►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Good
afternoon,
everyone
I
will
call
the
audit
and
finance
september
meeting
to
order.
I
hope
everyone
is
well
and
had
a
nice
long
weekend
before
we
get
started.
Don
has
an
introduction
to
me,
and
I
would
like
to.
I
would
like
to
move
the
risk
assessment
updates
under
to
item
number
five,
so
it
would
be
on
the
it
would
be
listed
under
item
number
four.
A
Just
because
we
have.
We
have
external
people,
making
the
presentation
and
we'd
just
like
to
get
them.
Let
them
do
their
thing
and
then
leave.
So,
if
that's
agreeable
with
you
guys
when
we
approve
the
agenda,
it
would
be
with
that
change.
So
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
with
that
modification.
D
D
F
E
Committee,
if
you
recall
back
in
the
spring
when
we
developed
the
budget
for
fiscal
year,
22
in
that
budget
was
a
new
position
that
was
created.
The
deputy
cfo
explained
to
the
committee
at
that
time
why
I
had
to
propose
to
the
superintendent
and
to
the
committee
and
the
board
to
create
the
position
so
we've
recruited
for
that
position.
The
person
who's
who
was
selected
started
yesterday.
E
So
yesterday
was
her
first
day,
and
so
she
was
at
the
board
meeting
yesterday
afternoon,
and
this
is
our
second
meeting
in
the
district,
which
is
the
finance
committee.
So
I
would
like
to
introduce
sean
williams
and
let
me
see
her
or
not.
E
Is
so
shawna
williams,
and
so
let
me
just
give
you
a
quick
background
on
shawna
sean
is
coming
down
here
to
join
us
from
baltimore
city
and
when
I
was
with
baltimore
city
public
schools,
shawna
was
at
publix
at
the
school
district.
Also
she
worked
as
the
budget
director
as
well
as
ran
some
of
our
strategy
program
processes
there,
a
very
dynamic
person,
although
she's
been
in
k-12
for
a
few
years.
She
has
a
varied
background.
E
She's
done
finance
work
in
the
federal
government,
she's
done
finance
work
in
in
the
corporate
environment.
Both
locally
excuse
me
nationally
here,
as
well
as
international
over
in
the
far
east,
china
and
hong
kong
she's
also
worked
for
the
city
city
government
of
baltimore
as
running
their
their
their
award
of
their
their
public
works
program.
E
The
finances
on
that
she
was
recently
in
new
york
city,
where
she
ran
the
finances
for
the
achievement
first
network
that
has
chartered
schools
in
new
york
city
and
in
parts
of
new
england,
primarily
in
providence,
in
new
haven,
connecticut
and
then
most
recently
before
joining
us.
E
Shauna
was
the
cfo
with
baltimore
city
community
college
and
she
has
a
real
passion
for
k-12,
and
so
that's
why
she's
coming
back
to
the
k-12
world,
although
she's
coming
here
from
baltimore
she's,
a
native
of
the
south,
having
started
her
early
life
in
macon
georgia
where
she
was
born
and
she
went
to
baltimore,
as
you
know
later
on
in
her
education.
So
I'm
I'm
really
pleased
to
have
her
here,
she's,
exceptionally
good
at
what
she
does.
E
I
like
to
tell
people
that
she's
she's
better
than
than
I
am
so
so
I'm
glad
to
have
her
on
board.
Thank
you,
mr
queen.
Thank
you.
Welcome.
A
Okay,
so
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval.
G
F
A
Thank
you.
The
fall
general
obligation
bonds,
mr
kennedy,
so.
E
Thank
you
so
we're
going
to
have
carol
clark.
The
alban
attorney
address
that
item
so.
H
Thank
you,
mr
kennedy,
hello,
everybody.
This
is
our
fall
geo
that
we
do
every
year
for
a
couple
of
different
purposes.
H
This
year,
we've
got
two
series:
the
bonds
that
we'll
be
looking
to
issue
the
series,
a
bonds
and
the
principal
amount
not
to
exceed
97
million
dollars
will
be
issued
to
make
the
december
1
payment
due
on
the
2013
and
2014
installment
purchase
funds,
which
are
also
called
the
alternative,
financing,
bonds
and
series
a
will
also
be
used
to
retire
the
2021,
a
ban
which
was
issued
back
in
may
to
make
the
june
1
payments
on
those
funds
and
also
to
pay
fixed
cost
of
ownership.
H
So
that's
that
series
a
not
exceeding
97
million
dollars
and
then
series
b
is
something
that's
new.
We
had
our
first
taxable
bond
anticipation.
Note
this
past
spring
and
the
reason
we've
got
a
small
taxable
piece
is
that
in
2020
we
issued
a
series
of
taxable
bonds
to
refinance
because
rates
were
so
low.
H
We
were
able
to,
and
because
of
some
tax
law
changes,
we
were
only
able
to
do
those
as
taxable
bonds,
but
still
realize
the
savings,
and
since
that
was
a
taxable
issue,
we
need
to
do
a
taxable
piece
now
to
make
the
december
one
payment
and
to
retire
the
ban
that
was
issued
to
make
the
june
1
payment
on
that
taxable
series.
2020..
H
A
Thank
you
carol.
Are
there
miss
kennedy?
Do
you
have
anything
to
add?
I
do
not.
Okay.
Are
there
any
questions
from
any
members
of
the
committee.
A
All
right,
you
guys
are
too
quiet.
You
gotta
raise
some
sand
somehow,
but
anyways.
If
there
are
no
questions
I'll,
entertain
a
motion
for
the
approval
of
the
obligations.
I
A
Okay,
the
next
item
on
the
list
is
the
risk
assessment
updates
and
we've
got
a
presentation
coming
from
elliot
davis.
F
Yes,
ma'am,
so
thank
you.
So
if.
E
The
committee
recalls
last
year
we
got
contracted
with
the
the
art
of
firm
of
elliott
davis
to
conduct
our
internal
audits
for
fiscal
year
21..
That
plan
called
for
them
to
do
two:
two
artists
or
two
risk
assessments.
One
was
the
procurement
department
in
functions
that
would
they
present.
There
was
also
that
worked
to
the
committee
a
couple
of
months
ago.
E
The
other
item
was
the
it,
and
so
we
are
here
to
present
the
results
of
the
audit
for
the
I.t
risk
assessment
and
we
have
jay
breeze
with
elliott
davis.
That's
going
to
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to.
J
Great,
thank
you
guys
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
meet
with
you
all
this
afternoon,
so
my
name
is
jay
breetz,
I'm
a
principal
in
our
charlotte
office.
I
lead
our
digital
risk
services
practice
which
includes
our
internal
audit
and
it
audit
groups
on
on
the
line.
J
I
also
have
austin
miller,
who
is
a
manager,
and
he
leads
our
internal
audit
practice,
so
I'm
gonna
turn
over
to
him
in
just
a
minute,
but
we
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
to
work
with
the
district
and
certainly
can
stick
around
as
long
as
you
need
us
to
answer,
questions
after
austin
kind
of
goes
through
the
presentation
of
our
findings.
To
this
point
so
austin
you
want
to
kind
of
run
through
the
the
the
presentation
you
have
that
presents
the
reports.
K
Absolutely
yeah
thanks
jay,
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
now.
So
if
anybody
cannot
see
it
in
a
few
seconds,
please
stop
me
and
I
will
out
what's
going
on,
should
be
sharing
now.
K
K
So
yeah
the
the
agenda
for
today
is
to
go
over
just
the
project
team.
Briefly,
you've
met
most
of
us
already
between
jay
and
myself,
quick
overview
of
kind
of
what
the
internal
audit
process
looks
like
and
then
go
over
in
a
little
bit
more
detail:
the
results
of
the
information
technology
audit
and
then
briefly
discuss
what
the
upcoming
audit
areas
are
going
to
be
for
the
coming
months.
K
So
mention
jay
and
myself
are
the
primary
contacts
for
ccsd
and
these
internal
audits,
but
given
the
scope
of
this
internal
audit
with
the
it
focus
caroline
morris
and
her
team
are
also
heavily
involved,
she
couldn't
make
it
on
the
call
today,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
her
a
shout
out
for
her
assistance
with
this.
With
this
project.
K
So
briefly,
I
want
to
just
discuss
kind
of
what
the
process
looks
like
for
our
internal
audits,
so
that
you'll
understand
kind
of
how
we
came
to
some
of
our
conclusions
and
our
findings
here.
So,
as
don
mentioned,
you
know,
management
and
us
at
ellie
davis
help
to
identify
certain
areas
based
on
the
risk
assessment
that
require
review
either.
Based
on
you
know,
some
sort
of
initial
concern,
or
perhaps
just
the
materiality
of
the
area.
You
know
I
t
and
cyber
security
are
always
a
concern.
K
We
might
do
some
detailed
testing,
you
know
looking
at
or
selecting
certain
samples
of
you
know,
information
system
assets
to
determine
if
they're
configured
appropriately,
so
on
so
just
get
a
little
bit
deeper
into
actually
testing
some
of
the
controls
that
were
that
are
supposed
to
be
in
place
based
on
the
interviews
that
were
conducted
in
that
second
step
and
then
finally
summarizing
all
of
our
findings.
So
you
know
kind
of
what
we're
doing
today
is
discussing
what
the
results
of
the
audit
were.
K
What
some
of
the
findings
were,
what
the
risk
level
are
for
those
findings
and
then
maybe
just
some
additional
value
added
recommendations
that
you
know
aren't
necessarily
a
finding
per
se,
but
are
an
area
for
improvement
based
on
industry,
best
practices
or
just
prior
experience
that
we've
had
at
le
davis.
K
K
It
internal
audit.
There
was
actually
so
you
can
see
the
scope
here:
logical
access
change
management,
backups
cyber
security
network
and
active
directory
muni
systems
and
then
the
review
period
being
march,
1st
2020
through
february
28
2021.,
and
something
that's
important
to
note,
I
believe,
tom's
on
the
phone,
but
there
have
been
some
process
or
kind
of
organizational
changes
with
kind
of
how
it
and
business
intelligence
operate.
K
So
some
of
this
may
have
changed
already
in
terms
of
who
owns
what
in
terms
of
whether
these
findings
were
already
remediated,
but
just
wanted
to
call
that
out,
because
you
know
at
this
point
with
the
review
period
being
february,
28
2021-
it
is
a
while
ago
now
so
there
have
been
some
changes,
but
so
call
that
out
so
here's
the
the
summary
of
the
audit
area
ratings.
So
overall
in
the
bottom
right,
you
can
see.
We've
calculated
a
2.8
out
of
four
that's
on
the
high
end
of
needs
improvement.
K
You
can
see
on
this
graph
the
kind
of
the
ranges
for
each
of
these
audit
ratings
and
then
so
the
maximum
being
a
four
out
of
four
and
then
you
can
see
the
details
in
terms
of
what
the
specific
audit
areas
rated
for
each
of
the
you
know
the
I.t
processes
and
business
intelligence
processes.
K
We've
got
two
that
were
that
we
calculated
as
needs
improvement
three
in
the
satisfactory
recommendations.
So
these
you
know
largely
operated
as
designed
and,
as
expected,
just
had
a
few
areas
that
needed
a
little
bit
of
recommendations
or
a
little
bit
of
improvement
and
then,
finally,
an
area
that
we
didn't
really
notice
anything
that
needed
updating
or
needed
any
changes.
So
we'll
get
into
some
of
the
details
here.
K
So,
on
the
far
right
hand,
column
you'll
see
the
final
conclusion
for
the
audit
ratings
that
will
map
to
that
prior
screen
that
we
were
looking
at
business
intelligence.
You've
got
two
areas
that
were
in
scope,
one
with
that
satisfactory
with
recommendations
rating
and
then
one
satisfactory,
which
led
us
to
the
satisfactory
recommendations
overall
rating
for
that
and
within
it.
K
You've
got
two
with
needs,
improvement,
two
with
satisfactory
recommendations
and
just
based
on
the
number
calculation
that
led
us
to
the
needs,
improvement
conclusion,
but
again
we'll
get
into
some
of
these
more
detailed
risks
and
kind
of
what
led
us
to
these
conclusions,
but
again
just
a
higher
level
summary
of
kind
of
where
these
findings
were
based
on
the
audit
area
in
the
business
process.
K
So
we're
going
to
go
through
each
of
these
findings,
starting
with
the
high
rated
risks
and
then
moving
down
to
just
the
best
practice.
Recommendations
that
I
mentioned
earlier
feel
free
to
stop
me
at
any
time.
If
you've
got
questions
about
any
of
these
items
again,
as
I
mentioned,
these
have
all
been
communicated
to
the
key
stakeholders.
You
know,
I
know
corrective
action
plans
are
either
already
in
process
or
in
planning
in
the
planning
phases
of
in
process.
K
So
these
are
certainly
areas
that
are
being
addressed
and
we'll
work
with
the
district
to
ensure
that
they,
you
know
all
these
recommendations
are
fully
implemented.
K
So
the
first
one
related
to
the
control
activity
with
change
management
and
the
basically
the
change
management
process,
with
changes
being
tested
and
approved
prior
to
being
moved
into
production,
and
the
finding
here
was
that
at
the
time
of
review,
the
district
did
not
follow
formalized
change
management
process,
which
was
documented
in
the
policy
and
you'll.
Note
that
management's
response
they
are
currently
or
have
already
moved
the
change
management
process
into
a
more
sophisticated
I.t
ticketing
system.
K
That
will
allow
a
lot
of
these
changes
to
be
documented
and
formally
approved,
which
will
help
kind
of
remediate
this
finding
and
really
the
the
idea
behind
this
is
you
know
if
there
are,
if
there's
not
a
formalized
change
management
process
with
separate
testers,
separate
approvers,
that
there
could
be
changes
that
are
moved
into
production
for
certain
critical
systems
that
could
cause
some
pretty
catastrophic.
K
You
know
impacts
to
the
district
and
into
the
district's
user
of
those
users
of
those
systems,
so
ensuring
that
there
is
that
segregation
of
duties
and
ensuring
that
there
is
a
proper
change
management
policy
and
process
is
very
key
to
ensuring
a
mature
change
management,
environment.
K
The
next
two
are
pretty
related
in
terms
of
the
vulnerability
assessments
and
penetration
tests.
Essentially,
we
like
to
see
at
least
annual
vulnerability
scanning
and
annual
penetration
testing.
The
frequency
of
those
can
vary
depending
on
the
needs
and
the
criticality
of
each
of
the
systems
and
kind
of
the
scope
of
those
reviews,
but
I
would
say
at
least
annually
would
certainly
be
the
minimum.
K
Unfortunately,
cyber
attackers
did
not
let
up
with
covid
as
a
lot
of
these
companies
did
so
they
actually
ramped
up
a
lot
of
their
cyber
attacks,
knowing
that
companies
might
be
trying
to
save
a
little
money
in
their
cyber
security
departments-
and
you
know
with
with
folks
working
from
home
and
working
remotely,
that
opens
up
organizations
to
additional
vulnerabilities.
K
So
we
certainly
recommend
that
the
district
perform
vulnerability
scanning
and
penetration
testing
at
least
annually,
perhaps
more
frequently,
if,
if
necessary,
but
again,
you
know,
I
understand
a
lot
of
impacts
from
covet,
but,
as
I
mentioned,
unfortunately,
cyber
attackers
are
not
taking
that
into
account
they're,
actually
increasing
their
their
presence
and
making
these
attacks.
K
K
K
We
have
communicated
this
in
a
you
know,
verbal
meeting
with
the
key
stakeholders,
but
we
just
need
something:
a
little
more
formal
to
be
documented,
we've
reached
out
for
that,
so
just
waiting
to
get
a
formalized
response
and
kind
of
corrective
action
or
remediation
plan,
and
then
we'll
we'll
document
that
so
we
can
finalize
this
report,
but
really
when,
when
we're
thinking
about
auditing
and
just
doing
internal
reviews
to
ensure
access
rights
are
appropriate
having
a
way
an
easy
way
to
extract
these
populations,
whether
it's
terminations
or
access
modifications.
K
That
makes
it
easier
on
both
the
auditors
and
the
internal
reviewers
to
ensure
that
those
individuals
that
are
you
know
transferring
or
have
an
access
modification
for
whatever
reason
that
their
the
proper
processes
are
followed
for
approval
and
ensuring
that
there
is
a
secondary
review
to
ensure
that
the
access
is
correct
to
potentially,
you
know,
prevent
fraudulent
activity
or
even
just
malicious
activity
or
even
negligent
activity.
So
I'm
just
ensuring
that
there
is
a
process
to
extract
all
the
relevant
populations
to
perform.
Both
external
and
internal
audits
would
be
the
recommendation
there.
K
That
there
were
a
number
of
employees
that
had
access
to
the
data
center
and
essentially
most
of
them
had
the
the
job
title
that
we
would
expect
to
see
to
have
this
type
of
access.
K
K
Logs
are
now
maintained
on
syslog
syslog
and
currently
working
to
create
a
calendar
and
log
of
monitoring
so
already
things
in
the
works
here,
which
is
great,
I
think
the
second
part
of
that
is
very
important,
because
we
see
a
lot
of
organizations
that
keep
these
security
logs
and
these
event
logs
and
kind
of
just
keep
them
in
the
background
and
don't
really
periodically
review
them.
There
are
tools
and
I'm
sure
syslog
would
have
the
capability
to
call
out.
K
K
And
then
moving
to
the
the
low
rated
risks,
I
believe
yeah
there's
two
of
those
here,
so
the
first
one
is
related
to
one
of
the
the
terminated
employees
that
we
had
sampled,
we
tested
28
in
total,
based
on
the
population
and
really
what
happened
here
was
within
the
population
that
we
requested.
They
had
termination
dates
which
were
system
generated,
and
there
was
also
last
logon
dates
which
were
also
system
generated.
We
noted
that
for
one
of
the
employees,
the
last
logon
date
was,
after
the
employee's,
documented
termination
date.
K
However,
after
discussing
with
the
control
owners,
we
noted
that
one
of
the
processes
is
that
sometimes
hr
back
dates.
These
termination
dates
to
align
with
payroll
or
retirement
systems
and
that
the
actual
hr
hosted
for
termination
date
was
712..
So
in
from
an
it
perspective
and
an
access
perspective,
the
risk
there
is
low.
However
anytime
you
introduce
back
dating
and
kind
of
artificially
manipulating
dates
in
any
capacity
things
can
get
a
little.
You
know,
there's
risk
that
is
introduced
there,
whether
it's
fraudulent
risk
or
just
error.
K
We
noted
that
there
are
tools
in
place
that
kind
of
do
this
manually
just
looking
at,
or
do
this
automatically
looking
at
roles
that
are
assigned
within
the
system
and
calling
out
any
anomalies
in
terms
of
what
the
system
would
expect
to
see
for
access
rights
or
looking
at
terminations
so
on
and
so
forth.
However,
we
also
like
to
see,
on
top
of
that
a
more
manual
informal,
documented
user
access
review
that
might
catch
some
things
that
the
system
does
not
much
like
the
security
logs
that
were
mentioned
earlier.
K
Always
having
you
know,
subject
matter
expert
performing
a
manual
review
is
something
that
would
really
help
just
bolster
the
automated
tools
that
are
in
place
currently.
K
And
then,
from
a
policy
perspective,
we
just
noticed
that
the
change
management
policy
was
not
updated
or
reviewed
annually,
and
you
know
this
could
seem
like
kind
of
a
small
issue
and
it
might
be
as
long
as
the
policy
is
being
followed.
But
you
know
within
the
it
environment,
things
are
changing
pretty
much
constantly
and
if
an
employee
were
to
come
on
board
and
refer
to
the
policy
to
see
kind
of
what
the
process
is
or
what
the
expectations
are
for
the
district
and
that
policy
is
out
of
date
or
not
reviewed.
K
K
And
then,
finally,
for
this
audit,
just
some
of
those
best
practice
recommendations
that
I
mentioned
earlier,
not
things
that
we
really
wanted
to
call
out
as
like
a
finding,
but
just
things
that
would
really
help
to
take
the
the
it
area
to
the
next
level
for
backups.
We
we
noted
that
an
additional,
in
addition
to
the
high
level
log,
that's
maintained,
there
should
be
additional
documentation,
that's
retained
for
evidence
backups,
especially
during
failed
and
or
partially
successful
backups.
K
So
there
is,
you
know
the
high
level
log
that
shows
the
date
and
kind
of
whether
backups
were
completed,
but
we
typically
like
to
see
a
little
kind
of
the
next
layer
of
what
was
included
in
those
backups,
especially
if
anything
failed.
Sometimes
backups
will
fail
for
whatever
reason
and
then
automatically
restart
and
could
end
up
being
successful.
But
you
know
there
there
is
potential
for
data
loss
there,
so
just
having
that
additional
layer
of
documentation
that
can
be
reviewed,
especially
for
the
the
failed
or
partially
successful
backups.
K
One
thing
that
came
up
when
we
were
doing
our
reviews,
especially
for
access
rights.
You
know
there
are
a
lot
of
different
job
titles
within
the
district,
as
I'm
sure
you
all
know
on
the
call-
and
you
know
something
that
was
kind
of
confusing
to
us-
and
we
had
to
discuss
with
some
of
the
stakeholders-
is
an
individual
with
the
same
job
title
as
another
could
have
very
different
access
rights
to
certain
systems,
and
that
can
that
could
introduce
some
potential
areas
of
concern.
K
If
you
know
there
are
individuals
that
don't
necessarily
need
certain
access
rights,
you
know,
anytime,
you
open
up
a
system
to
more
users
that
are
required.
That
just
introduces
new
vulnerabilities
and
I
think
it
it
makes
it
easier
if
you
can,
if
it
is
possible
to
tie
a
unique
job
title
to
consistent
access
rights.
So
if
an
employee,
you
know,
has
job
title
one,
two,
three
anybody
else
with
that
job
title
has
the
the
same:
access
rights.
K
Certainly
there
might
be
exceptions
to
that
based
on
you
know,
extenuating
circumstances,
but
to
the
extent
that
that
could
be
implemented.
That
is
certainly
recommended
and
then,
finally,
just
with
respect
to
passwords
based
on
industry
best
practices.
There
are
some
configurations
that
we
like
to
see:
you
know
with
minimum
password
age.
It
was
currently
set
to
zero
days.
K
We
like
to
see
that
set
at
least
one
day
that
helps
to
mitigate
the
risk
of
somebody
either
an
attacker
or
an
insider
continually
resetting
their
password,
especially
if
combined
with
a
password
history
requirement
that
could
allow
them
to
easily
just
get
back
to
their
the
previous
password
that
they
used,
which
could
have
been
compromised.
It
just
introduces
you
know
additional
risk
to
the
district
and
then
for
the
password
history
setting.
K
We
noted
that
it
was
set
to
just
two
passwords,
and
I
know
this
is
this
is
a
pain
point
for
all
of
us
with
password
history.
You
know
always
trying
to
find
a
unique
password
that
you
haven't
used,
but
per
industry
best
practices.
We
like
to
see
at
least
the
use
of
the
last
six
previous
passwords
to
be
prohibited,
prohibited
from
use
to
mitigate
the
risk
of
using
a
compromised
password.
A
Does
anyone
have
any
questions?
I
I
think
my
only
question
relates
to
the
items
that
are
still
awaiting
management's
response.
I
assume
that
this
has
to
do
with
time
from
the
lapse
of
when,
when
the
audit
was
completed
and
management
having
an
opportunity
to
review
and
get.
E
The
response
back,
that's
correct,
so
so
we
there's
a
coordination
effort
between
two
or
more
departments
and
so
we're
working
on
those,
and
we
should
have
that
done
fairly
fairly
quickly.
G
So
are
any
of
these
repeat
findings
partner?
Any
of
these
findings
repeat
findings
from
a
previous
audit.
K
A
Okay,
were
there
any
were
any
of
them
repeat,
finders.
K
Yeah,
so
I
think,
as
as
dawn
mentioned,
this
is
kind
of
our
first
time
going
through
a
lot
of
these
audit
areas
at
elliot
davis.
K
So,
from
our
perspective,
this
would
be
the
first
time
that
we're
seeing
it.
However,
we
can
certainly
go
back
to
prior
audits
or
have
don
and
jackie
help
us
look
at
the
prior
audits
to
determine
if
this
is,
if
these
are
repeat
issues
but
yeah
from
our
perspective,
being
the
first
time
that
we're
reviewing.
It
can't
really
speak
to
that.
At
this
point,.
C
Don
or
maybe
sir
tom
have
there
have
there
been
any
issues
that
have
resulted
from
these
areas.
Obviously
it
appears
as
though
you've
started
to
you've
already
addressed
or
starting
to
address
and
we'll
get
full
responses
on
some
of
them,
but
have
there
been
any
issues
resulting
from
these
issues
from
these
identified
areas
yet.
L
Are
no
no
known
issues,
sir.
The
only
issues
we
had
was
that
they
came
up
in
an
audit.
L
So
there's
certainly,
you
know
important
things
that
we're
looking
at
and
like
he's
like
austin
said
that
we've
already
implemented
a
lot
of
them
are
on
our
way,
so
we're
going
to
take
a
full
dive
into
these.
C
K
Yeah,
so
we
can
either
present
that
at
the
next
meeting,
as
I
mentioned,
you
know
we
already
got
kind
of
verbal
responses
and
confirmation,
it's
just
documenting
those,
so
we're
going
to
get
those
documented
for
our
final
report,
which
we'll
send
out
on
a
jackie,
and
you
know
if
they
want
to
distribute
that
to
anyone
that
might
be
interested.
That's
you
know
they
could
do
that.
Otherwise,
we
can
plan
just
a
brief
summary
at
the
beginning
of
the
next
meeting.
That
would
be
helpful.
C
I
mean
it
sounded
like
the
path
to
resolution
not
to
not
to
short
circuit.
I
know
it's
a
ton
of
work,
but
it
seemed
like
the
path
was
straightforward
in
terms
of
addressing
most
of
those
issues.
The
one
that
I
wasn't
wasn't
as
clear
to
me
was
the
the
hr
date
and
having
email
traffic
occur
after
the
hr
date
and
the
back
dating
issue.
C
I
guess
I
guess
I
don't
know
if
it's
something
to
address
now
or
later,
but
it
seems
like
we
need
to
have
clarity
around
that
distinction.
You
know
they're
either
not
having
back
dating,
which
seems
like
seems
like
the
first
checkpoint,
but
secondarily
whatever
the
date
is
for
the
final
date
of
employment.
There
shouldn't
obviously
shouldn't
be
email
track
traffic
after
that,
and
I'm
repeating
what
you've
already
said,
but
I
just
I
guess
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
point's
going
to
be
addressed.
K
Absolutely
yeah:
I
think
that
that
will
need
to
be
a
combined
effort
with
hr,
which
we
can
certainly
help
facilitate
to
one
determine
better
path
than
back
dating.
You
know,
I'm
sure
that
came
about
because
it
was
the
easiest
way
to
ensure
that
they're
all
lined
up,
but
hopefully
there
is
a
way
because
you
know,
as
you
mentioned
back
dating
is
just
you
know:
it's
never
the
the
best
practice.
From
our
perspective,
it
just
introduces
risk
that
is
usually
unnecessary,
but
we
can
work
with
the
you
know.
K
A
Yeah
and
I
agree
with
kent,
I
would
like
to
see
some
follow-up
on
that
as
well.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions.
A
Okay,
tell
us
about
what
you
what's
coming
up.
K
Sure
yeah,
so
the
first
one
that's
the
most
imminent,
would
be
the
federal
programs
audit.
You
could
see
some
of
the
areas
and
the
risks
and
controls
and
improvement
opportunities
within
each
of
these
processes.
K
That
will
be
the
focus
of
this
area,
with
research
and
application
award
and
notification
program
criteria,
monitoring
the
various
amendments
that
you
see
here:
budgeting
claiming
reporting
and
document
retention
being
just
a
few
areas.
You
know
that
can
change
once
we
get
in
and
start
talking
to
people
and
if
there
are
additional
risks
that
we
haven't
considered
at
this
point.
But
this
is,
as
of
now
the
scope
here
and
hoping
to
get.
This
kicked
off
in
the
next
few
weeks.
K
Not
necessarily
so.
K
I
think
it
does
kind
of
naturally
have
a
flow
to
it
when
we're
thinking
about
this
area
and
the
processes
for
the
federal
programs.
But
you
know,
depending
on
stakeholder
availability
and
a
few
different
factors,
it
could
could
change,
but
in
the
end,
we're
hoping
to
get
kind
of
this
full
view
so
that
we
do
cover
everything.
K
And
there-
and
there
is
one
more
area
that
I
could
go
over
and
then
we
can
and
then
that's.
We
can
close
this
out
if
you'd
like.
L
K
And
this
this
area
has
actually
been
delayed
until
early
2022.
Just
because
of
you
know,
we
want
the
payroll
and
all
the
the
taxes
and
all
that
to
be
within
the
scope,
but
the
payroll
audit
area
will
be,
I
believe
we
decided
it
would
be,
kicked
off
around
in
february
of
2022
and
pretty
much.
You
know
very
full,
comprehensive
scope
for
this
audit
as
well
as
you
can
see
with
each
of
these
processes,
but
that
would
be
after
federal
programs.
That
would
be
the
next
area
to
be
kicked
off.
A
D
K
Yeah
and
again,
when
we're
thinking
about
kind
of
what
the
scope
of
these
are,
these
are
just
kind
of
a
preliminary
overview
of
what
we
expect
to
look
at,
but
things
can
change
once
we
start
to
get
in
and
review
documentation
or
talk
to
individuals.
A
Okay,
questions
from
anyone.
A
If
not,
thank
you
for
going
providing
this
information
going
over
it
with
us
and
expect
to
continue
to
get
reports
on
how
we're
doing,
and
we
certainly
do
what
we
need
to
do
is
try
in
terms
of
follow-up
on
those
items
that
need
some
work.
But
thank
you
very
much.
E
So,
thank
you
very
much
in
the
audience.
Finance
committee
packet
are
two
tiff
requests
from
the
city
of
north
charleston.
A
few
hours
ago
I
trained
and
sent
out
a
powerpoint
that
I'm
going
to
use
to
cover
those
those
tiff
requests,
the
pertinent
components
of
them
and
so
august
started
with
that.
F
E
We
received
a
two
two
separate
letters
from
the
city
of
north
charleston.
I
got
them
sometime
last
week,
each
for
two,
a
tif
request,
tax,
increment
financing,
districts
and,
and
so
just
for
just
for
information
purposes
on
these
tips.
So
typically,
what
happens
is
that
in
some
area
of
some
municipality,
the
county
or
a
city
there's
undeveloped
property
with
a
low
tax
base,
the
the
the
county
or
the
the
city
government
wishes
to
develop
the
property.
E
If
the
property
is
redeveloped,
that
means
then
the
assessed
property
values
then
would
typically
increase,
and
during
that
period
of
increase
for
any
government
in
this
case
school
district
here
that
may
participate
in
the
tif,
then
we
would
lose
any
tax
revenues
based
on
the
growth
of
the
assessed
property
values
during
the
life
of
the
tif
and
so
for
and
that's
the
case
in
these
two
tips.
Each
tif
is
being
proposed
at
15
years.
E
Each
is
for
infrastructure
improvements
to
allow
for
commercial
development,
so
I'll
go
into
a
little
bit
more
details
in
a
minute,
but
in
both
cases
they
are
proposing
to
do
infrastructure
improvements
and
then,
once
those
input
with
the
tif
dollars
and
then
once
those
improvements
are
done,
then
the
commercial
companies
will
come
in
and
develop
the
property.
E
E
The
value
of
the
tif
that's
being
proposed
at
seven,
not
to
exceed
75
million
dollars
and
then
the
second
one.
Also
in
north
charleston,
it's
called
the
craig
road
area,
tiff
around
remount
road
for
six
million
dollars.
E
There's
a
public
hearing
that
the
city
is
having
is
holding
on
october,
the
14th
the
district
has,
until
october
the
14th
to
notify
the
city
as
to
whether
or
not
we
object
to
the
10th
or
and
if
we
do
not
do
that.
The
state
statute
then
assumes
that
that
we
would
be
given
our
agreement
to
participate
in
the
tip.
E
E
The
location
of
the
tift
is
in
the
vicinity
of
the
north
charleston
coliseum,
it's
for
the
a
little
over
136
acres
and
it's
the
the
the
roads
that
surround
this
particular
tift
about
international
boulevard,
tanger
outlet,
boulevard
and
the
center
point
drive,
and
I
have
that's
a
map
in
the
package
that
was
included
in
the
part
of
the
finance
committee,
and
I
will
show
that
in
a
minute.
E
That
coliseum
tiff
consists
of
nine
parcels.
The
current
assessed
value,
the
assessed
values
is
the
value
that
taxes
are
levied
against
is
five
184
dollars.
E
The
the
estimate
that
was
provided
to
us
in
the
tiff
request
is
that
the
estimated
future
assessed
value
would
grow
to
fifteen
point,
eight
million
dollars
over
the
life
of
the
tif
and
then
the
estimated
tax
revenue
through
june
30
2040
would
be
34.6
million.
Now
that's
34.6
million
is
a
cumulative,
it's
not
an
annual
amount.
E
So
what
what
the
table
shows
in
the
package
that
that
you
have
is
that,
starting
in
three
or
four
years,
you
would
see
the
increase
the
increment
of
taxes
and
that
it
shows
that
by
year,
going
through
6
30
20
40
forth
him
with
the
cumulative
amount
of
34
million
dollars.
E
The
the
package
did
not
indicate
how
many
garages
a
transit
station,
assuming
I'm
assuming
that's
a
bus
station,
walk
away
walkways
and
boardwalks
roadways
and
utility
improvements
and
a
pump
station.
E
And
then,
once
those
improvements
have
been
completed,
the
estimated
commercial
development
in
the
area
of
the
tf
in
the
tif
district
would
be
550
units
of
multi-family
residential
units,
700
rooms
for
hotels.
I
think
it
is
it
contemplates
two
hotels,
300
and
400
rooms,
each
entertainment.
There
was
no
specification
what
type
of
entertainment
119
000
square
feet
of
that
retail
space
of
10
000
square
feet,
8
000
square
feet,
restaurant
space
and
office
space
of
125
000
square
feet,
so
that
would
occur
after
the
after
the
infrastructure.
E
Coliseum
a
tip,
the
second
tip
is
the
crate.
E
E
E
Thank
you
for
that
so
anyway,
this
is
the
map
of
the
proposed
tiffs
or
the
general
area
here
where
my
cursor
is
moving.
This
is
the
outlet
mall.
E
E
These
are
the
the
the
parcels
that
are
being
proposed
for
redevelopment
in
this
particular
in
this
area
here,
and
so
I
think,
probably
most
people
on
the
call
are
familiar
with
this
particular
part
of
north
charleston
because
of
the
proximity
to
the
airport,
to
the
outlet
mall
to
the
coliseum.
E
A
So,
john
on
that
can
I
answer
a
question
on
that:
the
slide
that
talks
about
the
coliseum
area
tiff.
It
talks
about
nine
parcels
and
estimated
tiff
revenue
through
630
20
40..
It's
a
34
million.
G
E
The
two,
so
so
so
that's
that
is
the
estimated
total
revenue
for
the
tf,
so
that
would
not
be
necessarily
for
that
would
eventually
accrue
to
ccsd
during
the
life
of
the
tif
for
those
15
years.
We
would
whatever
revenues
that
we
would,
that
would
accrue
because
of
the
additional
assessed
property
values
we
would.
E
If
we
participated
in
the
tif,
we
would
forego
all
of
that
and
then
so
and
then,
once
once
the
the
tif
is
is
concluded
in
the
revenues
a
flow
to
the
to
the
governments
that
participate
there
would
be
other.
Presumably
there
would
be
other
governments
besides
ccsd,
that
would
be
participating,
so
we
would
not
be
getting
the
you
know.
The
total
amount
there.
F
E
Powerpoint
so
the
second
tip
the
smaller
install
the
craig
road
area,
tiff
is
the
value
is
estimated
at
six
million
dollars.
There's
a
different
commercial
entity.
That's
a
that's!
A
partner
style
development
llc,
it's
located
in
the
vicinity
of
remount
road.
It
is
for
26.6
acres
and
the
roads
that
are
that
are
shown
in
the
map
and
in
the
tiff
request
document
on
remount
road
and
craig
road.
E
These
are
the
improvements
shown
here:
road,
road
and
related
improvements,
water
sewer,
storm
drainage
improvements
and
then
the
estimated
estimated
commercial
development
once
those
infrastruc
infrastructure
improvements
are
made,
225
units
for
town
homes
and
then
10
000
square
feet
for
commercial
general
commercial,
so
not
not
specified
just
general
commercial.
G
Quick
question:
so
what
is
what
is
the
benefit
to
the
school
district
and
participating
in
these
tips
and
for
these
areas
that
they're
projecting
to
build
homes
and
different
things?
Who,
who
would
be
the
primary
beneficiaries
of
of
these
developments?.
F
E
E
This
is
the
map
for
that
and,
unlike
the
one
with
the
coliseum
tiff,
it
was
difficult
for
me
to
try
and
figure
out
exactly
where,
where
the
property
is
located,
that
it's
not
indicated
on
the
map
and
the
map
is
difficult
to
read,
but
the
remount
road
is
here
with
my
cursor
over
here,
I
believe,
is
the
access
coming
down
this
way
to
I-26.
E
So
it's
the
the
the
property
is.
This
is
somewhere
in
this
area,
this
remount
road
area
here,
but
I'm
not
exactly
clear.
So
to
get
clarity
on
that,
you
know
we
would
have
to
reach
out
to
the
city
of
city
of
north
charleston
to
get
further
clarity
on
that.
E
So
so,
there's
a
bullet
policy
as
most
of
the
members
of
the
art
and
finance
committee
re
recall,
I
think
it
was
initiated
october
of
last
year
so
about
a
year
ago
on
on
tif
is
the
board
policy
de
on
tax,
increment
financing,
and
so,
as
I
indicated
earlier,
the
state
law
says
that
if
the
district-
that's
a
where
the
governmental
empty
entity
gets
a
request
for
to
participate
in
a
tif,
and
we
wish
not
to
do
so.
E
We
have
to
object
in
writing
if
not
with
that,
we
have
given
the
consent
to
participate
again.
That
date
that
we
have
is
to
do
is
has
to
be
done
by
october.
The
14th
and
the
policy
says
as
long
as
act
388
is
in
effect,
the
policy
of
the
board
is
to
object
to
a
tip
to
participation
in
a
tif
and
the
act.
388
is
one
of
the
state
statutes
on
education
funding
which
restricts
our
ability
to
raise
taxes.
Locally.
E
State
law
requires
for
the
the
for
the
municipality,
to
give
any
other
participating
government
that
they
wish
to
participate
for
a
five-day
notification.
Now,
that's
what
the
city
has
done.
They
gave
us
45-day
notification
before
for
45
days
prior
to
the
october
14th
hearing.
The
policy
that
was
created
last
year
says
that
we
need
to
have
nine
days
because
of
the
length
of
time
it
may
take
to
to
analyze
the
tif,
the
the
financial
pieces
of
it.
So
so
so
straight
away,
we
are
under
the.
E
We
have
not
met
that
the
city
did
not
meet
that
deadline.
Now,
more
than
likely
they
are
not
aware
of
it.
E
The
policy
also
requires
the
financial
analysis
to
be
done
by
a
third
party,
so
that
analysis
would
be
to
determine
the
financial
impact
of
participation
versus
non-participation
on
the
district
pfm,
our
financial
advisors.
I
spoke
with
david
moore
last
week
and
he's
he's
going
to
he's
reached
out
to
a
subsidiary
of
pfm,
for
them
to
prepare
quote
quote
to
do
the
analysis.
If
the.
E
If
the
committee
decides
that
that
we
want
to
go
that
far
and
then
if,
if,
if,
if
there
is
a
desire
by
the
by
the
audit
and
finance
committee
to
to
make
a
recommendation
to
the
school
board
to
participate
in
in
one
or
more
of
these
tips,
then
the
board
has
to
approve
that
with
a
super
majority,
which
is
a
vote
of
two-thirds
of
the
voting
members,
which
would
be
six
members
versus
just
a
normal
majority.
E
E
What's
the
advantage
to
the
district,
so
the
the
the
the
the
idea
is
that
right
now,
as
as
you
saw
in
the
numbers
so
in
the
assess
tax
base
for
the
coliseum
tif,
I
think
was
like
52,
000
or
so,
and
so
the
assessed
property
value
would
increase
in
their
estimate
to
the
point
where
we
we,
the
district
would
eventually
be
gaining
more
tax
revenue
for
for
that
same
property
as
the
property
is
developed.
E
E
So
even
if
there's
a
increase
in
revenues
that
that
may
be
derived
so
like
in
the
first
one
as
an
example-
or
let's
say
the
second
one,
the
second
one
there's,
I
think,
550
town
homes.
So
if,
if
those
town
homes
are
owner-occupied,
we
would
general,
although
that's
increased,
says
property
value,
the
district
would
receive
no
taxes,
no
zero
taxes
because
of
act
388.
E
So
there
would
be
no
value
to
us
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
there
will
be
additional,
potentially
potential,
potentially
additional
district
costs
for
district
services.
So,
presumably,
if
you
have
550
units
there
will
be
some
children
there,
so
there
would
be
bus
transportation
to
transport
them
to
schools
et
cetera.
So
so
that's
the
part
of
the
analysis
that
that
would
take
place
the
incremental
tax
revenues,
not
so
so.
E
What
what
happens
in
in
some
of
these
tiff
and
not
all
of
them
historically,
is
that
the
taxes
are
that
we
forego
are
used
to
pay
off
debt,
that
that
was
used
to
develop
the
property
and
the
debt
often
is
paid
off
before
the
life
of
the
tif
expires
and
the
in
the
municipality
still
retains
the
the
revenues.
That's
no
longer
needed
for
for
to
pay
the
debt,
so
they
use
it
for
other
purposes,
and
so
the
policy.
Our
policy
says
that
that
and
it's
more
more
specific
than
that.
E
But
generally
it's
saying
that
that
once
the
debt
is
paid
off,
any
additional
revenue
that's
generated
in
that
tif
would
would
accrue
to
the
district
versus
stand
within
municipality
and
then
the
last
last
consideration
that
I've
selected
out
of
the
policy
is
that,
if
the,
if
the,
if
the
board
wish
wishes
to
to
determine
the
likelihood
that
the
redevelopment
project
cannot
be
done
without
without
the
school
district's
participation
and
and
if
we
think
there's
there's
benefit
to
the
district,
then
we
would
perhaps
consider
participation.
E
So
with
that,
I
would
take
questions.
E
So
so
so
what
happens
here?
North
charleston
would
issue
bonds
to
do
the
infrastructure
redevelopment,
so
they
were
going
into
debt
to
do
that
and
then,
as
they
collect
as
the
property
values
increase,
they
they
collect
taxes.
They
use
those
taxes
that
we
would
have
received
and
pay
to
pay
off
to
pay
off
their
debt.
The
city's
debt.
C
And
don
remind
me
if
my
understanding
is,
if
my
understanding
is
correct,
that
if
the
school
district
elects
not
to
participate
in
a
tiff,
the
city
or
the
county
could
participate
in
the
tif.
But
our
piece
would
be
carved
out
and
we
would.
We
would
presumably
continue
to
collect
our
our
proportionate
piece
of
the
revenue
if
the
project
were
to
move
forward.
Is
that
correct.
E
First,
one,
the
coliseum:
I
mean
that
there
there's
some
infrastructure
problems
down
there
I
mean
probably
associated
with
the
land
itself.
I
think
it
is,
but
the
area
generally
speaking,
is
I
mean,
generally
speaking,
I
mean
they
could
have
the
outlet
mall.
You
got
the
coliseum
et
cetera,
it's
not
an
undeveloped
area
there.
E
So
we
know
one
could
presume
that
without
the
district's
participation
there
would
be
enough
reason
for
developers
the
commercial
developers
to
go
ahead
and
and
develop
that
property,
and
then,
if
that
that
would
be
the
case
as
that
assessed
value
of
those
those
nine
parcels
increase,
we
would
we
the
district
would
receive
the
the
tax
revenues
as
that
property
value
increases
without
without
without
our
having
participated
in
the
tif.
C
So
so
I
know
this
would
I
may
be
repeating
myself
for
a
lot
of
the
folks
when
we
talked
about
this
a
year
or
so
ago,
but
as
one
opinion,
it
seems
to
me
that
it's
a
high
hurdle
for
us
to
for
the
for
the
district
to
in
a
sense,
in
my
from
my
opinion,
speculate
on
foregoing
tax
revenue
for
the
purpose
of
you
know:
potential
economic
development,
even
though
that
might
ultimately
be
might
increase
our
tax
revenues
in
the
future.
C
I
think
it's
a
high
hurdle
for
us
to
do
that,
particularly
given
that
our
our
revenue,
you
know
revenue
expense,
you
know
match
match
up
tightly
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
excess
revenue
to
forego
for
the
purpose
of
economic
development.
I
don't
think
that's
exactly
the
mission
of
the
district.
The
district's
mission
is
about
educating
the
people
we
have
today
versus
trying
to
increase
property
values
in
this
commercial
district.
C
All
that
said,
if
we
were
to
go
down
the
path
of
of
trying
to
participate
or
consider
participating
in
tiff,
the
whole
reason
we
put
this
process
in
place
is
we.
We
would
need
this
analysis
that
compares
what
do
we
think
we'd
be
getting
in
tax
revenues
if
everything
stays
the
way
it
is
versus.
What
do
we
think
the
tax
revenues
would
be
based
on
the
developer
projections,
and
then
I
think
we
would
need
some.
C
In
addition,
some
sort
of
probability
assessment
of
if
this
area
were
to
be
developed
without
this
tiff,
because
I
think,
maybe,
as
you're
alluding
to
this
area
is
certainly
one
that
might
be.
You
know
it's
not
one.
That's
unpopular,
it's
certainly
an
area
that
might
continue
to
be
developed
even
without
the
same
degree
of
you
know,
infrastructure
investment.
So
it's
a
fairly
involved
analysis.
That
would
need
to
be
done
if,
if,
if
the,
if
the
board
was
to
get
over
the
hurdle
of
whether
to
participate
in
tips
at
all.
A
So
don,
if
we
don't
participate
once
the
redevelopment
is
completed,
we
then
would
still
particip
I
mean
we
would
that
we,
the
district,
would
get
the
assessed
our
assessments
based
on
the
then
current
value
of
the
property.
Is
that
right.
E
That's
correct,
that's
correct,
and
in
so
in
some
cases,
if
not
most
cases,
I
have
no
idea,
if
that's
the
case
here,
with
these
two
tests
from
north
charleston,
but
in
some
at
least
in
some
cases.
These
municipalities
don't
have
the
the
financial
wherewithal
to
be
able
to
do
the
infrastructure
developments
without
the
participation
by
these
governments
in
in
the
tif,
but
but
if,
but
if
they
do
yes,
there
will
be
no
impact
on
our
revenue.
If
we
didn't
participate
and
we
would,
we
would
accrue
that.
E
Oh
yeah,
so
we've
participated
in
a
lot
of
tips
and
that's
why
we
have
the
policy
because
there
were
no
parameters
around
that.
So
the
the
it's
understandable
the
the
example
that
I
gave
we
we
were
in
a
I
think,
a
30-year
tif.
Maybe
in
40
years
it
was
a
long
one
with
the
development
of
the
mount
pleasant
town
center.
E
So
when
I
got
here
in
2018,
I
think
we
were
losing
about
10
million
a
year
in
property
taxes
from
that
from
that
from
the
town
center,
but
now
about
two
years
ago,
I
think
it
was
that
tif
ended.
You
know
it
came
to
us.
E
The
term
ended
and
now
we're,
instead
of
losing
that
10
million
we
get
that
10
million
dollars
every
year
and
even
more
as
the
property
value
increases.
So
that's
that
that's
an
example.
That's
the
biggest
example,
the
largest
tif
that
we
currently
most
recently
were
involved
in,
but
we
have
several
other
others
on
the
book.
G
No
income
was
coming,
no
tax
revenue
was
coming
in
from
that
property.
E
I
can't
remember
the
exact
term:
it
was
either
30
years
or
40
years,
but
where
the
term
was
so
whatever
the
value
of
the
property
was
the
says
popular
value
was
when
the
tif
started.
Wherever
that
value
was
we
would,
we
would
continue
to
get
the
revenue
there,
but
that
would
have
been
a
very
small
amount,
but
as
the
assessed
property
values
increased
and
those
tax
revenues
increased
for
that
many
years
we
did
not
receive
it.
I
I
So
the
thought
is:
if
we
agree
to
participate,
then
essentially,
we
are
stuck
taxing
at
a
certain
level
at
the
current
level
and
then,
as
all
the
infrastructure
improvements
go
in,
the
idea
is
the
property
gets
developed.
Then
you
have
a
higher
property
assessed
value
because
it's
a
more
valuable
piece
of
property,
but
we
are
not
able
to
essentially
tax
at
that
higher
assessed
value
and
when
you
take
that
into
consideration
with
act,
388
which
also.
I
And
our
ability
to
tax
single-family
residential
and
only
rely
on
commercial,
real
estate,
it
really
kind
of
hamstrings
or
basically
doesn't
allow
us
to
realize
our
full
potential.
If
you.
A
Potential
go
steps
and
then
you
know
we
can
continue
to
discuss
it
or
you
know
if
somebody
has
a
emotion
or
some
thoughts
about
moving
forward,
but
we'll
let.
E
To
the
point
that
was
just
made
so
the
on
the
coliseum
area-
tf,
those
nine
parcels
are
assessed
at
184
500
currently,
and
so
we
get
very
low.
E
We
need
the
district
to
get
very
little
tax
revenue
from
that,
and
so,
if
we
participate
in
a
tif,
we
will
be
frozen
at
that
whatever
that
is,
and
then,
as
the
estimated
future
assessed
value
goes
from
184
thousand
to
the
15.8
million
dollars,
and
so,
as
that
property
increases,
we
would
get
none
of
that
revenue
during
that
15-year
period
that
another
that
increase
the
increment
is
what's
what
it's
called.
I
And
I
also
think
it's
just
for
the
maybe
the
newer
members
of
the
committee.
You
know
we
had
seen
several
requests
by
different
municipalities
for
different
tif
districts
in
the
past,
and
you
know
I
I
can't
say
this
with
certainty,
but
I
think
the
consensus
among
the
committee
was,
you
know
we
were
getting
multiple
ones
of
these.
We
were
seeing.
We
didn't
really
know
the
effect
on
our
overall
revenue
stream.
I
This
was,
let's
say,
a
new
apartment,
development
or
a
property
already
under
development,
and
the
development
was
already
happening
and
we
would
have
reviewed
basically
received
some
of
those
revenues
as
well
too,
so
we
kept
seeing
these
things
come
through
and
we
were
the
policy
when
we
said
okay,
we've
got,
we
see
more
or
more
of
these.
I
think
the
policy
was
okay.
Well,
let's
hit
pause.
We
can't
react
to
these
things.
You
know
overnight
or
in
a
couple
weeks.
We
need
to
understand
really
what
the
true
effect
is
going
to
be
on
us.
I
I
mean,
I
think
ken
said
it.
Well,
it's
ideally
a
good
thing.
You
know
it
really
isn't
part
of
our
main
core
mission.
You
know
our
missions
to
educate
children
so.
F
E
And
so
the
potential
next
steps
that
I've
drawn
out
here
are
shown
here
and
that
the
committee
could
recommend
non-participation
in
both
of
these
tips,
one
or
more
of
them
one
or
both.
We,
we
could
cut
conduct
a
third-party
financial
analysis.
If
you
know,
if
the
committee
thought
was
presented
by
the
by
the
city,
it's
worth
our
our
trying
to
consider
whether
we
we
would
we
would
benefit
from
the
participation.
E
We
don't
have
enough
information
with
the
fair
party
of
financial
analysis
and
want
to
understand
better
what
the
city
intents
are.
Then
we
can
invite
the
north
charleston
city
reps
to
attend
the
our
october
fifth
art
and
finance
committee.
Now
we
did
that
with
the
city
of
charleston.
I
think
last
year,
potential
school
board
vote
on
october
11th
board
meeting.
E
If
we
want
to
make
a
recommendation
to
the
board,
you
know
the
committee,
that
is
if
the
committee
wishes
to
make
a
recommendation
to
the
board,
and
then
I
would
say
october
12th
they'll
bring
notice
to
the
notice
on
the
board's
decision
to
the
city,
which
would
be
before
the
fourth
that
14th
deadline.
C
F
I
don't
someone
when
I
communicated
with
david.
E
Moore
late
last
week,
as
I
indicated,
he's
going
to
have
to
sub
the
subsidiary
to
get
the
quote,
he
seems
to
think
that
that
is
not
going
to
be
substantial
in
in
because
I
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
how
much
of
an
analysis
he
thinks
that
that
might
be
needed
here.
So
if
it
was
a
relatively
sort
of
like
non-in-depth
analysis,
then
the
cost
would
not
be
high.
Let
me
just
make
sure
in
an
email
he
didn't
tell
me
a
potential
figure.
A
If
it's
going
to
be
developed
into
personal
property,
I
mean
where
we
know
we
wouldn't
get
any
benefit
from.
Unless
my
mind
is
too
I'm
not
thinking
appropriately,
I
mean,
I
know,
they've
got
10
000
square
feet
of
some
other,
but
it
seems
like
the
major
part
of
that
is
for
townhomes.
F
I
I
I
could
be
completely
off
with
this,
but
that's
just
kind
of
a
gut
initial
reaction.
I
You
know
I'm
I'm
leaning
towards
you
know
seeing
that
study
to
get
some
hard
numbers
assuming
the
overall
cost
to
the
district
is
not
astronomical.
I
mean
it's
a
reasonable,
reasonable
figure.
I
would
say
why
not,
but
you
know
at
the
same
time,
it's
tough
to
say
without
actually
having
hard
quantitative
proof
in
front
of
me.
G
A
I
I
It's
not
that
we
don't
want
to
participate,
but
we
are
very
much
limited
in
our
ability
to
raise
or
to
raise
revenues
from
act
388
and
as
such,
we
implemented
this
policy
to
fully
understand
tiffs,
which
involve
a
I'll
call
it
a
feasibility
study,
if
you
will,
but
just
to
study
on
the
revenue
impacts.
Do
you
think
you
know
this
is
just
an
idea.
You
know:
could
we
get
potentially
the
city
to
to
maybe
pay
for
that?
I
don't
know
if
that's
even
a
possibility
or
join
in
on
that
cost.
E
But
the
policy,
the
policy
actually
requires
the
municipality
to
pay
for
the
for
the
for
the
study
for
the
analysis,
not
the
district.
G
C
So
I
guess
I'll
jump
back
back
in
I.
I
would
suggest
that
it
does
make
sense
for
us
to
do
this
analysis
if
for
no
other
reason
than
for
us
to
go
through
the
analysis
so
that
we
can
can
one
make
sure
we
make
the
right
decision
on
this
particular
set
of
tiffs,
but
also
that
we
can
go
through
the
process,
and
so
we
can
know
going
forward
how
this
works
and
what
our
appetite
for
it
is.
I
will
share
that
my
my.
C
C
So
it's
probably
a
good
exercise
for
us
to
do
this.
That
makes
it
harder
for
them
to
pay
for
it,
but
it
seems
like
we
should
probably
do
the
analysis.
I
C
Sorry
last
thought,
though,
is
I
I
might
if,
if,
if
the,
if
there's
a
strong
leaning
from
this
committee
against
doing
the
tiff,
even
if
we
do
the
analysis,
it
might
be
fair
to
share
that
up
front.
You
know,
I
don't
think
we're
trying
to
be
obstructionist
to
their
process.
So
if
we,
if
we
don't
think
we're
likely
to
participate,
we
might
as
well
give
them
a
heads
up,
even
if
we're
going
to
go
through
the
analysis
to
just
confirm
just
in
just
as
a
good
citizen.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
since
we
don't
know
if
they
can
do
this
without
us,
it
would
be
the
nicer
thing
to
do
as
a
citizen
to
to
maybe
get
that
information
and-
and
I
agree
ken
that
if
we
don't
think
we
want
to
participate,
you
know
to
give
them
a
heads
up.
E
E
That
north
charleston
could
not
do
it
without
the
district
that
he
would
want
to
come
in
and
talk
with
with
the
committee,
so
that
that's
my
my
my
thinking
on
there,
but
but
my
my
inclination
is
to
say
that
we
would
not
benefit
from
these
tips
again,
the
the
one,
the
coliseum
one.
I
mean
that
that's
a,
I
think,
a
commercial,
commercially
viable
area
already
and
and
then
the
other
one,
the
re,
the
one
on
remount
I
mean.
E
I
agree
that
the
area
needs
to
be
redeveloped,
but
the
commercial
piece
there
so
so
tiny,
I'm
not
sure
where
we
would
get
the
the
benefit
from
it,
but
but
then
the
the
idea
that
we
we,
the
committee
and
staff,
could
benefit
from
having
gone
through.
This
type
of
analysis,
I
think,
is
valuable
because
I
couldn't.
I
would
assume
that
this
is
not
the
only
test
request
we
would
get
in
the
you
know.
This
won't
stop
us
stop
just
from
coming
in.
A
Well,
I
guess
the
the
the
question
becomes
is:
could
is
it
possible
that
the
analysis
could
change
anybody's
mind
about
whether
to
participate
or
not?
I
mean.
D
A
Really
strong
numbers
for
me
to
feel
like
these
are
beneficial
and
and
and-
and
so
you
know
again
as
a
a
good
corporate
citizen,
letting
them
know
that,
if
we're
using
their
money
to
do
the
analysis,
you
know
there's
a
silly
good
likelihood
that
we
wouldn't
participate,
I
mean
just
to
be.
I
would
love
to
go
through
that
process.
Just
like
it
said.
B
A
A
E
We
should
we
would
participate
in
either
one
of
these-
I
I
think
it
might
be.
You
know
it
might
be
an
issue
to
try
and
have
someone.
You
know
north
charleston
pay
for
this
and
within,
like
you
said,
and
we
know
we're
not
we're
not
probably
not
going
to
do
it,
and
I
would
also
say
that
I
would
expect
at
some
point
we
would
get
a
request
for
a
much
larger
tif
and
then
and
then
there
would
be
an
opportunity
for
a
real,
a
real
learning
around
the
analysis.
A
C
I
would
make
a
motion
that
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
do
proceed
with
the
analysis
that
that
would
be
my
motion.
I
don't
know
if
it
needs
to
be
a
motion,
but
I
would
separately
notify
folks
that
we
that
I
I
believe
it
is
the
general
consensus
of
this
committee
that
is,
is
not
inclined
towards
the
tiff.
Does
it
give
them
the
heads
up,
but
that
we'll
go
through
the
analysis
to
be
to
before
we
make
a
conclusion.
G
F
E
For
by
the
mccleston
municipality,
and
so
we
would
tell
we
would
have
to
inform-
I
think,
north
charleston,
that
that
we
were
asking
that
we're
asking
them
to
pay
for
the
analysis,
and
then
someone
will
be
upfront
saying
that
right
now
the
the
the
policy
of
the
board
is
not
to
participate,
and
so
right
now
we
don't
have
any
justification,
and
then
there
won't
have
been
strong,
leaning
towards
that.
D
C
A
Yeah
is
everybody
good
with
that?
Well,
we've
got
a
motion
a
second
any
further
questions.
A
Okay,
so
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
risk
assessment
plan
don
and
wayne.
F
Davis,
you
know
just
briefly
committee
on
the
I.t
risk
assessment
audit.
As
I
indicated
earlier,.
E
They
briefed
the
audience
on
this
committee
on
the
procurement
audit.
A
couple
months
ago
wayne
I
met
a
couple
times
to
take
a
look
at
all
the
findings,
with
the
finance
recommendations
and
best
practice,
suggestions
that
earlier
davis
had,
and
I
want
to.
F
So
I'm
gonna
go
through
all
the
details.
What
you
recall
there
were
around,
I
think.
E
13
to
15
recommendations
in
our
best
practice
suggestions,
and
so
what
wayne
has
done
he's
created
this
matrix
here.
That
indicates
all
of
the
audit
areas,
each
audit
area,
the
specific
recommendations.
So
the
recommendations
shown
here
are
from
from
the
audit
report,
our
ccsd's
plan
to
for
correction
and
then
the
status
or
the
expected
completion
date,
and
so
again
I'm
going
to
go
through
each
each
one.
E
But
this
matrix
is
in
three
three
different
sections
of
the
first
part
here
generally
those
things
where
the
artist
has
the
auditors
recommended
that
we
do
more
monitoring
so
by
creating
checklists,
making
modifications
to
our
checklist,
making
slight
modifications
to
our
processes,
and
so
those
things
have
been
completed.
As
you
can
see,
the
completion
dates
here
back
in
june
and
july
and
then
the
second
area.
E
Their
recommendation
is
that
we
consider
the
district
consider
automating
some
of
that
through
a
software
software
solution
called
the
vendor
bid
management
solution,
and
so
what
the
the
plan
here
that
we
have
is
to
so
this
will
be
come
at
a
cost,
so
it's
not
in
the
fr2
budget
and
so
the
plans
for
us
to
develop
a
scope
of
work
to
get
to
some
quotes
of
what
we
expect.
E
A
solution
with
a
electronic
solution
might
be
potentially
and
then
bring
that
as
a
recommendation
to
the
budget
for
fy23,
so
that
would
be
next
spring
and
then
with
the
implementation
next
next
next
fiscal
year,
if
that
pans
out
in
terms
of
the
viability
of
the
cost.
So
that's
on
the
vendor
management
and
then
the
third
and
final
area
here,
governor's
governance
and
oversight,
that's
primarily
making
sure
that
we
have
the
right
procedural
manuals
in
place
in
which,
in
which
cases
case
cases.
E
In
some
cases
we
do
not,
and
so
we
have
dates
for
that.
The
first
one
here
october
30
next
month
and
then
the
second
one
going
into
later
in
the
fall-
and
I
think
there's
one
here
that
goes
also
into
next
spring
next
winter.
For
this
time
of
winter,.
A
I'd
kind
of
like
to
see
a
periodic
report
would
y'all
be
in
agreement
with
that,
just
like
a
follow-up
on
a
quarterly
basis
to
make
sure
that
everything
that
is
supposed
to
get
taken
care
of
is
taken
care
of.
Are
you
guys,
okay,
with.
G
A
Works,
okay,
so
could
we
ask
that
y'all
would
come
back
to
us,
maybe
on
a
quarterly
basis.
A
A
Okay,
all
right
that
was
provided
for
information,
the
I.t
there
committee
tom,
are
you
still
on
winner.
L
Yes,
ma'am
good
afternoon,
so
we
had
a
great
meeting.
We
had
a
basically
an
indoctrination
of
our
new
members.
We
welcomed
in
about
paul
gilson,
doug,
lauer
and
charles
monteith,
and
we
also
introduced
a
new
staff
member
that
we
have
for
our
virtual
information
security
officer.
We've
been
trying
to
post
that
position
for
a
long
period
of
time,
and
we
talked
about
it
several
times
and
we
just
thought
it
was.
L
Somebody
than
nobody,
so
we
have
now
a
contracting
position
who
is
in
probably
eight
hours
a
week,
and
he
is
helping
us
out
with
that
information
security.
A
lot
of
the
things
that
the
audit
has
has
pointed
out
so
for
the
audit
plans.
My
my
plan
is
for
next
month's
meeting
to
add
this
to
the
agenda
to
share
what
the
audit
findings
were
and
what
we've
already
started
to
mitigate
and
ask
for
confirmation
how
to
proceed
based
on
the
threat
vectors
that
we're
seeing
now
in
the
especially
in
the
education
field.
L
So
we
quickly
went
over
the
steering
committee
charter,
so
everyone
understood
who
we
were
what
we
were
all
about,
what
the
members
meant
and
kind
of
our
mission.
We
went
over
just
a
district
overview
and
the
I.t
structure
of
all
of
our
departments
and
answered
some
questions
based
on
that
and
then
we
went
over
all
of
our
budgets
and
our
initiatives
using
those
budgets,
and
so
they
were
pretty
happy
with
what
they
saw
surprised
by
some
of
the
things
that
we
were
able
to
accomplish.
Yeah,
I
see
it.
L
Security
update
was
a
big
conversation
and
it's
just
becoming
more
and
more.
We
discussed.
L
Threat
is
our
users
that
we
need
to
do
more:
individual
user
training
for
security
awareness.
We
talked
about
the
virtual
network
security
officer
and
what
his
rules
were
specifically
and
then
what
our
security
posture
was.
What
are
we
doing
in
today's
threat
environment?
So
we
went
over
all
of
our
security
appliances,
all
of
the
software
that
we
use
and
some
of
our
practices
and
so
we'll
be
working
in
conjunction
a
good
timing
of
all.
This
was
that
we
have
a
new
software
in
place
with
our
virtual
information
security
officer.
L
It's
called
arctic
wolf
and
it
is
an
audit
compliant
software.
It
scans
our
networks
for
all
of
those
logs.
When
the
last
time
a
log
was
opened
all
of
our
change
management,
so
it
is
specifically
designed
to
help
point
out
those
things
that
auditors
will
be
looking
for.
So
that
was
quite
a
quite
a
good
thing.
We
did
it
once
around.
Mr
lauer
was
his
background.
Is
in
software,
so
he
had
a
big
discussion
about.
L
Are
we
really
looking
at
the
vulnerability
of
some
of
our
third-party
software
apps
and
software
sites
that
we
have
for
our
classrooms
and
around
the
district?
So
he
has
some
good
input
about
that.
He
wants
some
information
sent
back
to
him,
and
that
was
a
pretty
good
discussion.
L
Mr
duke
recommended
that
we
visit
some
of
our
schools
for
our
committee
members
and
that
we
would
have
possibly
our
new
or
our
next
meeting
in
one
of
our
high
schools
just
so
that
they
can
do
that.
I
understand
that
we're
trying
to
limit
the
amount
of
visits
that
we're
having
so
we're
still
discussing
that
piece.
L
Talking
about
our
cloud-based
approach,
trying
to
get
stuff
off
of
our
on-premise
hardware
kind
of
reduces
the
risk
a
little
bit,
removing
all
the
old
telephone
hardware
and
installing
the
new
that's
going
well
and
failing
over.
So
we
have
duplicate,
I
internet
circuits,
going
out
to
the
internet
so
that
if
school
goes
down
off
their
main
att
line,
we
have
a
comcast
line
now
getting
ready
to
be
turned
on
and
we
took
a
data
center
tour
and
that
went
pretty
well
pretty.
Well,
so
that's
about
it
any
questions.
A
A
I
do
not
whatever
you
guys
decide,
it's
fine
steven.
Do
you
well,
I'm
sure
stephen
will
give
you
his
input.
D
I
mean
we
think
quarterly,
because
if
we
go
monthly
we
don't
you
know
we
could
go
monthly.
Something
comes
up
and
you
know
tom
took
my
idea
about.
You
know
our
next
meeting
going
through
the
audit
findings
and
you
know
providing
you
know.
I
was
going
to
write
an
email
because
some
of
the
findings
he
has
are
the
same
ones.
You
know
as
a
virtual
k-12
school
I've
gone
through
so
and
there's
be
other
team
members
on
our
committee.
That
can,
you
know,
provide
some
input
to
help
them
get.
Those
findings
easily
mitigated
right.
A
L
A
B
Yes,
thank
you
and
good
afternoon
I'd
like
to
present
the
draft
july
capital
projects
report
our
revenue
collections
for
the
2017-2022
building
program
for
june,
or
2.8
million
dollars
above
the
two
percent
cash
flow
model
we
had
a
great
month.
The
expenditures
for
the
2010
through
2016
capital
building
program
were
zero
in
july,
and
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
typically
july
expenditures
are
lower
because
we
need
to
accrue
all
the
june
expenditures
in
our
fiscal
year.
21.
B
F
F
Green,
so
this
is
not
the
typical
month
of
financial
state
financial
report,
as,
as
you
all
know,
we're
closing
the
books
for
fiscal
year
201.
So
we
have
a
number
of
objections,
detailed
projections
to
make
we
should
be
actually
physically
closing
the
system.
We
should
be
on
track
to
do
that
this
week,
with
the
external
audit
firm,
green
finney
coming
in.
E
Next
week
on
site
to
conduct
the
finalized
art
audit
steps
and
then
they'll
proceed
from
there
to
the
financial
statements
that
would
be
resent
hopefully
to
the
audience
finance
committee
on
draft
format
in
november.
But
what
I
have
on
the
screen
here
is
to
show
what
we
project
our
year
in
position
would
be
well
as
it
relates
to
the
fund
balance.
E
First
line
june
30th
2020.,
so
the
current
financial
statements,
the
ones
that
were
issued
for
fiscal
year
20
we
had
145.2
million
dollars
in
fund
balance.
So
so
that's
our
those
are
audited
numbers
that
first
line
the
projected
revenues
for
fiscal
year
21.
E
We
have
budgeted
538.7
million,
we're
coming
in
significantly
over
budget
574.7
million
dollars
those
revenues.
Those
excess
revenues
of
a
budget
are
generated
primarily
from
two
areas.
One
is
the
local
revenue
from
property
taxes.
E
As
you
all
know,
the
the
the
the
budgeting
for
that
is
very,
very
conservative,
both
from
the
standpoint
of
the
county
auditor's
office
in
in
their
estimates
of
the
the
growth
of
assessed
property
values,
as
well
as
the
districts
of
the
districts
of
taking
a
look
at
a
conservative
approach
for
for
revenue
and
in
addition
to
the
local
revenue.
E
If
you
recall,
when
we
developed
the
budget
for
fiscal
year
21
in
the
spring
of
last
year,
2020,
there
was
so
much
uncertainty
around
the
state
revenue
because
of
the
beginning,
due
to
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic,
so
our
level
of
conservatism
went
extreme
and
we
estimated
that
the
state
revenue
would
be
would
be
would
be
reduced
when
in
fact
it
remained
the
same
as
the
previous
year,
and
so
we
we
approved
the
additional
13
million
dollars
that
we
did
not.
E
We
did
not
budget
for
so
we
had
a
significant
increase
in
revenues.
We
had
a
slight
actual
expenditures
that
were
over
budget
very
slightly,
and
that
was
driven
exclusively
by
the
fact
that
you
know
the
board
approved
two
two
bonuses
for
all
staff
last
year.
That
was
because
of
the
work
of
workload.
The
pandemic,
that
was,
those
those
salaries,
were
not
budgeted,
and
so
that's
what
drove
us
over
the
expenditure
budget.
E
What's
what's
most
important
here
is
that
for
the
fiscal
year
21
budget,
the
district
had
planned
on
using
33.9
million
dollars
of
fund
balance,
33.9
million
fund
balance.
So
we
had
planned
on
drawing
down
145
million
fund
balance
by
33.9
to
balance
the
budget,
and
we
have
a
a
budgeted
fund
balance
for
the
end
of
fiscal
year.
21
of
this
111
million
dollars,
11.4
million
dollars,
but
the
fact
that
we
use
no
front
bounce
because
of
the
excess
revenue,
so
zero
fund
balance
was
used.
E
So
we
in
fact
will
end
the
year
fiscal
year,
21
projected
at
roughly
the
same
amount
of
fund
balance
that
we
had
in
fiscal
year
20..
So,
instead
of
going
down
to
111.4
million
dollars,
we
project
that
we
will
be
at
145.5
million
dollars
and
those
and
these
numbers
of
rejection.
That
was
changed.
But
I
don't.
I
do
not
anticipate
any
significant,
any
significant
changes
and
then,
in
terms
of
the.
E
Year,
I
don't,
I
don't
bring
financial
statement,
monthly
financial
statements
to
the
committee
for
the
first
first,
two
or
three
months.
We
wait
until
the
end
of
the
first
quarter.
No
teachers
don't
come
in
until
mid
to
late
august,
so
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
expenditures
on
the
books.
So
we'll
have
our
first
report
to
the
to
the
committee
for
fiscal
year.
21
results
if
you
fiscally
have
22
results
at
the
end
of
the
first
quarter.
A
Okay,
if
not,
that
concludes
the
open
session.
We
have
three
items
to
consider
in
executive
session,
so
unless
there
are
any
further
questions
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
go
into
executive
session.
I
A
So
everybody
is
excused
except
the
community
members
and
whoever.
A
We
had
some
items
for
discussion,
no
folks
were
taken
in
executive
session,
but
I
will
now
entertain
a
vote
on
district
one
contractual
matter
regarding
lincoln,
lincoln,
middle
school,
lincoln,
high
school.
G
J
A
Opposed,
okay
and
the
next
matter
is
a
contractual
matter
concerning
mcclellandville
elementary
school
they're,
also
in
district
one
of
the
medicaid
emotion.
C
Mostly,
we
extend
the
lease
approve,
extending
the
lease
to
june
23,
but
but
with
the
understanding
that
there's,
an
expectation
that
we
were
going
to
have,
you
know
need
to
be
in
a
position
to
make
other
use
of
the
site
thereafter.
I
F
A
Next
item
we
have
is
the
to
determine
the
board
agenda
items
somehow.
I
think
they
are
already
on
there
because
we
are
meeting
after
the
committee
of
the
poll,
but
john
you've
got
five
number
four
five,
six.
F
E
So
I
think
that
wouldn't
go
to
the
board
this
this
month,
because
we
have
to
have
the
analysis,
so
that
would
not
go
no
right
yeah,
so
so
we're
not
making
a
recommendation
to
the
board.
Yet:
okay,
okay,
okay,
the
risk
assessment
for
I.t.
F
The
I'm
not
coming
whether
the
oversight
committee's
still-
I
don't
think
that
goes
with
the
month
of
capital
projects.
The
monthly
financial
report
in
the
three
contractual
matters.
A
Okay,
next
meeting
is
october
5th
at
2
o'clock.
Thanks
to
everyone
great
meeting,
I
will.