►
From YouTube: City Council Committee Meeting
Description
City Council Committee Meeting - Captured Live on Ustream at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/city-council-committee-meeting
A
A
A
C
C
B
Resolution
authorizing
the
approval
of
change
order,
number
one
for
Hazen
and
Sawyer
for
professional
services
for
design
and
construction
phase
services
relating
to
contract
number
w14,
zero,
zero.
Six
one
zero
one
mackenson
been
w
WT
p
is
secondary,
secondary
clarifier
upgrades
a
consent
decree
project
for
an
increased
amount
of
nine
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
six
dollars
for
a
revised
contract
amount
not
to
exceed
1
million
nine
hundred
thirty
nine
thousand
three
hundred
and
sixty
six
dollars.
E
B
Resolution
authorizing
the
award
of
contract
number
P,
sixteen
zero,
zero,
five,
two
zero
one:
two
advanced
training
systems,
inc
of
st.
paul,
indiana,
hcso,
CP
d
target
system
in
the
amount
of
eighty
eight
thousand
one
hundred
and
thirty
dollars
when
the
contingency
amount
in
the
amount
of
four
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
for
an
amount
not
to
exceed
ninety
two
thousand
five
hundred
thirty
dollars.
E
B
Please
a
resolution
authorizing
the
approval
of
change
order,
number
one
for
Lane
and
liner
LLC
of
turkey,
Georgia
relative
to
contract
number
W,
1202
nine
to
zero
one
fires,
branch
enter
interceptor
and
basin
improvements,
a
constant
decree
project
for
an
increased
amount
of
1
million.
Six
hundred
fifty
six
thousand
six
hundred
and
thirty-two
dollars
to
reduce
the
contingency
amount
of
200
million
for
a
revised
contract
amount
not
to
exceed
nine
million.
Five
hundred
and
thirty
seven
thousand
three
hundred
ninety
one
dollars
and
fifty
cents
for
a
total
amount
of
nine
million.
B
F
D
F
G
Good
afternoon
yeah,
so
this
particular
work
is
about
four
thousand
linear
feet
of
30-inch
diameter
interceptor
pipe
line
that
needs
to
be
rehabilitated.
So
Donald
is
correct.
There's
available
funds
in
the
loan
use
it
or
you
lose
it,
and
this
particular
project
was
on
the
next
FY
18
capital.
So
we
decided
to
do
it
now,
while
the
monies
possessor
epic
lines
are
hard
to
come
by.
B
Resolution
authorizing
the
approval
of
change
order,
number
one
for
CDM,
Smith
Inc
for
professional
services
for
design
and
construction,
free
services,
relative
to
contract
number
w12,
0,
26,
1,
0,
2,
DuPont
pump
station
and
based
on
improvements,
phase,
2,
a
consent,
decree
project
for
an
increased
amount
of
hundred
nine
hundred
and
eighty-five
thousand
two
hundred
and
eighty
four
dollars.
Eight
cents
for
every
vice
contract
amount
not
to
exceed
two
million
five
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
eight
hundred
eighty
four
dollars
and
eight
cents
councilman.
B
Clerk
a
resolution
authorizing
the
approval
of
change
order,
number
one
for
ch2m,
Hill
Engineers
for
professional
services
for
design
and
construction,
freight
services
relative
to
contract
number
W
1500,
two
one:
zero
one:
fires:
branch,
South,
Chickamauga,
Creek,
five,
interceptor
rehabilitation,
the
constant
to
creep
a
constant
decree
project
for
an
increased
amount
of
one
hundred
and
four
thousand
one
hundred
and
thirty
dollars.
Revised
contract
amount
not
to
exceed
nine
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
eighty
dollars.
Councilman.
D
G
G
B
Ma'am
clerk,
a
resolution
authorizing
the
approval
of
change
order;
number
four
for
burns
at
McDonald's
engineering,
company
for
professional
services
for
design
and
construction
phase
services
relating
to
contract
number
w12,
zero,
one,
six
zero
one:
two
sit:
sit:
Eco,
CS,
o
TF
and
pump
station
improvements,
a
consent
decree
project
for
an
increased
amount
of
six
thousand;
seven
hundred
and
thirty
nine
dollars
and
ninety
two
cents
for
a
revised
contract
amount
not
to
exceed
five
hundred
and
twenty
six
thousand
seven
hundred
twenty
dollars
and
sixty
two
cents.
Councilman.
B
Resolution
authorizing
the
administrator
for
the
Department
of
Public
Works
to
enter
into
blanket
contracts
for
professional
services
for
the
support
of
wastewater
capital
improvements,
program,
contract
number,
W,
1800,
one
for
the
19
consultant
firms
and
submitted
qualifications
in
the
six
different
categories
pair,
their
per
their
qualification
package
for
one
year
of
a
term
up
to
five
years
with
this
year's
amount
to
be
no
more
than
a
7.5
million.
So.
D
C
I
Certainly,
thank
you,
members
of
the
council,
the
this
particular
grouping.
So
this
is
a
pre-qualification
of
professional
services
for
doing
both
design
services,
as
well
as
construction
oversight
for
projects
that
have
to
do
with
the
wastewater
system.
We
first
went
through
this
process
about
five
or
six
years
ago,
the
very
first
time
in
order
to
prequalify,
and
that
term
was
also
for
approximately
five
years
so
and
at
that
time
it
was
a.
We
were
not
using
blanket
contracts
for
these
types
of
processes,
and
so
that's
the
that's.
I
So
in
this
case,
this
is
for
a
five-year
pre-qualification
of
the
19
vendors
and
there
are
the
six
different
subcategories
that
we
have
that
are
listed
for
each
one
of
those
and
so
those
19
or
qualified.
Some
of
them
are
in
more
than
one
area
and
so
for
the
five-year
term.
We
would
come
back
at
the
end
of
the
of
each
year
and
get
renewal
from
the
council
in
order
to
proceed
into
the
next
year
and
there
would
be
an
additional
authorization
amount
for
each
subsequent
renewal
year.
I
The
deputy
director
of
waste
resources
can
can
help
step
through
that
that
process,
in
terms
of
how
we
select
from
within
that
in
order
to
make
sure
that
there's
equity
among
those
that
are
selected
both
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
we
match
up
the
right
amount
of
qualifications
as
well
as
with
those
that
it
may
have
already
gotten
a
previous
contract,
and
we
would
have
done
a
release
so
going
forward.
What
you'll
see
is
you'll
see
these
renewals
that
are
meant
that
move
forward,
but
we
will
have
this
process
that
goes
so.
I
C
So
they're
pre-qualified
people,
and-
and
obviously
you
have
to
do
that,
however,
anything
$25,000
or
above
still
comes
before
council
am
I
correct
that
the
net
effect
of
this
is
taking
this
away
from
council.
You
have
carte
blanche
to
spend,
however,
you
want
as
long
as
it's
with
a
qualified
person.
E
E
A
I
For
these,
for
these
specific
subtypes,
you
know
we
could
there
is
there.
Is
the
option
to
be
able
to
choose
off
of
that
I'm
at
this
point,
I
might
ask
Bonnie
Bonnie
Woodward
to
be
able
to
speak
to
that
in
terms
of
what
that
process
is.
But
this
is
this
is
an
effort
in
order
to
be
able
to
save
time
in
going
through
those.
J
To
clarify
from
our
overall
perspective,
what
they
are
attempting
to
do
is
to,
and
instead
of
per
project
conduct,
a
what's
called
a
request
for
qualification
process
right
now.
They
are
conducting
that
in
a
fashion
that
is
specific
to
each
project
and
they're,
wanting
to
pull
that
to
a
more
broad
level
and
foresee
there
their
projects
for
a
respective
year
and
award
a
blanket
and
get
the
the
full
amount
approved.
J
So
the
consolidated
equivalent
of
these
per
project
approvals
that
council
has
been
used
to
seeing
they're
wanting
to
get
them
approved
through
this
body
in
a
batch
in
a
in
a
general
blanket
contract
and
then
apply
them
to
the
specific
projects
as
applicable
as
as
they
manage
them.
Because
a
project
is
a
is
a
is
a
total
of
multiple
contracts.
J
So
basically
they
are
wanting
to
they're
wanting
to
make
the
process
more
efficient
and
not
and
not
conduct
a
a
public
solicitation
process
which
involves
advertising
money
staff
time
every
time
that
this
is
done
if
they
are
able
to
adequately
describe
what
they're
needing
the
professional
service
that
they're
needing
for
a
year
and
a
more
broad
level.
That
is
not
specific
to
a
project,
so
it's
basically
it's
and
from
purchasing
standpoint.
It's
basically
a
facilitation
difference,
but
but
what
the
value
that
you
get
from
oversight
does
not
change.
A
K
A
K
K
K
C
C
C
C
I
Right
each
and
these
are
this-
is
for
the
professional
service
Asad.
So
each
of
the
construction
contracts
is
still
going
to
come
forward,
so
council
council
is
still
making
budgetary
appropriation,
so
the
projects
that
these
dollars
come
from
are
from
from
line
items
that
are
that
are
in
the
budget.
That's
been
approved,
let.
C
L
C
I
C
I
I
I
For
the
for
these
design
services
in
the
7.5
right
within
the
7.5,
those
would
be
done.
Those
will
be
done
by
an
internal
committee
using
a
criteria
and,
as
I
mentioned
a
moment
ago,
Jeff
Rose
who's,
the
deputy
director
of
waste
resources,
is,
can
can
outline
that
we're
prepared
to
go
over
that
today,
as
well.
If
you'd
like
to
hear
about
that
process,
does.
M
M
I
Are
these
are
these
are
staff?
These
are
staff
positions
that
are
that
are
already
part
of
the
process
it
even
even
up
to
in
the
process
that
we've
had
to
this
point.
These
are
people
who
have
already
been
involved
in
in
making
recommendations
to
City
Council.
So
it's
just
a
matter
of
so
everything
prior
to
this.
It's
similar
people
that
are
doing
that
same
type,
work
already
as
part
of
their
job.
Ok,.
M
F
H
I
This
this
particular
RFQ
is
written
in
such
a
way
that
we're
not
act,
we're
not
going
to
sign
contracts
with
all
19
at
once.
It
was
stated
in
the
RFQ
that
we
would
sign
contracts
with
them
as
they
were
selected
for
individual
projects,
so
so
each
individual
project,
so
then
that
they,
they
are
told
as
part
of
the
RFQ
there.
So
they
are
purely
submitting
qualifications
about
how
about
their
ability
to
be
able
to
perform
this
type
of
work.
I
And
then,
as
we
have
a
project
and
they're
selected
for
it,
then
we
will
actually
sign
that
contract
at
that
point
in
time.
So
this
is
a
blanket
contract.
In
this
case
is,
is
a
mechanism
in
order
to
be
able
to
to
perform
the
the
pre-qualification.
Without
this
step,
we
can't
go
to
the
next
step,
which
is
being
able
to
to
notify.
This
is
our
this
is
our
way
of
notifying
these
19
that
yes,
you've
submitted
yes,
you're
qualified
to
do
this
work.
I
This
is
the
work
that
you're
qualified
to
do,
and
now
we
can
move
to
the
next
step
of
being
able
to
select
and
begin
negotiations
with
any
of
those
folks,
so
with
it
without
this.
So
this
is
this
in
this
particular
case,
because
of
the
way
the
RFQ
is
written,
it's
it's
it's
a
step
along
the
way
in
moving
towards
that.
How.
A
I
Landscaping,
the
Landscape,
Architecture
surveying
and
geo
environmental
work
are
all
in
our
PR
services.
We
do
have
separate
blanket
contracts
for
each
one
of
those.
Some
of
those
firms
that
are
on
those
contracts
are
also
in
this,
but
not
every
one
of
these
contracts
participate
in
those
other
five
that
I
mentioned
now,
those
those
other
RFQ
s
are
written
differently,
and
so
they,
this
one
is
this
one
is
written
a
little
differently
in
terms
of
how
the
qualification
comes
first
and
the
contract
comes
second
with
with
selection
for
an
individual
project.
H
So
we
have
done
services
like
this
in
the
past,
but
not
this
way
correct
correct.
So
what
do
we
say?
What
are
we
saving
again
by
doing
this
dollar
amount
wise?
We
don't
saying
it
because
what's
gonna
trigger
us
to
know
in
the
future,
because
we
don't
bring
it
up
who
gonna
trigger
they're,
saying
it's
coming
up
again.
Well,.
I
Every
year
it
we,
the
public
works,
will
have
to
present
the
resolution
for
renewals,
so
I
think
we
most
recently
have
have
submitted
some
of
the
other
blankets
for
renewal,
I.
Think
within
the
last
three
or
four
weeks
there
have
been
two
different
professions:
do
different
blanket
professional
services
contracts
that
have
come
before
the
council.
One
was
for
on-call
storm
water,
modeling
and
the
other
one
was
for
landscape
architecture
services,
both
of
which
were
professional
services
for
long
call
on
call
professional
services.
They
were
just
in
there
in
a
different
area
of
professional
service,
so.
I
We
would
we
would
come
back
asking
for
renewal
or
if,
in
the
case
you
know-
and
you
know-
certainly
anything
is
yeah
things-
things
are
possible
just
like
the
comment
was
made
earlier
about
the
council
being
able
to
say
no,
don't
renew
you
move
forward.
Those
are
decisions
that
the
department
and
purchasing
we
do
that
with
every
blanket
contract,
whether
professional
services
or
not,
or
is
that
something
we
want
to
do
or
do
we
think
the
scope
has
changed?
Do
we
think
our
need
has
changed?
I
Do
we
think
the
vendors
that
are
there
provide
different
services,
and
so
there's
always
that
option
which
we
would
have
to
do
in
advance
to
riad
ver
ties
it
again,
so
those
that
would
be
something
the
department
would
do
and
work
with
purchasing
in
that.
But
it's
not
our
expectation
that
we
would
do
that
in
with
us.
There
was
a
so.
I
Then
the
the
penalty
would
be
in
terms
of
schedule
and
in
time
for
us,
you
know,
certainly
your
staff
time
now,
dollar-wise,
there's
no
there's
no
guarantee
to
any
of
these
19
that
they
will
get
any
work
or
all
of
the
work
or
some
portion
of
the
work.
So
there's
no
written
guarantee
to
any
of
them
that
they'll
get
a
prescribed
amount
of
work.
So
this
is
not
a
requirements
contract,
it's
a
blanket
contract
which
gives
us
the
authorization
to
use
them.
I
That
does
not
require
us
to
use
them
and
then
so
in
terms
of
penalties
for
backing
up.
If
we,
if
we
got
to
the
point
that
11
months
from
now,
we
were
asking
for
renewal
so
that
we
could
renew
it
before
it
expired,
and
we
were
advised
to
back
up
and
and
resubmit
an
RFQ,
then
without
an
extension
of
some
sort
to
get
us
beyond
the
time
it
takes
to
prepare
the
RFQ
you
advertise
that
score
those
participants
and
come
back
with
an
with
another
blanket
contract.
I
Then
we
would
be
several
months
behind
this
process
didn't
doing
it.
This
way,
as
opposed
to
individual
project,
saves
us
anywhere
from
three
to
six
months
of
time
that
we
save.
So
if
we
were
to
come
back
11
months
from
now
asking
for
a
renewal
and
the
answer
was,
we
think
you
should
do
it
differently,
then
we
would,
at
that
point,
have
to
ask
for
a
minimum
of
a
six-month
extension
to
give
us
enough
time
to
prepare
the
RFQ.
H
I
Correct,
because
these
are
not
solicitations
based
on
price,
so
I
mean
that's.
You
know
every
time
you
you're
not
allowed
under
state
law
to
to
compete
these
on
price
that
we
have
to
do
it
based
on
qualifications.
So
when
we
get
to
a
project,
we
negotiate
both
the
scope
of
the
work
and
the
fee
to
perform.
Those
services
have
to
be
negotiated
individually.
Okay,.
M
P
M
I
Once
in
it
once
this
is
a
once,
this
blanket
is
approved,
then
we
would
have.
We
would
be
able
to
complete
the
process
of
notifying
selected
and
selected
firm
for
the
next
projects
and
move
at
that
point
immediately
into
into
scope
and
fee
negotiations,
and
so
for
whether
there's
a
project
that
is
known
or
it
comes
up
immediately.
Then
we
could
enter
straight
into
that
without
having
to
write
an
RFQ
in
order
to
define
that
that
particular
project
and
advertise
and
wait
on
that
project.
Yes,
great.
I
Very
very
good
question:
we
do
have
a
process
in
place
for
that
and
Jeff
I
know:
you've
you've
gone
through
what
that
process
is,
and
he
can
he
can
speak
to
what
that
process
is,
but
obviously
for
each
one
of
those.
In
terms
of
you
know,
there's
there's
an
equity
component
to
that
process
of
selection
and
that's
something
that
as
we
go
through,
that,
that
is
something
that
would
be
tracked
and
would
be
available
and.
M
I
M
C
C
L
E
L
Get
we
can
get
copies
to
you,
but
it's
basically
it's
it's
about
creating
equity
in
the
system,
and
so
we
have
five
different
criteria.
We
score
things
on.
The
first
was
their
score
in
their
category
that
they're
submitting
on.
If
it's
maybe
a
wastewater
plant
project,
what
did
they
score?
How
are
they
able
to
do
that
project?
That
was
a
process
bill
was
talking
about
through
the
RFQ.
Then
we
look
at
project
eligibility.
Do
they
have
a
project
already
in
this
batch
of
srf
loans?
If
they
do,
they
get
fewer
points.
Do
they
have?
L
How
much
fee
do
they
have
already
for
this
match
of
projects?
If
they
have
already
gotten
the
project,
it
has
a
pretty
high
fee.
They
get
fewer
points.
So
we
begin
to
balance
how
we
spread
the
projects
out
among
consultants
and
then
there's
also,
how
much
do
they
know
about
the
project?
Maybe
they
did
a
phase
one,
so
it
makes
sense
that
they
do
phase
two,
that
sort
of
thing
and.
C
So
let
me
ask
you
one
other
thing
and
then
and
then
I
don't
well.
I
do
see
some
other
lights,
but
so
you
mentioned
Bill
I.
Think
you
mentioned
that
if
we
decide
we
want
to
go
to
another
way
of
doing
things,
but
don't
want
to
renew
this
way
of
doing
things.
Actually,
you've
got
to
give
us
six
months
notice
to
people.
Is
that
what
you're
saying
well
I.
I
There
are
projects
that
are,
there
will
be
consent,
decree
projects
that
will
be
designed
out
of
this
process,
and
so
it
is
because
that's
a
multi-year,
a
multi-year
process
and
we're
only
talking
now
about
the
first
year
dollars,
because
that
that
that
time
lag
would
would
push
across
into
a
second
year
those
those
projects
that
we
would
need
in
a
you
know
in
the
first
few
months
of
the
year.
To
of
this
blanket
authorization
we
would
need
to
have
sufficient
time
in
order
to
make
sure
so.
I
C
I
K
C
Got
that
yeah
I
got
that
I
was
going
on
on
what
Bill
was
saying
chief,
that
a
lot
of
these
they're?
Not
they
don't
end
at
the
end
of
a
year.
They're
big
projects
I
got
that
so
it's
kind
of
and
I
was
picking
up
on.
Councilman
Gilbert's
question
it's.
So
it's
a
bit
of
an
illusion.
It
we're
almost
for
a
good
reason.
L
Having
to
renew
we
have
the
SRF
package,
it
has
a
certain
amount
of
money
in
it,
and
so
the
the
projects
that
come
out
of
that
one
package
will
carry
through
until
they're
finished.
If
it
takes
five
years
to
finish
that
particular
project
I.
Can
that
particular
contract,
then
that
and
it's
the
same
7.5
million
that
we're
talking
about
that
will
carry
them
in
the
next
year.
We'll
have
we
have
another
srf
package?
We
could
have
another
another
course
of
projects
we
become.
R
Thank
you,
I'm
confused
yeah,
then
just
confused
because
I'm
reading
it,
but
what
it
screaming
is
we
trying
to
ease
a
project
past
you
that's
what
it
say
to
me,
but
I'd
like
to
know
because
I'm,
like
Stacy
I,
don't
like
to
be
caught
off
guard.
So
what
are
you
guys
really
trying
to
do
move.
D
L
Most
of
these
projects
are
extremely
designed,
intensive,
labor,
intensive
expertise
intensive
and
we
just
don't
have
the
staff
to
even
come
close
to
doing
most
of
these.
These
are
large
projects.
Where
we're
you
know,
some
of
them
are
a
million
dollar
design
fee,
and
that's
a
lot
of
time
that
there's
just
no
way
we
could
do
it
in-house.
L
L
L
Can't
hire
the
people,
we
would
need
to
do
this
kind
of
work.
We
don't
pay
enough
for
one
thing,
but
we
we
would
take
too
many
people
for
us
to
bring
in
and
have
to
manage.
That's
why
we
have
a
program
manager
so
that
they
can
do
that.
Work.
We've
done
it
before
all
over
the
country.
We've
done
it
now
for
about
five
years.
L
We've
learned
a
lot
about
it,
but
it's
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
to
keep
the
thing
moving
so
that
we
stay
on
top
of
our
consent
decree
schedule
and
make
sure
we
meet
our
marks.
You
know
that
are
laid
out
in
the
consent
decree.
If
we
don't
do
that,
we
start
having
fines
put
on
us
that
sort
of
thing.
So
that's
where
it's
coming
from.
Okay.
R
S
Thank
You
chair
I,
just
out
of
like
even
with
the
people
sitting
in
the
crowd,
I,
don't
know
if
they
in
the
audience
don't
know
they
understand.
Even
with
the
council
hearing
the
questions
that
are
going
on
definitely
want
to
move.
The
city
forward
definitely
understand
that
we
do
have
a
wastewater,
this
consent
decree.
We
do
have
issues.
S
If
you
back
up
the
agenda,
we
just
spent
approved
over
ten
million
dollars
so
to
say,
and
now
it's
another
seven
million-
and
it's
just
questions
because
people
that
are
streaming,
people
that
are
in
the
audience
are
gonna
ask
us
what's
going
on,
but
I'm
you
know,
and
it's
like
I
can't
explain
it.
I,
don't
really
understand
and
you
guys
are
up
here.
It's
really
trying
to
put
your
best
foot
forward
and
explain
to
us
what's
going
on,
but
it's
just
it
to
me.
S
It's
not
clear
to
understand,
and
then,
with
this
I
know,
we
approver
off
record
it's
a
paving
budget
that
we
approve
and
it
can
things
that
can
get
paid.
You
really
don't
have
to
come
in
front
of
the
council
due
to
a
scale
that
has
been
set
up.
You
got,
they
can
pave
different
areas
and
we
don't
really
have
a
say-so.
So
when
this
7.5
million
is
done,
if
there's
one
project
saved,
one
project
costs
five
million
dollars
this
year.
That
can
be
done
without
coming
in
front
of
us.
If
we
approve
this
today
correct.
L
D
S
I
understand
and
I
think
just
the
confusion
I'm
having
can
speak.
Other
counsel
is
that
once
we
say
seven
once
we
say
yesterday:
7.5
million
dollars,
we
have
it's
nothing
else
that
can
really
be
saved
from
our
standpoint
and
we
have
to
articulate
it
to
constituents
that
are
listening
and
that
are
reading
these
agendas.
They
want
to
know
hey.
What
are
you
guys
doing
with
our
money?
What
are
you
guys
doing?
How
are
you
spending
our
money
and
we
have
to
be
able
to
articulate
it
our
best
and
I?
S
D
K
So,
council-
and
the
only
other
thing
I'll
add-
is
that
the
projects
that
we're
talking
about
executing
what
these
dollars
are
laid
out
in
the
capital
improvement
documents
that
the
council
votes
on
every
year
during
the
budget.
So
it's
timely
that
we're
having
this
discussion
right
now
about
when
and
how
projects
could
approve,
which
is
different
than
how
and
when
vendors
get
approved.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
determination.
K
There
is
a
little
bit
of
differentiation
between
what
projects
and
what
people
and-
and
so
we
were
just
talking
back
here,
I,
think
and-
and
the
council
has
made
it
clear-
that
moving
capital
projects
along
fast
is
a
huge
priority
to
everybody
on
this
on
the
council
and
so
we're
looking
at
how
we
do
that
better,
and
this
is
one
way
that
we
can
do.
That
is.
We
can
create
better
procurement
methods.
K
So
we
estimate
we
can
be
able
to
shave
off
two
to
three
months
from
implementation
by
going
with
a
faster
bidding
strategy,
and
so
we
appreciate
the
feedback
and
we're
happy
to
keep
looking
at
it
tweaking
it.
Take
this
into
account
and
maybe
meet
with
the
public
works
chairperson
to
make
sure
there's
some
additional
clarity
and
if
there
needs
to
be
additional
reporting
mechanisms
or
thing
like
that,
that
can
be
put
in
place
to
increase
the
confidence
and
the
transparency
of
the
process.
K
H
L
What
we
did
was
we
created
an
request
for
request
for
qualifications,
and
so
we
wrote
that
our
division
wrote
that
in
conjunction
with
purchasing-
and
we
asked
engineering
consulting
firms
to
submit
their
qualifications
on
these
six
different
areas
and
that's
what
they
did,
they
sent
us
actual
documents
and
we
look
through
them
and
and
grade
each
one.
So.
H
L
I
I
There
so
there's
a
there's
two
pieces
that
the
first
one
is
to
document
that
these
19
firms
responded
to
was.
It
was
an
RFQ
that
was
written
by
public
works
in
conjunction
with
purchasing,
so
that
was
written
by
the
city
submitted
out
publicly
for
the
for
the
professional
services
community.
To
respond
to
so
the
city
wrote
it,
they
responded
so.
H
I
Multiple
multiple
people
from
the
city
side
wrote
this
and
put
it
out
there
to
say
this
is
the
type
of
work
that
we're
going
to
do.
Moving
forward
those
individual
projects,
the
city
will
specify
what
what
is
the
scope?
What
do
we
want
the
project
to
achieve
and
what
are
some
of
the?
What
are
some
of
the
technical
criteria
that
the
project
has
to
meet?
In
some
cases,
the
consultants
will
help
us
develop.
I
Some
of
that
that
we
may
use
from
a
consultant,
and
we
may
provide
it
to
a
different
consultant.
So,
for
example,
one
of
these
subcategories
has
to
do
with
with
master
planning.
So
we
may,
we
may
take
information.
We
may
a
consultant
may
help
us
to
do
some
master
planning
on
one
side,
and
then
we
may
take
that
information
and
use
that
for
some
specific
individual
project
criteria.
I
So
there
are
times
whenever
the
consultants
are
helping
us
with
planning,
and
then
there
are
other
times
when
we're
directing
and
we're
saying
we
want
a
project
that
does
X.
We
need
to.
We
need
to
increase
capacity
at
this
pump
station
and
do-
and
this
is
what
it
needs
to
do.
We
know
we
need
to
go
from
30
million
gallons
a
day
to
45
million
gallons
a
day
at
this
pump
station
and
so
defining
those
types
of
things.
What
types
of
pumps,
what
size
of
the
lines,
those
those
types
of
things.
I
H
L
L
M
Legend.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
one
last
question:
if
I
can
chief,
are
you
still
here,
I
appreciate
the
efficiency
mindset
of
this
and
I
and
I
think
I
get
it
as
a
small
business
owner
we're
working
on
something
right
now
that
we've
got
to
get
done
in
so
we're
looking
at
every
angle,
so
I
do
appreciate
you
taking
that
position.
So
my
question
is:
could
you
theoretically
paint
us
a
picture
of
how
this
could
work
and
give
us
some
kind
of
numbers,
for
example,
and
I?
Don't
I
don't
mean
right?
This
second.
M
For
next
week,
this
is
on
for
next
week,
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
if
we
could
look
at
maybe
a
model
of
an
anticipated
savings
in
time
moving
the
project
along
quicker
and
then,
if
you
could
maybe
think
about
some
sort
of
reporting
mechanism
that
this
council
could
ask
for
and
see.
That
would
help
kind
of
lay
this
out
and
in
easy
to
understand
terms.
Be.
M
A
You,
madam
chair
I,
want
to
know
why
Eddie
Taylor's
here
he
was
asked
to
come
to
this
meeting
today
and
I,
don't
see
anything
on
the
agenda
and
so
I
got
dates
wrong.
Oh
I'm,
sorry
about
that
Eddie!
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Okay,.
C
C
B
Clerk
a
resolution
authorizing
the
administrator
for
the
Department
of
Transportation
to
enter
into
a
partnership
agreement
with
Cameron
Harbour
south
lot,
1
GP
for
Parkway
poorhouse,
located
at
8:01,
riverfront
Parkway
project
number
T,
18001
8:04,
and
to
accept
a
contribution
of
fifteen
thousand
one
hundred
and
seventy
eight
dollars
and
38
cents
towards
the
cost
of
six
pedestrian
light.
Poles,
luminaries,
conduits
and
installation.
B
N
B
B
Authorizing
the
administrator
for
the
Department
of
Transportation
to
enter
into
agreement
with
geo
stabilization
International
for
construction
services
relative
to
contract
number
T
1600
for
two
zero
one
associated
with
construction
services
for
soap
civilization,
along
Grenada
Drive,
originally
established
by
City
Council
action
on
May
30
2017
to
increase
the
contract
amount
by
ninety
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
for
a
final
revised
contract
amount
of
three
hundred
fifty
thousand
three
hundred
forty
dollars
in
accordance
with
specifications,
as
shown
on
statewide
contract
swc,
one
nine
eleven.
We.
C
M
A
M
T
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
the
property
located
at
1700
d'agde
Avenue
from
our
two
residential
zone
to
UGC
urban
general
commercial
zone,
to
accommodate
a
redevelopment
of
the
site
for
a
business
we've
deferred
a
few
weeks
to
for
allow
the
councilman
Coonrod
to
meet
with
the
applicant
and
make
sure
she's
fully
briefed
on
what
is
being
proposed
there.
So
I'll
defer
to
her
if
she
has
any
comments,
but
we
briefed
council
about
him
I
think
several
weeks
ago
at
the
committee
meeting,
so
I
have
nothing
else
to
add.
M
T
T
T
First
phase
will
be
fact-finding
and
really
kind
of
digging
in
and
understanding
getting
to.
What
is
a
steep
slope,
I'm
sure
we'll
talk
about
that
flood
plains.
How
flood
plains
are
mapped
just
to
be
clear
about
what
goes
on
what
you
can
and
cannot
do
currently
based
on
regulations
in
those
situations
and
then
just
come
up
with
some.
You
know
do
some
peer
review
and
make
and
kind
of
get
it
get
a
sense
of
some
good
policies
to
recommend
for
consideration
by
council
and
then
assuming
those
policies
are
adopted.
T
We'll
use
that
as
a
reference
for
rezoning
request
and
again,
these
aren't
code
changes
would
be
policy,
so
we
would
be
making
recommendations
on
cases
based
on
that
policy.
It
would
come
before
you
before
Planning
Commission
and
council,
like
any
zoning
case,
and
you
would
be
the
final
decision-makers
if
there's
any
conditions
on
a
case,
but
at
least
we
have
a
policy
framework
to
go
from.
Thank
you.
T
I
realistically
six
to
eight
months
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
it
is
we
need
to
sure
keep
the
public
involved
as
well
as
the
development
community
so,
and
we
got
to
we've
got
a
pretty
tall
order,
working
on
area
plans
as
well.
So,
quite
frankly,
we're
going
to
be
I,
don't
have
any
planners
to
spare
two
signs
specifically
on
this,
so
actually
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
a
shared
across
departments.
T
M
And
I
believe
the
as
a
co-sponsor
of
this,
my
desire
was
to
be
proactive
in
our
efforts
for
responsible
development
in
relation
to
steep
slopes,
stormwater
runoff
areas
and
also
addressing
remaining
Forsett
lands
to
help
us
understand
better
a
policy
and
a
thinking
I
know
that
there
will
be
input
from
from
everyone.
Obviously,
the
more
input.
The
better
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
a
study
like
this
is
conducted.
Sure
next.
T
T
Then
we
will
I
think
to
me
it's
important
to
again
break
it
into
two
parts
that
we're
very
deliberate.
One
is
what
is
the
problem,
and
part
of
that
will
be,
as
I
mentioned,
what
I
might
take
a
little
driving
tour
with
some
of
the
use
council
members
who've
seen
particular
sites
that
were
your
constituents
have
mentioned,
concerns
I'll,
do
the
same
thing
with
folks
in
the
development
community.
Who've
got
sites
that
I
think
that
are
good
examples
of
Hillside,
maybe
some
not
so
so.
T
Just
try
to
first
understand
the
landscape
so
that
we
can
kind
of
come
a
common
understanding
of
what
the
challenges
are.
Of
course
also.
We
involve
not
only
in
our
department,
we
also
L.
Do
they
have
a
big
role
in
this
to
stormwater
permitting
so
we'll
need
to
work
closely
with
them
to
learn
from
them
so
that
we
have
a
good
base
of
information
about
what
what's
working?
T
What's
not
currently,
then
I
think
I
would
envision
some
kind
of
a
technical
report
being
produced
and
shared
with
you
all
so
before
we
get
into
the
policy
recommendation,
I
think
it's
important
to
first
say:
let's
be
sure,
we
understand
what
the
problem
is
and
the
different
aspects
of
what
we
learn
from
our
research.
Then
I
think
the
second
phase
would
be
exploring
some
policies
by
looking
at
other
cities
and
I'm
big
believer
in
learning
from
other
places,
because
you
know
there's
nothing
like
I
think
trying
to
learn
without
something
new.
T
Without
having
experience
it
can
be
a
little
dangerous,
sometimes
particularly
when
you're
creating
policy.
So
I
think
it's
always
good
to
look
around
to
see
good
examples
in
other
places.
That
seems
to
work
well,
so
we'll
do
a
little
bit
of
peer
review
and
then
we'll
kind
of
come
back
and
present
some
options
that
we
think
would
make
sense
of
staff.
T
Since
this
is
a
policy,
we'll
probably
look
at
all
three
I
will
say
like
site.
Clearing
is
very
limited.
Now
you
can
manage
site
clearing
like
if
you're
doing
a
PUD,
like
sometimes
some
councillors
have
asked
for
conditions
saying
no
clearing
of
land.
You
know
as
some
you
can
certainly
address
it
that
way,
but
if
somebody's
already
got
their
property
zoned
there's
not
a
lot,
we
can
do
to
limit
site
clearing
without
some
other
ordinance
change.
T
M
M
T
T
M
E
M
T
Is
a
request
to
rezone
a
piece
of
land
from
R
1
to
R
a
3
to
accommodate
a
detached
small
lot,
single-family
residential
development
consisting
of
six
parcels
on
the
property?
If
you
can
see
here,
look
at
on
the
slide
is
located
the
north
Chattanooga
community
near
the
at
the
corner
of
May
and
Ziegler
streets
just
to
the
south
about
a
block
or
two
is
Cherokee
Boulevard.
You
can
see
Spears
over
to
the
east
a
couple
a
couple
blocks
away,
give
you
the
location
reference
in
terms
of
land
uses.
T
There
is
a
church
to
the
north
right
across
the
street
on
the
northern.
It's
a
northern
portion
of
in
Ziegler
Street,
but
this
particular
block
mostly
fronts
on
May,
and
you
can
see
the
predominant
character.
Here's
a
getting
you
to
the
site
here,
it's
pretty
clear
flat
here
as
well,
but
you
can
see
the
mostly
single-family
character
in
the
area.
Now
it
does
back
up
if
I
go
back
up
to
this
slide
here.
T
T
Okay,
you
see
it
fringe
is
ranging
from
40
to
45
feet
the
plan
that
we
begin
in
reviewing
this
request,
that
we
looked
at
its
North
Shore
plan
and
it
recommends
urban
single-family
residential
infill.
So
that's
sing
again:
single-family
detached
the
RA
zone,
just
again
distinction
between
the
two
in
the
form
based
code
RA.
Let
you
do
it
to
four
units
per
lot
Rd
with
the
ad?
U
accessory
dwelling
unit,
you
can
do
possibly
two
so
staff
and
reviewing
this
felt
comfortable
with
the
Rd,
which
is
more
similar
in
character
to
the
r1
zoning.
M
F
T
Well,
I
think
that's
the
Planning
Commission
recommendation
I'll
get
to
that
in
a
minute.
Okay,.
T
In
okay,
I'm
late
at
the
store
for
you,
okay,
we'll
get
you
to
that.
To
that
finish
line,
that's
right!
We're
on
a
journey
together
here
at
4:30
in
the
afternoon,
so
we
recommended
you
Rd
because
again
we
know
that
Heights
is
an
issue
in
the
neighborhood,
so
we
recommended
er
D
at
Planning
Commission
there
was
some
opposition
there.
T
Primary
opposition
had
to
do
with
height,
so
not
necessarily
the
RA
zone,
but
the
height,
so
Planning
Commission
recommend
approval
of
e
ra
to
essentially
allow
them
to
do
the
small
watt
detached
single-family
development
but
limited
to
two
stories.
Only
so
that's
how
the
ER
a
shows
up
in
your
packets,
okay,
that
helps.
M
T
Staffs
recommendation
is
er
D
and
the
tube
means
a
number
of
maximum
number
stories.
Planning
Commission
is
recommending
er
a
which
again
allows
you
to
the
four
units
on
it,
but
and
what
I
would
recommend,
as
you
think
about
this
request,
just
note
that
it's
what
will
probably
change
it's,
just
not
that
block
right,
because
you're
you're
changing
the
zoning
on
the
other
partes
block.
T
M
F
F
T
F
F
That
idea,
which
I'm
good
with
yeah
the
community,
is
good
with
and
I
lean
in
favor
of
the
ER
D,
so
that
we
keep
these
residential
detached
homes
throughout
the
rest
of
this
block,
which
is
what
the
community
desires
to
see.
So,
if
I
understood
the
attorney
correct,
the
staff
version
will
say
erd
to
grass,
so
we
could
adopt
the
staff
version
next
week.
Yes,.
M
T
T
Okay,
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
a
property.
Let
me
get
my
notes
correct
from
our
one
residential
to
our
two
residential
zone
in
order
to
bring
to
existing
non-conforming
duplexes,
and
they
go
to
the
right
slide
here
to
compliance.
They
were
already
developed
and
built
as
duplexes.
They
just
lost
a
grandfather
due
to
electricity
being
turned
off
for
a
hundred
days,
and
so
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
rezone
it,
so
they
can
complete
the
renovation
of
these
two
properties
it
it
is
located.
T
Next
to
the
Antioch
Church,
you
see
there
and
the
just
to
the
upper
right
of
this
yellow
of
the
yellow
square.
You
see
they're
the
ones
that
are
redeveloping
this
property
on
plumbing
road
again
to
to
I
think
it's
part
of
their
their
work
as
a
church.
We
look
because
you
know,
of
course
an
RN
is
from
a
planning
side.
We
look
at
the
land
use
side
of
it.
Currently,
if
you
look
at
the
zoning
map,
I
mean
full
house.
You
can
see
the
site,
here's
that
the
existing
buildings
we're
talking
about
other
two
duplexes.
T
You
can
see,
there's
a
drive
in
between
them
that
serves
as
a
connection
to
provide
parking
to
the
rear
of
these
properties.
Again,
you
see
that
the
block
is
predominantly
single-family
in
nature.
There's
a
church,
the
adjacent
Church
you
can
see
in
the
zoning
map.
The
whole
area
is
zoned
r1,
and
so
in
looking
at
this,
we
look
at
again
the
zoning
pattern
right
now.
It's
all
r1.
There
is
no
r2
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
The
plan
I
love
this.
This
is
old.
Go
this
years.the
basically
shows
this
is
being
single-family
residential
for
this
location.
T
So,
based
on
the
zoning
of
the
area
and
the
use
on
the
block
and
the
plan
recommendation
staff
recommended
to
deny
at
Planning
Commission,
let
me
go
up
to
there
was
no
opposition.
There
were
some
represented
from
the
community
that
did
come
to
the
meeting
and
their
main
basis
for
supporting
was
to
make
sure
there'll
be
no
parking
in
the
front
and
I
had
some
concerns
about
cars
being
parked
along
the
street
in
the
front
and
want
to
see
rear
parking.
T
So
after
hearing
staffs
report,
Planning
Commission
found
that
it
used
to
be
compatible
because
you
did
adjacent
church,
nearby,
institutional
use
but
subject
to
the
parking
being
located
to
the
rear
of
the
buildings.
So
staff
recommend
deny
mainly
from
the
president
setting
perspective
Planning
Commission,
recommend
approval,
subjective
parking
mean
located
to
the
rear,
very.
H
The
second
driveway
to
the
little
elf
I
still
don't
know
if
that
goes
to
that
duplex
or
goes
to
the
house
next
door,
so
we're
gonna
find
that
out
and
also
they're
supposed
to
be
so
dividing
the
two
properties,
because
right
now,
there's
just
on
one
plot.
Some
of
this
won't
be
so
dividing
the
two.
That's.
T
H
Know
I
like
to
know
that
before
next
week,
I
put
on
it
and
no
parking
on
the
street
I
did
speak
with
a
young
man.
They
left
a
few
minutes
going
transportation
he's
gonna
be
a
blight
to
see
if
we
can't
put
no
parking
at
that
area,
because
right
now
this
is
very,
very
narrow
street.
It's
like
a
team
model,
Street
right
back
in
a
day.
So,
if
you
put,
if
they
stopped
walking
on
the
side
of
this
duplex,
you
have
to
go
all
the
way
around
and
it's
gonna
cause
traffic
problems.
H
So
that's
another
thing
have
to
find
out
by
next
week
to
see
that's
gonna
be
clear
and
also
you
right.
The
only
reason
why
we
all
can
is
because,
if
we
okay,
it
is
because
the
chainless
hall
did
the
same
similar
thing
with
duplexes.
This
is
right.
Next
to
the
church,
the
church
owns
the
property
and
that's
the
only
reason
why
I'm,
even
considering
it,
because
that
reason
was
that's
a
downzone
area,
so
I
won't
make
sure
that's
on
the
books.
P
M
T
T
These
my
notes
here
wrong
here
we
go,
they
want
to
be
again
to
rezone,
is
from
r1
or
r2
to
accommodate
conversion
of
the
house
to
a
duplex.
The
properties
located
at
3807,
17th
Avenue,
the
site,
as
I
mentioned
before,
is
currently
used
as
a
single-family
dwelling,
you
do
have
mostly
single-family
Lots
in
the
area,
and
this
was
included
in
a
larger
area
that
was
down
zoned
after
the
East
Lake
plan
was
conducted.
T
Here's
the
site
itself.
You
can
see
it's
a
sloping,
slight
site
that
slopes
down
from
17th
Avenue.
You
see
the
home
here
so
the
base.
It's
like
a
vertical
they'll
have
the
top
unit,
be
one
unit
and
then
the
underside
of
your
secondary
unit.
They
will
be
accessing
the
site
from
the
rear,
but
you
can
see
again
it's
mostly
single-family
bungalows
on
this
block.
T
T
T
If
you
recall,
we
used
to
have
a
special
permit
for
duplexes,
which
we
really
only
had
approved
one
time
and
I
think
it
was
in
Highland
Park
and
after
multiple
cases,
where
it
kind
of
went
through
Planning,
Commission
and
gotten
approved
and
didn't
deny
it
at
council.
We
decided
well
if
it's
really
not
working,
let's
remove
it.
So
I
don't
hate
to
bring
up
an
old
topic,
but
again
I
will
say
this
is
another
reflection
of
the
changing
housing
needs
in
the
community.
T
I
think
you're,
gonna,
see
more
of
this
or
folks
are
wanting
to
create
more
housing
options
for
folks.
So
you're
gonna
hear
the
word
aid
to
you
quite
a
bit
which
is
accessory
dwelling
unit.
Other
things
like
this,
where
folks
are
trying
to
convert
homes
into
multiple
units
to
accommodate
Chattanooga's
housing
needs.
So
one
tool
we
had
created
this
is
a
while
ago
was
a
special
permit.
Planning
Commission
did
mention
that
I,
don't
know
councilman
the
Ledford.
You
were
there
as
well.
You.
M
Know
if
you're
not
jump
in
insured?
Okay,
if
I
remember
the
case
correctly,
this
actually
was
I,
guess
grandfathered
in
so
to
speak,
and
some
renovations
had
been
done
to
make
this
a
better
looking
property
and
bring
it
up
to
standards
and
I
believe
they
just
simply
lost
it
because
they
fell
out
of
utilities.
That
was
the
other
ones.
That
was
the
other
one.
Yes,.
T
M
M
One
of
the
comments
I,
remember
John.
If
I'm
a
Planning
Commission
was
the
the
need
for
creating
affordable
housing,
that's
options
for
families
and
and
that
that
was
a
major
I'll
just
leave
it
at.
That
was
a
major
topic.
Conversation
topic.
Yet
I
do
have
some
lights.
If
you,
if
you're
okay,
to
take
questions
very
good.
C
Please
so
I
want
to
pick
up
on
what
John
said.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
duplexes
and
our
ones,
and
all
of
that
and
what
happened
is
there
were
a
number
of
areas
that
were
down
zoned
or
trying
to
be
protected
from
actually
protecting
property
owners
that
had
bought
in
our
one
and
so
Russell's,
not
here
right
now,
but
what
we,
what
we
did
with
several
things?
C
First
of
all,
if
you
do
this,
if
we
do
this
right
or
wrong
its
spot
zoning
all
right
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
had
a
lot
of
input
on
and
feedback
from
the
whole
community
was
how
do
we
know
when
we
buy
in
certain
areas
that
our
property
is
protected?
If
we
choose
to
by
an
hour
one
area,
particularly
in
the
older
areas
where
people
are
redoing
homes
and
stuff
and
and
rehabbing,
there
seems
to
be
no
protection
for
the
r-1,
we're
in
turn
doing
spot
zoning.
C
C
C
Unfortunately,
all
landlords
don't
act
and
I'm
not
talking
about
this
case
I,
don't
know
these
people,
sometimes
landlords,
don't
act
in
the
best
interest
and
so
affordable
housing
is
meant
to
be
or
turned
into
substandard
housing
and
what
happens
to
a
neighborhood
then,
because
people,
people's
homes
are
the
biggest
investment
they're
going
to
make
in
many
cases,
particularly
people
that
are
finally
making
it
coming
up
and
buying
homes
in
these
other
areas,
and
so
I
think
we
have,
we
had
to
do
more
thinking
than
just
should
it
be.
Should
we
do
this?
Car
belong.
A
A
T
Clearly,
you
got
a
look
at
hole,
number
factors
right:
when
is
the
plan?
Zoning
I
guess
particularly
there's
a
lot
actually
of
several
cases.
This
isn't
a
several
work,
because
this
is
fall
right
after
the
Antioch
case
and
I
think
the
idea
of,
if
you're,
trying
to
encourage
more
housing
diversity.
What's
the
tool
to
do
that,
one
tool
not
saying
is
the
only
and
right
tool
are
to
let
you'd
at
least
do
two
units
on
a
I
think
they
also
factored
in
it.
There's
no
opposition,
like
that.
T
M
By
any
means,
but
part
of
the
conversation
is
that
is
the
the
growing
need
and
options
the
Planning
Commission
I
can
I
can
think
accurately
is,
is
looking
at
r2
as
a
tool
to
address
the
needs
that
we're
all
concerned
about
in
that
regard.
So
and
again,
that's
just
recanting
some
conversation.
Okay,.
A
Well,
two
things:
if
I
could
piggyback
councilperson
bird's
comments,
I,
don't
understand
where
the
Planning
Commission
gets
off.
This
is
gonna,
be
fun
not
being
chair
next
year,
I,
don't
understand
where
the
Planning
Commission
gets
off,
deciding
that
we
need
some
housing
options
in
a
neighborhood
that
has
purposely
decided.
They
don't
want
those
options.
I,
don't
understand
that
too.
If
you
look
at
the
lot,
obviously
most
of
the
lots
are
rounded
or
vacant
lot.
So
what
happens
to
the
300
foot
notification?
Who
actually
got
those
notifications
to
drum
up
some
opposition?
A
N
Then
that's
a
point
well
taken,
because
we
got
to
look
at
these
also
not
just
district
7,
but
the
ramification
that
they
have
in
other
areas.
So
I
really
appreciate
your
comments.
This
particular
location
is
in
a
area
not
well
populated,
and
it
could
set
an
undue
standard
that
we
don't
want
to
have
to
follow.
A
point
and
I
see
this
as
not
being
favorable
for
long
term
circumstances.
N
N
M
T
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
it
actually
there's
two
of
them
they
go
together.
This
is
in
the
Jefferson
Heights
community
to
resume
from
manufacturing
when
manufacturing
zone,
2,
Urd
urban,
residential
detached
first
one,
for
this
particular
item
is
to
the
requesting
that
zoning
to
develop
for
single-family
detached
dwellings
on
I,
currently
in
one's
own
property.
Again,
you
are
d-zone
to
be
able
to
do
that.
These
were
not
included
originally
in
the
form
based
code
study
because
they
were
recently
owned
by
the
railroad
at
the
time.
N
T
T
Here
you
can
see
some
current
houses
being
developed
across
the
street
detached
small
lot.
As
looking
for
the
up
Madison
Street
across
the
park,
let
me
show
you
the
site
plan.
You
can
see
here
they're
showing
the
four
parcels
that
would
be
subdivided
to
accommodate
the
Rd
development
staff
and,
looking
at
this
again,
we
looked
at
the
zoning
pattern.
T
That
was
our
recommendation
at
Planning
Commission
there
was
opposition
and
the
concerns
primarily
had
to
do
with
flooding.
Also
just
wanna
make
sure
they're
minimizing
number
of
curb
cuts
coming
out
onto
the
street,
so
just
note
that
our
zone
m1
now
so
this
would
be
actually
a
down
zone
to
a
residential
type
zone.
T
So
Planning
Commission
concurred
with
staffs
recommendation
to
approve
our
a3
now
note
that
as
far
as
flooding
and
I've
got
a
douse
help
me
if
I
must
say
something
here,
but
you
know
they
have
to
when
they
do
through
the
permitting
process
they
have
to
demonstrate.
There
would
be
no
off-site
flood
water
impacts
from
that
development.
Is
that
correct.
E
E
T
T
Second
case
again
is
right
next
door.
This
is
on
Madison.
Street
is
for
one
single
family
dwelling,
it's
a
wedge
property
triangle:
property.
Currently,
zoned
m1,
you
can
see
already
got
some
houses
to
the
south
of
this
property.
They're
wanting
to
go
to
our
d2
to
accommodate
one
single-family
dwelling
staff
recommendation.
T
N
T
This
is
a
request
to
resume.
This
is
that
if
you
know
central
and
Main
Street,
you
see
kind
of
just
the
left
hand
on
the
side
of
the
screen.
This
is
in
that
area.
This
is
to
request
to
rezone.
A
piece
of
property
is
currently
vacant
from
r3
this
crime,
as
an
r32
RTZ
to
accommodate
for
detached
single-family
dwellings,
as
I
mentioned
before
the
site
is
currently
vacant
me
here,
you
can
see
a
picture
of
the
site.
There
is
this
thing:
family
dwelling
just
to
the
west
of
the
site
across
the
street.
T
Again
the
zoning
is
r3.
You
do
have
some
UGC
zoning
to
the
south
and
I
believe
that
the
closest
RTZ
is
about
a
little
more
than
half
mile
away
on
1608
13th
Street,
but
RT
Z
is
quite
frequently
used.
If
somebody
wants
to
do
small
watt
detached
single-family
residential
development,
so
they're
requesting
that
zone
to
accommodate
those
for
single-family
dwellings,
let
me
show
you
the
site
plan.
T
Now
the
density
residential
is
a
little
more
than
what's
currently
in
the
area,
but
it's
a
less
intense
that
you
would
have
in
an
r3
type
development.
So
we
recommended
approval.
There
was
opposition
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
that
I
think
the
main
concern
was
just
opportunity
to
meet
with
the
applicant
the
neighbor
next
to
a
request:
a
deferral
to
have
time
to
meet
with
the
applicant.
T
The
applicant
responded
they've
been
trying
to
reach
the
the
neighbor
and
had
had
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
connect,
says
Planning
Commission
felt
that
there's
a
probably
good
opportunity
for
them
to
meet
between
Planning
Commission
and
City
Council
and
giving
us
a
down
zoning.
They
recommend
they
concur
with
staffs
recommendation
to
approve
very.
M
M
T
T
Right,
the
last
one
is
a:
is
a
zoning
ordinance
text
change
not
gonna,
try
to
explain
all
the
slide,
but
essentially
currently
RTZ
when
we
first
created
the
zone
it
was
predominantly
applied
in
suburban
areas
is
where
most
of
your
town
hounds
are
being
developed,
and
so
the
concern
was
not
having
multiple
townhouses
with
with
driveways
fronting
along
a
public
street.
So
we
had
this
40
30
foot
look
my
notes
here,
I
believe
was
a
originally.
It
was
a
30-foot
setback.
T
Actually,
actually
it
was
for
you
well
now
we're
starting
to
see
and
a
good
thing
is
actually
town
house
is
putting
parking
in
the
rear,
which
is
something
we
want
to
encourage,
but
if
they're
putting
parking
in
the
rear,
there's
no
need
to
have
that
deeper
set
back.
So
this
zoning
text,
amendment
change,
allows
them
to
have
the
same
setback
a
single
family
of
25
feet
as
long
as
the
parking
is
in
the
rear.
T
T
This
is
there's
two.
These
there's
two
items
that
relate
together,
one
is
to
abandon
a
pod.
The
other
is
to
basically
create
a
new
pod
for
the
same
location.
The
homeowners
association
for
windward
cove,
applied
to
our
PA
to
basically
abandon
their
PUD
and
amend
it
by
adding
on
a
me
show
you.
The
here
is
the
current
PUD
boundary
you
see
there
outlined
in
a
dashed
blue
line.
They
would
add,
if
you
can't
see
that
little
finger
off
of
this.
Let
me
see
if
I
get
a
better
illustration
here.
Use.
T
We
had
a
bunch
today,
John
missed
out.
Well,
you
see
so
that
little
finger
coming
off
here.
You
probably
can't
see
what
I'm
pointing.
If
you
see
that
kind
of
looks
like
a
long,
rectilinear
kind
of
heavily
long
line.
They
would
be
adding
that
as
a
community
lot.
Council
Smith's
can
tell
you
about
that.
He
worked
long
and
hard
to
work
with
the
community
to
get
that
added
to
the
PUD.
There
has
been
some
communication
issues
with
between
the
HOA
and
the
residents.
We
were
not
sure
if
we
could
take
the
case.
T
The
attorney
can
tell
us.
We
had
him
confirm
that
there
was
actually
a
valid
meeting
and
notification.
We
had
enough
basis
to
to
take
an
application,
so
we
you
know
we
can't
get
into
what
communication
did
or
did
not
happen
between
the
residents
and
the
HOA.
We
just
look.
We
have
to
look
at
the
application
on
its
own
merits,
so
staff
recommended
approval,
since
it
was
adding
that
community
lot
adding
more
community
space.
There
was
no
opposition,
I
still
tried.
There
was
opposition.
My.
E
R
T
It
was
there
again
and
opposition
had
to
do
with
whether
or
not
the
board
had
the
authority
to
take
this
action,
and
we
know
that
we
basically
information.
We
had
a
staff
and
upon
advice
of
our
city
attorney,
we
we
would
need
to
process
the
application.
So
we
did.
We
recommended
approval.
Planning
Commission
concurred
with
staffs
finding
to
approve
the
PUD,
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
John.
M
M
E
U
T
T
27:22
so3,
seven
windward,
Cove,
homeowners
association,
special
acceptance,
permanent
a
resolution
authorizing
a
special
exceptions,
permit
for
a
residential
Planned
Unit
development
for
properties
located
the
4400
block
of
Webb
Road
and
a
4200
block
through
the
4500
blocks
of
sailmaker
circle
circle.
Okay,.
U
All
right
can
you
go
back
to
where
you
actually
had
the
blue
outline
just
for
one?
Second,
please,
okay,
so
when
you
say
adding
the
community
lot,
we're
not
actually
adding
it,
meaning
creating
it
we're
just
including
it
into
the
existing
PUD.
Yes,
okay,
so
we're
we're
eliminating
while
imitating
the
existing
PUD
we're
creating
a
new
one,
and
the
new
PUD
includes
what
it
already
exists
as
community
space.
That's.
T
U
U
T
T
U
So
here's
what
I
would
like
to
see
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
abandoning
the
PUD
I.
Don't
have
an
issue
with
submitting
a
new
PUD
I
have
an
issue
with
extending
lock
22
and
taking
up
that
other
triangle
of
what
is
already
community
space.
So
I
would
like
to
see
an
alternate
version
that
abandons
a
PUD,
extends
the
existing
PUD
to
take
in
the
community
space,
but
leaves
lot
22
at
its
current
size
and
leaves
lot
44
at
its
current
size.
Understood
all
right.
Thank
you.
Nothing.
Further,
sir
Thank.
M
T
You
were
provided,
Eric
Myers
did
a
great
job
kind
of
give
you
a
pretty
lengthy
overview
of
the
plan.
I
do
have
some
slides.
It
just
remind
you
the
scope
of
the
plan,
but
we
had
a
as
he
indicated
to
get
his
presentation.
We
already
had
our
community
meeting
at
that
point
at
the
DRC
and
that
one
sees
a
lot
of
positive
favorable
feedback.
Answering
some
questions
right.
T
The
biggest
confusion
dealt
with
what
this
map
means,
which
is
an
illustrative
plan
versus
the
framework
in
terms
of
policy
which
we
are
adopting,
is
the
framework
of
the
illustrative
plan
just
shows
one
potential
of
probably
a
hundred
different
outcomes.
This
is
just
a
visualization
tool.
To
tells
you
what
this
framework
plan
could
produce
over
time
said.
I
think
that
was
the
biggest
thing
is
helping
the
public
understand
the
difference
between
the
two
Planning
Commission
recommended
approval
staff.
T
I
E
U
T
U
M
N
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
today's
economic
and
Community
Development
Committee.
Thank
you.
What
we're
going
to
do?
We
have
three
topics
of
discussion:
I
want
to
move
first
to
the
ml,
King
Boulevard
construction
mitigation
program
and
then
to
the
tournament
matching
grants
so
team.
You
got
the
floor.
N
You
know
what
hold
on
you
got
a
time
frame.
You
have
to
deal
with
I'm
a
reasonable
man.
If
you
don't
man,
let's
just
do
the
south
brought
that
there
would
be
an
excellent
follow-up
to
what
chairman
let
for
just
finished
with
and
then
we're
ease
on
and
to
close
out
with
the
really
good
stuff.
Okay,
my.
N
T
So
again,
I
I
think
you
know
we
were
excited
about
again.
The
plan
has
several
key
concepts
that
will
hopefully
guide
the
future
redevelopment
of
that
area.
You
know
there
is
the
potential
for
a
rezoning
study
down
the
road.
We
got
some
homework
to
do
before
we
move
that
forward.
So
we're
gonna
have
some
stakeholder
meetings
to
see
if
folks
are
ready
to
move
to
take
that
next
step,
that's
part
of
our
work
and
as
I
understand
it.
T
You
know
some
of
the
implementation
recommendations
in
the
plan
looking
at
different
tools
to
help
facilitate
the
redevelopment
of
that
area,
I'm
sure
we'll
be
exploring
those
with
different
departments
that
have
different
roles
to
play
in
that
kind
of
there's,
a
lot
of
infrastructure
related
items
associated
with
that.
So
really
the
fun
work
starts
now,
and
so
we
appreciate
again
councilman
Ogilvie
your
support
and
champion
the
plan.
It's
been
really
a
team
effort
again.
I'm
also
come
in
and
clear.
T
N
Well,
I
just
want
to
mimic
what
you
just
said
that
this
this
is
a
plan
that
has
been
implemented
by
a
total
community
effort.
So
this
is
not
anything
other
than
the
community
came
up
with
it's
something
that
has
been
committed.
That's
not
going
to
sit
on
the
Shelf
once
to
prove
we're
going
to
start
the
process
to
make
sure
things
happen
within
the
constraints
of
our
authority.
N
P
All
right,
thank
you.
So
let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
construction
mitigation,
so
in
our
office
of
economic
development,
we
have
received
word
from
some
of
our
businesses
in
the
MLK
corridor,
about
the
need
for
to
take
on
some
mitigation
steps
and
having
a
little
bit
of
trouble
with
the
clicker
here.
P
Okay,
so
as
an
overview.
What
we
would
like
to
do
from
the
Office
of
Economic
Development
is
to
transfer
a
hundred
and
nineteen
thousand
dollars
that
we
have
currently
in
an
economic
development
fund
over
to
the
Industrial
Development
Board,
for
the
support
of
small
business
programs,
namely
a
construction
mitigation
program
for
businesses
that
are
located
in
the
MLK
court
in
the
MLK
Boulevard
corridor.
P
Although
there's
a
long
term
economic
benefit
of
improving
public
infrastructure
like
doing
the
fixing
MLK
Boulevard
right
there
at
Miller
Park
and
then
also
doing
the
repaving
work
that
we've
currently
been
working
on
for
the
past
30
days
on
MLK
Boulevard.
Obviously
there
is
an
economic
impact
that
comes
along
with
that
reducing
the
roads,
the
reducing
MLK
Boulevard.
The
doing
the
lane
right
sizing
obviously
makes
it
more
pedestrian
friendly,
and
it
has
a
that,
of
course,
makes
it
more
friendlier
for
people
to
frequent
the
businesses
along
MLK
Boulevard.
P
But
in
the
short
term,
though,
during
these
construction
projects,
sometimes
there
can
be
a
negative
impact
on
the
businesses
that
are
affected
just
in
terms
of
because
of
all
of
the
construction
and
the
street
closures.
A
lot
of
your
normal
shoppers
or
the
normal
people
who
would
frequent
the
businesses
don't
have
access
to
the
businesses
or
choose
not
to
frequent
the
businesses
because
they
don't
want
to
deal
with
the
inconvenience
of
navigating
the
construction.
P
So,
to
give
a
little
background,
the
only
time
that
the
the
Burke
administration
has
previously
engaged
in
construction
mitigation
was
a
couple
of
years
ago
when
we
did
mitigation
services
for
businesses
in
the
Wilcox
corridor,
and
that
was
because
the
Wilcox
tunnel
was
closed
for
approximately
six
months,
and
so
as
a
result
of
that.
During
that
process,
we
heard
from
small
businesses
on
both
sides
of
the
tunnel
about
the
impact
that
the
tunnel
improvements
were
having
on
their
businesses,
and
so
they,
you
know,
reached
out
to
the
city
and
said
you
know,
hey.
P
Is
there
anything
that
the
city
could
kind
of
do
to
mitigate
our
lots
of
our
loss
of
traffic
or
loss
of
revenue
during
these
big
construction
times?
And
so
after
that
and
in
response
to
that
and
during
that
process,
city
staff
began
to
explore
and
to
investigate
mitigation
projects
and
mitigation
programs
across
the
country.
And
so
we
decided
to
develop
a
program
that
would
provide
for
mitigation
services
in
the
event
that
there
were
businesses
that
were
impacted
by
long
construction
projects
resulting
in
street
closures.
P
But
it's
a
way
for
the
city
to
let
businesses
know,
particularly
small
businesses,
know
that
we
feel
their
pain
and
that
we're
understanding
of
the
challenges
that
they
face
during
those
tough
times
because
often
times
for
a
small
business.
These
construction
mitigation
times
when
there's
severe
construction
can
really
impact
the
bottom
line
of
a
small
business.
So
our
mitigation
program
allowed
the
it
currently
allows
for
grant
of
up
to
$1,000
for
affected
small
business,
and
we
define
a
small
business
as
a
business
that
has
a
hundred
employees
or
less
so.
P
These
programs
are
not
meant,
for
you,
know,
large
businesses
like
large
large
large
corporate
businesses,
but
they
are
definitely
tailored
to
to
our
small
businesses
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
in
addition
to
the
$1,000
grant
that
a
business
would
be
eligible
for,
we
also
can
do
some
increased
outreach
at
the
neighborhood.
That
means
going
and
doing
business
to
business
door-to-door
canvassing
to
let
businesses
know
about
these
about
the
1,000
dollar
grant.
It
means
calling
the
businesses
it
means,
having
meetings
to
take
business
owners
through
the
process
of
how
to
apply
for
the
grant.
P
P
That
would
provide
information
about
detours
and
so
again,
many
of
the
merchants
in
the
email
cable
of
our
corridor
asked
the
city
to
consider
implementing
a
mitigation
program.
This
started
when
MLK
Boulevard
was
actually
closed
during
the
Miller
Park
construction.
So
this
actually
started
when
when
they,
when
another
MLK
Boulevard
was
closed
between
Market
Street
and
Georgia
Avenue
as
part
of
that
Miller
Park
construction.
That
of
course,
that
construction
period
lasted
120
days.
P
These
are
the
program
requirements
for
a
receipt
of
the
grant,
its
completion
and
submission
of
the
written
application,
which
is
online,
along
with
the
submission
of
the
required
attachments
that
includes
the
city
of
Atchison,
II
of
chating,
a
business
license.
The
Hamilton
County
business
license
estate
certificate
of
existence.
P
If
available,
all
businesses
don't
have
that
a
completed
IRS
form
w-9
and
a
signed
statement
detailing
the
negative
impact
of
the
construction
on
the
business
and
the
reason
going
back
to
a
sort
of
keeping
in
line
with
what
was
required
when
we
did
the
Wilcox
mitigation,
we
I
think
in
the
original
when
the
the
the
world
cost
mitigation
originally
happened.
There
were
staff
who
also
asked
business
owners
to
submit
proof
in
terms
of
receipts
that
could
sort
of
our
show
a
loss
from
one
time
period
to
another.
P
But
what
we
found
during
that
Wilcox
program
program
was
that
there
were
a
lot
of
business
owners
that
simply
didn't
retain
the
records
to
show
that,
and
so
in
an
effort
to
to
offer
assistance
to
those
business
owners
who
may
not
have
been
tech
savvy
or
organized
enough
to
keep
those
records.
We
asked
for
a
written
statement
that
would
be
signed
by
each
business
owner
that
basically
detailed
what
the
impact
was
during
the
construction
phase
and
then
so.
P
We
have
a
mitigation
map,
that's
available
online
and
then,
of
course
you
must
be
a
for-profit
business
with
a
hundred
or
fewer
employees
and
then,
in
addition
to
this
well,
this
just
details
the
thousand
dollar
grant
that
is
eligible
to
each
business
and
then
so.
Basically,
what
we're
asking
is
that
the
City
Council
allow
us
to
use
the
hundred
and
nineteen
thousand
dollars.
P
It's
currently
in
an
economic
development
account
allow
us
to
transfer
that
over
to
the
Industrial
Development
Board
and
then
the
Industrial
Development
Board
would
go
through
the
process
of
awarding
grants
to
businesses
who
apply.
We
anticipate
that
there
will
be
somewhere
between
20
about
20
to
21
businesses
that
will
apply
for
some
sort
of
mitigation,
and
so
we
have
already
opened
that
application
process
up
and
we've
already
begun
to
see
applications
come
in.
P
A
couple
years
ago
there
was
a
business
fair
that
was
organized
by
one
of
the
business
owners
in
the
wilcox
area,
where
there
was
actually
sort
of
a
fair
or
a
festival
that
encouraged
people
to
come,
spend
money
at
the
businesses
in
the
wilcox
Boulevard
corridor.
Businesses
could
get
help
with
paid
advertising.
Of
course,
you
know
paid
advertising,
whether
it's
print
radio
internet,
if
we
did
any
paid
advertising
that
we
do
we're
gonna
do
for
the
businesses
as
a
collective.
So
we
would
be
doing
app.
P
We
would
be
helping
with
the
businesses
as
a
collective
of
the
nlk
court
or
any
business
that
wanted
say
to
spend
$1000
on
Facebook
advertising.
For
example,
we
would
simply
do
a
1,000
dollar
grant
to
the
business
and
then,
if
they
wanted
to
use
that
for
their
own
advertising,
they
could
and
then,
in
addition,
we've
already
been
doing
parking
assistance
see.
That's
been
great
about
getting
signs
out
around
the
boulevard
to
allow
for
increased
signage
and
parking
assistance.
P
E
N
P
M
P
The
reason
for
that
is
because
we
do
want
businesses
to
understand
that
construction
is
a
very
real
part
of
the
city's
life
and
so
and
the
the
construction
and
the
improvements
that
we
do
in
public
infrastructure.
Those
improvements
are
going
to
have
a
benefit
for
the
businesses,
so
we
don't
want
to
get
every
business
in
the
habit
of
expecting
a
mitigation
or
thousand
dollar
check.
Every
time
we
do
construction,
Roger.
M
P
We
knew
we
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
to
get
the
website
up
and
going
because
we
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
get
application
because
it
takes
a
while
for
a
business
owner
to
stop
doing
their
daily
dude
their
daily
duties
at
the
business
and
then
to
sit
down
or
to
step
away
from
their
work
to
fill
out
an
application.
And
so
our
effort
in
going
ahead
and
opening
up
the
application
process
was
in
no
way
to
subvert
the
City
Council
process.
P
M
P
What
was
what
we
did
before
was
during
the
Wilcox
program,
people
simply
typed
up
a
statement
and
they
signed
the
personal
statement
and
they
turned
that
in.
That
was
the
only
thing
that
was
required
during
the
Wilcox
phase.
Now
I
will
say
that
the
Wilcox
mitigation
program
predated
my
time
and
sherita's
time
with
the
city,
but
that
was
the
bar
that
was
set,
and
so
I
am,
I
think,
Sherita
and
I
are
open
to
including
and
we're
incorporating
any
more
required
documentation
that
the
City
Council
would
recommend.
Okay.
P
P
A
hundred
and
nineteen,
so
we
think
that
they're
gonna
be
19
in
in
the
MLK
corridor,
based
on
the
outreach
that
we've
done.
However,
we
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
move
that
money
to
the
IDB
for
any
future
construction
mitigation
efforts
that
we
may
have
down
the
road.
So
this
is
not
an
effort,
so
you
you
to
do
119
businesses
right
now
we're
just
trying
to
get
money
over
to
the
IDB
in
the
event
that
there's
another
construction
mitigation
project
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
come
to
the
to
the
led.
P
This
length
correct,
and
that
way
we
wouldn't
have
to
by
moving
the
119,000,
which
is
well
over
what
we
need
for
em.
Okay,
we
could
go
ahead
and
have
money
set
aside
for
district
for
businesses
in
the
event
that
the
district
forward
that
the
construction
mitigation
in
district
4
meets
these
criteria
and.
M
P
Is
correct
so
again,
I
think
sure,
EDA
and
I
were
looking
down
the
road
and
thinking,
let's
get
the
money.
Let's
have
a
pool
of
money
that
we
can
set
aside
for
mitigation
so
that
in
the
future,
if
we
have
other
mitigation
efforts
that
come
up
because
of
construction,
because
there's
been
a
lot
of
construction
lately,
then
we
can.
We
can
be
prepared
to
deploy
that
money
very
quickly
and.
M
P
N
P
Our
current
mitigation
map
defines
the
MLK
corridor
as
MLK
Boulevard
from
US
Highway
27
to
Central
Avenue,
and
then
it
also
includes
part
of
Patton
Parkway
parts
of
Georgia,
Avenue
and
parts
of
the
intersection
streets
that
intersect
with
MLK
between
highway,
27
and
and
Central
Avenue.
So
it's
going
to
it
would
include
like
parts
of
Lindsay
Street
parts
of
Houston
Street
parts
of
Douglas
Street
parts
of
University
Street.
Those
would
all
be
sort
of
in
the
corridor.
So,
for
example,
bitter
alibi
would
be
a
business
that
has
so.
F
F
P
F
F
P
P
Like
we
heard
from
businesses
all
the
way
down
all
the
way
down
and
okay,
almost
a
central
that,
yes,
they
were
feeling
the
effects
of
the
blow
of
the
that
stretch
of
em.
Okay
being
closed
now,
I
I
think
that's
a
fair
question.
I
can't
so
scientifically
prove
whether
they
did
or
didn't.
But
that's
what
we
were
hearing
from
the
MLK
merchants.
E
E
C
C
P
E
C
C
P
C
P
P
Yet
that's
correct,
and
so
we
said
well,
let's
go
ahead
and
move
this
over
to
the
Industrial
Development
Board,
so
that
we
can
go
ahead
and
start
doing
the
construction
mitigation
grants
and
then
we'll
have
enough
for
the
in
okay
businesses.
And
then,
if
we
have
other
construction
projects
like
in
district
4,
for
example,
then
we'll
already
have
enough
money
in
the
pool
to
help
them
as
well.
E
N
E
N
E
N
S
Of
all
germane,
Sarita
I,
just
think
not
just
for
district
eight
in
in
okay,
is
amazing
that
you
all
are
looking
at
these
small
businesses
and
trying
to
give
him
some
relief.
When
Miller
Park
did
shut
down.
I
was
talking
to
the
people
at
the
camp
house
and
whereas
people
would
come
through
Miller
Park
and
come
down
MLK
making
their
way
towards
Central.
They
tend
to
go
around
or
hit
the
freeway
instead
of
coming
that
way,
so
they
would
stop
at
Starbucks.
S
E
S
Kind
of
understand
why
the
website
was
opened
up
early,
because
now,
if
this
money
is
approved,
it
will
move
a
little
faster
to
get
things
done.
It's
not
millions
of
dollars.
It
is
a
thousand
dollars
right
for
the
business
and
you'll
be
surprised
at
what
a
thousand
dollars
can
do
to
help
a
small
business
just
make
ends
meet
and
get
over
those
humps.
So
I'm
really
proud
of
you
guys.
Thank
you.
S
V
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
both
that
and
Councilwoman
burs
when
it
comes
to
sort
of
the
forum
issue,
I
think
in
light
of
sort
of
how
the
program
was
rolled
out
and
and
the
announcement
was
made,
including
this
particular
you
know-
mitigation
grant
component.
We
have
since
reached
out
to
both
Public
Works
and
transportation,
to
ask
them
to
give
us
their
planogram
for
future
projects
and
the
associated
timeline,
so
that
we
know
ahead
of
time
because
I
think
it
hit
us
just
as
it
hit
everyone
else.
It
was
sort
of.
Did
we
not
knew?
V
Did
we
not
know
we
were
doing
this
project
and-
and
when
did
we
know
it,
and
and
what
was
the
planning
part
and
at
what
point
should
economic
development
had
been
made
that
that
you
know
mitigation
grants
we're
not
programmed
on
the
public
work
side
or
not
programmed
on
the
CDOT
side
and
so
I
think
moving
forward?
We
are
asking
those
questions
internally,
all
the
departments
so
that
we
know
okay
and
six
months
as
a
construction
project
coming
up.
What
does
that
look
like?
How
long
will
that
take
what
departments
will
be
involved?
V
Is
there
is
it
on
a
business
corridor?
What's
the
impact
the
length
of
time
all
those
kinds
of
things
and
then
backing
up
and
saying?
Okay,
have
we
planned
mitigation
grants
for
it
and
if
so,
what's
our
timeline
for
rolling
that
out,
so
that
again
we're
all
aware
and
we're
not
coming
at
the
last
minute
and
making
these
requests
so
I
appreciate
the
concern
from
both
of
you,
because
we
have
heard
it
and
we've
asked
those
same
questions
internally
and
we're
trying
to
mitigate
that
moving
forward
so
that
we're
not
in
this
position
again.
S
F
Doubt-
and
that
was
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
ask-
I
mean
you
know,
I
was
going
to
ask:
did
we
not
know
that
this
project
was
going
to
take
longer
than
90
days
to
complete,
which
means,
if
we
knew
we
did
it
for
Wilcox
tunnel,
then
we're
probably
going
to
do
it
for
this
project
and
maybe
do
it
for
another
project
that
is
going
to
be
longer
than
90
days.
So
I
think
there's
a
process
that
we
could
start
with.
F
City
Council
won
by
maybe
trying
to
just
approve
a
mitigation
map
and
then
deciding
okay,
we're
going
to
give
$1,000
and
then,
and
then
at
least.
If
we
approve
a
mitigation
map,
then
we
can
wait
for
the
applications
to
come
in
and
then
approve
the
amount
of
money
that
we
need
to
move
rather
than
just
I.
Don't
know
if
willy
nilly
is
the
right
word
just
putting
some
money
into
it.
F
E
F
Howdy
buddy
thank
you
lost
my
word.
Rather
than
just
putting
a
sum
of
money
in
the
IDB
we're
actually
we've
already
approved
the
process,
then
then
we
determine
how
much
money
we
need
to
move
as
opposed
to
just
putting
an
amount
there
that
that
we're
just
dumping
money
into
which
I
would
rather
do
that
as
to
counter
the
process
that
we're
doing
here.
P
E
F
P
F
S
And
will
there
be
a
like
say
even
after
this
right
here,
my
understanding
I'm?
What
I'm
hearing
now
is
that
say
the
the
business
that
are
suffering
from
some
type
of
hardship
right
now,
because
of
what
was
going
on
with
the
construction
or
whatever
the
case,
they
can
then
apply
for
a
grant
up
to
a
thousand
dollars
from
the
city
to
help
them
withstand
the
punch
of
the
construction
that
went
on
correct
and
in
the
process
of
that
right
now,
they're
waiting
on,
like
you
said
no
bitter
at
about
know,
Jesus
trust,
sausage
I
know.
E
S
That's
why
you
put
it
out
there
now
and
to
go
ahead
and
apply
for
this
to
put
this
money
aside
in
the
IDB
correct
now,
one
of
my
other
concerns
so
say
this
right
here
happens
and
you
pay
out
$19,000
and
that
will
create
somewhat
of
a
road
map
to
say.
Okay,
these
many
businesses
were
affected
outside
of
the
map
that
you
said
that
you
have,
that
shows
the
corridors
or
other
businesses,
then
councilman
Lefferts
district.
They
apply
and
say
it's
15
businesses
or
20
businesses.
S
So
now
we
had
thirty-nine
thousand
dollars
and
they
apply
for
it.
That
money
starts
to
do
one
little
way.
So
at
some
time,
in
budgeting
or
sometime
in
the
near
future,
with
the
city
be,
will
we
be
looking
at
saying,
hey?
We
need
to
start
supplementing
or
putting
something
aside
to
say
that
hey
doing
budgeting
or
whatever
time,
to
take
care
of
the
citizens
of
Chattanooga
the
business
owners
who
have
invested
in
the
city
to
say,
hey,
we
are
concerned
about
your
business.
S
E
V
Or
Public
Works,
and
so,
for
instance,
if
it
were
a
T
dot
project,
they
would
build
in
mitigation
grants
into
their
funding.
Tdot
TDOT
would
I,
don't
know
the
history
of
C
dot
projects,
but
but
historically
you
know
where
I
come
from.
You
know.
If
it
is,
you
know
a
local
Department
of
Transportation
project.
They
would
also
build
that
into
their
budget,
but
again
it's
based
on
the
parameters
that
that
the
council
set
so
that
if
it's
a
project,
that's
over
ninety
days,
then,
along
with
that,
depending
on
the
corridor,
the
map
would
be
identified.
V
And
then
you
know,
target
mitigation.
Grant
funds
would
be
set
aside
for
that,
and
sometimes
the
funds
not
for
businesses.
Sometimes
the
funds
are,
you
know,
there's
mitigation
and
we're
doing
$5,000
dollars
for
billboards
or
signage
or
advertising
or
or
wayfinding
signs,
because
you
know
you've
got
to
change
the
route.
I
mean
it's
not
always
just
for
a
particular
company,
that's
or
a
small
business.
That's
had
some
impact,
sometimes
it's
for
all
of
those
other
things.
But
again
do
you
have
different
infrastructure
projects.
S
V
S
V
C
V
C
C
So
so,
if
I'm
hearing
correctly
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
that
I'm
ready
to
transfer
a
hundred
and
nineteen
thousand
they're
almost
like
a
the
request
and
then
fund
the
requests.
Would
you
all
will
have
vetted
very
well.
I
think
you've
got
a
great
great
idea
there.
The
other
thing
is
when
there
are
road
changes
or
detours
doesn't
TDOT.
Do
this
already
I
mean
see
dot
I
mean
what's
the
extra
money
for
the
signage
and
all
of
that.
P
P
E
P
L
I
V
V
So
our
PA
is
in
the
process
of
completing
the
area.
Three
plan.
I
know
the
Advisory
Committee
has
been
pulled
together.
They've
had
their
first
meeting,
the
the
former
Tubman
home
site
falls
within
that
area.
Three
plan
at
some
point
down.
The
road
we'd
recognize
that
once
the
plan
comes
out
and
there
will
be
recommendations
for
either
existing
zoning
rezoning
up
zoning
down
zoning,
we
don't
know
that
yet
there's
a
community
input
piece,
that's
part
of
that,
and
so
based
on
the
area
plan
that's
rolled
out
and
the
community
input.
V
We
know
that
we
will
start
to
market
the
Tubman
site,
and
with
that
in
mind,
we
did
reach
out
to
the
chamber
to
say
if
there
any
opportunities
for
you
guys
to
uncover
any
site
development
grants
that
would
do
all
the
site
studies
necessary
for
us
to
start
the
marketing
and
look
to
to
reactivate
the
site
and
bring
something
to
it.
We'd
like
to
partner
in
applying
for
that,
so
we
did
apply
for
a
Tennessee
Department
of
Economic
Community
Development
site
prep
grant.
V
We
were
awarded
a
grant
along
with
24
other
communities
across
the
state
and
it
will
cover
things
like
updated
phase,
1
study,
phase,
2
studies,
a
wetland
review,
archaeological
review,
protected
species
survey,
geological
support,
master
planning,
mass
grading
plan
for
pad
ready,
say
an
engineering
plan
for
relocation
of
sewer
lines,
all
those
kinds
of
things.
So
it
is
a
$100,000
grant
and
there
a
$100,000
match
to
it.
V
We
have
it
in
a
line
item
and
economic
development
for
business
development,
for
site
prep
for
for
large
projects,
and
that's
the
line
item
that
we
would
like
to
use
for
that,
and
so
this
is
a
resolution
that
is
authorizing
the
mayor
to
accept
the
grant
and
provide
the
match
so
we're
doing
that
ahead
of
ahead
of
taking
care
of
that
little.
You
know
last
perfect
and
I'm
I'm
open
for
any
questions.
If
you
have
any
questions,
we
are
still
awaiting
the
final
award
document
from
the
state.
V
At
this
point,
they
issued
a
press
release
on
Wednesday.
The
21st
we've
received
a
letter
essentially
stating
the
same
the
same
day.
Saying
congratulations.
You
were
you
were
selected
along
with
other
communities
and
we're
just
waiting
for
the
final
document
that
would
have
to
be
signed,
and
at
that
point
we
would
need
to
attach
with
it
a
resolution
saying
that
we
are
authorizing
the
existing
match
with
that
or
the
$100,000
match.
With
that,
any
questions.
M
V
Not
know
at
this
point
we
have
not.
You
know
that
we've
had
conversations
around
it,
but
we've
had
conversations
around
a
number
of
tips
throughout
the
community.
I
think
it's
just
a
function
of
you
know
what
the
community
needs
and
and
the
highest
and
best
use
for
the
site,
and
then
what
would
go
along
with
that?
Thank.
R
I'm
glad
is
something
happening
getting
ready
to
happen,
but
I
most
definitely
would
love
to
see.
It
start
to
begin
to
get
developed
Wow,
it's
still
their
office,
because
I
think
that
again
I'm
a
plus
one,
and
it
would
be
something
that
he's
doing
and
that's
something
that
we
continue
work
from
other
previous
mayor's.
So
I
would
love
to
see
that
happen
and
just
wanted
you
to
know
that
I
share
that
same
sentiment
with
getting
notified,
not
in
a
timely
manner.
So
I
could
just
imagine
how
your
plate
was.
R
You
probably
was
giving
it
a
week
or
so
before
and
say
it
here
and
then
you
would
say
knocked
out
to
the
walls
which
will
be
us
to
get
real,
but
the
people
that
is
responsible
for
doing
it
during
out
here
to
be
addressed
on.
Why
is
that
a
continuous
thing
that
they
can
they
always
do?
They
always
do
this
with
city
councilors.
If
we
don't
matter.
V
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
comments
and
I'd
also
like
to
say
that
you
know
both.
You
know.
Public
works
working
on
this
project
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
you
know
businesses
saw
some
relief,
the
same
with
with
C
dot,
with
the
paving
project,
I
mean
there's
recognition
and
I
think
as
a
staff.
We
all
came
together
and
said:
okay,
you
know,
while
we're
working
on
these
projects,
we
need
to
ourselves
support
these
businesses.
So
you
know,
if
you
saw
I,
was
working
on
a
Saturday.
V
That's
that's
part
of
that.
Earlier
mitigation
grant
is
wanting
to
say
we'd
like
to
give
you
help
as
soon
as
possible,
but
then
also
you
know
with
everything
else.
It's
we
recognize.
We
need
to
do
a
better
job
planning
and
we
need
to
plan
across
departments
and
we
need
to
collaborate,
and
we
need
to
do
that
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
we
hear
you.
N
P
N
B
Ordinance
amending
Chattanooga,
City
Code
part
2
chapter
11
by
the
addition
of
a
new
article
17
entitled
small
businesses,
business
construction
mitigation
grant
program
and
to
a
Menor
de
Nez,
known
as
the
FY
2018
budget,
ordinance
so
as
to
reappropriation
or
$19,000
from
the
department
of
economic
and
Community
Development
for
use
in
the
small
business
construction
mitigation
grant
program
to
the
industrial
development
board.
Well,.
B
N
B
Authorizing
the
administrator
for
the
department
of
economic
and
Community
Development
to
award
home
program
funding
to
Chattanooga
Community
Housing
Development
Organisation
for
the
development
of
the
affordable,
homeownership
opportunities
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
and
fifty
five
thousand
dollars
in
two
tower
construction
company
to
develop
for
affordable
rental
houses
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
for
a
total
amount
of
$350,000
$15,000
and
to
authorized
every
allocation
of
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
in
home.
Funding
from
a
previously
authorized.