►
From YouTube: Chattanooga City Council Meeting 01-11-22
Description
Chattanooga City Council Meeting — 01-11-22
A
A
A
A
B
Item
a
an
ordinance
closing
and
abandoning
a
portion
of
a
right
of
way
located
at
the
corner
of
west
26th,
street
or
coward
street
as
detailed
on
the
attached
map
subject
to
certain
conditions.
Item
b
norton
is
closing
an
abandoned
portion
of
the
2500
block
of
east
16th
street
and
an
unopened
alley
as
detailed
on
the
attached
map.
Subject,
certain
conditions.
A
B
A
C
A
B
A
A
B
B
A
C
Yes,
sir,
there
is
opposition
that
has
reached
out
to
me
so
have
that
recorded
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
table
this
item?
It's
because
I
have
received
information
from
cdot.
I
have
talked
to
rpa
and
also
our
chattanooga
fire
department.
There
are
some
some
pretty
serious
concerns
with
access
to
this
property
that
need
to
be
addressed,
and
instead
of
deferring
this
to
a
specific
date,
I
want
to
be
able
to
create
the
space
this
needs
for
that
conversation
to
have
between
those
agencies.
C
A
A
B
B
An
ordnance
to
a
manchester
united
city
code,
part
2,
chapter
38,
zoning
ordinance.
So
it's
the
reason.
Parts
of
a
property
located
at
10,
1001
airport
road
and
an
unaddressed
property
located
in
the
5900
block
of
hancock
road
from
r1
residential
zone
are
two
residential
zones:
c2
convenience,
commercial
zone,
m2,
light
industrial
zone
and
m3
warehouse
and
wholesale
zone
to
m1
manufacturing
zone.
A
A
B
A
A
E
Of
the
overview,
this
is
a
rezoning
at
3106,
east
10th
avenue,
rezoning
from
m1
manufacturing
zone
to
r1
residential
zone.
The
proposed
use
is
a
single
is
single-family
residential.
This
is
in
the
east
lake
area.
The
applicants
request
a
rezoning
that
so
they
can
pull
a
permit
to
add
an
addition
to
an
existing
home
staff
and
planning
commission
both
found.
The
request
is
compatible
with
the
plan
surrounding
the
land
uses
and
development
form
of
the
area.
E
Residences
are
not
allowed
in
the
m1
zone.
That
does,
and
that
is
what
triggers
the
resenting
requirement
to
r1.
So
staff
and
planning
commission
recommended
approval
the
re
approval
of
the
rezoning
to
r1
and
we
did
not
have
opposition
present
at
planning
commission.
So
I'm
unaware
of
the
concerns
at
this
time.
Okay,.
C
E
E
C
A
A
A
Okay,
so
this
is
the
applicant
okay,
I
was
confused.
I
thought
you
raised
your
hand
when
I
asked
for
opposition
councilwoman.
Would
you
like
to
hear
from
the
applicant
or
okay
you'll
be
given?
Well,
since
I'm
not
seeing
any
opposition
at
this
time,
you'll
be
given
a
total
of
nine
minutes.
If
you'd
like
to
present.
A
F
A
A
A
G
A
The
applicant
is
present:
is
there
any
opposition
to
this
case
present
councilwoman
dontley,
I'm
seeing
an
applicant
with
no
opposition
present.
At
this
time
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
approve
6g
with
a
proper
second.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
before
we
vote
roll
call,
please
councilwoman.
A
A
B
A
B
B
A
A
A
E
Okay,
I
will
touch
on
the
slides
that
I
went
if
the
still
no
slides
I
will
have
to
I'll
do
a
little
description
too.
So
this
is
a
result:
request
to
rezone
property
at
27
oaks,
2700
oak
street,
from
r1
residential
zone
to
r4
special
zone.
The
proposed
use
is
conformed
to
the
current
use
of
the
property.
E
E
So
if
you'll
pardon
me
I'll,
just
read
a
few
excerpts
from
the
staff
report,
the
site
is
surrounded
by
a
mix
of
uses
including
office
institution,
a
multi-family
and
two-family
residential.
The
proposal
to
use
the
property
for
residential
and
office
use
is
compatible
with
adjacent
uses.
However,
the
r4
zone
allows
for
other
uses.
It
may
not
can
be
compatible,
such
as
banks
with
drive-throughs,
dormitories
and
hospitals.
E
The
proposal
to
retain
the
existing
one
story
structure
for
an
office
is
compatible
with
adjacent
development
form
staff,
recommends
conditions
limiting
the
building
height
and
retaining
the
existing
structure
to
ensure
compatibility
with
adjacent
residential
form.
Approving
the
r4
zone
at
this
location
we'll
introduce
the
mixed
use
zone
into
the
2700
block
of
oak
street.
However,
there
is
an
r3
zone
property
across
the
street
at
2608,
glenwood,
parkway
and
r4
zone
property
to
the
north.
E
Excuse
me
it's
actually
south
at
mcauley
school,
so
staff
recommendation
was
to
deny
the
r4
zone
and
approve
the
01
office
zone,
subject
of
conditions
related
to
I'm,
retaining
the
existing
structure
limiting
building
height,
limiting
the
time
for
dumpster,
pickup
and
language
related
to
limitations
for
just
one
monument
sign.
There
was
opposition
at
planning
commission.
E
Commission
recommendation
is
to
not
to
deny
the
r4
special
zone
and
approve
the
01
office
zone
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
retain
existing
structure
and
building
height
limited
to
two
and
a
half
stories
or
35
feet,
no
dumpster
services
for
trash
pickup
and
one
monument
sign
which
shall
be
set
back
10
feet
from
any
property
line
and
one
building
sign
shall
be
permitted.
The
monument
sign
shall
not
exceed
48
square
feet
in
area
and
shall
not
be
more
than
four
feet
in
height.
E
If
illuminated,
the
sun
shall
be
indirectly
lit
in
such
a
way
that
the
light
source
cannot
be
seen
from
any
public
way
or
adjoining
property.
The
lighting
intensity
shall
not
exceed
25
foot
candles
at
the
face
of
the
sign.
No
flashing
or
intermittent
much
will
be
prohibited
and
no
internally
illuminated
signs
shall
be
permitted.
Pole
signs
are
prohibited
and
those
conditions
are
intended
to
help
mitigate
the
impact
of
the
proposed
use
on
neighboring
residences.
A
D
D
I'm
harry
cash,
I'm
a
lawyer
with
grant
cumberland
harrison
and
I'm
the
applicant
for
phoenix,
rising
properties
llc.
In
this
case,
much
of
what
I
had
planned
to
say.
Ms
rennick
just
just
told
you
all
it's
an
application.
As
originally
filed,
the
application
was
to
resign
for
the
applicant
purchased
this
property
because
they
loved
the
home.
D
G
D
D
They
knew
that
it
had
been
business
property
for
at
least
14
years
prior
to
that,
the
prior
owners,
maggie
armstrong
and
bart-
are
both
here
and
what
they
would
tell
you
is
that,
while
they
owned
the
property
for
14
years
and
perhaps
prior
to
that,
there
had
been
various
businesses
there,
there
had
been
an
antique
shop,
a
realtor's
office,
a
catering
business.
It
was
a
venue
for
hosting
weddings,
family
reunions
parties
similar
things
once
upon
a
time.
D
D
Our
rpa
and
the
planning
commission
recommended
denial
of
the
r4
recommended
approval
of
an
0-1
zoning
with
certain
conditions.
The
applicant
is
agrees
to
those
conditions.
In
fact,
one
of
the
conditions
is
that
one
monument
sign
which
shall
be
set
back
10
feet
from
the
property
line
and
one
building
sign
shall
be
permitted.
They
never
plan
to
put
a
sign
there.
D
D
As
ms
renick
said,
the
basis
for
the
both
the
staff
recommendation
and
the
planning
commission
recommendation
for
the
01
zoning
with
conditions
is
that
the
request
is
compatible
with
the
area
3
planned,
secondary
uses,
adjacent
land
use
and
development
form.
The
site
is
surrounded
by
a
mix
of
users,
including
office,
institutional
multi-family
and
two-family
residential.
D
D
D
As
a
member
of
the
glenwood
neighborhood,
I
support
the
rezoning
of
2700
oak
street
chattanooga,
tennessee
37404
owned
by
dr
keith
and
angie
nichols
from
r1
to
r4
for
the
purpose
of
operations
of
their
preventive
medical
practice,
tier
1,
health
and
wellness,
and
it's
signed
by
jewell
jackson,
diane
meadows,
olin,
ivy,
tommy,
dylan
and
donald
sanderfer.
We
would
have
had
some
of
those
people,
or
hopefully
all
of
those
people
here,
had
we
not
known
that
this
matter
was
not
going
to
be
deferred
for
one
more
time.
D
Let
me
just
conclude
by
saying
that
the
residents
consider
this
their
home.
They
decorated
it
for
christmas.
They
have
dogs,
they
have
things
at
their
homes
that
most
of
the
rest
of
us
have
they
don't
want
it
to
be
anything
but
their
home.
They
bought
it
in
good
faith,
thinking
that
it
they
could
conduct
their
business
there.
They
conducted
their
business
there
for
for
quite
some
time,
and
then
a
former
owner
from
long
ago
apparently
made
a
complaint
about
it.
D
There
wasn't
any
problem
with
the
neighborhood
prior
to
that
complaint,
but
code
enforcement
tells
me,
and
understandably
that,
once
a
complaint
is
filed
with
them,
they
have
to
look
into
it.
That's
what
they
did.
That's
what
led
to
this
request
to
rezone,
but
if
this
property
is
rezoned
0-1
with
the
conditions
as
recommended
by
staff
and
the
planning
commission,
the
neighborhood
will
not
see
any
difference
in
what
has
happened.
What
has
been
going
on
out
there,
since
these
people
have
owned
it
and
frankly,
less
problems
than
happened
previously.
D
C
D
C
C
A
I
Nine,
nine,
publicly
or
nine,
either
reached
out
to
me
or
publicly
opposed
it
and
three
have
supported
it.
So
it's
nine
to
three:
that's
a
very
small
number
considering
we
have
800
or
some
somewhere
there
about
number
of
homes.
So
that's
a
very
small
representation,
so
yeah
just
on
behalf
of
the
glenwood
neighborhood
association,
I
wanted
to
share
those
numbers
and
I've
shared
those
with
councilwoman
coonrod.
I
I
personally
oppose
it.
I
own
four
properties
and
in
several
acres
in
glenwood
I
bought
a
few
of
them
like
I
bought.
I
bought
some
of
that
property
last
year,
but
I
I
pose
it
for
several
reasons
and
just
to
skip
ahead
to
some
of
those
reasons,
and
I
was
also
on
the
area,
three
historic
river
to
ridge,
planning
or
sorry
the
advisory
committee.
I
My
name
is
listed
in
the
front
of
the
book
or
is
acknowledged
in
the
front
of
the
book
as
contributing
to
the
planning
process
for
the
historic
river
ridge
area,
three
plan,
but
anyway,
but
so
reasons
for
opposing
it.
One
of
the
priorities
identified
through
the
area
iii
plan
or
the
historic
river
to
ridge
plan
is
affordable
housing.
So
every
house
that
we
give
to
a
business
instead
of
a
home
reduces
our
inventory
of
housing.
So
I
feel
that
this
move
would
be
in
conflict
with
the
affordable
housing
priority.
I
That's
been
identified
additionally,
another
ident
another
priority
that
was
identified
through
the
air
3
plan
is
preserving
our
homes,
as
was
mentioned
previously.
So
I
guess
I
guess
this
plan
has.
I
guess
this.
This
rezoning
has
been
found
to
be
agreeable
with
the
area
three
plan
in
ways,
but
at
least
in
those
two
ways,
I
don't
I
see
how
it
would
preserve
our
neighborhood
and
I
don't
see
how
it
would
preserve,
affordable
housing.
F
I
People
didn't
ask
for
more
telemedicine
or
for
medical
facilities,
so
so
that's
another
thing
within
the
area
3
plan.
That's
not
something.
People
said
that
they
wanted.
We
want.
We
want
single-family
housing,
we
want
grocery,
we
want.
We
want
retail
other
things
like
that,
but
I
would
refer
you
back
to
the
area
3
plan
for
what
people
did
say
they
want
and
see
if
there
are
more
telemedicine
or
medical
sort
of
places
within
that
another
thing
is
changing.
I
The
fate
of
this
property
will
also
ultimately
alter
the
fate
of
the
10
homes
to
the
west
of
it
on
the
on
the
block
to
the
west
of
it.
I
think
because
this
is
a
more
premier
home
for
that
little
spot
and
just
to
try
to
wrap
up
real,
quick,
it'll
change
the
face
of
the
street.
If
we
do
get
signage,
they
make
wonderful
promises
about
no
signage
and
about
keeping
it
the
same
now,
but
without
restrictions.
There's
there's
no
real
promise
to
that
so,
and
I'll
just
give
the
rest
of
the
time.
J
My
name
is
jack
and
thomas
and
I've
been
a
resident
of
glenville
for
the
last
27
years
resident
of
chattanooga
for
over
35..
I
am
one
of
those
residents
that
oppose
this
in
a
great
opposition
due
to
the
fact
that
glenwood
preservation,
the
historic
homes
in
glenwood,
are
just
that.
I
heard
mr
ledford
explain
simply
to
you
all.
Oh
this,
it
has
been
this.
It
has
been
that
the
fact
is
that
this
house,
they,
the
residents
at
this
this
house,
requested
to
rezone
it
years
ago
they
were
denied.
J
J
They've
been
illegally
doing
things
as
a
business.
They
have
not
been
given
approval
by
glenwood,
and
I
still
stand
here
and
say:
allow
something
in
chattanooga
to
remain
the
same.
It's
okay!
If
we
want
to
be
just
a
historic
district
without
offices,
we're
surrounded
by
offices,
the
hospital
offices-
and
we
have
all
talked
with
the
hospitals,
we've
compromised
and
I
have
seen
them
chip
away
one
house
at
a
time
in
glenwood
now,
they're
crossing
over
glenwood
drive
now
we're
starting
there.
Once
we
set
this
president
others
will
come.
J
We
know
that,
and
so
I
just
asked
you
all
to
allow
glenwood
to
preserve
glenwood
allow
us
to
remain
residential.
We
talk
about
housing
shortages
all
the
time
we
are
not
trying
to
intertwine
businesses
because
we
already
have
it.
We
want
to
reserve
our
residential
housing
and
we
ask
you
all
to
please
help
us
do
that,
not
all
of
the
simple
things
that
councilman
ledford
suggested,
because
that's
not
true,
and
so
that
leads
me
to
know,
leave
us
glenwood
historic
homes
to
silicon,
that's
one
of
the
biggest
better
historic
song
other
than
the
governor's
mansion.
J
J
A
K
G
One
of
the
things
that
I
didn't
hear,
my
name
is
donald
sanderfer,
I'm
on
my
fourth
term
as
a
president
of
the
glenwood
neighborhood
association,
one
of
the
things
that
our
secretary
said
that
was
incorrect.
We
don't
have
the
authorization
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
glenwood
neighborhood
association,
so
I
hope
you
all
as
me
as
myself
being
the
president.
G
Please
disregard
that
part
about
the
glenwood
neighborhood
association,
because
we
did
not
authorize
anyone
not
even
me
to
come
and
speak
on
behalf
of
the
glenwood
liquid
association,
but
I
am
here
for
of
them
this
some
type
of
help
to
help
these
people
be
the
residents
and
do
the
work
in
that
neighborhood,
because
I've
been
in
that
neighborhood
for
50
years.
Since
I
was
15
years
old,
I'm
on
my
way
to
68.
A
D
D
What
I
would
say
is
to
the
somebody
pointed
out
that
there
was
a
rezoning
request
years
ago
and
that
rezoning
request,
I
think
it
was
recommended
for
denial
of
planning,
commission
and
then
withdrawn.
The
area
three
river
ridge
plan
was
not
in
force
had
not
been
developed
and
approved
at
that
time.
What
the
now
tell
us
is
that
the
0-1
rezoning
does
comply
with
the
existing
plan
for
this
property.
D
The
other
thing
there
was
some
discussion
about
this
property
they're
talking
now
about
they're,
not
going
to
change
anything
well,
one
of
the
conditions
that
they
have
agreed
to
is
that
they
will
retain
the
existing
structure
and
building
height
limited
to
two
and
a
half
stories
or
35
feet.
They've
agreed
to
that
I'll
answer.
Any
questions
you
have,
but
that's
our
presentation.
D
D
H
H
H
So
I
want
to
do
all
I
can
to
make
this
to
make
this
work
for
the
business
and
the
community
before
we
go
any
further,
and
I
don't
want
to
just
urgently
make
a
decision
that
could
impact
either
so
we're
going
to
defer
it
to
february
the
15th.
That
gives
everybody
an
opportunity
to
meet
once
twice
three
times
four
times
as
many
times
as
needed
and
work
with
the
city
attorney
to
get
clarity
along
with
what
rpa
is
suggesting.
When
karen
send
that
information
out
and
then
we'll
decide,
then.
A
B
A
H
A
A
B
C
E
Yes,
this
alternate
version
reduces
setbacks
in
within
the
urban
overlay
zone
and
just
as
a
reminder,
the
urban
overlay
zone,
it's
kind
of
the
river
to
ridge
north
portion
of
north
chattanooga.
So
it
allows
that
more
urban
form,
I'm
using
this
zoning
tool
only
within
the
or
within
the
urban
overlay,
and
removes
the
site
plan
requirement
which
is
redundant
because
that's
already
required
as
part
of
the
process.
So
it
doesn't
address
any
setbacks
outside
the
urban
overload
that
outside
the
urban
overlay,
those
would
remain
the
same.
E
A
A
A
B
C
All
right,
let
me
hit
my
light.
I
want
to
second
that
motion,
but
also
to
advise.
I
did
spend
quite
a
bit
of
time
on
the
phone
with
mr
martin
and
I've
found
him
to
be
a
fascinating
individual
who
loves
the
outdoors,
can't
wait
to
get
to
chattanooga
and
has
the
credentials,
I
think,
will
help
strengthen
partnerships
not
only
with
our
non-profit
community,
but
also
building
awareness
for
outdoor
activities
for
members
in
our
community
that
have
never
seen
that
and
that's
something
we
talked
about
that.
A
C
Chairman,
thank
you.
I
will
be
making
a
motion
to
approve
mr
reuter.
I
also
had
a
very
lengthy
conversation.
This
is
the
someone
I
will
be
working
with
as
chairman
of
planning
and
zoning
very
extensively
and
his
credentials
are
quite
impressive,
and
I
believe
that
his
ability
for
regional
plan
development
and
implementation
is
something
that
really
caught
my
eye
as
we
go
through
our
zoning
assessment.
I
think
it's
very
important,
I'm
very
impressed
with
the
transportation
and
his
tpo
along
with
his
mpo.
A
C
A
L
A
B
Item
d,
a
resolution
authorizing
administrator
for
the
department
of
public
works
to
execute
a
second
amendment
to
the
environmental
and
economic
infrastructure
improvements
plan,
e2
i2,
an
interlocal
agreement
for
cost
sharing
between
the
city
of
chattanooga
and
hamilton,
county
water
and
wastewater
treatment
authority
as
part
of
the
city
of
chattanooga's
consent
decree
and
said
amendment
to
extend
the
deadline
to
complete
the
project.
Item
e
resolution
authorizing
the
administrator
for
the
department
of
public
works
to
approve
change
order.
A
B
A
B
A
L
L
I
can't
read
this
now:
one
zero
five,
six
three
three
with
gallagher
benefit
services
for
an
increase
of
sixty
thousand
dollars
to
accommodate
employee
appeals
for
the
pay
plan
implementation.
We
determined
today
that
we
actually
need
a
little
more
time
to
evaluate
this
and
determine
the
exact
amount
that
we
will
need.
So
we
are
asking
to
just
withdraw
this
and
take
no
action
tonight.
A
L
L
All
right,
thank
you.
All
the
the
three
left,
the
first
one
is
purchasing
department.
This
is
second
and
final
contract
renewal
for
city-wide,
bottled
water,
coolers
and
accessories
ds,
services
of
america,
inc,
dba,
crystal
springs.
Water
company
submitted
a
13
price
increase
at
the
time
of
renewal,
with
an
annual
amount
not
to
exceed
25
000
per
year.
This
is
recommended
for
approval
number
two
from
waste
resources.
Division
of
public
works.
This
is
a
new
blanket
contract
for
painting
services.
This
will
be
a
four-year
contract
with
an
amount
not
to
exceed
300
000
per
year.
L
Three
bids
were
received
and
the
award
goes
to
quality
mechanical
group
inc
as
the
best
bid
meeting
specifications
and
the
last
one
is
from
information
technology.
This
is
a
new
standard
purchase
order
with
blue
line
solutions,
llc
for
two
trailer
mounted
surveillance
surveillance,
cameras
for
the
chattanooga
police
department.
The
purchase
amount
is
thirty
thousand
dollars.
Thirty
thousand
nine
hundred
sixty
seven
dollars.
A
B
A
A
A
We've
had
a
recent
vacancy
on
the
vehicle
for
hire
board
and
I
would
like
to
appoint
chuck
o'mary
to
the
vehicle
for
hire
board.
Chuck
cole,
mary.
Thank
you
all
right.
That
concludes
all
of
our
agenda
items
this
afternoon,
and
it
takes
us
to
the
time
that
we
recognize
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
at
this
time.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
address
the
council
all
right?
I
thought
so
I'm
going
to
ask
the
madam
attorney.
M
N
Yes,
sir
hello,
my
name
is
joshua
kapellisch
and
I
am
an
advocate
for
unsheltered
citizens
of
chattanooga.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
I
come
before
you
today,
as
I
have
many
times
before
since
2018.
I've
attended
many
meetings
regarding
homelessness
and
while
I
recognize
significant
investment
by
the
city
on
behalf
of
the
public,
the
number
of
homeless
in
chattanooga,
as
is
at
an
unprecedented
level,
there
are
several
hundred
people
struggling
to
survive
each
night
in
our
city
and
some
are
dying.
N
N
N
N
Yesterday
we
fed
a
hundred
people
in
an
hour
with
a
team
of
10
people
sponsored
by
a
local
business.
We've
had
a
new
york
strip,
I'm
requesting
that
you
graciously
allow
me
to
make
a
presentation
as
soon
as
possible,
so
we
together
can
save
lives.
Our
presence
online
has
drawn
thousands
of
views
of
our
progress
and
with
the
support
of
the
community,
I
will
follow
up
with
an
email
to
the
council
later
this
week.
N
O
Hello,
my
name
is
jimmy
urcioli,
I'm
the
director
of
green
steps,
we're
a
non-profit
here
in
chattanooga
that
focuses
on
litter
mitigation
as
well
as
waste
reduction.
We
were
one
of
the
non-profits
selected
to
participate
in
the
recycling
pit
project
that
aimed
to
increase
recycling
efficiency
here
in
chattanooga.
O
Part
of
my
background
and
understanding
solid
waste
is
an
epa
funded
program
that
I'm
certified
in
called,
don't
waste
it.
One
of
the
things
that
I
learned
in
this
programming
that
was
very
compelling
was
about
plastic
recycling.
Now
city
of
chattanooga
accepts
plastics,
one
through
seven
in
our
curbside
single
stream
services.
O
But
the
reality
of
this
is
is
that
plastic
number
one
and
twos
in
a
bottle
or
a
jug
form
are
generally
the
only
ones
that
make
it
to
an
actual
end
product
that's
been
recycled,
so
I
had
some
questions
for
our
murph
material
recovery
facility,
which
is
west
rock
on
what
is
exactly
happening
to
these
other
types
of
plastics.
Three
through
seven.
O
My
my
question
to
them
was
understanding
that
these
are
generally
not
recyclable.
Single
stream
services
collect
these
anyway.
Is
there
a
current
market
for
these
plastics
and
where
exactly
do
they
end
up?
I
hope
that
I'm,
that
chattanooga
is
an
exception
to
the
rule,
but
would
like
a
clearer
answer.