►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Community.May.7.2019
Description
CHAOSS.Community.May.7.2019
A
I'll
try
to
take
minutes
today
because
today,
I
actually
plan
on
doing
less
talking
on
the
monthly
ones,
so
I'll
just
try
to
facilitate
things.
So
why
don't?
We
start
with
some
working
group
updates
and
kind
of
looking
across
the
board
as
to
who's
here
Sean,
you
can
update
us
on
like
three
different
working
groups:
yeah
I
can
up
the
dates.
Everything.
C
C
Of
what's
going
on,
there
sure
values
having
some
just
really
talking
a
lot.
That
notes
are
available
in
that
in
front
of
me
right
this
second,
but
it
was.
It
was
Andy
and
I
on
the
call
last
week,
I
think
it
was
a.
It
was
a
light
week
and
much
we've
got
like
five
or
four
or
five
people
there,
most
most
meetings
and
we've
been
talking
about
getting
the
other,
a
collection
of
repositories
that
we
would
then
run
augur.
D
C
And
then
slowly
begin
to
add
value,
metrics
and
honor,
and
we
run
some
back
so
I've
done
a
bunch
of
what
I
think
are
valued
metrics
using
lion,
counting
code
complexity,
and
it's
these
things
like
that
we
did
labor
the
labor
side
of
you
know.
How
much
would
you
approximate
if
invested
in
different
projects-
and
you
know
there's
some
anomalies-
that
we
encounter
your
example.
Anything
that
imports
a
JavaScript
library
looks
super
hard.
C
But
if
you
look
at
the
Java,
you
just
have
to
learn
what
to
exclude
from
the
effort
some
of
the
what
are
the
repos
you're
running
against
you
know,
I've
run
I've
run
against.
I
mean
I
have
a
list
of
like
8,000,
oh
four,
posit
or
ease
that
I've
run
stuff
against,
but
you're
not
going
to
list
them
off
here.
No,
the
what
what
I
knew
JavaScript
was
completely
whack
is
when
I
told
me
it
would
cost
nine
million
dollars
in
five
years,
forty
people
to
build
auger.
So
this
is
okay.
Yes,
yeah!
C
A
C
A
C
Okay
risk
is
clearly
defined
goals.
Question
metrics
framework.
The
two
focus
areas
identified
right
now:
our
labor
investment,
and
this
that's.
What
I've
been
talking
most
about
I,
see
okay
to
get
one's
head
around.
The
second
focus
area
is
living
wage
and
that's
trying
to
do
some
more
labor
market
estimation,
kinds
of
work
and
I
think
thankful,
run.
I.
Think
we'll
have
serve
we're,
probably
going
to
get
data
for
those
things
in
very
different
kinds
of
places
than
we
usually.
D
C
You
know
my
I've
done
some
stuff
with
the
Census
and
the
Bureau
of
Labor,
Statistics
and
prior
lives,
working
with
computational,
anthropologists
and
so
I
think
these
kinds
of
publicly
available
data
will
play
a
role
in
understanding.
What
is
the
living
wage?
What
are
the
job
opportunities
are
a
potential
average
salary
commercial,
offering
okay.
A
C
C
A
A
C
E
A
C
C
Because
I
don't
have
them
memorized,
but
the
five
focus
areas
under
risk.
Our
business
risk,
which
is,
is
this
project
gonna
be
around
so
that
I
can
support
it.
That's
kind
of
on
the
consumption
side
of
open
source,
okay,
whole
quality
is
a
production
side
question.
You
know
how
we
go
for
quality,
licensing,
security
and
transparency.
So
licensing
is,
like
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
file
scanners
and
a
lot
of
interest
around
licensing.
C
C
Yes,
okay
and
the
badging
community
I
think
Kaos
can
provide
potentially
automated
metrics
or
clarified
metric
definitions
that
that
are
useful
to
particular
industries,
especially
safety,
critical
industries.
You
know
part
of
Linux
ecosystem
yeah,
the
badging
process,
actually
with
projects
that
have
badged
themselves,
we
can
pull
from
an
API
and
actually
show
the
badging
for
those
projects
and
tools
like
author
or
lab
so
I
think
I.
C
Think
in
both
directions,
they'll
be
value-added
and
I
think
an
idea
that
came
up
yesterday,
that's
I,
think
will
pursue
with
honor,
is
to
actually
include
with
the
badging
data
that
we
would
put
into
augur.
We
would
include
links
to
the
badging
program
so
that
if
the
project
isn't
badge,
then
it
could
go
out
and
you
know,
fill
out
the
forms
and
see
what
badging
involves
I.
Don't.
A
Know
is
everybody
on
here
familiar
with
the
CII
initiative
enough?
Okay,
so
super
super
briefly.
They
have
just
I
think
they
have
three
levels,
starting
at
top
levels,
gold
and
silver,
and
then
one
doing
a
good
job.
I
forget
the
level
of
the
first
one,
but
I
think
what
John
was
talking
about.
Is
this
this
premise
that
the
CII
program
is
gathering
a
bunch
of
data
with
respect
to
projects
anyway,
so
why
not
leverage
the
work
that
CI
is
doing
as
well,
so
I
think
that's.
C
B
Sure
I've
got
a
version
of
augur
that
I'm
working
on
for
the
prep
through
the
research
project
that
has
the
CIA
API.
It
pulls
a
little
more
information
from
it,
but
they
give
you
a
lot
of
stuff.
You
can
work
with.
Okay,
you
probably
two
hundred
lines
of
code
of
things
that
you
can.
You
can
pull
from
it,
but
most
of
what
you
only
need
is
the
is
a
status
and
we've
got
that
we
got
I've
got
a
few
pieces
of
code
available
that
I
can
get
the
status
right
now.
B
C
B
A
A
C
Like
if
you
put
in
your
own
badging,
if
you
put
in
your
implementation
and
the
badging
happened,
you
know
have
access
to
a
database
but
I
see,
there's
there's
that
there's
privacy
risks.
Probably
our
work.
Like
that's
a
can
of
worms,
we
probably
don't
to
open
up
okay
sharing
the
database
correctly,
especially
since
there's
this
I
would
say
yes
efficient,
just
looking
at
it
and
I
looked
at
it
in
depth.
But
it's
a
it's
a
restful
api,
okay
standards
that
I'm
familiar
with,
and
it
seems
to
efficient
for
well
with
one
percent,
otter.
C
C
Else
on
the
risk
side
of
things
done,
methods
that
those
are
the
big
things
I
know,
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussions
about
security
and
you
and
I
think
those
you
know:
we're
really
kind
of
evolving
I'm.
Still
thinking
about
all
the
things
that
people
who
are
really
security,
experts
have
mentioned
and
then
trying
to
digest
them
and
think
about
what
that
might
what
things
might
be
most
useful
and
attainable
for
you
know:
definable
metrics,
okay,
if
you're
nice,
turkey.
A
D
A
F
One
question
regarding
maybe
it's
more
of
a
general
question,
but
I'm
kind
of
new
to
chaos
here,
but
a
lot
of
the
metrics
that
are
discussed
are
related
more
to
the
artifacts
or
commits
and
stuff.
Are
there
any
consideration
taken
to
you,
the
interaction
between
developers,
organizations
from
a
social
network
or
interview,
for
example,
I
mean
you
can
get
different
graph
metrics
like
networks
density
or
how
connected
everyone
is
how
if
there
are
different
hubs
of
developers,
evolving
and
so
on,
I
mean
did
these
can
be
quite
good
indicators
for
an
an
eco
systems.
C
We
are
definitely
I
mean
some
of
those
metrics
we
already
have
generated
under
the
inaugural
norm
or
lab
I.
Think
I
think
the
way
that
we
have
talked
about
it
from
a
risk
perspective
is
the
business
risk
category.
You
know
this
is
practically
around
is
that
concerned,
but
then
there
was
a
context
that
every
project
exists.
So
then-
and
sometimes
you
know
so
there's
these
are
not
I'd,
seen
more
so
than
some
other
metrics
they're,
not
a
straight
up
indicator
of
actual
risk.
C
Right
like
something
like
a
project
that
having
been
updated
in
a
year
that
that
suggests
the
community.
It's
not
paying
attention
anymore,
but
there
are
other
there's
a
big
range
between
that
and
daily
commits
right,
and
it
really
depends
a
lot
of
the
project.
How
we,
how
we
measure
that
so
I
think
giving
people
tools
that
they
can
sort
of
instruments
or
compare
with
competitive
products,
which
is
one
of
the
things
auger
does
with
its
GH
torrent
pieces,
is
give
you
the
ability
to
take
a
look
at
projects
across
across
boundaries.
F
A
F
A
Also
in
the
in
the
KS
project,
there's
a
group
right
now
called
common,
which
is
trying
to
take
a
look
at
I.
Think
they're,
looking
at
organizational
affiliation,
for
example,
is
one
of
the
key
areas
that
they're
taking
a
look
at
and
I
know
it's
not
quite
what
you're
talking
about
in
terms
of
hubs
and
brokers,
but
the
common
working
group
takes
a
look
at
that
metrics
that
might
be
applicable
to
a
number
of
different
working
groups.
A
To
your
point
of
perhaps
taking
a
look
at
social
network
analysis
is
applicable
to
risk
and
to
value
yeah
yep,
so
I'm.
You
know,
I'd
recommend
that
you
so
the
way
that
the
KS
works
right
is
that
if
people
have
something
to
bring
to
bear
and
there's
a
research
rationale
for
it
or
an
applied
rationale
for
it,
putting
these
things
into
practice
is
a
welcomed
endeavor
on
our
end.
So
if
you
I
know,
the
I
think
you've
been
in
the
risk
talks,
even
in
the
risk
meetings
with.
A
A
D
Hi,
given
that
date,
just
let
me
say
that
and
I'm
sure
meant
you're
aware
of
you,
so
that's
probably
been
participating
a
bit
more
than
I
have
I'm.
I
am
kind
of
surfacing
for
the
lesson
for
the
first
time
in
in
a
few,
in
a
few
weeks
here
and
I
kind
of
was
underwater
with
some
things
in
in
my
daily
job
so
participate
with.
It
opens
Leadership,
Summit
and
then
kind
of
kind
of
went
underwater,
but.
D
How
would
I
think
about
this
Matt
and
I'm
thinking
I'm
kind
of
organized
it
into
into
two
things?
Maybe
the
the
the
advocacy
of
what
we're
doing
with
the
group.
D
So
things
like-
and
this
is
this-
is
real
time
work
work,
so
he
organized
are
working
on
a
blog.
We
have
a
podcast
with
the
new
stack
tomorrow
and
and
then
Danielle
scared,
oh
and
I
are
and
and
Sarah
are
working
on
a
session
and
which
will
be
the
first.
The
third
day,
the
lasya
coupe
con
Club
native,
come
in
Barcelona
and
and
so
we're
we're
kind
of
in
the
throes
of
that
be
preparing
for
that
session
and
we'd
like
to
include
someone
from
the
kubernetes
community.
D
So
we've
talked
about
Paris.
We've
talked
about
Jase,
we,
you
know,
I
I
know,
can
pepper
Jonas,
you
know
a
worthless
lives,
rice
and
Janet
quo,
so
we're
we're
trying
to
figure
out
who,
who
else
to
round
out
that
session,
wait
run
in
the
nap
lighting
that
and
then
we're
also
I'm
crossing
our
fingers
at
a
session
that
we
submitted
for
open
source
summit
in
North,
America
will
be
accepted
and
and
then
a
training
participated.
Obviously,
in
cash
gone,
I'm,
guessing
script,
that
into
n
into
advocacy
and
joining.
F
A
D
In
terms
of
the
the
work
within
the
team,
that's
that's
happening
and
you
know
rely
on
Matt
for
this,
but
the
good
things
that
come
to
mind
for
me
are
news,
so
we've
updated
and
the
github
readme
for
the
group
for
the
for
the
working
group
where
we've
got
the
pilot
projects
happening
with
hyper
ledger
and
work
with
cilona
there
I
think,
but
Matt
keep
me
honest
here.
I
think
we've
identified
the
metric
for
really.
A
D
D
A
You
will
that
and
I'll
talk
about
that
at
the
end.
Okay,
this
is
great
okay,
cool,
that's
kind
of
where
I
see
things
as
well.
So
thank
you.
I
would
at
some
point,
I
don't
have
a
ton
of
information,
but
I
know
that
there's
been
some
overlap.
More
direct
overlaps
and
more
recent
overlap
with
the
DNI
working
group
and
hyper
ledger.
As
you
mentioned,
I,
don't
quite
know
like
the
details
of
that
and
I.
Don't
know
that
you
do
either
yeah
so
right.
D
A
So
I'll,
wait
and
I
know:
Gary
Bjork
might
have
a
little
bit
more
and
Sarah
might
have
a
little
bit
more,
so
I'll
try
to
touch
base
with
them,
yeah
so,
but
I
think
it
I
think
it's
moving
forward.
My
understanding
was
it's
moving
forward
in
a
positive
way
following
open
source
or
the
Leadership
Summit,
which
is
cool
yeah.
D
A
C
C
You
know
challenges
of
understanding
of
the
more
about
developers
and
doing
that
in
a
way
that
is
not
intrusive
or
innocent,
about
identity,
yeah
Howie,
who
a
sort
of
map
developers
to
organization
and
map
them
to
geography
and
all
the
different
strategies
that
we
might
try
to
do
that,
because
that
really
does
seem
to
be
the
principal
focus
of
discussion
for
that
group.
Okay,.
F
A
Just
for
heads
up
for
people,
the
common
working
group
for
a
while
notes,
they're
the
common
working
group,
was
working
in
the
metrics
repository
and
the
concern
was
is
that
that
would
create
some
confusion
as
to
what's
going
on
in
the
metrics
repository.
If
you
recall
the
metrics
repositories,
just
it's
really
just
to
capture
all
metrics
that
we
hear
about,
though
things
like
what
Johan
brought
up
earlier
can
be
captured
in
the
metrics
repository.
But
then
the
working
groups
really
distill
those
metrics
down
into
things
that
are
meaningful
for
those
areas
of
interest.
A
So
the
common
working
group
was
working
in
the
metrics
repo,
but
they
sense
decided
to
work
in
their
own
repository,
which
I
posted
in
the
minutes,
all
right,
okay,
good
and
then
last
but
not
least,
evolution
Sean
you're.
Up
again,
I
all
I
all.
C
E
E
A
C
Sure
we
are
in
the
process
of
adding
some
change.
I
guess,
there's
three
prongs
of
work
that
we're
doing
one
is
we're
continuing
to
add.
Metrics
we've
also
significantly
altered
the
user
interface
in
the
last
week,
so
that
we've
gotten
rid
of
the
working
group
organization
in
augur
because
some
of
the
working
groups
were
dead
and
that
was
kind
of
a
little
bit
cluttered
and,
as
we've
shifted
more
towards
analyzing
repositories
of
individuals
or
groups
identify
on
their
own
and
going
to
the
git
repos
ourselves.
C
We
go
have
all
the
GH
torrent
ability
to
compare
repos
that
are
in
github,
but
we
also
have
a
growing
list
of
metrics
just
generated
straight
out
of
git
repositories
and
issue
trackers
as
well.
I
think
the
look
is
cleaner
than
it's
been
before
so
so
that's
good,
then
another
thing
we're
doing
is
we've
there's
a
restful
api
that
we've
had
from
the
beginning
and
we're
basically
coming
up
with
a
more
standard
way
of
naming
everything.
C
So
now
that
chaos
has
matured,
we
have
an
idea
what
to
call
things
that
those
things
will
follow:
a
standard
hierarchy,
I
think
early
on.
We
weren't
sure,
and
so
we
did
the
best.
We
could
so
we'll
be
refactoring,
some
of
our
back-end
API
things
for
people
who
just
want
to
call
an
instance
that
it's
hosted
and
develop
their
own
visualizations
from
it
and
and
then
finally,
we
are
integrating
all
of
the
backend
storage.
C
So
right
now
we
have
github
API
calls
GH
torrent,
get
mining
tools,
code,
complexity
and
counting
tools
that
go
into
different
schema
and
you
read
those
different
schema,
so
we're
centralizing
all
of
that
into
a
common
structure
which
will
make
it'll
accomplish
two
things,
one
of
them
easier
to
understand
for
a
new
developer.
The
other
thing
is
we're
searching
the
Postgres,
so
it'll
be
more
performant
when
we,
when
we
do,
joins,
and
things
like
that,
and
the
third
thing
it
does
is
it
makes
it
a
lot
easier.
C
A
Okay,
let's
say
two
things:
one.
As
you
said,
you
had
dropped
the
working
group,
tabs
yeah.
C
Just
you
know
as
a
principle
means
of
organization.
We
still
have
evolution,
oh
no,
that's
that's
got
metrics
I
think
it
sounds
from
the
conversation
we
had
yesterday
and
talking
to
Matt
Snell
here.
Just
now,
risk
is
likely
to
reappear
very
soon,
I
see
because
if
that
is
a
separate
area
of
entertaining
value
will
also
appear,
but
but
we're
not
going
to
put
things
there.
It's
there's
nothing
behind
the
tab.
C
A
C
C
It's
actually
pretty
good,
it's
it's!
You
know
it's
all
the
different
pieces
that
we
integrate,
sometimes
I
would
say.
Experienced
developers
have
been
able
to
once
like
people
who
really
know
Python
and
the
node
stack
have
had
no
trouble
sort
of
getting
to
the
little
idiosyncrasies
that
we've
had.
But
we've
done,
we've
done.
Two
things
prove
this
improve
people's
experience.
Is
we
have
a
vagrant
image
that
you
can
download
and
run
now,
and
that's
so
pretty
easy
to
do
and
it
comes
with
some
sample
data.
So
you
don't
have
to
download
a
big
database.
D
C
C
C
D
C
C
If
we
still
have,
we
still
have
anaconda
in
the
instructions,
but
I've
been
doing
all
my
development
just
in
a
Python
virtual
environment
or
it's
just
fine
and
I
just
need
to
update
the
levy
to
say
that
Mary
is
ice,
a
lot,
less
pain,
it's
a
lot
more
robust
than,
and
it
kind
of
turns
out
to
be
for
this
kind
of
thing.
Okay,.
A
A
Nothing
salmon's,
okay,
so
we
had
four
students,
I
guess
be
made
offers
and
four
students
accept,
which
was
really
great.
There
are
some
introductions
going
on
on
the
chaos
board
right
now.
So,
if
you
just
want
to
say
hello,
please
do
that.
So
the
structure
is
two
of
the
students
are
working
in
the
grammar
lab
space
and
two
of
the
students
are
working
in
the
augur
space.
A
Why
don't
you
ask
for
more
and
sure
enough?
We
have
more
so
I
think
it
started.
So
I
think
this
is
really
just
the
bonding
period,
but
I
would
say
that
the
students
I
think
of
me
that
were
that
are
gonna,
be
working
on
these
projects.
They've
been
pretty
active
so
far
in
the
chaos
project
anyway,
mm-hmm
so
I,
don't
think
ain't
gonna
help
with
orientation.
I
also
think
are
you
are
we
doing
the
blog
posting
remember
last
summer,
I
think
that's
a
requirement
for.
C
A
For
those
of
you
that
are
on
the
call
start
looking
onto
the
cast
list,
some
blog
posts
just
as
to
the
work
that's
occurring
and
a
week
by
week
for
the
students,
so
that's
pretty
cool
okay.
So
that's
that
there's
a
link
in
in
the
it's.
If
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
the
names
of
the
students
or
any
of
the
organizations
and
the
students
there,
Grace
Hopper,
okay,
so
now
I'm
on
Grace,
Hopper,
so
I
think
it's
gonna
happen.
So
Grace
Hopper
is
an
event.
That's
in
October
and
there's
a
link
in
there.
A
It's
a
they
called
the
world's
largest
gathering
of
women
technologists
and
it's
in
Orlando
and
I.
Think
from
what
I
understand
they
have
a
day
prior
to
the
conference,
which
is
really
a
hands-on
workshop,
brought
forward
by
a
variety
of
different
organizations
or
communities
to
which
chaos
is
one
I've
been
talking
with
folks
at
Grace,
Hopper
they've
expressed
quite
a
bit
of
interest
in
having
chaos
participate,
and
the
only
outstanding
question
that
we
have
right
now
is
whether
somebody
from
grimore
lab
can
attend
in
October
to
help
run
a
session
for
grimore
lab
Sean.
A
C
C
A
Just
I
think
we
need
somebody
to
facilitate
write.
A
session.
I've
asked
I've
asked
for
the
learning
objectives.
You
know
as
to
what
the
hope
is
to
gain
from
the
day.
You
know
whether
its
technical
expertise
or
Community
Development,
or
you
know
what
I
mean
I'm,
not
quite
sure
what
it
is
yet
but
more
to
come
on.
That.
Does
that
make
sense,
you
don't
mean
I,
don't
know
after
four
hours
my
vehicle
thing
that
students
to
be
better
at
is
that'll,
have
a
pretty
big
impact
on
how
the
workshop
is
set
up.
A
C
A
I
know
we
have
students
here
that
do
it
and
we
have
faculty
members
here,
do
it
as
well,
so
I
would
certainly
connect
with
them.
Okay,
so
that's
great
any
questions
on
that
all
right.
So
then
I
am,
if
you
take
a
look,
you
can
all
make
fun
of
this
I.
Well,
maybe
not
make
fun
of
it,
but
give
me
feedback
so
in
the
in
the
chat.
I
put
a
link
to
the
slide
deck,
so
I
get
requests
for
having
kind
of
a
generic
slide
deck.
A
A
I
just
stopped
talking,
I
was
looking
at
something
my
brain
got
in
the
way.
So
if
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
the
slide
deck
and
provide
any
feedback,
just
feel
free
to
add
it
here,
I
just
tried
to
be
really
simple
in
terms
of
you
know
what
chaos
is
about.
Those
first
couple
slides
who's
in
the
community.
If
you
want
your
organization
listed,
that's
not
listed
there.
That's
not
a
problem
just
want
to
capture
kind
of
high-level.
A
A
A
A
Well,
I'll
leave
it
up
for
a
few
days,
and
if
people
have
comments,
that's
great
and
then
Kevin,
maybe
we
can
just
get
it
up
on
the
webpage
somewhere.
Certainly,
okay,
cool
thanks
all
right.
Let's
see
chaos
Kahn
North
America,
it's
August
20th!
We
have.
We
have
a
meeting
this
coming
Thursday
just
about
it.
The
general
it
seems
like
the
general
leaning
is
towards
having
no
fee
the
zero
dollar
registration
fee.
Again.
A
This
is
what
we've
had
in
the
past,
but
if
we
do
that,
we're
gonna
have
to
recruit
for
some
money
to
help
buy
coffee
and
snacks
and
stuff
like
that,
we
put
together
a
prospectus.
You
know
like
the
$500,
$1,000
or
support
kind
of
thing
so
anyway,
more
to
come
on
that
it
would
be
great
if
we
could
have
coffee
be
a
big
win
for
everybody
for
the
day
it
is
at
the
conference
hotel
the
same
place
as
for
some
in
North,
America
I.
Think
it's
I
think
this
has
been
here
before
that
same
hotel.
A
C
A
G
G
C
A
F
A
C
A
So
but
the
that
goals
breakdown,
so
are
we
trying
to
get
people
to
give
us
money
and
then
the
next
donation
matches
it
I've
been
confused
about
this
I
think
so?
Yes,
so
yeah!
Yes,
we're
trying
to
get
people
to
give
us
money
and
a
full
stop
and
then
second
is
I.
Do
think
the
VLF
matches
those
dollars
early
on
in
right,
the
acreage
periods
so
and
then
right
now,
if
you
take
a
look
at
that
goals
breakdown,
can
you
see
that
circle
chart?
C
A
To
make
sure
it
worked
yeah
the
other.
The
other
idea
is
that,
yes,
if
anybody
would
like
to
donate
now,
I
think
it
we
might
need
a
second
guess
there.
A
second
check,
the
save
the
words
the
idea
here
is.
We
have
I
think
we
have
seventeen
hundred
dollars
right
now
in
the
chaos
Linux
Foundation
Cass
account,
that
is
a
leftover
from
last
summer's
google
Summer
of
Code,
okay,
so
I'm
trying
to
get
that
moved
into
here.
Mm-Hmm.
E
A
Then
we'd
have
seventeen
hundred
and
five
dollars
in
here
awesome.
It
would
be
awesome
and
then
we
can.
We
can
use
that
money
like
transparently,
which
I
like
with
this
community
bridge.
So
people
can
see
that
we're
spending
it
on
things
like
coffee
and
t-shirts
or
stickers,
or
something
like
that.
You
know
I
mean
mm-hmm.
A
A
That
is
it
for
me.
Does
anybody
have
any
other
things
they'd
like
to
bring
to
the
table?
Those
are
all
the
items.
Many
items,
many
of
the
items.
Okay,
so
for
those
of
you
that
are
in
working
groups,
I
guess
I'll
just
have
one
last
parting
statement.
Please
continue
to
think
about
the
structure
of
your
repositories
around
that
goal.
Question
metric
approach.
A
Please
continue
to
think
about
the
potential
release
of
metrics
this
summer.
You
know
five
week
window
five
six
week
window
from
about
now
what
those
might
be.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
this
humongous
list
at
all
and
as
you're
doing
that,
make
sure
that
you
update
that
spreadsheet
that
I
had
sent
out
earlier
and
if
you
ever
need
that
again,
don't
hesitate
to.
Let
me
know
we're
gonna
make
my
life
easier,
all
right,
all
right.
Well,
if
everybody's
good,
I'm,
good,
yeah,
I'm
good,
also
all
right,
you
all
well
next
time,
thanks,
everybody!
Okay!