►
From YouTube: Chattanooga City Council Agenda Session - 9/12/23
Description
Chattanooga City Council Agenda Session - 9/12/23
A
B
Of
3
30
agenda
session
to
order
can
I
have
approval
on
a
minute.
Second,
okay,
minute
stand
without
objection.
Council.
If
you
would
take
a
look
at
your
agenda
for
this
evening,
we
have
final
ordinances
on
the
final
reading.
Buffalo
public
works
with
District
8..
We
have
ordinances
on
the
first
reading,
which
will
be
covered
in
planning
committee
resolution.
Oh
sorry,
Council,
councilman,
Henderson,.
A
We
have
something
tonight
that,
as
far
as
I
know,
it's
the
first
that
we've
ever
had
and
that's
before
our
order
of
business
actually
starts.
We
have
a
form-based
code
that
appeals
hearing
tonight
right.
Oh
yes
and
I
would
like
to
confirm
the
process
of
that
hearing
be
handled
just
like
a
zoning
case.
Where
and
and
in
this
case
the
who
we
typically
refer
to
as
an
applicant.
A
Would
that
be
the
wing,
Fields
yeah,
and
so
the
opposition
would
be
anybody
that
would
be
in
opposition
to
I
guess
what
the
form-based
code
committee
approved
is.
B
That
correct,
yes,
so
be
seven,
seven
minutes
for
the
applicant,
which
would
be
the
wing
Fields
nine
minutes
for
anyone
in
opposition,
okay
and
then
two
minutes
for
the
applicants.
A
The
opposition
could
be
anybody
in
the
public.
That's
right
now,
the
the
okay
forget,
the
the
people
that
are
in
opposition,
the
fields.
A
B
Thank
you
ma'am.
Thank
you
all
right,
all
right,
ordinances
under
I'm,
sorry,
final
reading,
first
reading
they'll
be
covered
in
planning
and
Zoni
any
questions
about
resolutions.
Councilman
leopard,
chair.
D
E
Thank
you,
councilman
we're
asking
for
one
more
week.
Deferral
on
this.
We
have
had
some
continued
conversation
on
the
items
here,
but
there's
one
in
particular
and
1.4
around
policies
for
accredited
departments
and
making
sure
we
we
just
want
to
make
sure
we
get
that
language
right
so
that
our
HR
department
is
aware
of
any
of
those
policies
that
are
being
added
or
changed
in
those
departments
and
that
we're
working
well
together.
E
But
councilman,
Ledford
and
I
had
a
meeting
on
that
today
and
I
think
we
have
come
to
a
good
resolution
on
that,
but
just
want
to
give
us
one
more
week
to
make
sure
that
language
is
exactly
right.
All.
D
Right,
thank
you
and
Julia.
Thank
you
for
and
Daniel
for
you
I,
don't
know.
I
saw
him
a
minute
ago.
There
you
are
Daniel.
Thank
you
for
our
meeting
as
well.
I
think
we're
all
in
sync,
with
the
right
hand,
knowing
what
the
left
hand
is
doing
and
I
think
that's
a
better
way
to
govern
when
we're
all
aware
of.
What's
going
on
so
I
appreciate
the
information
and
the
collaboration
so
we'll.
E
D
B
One
week:
deferral
until
September
19th
for
that
item,
all
right,
Council,
any
other
questions,
resolutions
Economic
Development.
We
cover
Human,
Resources
police,
Public,
Works.
Any
questions
on
next
week's
next
week's
proposed
agenda
items.
We
got
councilman
Henderson,
followed
me
by
Madame
Vice,
chair
Hill,.
A
Under
the
mayor's
office
creation
of
this
advisory
commission
all
right,
it's
going
to
be
the
next
week
before
we
actually
have
a
parks
and
Public
Works
committee
and
I
would
like
a
presentation
on
this
first
before
I
had
to
vote
in
on
it
on
the
same
day
and
I
guess.
A
My
question
is:
is
since
this
is
on
the
proposed
two-week
agenda,
if
we
could
hear
it
in
committee
next
week
and
have
it
placed
on
the
agenda
for
the
26th
that
way
we're
not
having
the
vote
on
it
on
the
same
day,
we
have
it
in
committee
that
way.
If
we
have
further
questions
about
it,
we
can
follow
up
and
have
a
week
to.
B
All
right
that
works
with
me,
councilman
Henderson,
so
we'll
hear
this
in
the
Parks
and
Public
Works
committee
next
week,
and
then
this
will
be
on
the
September
26th
agenda,
hello.
A
As
far
as
what
it'll
consist
of
thoughts
behind
it,
yes.
G
H
Sure
heal
I
actually
had
similar
questions
to
councilman
Henderson.
So
that's
all
well.
B
Thank
you
all
right
under
or
reading
any
questions
about,
Public
Works.
B
I'm
sorry,
the
wrong
one
I
apologize
next,
any
other
questions
about
next
week's
proposed
agenda
right,
any
purchasing
questions
we
have
14
purchases
today,
so
any
questions
all
right.
Future
considerations.
If
you
take
a
look
at
that,
the
items
that
you
have
questions
about,
please
get
your
life.
B
Oh,
we
don't
have
any
departmental
reports
today.
We
do
have
two
committees,
affordable
housing
committee
and
planning
and
zoning
committee
today,
following
those
meetings,
if
time
allows,
we
will
have
an
attorney
client
meeting
after
this
month.
So
there
are
no
other
questions.
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Madame
Vice,
chair.
H
H
Today
we
have
the
privilege
of
getting
a
presentation
on
the
market
value
analysis,
which
is
really
the
the
final
large
piece
of
the
puzzle
for
our
three-legged
stool
to
remain
use
that
three-legged
stool
example
with
me
recently
of
the
different
pieces
that
we
need
for
our
long-term
strategy
to
address
housing:
affordability
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
so
I'd
like
to
welcome
our
chief
housing
officer,
Nicole
up
to
the
podium
and
Nicole.
If
you
want
to
fill
us
in
on
how
we're
going
to
proceed
this
afternoon,
absolutely.
F
We
will
in
front
of
you
in
May
with
the
reinvestment
fund,
who
gave
you
a
preview
of
the
market,
value
analysis
and
preliminary
findings.
They
have
concluded
their
analysis
and
are
here
today
to
prevent
to
present
to
you
the
the
final
findings
of
the
market
value
analysis.
It's
an
abbreviated
presentation,
I'll
be
handing
out
the
full
presentation
for
you
and
then
the
final
presentation.
We
will
also
Post
online
so
that
you'll
have
access
to
it
as
well.
F
The
public
it
is
compelling
and
I
am
very
grateful
for
the
work
that
went
into
this.
We
we
now
know
the
number
of
units
that
we
need
today
and
in
the
future,
we
now
have
the
housing
action
plan.
That's
going
to
give
us
the
policies
and
tools
to
address
those
needs
and
with
today's
presentation
the
market
value
analysis
will
understand
where
we
need
to
make
our
investments
and,
and
why
and
so
with
that,
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Ira
Goldstein
of
the
reinvestment
one
who
will
present.
Thank
you
so
much.
G
Thank
you
Nicole
good
afternoon,
everybody,
my
audible,
I,
guess
sure.
Well,
it's
my
pleasure
and
honor
to
be
here
today,
both
on
behalf
of
our
organization,
reinvestment
fund
and
my
teammate
Jessica
warneros,
and
our
partner
in
this
work.
Karen
Black.
What
I'm
going
to
show
you
today
is
the
completion
of
this
market
value
analysis
and
hopefully
stimulate
some
ideas
for
you
about
how
to
think
about
its
utility
going
forwards.
G
These
are
the
assumptions
upon
which
this
analysis
is
based,
but
I'd
like
to
focus
in
on
just
one
of
these
bullet
points,
and
that
is,
you
are
going
to
see
a
mapping
of
the
city
of
Chattanooga
that
takes
all
of
the
little
puzzle
pieces
of
the
city
and
puts
them
into
a
set
of
market-based
categories.
The
purpose
of
that
in
creating
those
categories
is
to
identify
what
the
characteristics
of
the
market
are.
It
is
not
to
say,
invest
in
these
places
and
avoid
these
places
cases
our
philosophy
in
creating
it.
G
The
way
we
do
is
predicated
on
the
notion
of
building
from
strength,
so,
while
you'll
see
a
characterization
of
all
the
markets
of
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
the
idea
is
to
think
about
those
Investments
and
these
programs
and
other
kinds
of
things
that
you're
doing
with
an
eye
towards
let's
figure
out
where
there
are
strengths
that
we
can
invest
into
again,
so
that
the
impact
can
sort
of
spread
out
oftentimes.
A
note
of
strength
could
be
one
of
your
sort
of
extraordinary
natural
resources
like
River
views
or
Mountain
views
or
things
of
that
nature.
G
It
could
be
a
job
cluster,
it
could
be
a
Confluence
of
public
transportation,
but
also
it
could
be
an
adjacent,
strong,
real
estate
market
and
because
we
do
this
analysis
at
a
very
small
geography.
Those
adjacencies
can
be
thought
of
as
those
nodes
of
strength
upon
which
to
build.
So
there
are
other
sort
of
pieces
of
how
we
do
why
we
do
what
we
do
in
this
analysis,
but
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
emphasize
that
one
in
particular.
G
G
We
use
a
series
of
market
indicators
and
these
are
the
same
kinds
of
indicators
that
perhaps
an
investor
might
use
and
that's
how
we
came
up
with
the
the
set
of
ingredients
to
this
to
this
analysis.
But
it's
things
like
what
are
homes
selling
for
what
about
the
variability
in
those
prices?
Where
do
we
set?
G
It
see
evidence
of
new
construction
and
renovation
permitting
also,
where
are
the
stressors
things
like
vacancy
foreclosure,
inability
to
pay
utility
bills,
utility
shutoffs
and
then
some
characteristics
of
the
housing
stock,
like
its
density,
where
that
subsidized
rental
housing
is
and
the
owner
occupancy?
And
it's
all
of
those
pieces
together
for
all
the
little
puzzle
pieces
of
Chattanooga
that
allow
us
to
to
develop
the
analysis
that
we
do
this.
G
Is
we
really
showed
you
on
a
map
in
a
second,
but
you
will
see
a
Ness
a
table
that
has
letters
in
the
rows
and
then
variables
along
the
columns.
Each
of
the
columns
are
the
different
indicators
of
the
market.
Each
of
the
rows
are
the
different
markets
and
you
will
see
a
mapping
where
you'll
see
purple
and
blue
and
yellow
and
orange,
and
the
like
around
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
the
characteristics
that
you
see
in
the
cells.
The
intersection
of
those
rows
and
cons
are
the
typical
block
group
within
that
category.
G
So
these
markets
are
set
up
so
that
there's
as
much
separation
between
those
markets
and
as
much
commonality
within
them.
So
if
you
see
purple
anywhere
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
the
purples
are
more
or
less
the
same
as
markets
go.
But
when
you
see
a
blue,
you
know
that
that's
different
from
purple
and
just
to
highlight
a
few
differences,
for
example
your
A
and
B
markets.
Those
are
your
two
very
strongest
real
estate
markets
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga.
G
They
largely
differ
in
that
one
is
very
much
a
home
ownership
market
and
one
is
a
very
much
a
renter
occupied
Market,
both
very
strong
real
estate
markets.
If
you
make
your
way
through
the
middle
markets,
the
C's,
the
D's,
the
E's
you'll,
see
there
are
different
price
points.
There
are
different
tenure
structures,
there's
different
levels
of
investment
and
vacancy
and
the
like.
G
So
the
idea
is
to
create
these
strata
again
so
that
they
are
as
similar
within
and
as
different
across,
and
this
is
that
mapping
I'd
like
to
draw
your
attention
to
a
couple
things
on
this
map.
Firstly,
again,
wherever
you
see,
purple
or
blue,
all
purples
will
look
very
much
the
same
from
a
market
perspective,
but
they
will
look
different
than
blue
different
from
yellow
Etc.
G
G
The
top
of
those
ridges
look
very
different
than
as
you
make
your
way
down
those
Hills,
and
so
what
we
did
is
we
physically
split
the
geographies
that
the
census
use
gives
us
to
use
for
this
analysis
so
that
you
can
actually
see
with
even
finer
resolution
what
those
real
estate
markets
look
like
in
some
instances,
we
split
those
markets
in
two.
In
some
instances
we
split
them
in
three,
and
sometimes
you
find
literally
three
different
things
going
on
in
a
very
small
area,
so
draw
your
attention
to
that.
G
Also
draw
your
attention
to
this
I'd
mention
that
logic
of
building
from
strength
and
I
said
that
sometimes
strength
is
an
adjacent
real
estate
market
that
is
stronger
than
the
market
that
you're
looking
at
look
for
places,
for
example,
where
you
have
Blues
next
to
yellow
or
purples
next
to
Orange.
Those
are
places
where
Investments
to
sort
of
draw
the
strength
across
those
boundaries
can
have
more
of
a
contagion
effect
on
the
areas
around
it,
and
that
is
that
logic
of
building
from
strength.
G
Of
course,
there's
other
strengths
that
you
would
look
at
a
strong
School,
Park
system,
Library
community-based
Association,
other
kinds
of
things,
but
certainly
those
those
adjacencies
are
going
to
be
important
for
you
here.
What
we
wanted
to
do
is
to
respect
your
geographies
as
council
members
and
show
you
where
those
geographies
are,
and
one
of
the
things
that's
really
interesting
and
is
not
uncommon
in
cities
that
we
work
is
city
council
boundaries.
First
of
all,
they
tend
to
be
a
little
bit
unusual.
G
Let's
say
in
every
city
that
you
work
in
virtually
every
city
council
District
across
the
city,
you'll
have
three
or
four
or
five
different
Market
types.
It's
the
very
extreme
example
where
you
don't
see
at
least
three
or
four
from
very
strong
to
more
challenged
real
estate
markets.
G
So
all
of
you
are
confronting
in
your
everyday
work
as
District
Council
Members,
a
variety
of
conditions
within
your
council
districts,
and
this
will
help
you
differentiate
that,
as
you
sort
of
think
about
where
your
calls
are
coming
from
within
your
districts,
I
said
that
we
did
incorporate
building
permitting
activity
into
into
the
analysis.
These
data
are
oftentimes.
You
have
to
be
very
careful
in
the
analysis
of
them,
but
you
should
know
that
building
permits
don't
always
translate
into
actual
units
constructed,
but
these
are
the
official
building
permit
numbers
out
of
the
city.
G
G
If
you
sort
of
look
across
cities,
particularly
as
the
cost
of
construction
has
gone
up
and
the
cost
of
land
has
gone
up
it,
there
is
a
tendency
to
focus
in
the
expense
into
the
areas
where
that
return
can
be
observed
in
the
sale
prices
and
the
properties.
G
This
is
your
MVA
map,
but
each
one
of
those
little
dots
represents
a
sighted
assisted
housing
development,
so
in
other
words,
not
a
housing
Choice
voucher
where
people
can
sort
of
pick
up
and
move
whenever
it
is
that
their
tenancy
changes,
but
these
are
places
that
will
remain
affordable
for
some
specified
period
of
time.
Important
to
note
a
few
things
about
this,
you
have
several
of
these
cited
assisted
housing
units
in
some
really
strong
real
estate
markets.
G
That's
important
because
public
policy
at
the
national
level
and
at
most
local
levels
has
been
really
focused
on
the
idea
of
making
sure
that
people
who
are
of
modest
means
have
access
to
the
benefits
that
accrue
to
some
stronger
neighborhoods
a
little
safer,
perhaps
little
better
schools.
Perhaps
a
variety
of
other
things
that
you
observe
you
do
have
assisted
housing
in
those
areas.
G
Now
you
also
have
a
lot
of
assisted
housing
concentrated
in
some
of
the
more
sort
of
middle
and
challenged
markets,
but
what
I
would
submit
to
you
is
some
of
the
areas,
as
we
see
in
a
later
slide
are
not
only
strong
or
modest
but
they're
under
a
lot
of
pressure
to
change
economically.
The
fact
that
you
have
this
cited
public
housing
there
or
assisted
housing.
There
is
really
important
because
it
gives
you
a
node
to
hold
on
to
so
that
these
assisted
units
can
remain
in
places
as
those
places
experience,
Market
uplift.
G
Here
what
I'd
like
to
like
to
do
is
just
to
sort
of
wet
your
appetite.
As
Nicole
said,
you
have
a
new
plan,
you
have
a
new
set
of
tools
that
are
available
to
you.
This
is,
let's
call
it
a
hypothetical.
What
we
wanted
to
do
is
to
express
to
you
that
the
work
going
forward
is
to
sort
of
think
about
all
those
things
that
you
do.
G
Tests
pilot
lie,
Tech
down
payment
assistant
and
for
those
things
for
which
there
is
a
geographic
anchor
think
about
how
it
is
that
you
want
to
sort
of
connect
those
activities
to
the
conditions
of
the
market
and
where
you
want
to
prioritize
I'll.
Give
you
one
very
simple
example
just
to
hold
in
your
minds
as
you
think,
about
working
with
this.
G
We
do
this
work
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
the
foundations,
the
city
government,
the
Community
Development
activity
organizations
got
together
and
created
literally
a
point
system
that
sort
of
used
the
MVA
the
market
analysis
that
we
did
from
there
to
prioritize
where
they
wanted
subsidy
to
go
because
it
met
one
or
another
condition
of
what
they
were
trying
to
achieve
with
their
Investments.
So
this
is
really
just
the
beginning.
To
think
about.
This
is
what's
your
homework
over
the
next
several
months
is
how
do
we
connect
these
things,
and
how
do
we
prioritize
these
things?
G
Given
the
conditions
of
the
market?
I
know
I'm
running
long,
so
I'm
going
to
go
pretty
quick
through
here.
I,
don't
want
to
sort
of
overstay
my
welcome.
Firstly,
the
demographics.
One
of
the
things
you
will
notice
is
certainly
the
A
and
B
markets
tend
to
be
overwhelmingly
home
to
people
who
are
white,
not
Hispanic.
The
bee
markets,
on
the
other
hand
of
the
pair,
do
tend
to
show
a
little
bit
more
racial
integration,
but
you
also
see
a
fair
amount
of
integration
in
those
C
and
D
markets,
and
even
so
in
those
e-markets.
G
That
is
not
terribly
uncommon.
As
we
go
from
City
to
City.
These
integrated
Middle
Market
areas
stand
as
the
kind
of
living
breathing
example
that
people
can
live
together
and
Thrive
and
have
good
neighborhood
conditions,
and
things
can
work.
It's
not
that
there
isn't
segregation
in
cities,
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
do
find-
and
we
find
here,
is
that
you're,
seeing
a
little
bit
more
integration
in
those
middle
markets
which
we
think
are
really.
G
G
If
you
don't
make
more
than
that,
the
gray
areas
are
Out
Of
Reach
for
you,
but
every
other
place
is
available,
so
at
141
000
most
of
the
city
of
Chattanooga
is
available
to
you,
but
now
I'm
going
to
sort
of
take
those
incomes
down
and
you
can
see
how
much
less
of
Chattanooga
is
available
to
you.
So
this
is
200
percent
141
000.
This
is
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
a
year.
G
So
if
you
make
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
a
year
roughly
what's
available
to,
you
is
just
that
which
is
not
grayed
out
and
at
a
hundred
percent,
which
is
the
typical
family
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
making
seventy
thousand
six
hundred
and
forty
five
dollars
what's
left
actually
are
some
of
the
more
stress
markets
or
some
of
the
blue
markets
that
are
really
geographically
at
a
distance
from
where
some
of
the
job
centers
are
particularly
for
the
city
and
then
at
80.
It
closes
down
more
and
at
fifty
percent.
G
What's
left
is
the
most
stress
to
the
markets,
I'd
like
to
think
of
this
series
as
the
geography
of
opportunity.
So
if
you
make
a
lot
of
money,
your
geography
is
expansive.
If
you
don't
make
much
money,
your
geography
is
very
limited
and
you
all
know
these
places
way
better
than
we
do
not.
When
we're
standing
all
the
days
that
we
spend
in
the
field.
We
know
that
those
markets
are
not
the
most
opportune
market.
G
So
if
you
sort
of
think
about
what
your
income
gives
you
it's
pretty
limited
now
is
this
more
limited
than
other
cities.
What
I
would
tell
you
is
when
we
did
this
in
your
sister
city
Nashville,
there
was
literally
like
one
block
group
in
the
entire
city
that
was
available,
so
here
there's
a
little
bit
more,
but
there's
not
a
lot
Pittsburgh,
perhaps
many
ways
very
similar
to
I.
Think
Chattanooga
with
between
the
you
know,
the
the
mountains
and
the
rivers
and
they're
like
has
a
little
bit
more
expansive.
G
So
you
all
are
sort
of
closing
up,
and
you
know
in
part:
that's
a
function
function
of
those
Rising
prices
and
the
relatively
flat
incomes,
but
that
geography
of
opportunity
is
constrained
and
it's
not
even
across
the
board.
If
you
look
at
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
Through
The
Eyes
of
a
white
family
white
families
tend
to
make
more
on
average
than
black
families
in
Chattanooga,
as
they
do
in
other
cities
as
well.
Here,
the
typical
white
family
earns
ninety
thousand
dollars.
G
This
is
what
you
see
if
you
want
to
sort
of
find
your
place
in
Chattanooga
as
a
white
family,
if
you
want
to
find
it
as
a
black
family,
very
much
less,
and
that's
because
black
families
make
much
less
on
average.
So
the
geography
of
opportunity
and
all
that
brings
for
you
and
for
your
family
is
way
more
constrained
if
you
are
a
person
of
color.
Lastly,
the
risk
of
economic
displacement
here,
what
we're
doing
is
we're
pulling
together
the
market
analysis
and
the
way
that
the
communities
have
changed
economically
over
the
last
couple
years.
G
G
Some
would
call
it
gentrification
I
like
to
just
call
it
economic
pressure.
Those
are
places
that
when
you
come
back
and
look
at
them,
if
you
don't
do
something
today,
two
or
three
years
from
now
the
nature
of
the
population
economically,
that
will
reside
in
those
places,
is
very
different
than
it
is
now,
because
the
prices
have
changed
and
are
changing
in
a
way
that
will
not
allow
similar
to
people
to
move
in.
G
So,
if
you
think
about
one
of
those
one
of
those
teal
areas,
if
it
was
home
to
teachers
and
firefighters
and
are
like
now
unless
their
their
incomes
go
up
way
faster
than
they
probably
will,
that
will
no
longer
be
home
to
teachers
and
firefighters,
Etc,
there's
one
little
block
group
down
in
the
southern
edge
of
the
city
that
has
a
brown
and
not
a
teal.
That
is
a
place
where
it's
not
like
an
economic
pressure,
but
an
economic
vacuum.
G
So
that's
one
area
in
the
city
that
is
in
that
middle
range,
that
is
in
danger
of
suffering
from
disinvestment,
and
that
is
a
place
where
you
sort
of
think
about
going
in
and
doing
a
set
of
things.
I
take
that
map,
as
somebody
who's
sort
of
worked,
and
you
know,
had
the
benefit
of
working
in
a
number
of
different
cities.
I
take
that
map
in
the
MVA
I
take
that
table
that
had
all
those
activities
and
I
say
now.
I
want
to
connect.
G
These
I
want
to
connect
a
set
of
preservation
activities
to
those
teal
areas.
I
want
to
create
a
set
of
activities
in
that
brown
area,
that's
designed
to
stabilize,
and
then
we
have
other
things
for
the
other
parts.
But
that
is
my
last
slide.
Oh
actually,
excuse
me.
This
shows
you
those
cited
public
housing
and
assisted
housing,
and
the
benefit
here
is
you
do
see
some
of
those
cited
housing
developments
in
those
teal
areas,
but
a
word
of
caution.
G
Those
cited
housing
developments
unless
their
Housing
Authority
properties
and
some
are,
and
some
aren't
will
have
an
expiration
and
across
the
country
when
the
expiration
hits.
If
that
market
has
gotten
way,
pricier
the
the
owners
of
those
properties
feel
it's
better
to
sort
of,
sell
them
and
make
you
know
to
cash
in
as
opposed
to
sort
of
keep
them
in
that
affordable
pool
of
units.
G
My
words
to
you,
for
whatever
their
worth,
is
to
focus
some
attention
on
that
cited
on
those
cited
properties
in
and
around
those
teal
areas,
because
if
they
have
expirations
you're
likely
to
lose
them
and
that
won't
be
to
the
advantage
of
the
community
or
the
people
that
live
within
them,
and
that
is
my
last
slide.
So
thank
you
very
much.
If
you
have
any
questions
happy
to
take
them,
but
I
appreciate
your
your
attention.
I
Thank
you
chair,
a
great
presentation.
Thank
you.
When
I
look
at
that
map,
it
really,
you
know,
I'm
excited
about
what
it
could
become,
but
it
also
makes
me
sad
because,
when
I
look
at
the
areas
that
I
represent,
I
can
still
see
the
red
lining
and
the
intentional
systemic
disinvestment
in
our
communities,
and
when
you
look
at
it
to
see
it
just
really
exposed
a
lot
of
style
stuff
in
that
map.
I
It's
not
just
about
housing
that
we
still
continue
to
ignore,
and
you
know
we
haven't
quite
got
the
niche
as
far
as
policy
wise.
What
we
actually
can
do
and
Implement
to
change
the
way
the
color
look
on
the
map.
I
I
live
in
that
darker
area,
the
Eastdale
community,
and
every
day,
when
I
check
my
mail
when
I
get
home,
I
got
a
flyer
that
says
we
will
purchase
your
home,
yes
for
whatever
amount
they
sending,
which
probably
could
be
at
least
about
ten
thousand
dollars
more
than
what
was
paid
for
from
the
beginning.
You
know,
and
when
you're
looking
at
the
other
markets,
where
would
I
live
if
I
was
just
in
need
and
sold?
I
My
home
instantly,
where
else
could
I
go
according
to
this
map
like
I'm,
bound
to
still
continue
to
live
in
a
distressed,
Community
Based?
On
my
you
know
my
income
level
and
just
the
areas
of
work
that
I
could
go,
but
it's
my
hope
that
this
isn't
just
a
presentation
that
we
present
in
the
city
council
today
that
we
will
begin
to
implement
the
necessary
policies
and
changes
that
need
to
happen
so
that
we
can
see
some
different
colors
on
the
map
and
actually
see
a
one
Chattanooga
frame
where
everybody
is
thriving.
That's.
G
They
work
out
quite
well,
and
so
communities
around
the
country
are
doing
things
like
creating
the
effective
car
Larry
like
to
a
Do
Not
Call
List,
like
you
can't
you
know,
bombard
people
to
say
you
want
to
buy
their
property.
The
city
of
Philadelphia
created
one
like
that.
Where
you
know
people
can
get
their
name
on
a
list
and
they
stop
getting
bothered.
B
All
right,
thank
you
so
much
again
for
the
presentation
and
I
do
Echo
the
sentiments.
Councilman,
coonrod
and
I
had
a
question
about
the
middle,
lagging
lagging
markets,
and
that's
why
I
live
so
because
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
on
what
that
is.
I
can
understand
the
you
know
the
stable.
You
know:
Middle
Market,
stable
week
markets,
but
middle
lag
and
lagging
markets,
because
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
what
that
is,
and
maybe
one
or
two
ways
to
to
make
that
better.
Yes,.
G
So
they
are,
you
know
not
the
strongest
markets,
they're
sort
of
in
the
middle
markets
or
the
places
that
have
some
stressors
in
them
that
second
lagging,
and
we
should
probably
get
better
labeling,
but
that
second
lagging
means
that
it's
sort
of
not
keeping
Pace
with
what's
happening
across
the
city
of
Chattanooga.
So
it's
in
one
of
those
middle
or
stressed
categories,
and
it's
starting
to
show
some
signs
of
relative
disinvestment.
So
what
do
you
do
in
places
like
that
in
places
like
that?
G
What
you're
looking
for
is
to
sort
of
in
a
targeted
way,
direct
the
kinds
of
preservation
dollars
and
preservation
programs?
That
sort
of
you
know
keep
the
market
from
falling
that
support
homeowners
as
they
be
perhaps
homeowners
as
they
begin
to
sort
of
find
it
difficult
to
maintain
their
homes.
You
know
be
it.
G
You
know
things
like
basic
systems
of
their
properties
like
the
roof,
the
heating,
the
plumbing,
the
electric
Etc
or
other
kinds
of
things
like
that
that
people
might
find
economically
challenging
to
do
on
their
own,
but
the
city
could
help
with
or
philanthropy
could
help
with
or
the
county
could
have.
You
know
whatever
that
there
are
other
options,
so
I
would
look
to
sort
of
preservation.
G
Kinds
of
activities
in
those
I
would
also
perhaps
look
at
whether
or
not
there
are
nodes
of
strength
that
can
be
propped
up
like
a
strong
civic
association
that
can
really
start
to
enhance
the
well-being
of
the
residents.
Is
there
a
library
in
the
neighborhood
that
could
be
more
of
a
community
node?
Is
there
a
Rec
Center
that
could
be
spruced
up
a
little
bit
so
that
people
sort
of
feel
good
about
sending
their
children
to
it?
H
All
right,
Ira
looks
like
the
board
is
clear.
I
I
do
appreciate
this
very
much.
One
of
the
things
I
notice
is
that
these
teal
areas
would
be
examples
I
think
of
some
of
our
remaining
naturally
occurring,
affordable
housing,
our
NOAA
properties.
So
we've
seen
other
communities
go
from
being
naturally
occurring,
affordable
housing
into
some
of
our
more
stable
markets,
but
these
are
places
where
we
currently
have
Workforce,
affordable
housing.
H
But
nonetheless,
if
we
don't
disaggregate
that
data
I
fear
that
we
will
be
focused
on,
we
could
lose
focus
on
moving
some
of
the
very
populations
and
providing
opportunity
for
populations
that
have
desperately
needed
it
for
so
very
long
which
takes
us
back
to
councilwoman
coonrod's
recommendation
of
us
looking
at
an
equity
framework
for
our
policy
making
so
Council,
we
have
a
work
session
scheduled
for
the
3rd
of
October.
That
is
going
to
be
in
lieu
of
our
strategic
planning.
So
it
will
start
at
two
o'clock.
H
The
public
is
welcome
to
join
us
for
that
we'll
be
in
the
conference
room
and
that's
when
we'll
start
looking
at
everything
as
a
group,
all
three
documents
and
I
could
see
us
beginning
to
build
out
that
Matrix
really
of
of
what
tools
work
where
and
and
how
we
will
implement
the
policies
and
subsidies
that
that
we
do
have
available
to
us.
So
thank
you
very
much
looks
like
the
board
is
quiet
for
now,
but
I'm
sure
that
we
will
have
many
questions
for
Nicole
moving
forward.
Thank
you.
H
D
If
I
can
get
a
minute
approval
from
our
last
meeting
minutes
will
stand
without
objection.
Council
in
your
packet
this
afternoon
we
have
several
cases
to
go
over
that
had
opposition
at
Planning
Commission,
so
we
will
start
with
case
number,
2023-0116
and
good
afternoon,
Miss
rennick
good
afternoon.
How
are
you
General?
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
I
I,
don't
know
if
we
need
to
go
over
it
at
this
time
the
applicant
did
send
an
email
requesting
a
deferral
and
I'm
going
to
ask
for
a
well
a
one
month
or
to
our
next
regularly
planned
zoning
eating
a
committee.
So
I
don't
know
we
need
to
go
over
that
today.
We
can
go
over.
It
I
think
at
the
next
planning
and
zoning
committee
and
may
have
a
little
bit
more
information
to
to
go
with
it.
D
A
J
That's
correct:
that's
on
the
screen.
There
is
a
revised
request
and
I
told
the
applicant
that
I
would
bring
it
up
here.
The
applicant
originally
had
requested
C2
as
part
of
their
zoning
and
I
can
get
to
the
reviser
quest,
which
is
R3
so
where
the
little
kind
of
the
Red
Dot
is.
There's
a
C2,
a
church
property
plans
on
using
that
the
church
property
it's
no
longer
used
for
that
use
and
then
expanding
it
to
the
two
zones.
J
This
had
quite
a
bit
of
input
from
the
community
and,
along
with
that,
revised
request
as
a
series
of
conditions,
a
maximum
of
18
dwelling
units
on
the
property,
no
access
to
Centra
Street,
that's
the
property
to
the
north.
Excuse
me
that
street
to
the
north,
no
vehicular
access
through
the
remaining
R1
property
at
North,
Moss,
Avenue
and
existing
church
building
to
remain
so.
This
would
need
a
alternate
version
if
Council
wants
to
move
forward
with
this
on
the
agenda,
the
legal
description
for
the
R3
property
in
the
ordinance
is
correct.
A
Back
to
the
okay,
the
that
North
border
right
there,
where
you're
going
from
R1
to
R3,
would
that
require
a
landscape
buffer.
There.
J
I
believe
it
would
require
a
street
yard
and
not
a
landscape
buffer,
but
I
can
confirm
that
or
since
Dallas
is
here,
I
will
look
at
him
and
see
he's
got
a
thought.
Wait.
A
Okay,
we
talked
about
having
a
landscape
buffer.
There
Allen
said
he
thought
it
was
required,
but
I
guess
what
I
want
to
do
is
make
sure
that
there's
going
to
be
some
kind
of
buffer
landscape
buffer.
There.
A
Know
if
that's
through
you
know
condition
or
if
that's
a
requirement,
if
it's
a
requirement,
we
don't
need
a
condition.
Okay,.
J
D
Conditions
Council.
Will
you
allow
me
to
check
with
the
city
attorney
on
one
quick
thing?
Please
are
we
permitted
for
TCA
now
to
add
an
alternate
version
to
the
since
we
are
actually
voting
on
this
tonight?
Is
that
right
versus
next
we
usually
have
a
week
in
between
to
make
this
change,
but
are
we
we're
with
we're
within
the
window?
We
need
to
it.
A
H
You
quick
question:
I
noticed
in
in
the
conditions
that
there
were
two
roads:
no
access
to
Centro
Street
and
no
access
to
North
Moss.
How?
How
are
these
people
going
to
get
out
of
their
houses.
A
H
A
J
I
share
217
Tremont
Street,
and
this
is
the
a
rezoning
to
the
erm3
urban
Edge
multi-unit
residential
district.
That's
obviously
a
form-based
code.
District
proposal
is
for
multi-unit
residential
property
with
15
units.
Excuse
me,
let
me
go
to
my
notes.
J
The
this
is
currently
R3.
There
is
the
form-based
code
across
Tremont
Street,
starting
at
the
church,
which
is
kind
of
at
that
point
at
the
era
too
and
moving
south
and
that
form-based
code
Zone
was
part
of
the
original
rezoning
in
2016.
When
we
did
the
city-wide
form-based
code,
rezoning,
there's
a
couple
other
pieces
you'll
see
to
the
Northeast,
there's
an
erm3
and
an
era2.
Those
have
been
rezoned
since
that
original
form-based
kind
of
the
Citywide
form-based
code.
J
So
the
current
R3
Zone
will
allow
four
units
on
that
site
based
on
lot
size
and
yield
in
order
to
increase
density.
The
applicant
is
requesting
that
form-based
code,
the
ER
and
three
and
proposing
15
units,
which
is
47
dwelling
units,
an
acre
surrounding
land
uses,
include
single
unit,
residential
there's
vacant,
land,
commercial
and
then
a
church
across
the
street.
J
The
sites
located
in
the
North
Shore
plan
from
2007,
which
recommends
Urban,
medium-high
density
residential
for
the
future
land
use
and
that
promotes
Urban
densities
at
12
units
per
grader
and
then
there's
a
section
in
the
plan
that
specifically
notes
that
Urban
and
film
residential
form
is
intended
to
promote
existing
detached
residential
and
promote
Urban
info
residential
densities
of
12
units
or
greater.
So
that
plan
is
really
looking
at
increasing
density
staff
noted
that
the
the
Forex
code
Zone
allows
development
access
excess
of
five
units
which
aligns
with
planned
goals.
J
The
plan
also
has
some
language
about
sleep,
steep
slopes,
and
it
won't
go
into
all
the
points,
but
just
stressed
that
their
steep
slope
protection
is
important
to
this
community
and
staff.
Just
recommended
that
development
be
considerate
of
the
topography
on
the
site
and
ensure
in
order
to
ensure
compatibility
with
adjacent
development
form
and
protect.
Steep
slopes
in
the
area
sets
a
note
in
the
plan
and
carried
over
and
stressed
by
staff,
but
that
does
not
come
up
as
a
condition.
J
The
staff
found
that
the
request
is
compatible
with
adopted
plans
surrounding
land
uses
and
development
form.
The
site
is
in
close
proximity
to
the
form-based
code,
boundary
there's
some
review
to
make
sure
that's
appropriate
for
the
extension
of
form-based
code,
and
this
did.
This
was
appropriate
adjacent
form-based
zones
to
those
form-based
zones
to
the
south
and
north
of
the
site,
and
so
staff
recommended
approval.
There
was
quite
a
bit
of
opposition
present
and
concerns
about
parking
both
on
street
parking
and
then
parking
on
the
site.
J
Was
there
enough
adequate
parking
on
the
site
for
the
proposal,
concerns
about
pedestrian
safety,
Landscaping
walls,
retaining
walls
on
the
side
and
just
on
Street
management
of
the
property
in
general,
so
Planning
Commission
found
the
request
is
compatible
planning.
Commissioner,
spoke
to
the
fact.
They
thought
that
this
was
the
type
of
development
that
we
wanted
to
see
at
this
location
develop
and
it
was
compatible
with
development
form
and
adjacent
land
uses
and
Planning
Commission
recommended
approval.
D
H
Bus
chair
and
so
much
would
you
please
talk
us
through
what
is
allowed
to
be
built
in
erm3.
What
uses
are
allowed
in
the
rm3.
J
It
is
primarily
kind
of
residential
multi-unit
and
I
did
not
have
the
table
so
like
commercial,
so
you
primarily
you're
attachment
multi-unit
and
I
can
have
a
table
to
better
answer
that
tonight.
So.
J
H
You
so
it's
interesting
that
there
was
opposition
present
I,
have
gotten
zero
emails
about
this,
which
I
kind
of
expected
to
to
hear
from
it
and
I've
met
with
the
developers
well
in
advance
of
them.
Putting
in
this
application
will
you
talk
to
me
a
little
bit
more
about
the
opposition
and
the
question
of
on-site
management,
so.
J
That
one
we
have
is
flagged
I
think
that
they
were
my
memory
is
there
was
a
lot
of
and
I
put
some
pictures
in
in
case
there
was
opposition,
there's
it's
showing
how
the
parking
is
located
and
I
believe
the
applicant's
narrative
said
that
they
are
using
meeting
the
required
minimum
parking
standards
of
form-based
code
and
then
taking
advantage
of
the
ability
to
reduce
it
based
on
some
proximity
factors,
so
they
are
planning
on
meeting
the
code
requirements.
J
I
think
there
was
just
concern
about
people
parking
that
might
live
here
that
might
have
additional
cars
and
would
they
park
on
the
street.
Who
would
manage
how
that
would
happen
to
make
certain
they
weren't
parking
on
the
street
I
believe
it
was
in
relationship
to
parking
there's
quite
a
bit
of
concern
about
parking
on
the
street.
There
is
a
parking
deck
down
the
street
and
the
the
applicant
did
speak
to
that.
That
also
could
be
a
factor
and
additional
parking
if
someone
needed
it.
H
J
Correct
and
I
believe
their
narrative
spoke
to
the
fact
that
the
the
code
requires
essentially
around
one
unit
and
then
they're
able
to
draw
down
the
code
allows.
If
you
have
certain
items
in
closer
proximity,
you
can
reduce
that
number
and
that
they're
mentioned
that
they're.
Taking
advantage
of
those
to
be
able
to
draw
down
that
number.
J
H
And
to
be
clear,
people
are
allowed
legally
to
park
on
the
street
unless
there's
a
No
Parking
sign
correct.
Yes,.
D
J
D
D
J
A
note
of
this
case
had
opposition
and
emails,
but
it
is
one
of
three
cases:
there's
a
proposal
to
do
a
multi-united
apartment
complex,
so
it
requires
the
lifting
of
condition,
which
is
case
121
or
rezoning,
which
is
the
following
case,
which
actually
had
probably
more
of
the
opposition
and
then
an
abandonment
of
right
away.
That
was
recommended
for
approval
yesterday
at
Planning
Commission,
so
that
won't
appear
on
your
agenda.
J
But
I
wanted
you
to
know,
there's
several
cases
that
are
related
to
the
one
overall
development,
so
the
go
back
one.
This
is
on
Hixson
Pike.
It's
about
a
mile
east
of
Northgate
Mall
rezoning
is
to
lift
the
conditions
on
a
C2
Zone,
and
it's
part
of
this
over
all
larger
132
unit,
residential
apartment
development
and
just
kind
of
showing
that
overall
site
plan,
because
we'll
be
talking
about
a
small
part
of
a
0.67
acre
piece
kind
of
in
the
middle
on
the
Eastern
side
of
the
development.
J
So
it's
an
existing
C2
property.
This
is
the
site
of
a
former
Nursery
that
fronts
on
Hixson
Pike
and
when
it
was
rezoned
in
1989,
it
had
a
series
of
zoning
conditions
limiting
use
access
and
those
are
the
ones
the
applicant
would
like
to
lift.
So
again,
it's
it's
related
to
just
kind
of
this
one
part
in
the
center
of
the
overall
development.
J
The
side
is
in
the
Hixson
North
River
plan,
which
recommends
a
medium
business
mix,
which
really
is
kind
of
a
mix
of
kind
of
a
standard
commercial
mix
staff
felt
it
was
appropriate
to
lift
conditions
two
to
four
through
four,
which
are
the
access
easement
conditions,
but
is
recommending,
instead
of
just
lifting
all
use
conditions
on
the
property
recommended
that
drive
through
warehousing
and
wholesaling
auto-oriented
uses
hospitals,
adult
Orient
establishments
shall
be
prohibited,
so
not
fully
lifting
that
commercial
condition,
but
limiting
out
the
the
uses
that
generally
are
not
compatible
with
sometimes
with
neighboring
properties.
J
So
there
probably
was
no
opposition
present
to
this
Planning
Commission
kind
of
hurt
them
all
at
the
same
time,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
up,
and
it
comes
with
a
Planning
Commission
recommendation
similar
to
the
staff
recommendation,
which
is
a
men
condition
number
one
in
lift
conditions.
Two
three
and
four
and
I
can
move
on
to
the
next
one,
which
is
the
companion
case.
This
is
the
rezoning
case
for
the
property
and
the
request
is
rezoned
from
R2
to
R3
for
17
Acres.
So
this
is
kind
of
the
bulk
of
the
property.
J
J
The
rest
of
the
development,
the
site,
surrounded
by
single
unit
residential
commercial
and
office,
uses
staff
found
that
the
request
is
not
compatible
with
the
Hixson
North
River
plan
surrounding
development
or
development
form
staff
out
the
existing
R2
Zone
meets
the
plan,
goals
for
low
density
and
medium
density,
residential
and
the
R2
Zone
would
allow
44
single
unit
Lots
34,
duplex,
Lots
or
68
two-unit
townhome
Lots,
which
align
with
the
plan
goals.
There's
this
and
felt
the
existing
zoning
is
more
compatible.
J
Steph
did
highlight
the
just
a
couple
components
of
the
plan
that
did
were
supported
so
the
overall
site
plan
and
the
proposal
there
were
several
items
that
did
conform
to
the
plan.
One
of
those
is
community
space
along
North,
chick
Creek.
That
is
something
the
site
plan
shows
and
staff
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
that
is
supported
in
the
plan
and
there's
no
proposed
access
to
Old,
Hicks
and
Pike
in
the
in
the
development,
and
that's
something
that
continues
a
zoning
condition
pattern
that
council's
put
on
cases
over
time.
J
So
the
applicant
came
to
Planning
Commission
with
some
proposed.
Excuse
me
with
some
proposed
conditions
and
then
Planning
Commission
added
on
one
or
two,
and
it
comes
with
a
recommendation
to
approve
rezoning
with
the
following
conditions:
they're
six
noted
there.
The
applicant
told
me
I'm
just
prior
to
this
meeting,
that
he
would
he's
going
to
request
to
lift
the
maximum
density
of
132
units
in
the
driveway
location
to
be
off
of
Old
Hixson
Pike.
K
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair
Karen.
Thank
you,
I,
honestly,
I
think
this.
This
recap
really
answered
most
of
my
questions.
My
big
concern
that
that
I
had
spoken
to
the
applicant
was
well
a
couple
of
them,
one
being
accessed
from
old,
Hicks
and
Pike,
which
we
can
apparently
we're
in
an
agreement
of
removing
that,
and
the
other
part,
of
course,
was
no
development
north
of
old
Hixson
Pike.
So
the
area
that
immediately
abuts
the
creek
will
be
left
either
as
is
or
made
more
usable
as
Green
Space
correct,
so
no
development
in
that
area.
K
You
I
think
you
also
said
where
the
applicant
may
want
to
lift
the
maximum
density
of
132
units.
That's.
J
K
Okay,
I
can
deal
with
that
one
this
evening,
but
I'm
not
amenable
to
that
request
at
this
time.
No
further
questions
I'm
good,
okay!
Thank
you.
I'm.
D
J
Flagged
this
just
because
it
had
originally
had
opposition
I,
believe
we've
presented
on
it
at
the
July
planning
and
zoning
committee
and
I
believe
there's
some
additional
discussion
being
held
with
the
community.
So
I
won't
present
on
it
unless
specifically
specifically
needed.
B
Have
four?
Yes,
so
the
community
is
still
working
with
the
developers
to
work
out
some
traffic
plans.
So
I
would
like
a
deferral
for
this
one
until
October,
the
10th
October.
B
D
J
And
137
and
138
are
for
the
same
at
the
same
location,
the
Lucy
quarter
site.
This
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
unusual
and
let
me
get
to
it.
Staff
is
staff
is
requesting
a
deferral.
There
are
three
related
cases.
One
is
an
abandonment
of
a
right-of-way
and
then
the
two
cases
before
you
on
the
agenda
today
are
lifting
conditions
from
mandatory
referral
abandonment.
J
So
there's
a
package
of
three
here:
The
Furs
and
staff
had
recommended
denial
of
the
abandonment
to
had
recommended
two
Planning
Commission
denial
of
the
abandonment
and
then
was
recommending
deferral
of
137
or
138
to
see
what
happens
with
that
abandonment
request,
because
they're
connected
137
138,
the
applicant
is
requesting
lifting
the
condition
requiring
dedication
of
right-of-way.
So
we
were
kind
of
seeing
what
council,
what
CDOT
recommends
to
council
and
what
council,
how
Council
acts
on
that
right-of-way
prior
to
lifting
conditions?
J
I,
don't
know
if
we
weren't
able
perhaps
to
to
convey
that
timing
to
Planning
Commission,
they
did
move
them
forward.
So
we
spoke
internally
as
planning
staff
reached
out
to
Ben
Taylor
had
another
discussion.
We
are
requesting
deferring
again
lifting
conditions
that
abandonment
is
under
review
by
CDOT
right
now
and
will
be
put
on
council's
agenda
in
a
few
weeks
weeks.
So
we
are
asking.
We
don't
have
quite
the
good
guidance
that
we
need
to
give
you
until
we're
able
to
get
that
thorough
review
of
CDOT
for
that
right-of-way.
So
we
are
requesting.
J
We
established
how
long
pardon,
how
long
I
will
defer
the
pen
three
weeks.
J
Of
that
one,
yes,
138
is
the
same.
Just
we
had
this
little
kind
of
set
of
related
ones
and
what
38
is
the
same?
We
need
the
same
information
so.
J
J
Correct-
and
this
was
and
then
Mr
chair,
if
I
can
reserve
the
right
to
swing
back
to
the
special
permit,
for
the
liquor
store
I'd
just
to
flag
that
to
for
some
clarity
but
I
will
that
is
totally
fine?
Okay,
let
me
I'll
move
on
to
the
foreign.
J
Case
117
is
East
Brainerd
on
Gray
Road
at
1619,
Gray
Road,
and
this
is
under
the
resolutions
because
it's
a
special
permit
for
a
residential
plan
unit
development.
The
applicant
originally
was
proposing
31
single-family
detached
law,
detached
lots,
and
that
has
changed
after
going
through
discussions
with
the
community
and
Planning
Commission.
There
was
opposition
at
Planning
Commission
says
while
we're
covering
it,
the
property
is
zoned
R1,
as
as
much
of
the
property
on
Gray
Road,
that
yellow
is
the
R1
Zone
you're.
J
Picking
up
some
pieces
off
Jenkins
of
a
townhouse
development
Jenkins
has
a
little
bit
of
a
different
feel
and
has
introduced
them
attached.
Housing
excuse
me
has
introduced
some
more
close
higher
density
housing,
but
we
don't
have
that
on
great
road.
Yet
there's
no
recent
zoning
history
in
the
site
and
just
based
on
our
Cal
calculations
that
are
one
zone
by
right
could
yield
a
gross
lot
yield
of
38
dwelling
units
that
might
be
a
little
bit
High.
J
There's
a
flood
plain
in
the
area
a
105
year,
100
and
500
year,
flood
plain-
and
that
does
come
up
in
some
of
the
discussion,
so
I
wanted
to
show
it
it's
near
the
back
of
the
lot.
There's
a
little
area,
that's
outside
the
flood
plain
and
you'll
start
to
see
how
the
site
plan
addresses
that
floodplain
area
the
site's
located
in
the
area,
11
East,
Brainerd
plan
it
identifies
the
site
of
suburban
residential,
which
includes
single-family
D
church
is
the
primary
use
again.
J
The
property
zone
of
R1,
the
Pud
is
for
single
family
detached
use.
Density
in
the
Suburban
residential
Place
type
can
range
from
three
to
ten
units
per
acre,
because
this
is
zoned
R1.
This
underlying
zoning
will
will
control
the
density.
The
air
11
plan
notes
that
area
residents
expressed
a
high
level
of
concern
about
flooding
and
a
plan
provides
some
specific
recommendations
that
can
possibly
be
considered.
J
I
just
noted
that
generally
talks
about
preserving
land
for
natural
storm,
water
management
and
wildlife,
habitat
and
clustering
homes
on
smaller
lots
to
minimize
overall
impacts
staff
found
the
proposed
single
unit
detached
development
is
compatible
with
a
plan
and
recommended
a
condition
to
limit
development
in
the
flood
plan
to
ensure
compatibility
with
planned
goals.
So
staff
recommendation
was
to
prove
the
plan
unit
development
with
no
residential
lots
allowed
west
of
the
Hundred
Year
floodplain
and
that
being
kind
of
West
closer
to
that
neighborhood.
J
There
was
quite
a
bit
of
opposition
present
at
Planning
Commission
concerns
about
water,
runoff
and
and
storm
water.
Their
Gray
Road
is
used
for
cut
through
just
general
traffic
in
the
area,
concerns
about
overcrowding,
the
condition
of
the
roads
and
then
flooding
Planning
Commission
found.
The
request
is
compatible
with
a
plan
in
adjacent
land
uses.
The
applicant
came
with
some
conditions
and
with
conditions
Planning
Commission
felt
the
HUD
was
appropriate.
So
there's
a
list
of
conditions
there
and
I
can
read
those
out.
I.
J
Think
kind
of
some
of
the
highlights
were
would
be
that
there's
no
accessory
dwelling
units,
that's
I,
think
in
response
to
keeping
the
density
down
for
the
Neighbors
evergreen
tree
spacing
and
then
a
minimum
building
lot
width
of
55
feet.
That
was
something
that
was
in
response
to
some
of
the
neighbors
concerns.
So
this
does
come
with
a
recommendation
to
approve
the
with
conditions.
D
They
did
have
a
meeting
they
being
the
applicant
and
the
representative
from
the
neighborhood,
who
is
the
adjacent
property
owner
and
homeowner
and
I
appreciate
them.
Having
that
meeting
they
did
meet,
but
they
were
unable
to
I
guess
come
to
a
full
agreement.
Therefore,
we
are
here-
and
it
will
be
up
to
this
body
to
make
that
decision
this
evening
and
I
wanted
to
make
note
of
that
Karen.
Those
additional
conditions
were
to
replace
the
no
development
west
of
the
flood
plain.
D
The
other
condition
was
a
aluminum
fence
and
trees
both
to
be
built
on
the
property
of
the
developer,
along
the
entire
Northern
and
the
entire
Southern
boundaries.
Those
were
the
conditions
that
the
adjacent
property
owner
is
asking
for
and
so
be
on
the
lookout
for
that.
Obviously,
we
don't
do
an
alternate
version
per
TCA
recent
rules,
so
you
could
see
that
coming
form
in
the
form
of
emotion
from
the
floor.
D
Thank
you.
The
interesting
part
about
this
case
is
under
R1
and
with
our
recent
Adu
and
I
think
I
heard
some
gaffs
back
here
from
the
council
seeing
that
as
a
condition,
if
you
were
to
take
and
I
think
the
numbers
once
you
take
out
the
flood
plain
you
look
at
25
I
think
is
a
number
that
is
by
right.
D
D
residential
units
if,
if
it
were,
and
but
the
the
Crux
of
the
argument
was
that
gray
road
is
not
in
condition
for
this,
and
I
would
agree
that
it
is
a
narrow
road
like
many
of
our
roads
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
and
it
is
too
fast
and
therefore
out
of
that
meeting.
I
immediately
started
because
I
heard
conversations
from
the
residents
that
Gray
Road
was
too
fast.
D
So
thanks
to
Ben
Taylor,
who
has
taken
that
under
task
right
now
we're
going
to
lower
that
speed,
limit
right,
Ben
all
right
to
25,
which
is
a
residential
and
then
I
think
the
next
step
is.
They
had
tried
once
before,
to
petition
for
speed,
humps
and
speed
reduction
and
I,
think
that
is
by
petition
Ben
if
I'm,
correct
okay,
so
that
process
will
involve
the
neighbors
once
again,
so
I
want
them
to
pay
attention
that,
but
those
if
I
covered
kind
of
the
the
nuts
and
bolts
here.
D
And
you
remove
the
Adu,
so
you
remove
that
entire
component.
Now
it
is
important
to
also
notice
in
the
proposed
housing
action
plan
proposed
to
us
last
week
a
week
before
the
adus
will
be
heavily
promoted
in
the
city
as
as
a
way
to
increase
density
and
I.
That's
a
note
that
I
wanted
to
make
sure
everybody
understood.
D
H
You
yeah
I
will
say
the
Adu
condition
did
strike
me
as
a
limitation
to
property
rights
of
the
people
who
would
purchase
homes
in
this
area.
How
how
large
are
they
anticipating
these
houses
being,
do
you
know.
D
For
wonder,
I
remember:
these
are
single
family
homes.
I
will
tell
you
what
I
heard
in
the
meeting
and
in
conversation
these
are
single
family
homes,
ranging
from
600
000
to
a
million
dollar
homes.
D
So
I
would
imagine
these
are
20
a
I'm
going
from
the
meeting
yeah
25
to
3500
square
foot
homes,
so.
H
J
H
J
I
touch
briefly
on
the
liquor
store.
Just
because
there's
a
note,
do
you
have
to
the
city
attorney's
nodding,
so
I
feel
like
that.
J
We
had
had
a
staff
note
in
your
packet
regarding
the
liquor
store
that
the
gis
records
show,
that
was
about
a
514
feet
from
the
nearest
boundary
of
a
church
and
that
we
needed
to
get
a
survey.
We
did
get
a
survey
from
the
applicant
end
of
last
week
first
of
this
week,
and
it
shows
the
property
is
about
515
feet,
so
that
is
added
to
the
site.
C
J
D
L
I'm,
thank
you
chair,
so
I
mean
are,
you
are
you
are
finished
with
all
the
notable
oppositions
am
I
correctness.
There's
any
case
you'd
like
to
go
over.
Please.
Let
me
know,
I
do
I
have
three
here.
Two
of
them
I
have
not
heard
from
the
developers
at
all.
Could
you
give
me
a
case
number
if.
L
L
D
D
L
Okay,
okay,
so
and
then
on
2023
0126
I
will
be
asking
for
a
deferment
on
that
due
to
language
barriers.
So
so
were
you
required
to
how
long
a
week
a
week
one
week?
Yes,
it
would
be
September
the
19th
all
right.
It's
gonna
be
a
deferral
evening:
okay,
okay,.
D
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
you're,
welcome.
Thank
you,
councilwoman,
no,
any
other
questions
or
comments
for
Karen
Karen.
Thank
you
very
much.
Yeah.
We
have
no
other
business
before
this
Council.
We
do
need.