►
From YouTube: Chattanooga City Council Meeting - 9/12/23
Description
Chattanooga City Council Meeting - 9/12/23
A
A
2023
city
council,
revised
city
council
agenda
meetings
or
business
meeting
to
order
we
have
Pledge
of
Allegiance
and
implication
by
Madame
Vice,
chair
Hill,.
A
A
Indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all,
what
is
the
agenda?
Madam
chair
all
right?
Thank
you!
So
much
tonight
we
have
a
very
healthy,
healthy
agenda.
We
do
have
a
special
presentation.
Today
we
have
a
farm
based
code,
appeal
hearing
for
foreign-based
code
2315
for
18
manufacturers,
Road,
and
how
this
will
work
is
we
have
a
presentation
by
staff?
If
you
can
come
on
up,
we
have
a
presentation
by
staff.
The
applicant
present.
B
A
Right
so
we
have
the
applicant
president
of,
is
there
opposition
present
yeah
all
right?
Okay,
so
we
have
I,
see
applicant
and
opposition.
So
again
we
had
a
presentation
and
then
we'll
have
seven
minutes
for
the
applicant
to
make
that
presentation.
Nine
minutes
for
the
opposition
to
make
their
statements
and
then
we'll
have
if
the
applicant
needs
or
wants
a
two-minute
rebutal
from
the
applicant.
So
with
that
in
mind,
councilman
Henderson
thank.
C
You,
madam
chair,
for
laying
out
the
process
for
this
I
do
know.
There's
at
least
two
distinct
groups
here
in
opposition
and
I
would
ask
that
each
group
at
least
be
allowed
to
speak
and
and
I
understand
if
they
have
to
stay
within
the
compiles
of
the
nine
minutes.
But
I
would
request
that
at
least
each
group
got
to
speak
and
be
heard
all.
A
Right
so
I
hope
everyone
heard
that
he
has
councilman.
Henderson
has
requested
that
each
group,
so
as
you
get
up
to
speak,
just
be
reminded
you'll
have
a
timer
here
to
say.
Nine
minutes
so
just
be
reminded
that
you're
speaking,
that
it's
a
total
nine
minutes,
it's
not
18
minutes.
So
it's
a
total
nine
minutes
for
both
groups.
Anyone
else
in
anyone
else
in
opposition
so
just
be
sure
to
be
mindful
of
the
time
and
be
mindful
of
each
other,
all
right.
All
right!
Thank
you.
A
Councilman
Henderson,
all
right
Dallas,
whenever
you're
ready
thank.
D
You
Council
the
the
top
letter
is
the
letter
about
the
PO
and
basic
report
on
what
happened
on
June
8
2023
at
2
pm.
The
form-based
code
committee
was
called
to
order
in
the
development
Resource
Center
room
1A
case
number
fbc-2315
418
manufacturers
Road
was
heard.
There
were
two
notifications
requested.
D
D
The
property
is
owned:
R
Dash
rf-6,
the
RF,
the
r
Dash
FR
Zone,
allows
for
multi-unit
living
file
plus
units
building
hot
allows
six
stories
85
Feet
max.
While
the
additional
story
was
approved
by
the
committee.
The
elevation
shows
the
building
at
84
feet
and
six
inches
attached
includes
the
form-based
meeting
a
sign-in
sheet.
A
motion
form
the
presentation
to
the
form-based
committee.
D
Major
modification
includes
elevations
form-based
code
modification
applications,
picture
of
the
site
survey
site
survey,
the
neighbor
I'm,
sorry,
the
neighborhood
meeting
I
had
it
listed
as
the
meeting
for
that
was
in
our
department,
but
we
can
get
that
if
you
need
it.
Opposition
letter,
major
modification
permit
and
notice
of
hearing
picture.
That's
the
sign
that
we
post
there's
the
form-based
code
committee
sign-in
sheet,
those
that
were
present
at
the
the
form.
The
hearing
for
the
modification
notice
that
was
posted
of
the
hearing.
D
There's
the
sign
that
was
posted
on
the
site:
here's
information
from
the
form-based
code
about
the
ability
to
appeal
the
form-based
code
committees,
action.
D
D
Here's
descriptions
of
social
story,
hype
setback
in
parking,
references.
D
D
That's
that's
all
I
have
do
well,
there's
some
ornaments
here.
If
that
was
at
the
meeting.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
what
took
place
at
the
meeting.
E
I'm
temporarily,
serving
as
the
form-based
code
staff,
so
I
put
together
this
presentation
and
was
at
the
meeting
for
the
form-based
code
committee,
Dallas
kind
of
went
over
everything
it's
allowed
in
form-based
code
to
for
the
major
modifications
to
be
approved
for
one
story
by
the
form-based
code
committee,
and
that
is
what
was
reviewed
and
approved
at
the
committee.
Okay,.
E
E
A
And
we
do
have
two
questions:
councilman
Smith,
followed
by
councilman
Henderson.
Thank.
G
You,
madam
chair,
I,
think
my
question
was
just
answered.
The
way
this
is
written,
it
says
an
increase
in
height
from
six
stories
to
seven,
but
technically
it
may
not
actually
be
an
increase
in
height.
It's
just
an
increase
in
stories
number
of
stories.
Yes,
that
is
correct.
Okay,
just
making
sure
I
understood
that.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
Dallas.
Melissa
is
it?
Is
it
fairly
common
practice
when
an
applicant
comes
requesting
one
additional
story
for
that
to
be
granted
by
the
form-based
code.
E
It
is
I
think
that's
actually
was
discussed
in
this
specific
meeting
that
day,
because
I
think
a
side
close
to
it
had
also
been
granted
a
story.
Thank.
A
You
see
councilman
Henderson
yeah,
all
right.
We
have
two
more
questions:
Madam
councilwoman,
Burrs
following
by
metal
and
vice
chair
heal.
Thank.
E
Yes,
we
had
the
application
submitted
by
the
deadline.
The
sign
notification
was
posted
two
weeks
prior,
the
we
had
a
neighborhood
meeting
or
the
applicant
had
a
neighborhood
meeting
as
required.
We
sent
out
public
notice
to
all
the
neighbors,
using
our
Standard
address,
scooper
that
we
have
in
the
office
and
listed
in
the
newspaper
a
week
prior
was.
H
E
I
You,
madam
chair,
so
I
just
want
to
put
a
finer
point
on
the
two
modifications
that
were
requested,
so
to
be
certain
that
we
all
understand.
So
there
was
one
modification
requested
to
add
the
seventh
story,
but
not
to
go
above
the
85
feet
and
the
other,
and
that
was
approved.
I
A
Right,
thank
you,
madam
Vice,
chair
Council,
any
additional
questions
for
Dallas
or
Melissa
all
right.
Thank
you
all
so
much.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
okay.
So
with
that,
if
the
applicant
or
applicant
representative
is
present,
if
y'all
could
put
seven
minutes
on
the
clock,
you
have
seven
minutes
feel
free
to
not
take
all
that
time,
but
you
have
seven
minutes
on
the
clock.
J
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Joseph
Wingfield
and,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
our
presentation
up
here,
do
I
need
to
do
anything
for
that
I'll.
Do
it
all
right?
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Joseph
Wingfield
sure.
C
A
J
J
Both
our
parents
are
from
Chattanooga
and
all
four
of
our
grandparents,
which
add
Newton's.
Also
we
run
and
operate
a
small
family
business
that
my
grandfather
started
in
1937
at
Wingfield,
Scale,
Company,
small
business,
48
employees
and
we're
enjoying
our
86th
year.
Here
in
Chattanooga
in
2008,
we
had
the
opportunity
to
buy
a
piece
of
property.
My
family
did
and
we've
enjoyed
that
piece
of
property
very
much.
We
think
it's
an
important
piece
of
property,
a
significant
piece
of
property,
and
we
still
think
that
way.
J
We
have
regular
offers
on
that
property
over
the
last
15
years
plus
and
because
of
the
significance
to
us
we
have.
We
also
know
that
we're
not
developers
and
the
significance
of
this
property.
We
wanted
to
get
the
design
and
the
plan
right,
and
we
took
our
time
to
do
that.
Speaking
of
the
developer,
we
got
to
know
the.
J
And
Chris
sin
in
particular,
and
we
met
in
2011
Chris
was
not
married,
didn't
have
any
at
that
time.
He
has
a
paltry
Three
Sons
with
a
fork
on
the
way,
but
we
I've
seen
their
developments
in
Hilton,
Head,
South
Carolina
in
Charleston,
South,
Carolina
and
Augusta
Georgia
in
Nashville,
Tennessee
and,
most
importantly
in
Chattanooga
Tennessee
with
one
Riverside,
which
they
really
did
a
good
job
with.
So
we
felt
like
we
found
the
right
partner
in
the
sins
and
we're
excited
about
our
design.
J
A
couple
reasons
we're
excited
about
our
design
is
we
had
three
meetings
with
our
Land
Development
Office,
with
Sarah
Robbins
and
Karen
hunt
and
implemented
a
lot
of
their
feedback?
We
held
the
neighborhood
input
meetings
with
one
North
Shore.
We
had
initial.
Our
initial
submittal
was
in
May
as
they
mentioned,
and
then
reviews
and
comments
from
Miss
Mortimer.
B
Good
evening,
everyone,
my
name-
is
Jeremy
Catherine
I'm,
an
attorney
at
Patrick
beard,
Shulman
and
jakeway
I'm
representing
the
developer
and
I.
Think
I
want
to
pitch
this,
for
what
is
actually
an
issue
for
y'all
today
and
what
is
an
issue
is
whether
to
approve
the
seventh
story,
which
is
approved
as
a
routine
as
a
matter
of
routine.
B
The
seventh
story
changes
nothing
about
the
dimensions
of
the
building,
the
width,
Remains,
the
Same,
the
depth,
Remains,
the
Same,
the
height
Remains,
the
Same,
and
the
density
will
remain
the
same,
so
the
units
will
be
consistent.
The
height
will
be
consistent.
The
width
depth
Etc
the
dimensions
will
not
change
foreign.
B
As
was
discussed
at
the
beginning
of
the
report,
the
form-based
code
allows
for
the
seventh
story
to
be
granted
to
orient
everyone.
The
project
here
is
at
the
bottom
left-hand
screen.
It's
circled
in
the
red,
which
is
the
property
that's
available
for
development
under
this
proposed
project,
the
individual,
the
company
that
has
instituted
the
appeal,
is
currently
under
construction
immediately
above
this
project.
It
is
an
apartment
complex.
That
was
what
was
referred
to
as
receiving
the
additional
story
previously.
For
some
reason,
they
have
objected
to
the
same
treatment
for
my
clients.
B
You'll
see
that
one
North
Shore
is
there
to
the
right
and
I'll
I'll
go
through
this,
so
you
can
see
we've.
It
is
our
read
of
the
form-based
code
that
there
needs
to
be
continuity
and
development.
That's
one
of
the
things
that's
been
really
important:
they've
identified,
unique
characters,
characteristics
of
neighborhoods
and
we're
supposed
to
remain
consistent
with
the
development
in
those
areas.
B
This
is
defined
as
a
mid
to
high
level
intensity
or
density
project
where
multi-family
units
predominate,
there's
also
a
desire
and
form-based
codes
for
these
kinds
of
projects
to
be
integrated
into
the
existing
Community
you'll
see
here
that
we
have
a
proposed
molten
walking
trail,
which
is
kind
of
a
multi-use
trail.
There's
tentative
discussions
about
extending
the
Riverwalk
there
you'll
see
that
dotted
line.
There's
a
proposed
walking
trail.
B
What
you'll
see
here
is-
and
I've
alluded
to
this
previously
at
the
top
you'll-
see
that
there
are
five
residential
stories
on
the
seven
story.
Five
stories,
residential,
if
you
go
to
the
bottom
in
the
six
story-
version
there's
five
stories
of
residential
you'll
notice-
that
the
difference
between
the
two
slides
is
the
amount
of
parking
that
is
beneath
the
building.
B
You'll
also
notice
that
we
have
an
83
feet:
Building
height
for
both
the
six
story
and
the
seven
story
versions,
so
the
height
will
remain
the
same.
This
is
another
indication
with
the
blue
arrows
indicating
where
the
extra
parking
or
the
deleted
parking
will
be.
I
think
this
is
the
pivotal
slide,
so
you
all
can
see
what
we're
talking
about.
B
On
the
left
hand,
side.
This
is
the
project
that
we
are
asking
to
move
forward
tonight.
It's
the
seven
stories
here
and
you'll
see
the
green
space
is
preserved
along
the
right
side
of
the
road.
If
you
look
to
the
right
slide,
this
is
the
six
story
with
surface
parking
you'll
see
to
the
top
left.
That's
the
Middle
Street
apartment
complex
that
is
currently
under
construction.
B
There
will
be
a
potential
surface
parking
there
to
the
right
behind
the
one
North
Shore,
and
it
is
our
sincere
hope
that
we
can
avoid
the
landscape,
The
Hardscape
parking
lot
behind
one
North,
Shore
and
integrated
into
the
building
and
I'll
reserve.
My
two
minutes
for
rebuttal
but
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
There
is
well
yes.
H
It
is
yes,
it's
sufficient,
yes,
Okay,
so
I
believe.
Your
first
statement
was
that
it
changes
the
reason
for
it
was
to
go
below
ground.
The
actual
the
building
itself
above
ground
doesn't
change
at
all.
A
J
C
Well,
this
might
be
a
question
for
Miss
Shepherd
or
Mr
Wingfield
one.
The
form-based
code
is
real,
relatively
new
form
of
zoning.
In
this
area.
It
was
actually
requested
by
Councilman,
Mitchell
and
I
to
move
it
from
from
the
kind
of
the
city
center
over
to
the
North
Shore.
But
what
was
this
particular
piece
of
property
zoned
before
form-based
code
rezoned?
It.
F
F
C
C
L
The
C3
Zone
itself
does
not
have
a
lot
of
Standards,
but
there
were
about
13
conditions
that
we
used
for
C3
cases
and
they
got
amended
a
little
bit
for
each
case.
So
I
would
have
to
pull
the
the
ordinance
with
the
rezoning
conditions
to
be
able
to
answer
that,
because
Don
is
right
in
the
sense
that
there
are
not
many
standards
for
C3,
but
we
did
we'd
use
the
same
conditions
multiple
times
to
reinforce
standards.
So
he
bought
the
property
with
C3.
C
L
B
A
A
N
O
Oh
I
I
was.
B
A
A
P
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Harry
cash
I'm,
a
lawyer
here
in
Chattanooga
with
Grant
combo
Lincoln
Harrison
I
represent
Mel
River
operating
company.
Here
with
me,
is
Liz
Palmer
down
from
Nashville
she's,
director
of
development
for
Mill
River.
P
P
P
P
Secondly,
section
g
of
38
696
for
provides
that
development
and
conservation
along
the
riverfront
should
be
balanced
by
promoting
development
scale,
form
that
maintains
public
accessibility
to
the
river
and
considers
public
private
benefits
of
Scenic
views
along
the
river,
pretty
clear
from
what
you
all
were
provided
by
Mr
Rucker
that
this
is
not
going
to
provide
Scenic
views
of
the
river.
In
fact,
it's
going
to
prohibit
views
of
the
river.
This
property
is
going
to
be
right.
Blocking
views
of
the
river.
P
Tennessee
state
law
says
tells
us
when
variances
should
be
approved,
Tennessee
code,
annotated,
section
1372073,
provides
that
variances
should
be
allowed
by
reason
of
exceptional
narrowness,
shallowness
or
shape
of
a
specific
piece
of
property
at
the
time
of
the
enactment
of
the
zoning
regulation
or
by
reason
of
exceptional
topographic
conditions
or
other
extraordinary
and
exceptions,
exceptional
situations
or
conditions
on
the
pace
of
property.
There's
not
there's
no
topographical
problems
with
this
property;
it's
not
unnecessarily
shallow
or
narrow.
That
would
require
a
variance
or
a
modification.
The
modification
requested
simply
would
allow
more
parking
more
parking.
P
You
can
get
more
people
in
I
know.
The
position
is
that
there
are
five
stories
of
apartments,
no
matter
what,
but
if
you
don't
have
sufficient
parking
underground
to
house
those
people
you're
not
gonna
your
Market's
not
going
to
be
nearly
as
good
I
also
want
to
address
one
thing
that
was
brought
up
earlier,
please
yeah.
Q
Yeah,
thank
you
for
having
us
here
this
evening.
I
just
want
to
clarify.
We
are
the
developers
of
the
project
just
to
the
north,
and
we
did
seek
a
variance
under
code.
Q
We
were
allowed
to
go
six
stories
on
one
portion
of
our
site
and
we
were
allowed
to
go
four
stories
on
the
other
portion
of
the
site,
so
we
asked
that
the
four-story
portion
be
granted
to
five,
and
in
return
for
that,
we
lowered
the
six
to
five
I
just
wanted
to
be
very
clear
that
we
did
not
get
an
additional
floor
of
Apartments
on
our
on
our
site.
Thank
you.
P
One
other
thing
I
would
point
out
if
I
think
it's
page
44
of
the
package
that
Mr
Rucker
provided
to
you
all
shows
this
schematic,
and
it
looks
to
me
like
this-
is
actually
an
eight-story
building.
You
have
three
parking
garages
and
then
five
residents
stories
on
top
of
that.
So,
rather
than
a
seven
request
for
seven
story,
I
think
it's
an
eight
story.
A
A
R
Obviously
there
is
some
interest
in
this
I
think
you
all
are
probably
aware
that
there's
an
enormous
amount
of
concern
about
traffic,
I,
think
probably
not
speaking
for
them,
but
I
think
the
idea
that
these
are
apartments
and
it's
residential.
That's
fine,
that's
going
to
be
a
better
neighbor
than
the
industrial
uses
of
whatever.
R
So
this
is
not
a
no
growth,
we
don't
want
Apartments
there
or
whatever,
but
the
real
concern
is
and
I
think
we're
all
familiar
with
that
area
is
the
transportation
system
the
traffic
today
and
what
we
have
learned
in
doing
some
research
on
this
is
that
the
city
is
supposed
to
require
a
traffic
study
for
any
residential
development
with
200
units
or
more
well,
that
ball
got
dropped
with
Middle
Street
and
then
Mr
Wingfield
back
in
2017,
where
you
see
the
the
right
hand
Tower,
he
got
a
land
disturbing
permit
then,
and
that's
normally
when
the
traffic
studies
required,
but
apparently
he
wasn't
asked
to
do
a
traffic
study,
then
so,
based
on
open
records
and
all
the
last
traffic
study,
we
can
see
that
was
done
for
manufacturers.
R
Lots
of
things
have
changed:
lots
of
traffic
lots
of
stress
on
those
intersections
at
manufacturers,
Road
and
Cherokee,
and
even
at
the
at
the
at
the
Market
Street
Bridge
or
whatever.
So
that's
the
big
concern
that
they
have
so
I
I
I
wanted
to
I.
Think
I
passed
this
out.
This
is
a
copy
of
a
memo
summarizing.
R
This
would
acid
just
be
entered
into
the
record
of
the
meeting,
and
let
me
see
if
I
can
just
quickly
I
as
I
said
what
we're
looking
at
with
these
two
developments
combined
is
almost
600
new
units,
and
so
the
people
who
are
there
now
are
saying
wait
a
minute.
The
system
seems
stressed
now
who
is
looking
out
for
us
and
who
has
got
a
plan
for
how
we're
going
to
address
infrastructure.
It's
the
growth
keeping
up
with
the
infrastructure
and,
as
you
know,
in
a
transportation
impact
analysis.
R
What
you
do
is
you
look
primarily
at
intersections
turn,
Lanes
traffic
lights
and
all
and
then
determine
if
there's
some
things
needed
to
mitigate
the
impact
of
the
new
development.
Well,
that
hasn't
been
done
yet,
and
so
so.
For
those
reasons,
the
the
request
from
from
our
group
is
that
that
the
that
the
city
sort
of
take
the
initiative
here
and
agreed
to
provide
oversight,
set
the
parameters
and
coordinate
with
the
two
Developers
for
a
combined
traffic
study
that
that
would
that
would
look
at
the
impact
of
both
developments.
R
What
the
developers
sharing
and
the
cost
of
the
study.
It
seems
right
now
it
doesn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense
for
Middle
Street,
who
somehow
escape
the
requirement
again.
You
know
it
was
just
apparently
those
fell
through
the
cracks
at
the
city
and
I,
guess
that
the
the
Wingfield
folks
haven't
applied
for
a
land
disturbing
permit,
although
they
they
did
in
2017
or
whatever.
R
So
it
seems
to
me
us
like
there
ought
to
be
one
traffic
study
and
the
city
should
coordinate
it,
establish
the
parameters
and
afterwards,
maybe
have
a
neighborhood
meeting
kind
of
reporting
the
findings.
So
so
the
request
of
our
group
is
the
city:
do
this
that
they
sort
of
oversee
the
traffic
study?
R
That
would
include
the
impacts
of
both
developments,
but
we
also
recommend
that
you
continue
this
public
hearing
until
and
set
a
date
two
weeks
three
weeks,
I,
don't
know
how
long
it
takes
to
get
a
traffic
study
done
by
Transportation
a
Planning
Engineer
to
allow
for
completion,
but
because
one
of
the
things
that
it
is
the
case
that,
regarding
the
appeal
that
the
code
says,
You,
must
use
the
guidelines
in
section
so
and
so
to
make
a
final
decision
on
this,
and
it
reads:
one
of
the
things
that
you
need
to
have
a
finding
about
is
the
modification
will
not
significantly
impact
adjacent,
Property,
Owners,
the
character
of
the
area,
traffic
conditions,
etc,
etc.
R
A
I
Thank
you
very
much
with
regard
to
stories
feet.
How
tall
is
your
building
we're
about
I
can
tell
you
all
the
way
to
the
outside
structures.
Let's
say.
I
No
Outdoors,
so
did
you
ask
for
a
seventh
story
and
were
you
denied?
We
did
not?
Okay,
you
did
not
ask
for
one.
No,
we
did
not
and
are
you
currently
building?
We
are.
You
are
okay,
so
your
building
is
not
complete
and
did
you
all
own,
the
property
ever
that
was
along
the
river
in
front
of
the
river
in
front
of
your
property.
We
did
not.
You
did
not.
Okay,
that's
all
for
now.
Thank.
M
S
Your
appeal
is
based
upon
what
the
form-based
code
committee
did
in
connection
with
this
matter
and
whether
you
think
that
that
action
was
appropriate
or
not
at
that
point
in
time
the
form-based
code
committee
merely
granted
one
extra
story
and
they
denied
the
setback
requirement
on
the
riverfront,
so
I
believe.
That's
the
issue
as
to
what
the
form-based
code
committee
did.
H
Is
it
your
position
that
this
was
I?
Believe
you
used
the
word,
a
Boza
action,
I'm,
sorry
of
what
Bozo
a
board
of
zoning
appeals.
That's
the
word.
I
wrote
down
you.
H
And
and
so
you're
saying
that
anytime
form-based
code
makes
a
decision
that
it
is
analogous
to
a
Boza
decision.
It.
H
P
H
At
that's
exactly
my
point,
it
is
different,
so
you're
not
saying
that
they're
limited
to
analogous
yeah
sort
of
kind
of,
but
so
they're
not
held
to
the
Bose
standards
that
you
mentioned
correct
well,.
P
P
H
P
H
P
That's
got
to
be
followed,
and
this
does
not
comply
with
that
and
the
the
consider
the
public
private
benefits
of
Scenic
views
along
the
river
okay.
P
C
Thank
you,
I
I
do
have
two
items
that
I
need
to
address
ma'am,
so
it's
my
understanding
help
me
well,
let
me
help
me
understand
without
them
asking
for
a
height
increase,
in
other
words,
they're
staying
within
their
height
requirement
at
roughly
85
feet
and
with
no
increase
in
density.
Q
Q
C
Just
simply
saying
that
that's
all
amazing
yeah
thank
you.
Madam
chair
can
I
asked
Ben
Taylor
to
come
up
for
just
a
minute.
O
Sure
so
the
city
will
require.
Excuse
me
we'll
require
this
development
to
provide
a
traffic
impact
study,
and
that
will
include
everything
around
it,
so
that
will
include
the
projected
traffic
volume
from
the
Middle
Street
project
you
see
who's
folks
behind
me
are
developing.
It'll
include
that
traffic
and
all
the
expected
traffic
from
this
proposed
development
on
the
Wingfield
lot
and
all
the
existing
traffic
from
the
shopping
center
across
the
street
and
the
existing
apartment
complex.
C
O
Sure
I
think
Miss
ellenburn
shot
for
taking
this
to
my
attention.
I
did
not
realize
that
one
had
been
missed.
My
staff
has
been
fully
briefed
on
the
fact
that
I'm
here
today
having
to
explain
why
we
missed
something
and
they're
not
going
to
miss
it
again.
Okay,.
O
Prescribe
the
developer
hires
an
independent
third
party
to
do
a
traffic
impact
analysis
and
they
will
show
the
city
what
the
expected
impact
is
now
we
all
know
this
will
be
an
impact
on
traffic
that'll,
be
up
to
this,
my
department
to
my
division
of
transportation,
to
determine
if
the,
if
the
benefits
of
the
development
warrant
that
increased
capacity
of
traffic-
and
they
will
make
a
recommendation
to
this
to
you
folks
if
it
gets
to
that
point,.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
so
much
councilman,
Henderson
all
right
and
then
there's
a
two-minute
rebuttal
from
the
applicant,
and
there
was
a
question
about
parking
as
well
as
entrance
requirements.
F
One
of
them
was
a
transportation
study
is
the
first
one
that
was
mentioned.
We've
already
hired
a
transportation
engineer.
We've
taken
counts
before
in
the
past,
and
we
plan
on
taking
them
again,
so
diversity
of
housing
I
think
that
comes
from
the
beginning
of
the
form-based
code.
In
that
section,
it
talks
about
the
principles
of
form-based
code
principal
the
form-based
code
was
designed
to
provide
diverse
housing
types.
That
doesn't
mean
one
specific
piece
of
property
has
to
meet
all
of
the
different
types
of
housing
types.
F
It
that's
why
you've
got
different
sections
within
the
code
that
have
different
things:
some
for
single
families,
some
for
multi-family
conservation
of
Riverfront
options.
Obviously
we
want
to
preserve,
reserve
the
area
behind
one
North
Shore.
We
have
had
regular
meetings
with
the
city,
various
departments
about
connectivity,
about
preservation,
realignment
of
the
traffic
signal.
Councilman
Henderson
has
been
involved
with
those
accessibility
we're
trying
to
develop
a
neighborhood
where
people
can
walk.
We've
got
a
grocery
store
right
across
the
street.
A
Thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you,
everyone
for
your
your
information.
That
was
it.
That
was
the
two
minutes.
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you!
So
much
Council,
you
have
heard
of
the
presentation
you've
heard
from
the
applicant
as
well
as
opposition
today
we'll
be
voting
on
whether
we
will
uphold
or
overturn
the
form-based
code
form-based
code
decision,
that's
what
the
appeal
is
about.
A
It's
not
about
doing
anything
specific
with
the
project
just
based
on
solely
their
decision
to
have
to
approve
seven
stories
so
with
that
committees
that
the
committee's
decision
to
approve
seven
stories.
Thank
you
so
much
Phil.
So
a
vote.
Yes
means
that
we
uphold
that
decision
about
no
means
that
we
do
not
uphold
their
decision.
So
is
everybody
clear
on
what
the
vote
is,
what
it
stands
for,
what
it
means.
A
M
D
A
In
case
feel,
anything
I
missed.
S
C
You,
madam
chair,
when
I
think
about
the
best
use
for
riverfront
property,
it's
not
for
a
surface
parking
lot
and
I.
Think
we've
got
to
keep
that
in
mind
when
we
consider
this
decision
we've
already
heard
from
Mill
River
that
they
testified
that
it
did
not
negatively
impact
their
development.
A
Right,
okay,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
proper
second
any
comments
or
questions.
Okay,
all
in
favor
of
affirming
the
farm-based
code
decision
all
right,
I'll,
post
I
write
motion
passes.
That
means
the
appeal:
we
have
a
firm
form-based
code
decision
and
there'll
be
no
additional
action
from
Council
at
this
time.
So
with
that,
that's
that
ends
our
public,
our
public
hearing
and
for
those
who
are
here
for
the
hearing.
You
are
more
than
welcome
to
stay,
but
if
not
you're
welcome
to
leave
as
well.
A
A
A
All
right,
it's
the
applicant
present
is
there
any
opposition
prison
all
right,
councilman,
Henderson
yeah,
the
applicants.
C
Here:
okay,
thank
you,
madam
chair
and
I'm,
not
sure
I
know.
We
have
some
opposition
here,
probably
ready
to
talk
this
afternoon,
but
I
have
been
in
discussion
with
the
applicant
and
and
some
of
the
residents
in
fact,
and
we're
trying
to
come
up
with
maybe
a
solution
that
works
best
for
everybody.
I
am
going
to
make
a
motion
to
defer
this
until
October,
the
10th,
okay,
but
I.
Don't
know!
A
T
C
I
am
going
to
make
a
motion
to
amend
this
afternoon,
so
first
I
guess
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
all
right.
Okay
with
that,
I
want
to
ask
the
City
attorney
to
read
the
new
conditions
that
or
additional
conditions,
I
guess
as
it
may.
That
will
be
the
motion
to
amend.
Okay.
S
Yes,
sir,
and
and
based
on
the
presentation
we
saw
from
miss
renick
this
afternoon.
This
is
only
an
amendment
here
and
I'll
read
the
the
caption
just
so.
We've
got
it
correct
for
the
record:
an
ordinance
to
amend
Chattanooga
city
code,
part
2,
chapter
38,
zoning
ordinance
so
as
to
rezone
property
located
at
311,
Kelly's,
Ferry
Road
from
R1
residential
Zone
to
R3
residential
Zone,
subject
to
certain
conditions,
and
there
was
initially
some
discussion
about
C2,
which
is
off
of
the
agenda
currently
in
in
your
ordinance
here.
S
S
It
is
a
maximum
of
18
dwelling
units
on
the
property,
there's
no
access
to
Centro,
Street
Allowed,
no
vehicular
access,
easement
remaining
through
the
remaining
R1
property
to
North
Moss
Avenue
allowed
the
existing
church
building
will
remain
and
types
10,
foot
type
c
landscape
buffer
will
be
added
in
addition
to
the
street
yard,
and
only
single-family
homes
and
town
homes
will
be
allowed
on
the
R3
Zone
adjacent
to
Centro
Street
and
those
are
all
of
the
additional
conditions.
For
this
reason,
all.
A
It's
been
Motion
in
probably
second
we're
voting
on
the
amendment.
Any
comments
or
questions
all
in
favor,
all
opposed
motion
passes,
get
a
motion
move
as
amended.
Second,
all
right,
it's
been
motion
improperly,
second,
to
move
as
amended
comments
or
questions
all
in
favor.
All
the
pose
motion
passes.
Thank
you
so
much
councilman,
Henderson
metal
clerk
item,
C.
T
I
L
L
Okay,
I'm
gonna
read
the
purpose
statement.
The
intent
and
I
think
that
gives
some
guidance.
The
RN
zone
is
intended
to
accommodate
a
mix
of
higher
intensity,
multi-family
housing
options
and
a
pedestrian
friendly
environment.
Live
work
has
allowed
subject
to
standards
that
limit
the
extent
of
the
use,
and
then
the
single
unit
uses
are
permitted
two
unit
multi-unit
living
up
to
four
multi-unit
living
five
plus
there's
some
group
livings
permitted,
and
then
there
are
no
commercial
uses
except
a
day.
L
Care
is
permitted
by
I
think
it's
special
permit
for
the
board
of
zoning
appeals,
a
bed
and
breakfast
is
permitted
and
remote
off
street
off-site
parking
and
I
think
that's
related
to
use
is
permitted.
So
there
are
some
public
institutional
uses,
such
as
churches,
schools
that
you
would
find
kind
of
in
the
normal
zone
mix.
I
I
I
I
A
A
A
Right,
it's
been
motion
and
probably
second
any
common
questions
all
in
favor.
All
the
polls
motion
passes,
metal
clerk
item
e,
an.
T
A
A
Any
comments
or
questions
all
in
favor,
all
the
pose
motion
passes
metal
clerk
item
F
enormous.
T
Tubman
Chattanooga
city
code,
part
2,
chapter
38,
zoning
ordinance
so
as
to
Regional
property
is
located
at
5138,
51
44,
51
50
and
51
57
Strickland
Drive,
5422
old
Hixson
Pike,
and
an
undressed
parcel
in
the
5400
block
of
old
Hixson
Pike
from
our
two
residential
Zone
to
our
three
residentials
all
subject.
Certain
conditions.
G
Right,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you
Miss
renick.
Do
you
mind
coming
forward?
I
would
just
want
to
read
the
conditions
that
we
discussed
earlier
today
into
the
record.
Please,
there
are
two
in
particular.
I
was
very
concerned
about
as
far
as
egress
on
the
old
Hickson
Pike,
as
well
as
no
development
north
of
old
Hixson
Pike
between
that
and
the
creek
okay.
L
So
read
all
six
that
are.
L
The
ordinance
okay,
a
10,
a
tin
type,
c
landscape
buffer
I
think
that's
supposed
to
be
10.
Foot
type
c.
Landscape
buffer
shall
be
located
along
the
perimeter
of
the
development,
except
where
the
turnaround
is
provided
on
the
Strickland
Circle
alley.
Maximum
density
of
132
units
lighting
to
be
directed
away
from
all
residential
areas
and
Clubhouse
and
pools
shall
be
made
part
of
the
development
for
the
enjoyment
of
future
residents.
No
development,
permanent
north
of
old
Hixson
Pike,
except
for
Greenway
uses
and
driveway
driveway
location,
to
be
off
of
Old
Hixson
Pike.
L
G
I
know:
we've
had
we've
had
a
number
of
conversations
on
this
and
I've
gone
back
and
forth
with
with
concerns
from
residents
in
the
area.
What
is
your
stance
on
having
that
access
on
Old,
Hickson,
Pike
I,
know
currently
there's
a
driveway
right
right
there
is
that
required
in
this
development,
or
is
that
something
that
we
talked
about
coming
in
off
of
skill
learn
instead.
U
So,
currently,
our
plans
show
coming
in
off
of
skill
and
drive.
In
my
estimation,
coming
in
off
of
Old
Hixson
Pike
would
be
a
mistake
because
old,
Hicks
and
Pike
portions
of
it
fall
below
the
100
year
flood.
In
addition
to
that,
old
Hixson
Pike
is
fairly
narrow
versus
skillern,
which
is
of
a
sufficient
width
for
emergency
vehicles,
as
well
as
the
residents
coming
in
and
out,
and
it
keeps
traffic
closer
to
Hixson
Pike
and
coming
out
at
that
intersection
versus
pushing
it
back
more
into
the
residential
area.
U
So,
in
my
estimation,
I
would
actually
change
number
six.
Instead
of
saying
the
driveway
location
to
be
off
of
Old,
Hixson,
Pike
I
would
reverse
it
and
say
no
access
off
of
Old
Hixson
Pike
to
me
would
be
the
the
right
plan.
The
right
move
as
it
relates
to
this
development
and
to
protect
those
properties
that
are
off
of
Old,
Hicks
and
Pike.
L
Enemy
before
the
meeting
that
that
had
been
added
at
Planning
Commission
commission
noted
that
the
original
site
plan
that
showed
no
access
was
the
Prof
was
something
that
staff
supported
and
maintains
kind
of,
the
condition
that
we've
tried
to
keep
along
Old
Hixson
Pike,
which
is
to
reduce
the
number
of
access
points
to
commercial
properties.
So
staff
supported
the
fact
that
there
was
no
access
onto
Old
hicksburg.
Okay,
thank.
G
U
A
Okay,
it's
been
motion
improperly.
Second,
any
comments
or
questions
all
in
favor
to
move
to
approve,
as
amended.
A
Okay,
it's
in
District
Five.
Is
there
an
applicant
present
all
right
in
the
opposition
present
all
right,
councilman
Hester.
A
T
An
Earnest
to
amend,
Chattanooga
city
code,
part
2,
chapter
38,
zoning
ordinance
so
as
the
original
property
located
at
7283,
Bonnie,
Oaks
Drive
from
R4
special
Zone
with
conditions
and
R1
residential
Zone
to
C2
convenience
commercials
on
subject
certain
conditions.
All.
A
T
I
Madam
by
share,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
based
on
the
conversation
that
we
had
at
our
agenda
session.
This
is
in
your
district
and
it's
our
understanding
that
there
are
ongoing
conversations
with
the
community
I
move
to
defer
this
until
the
10th
of
October
right.
Thank
you.
Councilman.
T
In
order
to
amend
Chattanooga
city
code,
part
2,
chapter
38,
zoning
ordinance
so
as
threesome
properties
located
at
11,
15
and
11
17,
East,
14th
Street
and
an
unaddressed
property
in
the
1100
block
of
East
4th
Street
from
our
three
residences
on
our
RTC
residential
townhouse,
zero
lot
lines
on
with
conditions
to
rtz
residential
townhouse.
There
are
a
lot
lines
on
subject
certain
conditions
all.
A
N
A
N
N
A
T
A
Sarah
applicant
present
all
right
in
the
opposition
president,
okay,
that
is
in
District,
eight
again
Madam.
N
Chair
I
am
on
this
deferred
train
tonight,
so
I'm
going
to
move
to
this
firm
until
September
19th,
but
I
did
speak
to
Mr
Jones,
and
this
is
due
to
a
language
barrier.
The
person
I
needed
to
translate
for
me
was
sick
with
covet,
so
I'm
gonna
defer
until
then.
Second.
A
A
Right,
the
applicant
present
standing
opposition
present
all
right.
This
is
in
districts.
Eight
and
nine
councilwoman
Conrad
confirm
until
October
the
10th
all
right,
councilwoman
Noel.
N
A
A
A
All
right,
the
motion
is
properly.
Second,
any
comments
or
questions
all
in
favor,
I'll
pose
motion
passes
medal
clerk
item.
Oh.
T
A
T
A
N
A
A
Okay,
it's
the
applicant
present
in
in
the
opposition
present
all
right.
This
is
in
District
9..
All
right
got
a
motion
and
proper
second
any
comments
or
questions.
All
in
favor
all
opposed
motion
passes.
We
made
it
to
resolutions
I
write
Council.
If
there
are
no
objections,
we
would
like
to
take
items
a
through
e
as
a
group,
if
there
are
any
of
the
objections,
just
hit
your
life,
all
right,
metal
clerk,
a
through
e,
please.
T
Item
a
and
resolution
authorized
in
the
mayor
to
enter
into
a
Brownfield
voluntary
agreement
with
the
Tennessee
Department
of
environment
and
conservation
tdet.
It's
essentially
the
former
test
for
the
property
property
at
159
ham.
Road
further
identified
as
tax
map
number
135027.03
for
the
payment
of
fees
that's
outlined
in
the
agreement
for
an
amount
not
to
exceed
three
thousand
dollars.
T
For
Findlay
Stadium,
volunteer
and
event
staff
parking
item
e
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
or
it
says,
need
to
enter
into
an
interlocal
agreement
with
Hamilton
County
on
behalf
of
the
Hamilton
County
Sheriff's
Office,
to
provide
safe
and
stable
housing
by
establishing
and
operating
a
housing
navigation
source
to
serve
individuals
with
complex
needs
experiencing
homelessness.
All.
A
T
A
resolution
authorizing
Visions
to
the
employee
information
guy
EIG
to
be
affected
upon
approval
revisions
include
policy,
one
purpose
and
objective
policy:
two
general
policies:
policy
for
personnel,
human
resource
records
policy,
6
outside
employment
and
policy;
a
separation
of
employing
and
authorizing
formatting.
A
table
of
contents
updates.
A
Right
all
right,
it's
been
motion
and
properly
second,
any
comments
or
questions
all
in
favor
all
right.
All
the
toes
motion
passes
if
there's
no
objection
from
Council
and
if
so,
please
hit
your
like
we'll
take
items
G
through
I
as
a
group
with
G's
alternate
version.
A
T
G
resolution
approving
a
new
special
exceptions
permit
for
an
existing
liquor
store
located.
That's
I'm,
sorry.
You
said
the
alternate
version.
Let
Me
begin
that
again,
her
resolution
approved
a
new
special
acceptance
program
before
an
existing
liquor
store
located
at
6032
Highway
153,
Chattanooga,
Tennessee,
37343,
subject:
certain
conditions
item
I
at
resolution
authorized
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga
to
apply
for
and
if
awarded
except
they
reconnected
communities
a
neighborhood
program
planning
right
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Transportation
for
feasibility
studies
for
implementing
the
transportation
project.
A
S
A
Right
Council
item
h,
I'm
here:
Joe
Cruz,
councilman,
Ledford.
M
Madam
clerk
can
I
ask
if
the
applicant
is
present
please
and
if
there
is
any
opposition
present.
Okay,
Karen
I'd
like
to
see
a
full
presentation.
Please.
L
Okay,
we
went
over
this
briefly
at
Council.
This
is
a
excuse
me
at
committee
this
afternoon.
This
is
a
request
for
a
special
permit
for
residential
plan
unit
development,
a
PUD
at
1619,
Gray
Road.
The
original
proposal
was
for
31
single-family
detached
Lots
with
Frontage
is
less
than
60
feet
and
wet.
L
The
property
is
sound.
R1
the
yellow
on
the
screen
is
the
R1
property.
There
is
zoning
on
Jenkins
Road
that
allows
for
a
little
bit
higher
density
and
you're
picking
up
a
piece
of
that
on
the
Eastern
side,
and
that
in
that
brown,
shade,
The
Gray
Road
in
this
area
is
R1
and
there's
been
no
recent
zoning
history
for
the
site
and
based
on
the
existing
R1
residential
Zone
I.
L
Think
I
noted
this
at
committee
that
our
staff
report,
that
said
the
site,
could
permit
a
lot
yield
of
about
38
dwelling
units
I,
think
that
seems
a
little
bit
High
based
on
the
lot
square
footage,
but
we
just
noted
the
actual
yield
might
be
a
little
less
by
the
time.
Infrastructure
is
installed
surrounding
development
form
on
Gray
Road,
a
single
family.
Excuse
me
single
unit
residential
lot
sizes
range
from
about
0.2
acres
to
nine
acres
in
size.
L
These
are
larger
Lots
on
Gray
Road,
the
I'm
just
showing
the
100
and
500
year,
floodplain
that
runs
along
the
rear
of
the
property.
There's
some
discussion
about
that
in
the
staff
report
and
then
in
the
staff
recommendation.
L
Staff
noted
that
the
site
is
located
in
the
area,
11
East
Brainerd
plan.
The
plan
identifies
the
site
of
suburban
residential
Place
type,
which
includes
single-family
detach
as
the
primary
use
density
in
the
Suburban
residential
Place
type
can
range
from
three
to
ten
units
per
acre,
but
this
is
a
PUD.
This
is
a
planned
unit.
Development.
The
underlying
zoning
is
what
controls
the
density
for
the
property.
L
The
area
11
plan
notes
that
area
residents
expressed
a
high
level
of
concern
about
flooding,
and
the
plan
provides
some
recommendations,
so
I
think
I
mentioned
previously.
There
are
four
or
five
bullet
points,
with
real
specific
recommendations:
I'm
just
summarizing
that
includes
preserving
land
for
natural
storm,
water
management,
Wildlife
wildlife,
habitat
and
clustering
homes,
on
similar
on
smaller
lots
to
minimize
overall
impacts.
L
The
staff
found
the
proposed
single
unit
detached
development
compatible
with
the
Suburban
residential
Place
type
and
recommend
staff
recommended
a
condition
related
to
development
beyond
the
flood
plain
to
ensure
compatibility
with
their
11
plan
goals,
so
staff
is
recommending
approved,
with
condition
with
no
residential
lots
allowed
west
of
the
hundred
year.
Flood
plain
there's
quite
a
bit
of
opposition
present.
Just
to
summarize
concerns
about
water,
runoff,
Gray,
Road,
being
a
cut
through
just
the
amount
of
traffic
and
overcrowding
in
the
area,
the
road
conditions
and
then
flooding.
L
So
the
applicant
had
come
with
some
conditions
that
had
been
worked
been
worked
on
prior
to
Planning
Commission
Planning
Commission
found
that
the
request
with
conditions
is
compatible
with
the
area,
11
plan
development
form
and
adjacent
land
uses.
This
comes
with
a
Planning
Commission
recommendation
to
prove
the
residential
prud
with
conditions.
As
listed
there.
The
seven
conditions
listed
on
the
screen.
U
Thank
you
and
if
you
could
pull
up
the
site
plan
currently
as
presented
Karen,
who
was
more
technologically
advanced
than
I,
certainly
am
thank
you
Mike
Price
MIP
Engineers.
So
we
did
have
a
rather
spirited
community
meeting
regarding
this
particular
case
and
afterwards,
I
was
able
to
meet
with
several
of
the
individuals
that
were
at
that
meeting
and
through
that
we
looked
at
developing
some
conditions
that
we
thought
would
help
ameliorate
and
sort
of
address
the
concerns
of
those
residents
in
the
area.
U
They
are
the
seven
conditions
that
were
approved
to
Planning
Commission
and
to
essentially
summarize
those
we
wanted
to
try
to
create
a
landscape
with
a
fence
there
along
the
front
to
create
a
nice
entrance
as
it
relates
to
coming
into
the
development.
And
then
we
looked
at
widening
the
lots
to
a
minimum
of
55
feet
in
width
to
60
feet.
We
reduced
the
number
from
31
to
27.
U
We.
Basically,
if
you
really
boil
it
all
down
where
the
sticking
point
came
in,
is
they
wanted
both
a
fence,
the
one
resident
that
has
basically
tried
to
represent
the
area?
He
wanted
a
fence
and
trees,
and
what
we
stated
is
look.
We
have
done
all
of
these
items.
We
produce
density.
We
agree
to
planting
trees,
we're
going
to
do
the
Landscaping
along
the
front.
We've
eliminated
accessory
dwelling
units
as
it
relates
to
density
and
your
concerns
there.
U
U
In
fact,
if
you
look
at
the
the
main
individual
that
has
been
in
opposition
to
this,
his
garage
faces
us
we're
not
putting
garages
facing
him
so
I
think
by
planting
trees
and
by
doing
the
items
that
we've
agreed
to,
we
have
bent
over
backwards.
We've
shown
Mr
Esa,
who
is
looking
at
doing
this
development?
Who
is
a
good
builder
in
the
area
that
he
is
more
than
willing
to
do
whatever
he
can?
U
That
makes
sense,
as
it
relates
to
putting
conditions
on
the
development,
but
there
comes
a
point
where
it's
like
that's
just
a
bridge
too
far,
so
we
asked
to
stick
with
the
seven
conditions.
We
think
that
we
have
more
than
adequately
addressed
the
concerns.
His
home
sits
the
resin
to
the
north
of
some
45
feet
off
the
property
line.
The
resident
to
the
south
of
us
is
90
feet
off
the
property
line.
The
resident
to
the
north
has
6.2
Acres.
We
have
the
property
of
the
South,
has
eight
and
a
half
acres,
I.
U
Think
one
of
the
conditions
also
he
wanted
was
that
we
wouldn't
put
any
houses
on
the
back
side
of
the
creek.
Well,
that's
over
600
feet
from
his
house,
I
mean
how
far
do
we
have
to
be
away
from
being
able
to
put
houses?
You
know
away
from
him.
I,
don't
understand
what
the
impact
is
600
feet
from
from
someone's
home.
So
with
that,
we
would
just
simply
ask
that
the
conditions
as
approved
a
Planning
Commission,
which
all
the
opposition
was
there
and
heard,
and
I
thought
we
were
really
moving
in
a
good
direction.
U
M
Thank
thank
you,
madam
chair.
You
know
what
I
will
defer
to
councilman
Smith
and
then
follow
up.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
G
U
U
What
we
have
stated
is
we
will
plant
trees,
as
shown
on
the
plan
which
begins
there
at
Gray
Road
and
continues
back
essentially
to
when
we
hit
our
community
lots,
and
so,
in
other
words,
wherever
we've
got
houses
backing
up
to
our
neighbors,
we're
screening
them
we're
just
not
wanting
to
put
in
a
fence.
Okay.
Thank
you,
sir
thank.
M
All
right
here
we
go
Mike,
so
I
have
a
couple,
quick
questions.
If
you
can
go
back
a
few
slides,
I'm
interested
in
the
flood
plain,
okay,
so
I
understand
it
is
not
illegal
to
build
in
the
floodplain
matter.
Of
fact,
I
want
to
go
across
the
street
that
caught
my
eye:
16
14,
16,
18,
16,
24,
1700
1704.
Those
look
like
they're
all
in
a
flood
plain.
M
Okay,
that's
that's
kind
of
interesting,
so
the
next
I
want
to
talk
about
is
by
right.
Okay,
by
right,
you
can
build
how
many
houses
all.
U
Right
today,
under
the
current
zoning
you
roughly
can
put
in
about
24
25
homes,
thereabouts
with
accessory
dwelling
units.
M
U
Talking
with
Gus
in
terms
of
the
type
homes
that
he's
looking
at
constructing,
he
does
not
see
that
accessory
dwelling
units
are
going
to
be
a
component
of
these
particular
homes.
These
will
all
be
singular
structure.
There
won't
be
any
separate,
Standalone
garages.
Everything
will
be
encompassed
in
the
home
itself,
so
we
don't
really
see
accessory
dwelling
units
as
being
a
part
of
this
development,
as
we
are
currently
proposing.
It
will.
U
I
do
not
believe
based
upon
the
plans
I've
seen,
that
would
be
Gus's
plans
if,
for
some
reason,
this
were
to
be
denied
and
then
he
would
have
to
look
at
an
alternative
plan,
then
that
might
end
up
being
on
the
table.
Okay,.
M
My
next
question
is:
let's
go
forward
a
few
in
the
conditions.
Let's
talk
about
the
sticking
point,
so
one
of
those
is
the
flood
plain,
which
you
say,
that's
a
no-go
for
your.
M
U
The
other
thing
I
would
point
out
is:
if
you
look
at
your
drawing,
you
see
the
blue
line,
which
is
the
center
line
of
the
creek.
You
then
have
a
dashed
line,
which
indicates
the
current
100
year
flood
plane
through
there,
and
you
see
that
essentially
the
creek
buffer
and
the
100
year
flood
other
than
on
the
southern
portion
of
that.
One
lot
essentially
runs
right
with
this
with
the
stream
buffer,
and
so
it.
U
M
U
Given
this
area,
especially
on
the
east
side
of
Gray
Road,
where
people
have
seen
flooding
up
and
down
through
that
area,
so
if
you'll
notice,
we
do
show
the
two
blue
areas
which
we
show
would
be
Retention
Ponds,
which
we
would
deal
with
both
water
quality
as
well
as
quantity,
and
so
we
will
be
obviously
addressing
storm
water
runoff
and
not
increasing
the
runoff
onto
our
neighbors
and
by
law.
You
can't,
although
you
can't
I
mean
it
does
happen,
but
by
law
you
cannot
that's
correct.
Are.
M
Let
me
go
to
next
question
is
in
the
meeting
we
had
talked
about.
Obviously,
the
width
of
Gray
Road.
Are
you
widening
Gray
Road
in
front
of
the
or
making
any
improvements
to
turn
Lanes.
U
U
M
The
next
phase
includes
the
residents,
and
that
is
to
have
them
petition
or
sign
off
on
speed,
deterrent
humps
to
basically
make
that
Gray
Road,
not
so
appetizing
and
if
anything
I
think
that
was
a
win
out
of
of
meeting
for
for
three
plus
hours
and
listening
and
working
through
some
things.
It
just
proves
what
we
can
do
together
and
I.
Think
that's
great,
because
we
will
get
that
25
miles
an
hour.
We
will
get
speed
humps
if
everybody
still
wants
them.
M
If
they
don't
want
them,
then
that's
you
know,
that's
up
to
them,
but
I'm
willing
to
push
for
it
and
have
already
pushed
for
the
20
25
mile
an
hour,
speed
limit
to
try
and
keep
that
from
being
a
cut
through
and
more
of
a
resident
or
a
Speedway
as
as
I
travel
that
road,
quite
frankly,
myself
a
lot
and
I'd
travel
25,
because
it's
not
safe
really
any
any.
More
than
that.
M
Tell
me
about
the
conversation
we
covered.
The
back
lot
tell
me
about
the
conversation
between
the
fence
and
the
trees,
because
right
now,
I
see
trees
and
I
see
trees
in
the
conditions
coming
out
of
PC
and
I
understand
that
it
is
desired
to
have
trees
and
a
fence
but
I'm
also
seeing
or
trees
in
your
conditions.
Can
you
walk
me
through
that?
A
little
bit
more
so.
U
We
agreed
to
the
to
the
trees
and
we
said
that
we
would
plant
those,
and
so
what
has
occurred
is
there
was
a
continued
request
to
put
in
a
fence
and
since
you
only
have
a
25
foot
backyard
and
you
plant
trees
and
it
put
a
fence
in
those
particular
close
proximities.
The
trees
will
grow
into
the
fence
and
it
creates
a
unmanageable
untenable
situation,
as
it
relates
to
the
residents
being
able
to
to
do
that.
U
So
what
we
said
is
that's
just
not
something
that
we
can
do
so
we
think
that
planting
trees
is
the
better
of
the
two.
If
individuals
as
they
come
along
and
are
building
their
homes
in
through
their
one
offense,
then
they
can
certainly
do
that.
But
we
just
didn't
think
that
that
placing
a
fence
was
really
a
necessary
item
that
needed
to
occur
as
a
result
of
this
development.
So.
M
M
I
A
question
as
we
looked
at
this
during
planning
and
zoning
committee,
the
condition
to
not
allow
accessory
dwelling
units
was
interesting
to
me.
I
You
know
that
something
that,
as
the
city
we're
looking
at,
how
we
can
increase
density
in
a
low
impact
way,
and
you
make
the
point
that
these
Lots
aren't
going
to
they're
not
going
to
be
separate
structures
for
garages,
but
our
accessory
dwelling
unit
ordinance
includes
interior
accessory
dwelling
units,
so
above
a
garage
for
example,
or
or
around
the
back
of
the
house
to
be
able
to
create
a
mother-in-law,
Suite
granny
flat,
a
college
apartment
for
a
child.
So
it
concerns
me
that
that
we
would
take
that
right
away
from
these
R1
homeowners.
I
U
Gonna
let
the
opposition
answer
that
question,
because,
honestly,
we
didn't
see
an
issue
with
it,
but
at
the
meeting
it
was
certainly
one
that
there
was
no
one
in
the
room
as
it
relates
to
opposition.
That
was
a
four
letting
us
do
that.
So
we
just
simply
said
fine
look
to
try
to
again
cross
the
the
Gap
that
we've
got
between
what
we're
proposing
and
what
the
the
residents
are
asking
will
eliminate
that.
But
from
my
standpoint
it
is
not
it's
not
a
major
issue
from.
V
A
Right
all
right,
thank
you.
So
much
Mike,
okay,
we're
here
from
the
opposition,
can
I
get
nine
minutes
on
the
clock.
Please.
K
Thank
you,
members
of
the
city
council,
Scott
bergfeld
1625,
Gray,
Road
I'm,
the
property
owner
immediately
adjacent
to
the
north.
Just
as
an
aside
since
we
ended
with
the
Adu
question,
I'll
go
to
that
first
I,
don't
remember
anybody
from
the
neighborhood
talking
about
adus
or
bringing
that
up.
That
was
brought
up
by
the
developer
as
a
proposed
concession
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
red
herring
for
the
reason
you
noted
that
you
know
most
people
if
they're
going
to
do
a
mother-in-law,
Suite
above
a
finished
garage.
K
That's
part
of
the
attached
house
I,
don't
know
that
anybody
in
the
neighborhood
raised
any
issue
about
that
I.
Don't
remember
that
comment
being
made
so
I,
don't
know
how
exactly
the
Genesis
of
that
came
up.
Thank
you.
It's
probably
a
good
idea
to
not
have
an
Adu
there,
but
I.
Don't
remember
that
being
a
big
issue.
The
big
picture
here
is
that,
right
now
this
is
an
area
that's
been
devastated
by
the
tornado.
K
People
have
been
going
through
many
years
of
reconstruction,
I've
been
reconstructing
for
three
and
a
half
years
to
move
in
next
weekend
from
the
April
2020
tornado.
The
road
at
the
proposed
development
site
is
17
feet.
One
inch
wide.
This
Mr
Price
admitted
that
under
the
international
fire
code
and
the
standards
that
apply
to
the
subdivisions,
the
minimum
width
of
a
road
is
22
feet.
K
So
it's
17
feet
wide
all
the
way
across
and
I
heard
just
now
for
the
first
time
that
they're
actually
going
to
widen
the
road
a
little
bit
at
the
very
entrance
to
the
site.
But
we
have
people
run
off
the
road.
All
the
time
I
mean
just
recently,
because
someone
was
driving
a
trailer
doing
nothing
wrong,
driving
in
the
dead
center
of
his
Lane
being
very
careful,
but
that
school
bus
or
that
MARTA
bus
or
that
trailer,
that's
hauling.
K
A
skid
steer
and
all
the
other
construction
equipment
is
going
to
be
coming
out
of
this
site.
For
the
next
three
and
a
half
years,
Mr
Price
said
it'd
be
through
2026
is
dangerous
and
I
got
run
off
the
road
three
weeks
ago
and
nobody
was
doing
anything
wrong.
It's
just
a
dangerous
road,
so
the
opposition
that
was
at
that
three-hour
meeting
was
unanimous.
K
100
of
the
people
on
Gray
Road,
which
right
now
only
has
34
residences
and
on
this
one
six
acre
lot
where
you
would
nearly
double
the
number
of
residences
on
the
road
by
adding
27..
So
there's
a
significant
policy-based
concern
about
that.
We
were
kind
of
presented
with
the
idea.
Well,
this
is
going
to
get
approved
as
kind
of
a
done
deal.
You
know,
your
best
bet
is
to
argue
for
conditions,
and
so
we
did.
K
We
had
some
meetings
with
the
developer
and
with
his
engineer
and
some
discussions
that
were
helpful,
but
our
argument
was
essentially
this
city
council
should
follow
the
planning
staff
recommendation,
because
a
putt
is
essentially
like
a
package
group
of
variances
right.
You
get
exceptions
to
the
road
Frontage
requirement,
you
get
exceptions
to
the
lot
size
requirement,
and
you
do
all
this
on
the
idea
that
the
city
council
will
impose
conditions
that
mitigate
the
impact
of
that
development
that
higher
density
development
than
what
you
would
normally
get.
K
If
you
just
did
R1
watts,
and
so
our
argument
was
the
staff's
recommendation
to
not
build
in
the
Hundred
Year
floodplain
and
it
floods,
terribly
I
sent
pictures
to
councilmember
Ledford
just
to
show
how
bad
this
was
in
recent
days
with
our
heavy
flooding,
our
heavy
raining
and
flooding
in
August.
So
follow
the
staff
members
recommendations,
the
city
staff
planning
recommendations
about
not
doing
any
development
in
the
flood
plain
or
to
the
west
of
the
flood
plain.
K
I,
don't
think
is
accurate.
He
said
they're
going
to
add
a
vegetation
buffer,
not
true
they're,
going
to
take
out
a
bunch
of
trees.
The
few
trees
that
are
remaining
post-tornado
they're,
going
to
take
those
out
for
those
three
houses
in
the
back
at
the
west
side
of
the
property
only
to
leave
a
10-foot
vegetation
buffer,
that's
pre-existing
so
they're
removing
what
few
trees
we
have
and
leaving
10
foot
of
vegetation,
but
they're,
not
adding
a
vegetation
buffer.
And
so
our
argument
is
follow.
K
The
staff
recommendation
stop
it
at
those
houses
that
are
being
screened
and
then
wherever
the
extent
of
the
allowable
development
is
so,
if
you
follow
the
staff
recommendation,
that
would
go
back
about
seven
or
eight
hundred
feet
to
and
stop
at
the
entrance
to
the
100
year.
Flood
plain,
if
you
don't,
wherever
the
extent
of
the
allowable
development
is
mitigate,
the
impacts
of
the
development
with
screening
and
with
trees.
K
Screening
provides
the
Privacy
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
provides
the
Privacy
for
the
new
homeowners
that
are
coming
and
the
people
who
have
invested
their
lives
for
many
years
and
and
live
there
on
the
lot.
The
second
thing
is
the
security
fans
are
an
aluminum
fence,
not
an
expensive
thing,
but
an
aluminum
fence
the
entire
length
of
the
allowed
area
of
development.
If
it's
to
the
all
the
way
back,
then
do
the
fence
all
the
way
back.
K
K
It's
not
shown
on
this
picture,
but
my
driveway
runs
for
700
feet
along
the
other
property
line,
I'm
concerned
about
little
children,
young
children,
dogs,
darting
out
out
of
these
backyards
and
they're
almost
immediately
in
driveways,
and
so
that's
the
that's
the
concern
that
we
have
about
the
fence.
So
the
big
picture
here
is.
K
Wherever
there
our
house
is,
and
so
that's
those
are,
the
sticking
points,
I
will
say
they
came
back
and
they
said
well,
if
you
let
us
build,
if
we,
if
you
allow
us
to
do
the
fence
and
you
can
get
trees
by
the
way
that
go
up
instead
of
out
and
not
crowding
the
fence.
You
just
have
to
plan
for
that
with
your
landscaper,
but
he
said
if
you
want
to
put
the
trees
on
your
property
and
he
said
to
Mr
fryer.
K
K
K
Last
thing,
I'll
say
is:
this
is
a
phenomenon
that
within
1800
feet
as
the
crow
flies,
we
have
250
houses
being
added
at
Heritage
point
we
have
a
new
commercial
development
behind
the
wall
fall
house
at
Jenkins
and
East
Brainerd
Road.
What
was
recently
approved
I
believe
was
a
church
and
school.
An
institution
further
down
Gray
Road
at
1725.,
plus
we
have
all
the
development
I
go
Gap
and
the
340
homes
that
are
going
at
the
Cigna
site,
where
they're
doing
the
school
and
a
bunch
of
elements.
So
we
have
an
overburden
infrastructure.
K
That's
a
common
theme.
Everybody's
heard
that
before
that's
nothing
new,
but
for
this
particular
site,
we're
just
asking
follow
the
staff
recommendation
and
wherever
the
extent
of
the
allowed
development
is
please
mitigate
the
impacts
of
the
development
as
a
putt
is
designed
to
do
through
the
screening,
trees
and
the
FEDS
I
know
I've
taken
up
most
of
my
time,
but
I'm
available
for
any
questions
that
Council
might
have.
K
K
Well,
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
overstate.
I!
Think
the
predicate
to
the
question
is
a
little
bit
incorrect,
because
when
you
look
at
the
floodplain,
the
area
of
allowable
development
is
a
lot
less
than
what
than
what
this
shows
right,
because
you're
losing
about
two
acres
like
I've,
always
understood,
I
can't
build
back
there.
There's
a
TVA
power
line.
All
that,
so
I
can't
build
back
there
and
I've
never
thought
that
I
could.
What.
M
K
K
M
K
The
preference
would
be
that
this
high
density
development
would
be
denied.
Now,
let
me
let
me
qualify
my
question
my
answer,
because,
yes,
that
would
be
the
the
goal
for
the
Pod
to
be
denied,
because
it
would
prevent
a
lot
of
these
problems
now
you're
saying
well
what
if
they
build
everything
that
R1
allows
I,
don't
think
that's
going
to
happen,
because
otherwise,
why?
Wouldn't
he?
Why
we're
here,
seeking
a
special
exceptions,
permit
for
a
putt
right
I
think
that
most
the
maximum
potential
economically
out
of
the
property
is
upon,
and
so
I
think.
M
That's
what
I'm
trying
to
get
to,
because
you
hear
me
out
because
I
know
what
you
want.
You
want
to
win
and
I
want
I
want
you
to
win.
I,
want
everybody
to
win
at
some
point:
someone's
gonna
build
on
that
property.
Now,
what's
going
to
happen,
probably
in
the
next
12
months
and
I'm,
going
to
call
Mr
Anderson
up
here
right
now,
but
what's
going
to
happen,
is
our
zoning
code
is
going
to
change
and
I
guarantee
you
and
I
promise?
M
M
That
is
a
elimination
for
us
to
be
honest
with
you.
It
doesn't
require
a
card
and
I'm
at
the
city
by
the
time
it's
said
and
done
it's
probably
going
to
be
somewhere
close
to
five
thousand
square
feet
and
that's
and
we're
working
through
that
right
now,
with
our
consultants
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
tell
you
that,
because
it's
a
great
fear
of
mine
that
in
24
months
they
just
sit
on
it
and
they
come
back
and
they
say
we
don't
need
your
pod.
M
K
Council,
member
Ledford
I'm,
okay,
with
what
the
law
allows,
but
I
need
to
say
that
from
the
August
7th
meeting
forward,
which
I
think
was
Spirited
is
a
good
way
to
put
it
because
the
opposition
was
Universal
from
the
current
residence
is
that
we
were
presented
with
a
proposition
that
the
Pud
would
be
approved
and
focus
on
the
conditions.
And
so
what
I
came
here
tonight?
I
spent
very
little
time
talking
about
the
the
extent
of
the
opposition,
because
I
thought
from
and
taking
what
you
said.
K
Face
value
which
I
have
every
reason
to
understand,
with
your
experience
that
the
public
get
approved.
So
we're
here
to
say,
the
staff
recommendation
of
no
development
in
the
flood
planner
to
the
west
of
it
was
a
sound
recommendation
and
if,
if
whatever
the
extent
of
allowed
development
on
the
side
is
provide
for
the
screening
trees
and
the
fence
to
mitigate
the
impacts
that
the
pub
would
engender
and
I
just
I've
been
working
on
that
from
that
proposition.
For
the
last
month.
From
what
from
what
you
told
us,
was
sort
of
a
done
deal.
K
M
Was
valuable,
I
know
it
wasn't
heard
very
loud,
but
it
is
advice
and
I
do
have
an
ear
to
the
ground
and
I'm
worried
and
and
I'm
worried
that
I'm
worried
that
it's
not
a
putt.
It's
not
controlled
by
these
parameters.
It's
not
controlled
by
these
regulations,
then
at
some
point,
somebody's
going
to
be
really
mad
and
I'm
going
to
go.
Well,
that's
what
you
want.
K
Council,
member
Ledford:
that's
why
I'm
here
focusing
on
the
conditions,
so
we
would
ask
that
the
conditions
by
staff
be
employers.
A
A
All
right
all
right.
Well
all
right
becomes
a
question
all
in
favor.
All
opposed
motion
passes
all
right
and
I
had
Madam
chair,
yes,
councilman
I.
M
Apologize,
we
did
not
allow
the
applicant
his
two
minute
rebuttal-
oh
okay,
in
the
exchange
there.
So
maybe
I
asked
for
at
least
two
minutes
to
be
reinstated.
Please
all.
U
Thank
you
so
I
know
you've
already
taken
a
vote.
I
don't
know
if
you
would
reconsider,
but
here's
what
I
would
say.
U
The
person
in
opposition
said
he'd
take
staff
recommendation
and
the
staff
recommendation
doesn't
have
any
trees
doesn't
have
any
buffering
at
all.
All
it
simply
did
is
eliminate
three
houses
600
feet
away
from
his
house
now.
So
he's
telling
me
telling
you
it
sounds
like
that.
He's
perfectly
fine
with
no
trees,
no
fence
just
simply
approved
staff
conditions
with
the
same
number
Lots,
just
don't
put
them
600
feet
from
my
house.
U
I,
don't
understand
how
it
is,
then,
that
what
we're
proposing
instead
is
to
put
buffering
against
his
property
and
could
create
those
type
of
conditions
that
one
would
want
to
build.
Six
hundred
thousand
dollar
homes,
I
I,
just
I'm
floored.
That
Council
would
want
to
deny
a
development
of
this
type
given
what's
being
proposed.
This
doesn't
devalue
his
property.
U
This
is
certainly
an
amenities
in
the
package
with
what's
being
put
together.
They
can
only
be
an
asset
to
the
city
of
Chattanooga
into
the
East
Brainerd
area.
I
I'm,
just
I'm,
just
trying
to
just
understand,
put
my
head
around
what
I'm
hearing
and
what's
being
being
done
is
it
relates
to
council
action.
I
I,
understand
the
frustration
as
it
relates
to
one
individual
who
has
really
been
the
the
spearhead.
The
point
of
the
spirit
throughout
this
this
process
in
trying
to
really
I
think
overly
State.
U
M
Thank
you,
sir
Mike
I.
In
response
to
that,
the
onus
is
on
the
community.
They
don't
want
this
they're
willing
to
accept
it.
That's
what
I've
heard
what
comes
down
the
pipe
I
don't
expect
to
see.
Mr
berthal
come
before
Council
complaining
about
anything,
because
that's
that's
exactly
what
they
want
and
if
you
go
in
there
and
there
is
no
there
is
you
don't
have
to
that's
the
way
these
things
the
Pud
was
a,
but
they
don't
want
it
and
they
don't
want
it
and
they
want
to
go.
M
H
I,
just
this
is
interesting:
yeah
yeah,
I'm,
looking
for
God's
sake,
what's
the
difference
in
what
you
can
do
by
right
right
now
in
the
pod.
U
H
U
Anything
well
not
to
do
any
of
the
items
that
we've
considered,
we'll
probably
just
sit
and
wait
to
the
council
to
make
changes
as
it
relates
to
the
R1
and
then
we'll
come
in
with
a
plan
with
no
conditions
and
move
forward.
Based
on
that
I
mean
it's.
It's
I
think
we
all
recognize
it's
a
matter
of
time.
We
were
simply
just
trying
to
get
ahead
of
the
curb
but
put
conditions
that
ameliorated
those
those
those
situations.
A
I
Mike,
if
you,
if
you
do
decide
to
sit
and
wait
for
greater
density
allocations,
I
would
ask
that
you
think
about
building
much
smaller
homes
with
adus
I
think
we
need
some
some
real
variety
of
housing
in
that
area
and
that
could
be
a
beautiful
neighborhood.
We.
I
A
M
A
A
W
Good
evening
we
have
14
purchases
recommended
for
approval
this
evening.
I
will
go
as
fast
as
possible.
Thank
you.
First
from
the
Street
Maintenance
division
of
Public
Works.
This
is
a
new
blanket
contract
for
reinforced
concrete
pipe.
This
will
be
a
four-year
agreement
not
to
exceed
220
000
per
year.
The
solicitation
was
advertised
six
times
with
no
bids
received
the
seventh
attempt
to
produce
one
bid.
The
award
will
go
to
Foley
Products
company
as
the
best
and
only
bid
for
the
city
of
Chattanooga
next
from
the
Street
Maintenance
division
of
Public
Works.
W
These
are
two
new
blanket
contracts
for
concrete.
This
will
be
a
four-year
agreement
not
to
exceed
400
000
per
year.
This
solicitation
was
advertised
three
times
with
no
bids
received.
The
fourth
attempt
could
reduce
two
bids.
The
awards
will
go
to
Ready
Mix,
USA
and
Tennessee
concrete
LLC
as
the
best
bid
for
the
city
of
Chattanooga.
Next
from
the
Fleet
Maintenance
division
of
Public
Works
is
a
one-time
purchase
of
two
John
Deere
5090e
mowers
with
Alamo
Brahma
attachment
for
street
cleaning
in
the
amount
of
195
thousand
dollars.
W
This
purchase
will
utilize
Source,
well
contract
number
070821-agi.
Also
from
Fleet
Management
division
of
Public
Works,
this
is
a
one-time
purchase
of
one
2023
International
in
the
607,
with
brush
hog
knuckle
boom
and
grapple
truck
for
the
water
quality
division.
This
purchase
in
the
amount
of
188
906.68
will
utilize
sourceful
contract
number
zero,
six,
zero,
nine
two
zero
Dash
nvs
next
from
the
Fleet
Management
division
of
Public
Works.
This
is
a
one-time
purchase
of
two
2025
Kenworth
t380
with
a
brush
hog
for
Street,
managed,
Division,
Street,
Maintenance
division.
W
Next
from
Fleet
Management
division
of
Public
Works,
this
is
a
new
blanket
contract
for
police
interceptor
and
special
service
Vehicles.
This
will
be
a
four-year
agreement
not
to
exceed
three
million
dollars
per
year.
We
received
one
bid
and
re-advertised.
No
other
bids
were
received.
The
award
will
go
to
Ford
of
Dalton
as
the
best
and
only
bid
for
the
city
of
Chattanooga
last
one
from
Fleet
Management
division
of
Public
Works
is
an
increase
of
73
375
dollars
to
a
previous
purchase
with
Ford
of
Dalton,
which
was
ordered
in
April
of
2022
for
175
975.
W
The
increase
is
due
to
the
model
year
price
adjustment.
The
new
price
total
will
be
249
350
dollars
next
from
public
works.
This
is
a
new
blanket
contract
for
traffic
Street
Paint.
This
will
be
a
four-year
agreement
not
to
exceed
85
000
per
year.
The
lowest
bidder
was
not
considered
for
the
award
due
to
past
performance.
The
award
will
go
to
in
a
splint
as
the
best
bid
for
the
city
of
Chattanooga
next
from
Wastewater.
W
This
is
a
one
month:
contract
extension
with
Source
Technologies
LLC
for
a
liquid
liquid,
calcium
nitrate,
to
allow
the
department
to
time
to
enter
the
needed
requisition
for
recompetition.
No
additional
funds
are
being
added
at
this
time,
also
from
Wastewater.
This
is
a
new
blanket
contract
for
the
supply
and
delivery
of
liquid
oxygen.
This
will
be
a
four-year
agreement
not
to
exceed
325
000
dollars
per
year.
Bids
were
received
from
one
vendor.
The
invitation
was
re-advertised
and
resulted
in
no
additional
bids.
W
The
award
will
go
to
maths
and
try
gas
next
from
the
Chattanooga
police
department.
This
is
the
purchase
of
one
refurbished
F6B
system,
including
refurbished
F6B
robot
vehicle
for
the
use
for
the
for
use
by
the
China
Grove
Police
Department
bomb
squad
unit
for
the
amount
of
124
957
dollars
and
two
cents.
The
vendor
is
Safeware.
Inc
in
this
purchase
will
utilize
Omnia
contract
four:
four:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight
four
six,
eight
next
from
Human
Resources.
This
is
a
new
blanket
contract
for
flexible
spending
accounts.
W
This
will
be
a
four-year
agreement
not
to
exceed
five
hundred
fifteen
thousand
dollars
per
year.
The
lowest
bidder
did
not
meet
minimum
requirements.
The
award
recommendation
will
go
to
Total
administrative
Services.
Corporation
is
the
best
bid
for
the
city
of
Chattanooga
from
the
Department
of
Technology
services.
This
is
a
sole
source
three-year
blanket
contract
with
granicus.
Three
products
are
being
renewed
in
the
granicus
blanket
gov
QA
for
the
office
of
City
attorney
boards
and
commission
management
and
address
verification
for
stvr
compliance.
W
I
A
W
We
have
one
sole
source
purchase
to
report
from
Wastewater.
This
is
a
purchase
from
Perkins
Elmer
for
a
laboratory
instrument,
service
agreements
and
the
amount
of
36
180.75
Perkins
Elmer
is
the
only
approved
source
for
Perkins
Elmer
repair
parts
and
the
only
source
authorized,
supervised
service
and
installation
for
instrumentation
manufactured
and
sold
by
perkinelmer.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
So
much
Brooke,
We've
Come
to
committee
reports,
councilman
rod.
A
J
I
Vice
chair,
thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
do
have
a
report.
The
affordable
housing
committee
met
today
where
we
received
a
report,
a
presentation
on
a
market
value
analysis
that
will
help
the
city,
council
and
the
city
help
determine
where
and
how
Chattanooga
can
invest
in
affordable
housing,
production
and
preservation
for
greatest
impact.
We
will
have
a
work
session
as
a
city
council
on
October
3rd.
It
will
be
at
two
o'clock,
it
will
be
in
our
conference
room
and
the
public
is
welcome
to
attend
yeah
two
o'clock.
A
Thank
you,
madam
Vice,
chair
Phil,
you
got
announced.
You
got
an
announcement.
S
Just
one
item
here
there's
been
a
background
investigation
and
Zoning
check
here
for
Hilltop
bottle
Inc.
That
was
the
one
that
you
had
a
request
for
for
a
special
exceptions.
Permit
the
applicant
has
not
have
any
convictions
that
would
bar
him
from
operating
that
location
in
this
location
complies
with
all
restrictions
under
the
zoning
ordinance
and
it's
for
60
32,
Highway
153,
and
that
has
been
approved
by
this
body.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
So
much
now
comes
time
for
people
who
wish
to
address
the
council.
If
you
would
like
to
address
the
council,
please
line
up
behind
this
Podium
and
Phil.
Could
you
read
the
read
the
rules
I
will
so.
S
X
Right,
thank
you
all.
For
your
time
my
name
is
Joshua
David
capelis
I'm,
an
advocate
for
unsheltered
Citizens
and
Chattanooga
and
Veterans
across
this
great
state
of
Tennessee
service
is
defined
as
the
action
of
helping
or
doing
work
for
someone
or
something.
We
also
have
a
purpose
on
this
Earth
for
some
it's
to
serve
others
and
for
others
it
is
to
be
served.
Etiquette
and
service
is
the
most
delicate
balance
of
discovering
needs,
while
simultaneously
being
expected
and
able
to
meet
those
needs,
especially
with
respect
to
Public
Service.
X
A
person
who
serves
known
as
a
service
person
is
said
to
have
a
servant's
heart
or
a
heart
of
gold.
Gold
is
considered
a
valuable
rare,
Earth
mineral,
and
we
affectionately
describe
things
of
value
with
the
prefix
of
gold
when
making
a
point
of
special
priority.
A
golden
hour
is
a
light
of
a
sunrise
or
Sunset.
Our
golden
years
are
those
that
some
cherish
most
a
high
reward
for
hard-working
people.
X
A
golden
age
is
a
period
of
time
that
people
lived
in
and
experience
great
prosperity
and
some
say
that
it's
right
now
for
Chattanooga
and
Americans,
if
you're
a
modern
day
minor
searching
for
hearts
of
gold.
Where
would
you
look
where
would
you
find
them
among
who?
What
groups
of
people
serve?
Selflessly
nurses,
doctors,
police
people,
firefighters
veterans,
pastors
volunteers,
teachers
and
social
workers?
X
These
are
a
few
of
the
many
titles
Americans
Revere
as
nodal
Noble
and
honorable
found
right
here
in
Chattanooga
Tennessee
yesterday
on
September
11th,
we
chattanoogan's
experienced
a
once
in
a
lifetime
opportunity
to
Welcome
Home,
Captain,
Larry,
Taylor
and
honor
the
selfish
sacrifices,
which
earned
him
the
Medal
of
Honor
for
his
actions
of
Vietnam
nearly
55
years
later,
he
was
recognized
for
his
bravery,
and
we
Americans
are
eternally
grateful
for
his
service.
The
parade
and
ceremony
was
the
best
and
most
memorable
experiences
of
my
life
and
I
want
to
thank
everyone
who
participated
and
attended.
X
X
Find
homeless
veterans
in
Chattanooga
and
we
need
to
be
able
to
serve
them
with
the
same
love
and
honor.
We
do
all
veterans,
it
is
our
duty
to
honor
their
sacrifice
to
our
country
through
our
services
to
them,
and
thank
you
to
the
city
of
Chattanooga
for
the
partnership
with
the
Hamilton
County
Sheriff's
Office
to
better
serve
unsheltered
citizens
in
Chattanooga.
Last
I
was
aware,
there's
about
57,
homeless
veterans
and
if
we
call
it
Captain
Larry,
he
might
show
up
at
this
Cobra
helicopter
and
rescue
him.
X
So
leadership
is
the
rarest
action
to
manifests
from
the
ideation
of
mankind
we
step
out
into
public.
We
bear
witness
to
the
standards
of
others
and
not
our
own.
When
we
act
in
good
faith,
we
are
right
in
our
own
mind,
I
believe
it
is
our
duty
to
exemplify
fair
and
equal
citizenry
for
a
peaceful
democracy,
centered
on
Liberty
fairness
and
Justice
according
to
high
morals,
principality
and
mercy
upon
thy
fellow
human
beings
and
I'll
end
with
this.
The
best
we
can
do
to.
I
V
Okay,
I
was
trying
to
give
him
chance
to
do
what
he
had
to
do.
I
didn't
want
to
come
up
there.
Thank
you
so
very
much.
My
name
is
Edward
green
as
green
with
the
knee
on
the
end
Junior
I'm,
a
resident
of
District
9
came
in
once
before
last
month.
I
think
Mr
attorney
to
ask
for
bylaws
and
and
some
guidance
for
our
appeals
and
sign
Department.
We're
about
to
elect
some
officers
in
that
particular
department
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
these.
V
V
Secondly,
I'd
like
to
know
who
I
contact
there's
a
pothole
at
the
intersection
of
Chamberlain
and
Wilcox,
my
car
sustained
damage
to
the
mud
flap
on
the
driver's
side
of
my
vehicle
and
secondly,
my
mother
wants
to
know
she's
88
if
there's
a
department
that
she
can
refer
to,
that
can
assist
her
with
trying
to
get
Windows
for
her
home.
If
anybody
can
address
those
issues.
For
me,
I
would
greatly
appreciate
it.
I
have
a
minute
and
20
seconds
left
for
somebody
to
respond
to
me.
Thank.