►
From YouTube: Chattanooga City Council Agenda 03/07/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Soon
we
have
several
cases,
but
really
only
a
couple
with
opposition.
We
have
a
withdrawal
request
on
I
believe
maybe
two,
and
there
is
a
presentation
that
has
been
requested
for
case0019,
so
Council.
What
I
would
like
to
do
is
ask.
Are
there
any
cases
that
you
would
like
Karen
to
go
over
in
a
presentation?
If
you
would
like
to
see
one
councilman,
Henderson
I
see
your
light,
sir.
A
A
Okay,
so
the
cases
that
we
have
in
question,
Karen
I,
believe
the
store
6B
I
almost
do
the
same
thing
case.
26
cannot
believe
we
need
a
question
and
answer
q.
A
on
that
our
presentation
is
requested,
I
believe
on
case
one
nine,
okay
and
I.
Do
would
like
for
us
to
probably
go
into
item
seven
under
the
E.
The
resolution
to
give
you
time
at
the
end
and
outside
of
those
we
just
mentioned
I,
don't
have
any
lights
for
full
presentations
on
any
other
cases.
I
know
you're
disappointed,
but
okay,
that's
okay.
A
B
Thank
you,
sir
Karen
and
I've
read
through
this
and
I
know
they're
wanting
to
put
like
two
Town
Homes
here.
C
I
think
they're
wanting
to
their
site
plan
shows
one
quad
Plex,
which
is
four
connected
units.
Okay,
so.
B
So
let
me
ask
you
so
my
question
is
this
and
we
have
no
problem
with
that.
Is
that
all
they
can
put?
There
is
four
units.
C
So,
based
on
the
lot
size,
I
believe
so,
but
I
will
double
check
that
we
didn't
recommend
any
other
conditions.
So
I
didn't
have
the
list
of
all
the
other
possibilities.
But
I
will
look
at
that
and.
C
C
Look
at
all
the
configurations
and
I'll
send
an
email.
Thank
you,
okay
and
then
I
will
go
back
Cameron
if
I
can
just
touch
briefly
on
number
11.
There
is
a
request
to
withdraw.
This
was
a
rezoning
or
is
it
a
zoning
case
on
Central
Avenue
and
the
applicant
send
an
email
requesting
withdrawal?
That's.
C
Case
number
19.:
this
comes
with
a
Planning
Commission
and
staff
recommendation
to
deny
this
is
at
1414
East
49th
Street,
the
the
Rossville
Boulevard
area.
Let
me
get
back
to
my
notes.
C
Okay
and
the
applicant
would
like
to
construct
a
duplex.
The
property
is
shown
in
yellow
the
all
the
light
yellow
is
the
R1
single
family
Zone.
There
is
an
R2
Zone
next
door,
Council
approved
the
R2
rezoning
in
2022
and
that
was
to
bring
in
existing
duplex
into
compliance
surrounding
land
uses,
consist
of
single-family
residences
and
that
existing
duplex
abetting
the
site
to
the
West.
C
This
is
just
a
picture
of
the
site
to
kind
of
give
you
an
idea.
The
staff
report
notes.
The
lot
does
not
meet
the
minimum.
7
500
square
foot
lot
size
needed
for
a
duplex
and
a
lot
of
record.
A
special
permit
from
the
board
of
zoning
appeals
would
be
required
prior
to
the
release
of
building
permits
for
a
duplex
on
the
side
of
the
rezoning
is
approved.
C
With
some
exceptions,
a
site
is
located
in
Boulevard
Park,
where
the
plan
notes,
a
retention
of
single
family
residences
is
a
priority
between
East
47th
and
East
50th
streets,
but
acknowledges
there
could
be
some
potential
for
Planned
unit
developments
in
the
area.
The
neighboring
duplex
was
rezoned
in
2022
was
an
existing
non-conforming
use.
The
staff
report
noted
that
attached
or
detached
accessory
dwelling
unit
could
be
structured
constructed
on
the
site,
along
with
a
single
family
dwelling,
to
enable
those
two
units
on
one
lot.
There
was
opposition
president
Planning
Commission.
C
One
gentleman
stated
that
he
had
sought
rezoning
I
believe
on
this
side
or
in
the
area
and
that
he
had
been
recommended
or
had
been
denied.
It
was
just
reminding
Planning
Commission
of
that
and
a
neighboring
resident
spoke
of
her
concerns
about
parking
for
the
duplex
parking
location
and
how
currently,
with
the
parking
configuration
on
the
street,
sometimes
it's
difficult
to
access
her
garbage
canner
for
the
city
to
access
her
garbage
can
so
just
some
concern
about
the
amount
of
parking
related
to
that
use.
C
She
did
not
say
she
had
concerns
about
development
in
the
area
which
is
particularly
about
that
site
and
and
the
ability
to
access
the
garbage
and
with
the
cars
in
the
area.
The
planning
division
commission
found
that
the
request
is
not
compatible
with
the
Rossville
Boulevard
plan,
adjacent
land
uses
and
comes
with
a
recommendation
to
deny
any
questions.
No,
thank
you.
So
much
I.
A
Have
a
real,
quick
question
on
that,
if
I
may
I
know
I'm
stepping
over
into
mosa
territory,
hardships
are
usually
the
determining
factor
for
a
variance
of
this
report.
Is
there
any
hardship
that
you
has
been
noted
by
the
applicant.
C
So
this
I
think-
and
this
is
digging
deep
in
my
memory,
but
this
is
for
a
special
permit
for
two
family
dwelling
on
a
lot
of
record
that
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
enough
lot
size,
so
this
would
not
be
for
variance
I,
think
it's
specific
to
that
special
permit,
which
we've
had
enough
of
these
over
the
years
that
was
created
for
that.
So
it
is
a
tool
that
enables
that,
but
it
would
be
that
reduction
in
lot
size
would
be
needed.
Okay,
thank
you.
B
C
That
would
be
could
be
at
the
board
of
zoning
appeals
and
that.
C
Law,
caption
of
things
that
can
be
allowed
by
the
board
of
signing
appeals,
I
think
staff
was
pointing
towards
the
the
special
permit,
but
that
would
also
right
body.
A
C
C
One
next,
thank
you,
okay,
so
there
are
two
cases
on
the
set
14th,
the
Jennifer,
the
14th
for
the
Goodwin
Road
Site.
This
had
action
not
somewhat
recently.
There
is
a
zoning
case
to
rezone
a
small
portion
of
the
site,
and
this
is
for
the
planned
unit
development
that
was
approved
in
2022.
So
this
is
a
request
just
to
orient
you
this
a
request
to
amend
the
Pud.
From
that
case,
this
request
includes
an
addition
of
about
six
and
a
half
acres.
C
It's
intended
to
revise
the
internal
layout
of
Roads,
the
addition
of
town
homes
and
the
addition
of
an
R4
zoned
area
to
the
Pud
and
an
increase
in
density.
So
the
original
pet
plan
was
presented,
improved
so
moved
forward
with
the
project
or
this
applicants
move
forward
with
the
project.
There's
a
request
for
some
changes.
C
So
the
case
2022
147,
that
request
the
prior
request
for
the
Pud
was
subject
to
condition
by
city
council
stating
roads,
A
and
B
on
the
master
plan
shall
be
planted
as
public
roads,
so
staff
recommending
before
there's
some
PUD
changes,
you'll
see
the
proposed
PUD,
the
the
existing
pad
and
the
proposed
pad
staff
found
the
proposals
compatible
with
the
area
11
plan
adjacent
land
use
is
in
development
form
the
plant.
C
So
the
Pud
is
recommended
to
have
a
condition
for
all
internal
streets
shall
be
public
and
I
know
that
the
applicant
has
been
communicating
with
CDOT
and
some
of
the
other
permitting
departments.
Just
to
make
sure
that
how
that
looks,
and
if
there
are
any
concerns
and.
A
I've
been
tracking
this
one
as
well
with
about
the
street
I
know
the
Chattanooga
fire
department
has
said
that
they
were
okay
with
the
way
the
streets
and
I
believe
that
we
are,
and
that's
why
I
had
emailed
Ben
and
Ben
I
apologize.
It's
been
a
little
busy
today
to
read
your
email,
but
I
believe
you
and
the
applicant
have
also
been
in
contact
on
that
particular
issue
and
I
think
there's
some
some
things
that
might
still
be
able
to
work
out
so
I
see
the
two
of
you
in
the
room.
A
I'm
hoping
maybe
that'll
happen
here
when
we
leave
here
out
of
this
committee.
But
do
you
see
any
problems
with
accepting
these
roads,
or
is
there
still
conversation?
You
can
just
nod
your
head
that
you
need
to
address
and
I'd
appreciate
you
being
here,
because
I
think
this
is
this
is
important
for
us
to
before
it
gets
on
the
moves
on
to
the
agenda.
To
answer
this
question
sure.
D
Yeah
yep
Mike's
here
so
I'll
show
Mike
the
applicant
in
a
moment.
But
yes,
the
foreign
I
think
there's
a
room
to
work
out
a
plan.
Some
of
the
dead
end
streets
aren't
ideal
for
some
city
services
without
turnaround
points
but
yeah.
So
we
are
want
to
talk
to
them
a
little
bit
about
how
they
plan
on
utilizing
that
area
and
hopefully
figure
something
out
on
that
between
now
and
the
next
meeting.
Okay.
A
C
Right,
the
I'll
touch
briefly
on
the
plan
of
services
for
5619
Clark
Road.
This
is
under
the
legal
section
on
your
agenda,
for
the
plan
of
services
did
get
a
Planning
Commission,
so
I'll
just
kind
of
show
you
the
maps
and
Orient
you
before
property
can
be
annexed.
The
city
must
adopt
the
plan
of
services.
The
plan
of
services
is
to
be
studied
by
the
Planning
Commission
in
a
written
report
produced
so
planning.
C
Commissioner
view
the
staff
report
on
the
plan
of
services
at
their
February
meeting
and
the
written
report
is
included
in
your
packet
as
part
of
the
item,
along
with
some,
the
applicant's
request
for
the
rezoning.
So
the
property
owner
requested
the
annexation,
the
property
owners,
TP,
Chattanooga
property
LLC.
You
should
see
their
materials
as
in
the
packet
5619
Clark
Road
adjoins
the
city
of
Chattanooga
limits
in
the
Harrison
area.
This
is
about
500
feet,
north
of
the
intersection
of
Clark
Road
and
Highway
58..
So
this
is
across
the
street
from
Ferdinand
peace
and
enterprise
South.
C
The
next
map
is
a
zoning
map,
and
this
is
just
to
kind
of
set
up
the
applicant's
reason
for
requesting
annexation.
You'll
see
R3
zoning
that
brown
zoning
includes
this
piece
and
the
piece
to
the
South
and
Southwest
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
multi-family
apartment,
complex
on
that
site
and
the
area
that
is
highlighted
with
the
hatch
Mark
is
about
1.3
Acres.
It's
part
of
a
proposed
larger
multi-family
apartment
complex.
A
And
as
a
reminder,
we
will
have
a
public
hearing
at
a
special
presentation
at
next
week's
meeting
on
the
annexation,
any
questions
or
comments
regarding
the
annexation
item
for
next
week,
any
questions
or
comments
for
Planning
and
Zoning.
We
need
to
address
before
we
adjourn
until
six
o'clock,
seeing
none.
We
are
Journal
six.