►
Description
December 11, 2017 COTW Policy and Personnel Committee Meeting
A
All
right
so
one
two
three:
we
have
a
quorum,
so
we're
going
to
call
the
policy
and
personal
item
committee
meeting
to
order.
The
first
item
before
us
is:
if
you
guys
will
remember-
and
it
was
back
in
September-
this
was
brought
forward.
I
I
wasn't
actually
at
the
meeting
where
the
issue
occurred
and
based
on
members
wanting
to
call
in
and
Natalie's
brilliant
keeping
us
from
getting
into
trouble.
I
thought
we
should
create
a
policy.
We
had
that
conversation
and
it
never
went
anywhere.
C
C
D
D
C
It's
me.
It's
in
papers,
person
point
that
somebody
benefits
you,
okay,
we
don't
know
who
made
the
determination.
Rather,
the
reason
is
acceptable
and
you
might
say:
well
you
only
got
a
scratch
on
your
food
he's
not
going
to
talk
to
for
that
today.
You
could
have
still
gonna
come
in
or
you
know
you
mister
for
toothache,
oh,
you
had
a
headache
or
your
sister
was
ill.
It
doesn't
say
who
determines?
A
A
A
Telling
you
that
you
tabled
it
Natalie
brought
this
back
to
me
and
we
didn't
vote
it
down
and
she
Stanley
brought
it
back
and
said
this
has
been
sitting
here.
What
do
we
do
with
it
and
I
said
what
we
do
is
we
ask
the
board
what
they
want
to
have
happen?
Do
you
want
to
vote
it
down?
Do
you
want
to
move
it
forward
so.
D
So,
if
cancer,
your
question
the
way
I
would
read.
This
is,
if
you,
if
you
24
hours
ahead
of
time,
send
notice
and
say
I've
got
a
medical
emergency.
My
toes
broken
whatever
it
might
be.
There's
not
an
interpretation
of
that
you,
you
know.
If
those
reasons
are
for
exceptional
circumstances,
it
shouldn't
just
be
hey.
I
want
to
come
to
the
meeting
today,
that's
not
an
acceptable
circumstance,
but
if
you,
if
it
needs
one
of
these
reasons,
why
you
can't
there's
nobody
saying
yesterday
so.
C
So
so,
what's
the
point
of
it
is
what
you
probably
making
is
we
make
any
policy
that
doesn't
say
who
enforces
that
policy?
In
other
words,
it
can't
these
identified
the
group
on
a
person
that
identifies
and
enforces
Department
City.
We
just
can't
have
a
policy
on
the
books.
I
didn't
know,
one
couldn't
stay
in
the
spirit
of
it
right.
A
A
C
C
A
C
D
D
A
A
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
C
E
A
B
I
know
I
know
what
he's
asking
and
I
would
disagree
with
it,
because
the
whole
purpose
of
having
hearing
officer
supposed
to
avoid
the
situation
where
people
ask
for
the
Appeals
we
get
bogged
down
with
everything
they
don't
get
hurt.
They
get
paid
for
years
at
a
time
and
time
and
time
and
we
then
they
never
get
any
resolution.
My
brother,
it
just
be
heard
by
hearing
officer
with
appeal
to
us
or
whatever
it
may
be,
or
the
gnarly
stuff
we
blessed
that.
E
A
A
The
language
is,
we
have
to
select
whether
we're
going
to
use
hearing
officers
or
not
and
then
go
to
it.
So
Reverend
Collins
is
asking
that
we
add
as
a
priority,
that
we
ask
the
legislation
to
amend
this
law
to
allow
this
staff
person
to
decide
if
they
want
to
hear
it
by
a
board
or
an
arbitrator,
Reverend
Mack.
So.
B
F
A
I
can
answer
your
concerns.
They
don't
exist
in
legislation.
The
way
the
law
is
written
is
that
we
decide.
They
never
said
that
boards
must
use
soap,
so
your
issue
doesn't
require
anything
to
do
with
legislative
delegation.
It
is
something
that's
afford
you
could
bring
forward,
so
the
board
approves.
A
So
get
the
people
and
put
it
or
get
with
whoever
the
policy
person
is
going
to
be,
and
let's
get
that
on
there.
But
today
the
question
that
Reverend
Collins
is
bringing
is
directly
related
to
having
to
ask
the
legislature
to
consider
so.
Reverend
Collins
wants
to
add
to
the
list
of
legislative
priorities
that
the
law
be
amended
to
allow
the
state
to
have
the
staff
person
decide
if
they
want
to
board
the
board
or
the
hearing
officer
to
hear
it.
Is
that
what
you're
asking
Reverend
move?
E
E
E
C
Yes,
would
you
say
that
a
while
ago,
and
which
I
respect
your
PIN,
you
know
a
lot
of
things
yeah,
but
but
I've
been
in
a
lot
of
teach,
Appeals
and
anchors,
which
is
what
you
get
on.
Writing.
It's
not
the
spirit
of
what
took
place.
In
most
cases,
you
you'll
be
amazed.
How
far
is
differently
you,
given
the
other
side
in
the
hearing
officer,
will
be
given
a
30
minute
30
minute
preview.
C
C
C
They
wanted
to
fire
goddess
counselor,
but
not
being
actually
in
the
exact
room,
the
whole
time
the
person.
She
was
right
next
to
a
scientist
on
it
to
a
good
assistant
to
do
interview
and
there
was
a
fire,
the
principal
the
reason
it
was
a
silly
and
there,
but
on
paper
they
had
destroyed
the
person,
but
I
stopped
there.
So
so
he
get
the
benefit
of
knowing
else.
If
you
have
to
turn
into
none.