
I
and
I
tend
to
I
agree
with
with
everything
don
said
earlier-
having
having
too
many
platforms
is
a
transparency
issue,
so
it
it
excludes
people
from
the
from
the
discussion.
So
I
think
we
need
to
be
really
careful
when
we're
adopting
new
technology.
J
Yeah
because
I
mean
like,
if
you
know
I
I
don't
know
if
a
lot
of
people
will
complain
if
we
just
like,
for
example,
just
shut
it
down,
and
I
mean
I
so
I
guess
that
would
be
my
preference.
J
If
you
know
I
I'm
a
big
fan
of
the
forums
in
general,
like
whatever
the
platform
is,
if
there
aren't
gonna,
be
too
many
complaints
about
the
mailing
list,
I
mean
I,
I
do
see
the
emails,
but
I
rarely
read
them
because
I
I
get
the
same
information
on
slack
or
somewhere
else
at
this
meeting
and-
and
I
slightly
disagree
on
slack
versus
like
forum,
I
think
they're
slightly
different
slightly
different
conversations
happen.
I
think
slack
or
I
mean
those
chat
like
platforms
is
more
for
real-time
conversations.
J
I
think
it's
more
social,
whereas,
like
the
forums
and
mailing
lists,
are
more
for
asynchronous
communication.
D
D
A
And
I
would
add
that
if
somebody
posts
the
mailing
list,
if
we
take
away
the
mailing
list
right
now,
I
don't
think
anyone's
going
to
notice
honestly
and
if
we
took
away
slack
right
now,
I
think
the
community
would
break
because
it's
where
all
the
communication
is
happening
right
now
I
mean
we
slowly
will
redirect
it
toward
the
forum,
but
I
don't
think
you
can
take
slack
away,
but
you
can't,
I
think
we
can't
take
the
mailing
list
away
because
it's
it's
at
this
point.
I
think
fairly
non-essential.
J
G
E
B
F
So
so
maybe
a
chat
integration
is
is
what
we
would
do
there.
I.
A
D
D
J
That
broadcast
like
something's,
been
posted
on
discourse.
I
mean
that's
I've
seen
that,
but
I
I
don't
know
kevin
if
you're
thinking
of
something
different
but.
A
This
yeah
posting
slack
to
a
discussion
forum
like
a
lot
of
times.
I'm
just
answering
quick
questions
that
don't
have
context.
I
don't
know
if
I
want
that.
I
don't
know.
If
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
if
I
want
my
slack
conversations
archived
because
I'm
not
sure
they're
as
helpful
as
a
discussion
forum.
What
could
just
be
a
channel
that
you.
C
A
A
J
Thing
I
do
in
my
community
is,
if
I
see
a
conversation
and
slack
that's
worth
saving
into
the
knowledge
base,
I'll
export
it
to
this
course
hey.
This
is
a
recipe,
good
recipe
that
somebody
found,
and
I
I
happen
to
run
across
in
slack.
J
So
it
allows
me
to
sort
of
export
it
and
and
and
keep
that
conversation,
but
yeah
I
mean
so
that's
definitely
doable
it's
a
little
clunky,
but
it's
actually
kind
of
cool.
E
J
To
right,
yeah,
but
I've
seen
like
some
communities,
I
mean
I
I
think
it's
a
little
noisy,
like
somebody
posted
a
question
on
this
course.
It's
a
reminder
for
somebody
to
go,
go
answer
it
or
respond
to
it,
but
I
gotcha
yeah,
that's
that's
a
little
noisy
but
exporting
like
the
conversation
you
want
to
preserve.
In
slack
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
actually
kind
of
cool.
I
use
it
like
I.
I
would
export
like
a
one
thread
a
week,
for
example,
that
I
find
interesting.
A
A
Okay
and
if
we
wanna
experiment
with
it,
we
just
have
to
ask
the
lf.
A
E
E
B
A
D
Could
keep
the
primary
mailing
list
and
flip
it
over
to
announcements
only
so
that
only
a
handful
of
people
can
post
to
it
and
we
could
use
it
to
post
like
just
big
announcements,
and
that
gives
us
an
email
channel
for
for
that,
like
here's,
our
new
metrics
release,
yep.
A
A
A
I
opened
up
and
I
would
need
the
dns
entry
for
us
to
play
with,
but
yeah.
If
we
want
to
go
this
way-
and
I
I
do
think
just
it's
not
infrastructure,
we
want
to
maintain
in
terms
of
updating
discourse
as
an
open
source
project
on
a
server
and
all
that
I
think,
even
at
100
a
month,
it's
a
deal
to
not
have
the
headache
of
administering
it
yeah.
I
agree
just
have
a
credit
card
ready
or
yeah.
They
ask
you
for
that
on
the
free
trial,
so
yeah,
but
yeah
I'll
go
back.
A
A
D
The
way
it's
worded,
though,
I'm
not
sure
if
so
so,
what
it
says
is
if
you're
legally
recognized
as
a
non-profit
organization
that
is
exempt
from
federal
taxes,
we
offer
a
50
discount.
Does
that
mean
501c3,
because
I
think.
G
C
A
But
I
would
qualify
as
a
academic,
I'm
gonna
apply
for
the
discount.
B
I
B
B
B
J
D
D
D
But
I
also
think
that
we
should
clarify
with
the
linux
foundation
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
qualify
for
that
discount
and,
if
not
figure
out,
where
we're
going
to
get
the
budget
for
that
100
a
month,
and
just
do
that
due
diligence
before
we
spin
this
up
and
everybody
loves
it
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
we
can't
pay
for
it.
J
J
Yeah-
and
I
agree
with
I
agree
with
don
like
including,
like
you
know,
when
we
launched
like
what,
how
many
and
what
categories
or
or
topics
that
we're
going
to
have.
For
example,
I
think
I.
J
D
Yeah
I
mean
I've
seen
I've
seen
communities
going
too
far
in
both
directions.
So
there's
one
community
that
I
I
got
pulled
into
right
after
they'd
set
up
all
of
their
mailing
lists
and
they
set
up
like
50
mailing
lists
for
a
brand
new
project
only
only
like
three
of
them
were
ever
used
for
anything,
but
they
had
set.
G
D
They
had
set
up
mailing
lists
for
like
each
individual
sub
component
of
this
project,
and
it
was
just
a
gigantic
again,
a
gigantic
waste
and
then,
on
the
other
hand,
people
just
create
a
general
one
which
just
gets
so
full
of
stuff
that
you
can't
find
anything,
and
so
we
need.
We
just
need
to
think
about
where
we
want
to
balance
that
at
least
to
start.
F
We
may
want
to
extend
that.
We
may
want
to
extend
that
conversation
to
slack
channels
as
well,
because
we
we
have
a
lot
of
slack
channels.
A
F
J
H
J
J
B
B
G
D
B
All
right,
we
are
actually
out
of
time
over
time.
So
thanks
everybody,
great
discussions,
great
productivity,
you
can
all
take
the
rest
of
the
days
off,
you're
good.
So
thanks
everyone
and
we'll
see
you
here
same
time
same
place
next
week
sounds.