►
From YouTube: Chattanooga City Council Agenda Meeting 6/6/23
Description
Chattanooga City Council Agenda Meeting 6/6/23
A
That
Council,
we
hope
you
had
a
restful
last
Tuesday
can
I
get
approval,
minutes
all
right,
I'm,
Gonna
Stand,
without
objection
all
right
Council.
If
you
look
over
your
agenda
session,
we
have
no
ordinances
on
Final
reading.
We
have
three
ordinances
on
first
reading.
If
you
have
any
questions
or
comments,
please
hit
your
like.
A
A
A
B
B
Five
years,
so
the
capital
projects
are
the
biggest
things
that
happened
in
the
in
the
districts
and
every
year
effectively
approved
is
a
five-year,
Capital
Improvement
plan,
and
then
we
are
to
get.
We
asked
for
quarterly
reports
on
the
plan
we
approve.
We
did
get
a
report
from
Vicki
when
I
called
her
attention
to
the
fact.
We
just
got
it
the
last,
maybe
for
the
last
quarter.
B
What
we
didn't
do,
because
it
was
the
last
page
of
the
notebook
and
it
wasn't
delineated
as
we
didn't,
approve
the
five-year
Capital
plan
that
would
engender
the
reports
that
we
get
quarterly.
It
was
an
oversight
on
all
our
part.
I
think
we
would
just
we
were
budgeted
out
and
all
I
want
to
know
is.
Does
the
council
wish
to
review
that
before
the
first
vote
on
the
budget,
because
it's
next
week
it's
easily
cured
I
just
want
to
know
what
the
council
wants
to
do.
C
D
E
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
I
was
waiting
for
Jermaine
to
pop
in
and
I
saw
that
he
just
joined
us.
So
as
going
back
to
item
F
on
the
Tiff
policies
and
procedures,
I
have
just
a
couple
of
clarifications.
If
I
can
sure
it's
remain
The
Madam
chair,
if
you'll
permit
me
some
of
the
recommendations,
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
we
have
covered
these
bases,
so
this
could
be
a
hopefully
yes,
no
okay.
We
are
adding
stronger
language
to
protect
our
school
taxes
from
abatement
at
any
at
any
turn.
Yes
right!
E
That's
that's
good!
We
are
acknowledging
the
community
impact
of
the
development,
which
means
to
me
we
are
diving
deeper
into
the
actual
benefit
of
the
area
for
our
citizens.
Yes,
that
seems
to
be
I
think
a
good,
a
good
step
forward.
The
third
party
review
at
the
expense
of
the
applicant
I
think
is
actually
absolutely
critical
and
the
credentials
being
required
by
that
third
part
party
I
think
we're
using.
Maybe
a
firm
out
of
Knoxville
is
really
good.
E
G
So
with
each
Tiff,
you
all,
as
the
council
gets
to
select
two
people
to
serve
on
the
application.
Review
Committee.
The
idb
now
would
also
like
to
have
two
people
to
serve
on
the
committee.
In
addition
to
the
mayor,
who
gets
two
people
to
serve
on
the
committee
and
then,
of
course,
there's
one
representative
from
the
chamber.
So
it
brings
it
from
a
minimum
five
person
committee
to
a
minimum
seven-person
committee
very.
E
Coming
that
strengthens
to
wrap
it
up
with
a
nice
little
bow.
That
also
will
come
into
play
when
we
ask
my
famous
question,
which
is
always,
but
for
yes
and
I,
think
that
will
help
us
quantify
that
question
easily,
so
we
don't
necessarily.
We
should
always
ask
it
I
think
it's
good
good
policy
that
we
always
ask
it
yes,
but
I
feel
like
that.
We're
covering
those
bases,
more
upfront
am
I.
We
are
safe
from
saying
that
yeah.
G
E
A
A
E
Madam
chair
can
I
get
a
little
bit
more
info.
I,
don't
need
it
in
the
microphone,
but
before
six
o'clock
on
The
Biohazard
cleanup
on
Veterans
Bridge,
we've
had
similar
incidences
in
East
Brainerd
as
well
and
I'm
trying
to
see
if
this
is
something
that
we
need
to
keep
an
eye
out
for,
but
it
just
before
six,
that's
fine
I'll
need
a
presentation
on
it.
Good.
F
A
Any
other
questions
any
other
questions
on
future
considerations
or
purchases,
all
right
all
right,
departmental
reports.
Today
we
will
have
a
report
from
the
air
pollution
control
board.
I.
Thank
you
for
your
patience
with
us
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
So,
if
you
want
to
come
up
and
give
you
an
update.
H
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
Madam,
chair
and
council
members.
My
name
is
Ron
Drew
Miller
I'm,
the
executive
director
for
the
air
filter,
Chattanooga
Hamilton,
County,
Air,
Pollution
Control
Bureau
today,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
air
pollution
control
board,
asking
the
council
to
adopt
proposed
revisions
to
the
air
pollution
control
regulations
which
ultimately
will
be
adopted
by
legislative
bodies
throughout
the
Hamilton
County,
and
just
note
that
these
revisions
already
been
approved
by
the
Hamilton
County
Board
of
Commissioners.
H
The
air
pollution
control
board
has
the
responsibility
of
recommending
changes
in
the
air
pollution
control
regulations
to
the
various
legislative
bodies
in
the
county.
These
proposed
changes
to
the
air
pollution
control
regulations
were
the
subject
of
at
least
30
days,
public
comment
and
a
public
hearing
before
the
air
police
patrol
board.
H
H
They
are
commonly
adopted
by
reference
by
state
and
local
jurisdictions
to
ensure
National
uniformity
of
rules
and
streamlining
of
state
and
local
regulations,
since
many
of
them
are
extremely
extremely
lengthy.
The
state
recently
updated
the
rules
for
new
sources
and
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollution
and
is
requiring
that
our
local
rules
be
updated
in
order
to
be
no
less
stringent
than
the
state
rules.
H
Updating
the
list
of
chemicals
for
which
they
are
a
national
ambient
air
quality
standards,
cutting
electric
notice,
e-notice,
Provisions,
updating,
stack
testing
requirements,
asbestos
regulations
and
fees,
open
burning
rules,
landfill
rules,
confidentiality,
Provisions,
making
minor
administrative
changes
and
Corrections,
and
basically
grammatical
areas,
errors
and,
to
the
end,
the
air
pollution
control
board
unanimously
recommends.
All
of
these
revisions
has
asked
that
the
county
and
all
of
its
municipalities
enact
them
in
order
to
maintain
local
jurisdiction
over
Air
Pollution
Control.
H
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
general
question
for
you
yeah,
so
the
air
pollution
control
Barrel
has
an
enforcement
component
to
it
other
than
not
just
reporting
but
tracking,
but
enforcement
as
well.
Can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
enforcement
side
of
what
you
do
and
if
someone
were
to
see
something
that
that
bothered
them
or
seemed
out
of
sort?
What
would
they
do.
H
So
a
citizen
can
easily
call
us
and
say:
hey
our
neighbor
or
so-and-so
was
burning
and
something
doesn't
look
right,
so
our
investigator
would
go
out
and
investigate
if
a
nervous
violation
is
issued,
then
they
will
come
see
me
for
an
enforcement
hearing.
I
hear
both
sides
of
the
story
from
my
investigator
and
for
the
Violator
at
the
end
of
that
then
I
enforced
a
civil
penalty
which
60
40
split,
goes
to
the
city
and
county.
We
don't
get
the
Civil
penalty
money
and
the
enforcement
cost.
H
H
H
Yeah
so
the
we
have
a
text
program
that
goes
out
for
any
type
of
awareness.
We
have
the
daily
aqi
report
that
goes
out
which
the
news
channels
are
aware
of
and
we're
in
line
with
the
division.
Forestry.
As
far
as
burning
and
or
not
burning
every
time
I
have
an
enforcement
hearing
is
actually
a
learning
experience.
So
I
don't
try
to
break
the
bank
to
to
get
the
point
across,
but
just
a
little
bit
of
Sting.
H
E
E
H
E
Last
question
Madam
chair
and
this:
do
you
follow
up
with
the
person
that
may
have
filed
a
concern
to
let
them
know
what
you
found,
or
does
it
just
kind
of
a
lot
of
times?
We
find
that
when
we
try
to
be
to
be
involved
in
something
like
this,
we
never
find
out
what
actually
ever
happened
and
I
feel
like
we're.
I'll
give
you
a
scenario.
What
happens
recently,
that
link
is
not
always
solid.
There.
H
A
neighbor
called
our
investigator
and
said
this
person
is
running
their
diesel
truck
for
an
hour
next
to
me,
and
so
my
investigator
went
over
there
and
talk
to
the
Violator,
fix
the
situation
and
then
got
back
and
got
back
with
the
the
neighbor
that
complained
and
the
neighbor
actually
called
me
to.
Thank
me
how
good
of
a
job
our
investigator
did,
because
that
would
happen
multiple
times.
So
yes,
there's
times
when
we
go
reach
back
out
to
the
person
that
kind
of
reached
out
to
us.
E
Okay,
yeah
I'll
I'll
follow
up
with
some
more
questions,
but
I
really
think
that
this
is
great
I
appreciate
you
coming
today
and
I
apologize
too
for
you
having
to
come
back,
but
I
think
this
is
real
important
as
far
as
creating
a
better
place
for
all
of
us
to
live
that
we
learn
more
about
what
you
all
do.
Absolutely
I
really
do
so.
I
appreciate.
A
E
A
Chair,
thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
Councilman
I
learned
a
lot
of
Nick
and
that
that
question
into
that
was
good
information.
Any
of
the
questions
from
Council
all
right.
Thank
you
all
right
with
that.
That
is
our
agenda
session
committee.
Today
we
have
planning
and
zoning
and
we
do
not
have
an
attorney-client
privilege
meeting
today.
E
Good
afternoon,
everyone
this
is
familiar,
welcome
to
planet
and
Zoning
for
June
6
I
will
take
a
motion
on
the
minutes.
Please
minutes
have
been
motioned
at
second
hit
and
they
will
stand
without
objection.
So
today
we
have
several
cases
I
think
most
of
them
are
in
District,
Six,
Dr,
verse
very
busy
place
this
month
and
also
District,
eight
and
I
believe
we
have
one
in
District,
9.
E
E
B
B
E
E
B
D
Want
to
read
those
conditions
for
me.
Yes,
sir,
the
conditions
are
use
is
a
wholesale
lumber
yard
and
related
merchandise,
sale,
only
accesses
to
be
through
Evelyn,
Drive
or
Ocoee
Street.
Only
exterior,
spotlighting
or
other
illumination
of
non-residential
uses
or
structures
shall
be
directed
down
and
away
from
residential
zones
or
uses
per
section.
E
D
E
E
B
B
F
J
Okay,
the
first
case
is
2022
262..
It's
a
request
to
rezone
7707
Lee
Highway
from
C2
convenience,
commercial
Zone
to
ugc,
Urban,
General
commercial
Zone
to
develop
94
housing
units
in
an
existing
Hotel
building.
So
this
case
in
the
next
case
on
the
agenda,
which
is
case
263,
2022
263
our
next
to
each
other
on
Lee
Highway
and
most
discussion
on
this
case
carries
over
to
the
other,
except
for
a
few
minor
details.
So
I
will
kind
of
cover
everything
in
this
in
this
presentation
than
just
touch
on
the
differences
with
the
next
case.
J
The
property
is
2.29
Acres
The
Proposal
is
94
units,
the
property
is
Zone,
C2
has
as
much
of
the
surrounding
property
and
that's
shown
in
red
on
the
map
on
Lee
Highway,
all
the
way
to
Bonnie
Oaks
Drive,
the
R1
yellow
the
zoning
shown
in
light
yellow
is
R1
residential
Zone
and
some
of
the
opposition
live
in
in
that
area.
So
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
actually,
there
have
been
three
cases
in
the
immediate
area,
all
related
to
7725,
Lee
Highway,
which
is
in
the
ugc
zone,
shown
two
properties
away
from
this.
J
There's
a
mandatory
referral
case
in
21
for
the
acquisition
of
property
for
supportive
and
transitional
housing
by
the
city
in
2022,
a
request,
a
surplus
property
to
advertise
through
the
RFP
process,
to
develop
the
site
for
affordable
housing
and
case
2022
201
was
a
request.
Rezone
7725,
Lee
Highway
from
C2
to
ugc
to
develop
existing
hotels
and
affordable
housing
units
that
rezoning
was
approved
by
Council
in
November
of
22,
in
that
ugc
is
shown
on
the
map.
Is
that
pink
gray
cross
hatch,
which
is
a
little
bit
hard
to
see
on
the
map?
J
The
C2
convenience
Zone?
The
current
Zone
has
a
maximum
density
of
approximately
18
dwelling
units
an
acre,
and
this
is
based
on
a
calculation
in
the
zone
based
on
square
footage.
But
it's
roughly
18
units
an
acre.
The
existing
structure
contains
94
rooms,
So
based
on
the
lot
size
and
the
existing
C2
density
requirements.
A
total
of
70
rooms
can
be
converted
to
permanent
housing
on
the
site,
so
the
ugc
Zone
allows
for
higher
density
than
the
C2
zone.
J
There's
no
been
no
recent
zoning
history
for
this
exact
property,
but
the
next
case
on
your
agenda,
which
is
case
2022
263,
is
shown
on
the
map
just
immediately
vetting
the
site
to
the
Northeast
and
so
the
mix
of
uses,
as
you
know,
there's
several
motels,
there's
commercial
and
bacon
under
construction
and
I.
Believe
that's
for
Motel.
Also
shelford,
Road,
Lee
Highway
area
plan
recommends
a
heavy
business
mix
for
the
site.
J
This
is
defined
as
convenience:
commercial,
neighborhood
commercial
Regional
serving
planned,
Commerce
office's
high
density
residential
Light
Industry
Warehouse
wholesale
similar
uses,
so
a
pretty
robust
mix
of
uses
for
the
site
the
proposed
ugc
Zone
would
allow
uses
are
outlined
in
the
Shallowford
Road
Lee
Highway
area
plan.
The
ugc
Zone
allows
an
urban
development
form.
However,
the
proposals
to
reuse
existing
structure
staff
found
that
the
request
is
compatible.
The
zoning
request
is
compatible
with
the
Shallowford
Road
Lee
Highway
area
plan
and
surrounding
uses
and
staff
recommended
approval.
J
J
J
J
J
And
I
spoke
to
the
applicant
this
morning
and
they
are
proposing
zoning
conditions.
My
understanding
is
they've
met
with
the
interested
community
members
and
propose
these
in
mid-may
and
the
applicant
conveyed
that
he
has
not
heard
back
he's
understood
that
there
were
to
be
shared.
He
shared
them
with
everyone,
he
had
a
email
address
with,
but
he
hasn't
heard
back,
but
these
are
the
proposed
conditions.
The
applicant
is
because,
right
now
it
comes
with
a
Planning
Commission
recommendation
to
prove
ugc
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
add
these
conditions.
B
These
are
not
going
to
be
low,
rent
facilities,
they're
going
to
be
very
nice.
What
we
would
do
is
tie
the
development
to
this,
not
sort
of
kind
of
looks
like
this,
but
tie
it
to
this.
There
are
and
I'll
have
to
correct
me
it
one
two
and
three
bedroom
one
one
and
two
bedroom
apartments.
So
it's
not
what
everything
started
out
to
be.
It's
going
to
be
much
higher
end.
B
The
community's
seen
this
we're
not
showing
you
anything
that
the
community
hasn't
seen
the
community
was
asked
for
to
get
back
to
the
developer.
I
was
just
I
was
not
part
of
the
meetings.
I
was
sitting
back
listening
and
then
made
sure
that
the
developer
took
in
all
the
things
the
community
wanted,
and
he
did
the
only
thing
that
is
not
included
here
as
a
condition
and
I'm
not
sure
it
can
be
Phil.
B
B
D
B
They
were
assured
by
everyone
there
that
this
wasn't
the
city
doing
something.
This
was
more
of
the
people
that
lived
outside
the
city
talking,
but
City
wasn't
going
to
doing
something.
Subterfugee
and
so
I
just
want
you
to
know
that
that
could
come
up
next
week,
I'm,
not
asking
for
it
now
right,
but
just
please
know
that
that
may
come
up.
Okay,.
K
B
F
B
That
yeah
I'm
good,
with
whatever
sure
you
want
to
do
it
that
way:
Phil
I'm
fine
with
that
and-
and
this
covers
everything
every
concern-
I
know
of
that
doesn't
mean
other
things
won't
be
brought
up.
Everyone
in
the
world
has
participated
except
counsel,
so
I
thought
it
might
be
a
good
idea
for
you
all
to
see
the
the
truth
of
what's
being
proposed.
Okay,
Mr
Price
is
here.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I
I'm,
not
sure.
E
E
E
Is
there
any
intent
to
get
into
that
wooded
area
that
we're
seeing
now
yeah
yeah?
We
need
to
get
that
on
the
record.
Please
the
the
question
and
the
answer,
because
the
concerns
I
think
from
the
residents
obviously
is
is
a
lot
of
buffer
and
I.
Think
I
saw
something
about
a
30-foot
buffer
but
I'm,
seeing
a
lot
more
than
30
feet,
correct.
K
So
councilman
there
is
a
by
requirement
about
the
zoning
ordinance
that
there
be
a
30-foot
buffer
adjacent
to
the
residential.
So
by
De
fact,
de
facto.
We
we
call
that
out
as
being
a
minimum
to
be
provided.
There
are
several
utilities,
especially
sewer
that
run
apparently
from
the
current
hotel
sites,
to
a
sewer
main,
that
is
on
the
other
side
of
the
creek.
K
We
did
hear
from
the
last
meeting
that
apparently
that
sewer
clogs
from
time
to
time-
and
there
may
need
to
be
some
sort
of
work
done
to
that
which
would
be
in
that
buffer
area.
There
is
no
intent
or
proposal
to
develop,
along
and
through
there
in
the
back.
I
would
also
state
that
there
is
a
60-foot
water
quality
buffer
that
runs
along
that
Creek.
That
is
also
even
though
it's
not
spelled
out
as
a
zoning
requirement.
K
It
is
a
development
standard
that
we
have
here
in
the
city
in
the
state,
so
is
that
Waters
of
the
state,
it
is
Waters
of
the
state-
yes,
sir,
so
given
that
there's
there's
quite
a
buffer,
but
there
may
be
a
need
to
get
into
it
simply
to
take
care
of
some
utilities
that
need
some
work,
but
other
than
that.
There's
there's
no
development
plans
currently
that
that
I'm,
aware
of
to
do
anything
else
so.
K
Area
correct
and
the
way
that
the
the
the
city
regulations
work
is
if
we
disturb
the
buffer,
we
have
to
go
back
and
replant
and
revegetate
areas
in
through
there.
So
even
if
there
were
disturbance,
it's
not
like
it's
going
to
be
left
as
a
grass
strip.
If
you
will
that
would
punch
through
and
create
a
Vista
where
people
could
see
into
the
development
we'd
have
to
plant
back.
So
is.
B
K
B
K
B
B
K
B
E
E
J
Okay,
this
is
a
a
request
to
live
in,
amend
conditions
of
a
prior
city
council
ordinance.
There
was
quite
a
bit
of
opposition
to
this
case,
a
Planning
Commission
and
a
lot
of
email,
a
lot
of
emails
regarding
it,
the
properties
in
the
5200
block
of
Hunter
Road,
and
it's
currently
Zone
C2
with
conditions.
J
So
this
is
right
at
Hilltop
and
the
intersection
at
Lee,
Highway,
off
75
and
I'm,
just
going
to
start
with
rpa's
observation
is
that
from
the
input
was
that
this
is
a
case
about
rezoning,
this
property
commercial,
or
this
is
about
this
property.
Getting
approval
to
build
apartments,
and
so
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
And
if
we
hear
this
case
at
Council
next
week,
I
will
try
to
clarify
that
too.
J
We've
tried
to
be
clear
that
the
proposed
use
of
the
site,
which
is
apartment
and
then
a
mix
of
other
uses,
are
already
Allowed
by
the
zoning
departments
actually
in
particular,
are
allowed
by
the
zoning.
So
I
think
that
we've
made
the
point
of
Planning
Commission,
but
just
to
be
clear
and
I'm
going
to
go
quickly
to
the
site
plan,
just
to
kind
of
clarify
the
site
plan
site
the
site
plan
showing
Apartments
to
the
kind
of
the
northeast
of
the
site.
J
Excuse
me
the
Northwest
and
west
of
the
site
and
then
there's
a
future
Development
Area,
but
I
think
this
is
what
is
triggering
the
thought
that
council's
acting
on
apartments
here,
but
that's
not
the
case.
So
for
some
history,
a
portion
of
the
site
was
zoned
from
A1
to
C2
with
conditions
in
2012
by
County
Commission.
J
The
property
was
annexed
into
the
city
of
Chattanooga
and
in
2013
there
was
a
case
to
rezone
properties
to
establish
permanent
zones.
It's
very
similar
to
the
case
on
Clark
Road,
that's
on
council's
agenda,
which
is
temporary
to
permanent
zones.
The
request
was
approved,
subject
to
conditions
by
city
council
that
permanent
Zone
with
conditions
through
ordinance,
12703
and
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
amend
and
lift
conditions
from
that
ordinance.
J
So
the
conditions
put
in
place
by
County
Commission
were
carried
over
during
Council
action
on
the
permanent
zone
so
generally,
whatever
the
zone
is
in
the
unincorporated
County.
If
annexed,
we
try
to
kind
of
find
the
companion
Zone
in
the
city,
zoning
ordinance
and
those
that
case
says
conditions
carried
over.
J
J
The
applicant's
request,
there's
11
conditions,
the
applicant
requested
a
mix
of
changes
amending
two
related
to
use
not
recommending
any
change
related
to
adult
oriented
establishments,
liquor
stores
or
Winery
prohibitions,
and
then
conditions
6
through
11
were
related
to
Traffic
operations.
So
I
think
it'd
be
perhaps
best
handled
through
discussing
the
staff
recommendation,
which
was
the
staff
found.
J
The
request
is
compatible
with
the
Wolf
teever
Creek
area
plan
surrounding
land
uses
and
development
form
and
staff
recommending
amending
condition
number
one
and
two,
the
recommend
the
revised
condition
would
say
no
restaurants
or
other
establishments
serving
food
or
beverage.
Except
for
that
future
development
site
and
again,
you
kind
of
see
it
highlighted
in
red
the
portion
of
the
site.
That's
that
future
development
site,
so
not
the
entirety
of
the
site.
J
Just
that
area
would
be
reserved
to
have
the
ability
to
have
restaurants
and
other
establishments
the
same
for
hotels
and
motels,
and
that's
kind
of
following
the
site
plan
which
has
apartments
for
much
of
the
site
and
then
this
kind
of
future
Development
Area.
So
no
change
requested
for
adult
award
establishments.
It's
going
to
change
the
liquor
stores
or
wanter
is
austere,
prohibited
conditions.
J
So
let
me
make
sure
I
rephrase
that
correctly
staff
approved
six
through
ten
lifting
six
through
ten,
the
traffic
operational
ones
at
six
or
ten
and
recommended
keeping
that
deceleration
Lane.
However,
staff
recommended
to
replace
those
traffic
operational
conditions
with
a
new
condition
which
is
signalization
of
intersection
at
Hilltop,
Drive
and
Hunter
Road,
as
is
required,
unless
otherwise
determined
by
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
Public,
Works,
Transportation
division
and
so
I'm,
using
the
term
replacing
6
through
10.
J
With
this
condition,
and
then
I'll
note,
the
Planning
Commission
revised
the
condition
related
to
deceleration
lanes
and
they
recommended
and
the
Planning
Commission
recommendation
comes
from
decelerate
deceleration
lands
to
be
provided
at
both
entrances,
so
there's
a
chunk
of
conditions
that
are
being
lifted,
but
they're
being
replaced
with
a
more
holistic
condition.
Related
signalization
and
the
deceleration
Lane
has
been
Amplified
to
both
interests
instead
of
just
one
entrance.
J
The
two
use
conditions
we
talked
about,
lifting
those
that
chunk
of
traffic
operations,
condition
and
amending
the
deceleration
Lane
condition
to
be
required
that
be
provided
at
both
entrances,
so
just
kind
of
replacing
traffic
operational
conditions
with
some
updated
conditions,
and
we
did
work
with
our
partners
at
CDOT
on
that.
But
I
would
defer
to
Ben
if
he
has
I'm
using
the
term
replace
that's
my
term
if
Ben
has
anything
else.
He's
certainly
welcome
to
speak
to
that.
J
H
B
Yeah
this
again
was
is
a
project
that
has
a
lot
a
lot
of
energy.
Now
the
main
issues.
People
were
not
quite
understanding
that
this
was
not
a
rezoning
right
and
the
the
energy
should
be
and
was
placed
on
the
safety
conditions,
and
so
what
I'm
understanding
you
did
was
with
the
help
of
councilman
Ledford,
who
also
talked
to
the
people
and
assured
that
they
would
be
safe.
B
E
Is
that
Planning
Commission
Dr
Burns,
if
that's
a
lead
into
the
follow-up
on
that,
is
a
road
that
I
had
stated
in
that
meeting.
I
travel
actually
quite
regularly
and
I'm.
Aware
of
the
the
conditions
there
I
think
the
diesel
Lane
on
the
second
entrance
is
a
safety
concern
that
we
can
mitigate
right
now
and
I
think
it
should
be
in
the
plan
and
I
appreciate
the
applicant
working
with
me
to
to
put
that
condition
in
not
knowing
what
CDOT
has
moving
forward.
E
I
do
think,
as
you
are
traveling
a
hunter
road
towards
75
at
the
intersection
of
Harrison
and
Ooltewah
and
again
I
I
travel
this
road
very
frequently.
There
needs
to
be
some
sort
of
indicator
that
there
is
a
traffic
light
around
the
corner
and
I
think
that
we
would.
We
would
be
very
well
served
in
looking
at
that
option.
That
is
a
suggestion
that
is
probably
I.
E
Well,
I'm
going
to
let
I'm
going
to
lean
on
CDOT
Dr
Burrs
to
make
that
determination.
But
if
you
know
I
would
like
to
I
personally
think
it
would
I
mean
to
see
that
I
would
like
to
see
that
something
that
says:
hey
pay
attention,
that
is
a
very
kind
of
sneaky
Road
right
there
and
as
you
head
down
that
Hill
speed
is
something
that
I
have
noticed
many
many
times
just
taking
it
too
fast
and
I.
Think
anything
that
warns
you
and
gets
your
attention
is
a
win
for
everyone.
B
E
Ma'am,
as
you've
clearly
stated
and
Karen
has
clearly
said,
this
was
not
a
rezoning
case,
and
that
was
a
big
confusion
at
the
time
that
this
was
a
rezoning
for
apartments
that
zoning
has
been
in
place
for
many
many
years.
It
was
about
conditions
that
were
assigned
to
an
older
project
that
does
not
exist
anymore,
and
these
conditions
were
to
the
project
that
is
being
proposed,
am
I
right.
J
B
So
so
Mr
chair,
thank
you
for
your
help
with
this
and
I.
Think
with
that
it
we've
met
all
the
needs
of
the
folks
again.
I
wanted
a
complete
presentation,
because
the
only
people
who
haven't
been
part
of
all
of
this
is
the
Council
of
all.
My
colleagues
deserve
to
know
that
everything's
been
addressed
and
it
may
be
spirited
next
week.
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
yes,
ma'am.
Thank
you,
yeah,
all
right.
All.
E
F
J
A
couple
blocks
to
the
north
we've
had
quite
a
bit
of
activity
in
rezoning
in
the
kind
of
the
greater
Main
Street
area
and
then
between
Main
Street
and
East
13th
Street
in
the
national
cemetery
on
this
block.
There's
a
mix
of
a
single
unit,
residence
next
door,
there's
offices
and
Industrial
uses
on
the
Block.
This
is
the
site.
J
The
area
3
historic
River
to
Ridge
plan
recommends
mixed
residential
Place
type
for
the
site
and
that's
intended
to
provide
a
wide
range
of
housing
options
and
kind
of
close
to
walkable
destinations.
It
includes
moderate
to
higher
intensity
housing
options,
agencies
that
support
Transit
and
other
neighborhoods
serving
businesses.
The
proposed
ugc,
Zone
and
I
think
I
say
this
every
time
in
cases
like
this,
do
it
could
introduce
potential
new
nuisance
uses
again
compatible
development.
Remember
that
ug
season
is
the
tool
we're
using
for
urban
residential
infill,
but
does
so.
J
We
often
recommend
conditions
limiting
out
some
of
those
commercial
uses,
so
staff
did
recommend
conditions
relating
to
Houston
height.
In
order
to
ensure
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and
support
the
plan
recommendation.
There
was
opposition
present.
There
was
a
gentleman
I
believe
he
owns
the
office
next
door
to
the
site.
He
thought
that
three
stories
was
too
high.
He
thought
the
development
needs
to
match.
14Th
Street
I
think
he
was
thinking.
J
The
proposed
development
form
was
more
similar
to
Main
Street
and
more
one
block
off
Main
Street
here
and
I'm
just
concerned
about
the
loss
of
you,
Planning
Commission
determined
the
similar
to
staff.
The
request
is
compatible
with
the
plan
and
it
uses
in
the
area
and
is
giving
a
recommendation
approved,
with
condition
for
residential
uses
only
in
maximum
Building
height
of
three
stories,
foreign.
F
Think
you
made
me
up
before:
okay,
thank
you.
Mr
chair,
I
actually
have
not
gone
by
the
site
to
look
at
it,
but
no
one
has
actually
reached
out
to
me
in
opposition
of
so,
as
always,
do
I
like
to
go
out
and
at
least
knock
on
a
couple
of
doors
or
areas
and
see
what
super
thoughts
are
to
make
sure
they
know
what
is
going
to
happen
or
what
is
trying
to
be
down
there.
E
J
J
This
is
2519
Bailey,
Avenue,
rezoning
from
R2
residential
Zone
to
ugc,
with
conditions
to
develop
multi-unit
residential
with
14
units
and
four
stories,
and
then
the
proposed
condition
was
just
related
to
residential
use.
Only
the
site
is
one
Macaulay
school
is
on
the
Eastern
side
of
Dodds
there
just
to
help
you
Orient
the
site,
surrounded
primarily
by
single-family
residential
land
uses
with
two
family
multi-family
uses
in
the
area.
J
Our
commercial
uses,
they're
shown
there
as
kind
of
office
right
at
the
corner
of
Bailey
and
Dodds
and
again
College
school
is
that
kind
of
starting
that
large
green
field.
On
the
other
side
of
Dodds,
the
site
is
neighboring
commercial
zones
and
uses
of
the
intersection
of
Balian
dots
and
staff
felt
that
the
ugc
Zone
with
conditions
can
serve
as
a
transitional
zone
between
the
commercial
uses
at
the
corner
of
Dodds
heading
more
to
the
interior
of
the
community.
With
that
residential
Zone.
J
J
J
Planning
Commission
determined
the
request
is
compatible
with
adopted
plan
and
land
uses
and
recommended
approval
with
us.
Three
conditions
similar
to
staff.
A
highlighted
condition.
Number
two
in
blue
I'd
received
an
email
from
councilman
kunra
that
asked
to
add
a
condition
to
have
a
fourth
floor.
So
the
original
excuse
me
a
fourth
I
think
story
or
floor,
and
the
original
proposal
was
for
four
stories.
Staff
felt
that
for
compatibility,
dropping
the
height
would
be
more
compatible
understood
from
the
email
that
the
applicant
and
councilman
coonrod
were
able
to
meet
in
that.
E
E
J
We
have
had
some
discussion
with
the
city
attorney
about
the
ugc
and
the
requirements
and
I
guess
I,
think
of
them
as
two
different
I
guess,
I.
Think
of
it
as
two
ways.
The
ugc
Zone
established
here
would
not
allow
a
liquor
store
because
it's
conditioned
to
residential
uses.
Only
so
there's
no
bar
beer
sales
liquor
stores,
however
you're
correct,
and
that
there
is
no
distance
requirement
from
a
ugc.
So
the
so
I
think
there's
two
what
is
happening
in
the
zone,
the
cell
and
what
is
that
zone
impacting
in
a
tread?
J
E
E
Only
that
we
kind
of
have
a
list
of
things
on
the
commercial
side,
so
that
people
when
they
read
the
condition,
for
example,
residential
use
only
to
you
and
I,
may
trigger
that
thought,
but
it
won't
trigger
that
thought
with
a
next
door
neighbor
or
someone
who
just
is
reading
it,
that
they
think
well,
I,
read
ugc
alcohol
is
allowed
or
not
does
not
cover
the
500
foot
parameter.
Is
there
a
way
I
think
communication
is
always
key
to.
Let
people
know
that
that
residential
use
only
kind
of
knocks
out?
J
What
is
R4
R4
special
Zone?
Yes
ma'am?
Is
it
I'm,
not
sure
of
the
question?
Is
it
like?
Is
it
a
residential
zone
or
is
it
a
special
zone
or
a
commercial
Zone?
Yes,
I
think
it
is
a
hybrid,
and
we
talked
about
this
recently
with
khmeris
and
Zoning
code
was
what
kind
of
zone
is
it,
but
it
does
it's
kind
of
the
that
allows
that
range
of
uses.
J
I
So,
in
keeping
with
the
theme
of
this
of
this
conversation
about
residential
use,
only
what
it
is
and
isn't
now
that
we
have
officially
adopted
the
new
short-term
vacation
rental
ordinance,
ugc
would
typically
be
one
that
would
allow
short-term
vacation
rentals
and
Phil
I'd
like
to
understand
from
you.
If
we
have
Clarity
under
the
law
when
we
say
residential
uses,
only
good
question
is
that
is
that
Clarity
enough
to
say
that
this
is
a
long-term
rental
or
permanent
residence
versus
a
short-term
residence?