►
From YouTube: July 16, 2018 CCSD Board of Trustees Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
B
C
B
Don't
put
them
onto
the
fence
potential
consent
thanks
Julie,
okay.
So
the
motion
which
was
made
by
Cindy
and
seconded
by
mr.
Miller,
is
the
adoption
of
the
agenda
and
the
consent
agenda
items
which
we
just
said:
eight
a
one
and
two
and
see
the
advocacy
letter,
an
approval
of
the
June
11th
special
call
board
meeting
minutes
and
the
June
25th
board
meeting
minute.
So
we
have
a
motion
from
Cindy
and
a
second
for
Michael
and.
B
C
B
B
B
F
Any
consideration
to
the
close,
the
Frank
Dillane
for
school,
such
as
dealing
the
wetlands
engineering
or
anything
consideration
to
that
that
we're
gonna
have
we
go
to
nobody
getting
into.
We
were
fully
personal
and
when
they
retired
to
it,
and
then
we
have
tightened,
if
you
find
that
the
causes
ask
astronomically
to
make
it
suitable
that
we
can't
do
it,
we're
not
getting
any
consents
with
it.
It's.
B
F
So
let
me
tell
you
why
I'm
making
it
one,
because
the
same
name
ahead
by
the
year
ago,
if
I
the
tide,
was
unreasonable
to
pursue
the
same
land.
It
turns
enough
to
turn
staff
away
from
that
land
today,
but
today
is
a
reasonable
to
fill
in
wetlands
preparation
infrastructure.
Now
it's
reasonable
I
think
the
public
is
nowise,
what's
changed
and
it
reads
what
makes
it
feasible
down
and
what
the
fees
were
then,
when
we
walked
away
from
it.
Okay,.
A
E
Right
we
made
an
obligation,
as
the
Charleston
County
school
board,
to
provide
a
high
school
or
middle
school
for
our
folks
in
northern
Mount,
Pleasant
and
d1
and
d2.
We
are
trying
to
satisfy
that
obligation
that
we
have
by
locating
property,
that's
in
that
area,
so
that
can
serve
the
children
and
families
of
those
areas.
E
We
did
as
a
school
district,
locate
property
and
it's
the
property
we're
talking
about
right
now
and
that
property
turned
out
to
be
not
optimal,
because
there
was
wetlands
on
the
property,
but
there's
still
about
50
acres
of
high
land,
just
not
in
contiguous
we've
heard
from
our
staff
that,
and
and-
and
we
did
pull
back
on
that
piece
of
property
last
year
to
allow
the
opportunity
for
staff
to
go
see
if
they
could
identify
substitute
property.
That
would
work
for
the
people
of
Mount
Pleasant.
E
You
know
and
basically
to
Shepherd
the
process
through
and
in
a
very
good
fiduciary
way.
We've
done
the
research,
the
area
up,
there
is
growing
and
the
properties
are
being
sold
and
in
a
ridiculous
fashion.
It's
just
the
things
are
just
selling
like
hotcakes.
Are
there
so
the
staff
went
out
there,
they
located
a
piece
of
property
that
would
have
been
proper
for
us,
but
it
turns
out,
as
we
heard,
that
the
seller
is
not
a
motivated
seller
and
that
it
doesn't
look
like
that
art.
E
Basically,
they
told
us
that
property
was
not
moving
forward
and
that's
that's
what
there
were
response.
They
got
back
from
the
from
the
seller.
So
now
we
are
going
back
to
parcel
number
one,
because
the
staff
has
exhausted.
What's
out
there.
I
am
fully
in
favor
of
supporting
our
staff
moving
forward
and
purchasing
the
property
so
that
we
can
live
up
to
our
obligation
to
the
people
of
D,
1
and
D
2.
A
I
wouldn't
move
forward
with
this.
If
we
hadn't
worked
with
the
Constituent
board
and
we
can't
pick
and
choose
when
we're
gonna
say
you
have
to
respect
the
constituent
boards
and
their
elected
decisions
and
then
other
times
we
say
we're
not
going
to
consider
them
and
what
they
have
said
they
wanted
in
that
decision.
I
call.
B
C
B
D
E
C
G
F
F
B
A
E
B
D
A
B
D
G
E
B
C
A
A
B
A
F
G
G
H
C
E
E
F
E
C
B
G
D
F
D
E
B
E
C
B
B
F
F
B
D
D
F
B
B
Put
the
motion
typically,
is
what
it
was
in
the
committee
of
the
whole,
please
Julie,
so
I
made
that
motion
and
thank
you
approve
the
request
to
name
the
d2
stadium
through
a
competitive
bidding
process,
with
the
distribution
of
any
revenues
for
one
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
d2
stadium
and
to
Wanda
and
Lucy
Beckham
high
schools.
Thank
you,
Michael
for
seconding
that
do
we
have
any
questions
all
right.
Mr.
Holland
shed
his
coat.
Yes
for
every
college,
no.
C
A
C
B
I
vote
yes
to
the
motion
passes.
Our
next
items
are
the
policy
and
Personnel
Committee
the
policy
items.
The
first
one
is
policy,
khc
distribution
and
posting
of
promotional
materials.
This
is
the
first
reading
of
that
policy,
which
we
discussed
in
committee
of
the
whole.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
coming.
D
E
C
A
D
B
G
C
D
C
F
F
F
D
B
H
Thank
you.
You
should
have
a
handout
at
your
tables.
It
was
there
when
you
came
in
this
evening.
It's
called
chocolate,
County,
School,
District,
Sheriff
future
shared
future
project.
This
is
really
mr.
Kennedy
John
Kennedy's
work,
but
mr.
Kennedy
couldn't
be
with
us
today.
So
I
had
said
that
I
would
try
to
pinch-hit
for
him
in.
In
a
word,
and
in
a
few
words,
what
this
project
refers
to
is
taking
the
recommendations
from
several
different
studies
but
in
particular
the
recommendations
that
are
coming
from
the
Clemson
study
and
making
sure
that
they
don't
languish.
H
Having
a
team
of
people
mediately
ready
to
bring
some
recommended
action
scenarios
back
to
the
board,
it
will
require
some
funding
to
do
that,
and
rather
than
take
any
funding
budget,
the
recommendation
is
we're
starting
this
process
by
using
the
'part,
be
make
funds
so
I'm
going
to
start
just
talking
through
each
of
these
slides
fairly
quickly.
Thank
you.
H
The
in
the
first
page,
mr.
Kennedy's,
just
sort
of
summarized
the
imperative
for
change
that
exists
here
in
Charleston,
the
richness
of
our
history
and
culture,
the
fact
that
we're
ranked
as
best
city
in
multiple
categories,
the
significant
growth
we've
had
across
sectors,
and
yet
with
all
of
this
good
news
about
Charleston
the
fact
that
our
public
schools
aren't
keeping
up
with
significant
portion
of
our
children.
H
So
we
have
a
great
success
in
a
lot
of
sectors
of
our
economy,
but
we
still
have
cycles
and
poverty
that
we're
not
able
to
break
because
our
kids
aren't
able
to
take
advantage
of
the
employment
opportunities
that
exist
in
our
area
and,
as
we
discussed
earlier
today,
that
requires
deep
change.
So
in
on
page
three,
we
talked
about
some
of
what's
occurred
within
the
school
district
to
date.
This
is
looking
back
over
the
first
three
or
so
inside
the
first,
the
past
few
years.
H
So
inside
the
school
district,
there
was
a
massive
effort
to
compile
a
strategic
plan
which
we
established.
This
year's
goals
from
we
have
a
Clemson
diversity
and
inclusion
study
which
is
coming
to
you
within
two
to
three
weeks.
We're
doing
an
analysis
of
the
school
of
designs
and
the
resource
allocations.
How
much
money
do
we
send
to
each
school
and
what
results
are
we
getting?
H
What
should
the
minimum
program
be
that
for
the
required
provided
program
for
all
kids
in
all
state
so
that
some
children
aren't
advantaged
by
getting
honors
courses
or
high
school
courses
in
middle
school,
whereas
others
don't
have
access
to
those
courses?
That's
one
of
the
equity
pieces
of
the
work,
we're
doing
the
initial
preparation
for
Phase
five,
which
will
be
the
next
building
referendum,
getting
to
really
clear
about
the
outcomes.
We
seek
measures.
The
board's
been
working
for
several
months
on
those
and
we
continue
to
refine
them.
H
The
initial
funding
that
we've
started
for
the
early
foundations,
retaining
talent
and
making
sure
that
we're
addressing
equity,
supporting
schools
more
that
have
kids
that
need
a
whole
lot
more
help
and
then
the
personalized
learning
approaches
that
are
beginning
to
occur
in
a
few
of
our
schools,
then
the
the
next
page
talks
out
what's
occurred
in
the
larger
Charleston
community.
So
mr.
H
Kennedy
talks
about
the
publication
of
the
Metro
chambers,
common
skills
and
high
demand
study,
which
makes
it
really
for
us
the
skills
our
kids
need,
as
they
enter
the
job
market
for
various
kinds
of
professions
and
careers.
The
second
study
is
that
the
k-12
pathways-
it
was
a
massive
study
that
our
state
undertook
and
the
State
Department
just
passed
this
new
layout
of
the
what
Career
Pathways
look
like.
H
We
now
know
the
cut
scores
that
students
need
to
to
qualify
for
entry
into
high
demand
fields,
and
then
we
wanted
to
to
point
out
the
publication
of
the
Avery
institutes
report
at
the
state
of
racial
disparities
in
Charleston
County.
That's
a
really
important
report
that
provides
a
lot
of
useful
information
and
recommendations
for
our
consideration.
So
we
say
all
that
to
just
say:
our
next
step
is
to
bring
all
of
these
together
and
bring
to
the
board
within
a
few
months.
H
We
are
thinking
of
getting
a
group
together
in
September,
begin
in
October
again
in
November,
taking
the
recommendations
from
the
studies
that
happened
outside
our
district
and
inside
our
district
and
bring
to
you
two
or
three
really
high
leverage
scenarios
high
leverage
actions
that
need
to
occur
through
choices
that
have
been
developed
by
community
leaders.
The
majority
of
this
community
leaders
were
suggested
by
the
Quinton
diversity
and
inclusion
team
after
they've
conducted
massive
interviews,
so
they
found
the
people
with
the
most
interest.
H
The
most
spirited
input,
the
the
greatest
willingness
to
devote
time
to
developing
some
recommendations
for
the
board's
consideration,
and
that's
really
what
the
rest
of
these
pages
talk
about,
and
they
also
introduced
this
idea
of
someone
to
help
organize
that
for
us
and
that's
the
Rios
partners,
our
iOS
partners.
Mr.
Kennedy
has
had
experience
working
with
this
group
in
his
previous
systems.
They've
worked
all
over
the
world,
including
in
South,
Africa
and
I,
can
back
that
up
a
slide
to
Rio's
partners
and
really
know
how
to
bring
powerful
recommendations
back
to
the
board.
H
So
their
approach
is
a
whole
system
team
bathed
a
facilitated
skilled
guides.
They
have
a
generative
approach,
which
means
they
absolutely
start.
As
the
next
step
next
page
indicates
it's
community
owned,
it's
not
run
with
a
bunch
of
educators,
there's
no
hidden
agenda.
It's
neutral.
These
are
honest
brokers,
that
you
would
recommend
that
people
in
the
community
would
trust
it's
an
open
and
authentic
process.
There
are
no
predetermined
outcomes.
H
It
takes
into
account
the
broad
and
varied
perspectives
that,
when
some
folks
have
heard
during
the
past
few
months
of
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
interviews,
it
takes
into
account
the
historical
precedence
and
it's
not
guaranteed
to
be
a
silver
bullet.
It
will
be
hard
work,
but
what
they
bring
back
to
us
will
be
doable.
If
you
recall,
when
we
started
this
study
with
Clemson,
we
said-
let's
not
start
it,
unless
we
intend
to
do
something,
bold
and
courageous
and
impactful
with
the
results.
So
what
are
the
stages?
H
The
first
phase
is
to
get
the
project
started,
and
that
is
coming
pretty
much
from
Clemson.
Rios
will
just
help
with
the
synthesis
of
the
perspectives.
The
concerns
of
the
questions
that
leaders
across
the
system
have
raised
in
a
very
open
and
honest
way,
phase
to
what
they
would
actually
meet
with
with
teams
of
community
representatives
to
develop
some
implementation
scenarios
and
phase
three.
They
would
bring
those
recommendations
to
the
board
for
your
consideration,
so
the
organizing
team
would
be
a
joint
group.
Mr.
H
Kennedy
would
head
that
up
with
the
Rios
folks
and
four
to
six.
Four
to
eight
people
were
enthusiastic
about
the
project.
Again,
this
isn't
education,
bureaucrats
and
some
people
call
us.
It
is
people
from
the
community
who
have
an
interest
in
education
that
board
members.
It's
an
open
and
honest
process.
The
team
with
REO
support
convenes
and
manages
relationships
with
a
larger
team.
A
scenario
team
that
do
a
lot
of
research
get
take
the
impact.
H
The
input
that
they've
received
from
Clemson
follow
up
on
some
of
the
pieces
of
the
Avery
Institute
study
and
then
bring
back
recommendations
to
the
board
so
that
we're
not
arguing
about
whether
this
particular
person's
point
of
view
is
right
or
wrong.
We
get
bogged
down
a
whole
lot
at
the
time
in
pretty
insignificant
issues.
H
We're
not
going
to
make
the
progress
that
we
need
to
make
or
implement
the
changes
that
have
to
be
made
if
we
don't
get
up
to
a
much
higher
level
of
dialogue
and
discussion.
So
that's
basically
what
this
group
of
experts
and
community
people
would
do
for
us.
The
final
team,
then,
would
be
a
group
of
about
20
to
24
people.
They
would
engage
in
three
three
day
sessions
in
September,
October
November.
The
team
would
include
those
who
are
the
most
insightful,
influential
and
interested
who
have
the
capacity
to
make
things
happen.
H
These
team
members
don't
have
to
agree
on
a
particular
point
of
view,
but
they
do
need
to
represent
all
of
the
points
of
view.
They'll
come
from
diverse
backgrounds,
positions
and
perspectives.
They'll
include
all
fastest
facets
of
diversity,
age,
gender
grade,
for
example,
students
will
be
represented
on
that
team
as
retirees
it
includes
what
Rios
called
disruptive
innovators
and
we
heard
John
we've
used
that
term
earlier
today
and
that
terms
in
the
letter
that
we
Board
approved
today,
bridging
innovators,
who
can
take
new
ideas
and
help
bridge
them
into
the
current
system
and
receptive
innovators.
H
H
We
think
that
team
needs
to
be
vet
by
people
who
know
what
they're
doing
we
will
bring
a
list
of
those
who
they
suggest
working
with
the
the
Clemson,
a
huge
Clemson
team-
that's
been
in
here
talking
to
community
leaders
about
whom
they
recommend
serve
on
this
team.
If
you
want
to
add,
if
you
want
to
talk
about
people,
you
think
are
missing,
we
can
suggest
those
names.
It
is
absolutely
as
independent
as
we
can
make
it
to
be
stakeholder
owned,
grassroots
driven
and
solution
oriented.
So
to
let
you
know
that
this
work
is
underway.
H
We
had
planned
to
present
this
along
with
the
Clemson
study,
but
because
we
need
to
get
this
work
started.
We
didn't
want
to
delay
telling
you
about
this,
because
we
need
to
start
moving
forward
contacting
some
community
people.
We
didn't
want
you
to
hear
about
that
and
wondering
what,
in
the
world
we're
doing
this,
our
attempts
to
be
ready
to
do
something
with
the
recommendations
that
come
back
from
the
Clemson
report.
So
I
know
that
you
may
have
some
questions
for
me
and
I'll
answer
them
best
I
can
in
mr.
H
A
So
a
lot
of
what
you
said,
which
is,
is
great,
but
it's
very,
very
high
level.
So
maybe
you
can
break
it
down
just
a
little
bit
for
me.
So
on
page
three
you
have
listed
or
whoever
wrote
this
has
listed
things
that
we
are
doing
within
CCSD
right.
Okay,
then
page
four
talks
about
what
has
happened
out
inside
the
later,
the
Greater
Charleston
community,
including
the
state's
mandate
for
k-12
career
pathways,
the
the
job
skills
that
are
needed
so
I
get
all
that
so
the
number
page
five.
A
What
does
it
look
like
develop
a
process
to
implement
all
of
the
existing
studies
and
strategic
initiatives?
Are
you
talking
about
system
change,
staffing,
change?
What
you
know
that
sentence
can
mean
a
lot
to
a
lot
of
different
people
and
I
don't
want
to
get
to
November
with
all
of
us,
not
not
knowing
what
you
thought
this
looked
like
when
you
set
it.
A
H
These
words,
don't
mean
staffing
change
to
me
necessarily,
but
they
do
mean
systems,
change,
recommendations
about
how
our
system
works
and
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
realistically
now
to
make
sure
that
in
five
years
we
have
accomplished
some
of
the
things
that
that
not
just
in
this
system
but
across
many
systems.
We
talk
about
and
talk
about
and
talk
about,
and
then
we
talk
about
them
some
more
in
five
years,
all.
A
C
C
H
If
it's,
what
are
our
values?
Who
most
needs
us
to
get
public
education
right
for
them?
How
does
that
particular
sieve
subsystem
of
our
system
contribute
to
the
objective
that
we
would
want
today,
regardless
of
what
the
original
objective
was.
What
is
our
objective
and
how
does
something
as
big
as
school
choice
serve
an
equity
access
and
achievement
agenda?
Okay,
but.
H
Yes
and
miss
mr.
Kennedy
is
talking
to
Rios.
Now
and-
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
he
wanted
the
board
to
know
he
he
is
in
conversation
with
them.
They
are
sending
him
some
proposals
and
I.
Don't
know
the
details
on
that.
But
I
do
know
that
when
we
talked
about
it
he
feels
as
though
I
don't
remember
the
exact
amount
that
we
get
on
the
ecard
rebate,
but
he
said
that
the
the
cost
of
this
could
easily
fall
within
that
amount
so
that
it's
not
taking
any
any
revenue
from
the
budget.
H
But
we
absolutely
don't
want
people
later
on
to
say
you
weren't,
transparent
about
this.
You
didn't
tell
us,
and
so
because
these
conversations
about
the
leaders
of
these
groups
or
who
might
help
with
the
input
need
to
get
started.
I
wanted
to
share
this
with
you
today
when
mr.
Kennedy
isn't
here,
so
that
when
he
is
here
at
your
next
meeting,
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
them
about
the
details
and.
H
A
Be
clear
so
at
some
point
mr.
Kennedy
will
give
us
an
idea
of
the
scope
of
work,
but
to
be
very
clear.
The
initiation
of
this
process
is
coming
from
the
Clemson
diversity
group,
not
not
CCSD
staff.
Creating
this
group
of
people
that
were
the
doctor,
Gil
and
his
team,
with
the
work
they've
done
in
the
community,
are
making
recommendations
for
how
to
initiate
this
project.
H
They
have
made
recommendations
to
mr.
Kennedy
mr.
Kennedy
has
begun.
He
discussed
some
of
those
recommendations
with
me,
I
think
he's
in
conversation
with
Rios
partners,
but
to
be
crystal
clear,
no
staff
member
is
selecting
the
members,
but
the
nominees
I
should
say
to
serve
on
this
group
and
that
information
will
be
brought
to
the
board.
You
will
see
it,
but
we
are
not
making
the
selections.
This
has
to
be
external,
it
has
to
be
independent,
it
has
to
be
authentic.
A
H
B
H
G
Have
a
couple
but
I
guess
I'll
just
say
that
I
think
this
is
I
think
this
is
the
kind
of
a
good
start.
I
see
some
places
where
potentially
some
good
things
could
potentially
happen.
I
guess
at
this
point
I
may
be
exercised
a
little
patience
and
and
and
see
what
types
and
what
kinds
of
recommendations
we
come
from
this,
and
if
these
things
will
drive
changes
in
our
policy
or
the
way
to
be
deliver
information
communication
to
parents
in
the
community.
G
It's
kind
of
got
me
like
all
over
the
place:
I'm
trying
not
to
go
crazy
with
it,
but
because
it
is
a
lot
to
absorb.
But
I
will
say
that
I'm
looking
for
and
I'm
hoping
as
these
steps
start
to
engage
that
the
board
is
up
to
date
or
exactly
where
they
are,
and
if
there's
things
that
we
can
come
in
and
sit
on
and
maybe
not
participate
per
se,
but
just
kind
of
be
understand.
G
G
G
H
G
H
D
G
It
layers,
though,
I,
received
the
copy
of
something
can't
remember
the
title
of
it.
I
had
a
gentleman
sent
it
to
me
and
it's
kinda
like
the
same
thing
that
Avery
instituted
and
the
same
thing
that
the
Clemson
folks
are
doing
for
us,
but
it
dates
back,
maybe
20
plus
years
or
longer
than
that
probably
40
years
and
I
think
sometimes
before
you
can
make
a
step
forward.
You
gotta
kind
of
know.
G
H
B
Anybody
have
any
questions
about
the
financial
part.
Wait
before
the
I
note.
We've
already
done
our
public
comment
time,
but
we
had
a
couple.
People
come
into
the
meeting
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
there
isn't
anybody
here
for
public
comment
that
didn't
get
a
chance
to
make
public
comment?
So
if
you
were
here
for
that,
just
spread
your
hand
or
okay
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
didn't
miss
one.
B
Okay,
if
y'all
see
on
the
end
of
the
agenda
upcoming
meetings,
the
a
July
23rd,
we're
gonna,
reschedule
that
so
that'll
be
emailed
to
us
a
date
that
will
work.
And
then
we
have
our
board
Doc's
training
on
July
26
from
three
to
five
and
then
our
August
committee
of
the
whole
on
the
thirteenth
and
board
meeting
on
the
27th
all
right
so
about
a
motion
to
adjourn
all
right.
All
right.