►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.AsiaPacific.Community.October.7.2020
Description
CHAOSS.AsiaPacific.Community.October.7.2020
A
I
put
the
minutes
in
here,
so
these
are
the
minutes
to
the
google
doc.
So
willem
you,
I
don't
you
can't
access
these,
but
I
came
up
with
a
couple
different
possible
solutions
for
our
friends
in
china
and
there's
a
looks
like
the
sharepoint
one
willem
can
access,
so
that
might
be
the
one
that
we
go
with
for
the
time
being
and
I'll
put
that
in
here
too,
you
can
get
to
it
from
the
link.
I
just
provided.
A
A
All
right,
so
why
don't
we
just
go
ahead
and
I'll
update
these
notes
with
all
the
stuff
at
the
top,
like
all
the
header
stuff
at
the
top,
but
for
now
we
can
just
use
these
for
the
minutes,
all
right.
So.
A
Great,
we
have
a
winner,
the
the
other
thing
that
I
had
was.
We
had
talked
about
at
the
end
of
the
last
meeting,
possibly
using
some
of
this
time
to
talk
about
inner
sourcing.
I
know
that
we
don't
want
to
just
turn
this
into
the
intersource
meeting,
but
there
does
seem
to
be
some
interest
from
folks
on
the
call
on
this
topic
and
a
few
things
really
that
just
came
up
at
the
end
were
possible.
Metrics,
I
don't
know,
can
you
see
me
highlight
things
in
sharepoint?
D
A
D
D
D
D
So
so
in
in
this
talk
is
mentioned
about
chaos,
okay,
and
I
think
there's
maybe
some
someone
already
do
these
kind
of
things,
but
we
we
may
need
to
bring
them
together
and
I
I
know
a
bunch
of
guys
in
china
they
quite
interesting
about
the
inner
source,
but
just
because
of
the
golden
week
I
cannot
get
touch
with
them,
but
I
I
will
try
my
best
to
find
them
out
and
they
may
quite
interesting
about
these
things.
D
I
think
they
are
quite
interesting
about
the
development,
the
new
new
guys
coming
to
the
project,
but
this
may
cause
some
troubles
for
the
stabilities
because
of
the
new
guys
coming
and
it
takes
time
to
make
more
people
get
familiar
with
the
the
project.
D
So
so
so
it
could
be
a
challenge
before,
but
but
but
the
magics
is
quite
useful
for
us
to
find
out
if
there's
a
new
guys
coming,
okay
and
currently
for
my
inner
source
projects,
I
I
think
is
it
could
be
a
challenge
for
them
to
bring
new
guys
in
social.
So
that
could
be
a
very
useful
matrix
and
another
things
is
we
may
we
may
need
to
know
better
about
the
project
sustainable
or
sustainability.
D
Yeah
yeah,
it's
successful
today,
yeah!
So
so
so
sometimes,
if
there's
only
one
or
two
people
work
on
this
project,
it
could
be
a
bus
factor
and
we
we
want
to
get
more
people
to
work
on
these
projects.
But
this
could
be
a
challenge
because
a
few
people
get
the
chance
to
work
on
this
project.
Because
there's,
let
me
check,
let
me
say.
D
If
there's
a
upstream
project
and
a
downstream
project-
and
sometimes
the
consumer,
the
the
provider
produced
the
software,
but
it
could
be
a
it.
D
It's
still
a
daily
job
to
maintain
this
to
maintain
the
projects
but,
but
for
the
downstream
they
may
not
have
the
responsibility
to
maintain
the
the
projects
to
to
maintain
the
upstream
projects,
so
so
it
it.
It
could
be.
D
In
my
company,
we
we
treat
the
customer
as
a
guard,
so
so
so
sometimes,
if
the
customer
not
happy
about
the
work
we've
done,
we
we
get
the
complaints
and
this
it
could
be
a
serious
compliance
and
for
in
the
inner
source
world
it
looked
like
the
downstream
project.
They
need
to
help
themselves
to
resolve
some
basic
pro
problem
problems,
but
for
the
upstream,
if
the
upstream
maintainer
did
a
lot
of
work,
they
don't
have
time
to
do
the
new
development.
D
So
so
I
think
the
the
the
workload
could
be
could
be
a
matrix
for
first
to
check
the
sustainability
of
the
projects.
A
A
Lot
about
yeah
we've
talked
a
lot
about
kind
of
upstream
dependency
and
our
concern
like
a
project's
concern
with
respect
to
upstream
yeah.
But
typically
when
we
talk
downstream,
it's
been
more
about
just
trying
to
understand
how
many
people
are
using
a
project
downstream
or
where
the
project
is
being
used
downstream.
But
I
don't
think
we've
ever
talked
about
it
from
a
maintenance
perspective
which
is.
D
F
D
Could
do
to
certify
them,
but
when
this
comes
to
the
internal
stuff
and
if
someone's
provides
a
service
for
the
others,
they
may
think
the
same
way.
But
I
think
I
read
a
lot
of
paper
about
the
inner
source.
It's
like
each
one
appear
they
they
they
should
treat
them
equally.
D
So
so
so
I
think
this
is
quite
interesting.
Yeah
it's
interesting,
but
I
I
think
I
I
need
to
let
my
colleagues
know
about.
They
should
treat
them
equally
and
try
to
help
them,
because
they
are
engineer
they
they
they
are
supposed
to
fix
by
themselves,
and
if
we
provide
enough
information,
they
should
be
do
it's
that
way.
So
so
this
is
a
new
things
for
for
me
to
convince
them.
So
I
need
to
spend
some
time
too.
G
Everyone,
this
is
daniel,
sorry
for
delay.
Hi
hi
so
well
part
of
the
discussion
we
tend
to
have
from
time
to
time.
This
is
from
a
more
customer.
Perspective
is
well.
If,
if
you
want
to
try
and
display
it
by
yourself
and
develop
this
by
yourself,
then
you
need
you
will
have
certain
downstream
costs
instead
of
directly
working
upstream.
G
So
then
you
need
to
deal
with
upstream
and
then,
once
you
have
a
new
release
cycle
or
whatever
internally,
when
you
are
delivering
or
deploying
this
internally,
you
need
to
update
your
downstream
version
by
the
name,
so
you
know
more
or
less
how
the
marklab
works.
So,
let's
imagine
that
there
is
this
new
company.
G
Creating
a
couple
of
backends
and
with
all
of
the
tool
chains,
so
the
code
for
retrieving
information
on
the
code
to
transform
the
data
and
the
code
to
visualize
everything.
So,
each
time
there
is
an
updating
remodel
up,
then
they
need
to
update,
perhaps
the
code
time
stream.
So
this
is
this
is
a
mine
demand
cost
if
this
is
part
of
the
recycled
upstream,
all
of
this
code,
and
they
don't
need
to
to
have
this
downstream
version.
Yes,
as
an
example,
so
this
is,
if
you
are
working
or
contracting
with
an
open
source
company.
D
Yeah,
sometimes
for
the
downstream
part,
it's
just
provides
a
service
for
them
and
answer
the
questions
and
even
provide
bug
fix
for
them,
but
but
this
really
time
consuming
work.
D
So
so
so
I
I
still
want
to
bring
the
innocence
ideas
to
support
for
for
products
about,
and
if
the
people's
know
better
about
the
the
project,
they
may
help
them
itself.
So
so
I
that
is
what
I
can
see
from
the
inner
source.
G
It
was,
I
was
adding
to
the
notes
as
well.
I
think
so
I
I
was
the
emcee
during
the
during
the
inner
source
comments.
So
augustine
was
the
one
talking
about
chaos,
I'm
adding
the
the
link
there
and
I'm
specifically
linking
to
the
metrics
that
he
was
discussing
about
that.
Are
software
delivery
process,
metrics
and
those
are
about
the
stability
and
so
not
your
mute.
Oh
yeah.
A
D
Oh
good,
by
the
way,
I
I
I
think
if
I
use
the
company's
computers,
I
cannot
access
the
google
doc
so
so
I
I
use
my
personal
computer,
I
I
I
I
can
access
the
google
doc
and
sharepoint.
A
G
I
should
have
access
to
this,
but
we
need
to
guess
how,
anyway.
C
G
D
Okay,
I
I
saw
two
links.
There's
youtube
links,
so
so
can
you.
G
E
D
Yeah,
so
so
so
it
it's
seen
as
a
common
virtual
summit.
I
guess.
G
G
In
asia
yeah-
and
this
is
gonna-
be
on
the
second
and
third
of
december,
so
you
are
more
than
welcome
to
submit.
D
A
This
is
interesting,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
this
raises
for
me-
and
this
is
for
the
chaos
project
a
bit
larger-
is
we're
starting
to
get
different
groups
that
have
an
interest
in
metrics
that
are
meaningful
to
their
particular
corner
of
of
the
world,
and
so,
for
example,
we've
been
having
a
talk
on
the
community
call
yesterday
about
metrics.
That
would
be
important
to
academics.
A
Let
the
dogs
in
that's
me,
the
other,
was
science
so,
for
example,
scientific,
open
source
software,
so
again
a
like
a
dashboard
or
a
panel.
That
is
at
least
helpful
in
that
regard.
It
seems,
like
inner
source
might
be
a
candidate
for
this
as
well
that
from
a
tooling
perspective
here
are
the
the
set
of
to
whatever
10
or
15
metrics.
That
can
help
provide
insight
with
respect
to
inner
source
or
with
respect
to
academe
or
with
respect
to
science.
A
A
A
D
The
the
dashboard
part
is
quite
interesting,
and
I
think
my
boss
will
quite
interesting
about
that.
Sometimes
the
manager
team
wants
to
know
what's
going
on
on
these
projects,
so
so
dashboard
is
definitely
a
very
useful
tools.
First
and
it's
he
even
we.
We
also
need
some
software
to
get
the
data
and
displays
all
the
things
on
the
dashboard.
So
it's
good
with
some
program
work
to
do.
E
A
This
is
about
like
a
process
in
the
chaos
project,
about
trying
to
build
dashboards
that
are
meaningful
to
particular
contexts.
So
in
science,
like
there's
a
there's,
a
group
of
people
who
are
doing
scientific
software
and
they
care
about
health
of
scientific
software.
So
they're
like
how
do
we
even
begin
to
look
at
these
things
like?
A
We've
never
really
thought
about
that
in
a
lot
of
detail,
and
so
the
question
was
like
do:
do
we
want
to
do
this?
You
know:
do
we
want
to
help
kind
of
foster
the
process
where
we'd
say
if
you're
an
inner
source
person,
here's
an
available,
dashboard
or
visual
of,
like
literally
like
four
to
six
metrics?
That
would
help
you
begin
to
track.
A
A
H
That's
a
good!
I
personally,
oh
go
ahead
don,
oh
no,
I
was
just
gonna
say:
that's
a
good
question.
It's
not
it's!
Not
something!
I've
thought
a
lot
about.
I
mean
I
do.
I
do
think
you're
right.
There
are
definitely
different
different
contexts
for
this.
I
think
it.
I
don't
know
that
it's
something
the
chaos
project
itself
should
necessarily
build,
but
what
we
might
want
to
do
like,
like
shawn
did
with
some
of
the
auger
notebooks
is
like
create
a
place
where
people
could
put
their
examples
based
on
their
context.
H
So
it
might
make
sense,
for
you
know,
for
this
group
or
some
people
to
do
maybe
an
inner
source
one
and
and
post
it,
but
but
that's
just
an
example
right
and
then
you
can
take
it
and
you
can
do
what
you
want
with
it,
because
I
find
that
metrics
are
so.
H
I
don't
know
the
way
I
like
to
use
metrics
is
I
like
to
tie
them
back
to
you,
know
some
sort
of
goals
or
something
I'm
trying
to
achieve,
which
means
that
the
metrics
that
I
need
are
going
to
be
different
than
the
metrics
that
anybody
else
needs,
because
my
goals
are
going
to
be
at
least
a
little
bit
different.
A
F
I
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
I
really
like
that
idea,
a
lot
of
building
more
of
a
community
and
like
enabling
others
to
create
samples
for
other
people
to
use.
One
thing
that
comes
to
mind
is
is
specifically
with
universities.
F
You
know
I
feel,
like
most
universities
are
similar
like
pretty
similar
right,
so
they
you
know,
would
want
to
to
have
the
same
kind
of
things
available
so
like
one
person
at
a
university
could
do
that.
I
think
that
my
and
I
I
really
think
that
we
should
have
a
role
in
this
somewhere
because
I
feel
like
that
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
kind
of
show
our
value
in
a
deeper
way
of
just
you
know,
besides
just
putting
the
metrics
out
there.
Well
then
we're
going
to
take
it
a
step
further.
F
I
think
that
would
be
really
helpful
for
us
long
term
to
be
the
center
of
that
before
someone
else
does.
I
guess
so.
F
I
think
that
that
would
be
important,
and
I
also
just
want
to
say
I'm
not
sure
how
we
would
address
this,
but
my
only
my
only
reservation
with
doing
that
is
that,
especially
with
something
like
an
inner
source,
I
can
see
management
just
looking
at
the
numbers
and
maybe
not
maybe
not
going
deeper,
you
know
and
and
pushing
pushing
the
numbers
more
than
than
they
should,
instead
of
pushing
the
good
practices
and
behaviors
that
lead
to
those
numbers
just
because
I
I
think
that
kind
of
happens.
F
Sometimes
you
know
obviously
in
in
corporations
where
the
numbers
become
the
the
center
of
the
goal
and
not
the
actual
things
that
make
the
numbers
go.
So
that
would
be
my
only
like
we
if
we
put
those
out
there
for
from
us
as
an
official
chaos
thing
I
feel
like
we
should
put
some
kind
of
disclaimer
or
some
something
around
them
to
not.
You
know
like
make
sure
people
aren't
sabotaging
their
own
efforts
in
you
know
hopes
to
make
the
numbers
look
better
for
whatever
reason
so.
G
That's
a
very
good
point,
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
I've
tried
to
do
at
the
inner
source
commons
when
it's
to
educate
people
about
the
use
and
avoid
misused,
metrics
and
based
on
some
of
the
topics
that
you
mentioned,
so
don't
punish
those
that
are
doing
it
in
a
different
way.
Try
to
learn,
try
to
move
them
into
a
more
you
know.
G
A
I
I
agree
listening
to
so
one
I
wrote
ethics
statement
I
think,
haven't
we
been
meaning
to
do
an
ethic
statement.
It's
at
some
point.
H
A
A
Oh
free
yeah,
okay,
so
maybe
that
should
just
be
done
at
some
point
like
maybe
I
should
just
I'll
take
that
on
and
at
least
like
offer
something
that
we
can
workshop
off
of,
because
this
this
needs
to
be
done,
and
then
I
think
daniel.
Your
point
was
not
necessarily
around
ethics,
but
around
maybe
best.
I
don't
like
that
term,
but
practices
that
people
could
use
with
respect
to
the
metrics.
A
Just
here
are
some
some
ways
to
think
about
them,
which
is
great,
and
then
I
I
started
wondering
about
you
know
how
we
have
the
community
health
reports.
A
A
Health,
I'm
not
saying
that,
but
that
would
be
hard.
That
would
be
impossible.
We
don't
have
the
ability
to
do
that,
but
the
health
reports,
so
the
community
health
reports
right
they're
a
way
for
us
to
basically
just
say:
listen
if
you're
running
an
open
source
community,
here's
here's
four
metrics
that
we
think
might
help
kind
of
locate
you
a
little
bit
better
with
understanding
the
health
of
open
source
and
open
source
project
undefined.
We
just
kind
of
say
you
you,
we
don't
really
care
what
it
is,
it's
very,
very
generic,
but
what?
A
You
know
what
people
think
about
that,
because
we
do
have
a
program.
That's
kind
of
doing
this
at
a
very
generic
level
with
the
community
health
reports,
and
this
would
be-
and
this
wouldn't
be
maintained
by
sean
or
people
like
grimora
lab.
This
would
just
be
like
a
one-time
notebook
thing,
and
people
could
to
duns
point
even
contribute
back
if
they
have
modified
their
notebook
in
such
a
way
that
they
would
like
to
share
it
with
others.
B
F
C
A
The
folks
at
gramor
lab
they
there
is
a
the
panel
a
page
for
panels
daniel
I
I
don't
know.
I
can
never
remember
that,
but
I
don't
think
it's
categorized
like
this.
G
It's
it's
it's
more
small
focus,
perhaps
by
data
source,
okay,
and
then
we
have
the
concept
of
like
cycle
of
repositories
and
then
you
can
use
that
concept
of
like
cycle
of
repositories
or
activity
in
any
environment.
A
B
We
we
have
other
notebooks
that
we
haven't
made.
I
guess
where
I
would
use
it
as
easily
accessible
to
everyone,
so
the
notebooks
that
we
have
in
the
community
reports
just
run.
They
just
work
the
other
ones.
We
have
to
do
some
credential
normalization
and
parameterization
on
the
actual
reports,
and
we
are
working
on
that,
but
we're
trying
not
to
release
things
that
that
don't
just
work
out
of
the
box,
because
we
don't
want
to
support
that.
G
Yeah
so,
for
instance,
the
second
example
is
about
contributors
growth.
So
this
is
a
panel
which
is
a
dashboard
that
is
focused
on
understanding
the
growth
of
the
contributors
in
any
data
source.
You
are
tracking,
so
if
this
is
open
source
you
can
think
of,
I
don't
know
adoption
of
a
technology
or
similar
stuff,
perhaps
impact
of
certain
actions
that
you
are
having
from
an
inner
source
perspective.
This
panel
might
be
interesting
about
how
your
collaboration
or
inner.
G
A
G
G
A
Sure
that
I
don't
know
so
I
mean
from
the
sounds
of
it.
A
B
Yeah,
but
they
don't,
they
don't
show
up.
I
don't
have
a
nice.
I
guess
this
is
with
github
pages
daniel's
built
this,
so
I'm
not
showing
the
examples.
The
examples
of
what
those
notebooks
output
I
can
also
put
put
in
here.
G
I'm
thinking
that
perhaps
if
you
want
to
bring
some
more
to
be
more
attractive
to
others,
maybe
we
can
try
to
go
to
the
inner
source
commons
and
trying
to
have
at
all
around.
F
G
Universe,
commons,
but
at
the
inner
source
commons,
if
we
bring
the
we
open
the
discussion
about
hey,
we've,
we've
been
discussing
this
internally
and
these
are
based
on
the
attendees
that
we
have
in
this
meeting.
These
are
the
metrics
that
we
are
interested
in
for
this
aspect
or
not
collaboration
or
communication,
or
anything
else,
and
we've
been
working
in
this
set
of
panels.
So
we
have
open
branch
or
a
leg
or
a
specific
area
to
work
on
all
metrics.
G
G
I
think
I
even
indeed
mentioned
that
chaos
is
seen
in
somehow
or
will
be
seen
in
the
future
as
a
standard
in
the
industry
or
for
this
type
of
metric.
So
we
are
in
a
good
position
now
to
say:
oh,
this
is
what
chaos
thinks
or
so
what
do
you
think?
Do
you
want
to
improve
this
come
to
chaos?
Then
we
can
improve
the
metrics
or
not
some
more.
B
Cool,
so
maybe
the
I
guess
these
are
google
docs
that
I
shared,
so
maybe
I
should
export
them
somehow
here.
A
So,
as
an
action
item,
maybe
is
to
kind
of
wrangle
these
thoughts
down
into
a
couple
things
one
is
we
have
to.
I
think
gonna
lay
the
land
on
what
we
even
have
available
right
now.
A
G
That
you
would
think
so
there,
so
we
have
keynotes,
probably
we
don't
fit
there,
then
regular
sessions,
20
minutes
or
15
minutes
and
then
community
sessions
of
10
minutes.
G
A
Okay,
I
just
in
my-
I
suppose
I
should
be
typing
this
on,
but
I
put
like
listening
like
how
we
would
propose
to
to
listen
to
the
conversation
around
inner
source
or
listen
to
the
conversation
around
ospos
or
listen
to
the
conversation
like.
We
probably
need
to
think
about
that.
B
A
Work,
okay
and
then
the
other
thing
that
I
think
we
would
need
to
kind
of
think
about
in
the
chaos
project
is
like
a
process
by
which
we
would
make
these
available
to
people
and
by
which
people
could
contribute.
A
All
right
cool
do
any
other.
Do
people
have
thoughts
on
this?
I'm
it
seems
to
be.
I
mean
this
is
something
we
could
talk
about
in
the
community.
Call
too
other
other
thoughts.
I
have
lay
get
lay
of
the
land
like
available
resources.
How
do
we
set
up
listening
and
then
how
do
we
set
up
a
process
to
discover
what's
available
and
also
contribute.
A
Yeah,
I'm
not
I'm
not
entirely
sure
yet
I
don't
know
hold
that
hold
that
question
I
don't
like.
The
hope
is,
is
that
we
can
do
this
within
the
existing
meeting
structures
or
out
of
band.
I
think
we're
approaching
max
capacity
on
the
number
of
meetings
that
we
can
have
in
the
chaos
project.
A
So
I'm
not
sure,
but
I,
my
guess,
is
there'll
be
a
lot
of
people
that
are
interested
in
this
and
kind
of.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
assemble
kind
of
a
low
bar
of
metrics?
That
kind
of
orient
different
groups
is
to
provide
insight
on
the
things
they
care
about,
for
example,
like
willem
you
had
mentioned,
like
bus
factor
you
had
mentioned
new
contributors
like
these
may
be
inner
source
inner
source
things.
A
G
You
know
what
they
have
in
mind
is
if
it
makes
sense,
maybe
as
a
proposal
is
so
there
are
a
couple
of,
we
are
working
at
the
inner
source
commons
with
the
concept
of
pattern,
I
share
a
couple
of
links
in
as
an
example
of
what
the
pattern
is,
and
so
there's
one
about
introducing
metrics
in
inner
source,
and
there
is
another
one
related
to
maturity
model.
G
Patterns
is
kind
of
the
way
we
are
kind
of
having
these
high-level
concept
discussions,
so
we
may
add
other
patterns
that
are
kind
of
more
related
to
metrics.
So
if
we
work
in
both
in
both
worlds,
we
can
define
metrics
here
in
chaos.
As
I
know,
we
measure
collaboration
in
these
five
ways.
I
don't
know
whatever,
and
then
we
can
try
to
create
a
pattern
at
the
inner
source
commands
as
measuring
collaboration.
So
then
we
link
to
the
work
done
in
chaos
and
even
the
technology
that
we
have
in
chaos.
G
If,
if
it's
possible,
because
in
inner
sorts
common,
we
are
not
initially
having
any
type
of
technology
or
we
are,
we
are.
This
is
not
one
of
the
goals.
The
goal
is
about.
It's
train
and
educate
people
from
the
use
of
inner
source
and
adoption
of
inner
source
good
practices,
so
this
might
be
a
good
way
to
cross-reference
both
communities.
G
G
So
mindset
that's
a
problem,
so
then
there
is
a
pattern
to
deal
with
this.
So
there
is
a
problem
statement.
There
are
forces
against
and
in
favor
of
the
chains
there
is
a
context
and
then
there
is
a
solution
and
then
this
solution
might
be
might
have
worked
in
certain
organizations.
So,
depending
on
the
pattern,
you
will
see
like
a
list
of
organizations
where
this
has
successfully
been
applied.
G
So
the
pattern
is,
I
have
the
problem
of
I'm
trying
to
measure
collaboration,
but
I
don't
know
how.
So
we
have
a
problem.
F
A
So
you
develop
a
pattern
and
then
the
pattern
is
based
on
a
problem
that
you're
trying
to
solve
whether
it's
an
inner
source,
whether
it's
in
an
ospo,
whether
it's
in
and
then
in
the
case
of
the
inner
circle,
yep
right
and
then
from
that
pattern.
G
F
G
A
A
G
A
Okay,
so
it's
a
a
bit
like
action,
research
kind
of
thing,
so
you
have
this
problem
and
you
have
an
action
that
you
take
and
then
the
idea
is
that
you
measure
the
results
you
can
measure
before.
Obviously,
what
does
collaboration
look
like
in
this
case
before
you
take
an
action,
and
what
does
it
look
like?
After
all,
right.
G
A
A
They
already
using
what
a
what
a
panel
or
say
a
jupiter
notebook
that
would
be
the
set
of
metrics
to
measure
the
impact
of
a
particular
action.
So
you
would
say:
here's
here's
the
pattern
or
here's
the
yeah,
the
pattern,
here's
the
associated
notebook
or
panel
that
you
should
probably
be
tracking
with
respect
to
collaboration.
G
A
Yeah,
no,
I
like
it
because
it
it
localizes
it
a
little
bit
to
it.
It
kind
of
grounds
the
metrics
to
something
to
some
some
action.
So,
okay,
well
we're
at
the
end
we're
at
the
end.
A
Bunch
of
things
to
think
about
here
this
is
super
interesting,
all
right
well
till
next
time,
hopefully
by
next
time
I
can
kind
of
come
to
the
group
with
maybe
some
some
proposals
as
to
what
this
could
look
like,
not
just
for
inner
source
but
but
others
as
well.
So,
and
maybe
else
would
you
all
be
interested
to
solicit
topics
for
the
next
agenda
item?
I
had
a
few
and
we
kind
of
got
on
this.