►
From YouTube: CCSD Audit and Finance Committee Meeting | April 5, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
What's
that,
yes,
good
afternoon,
everyone
welcome
to
the
april
2022
audit
and
finance
committee
meeting.
Hope
everyone
is
well.
I
will
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
ask
for
adoption
of
the
agent
agenda
move
approval
for
adoption
of
the
agenda.
B
A
C
A
A
Me
in
on
march,
24th
2022:
are
there
any
changes
to
the
minutes?
If
not,
I
will
ask
for
a
motion.
C
A
The
next
item
is
miss
barnett
district
9,
land
budget,
reallocation.
D
Good
afternoon,
everyone
this
is,
this
is
concerning
budget
reallocation
for
the
purchase
of
the
d9
property.
Back
in
february,
we
all
came
to
you
and
to
our
board
of
trustees
to
seek
approval,
to
negotiate
a
contract
on
a
55-acre
parcel
known
as
swigert
landing.
D
We
did
receive
approval
from
the
board
of
trustees
and
we
have
recently
negotiated
that
contract
and,
as
of
march
29th,
we
have
a
ratified
contract,
so
staff
is
recommending
reallocation
of
funding,
and
so
the
motion
is
to
approve
the
reallocation
of
funds,
as
shown
in
the
attached
resolution.
D
So
we've
got
the
d3
bus
lot,
2.1
million
dollars
is
coming
from
that
we
have
our
d1
funds
that
we
were
remaining
from
the
proceeds
that
we
used
towards
the
d1
on
doll
land
purchase.
We
had
remaining
proceeds
from
that
fund
that
we
are
requesting
use
of.
Those
are
the
two
fun
pots
that
are
being
reallocated.
D
A
D
And
we've
applied
that
also
towards
that
and
then
the
rest.
We
are
seeking
from
borrowing
from
the
ban.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Miss
barnett,
ms
costello,
the
monthly
capital
projects
report.
G
H
G
For
4.4
million
dollars,
expenditures
for
the
2023
through
2028
building
program
were
1.2
million
dollars,
capital
maintenance,
8
funding,
the
expenditures
for
275
000.
We
are
currently
wrapping
up
the
fixed
cost
of
ownership
fiscal
year
22
program
and
the
fixed
cost
of
ownership
fiscal
year.
23
program
has
commenced
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Thank
you
very
much
that
was
provided
to
us
for
information.
The
next
information
item
it
has
is
miss
carlin,
the
monthly
financial
report,
and
you
can,
I
don't
know
if
you
are
don-
are
going
to
kick
off
the
budget
process
update
okay,.
H
H
The
third
column
indicates
our
estimates
at
year
in
and
the
estimated
excuse
me.
The
estimated
revenues
that
you're
in
is
599
million.
On
the
january
update.
We
reported
our
estimated
revenues
at
year
end
at
596
million,
and
this
increase
is
due
to
a
two
million
dollar
increase
in
real
property
and
fee
and
low
taxes.
According
to
the
most
recent
update
on
tax
assessments
from
the
auditor's
office-
and
there
is
also
a
1.3
million
dollar
increase
in
personal
property
taxes
on
heavy
equipment
rentals
estimated
year
in
revenues
are
going
to
be
are
at.
H
This
point
are
going
to
be
1.8
million
dollars
over
the
fy
22
border-proof
budget
of
597
million
under
the
expenditure
section
in
the
first
column,
total
expenditures
to
date
are
339
million
and
the
third
column
shows
the
estimated
expenditures
at
year
end
at
614
million.
This
amount
was
also
reported
on
the
january
update,
so
there's
not
been
any
changes.
H
The
estimated
year
in
expenditures
are
3.9
million
dollars
below
the
fy
22
budget
of
618
million,
and
this
is
mostly
due
to
vacancies
and
the
budgeted
reserves
that
were
not
used
for
seven
day.
Enrollment
changes
so
overall
we're
projecting
to
use
15.3
million
of
the
budgeted
21
million
for
fund
balance.
H
A
If
not,
thank
you
miss
carlin.
The
next
item
is
the
budget
process
update.
I
think
don
is
going
to
start
that.
I
I
We
expect
to
bring
to
the
art
and
finance
committee
on
on
the
may
committee
meeting
a
recommendation
for
a
first
reading
of
the
budget.
The
budget
is
scheduled
for
first
reading
on
may
23rd
and
then
the
second
reading
at
the
last
at
the
board
meeting
in
june,
which
is
right
at
the
end
of
the
month.
So
we
are
essentially
two
and
a
half
months
out
before
the
budget
has
to
be
adopted.
I
I
Although
I
have
numbers
I'm
going
to
talk
about
in
a
few
minutes,
we
have
met
with
the
county
auditor's
office
to
understand
what
the
sales
property
values
are
and
how
that
translate
into
revenue
for
the
district
next
year,
and
so
we're
pretty
solid
on
those
numbers
and
when
I'm
about
to
show
you
some
challenges
that
we
anticipate
having
next
year
based
on
the
revenues
that
are
coming
in
I'll
start
off
by
saying
that
with
the
state,
the
state
has
at
least
the
the
house
version
of
the
state
budget,
which
is
which
was
adopted
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
It's
now
with
the
senate
and
their
senate
is
deliberating
on
the
budget,
but
the
house
version
of
the
budget
allocates
an
additional
additional
7.2
million
dollars
to
to
the
district
over
the
last
over
the
current
fiscal
year.
So
we
will,
we
will
get
an
additional
7.2
million
dollars
in
state
revenue.
That
is
a
new
funding
formula.
So
that's
just
information
that
the
funding
formula
has
been
changed,
which
you
know
need
to
be
changed
some
time
ago.
It's
a
more
simplified
version.
I
Now
we
still
have
under
that
state
funding
formula
the
new
one,
the
the
the
statute,
that's
that
that
leads
to
the
index
of
tax
poundability.
That
shows
says
that
districts
that
that
have
that
reside
in
counties
with
high
wealth
for
based
on
property
values.
We're
expected
to
pick
up
a
greater
share
of
their
of
educating
their
children.
I
So,
prior
to
the
change
it
was,
the
allocation
was
based
on
on
a
concept
called
the
base
student,
with
the
expectation
that
the
state
on
average
would
fund
70
percent
of
all
children's
education
across
the
state
of
south
carolina
and
then
the
districts
on
that
on
average
with
would
fund
30
percent.
But
that's
on
average,
because
it's
based
on
the
index
of
tax
expandability.
I
So
a
district
like
charleston
that
that's
in
in
charleston
county,
which
is
the
richest
district,
the
richest
county
in
the
states
in
the
state
in
terms
of
property
value.
Well,
we
would
be
expected
to
pick
up
a
greater
share
and
then,
as
poor
county
would
pick
up
a
smaller
share.
So
the
spit
has
always
been
for
the
last
decade
or
so
at
least
a
70
30
bit.
But
in
terms
of
the
allocations
for
for
for
charleston,
we
received
the
inverse
of
that
we
received
roughly
roughly
30.
I
We
were
expected
to
fund
the
remaining
two-thirds,
so
the
the
base
student
cost
has
been
running
roughly
2500
per
student,
and
so
we've
been
we've
been
allocated
from
the
state,
roughly
eight
hundred
dollars
per
student,
whereas
we've
been
expected
to
not
expect
that
we've
been
paying
for
covering
the
cost
for
the
two,
the
remaining
two
thirds
under
the
new
funding
formula.
I
I
Excuse
me
just
to
talk
before
I
display
the
numbers
just
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
what
what
what
challenge
that
presents
to
us.
I
think
everyone's
aware
that
there's
an
expectation
across
the
state
by
teachers
that
they
will
receive
the
four
thousand
dollar
pay
increase.
That's
what
the
governor
and
the
legislators
have
have
discussed,
and
certainly
the
teachers.
I've
spoken
with
here
in
charleston
expect
that's
their
their
expectation.
I
I
Plus
benefits
is
19
million
dollars,
so
19
million
dollars
and
we
we
will
receive
7.2
million
from
the
state
and
then
on
top
of
that,
the
states
met
up
mandating
three
things:
one
is
step
increase
with
all
teachers,
that's
4.5
million
on
top
of
the
19
million
and
then
they're
they're,
shifting
the
greatest
cost
share
on
the
retirement
liability,
as
well
as
health
and
health
care
and
medical
costs,
so
we're
picking
up
additional.
I
I
think
two
point
almost
three
million
dollars
in
in
one
of
those
and
one
point:
six
to
one
point:
seven
million
dollars
additional
cost
to
another,
so
the,
for
instance,
on
the
basic
health
care
that
goes
up
18.2
percent
of
shift
for
us.
So
we
look
at
all
those
numbers,
then,
from
the
state
mandates,
plus
the
teacher.
The
teacher
4
thousand
comes
around
the
25
26
million
dollars
over
a
state
allocation
of
7.2
million
and
then
on
on
the
local
revenue
side.
We
were
somewhat
well
not
somewhat.
I
We
were
surprised
when
we
met
with
the
county
auditors
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
their
assessed
property
values
are
are
not
accelerating,
as
they
have
as
they
have
in
the
past,
and
so
we're
not
looking
at
a
substantial
increase
in
in
the
local
revenue.
So
with
that
picture
being
painted
I'll
just
say
that
we
have
a
challenge
this
this
coming
year
and
then
developing
the
budget,
and
I
would
say
also
it's
probably
the
biggest
challenge.
I
think
we
probably
will
probably
face
in
this
decent
terms.
I
In
the
timeline
I've
been
back
in
the
district,
as
you
all
know,
two
years
ago,
when
we
went
to
the
pandemic,
we
did
a
lot
of
detailed
analysis,
some
almost
like
economic
forecasts.
We
we
all
had
great
fear
that
the
economy
was
going
to
collapse.
It
did
not.
We
actually
benefited
from
what
we
what
we
adopted
as
a
budget.
I
We
benefited
because
we
got
additional
revenue
in
both
of
the
statements
from
the
from
the
from
the
from
the
local
revenue
plus
the
federal
ballots
that
came
in
on
the
cares.
So
that's
not
gonna
be
the
case
this
time,
so
let
me
run
through
the
numbers
and
then
we
can
get
through
some
questions
and
answers
on
the
numbers.
I
So
what
I
want
to
go
through
is
it's
not
it's
not
not
a
set
of
recommendations
at
all.
It's
just
to
paint
the
picture
of
where
we
are.
I
have
this
in
several
different
scenarios.
Just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
you
know
what
what
the
numbers
are
looking
like
and
how
we
might
think
about
balancing
the
budget-
it's
not
for
this
afternoon
intended
for
any
recommendations
at
all
that
I'm
making
to
to
the
committee
that
will
take
place
at
the
at
the
may
or
in
the
finance
committee
meeting.
I
So
just
sort
of
like
a
overview
of
the
geography
of
this
document.
Here
at
the
top
side
left-hand
side,
we
look
at
revenue
and
expenditures
where
we,
you
know
at
a
total
level
where
we
expect
to
begin
the
year
and
not
get
into
the
numbers
in
a
minute,
and
then
we
show
a
column.
That's
in
blue.
It
shows
again
those
revenue,
numbers
and
expenditure
numbers
again
I'll
get
into
those
numbers
in
a
second,
then
we
come
down
here.
We
have
the
expenses
for
next
year.
I
That
would
be
an
increase
over
this
year.
That's
a
section:
that's
called
required
increases
and
that's
pretty
much
what
what
it
means,
except
with
maybe
the
teacher's
salary
increase
and
now
getting
to
that
those
those
numbers
also
and
then
below
that
we
have
other
considerations,
so
we
have
the
required
increases
and
then
what
we
call
other
considerations
there
from
the
different
divisions
here
in
the
district
on
things
that
we
want
to
accomplish
and
I'll
talk
about
some
of
those
things
also
and
then
across
the
top.
I
Here
we
list
several
scenarios
scenario,
one
two
three
and
on
over
to
scenario,
four,
that
that
discusses
the
various
aspects
of
revenue
based
on
potential
millage
increases
or
no
increases.
I
Even
though
increase
or
a
series
of
scenarios
with
different
millage
increases,
and
then
we
come
down,
we
adopt
all
of
the
required
increases
in
each
of
these
scenarios
and
then
later
on
and
towards
the
scenarios
to
the
right
here
we
add
some
additional
expenses
that
we
didn't
have
in
the
earlier
scenarios,
so
just
building
up
options
in
terms
of
expenditures
and
then
on
the
second
page
after
we
sum
all
of
that
up,
we
take
a
look.
I
You
know
we
got
the
revenue
we
got
based
on
where
we
start
in
the
year,
plus
whatever
millage
increase
in
them,
then
then
the
expenditure,
the
various
scenarios
with
the
various
types
of
of
expenditures,
and
then
we
come
down
here
to
what's
what's
called
the
remaining
need
to
balance
so
this
this
is
what
what
the
challenge
is
in
each
scenario
in
terms
of
balancing
the
budget,
and
then
we
have
a
section
here,
strategies
to
to
balance
and
as
I
go
through
the
numbers
just
keep
in
mind
on
all
the
expenditures
that
that
are
none
that
are
not
required.
I
Those
are
open
to
whether
or
not
we
go
forward
with
any
any
of
those
and
also
with
the
strategies
to
balance.
These
are
at
this
point,
in
some
cases,
estimated
numbers,
and
we
certainly
have
much.
You
know
many.
We
have
several
weeks
and
much
room
to
make.
Make
adjustments
in
the
numbers
again
not
recommendations.
Just
give
the
committee
a
flavor
aware
with
what
the
financial
pitching
looks
like
as
we
develop
the
budget
for
next
year.
Any
questions
on
the
on
the
format
before
I
get
into
the
numbers.
I
So,
starting
here
at
the
revenue,
so
it's
617
million
dollars.
This
is
what
we're
projecting
this
revenue
for
next
year
compared
to
597
this
coming
the
current
year
and
the
difference
that's
made
up
of
of
the
21
million
dollars
with
this.
This
shows
this
negative
number.
This
is
what
we
use
out
our
fund
balance
as
a
budget
to
close
this
gap
right
here
last
year,
so
our
revenue
was
597
and
we
were
short
by
the
21
million
dollars.
So
we
use
fund
balance
for
that.
I
So
next
year,
fiscal
year,
21,
based
on
our
interpretation,
we're
not
interpretation
of
the
numbers
that
we
received
from
the
state.
So
far,
six
in
in
our
work
with
the
county,
we
expect
to
have
617
million
dollars
worth
of
revenue
for
expenditures.
I
We
start
with
where
we
start
as
a
base
for
for
projecting
the
expenditures
for
the
next
year's
budget
is
where
we
expect
to
end
the
year
this
year,
the
current
year,
so
the
614
million
dollars
here
is
the
same
number
that
you
were
seeing
on
the
monthly
financial
report
that
that
jack
has
just
presented.
Well,
we
expect
to
end
the
year
in
on
june
30.,
so
that
becomes
our
our
base
for
for
the
expenditure
of
the
next
year.
I
So
these
two
numbers
here
just
a
repeat
of
these
three
numbers-
brothers,
just
repeat
from
from
what
I
just
went
over
so
funds
available
for
allocation
3.2
million,
and
then
we
get
into
required
increases.
I
mentioned
the
teacher
step
of
4.5
million
dollars.
The
teacher's
salary
increase
is
19
million
dollars
of
that.
That's
assumes
a
fourth
four
thousand
dollar
increase
for
every
teacher,
and
you
can
see
as
you
go
across
the
scenarios
here
for
the
for
these,
for
these
first
four
sets
of
number
that
the
number
remains
19
million.
I
So
we're
assuming
that
that
there
will
be
a
stepping.
I
mean
a
four
thousand
dollar
increase
and
you
can
see
that
number
goes
in
half
here
in
this
next
scenario
that
that
that
that
assumes
that
we
would
not
give
four
thousand.
We
would
give
two
thousand
I'll
get
to
some
of
the
rationale
in
a
few
minutes,
so
it's
not
under
the
under
the
under
the
the
house
version
of
the
budget
that
the
house
has
already
passed.
I
That's
a
proviso
that
says
that
if
they
so
so,
what
the
four
thousand
dollars
right
now,
the
the
the
minimum
salary
for
a
teacher-
that's
just
starting
out
first
year
teacher,
zero,
six
years
of
experience
in
the
bachelor's
degree
is
thirty:
six
thousand
dollars.
That's
the
state
minimum
we
already
paid
ccsd
pay
five
thousand
dollars
for
our
vet,
so
our
salary
for
our
first
year
teacher
with
the
bachelor's
degree,
is
41
000..
I
The
difference
between
the
36,
000
and
41
000
is
called
a
local
supplement,
a
local
supplement,
and
so
there's
a
reviso
in
the
state
version
of
the
budget.
That
says
that
districts
cannot
reduce
the
local
supplement,
and
so,
if
that,
if
that
proviso
remains
in
the
senate
version,
which
you
know
this
is
being
debated
now.
But
if
that
provides
or
remains
in
the
senate
version
or
or
in
the
is
it's
not
taken
out,
then
we
would
be
required
to
give
that
four
thousand
dollars.
I
So
with
that
with
it
with
the
with
the
district
paying
41
000,
then
we
would
be
required
to
pay
45
45
000.
now,
if
the
proviso
was
removed,
because
we
are
already
above
these,
the
the
state
new
minimum,
the
state
new
minimum
is
40
thousand
dollars.
We
are
right
above
that
we
would
not
be
required
to
pay
anything
or
we
could
pay
anything
we
wanted
to
from.
You
know
one
thousand
two
thousand
three
thousand
four
thousand
five
thousand
we
wanted
to.
I
So
there
would
be
no
restriction,
but
if
it
revised,
though
it's
not
taken
out,
then
it
looks
like
we
would
not
have
any
choice
but
what
to
pay
the
19
million
dollar
four
thousand
per
teacher.
So
that's
the
difference
coming
across
here
then
the
retirement
increase
of
two
million
nine
seventy
nine.
I
mentioned
that
that's
just
a
cost
shift
from
the
state
to
to
local
government
governments
same
thing
with
the
health
and
dental
increase
of
1.7
million,
because
costs
shift
from
the
state
to
local
governments.
I
This
number
right
here
of
5.6
million
dollars
is
a
is
it's
probably?
What,
in
this
section,
is
the
only
number
that's
really
not
right
now,
don't
have
strong.
I
We
don't
still
have
strong
confidence
in
it
in
the
number
simply
because
it's
based
on
is
it's
estimated
based
on
the
old
state
funding
formula,
and
it
looks
like
there's
a
the
state
charter
law
says
that
we
have
to
allocate
to
charters
charter
schools
on
the
same
basis
as
the
state
allocates
to
the
districts,
and
so
but
there's
been
a
massive
change
in
the
funding
allocation
methodology.
I
So
jack
and
her
team
are
looking
at
how
to
convert
that
into
the
to
the
charter
school
new
formula,
and
so
that
number
this
5.6
million
dollars
would
change
and
I'm
not
sure
where
it's
going
to
go
up
or
down
here
in
the
operations.
Utility
increases
1.2
million
dollars
last
year
when,
when
we
were
still
heavily
into
the
cobit,
and
we
were
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
that
we
had
the
appropriate
indoor,
air,
indoor,
indoor
air
quality,
we.
I
We
we,
we
turned
the
hvac
systems
on
in
our
school
buildings
hour
earlier
than
normal
and
kept
running
an
hour
later,
and
so
that
was
an
increase
in
utility
costs
and
we
pushed
those
those
util
utility
costs
into
the
essa
funding,
and
so,
though,
we're
not
pushing
those
into
estimated
next
year.
So
so
we
would
expect
to
pick
up
pick
up
a
share
of
that
and
then
on
the
the
operations,
cultural
obligations
and
other
must
do's
5.9
million.
I
Most
of
that,
4.4
million
dollars
is
related
to
increases
in
our
the
contracts
that
we
have
with
the
with
custodial
services
and
then
some
other
escalations
on
contracts
and
in
the
other
utility
costs.
So
when
you,
when
you
sum
all
of
that,
then
the
required
increases
in
most
of
the
scenario
in
all
the
scenarios
that
that
contemplates
a
four
thousand
dollar
teacher
increase
is
41
million
dollars.
We
come
over
here
this
column
here,
where
it
drops
down
to
31
million
dollars.
I
That
simply
indicates
that
the
salary
increase
in
this
scenario
is
2
000
per
teacher
versus
four
thousand.
We
have
some
adjustments
in
the
mission,
critical
action
items
that
I
don't
have
detailed
out
here,
but
it
reduces
cost
by
the
1.4
million
dollars
and
then,
when
we
get
down
in
here
now,
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
a
lot
of
details
today,
but
lessons
in
learning
service
expansion.
I
have
11.2.
I
I
don't
have
that
detail
out,
but
there
are
things
in
there
like,
for
instance,
there's
39
additional
proposed
positions
for
our
exceptional
needs:
children,
our
special
education,
children
and
so
we're
looking
at
how
we
accommodate
those
those
requirements
and,
at
the
same
time
try
and
try
and
not
not
increase
the
budget.
I
So
when
I
checked
yesterday,
I
had
somebody
checked
for
me
yesterday
in
the
special
needs
of
special
education
positions
that
for
the
current
fiscal
year
as
of
yesterday,
we
have
like
61
vacant
positions,
so
those
positions
are
hard
to
feel,
and
so,
in
addition
to
the
vacancies
that
we
have
this
year,
but
that's
a
request
to
increase
the
number
by
39.
So
the
question
is
I
mean
if
we,
if
we
were
to
do
that,
I
mean
and
we
can't
feel
them.
I
Maybe
we
need
to
be
looking
at
another
another
strategy,
so
we
don't
have
that
detail
about
yet
until
we
work
through
those
those
are
not
those
types
of
analysis
and
then
in
the
section
here
it
says
human
resources.
I
I
I
have
nothing
in
there
in
terms
of
what
we
would
go
forward
with
and
then
in
the
later
scenarios
we
pull
some
of
that
over
and
I'll
get
into
the
details
on
that
and
then
stand
with
the
blue
column
here,
adding
up
the
total
other
considerations
that
I
talked
about:
learning
service,
human
human
resources,
there's
pieces
in
here
for
finance
and
et
cetera-
that
comes
to
36
million
dollars
and
when
you
add
that
to
the
41
million
dollars
here
for
required
increases,
then
your
number
then
becomes
this.
I
I
I
Well,
no,
no!
No,
I
don't
mean
to
do
that,
but
I
just
want
to
lay
out
what
what
the
so
again
in
the
last
four
years,
we
we've
been
really
fortunate
in
terms
of
the
revenue
streams
that
we've
had,
and
so
there
we've
been
able
to
make
some
adjustments.
We
were
able
to
allow
last
year,
for
instance,
although
we
have
some
reductions
in
enrollment
in
the
enrollment
student
enrollment,
but
because
we
have
the
the
severe
issues
that
teachers
and
staff
are
going
through
because
of
the
pandemic.
I
We
allow
some
unearned
teacher
positions
to
stay
in
schools,
and
so
some
of
this
is
sort
of
like
a
a
follow-on
of
the
last
two
or
two
or
three
years
when
we
allow
those
types
of
things
to
occur,
and
so
this
year,
obviously
that's
not
going
to
be
be
the
case
all
right.
So
any
question
before
I
get
into
a
couple
of
the
scenarios.
I
I
So
the
scenarios,
the
first
three
scenarios
look
at
changes
in
potential
millage
from
a
no
military
increase
next
year
to
a
9.4
million
increase
next
year
to
a
six
three
point,
six
point,
three
million
degrees
and
when,
in
fact
the
first
four
scenarios
is
not
intimidating
of
this.
This
scenario
for
that
we
have
a
change,
change
there,
so
9.4
mills
is
it's
the
maximum
amount
that
we
estimate
that
we
can,
that
we
that's
allowed
by
law.
I
So
we
have
three
three
point,
something
on
the
books
that's
unused
from
last
year
and
then
the
five
point
something
that's
allowed
for
the
new
year,
and
so
we
can
use
anything
that's
allowed
for
the
new
year,
plus
anything
that
we
have
we
haven't
used,
and
so
that
amount
then
is
9.4
meals
and
and
just
for
the
information
here
at
the
bottom,
a
meal.
This
is
the
value
of
a
single
meal.
3
million
dollars
for
each
meal
raises
three
million
dollars
worth
of
revenue.
I
So
nine
point
four
mill,
so
I'm
talking
a
little
bit
about
about
the
millage.
So
I
talked
at
the
beginning
that
the
state,
the
state
funding
formula
does
and
has
for
years
and
years
and
years
assume
that
it
is
the
responsibility
of
the
local
jurisdiction
if
they
have
where,
where
with
all
to
to
pay
for
their
their
their
appropriate
share
of
their
to
educate
their
students.
It's
the
index
of
tax
expandability.
I
It
didn't
didn't
change
under
this
new
state
funding
formula,
and
so
what
that
means
is
that
the
this
I
mean
the
state
is
allocating
us
7.2
million
dollars
with
the
knowledge
that
it's
going
to
cost
us
more
than
7.2
million
dollars
of
new
expenditures
to
keep
operating,
but
the
the
the
expectation
that
we
have
a
responsibility
as
a
local
jurisdiction
to
be
able
to
to
to
raise
it,
raise
the
the
difference
if
we
elect
to,
and
so
that's
why
I'm
showing
the
9.4
mill
increase
more
than
likely.
I
When
I
come
to
the
committee
next
month,
I
won't.
I
won't
be
making
a
recommendation
at
that
level,
but
that's
the
maximum
amount
that's
allowed
and
that's
in
keeping
with
what
the
the
concept
is
of
state
education
funding
here
in
south
carolina.
I
So
in
this,
in
this
scenario
too,
with
the
9.4
mill
increase,
you
can
see
it
says
the
values
three
million
dollars
per
meal.
So
here
when
I
in
the
blue
column-
and
in
this
scenario
one
we
have
three
million
dollars
to
begin
with.
So
under
the
scenario
two,
the
nine
point:
four
mill-
they
asked
that
know
almost
with
us
27
28
million
dollars
to
that
number
because
of
the
millage
increase.
That
means
we
have
revenue
men
in
that
particular
scenario,
too,
of
31.2
million
to
apply
to
to
these
expenditures.
I
So
here
in
scenarios,
one
and
two
here
these
required
expenditures
remain
the
same
coming
coming
on
down.
We
don't
pick
up
any
of
the
other
considerations
here,
as
I
talked
about
over
here
in
the
blue
column.
We
pick
up
none
of
that,
and
so
when
we
come
here
then
to
remaining
this
need
to
balance
in
scenario
one
because
we
there's
a
zero
meal
increase.
I
That
number
becomes
36
million
dollars,
36
million
dollars
to
balance,
because
we
didn't
pick
up
any
any
of
the
non-required
expenditures,
so
it
becomes
36
million,
with
zero
millage
and
with
and
with
the
9.4
mill
increase.
That
number
then
remaining
to
balance
is
7.8
million.
So
so,
under
that
scenario,
under
this
set
of
assumptions,
then
we
are
short
from
a
budget
standpoint
of
seven
point:
eight
million
dollars
in
scenario
two
at
a
nine
point,
four
mil
increase
and
then
coming
on
down
in
strategies
to
to
balance.
I
So
this
the
announcement,
the
analysis
is
still
being
done
here,
but
right
now
the
preliminary
analysis
that
we
would
freeze
non-salary
spending
at
this
point
in
time,
and
by
doing
so
we
could
save
2.7
million
dollars.
I
I
looked
at
a
file
last
night
that
that
I
didn't
get
incorporated
in
here.
I
think
that
number
is
going
to
could
potentially
potentially
increase.
But
you
know,
as
of
this
yesterday
afternoon,
was
what
what
we
were
looking
at
was
2.7
million,
so
the
intent
would
be.
I
We
would
stop
spending
a
slow
spending
down
save
2.7
million
dollars
in
the
current
fiscal
year
and
roll
that
into
fund
balance
and
use
that
to
help
balance
next
year's
budget.
The
same
same
concept,
with
with
the
hiring
freeze
that
we
would
say
we'd
estimate
to
say
three
million
dollars.
I
I
think
the
numbers
I
looked
at
yesterday
with,
like
maybe
four
point,
six
four
four
point:
four
point:
something
million
dollars
of
of
vacant
positions
right
now
that
we
feel
them
at
all
all
right
now
we
would
incur
4.6
or
4.9
million
additional
expenses.
Well,
that's
not
going
to
happen
until
we.
If
we
slow
down
the
hiring,
then
now
I'll
put
a
higher
freeze
in.
I
I
would
expect
to
pick
up
at
least
this
amount
from
that
from
that
four
point,
something
so
again
that
is
making
a
an
adjustment
in
the
current
year's
budget
to
reflect
next
year's
budget,
and
then
this
number
here
is
this:
five
million
dollars
says
used
to
find
balance.
I
It's
the
same
number
across
here,
except
for
scenario:
two
not
I'll
get
into
why
there
isn't
scenario
two,
but
the
five
million
dollars
is
saying
so
these
these
two
numbers
two
point:
seven
and
three
we're
saying
that
we
would
cut
spending
right
now.
We
would
use
that
money
for
next
year.
The
five
million
dollars
here
is
already
in
front
balance.
That's
already
in
front
balance
and-
and
so
I'm
saying,
reduce-
take
five
million
dollars
from
fund
balance
to
help
balance
the
budget.
So
let
me
talk
a
little
bit
about
that.
I
So
when
we
closed
the
books
last
year
we
had
145
million
dollars
in
fund
balance,
145
million.
We,
as
you
saw
here
at
the
top
here,
we
use
21
million
dollars
of
that
to
balance
the
fy
22
of
the
current
year's
budget,
and
so
in
the
budget.
The
the
fund
balance
for
fiscal
year
22
current
fiscal
year
is,
is
budgeted
at
124
million
dollars,
124
million
dollars.
I
So
we
have
145
we're
going
to
use
21,
we
budgeted
21,
and
so
that
means
that
we
would
end
the
year
on
a
budget
by
budget
basis,
at
least
124
million.
So
jackie
briefly
just
briefed
a
few
minutes
ago
in
the
month
of
financial
that
we
expect
to
actually
end
the
year
by
only
using
16
million
of
the
21,
and
so
that's
five
five
million
dollars
that
we
would
not
use
that
would
go
back
into
fund
balance.
That's
what
that
five
million
dollars
is
so
they're
saying
that
I'm
saying
that
we
would.
I
We
would
plan
on
on
budgeting
the
same
124
million
dollars
for
fiscal
years,
fiscally
or
23's
fund
balance.
That's
some
different
fiscal
year
22.
It
would
not
go
down.
It
wouldn't
go
up
if
we
used
to
five
million,
but
it
would
not
go
down
and
that's
that's
that's
critical,
because
I
mean
I
mean
everybody
on
the
committee
knows
how
critical
is
to
keep
on
maintaining
a
a
appropriate
fund
balance
and
then
so
with
you
in
this
line
here
potential
shift
to
s
of
two.
I
So
so
we
have
that's
the
two
dollars
that
that
were
allocated
last
year.
We,
you
know,
as
I
indicated
up
here,
it's
1.2
million
dollars
on
operations.
We
shifted
some
of
those
general
operating
funding
spending
expenditures
after
essa
ii
that
were
allowable
last
year
and
we're
looking
at
opportunities
to
maybe
do
some
of
that
this
year
we
don't.
We
haven't
done
the
analysis
yet,
but
we
look.
I
I
Do-
and
we
have
we
have
until
september
of
23
to
to
expand
our
asset.
Three,
that's
the
two
dollars
so
september
23.,
but.
I
Well,
the
first,
some
reason
why
I'm
looking
at
essa
ii
first
is
because
of
those
those
dollars
have
to
be
expended.
First
right,
caller
acid:
three
we
have
until
september
of
2024.,
okay,.
I
Possibility,
I
don't
know
what
I
don't
know
what
okay,
I
can't
see
what
the
probability
is,
but
there's
a
possibility.
Okay,
so
on
on
the
scenario,
one
then
no
millage
increase
when
you
do
these,
these
you
see
of
these
dollars
here
that
this
number
25
million
749
125,
is
just
simply
a
calculation
taking
the
36,
that's
needed
to
balance
subtracting
these
numbers,
and
this
is
what's
remaining
and
what
this
says
that
we
would
have
to
in
the
current
year's
budget
in
the
current
year's
budget.
I
As
we
as
as
we
develop
next
year's
budget,
we
have
to
cut
expenditures
by
25.8
million
dollars.
So
we
have.
We
have
we
have
a
at
beginning.
Here
we
have
this
expenditure
total
of
six
fourteen.
We
have
to
cut
out
twenty
twenty,
that
twenty
seven
twenty
eight
million
dollars
out
of
that
to
balance
the
budget.
I
So
that's
the
concept
working
through
the
scenarios.
So
the
only
change
is
that
we
change
assumptions
and
then,
as
you
as
you
see
here,
the
the
expenditure
cuts
here
across
these
different
scenarios
change,
because
we've
changed
the
assumptions
either
revenue
or
our
expenditures
or
combination.
I
So
with
scenario
two,
if
you
recall,
I
said
that
was
a
9.4
million
dollar.
Excuse
me
a
9.4
mill
increase,
which
was
about
27
28
million
dollars,
additional
revenue
and
so
coming
down
here.
Then
we
would
using
using
these
these
these
factors
here.
I
You
can
see
even
with
the
9.4
instead
of
having
to
tip
to
dip
into
front
balance
for
5
million
dollars.
We
would
only
do
two
million
dollars
need
to
do
two
million
dollars
to
get
to
a
balanced
budget.
So
this
this
this
this
gets
balanced
without
without
any
fy23
expenditure.
Cuts
like
this
26
million
year,
so
there'll
be
no
cuts
here
and
we
wouldn't
have
to
use
all
of
the
fine
balance.
That's
that's
maximizing
the
available
meals
and
scenario.
Three
is
instead
of
a
6.4
meal.
I
Six
point
three
mil
increase,
there's
nothing
scientific
about
that.
Just
well
just
a
starting
point,
so
I
said
well
what,
if
we,
you
know
to
take
a
third
of
that.
I
can't
remember
how
I
said,
but
anyway,
6.3
mil
increase.
Nothing
changes
here
to
here,
but
it
changes
when
we
get
stupid
does
change
right
here,
because
we
pick
up
instead
of
instead
of
31
32
million.
We
pick
up
22
million
only
because
the
millage
dropped
from
9.4
to
6.3.
I
We
still
have
the
same
expenditure
expenditures
here
in
the
in
the
required
increases
and
then
what
we
add
to
that.
We
add
two
things
to
that
one.
This
is
this:
takes
all
employees
up
to
a
minimum
of
15
hour.
These
hourly
employees
dollars
a
minimum,
and
so
that
would
be
a
thirty
thousand
dollar
increase
an
employee,
that's
below
fifteen
dollars
an
hour
would
go
to
fifteen
dollars
an
hour
and
and
that's
thirty,
thirty,
thirty
thousand
dollars.
Now
in
that.
I
I
think
I
heard
bill
say
this
morning
and
bill's
with
us
bill
briggman
yeah
in
the
cabinet
meeting
this
morning
that
he
has
another
scenario:
that's
not
on
here
that
I
think
takes
that.
What's
the
bill,
17
17,
17,
minimum,
yes,
and
that
what
was
that
three
hundred
thousand
bucks
around
okay,
but
right
now
this
is
saying:
fifteen
thousand
fifteen
thousand
minimum
at
thirty
thousand
dollars
total
and
then
the
next
one
here
is
to
remove
the
salary
cap
from
classified
and
that's
one
152
000..
I
So
it
used
to
be
when
a
classified
employee
that
that
worked
elsewhere,
they
worked
in
berkeley
county
and
they
transferred
to
got
a
job
here
in
charleston
school
district.
They
would,
they
would
only
get,
I
think,
12
years,
12
years,
credit
for
it
for
years
works
over.
I
Here
we
changed
that
we
lifted
that
cap
and
moved
that
cap
up
to
what
15
years
15
years
last
year,
and
so
what
this
does
then
proposes
is
to
remove
the
cap
all
altogether,
and
so
there
would
be
numbers,
no
capital
employees
transferring
in
their
years
of
experience,
and
so
that's
452
000.
I
So
so
in
this
scenario,
three
we've
done:
we've
done
two
things:
we've
we've
taken
mill,
millage
to
6.3
versus
9.4,
so
reduce
revenue,
and
we
added
this
182
000
dollars
of
expense
expenditures
based
on
those
two
items.
I
I
just
talked
about
the
15
minimum
in
the
classified
cap
and
when
we
do
that,
then
the
amount
that
needs
to
needs
to
that's
remaining,
to
balance
us
to
17.9
million
dollars
and
then
just
coming
down
to
usually
the
same
set
of
numbers
on
how
we
balance
that
in
that
says,
that
we
have
7.2
million
dollars
that
we
would
have
cut
out
the
expenditure
lines
to
get
to
to
get
to
a
balanced
budget.
So
here
in
this
column,
here
25.7
million
no
no
millage
increase
a
6.3
ml
increase.
I
I
I'm
sorry
you
don't
find
here,
so
the
mill
is
still
613.
So
you
see
the
revenue
numbers
here
remain
the
same
in
scenario,
three
and
scenario:
3a
these
the
required
expenditures.
They
all
remain
the
same,
except
for
the
teacher
salary
increase,
and
so
here,
instead
of
a
four
thousand
dollar
teacher
salary
increase.
I
And
then
we
have
some
other
salary
information
here
about
I'll
go
over
here
here
at
the
bottom,
so
you
can
see
from
19
million
cost
is
now
half
that
amount
to
be
able
to
fund
teacher
salary
increase
on
forty
four
thousand
instead
of
four
thousand
two
thousand
and
then
in
in
addition
to
these
items
here
that
we
talked
about
on
the
fifteen
dollar
minimum
and
the
salary
cap,
this
adds
in
these
other
items
here,
remove
the
teacher
cap.
I
So
just
like
the
salary
cap
for
classified
there's
a
teacher's
step
cap
and
so
a
teacher
maxes
out,
is
it
26
years
deal
so
after
26
years?
There's
no
step
increase
for
teachers,
so
my
teacher's
been
here
for
30
years
they're
still
I
pay
that
they
at
and
they
step
for
about
26
years
and
so
to
remove
that
cap
is
1.6
million
dollars,
so
there
will
be
no
capital
on
teachers.
These
next
two
here
is
one.
It's
not
this
two
point:
two
million
dollars
is
a
step
increase.
I
On
the
board,
the
board
approved
they
for
a
non-teachers.
They
moved
to
98
of
market
97
percent
of
market
based
on
the
study
that
was
done,
and
this
I'm
not
sure
what
this
is
asking
for
98
or
100
percent
up
here
since
98.
So
we
need
to
get
that
deconflicted
plus
here
it
says
100
percent
of
market,
but
whatever
that
percentage
is
98
or
100
is
6
million
dollars.
I
And
then
the
other
piece
here
just
like
just
like
the
teacher's
cap,
like
none
teachers,
also
cap
out
a
step.
What
year
is
that
30
30
years,
so
that
removes
that
26?
Also,
okay,
so
so
this
adds
a
substantial
amount
of
expenditures
associated
with
salaries
at
this
1.6
is
2.2
6.1
in
the
3.2
and
then
so,
when
you,
when
you
in
the
end,
it
decreases
by
9
million
dollars
the
expenditures
here
for
the
two
thousand
dollars.
So
it
is
allowing
for
other
employee
groups
to
be
compensated.
I
They
have
increased
compensation
and
then
by
reducing
the
compensation
for
for
teachers.
I
So
then,
here
the
amount
to
balance
is
21.3
million
dollars
and
then
just
going
through
the
math
again
you
see
we
would
need
10.6
million
dollars
to
make
adjustments
in
in
expenditures
to
balance
the
budget
in
the
last
scenario-
and
there
was
one
or
two
other
scenarios
in
here.
I
didn't
include
those
in
this
presentation
because
I
mean
just
scenarios
not
recommendations
yet,
but
I
will
come
back
again
in
may.
I
There
will
be
the
you
know:
I'm
assuming
I'll
have
two
or
three
scenarios
with
a
a
specific
recommendation
on
a
particular
one,
but
this
one
right
here.
The
change
is:
instead,
it's
a
reduction
in
the
millage
again
from
6.3
down
to
5.3,
so
we're
taking
out
essentially
three
million
dollars,
and-
and
so
you
can
see
when
you
do-
that,
the
revenue
drops
by
from
22
to
19
by
3
million.
I
It
still
assumes
here,
a
2
000
salary
increase
with
teachers.
Everything
else
remains
the
same
in
the
required
and
then
in
the
optional
here
for
salaries
we
leave
in
compared
to
the
pre
the
prior
scenario,
we're
leaving
the
leaving
the
removal
of
the
teacher
step
coming
on
count.
Yes,
a
capital
step
for
teachers,
and
we
keep
in
the
step
increase
for
non-teaching
staff
in
greece
and
non-teachers,
and
the
other
pieces
that
that
were
here,
these
other
two
six
million
and
three
point.
I
Here
and
so
then
we
come
back
come
out.
Do
it
again
just
doing
learning
the
numbers,
then
the
amount
of
balance
is
the
15
million
dollars
and
coming
through
there
now,
maybe
the
calculations
in
the
it
it
results
in
4.4
million
dollars
of
reducing
expenditures.
I
So,
first
of
all
we
have
to
get
to
a
balanced
budget.
As
you
all
know
we
are,
we
have
we
have
various
paths
to
get
there
and
again,
there's
not
a
recommendation
that
I'm
being
I'm
making
today
about
which
path
we
get
there
and
we
may
have
some
expenditures
that
we
may
need
to
add
that
I
think
that
I
didn't
detail
out
so
in
the
learning
service
expansions
and
maybe
some
of
the
other
other
considerations,
so
so
the
numbers
will
change
both
in
expenditures.
I
I
don't
expect
drastic
drastic,
dramatic
changes
in
revenue
there
there's
possibility.
There
may
be
some
increased
state
revenue
based
on
the
the
senate
version
of
the
budget
that
gets
reconciled
with
the
with
the
with
the
house
version,
but
I
wouldn't
I
would
I
don't
anticipate
any
significant
increases.
I
I
think,
I'm
being
scheduled
to
go
up
to
columbia
tomorrow,
to
meet
with
some
of
our
legislators.
Just
talk
to
them
about
about
what
some
of
the
challenges
are
in
terms
of
the
budget.
I
The
state
budget
and
it'll
be
the
second
time
I've
been
up
there,
this
this
budget
season,
so
we'll
see
how
that
you
know
how
that
works
out.
So
what
questions
do
you
have.
A
Questions,
I'm
gonna
just
kind
of
go
around
and
try
to
get
everybody
just
in
case.
So
can't
I'll
start
with
you.
B
B
So
a
couple
of
thoughts.
First
of
all,
as
usual,
I
guess
my
one.
I
appreciate
how
much
how
all
the
work
that
goes
into
this
and
how
hard
it
is
to
navigate
all
these
different
scenarios.
I
would-
and
this
may
be
less
relevant
if
we
can
get
to
an
actual
actual
balanced,
p
l,
but
obviously,
if
we
don't,
I
would
want
to
see
what
is
our
projected
fund
balance,
and
I
want
to
highlight
that,
particularly
for
the
full
board
when
they
have
to.
C
B
Context
to
be
showing
how
much
debt
we
have
relative
to
our
targets,
because
I
think,
even
though
those
are
a
little
bit
more
long
term,
I
think
I
think
ev
each
year,
these
decisions
impact
those
items
and-
and
I
think
we
should
keep
the
connectivity
of
those
points
anyway-
that
the
the
real
the
the
decision
in
in
trying
to
balance
these
different
light
items
yeah,
I
think,
that's
that's
largely
up
to
the
staff
and
the
board.
B
It's
really
those
are
policy
decisions
I
think,
are
a
little
bit
outside
of
the
scope
of
this
committee's
sort
of
objective.
I
think
I
think
our
goal
in
this
group
is
a
little
bit
more
about
process
and
prudence
versus
being
in
a
position
to
decide
what
which
sort
of
mission
critical
items
we
should
pursue,
and
not.
B
My
own
opinion
is
that
some
of
these
smaller
smaller
dollar
items,
like
the
15,
an
hour,
move
and
removing
the
classified
salary
cap,
they
seem
like
small
dollar
costs
to
doing,
what's,
probably
in
in
probably
helpful
from
from
an
operational
perspective,
if
you're
trying
to
retain
people.
I
also
think-
and
I'm
now,
I'm
probably
speaking
to
the
choir
preaching
the
choir
but
moving
to
100.
B
I
know
we
talked
about
last
year
about
moving
part
way
to
get
to
market.
It
seems
like
in
the
competitive
environment
we're
in
we've
all
talked
about
staffing
challenges.
We
see
it
outside
the
school
district,
how
hard
it
is
to
keep
and
retain
people
and
with
the
pace
of
changing
compensation.
B
I
think
we
should
look
if
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
do
it.
I
think
we
should
be
looking
really
hard
at
trying
to
get
closer
to
market,
because
that's
because,
frankly,
market's
going
to
be
moving,
if
we
go
to
market,
I
suspect
we'll
still
be
behind
and
we
already
have
shortages
as
it
is,
and
so,
if
we
let
ourselves
fall
further
behind,
I
think
it'll
be
harder
to
fill
those
fill
those
vacancies
anyway.
Those
are
those
are
my
thoughts.
I
So,
just
just
clarification
could
you,
I
guess,
repeat
the
piece
on
the
fund
balance.
I
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
that
make.
B
I
just
I
just
think,
maybe
when
we
present
this
at
the
bottom,
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
to
say,
show
what
the
fund
balance
is
and
what
what
do
we
think
our
target
fund
balance?
Is
you
know
what
are
the
perce
what's
minimum
and
what
what
do
we
really
want
it
to
be,
because-
and
I
think
we
should
be
showing
that
particularly
to
the
full
board
when
they
have
to
make
a
decision
on
this,
I
mean
a
final
vote
on
these
things.
B
A
That
makes
a
lot
of
sense
because
we
all
are
protected.
I
I
think
from
the
audit
and
finance
committee-
that's
real
important
to
us
probably
to
everybody,
but
it
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
if
everybody
could
see
that
when
they
look
at
the
numbers,
it's
right
there
in
front
of
them.
So
that's
a
great
a
great
great
suggestion.
E
C
No
I'm
good.
I
agree
with
what
ken
said
and
definitely
on
the
point
of
you
know,
making
sure
that
you
know
the
teachers
are
compensated
and
that
everything
else
stays
at
it
100
market
value.
I
know
it's
hard
trying
to
do
that,
but
it
is
going
to
be
important.
Otherwise
you
know
just
trying
to
keep
teachers
in
and
then
also
you
know
how
we
keep
support
staff
and
becomes
very
hard
on
the
competitive
job
market.
We
have
right
now.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Grandma.
E
I
just
had
a
question
about
the
comment
that
about
reducing
the
years
of
experience
when
someone
comes
from
another
school
district
into
charleston
county.
I
heard
something
about.
Maybe
you
have
20
years,
but
that's
only
equivalent
to
15
years.
What?
What's?
The
rationale
behind
that
concept?.
A
I
I
I
Okay,
and
so
what
that
means
is
that
if
again,
if
I'm
an
employee,
that's
working,
you
know
say
a
school
another
school
district.
I
have
20
years
of
experience,
then,
when
I
and
I
take
a
job
here
in
charleston,
county
school
district
and
I'll
get
credit
for
12
years
of
experience
for
paid
purposes.
So
I
leave
eight
years
on
the
table
and
I
had-
and
I
got
credit
for
for
20
years-
I
would
have
been
paid
a
lot
more
money,
and
so
this
is
to
remove.
E
A
Understand
are,
we
is
charleston
county,
the
only
one
that
does
that.
J
So
that
was
for
classified
hourly,
so
that's
your
classified
hourly
employees
that
were
had
a
cap
of
12
years
that
started
in
2005
went
from
12
to
15
years
two
years
ago
and
the
current
year,
it's
18.
So
our
goal
is
to
get
to
step
30.
E
J
Yes,
and
so
the
hourly
employees
are
the
only
employees
that
had
the
cap
going
back
a
few
years
ago
to
12
years
was
your
max.
You
could
get
credit
for
teachers
is
set
by
your
that
you
would
have
experience
on
a
teaching
certificate.
J
J
A
I
keep
asking
questions
so
I
don't.
I
didn't
mean
to
cut
you
off.
Do
you
have
any
additional
questions
comments.
E
A
You
michael.
F
You
know
if
we
can
do
it
in
a
sustainable
manner
where
we're
not
severely
depleting
the
fund
balance.
You
know,
then,
obviously,
not
our
decision,
but
you
know.
I
think
that
a
millage
increase
is
definitely
warranted
to
do
that.
I
think
it's
something
we've
been
discussing
for
quite
some
time.
As
far
as
you
know,
our
pay
not
being
as
competitive,
and
I
think
it's
out
in
the
market
everyone's
complaining
about
the
same
but
to
hire,
retain
and
attract
talent.
You
know
whatever
we
need
to
do
to
be
to
do
that.
A
Thank
you.
I
have
a
question
related
to
the
total
human
resources.
I
you
in
the
learning
services.
You
had
a
photo
there,
but
there
is
do
you?
Do
you
know
what
that
figure
is
looking
at
the
numbers
here
for
each
of
these
categories
under
human
resources?
Was
there
a
total
for
human
resources
that
I'm
am
I
misreading
something.
I
But
the
board:
okay,
so
lisa,
if
you
own,
can
you
just
total
that
for
me
and
send
that
to
me
text?
Yes,
thank
you.
A
And-
and
I
wanted
to
go
back
to
something
you
said
don,
because
when
I
was
listening
to
the
ad
hoc
committee
today,
the
funding
for
charter
schools
is
going
to
change.
Is
that
right?
Based
on
the
new
proposal
for
funding,
I
thought
I
heard
something
about
charter
schools
being
funded
at
a
hundred
percent.
I
I'm
sorry
you
heard
that
at
the
in
the
committee
meeting
you
made
me
I'm
so
I'm
not
I'm
not,
I'm
not
sure.
Okay.
What
I
did
say,
though,
that
that,
prior
to
this
budget
before
the
budget
was
changed,
the
state
statute
on
charter
school
funding
was
that
we
had
to
allocate
to
charter
schools
on
the
same
basis
that
we
were.
We
were
okay
and
that's
based
on
pretty
much
some
way
way
pupil
units,
meaning
that
you
know
you
have.
I
You
have
different
different
amounts
for
different
categories
of
employees.
You
know
you
have
an
employee
of
a
student,
so
you
have
a
student
with
severe
disability
that
that
that
student
would
get
a
bigger
allocation
than
a
student
without
a
disability
right,
so
so
that
that's
called
the
weight,
so
add
an
added
weight
to
to
a
base
number.
And
so,
since
the
funding
formula
has
changed,
it
appears,
though
we
have
to
change
how
we
allocate
out
the
charges
and
we
still
still
trying
to
determine
what
that
looks
like.
A
Okay,
based
on
you
know
the
comments
that
I'm
hearing
from
the
committee.
I
guess
if
we
were,
I
mean
we
know
what
our
role
is,
but
if
we
weren't
going
to
give
you
any
suggestions
moving
forward,
it
would
be
when
y'all
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
it
would
be
to
try
to
preserve
the
recommendations
that
you
are
making
for
human
resources.
I
mean,
I
think
we
all
agree
that
that's
very
important.
We
certainly
don't
need
to.
A
I
don't
mean
to
imply
that
the
other
issues
are
not
important,
but
we,
you
know
we've
come
this
far
and
it
would
be
hard
to
think
that
we're
going
to
get
here
and
and
resort
back
to
where
we
were
so,
I
would
just
say,
try
to
keep
that
front
and
center,
as
well
as
the
fund
balance,
any
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
committee
members.
A
Thank
you
all
very
much
for
your
input
on
that
and
don
we'll
be
thinking
about
you
over
the
next
couple
weeks.
As
you
pondered
this,
but
you
know,
we
feel
confident
that
you,
if
anybody
can
do
it,
you
will
you'll
you'll
figure
it
out.
You
and
staff
will
figure
out
how.
A
Okay,
are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
about
anything
before
we
go
into
executive
session?
We
just
have
one
item
in
executive
session.
A
If
not,
then
I
will
ask
those
the
personnel
that's
on
the
call
that
are
not
included
in
the
executive
session.
If
you.
A
A
For
anybody
that
was
interested
in
that
other
than
me,
that
total
was
29.9
million,
is
what
the
human
resources
considerations
add
up
to,
but
it
doesn't
include
the
teacher
four
thousand
dollars
for
teachers
or
the
teacher
staff
right.
Okay,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
those
of
you
who
participated
in
the
meeting
before
we
go
into
executive
session
thanks
bill.
A
So
we
are
back
in
open
session
and
we
discussed
the
contractual
matter
in
the
executive
session
related
to
a
facility
lease
agreement.
I
will
entertain
entertain
a
motion
on
that
particular
item.
B
A
Okay,
so
that
is
approved,
board
agenda
items
item
four,
five,
six
and
seven
don.
Yes,.
I
A
And
automatic
automate
correct.
A
Session
great
next
meeting
is
may
3rd
same
time.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
and
your
attention
and
your
efforts.
Everyone
be
careful
this
afternoon,
wherever
you
are
with
the
weather
and
I'll
see
you
guys.