►
From YouTube: City Council Agenda Session 01-15-19
Description
City Council Agenda Session 01-15-19
A
You
look
in
your
packet,
you
do
see
a
list
of
items,
but
we've
already
covered
those
items
in
last
week's
meeting
and
I'm
sure
mr.
Bridger
does
not
want
to
go
through
those
again,
and
neither
does
anyone
up
here
so
we
have
sufficiently
covered
those
and
I
appreciate
you
working
through
that
John
is
our
I
just
set
the
tone.
Real
quick
is
our
goal
today,.
A
B
A
C
Basically,
we
cover
three
topics:
I
just
fought
them.
The
accessory
dwelling
unit
got
rust
toward
the
end.
Y'all
were
getting
hungry,
I.
Think
it's
getting
close
to
dinnertime,
so
I
want
to
be
sure
to
kind
of
cover
some
of
that
a
little
bit
and
then
hit
on
steep
slopes.
Flood
plains
just
give
you
the
update
on
the
power
project
with
that
and
then
give
you
a
briefing
on
the
c2
special
permit
that
you
indicated
y'all
are
in
developing
as
a
new
tool.
So
those
are
the
three
items.
C
C
First
excelling
dueling,
you
know,
ordnance
I
know
we
kind
of
really
blazed
through
that
pretty
fast
and
I
think
the
two
things
I
heard
is
we
gonna
make
sure
you
have
ample
time
for
public
review
and
feedback,
but
also
to
give
you
opportunity
as
council,
to
review
the
ordinance
and
give
us
some
feedback.
So
then
we
come
back
to
you
as
a
body.
We
can
have
a
conversation
about
what
you
like,
or
don't
like
about
the
current
draft
of
the
orders,
but
I
think
to
be
able
to
have
that
conversation
in
a
formal
way.
C
You
need
to
have
the
draft
order
to
look
at
so
what
we're
going
to
do
is
I
might
have
Emily,
send
you
all
the
draft
ordinance
so
that
you
all
can
be
looking
at
it
and
think
about
ask
ask
questions
of
us
of
staff.
The
other
thing
we
want
to
do
is
we
have
another
public
hearing,
so
we
actually
have
a
pretty
light
caseload
at
our
February
Planning
Commission
meeting.
D
D
E
C
C
We've
met
with
residents
individually
as
well
as
development
interests
individually.
So
we've
done
what
we
can
through
the
context
and
resources
we
have.
We
thought
when
our
other
option
would
be
is
we
could
do
a
more
broadly
publicize.
We
can
put
an
ad
in
the
paper
about
a
public
hearing
in
February
to
give
additional
stakeholders
an
opportunity
to
give
feedback
before
we
come
back
to
you,
but
yeah
I
think
I'm,
not
sure
what
else
we
could
do.
Above
and
beyond
that,
within
the
resources
we
have
as
a
staff.
D
C
D
Possible
to
get
a
questionnaire
out
to
those
presidents
to
let
them
pull
their
neighborhood
associations
or
have
week
we've
done
that
done.
We've
actually
done
that
reason.
I
say
that
is
because
I'm
well
at
least
two
that
were
made
on
a
pretty
regular
basis.
It
was
never
mentioned
in
any
of
the
that
I
can
run
right
from
the
president.
Any
of
the
neighborhood
associations
about
any
kind
of
rice.
F
Council,
so
the
our
PA
maintains
a
listserv
of
all
the
Neighborhood
Association
presidents,
so
I
sent
emails
and
letters
to
95
registered
presidents
with
the
information
about
the
project
linked
to
our
website
and
asked
them
to
distribute
it
to
all
their
neighborhood
association
members.
So,
aside
from
I
guess
knocking
on
doors
I
as
John
said,
I,
don't
know
what
other
ways
we
could
do
that.
So
if
they
didn't
distribute
that
information,
then
I
think
that's
out
of
the
RPAs
hands.
G
G
Is
this
on
yeah
yeah
I
too,
was
worried
by
the
sample,
as
as
you
know,
because
you're
usually
going
to
hear
just
from
the
people
that
were
on
it
for
some
reason
and
and
they
should
have
that
right
to
do
that-
I'm
wondering
if
you
thought
about
doing
it
a
different
way.
Instead
of
going
that
route,
good.
C
G
Would
love
for
you,
instead
of
us
being
presented
something
by
you
like
I,
suggested
before
I
would
love
a
session
with
you
all
right
so
that
we're
not
put
in
the
position
of
correcting
or
changing
what
you
come
up
with?
I
think
that
that's
something
like
this
should
be
organic
and
that
it
should
come
from
a
meeting
with
from
of
us
with
you
and
have
us
talk
about
the
various
concerns
that
we've
got
like
I
think
the
dwelling
units
can
be
fine
when
you
lob
something
out
there
and
we
have
to
respond
rather
than
react.
G
I
would
love
to
be
in
the
position
of
pro
acting
right
and
when
you
put
us
in
the
position
of
reacting
like
I,
could
pro
act
if
I
had
a
meeting
if
I
met
with
my
folks
in
the
various
neighborhoods
I've
heard
nothing
from
my
neighborhoods
about
that
lots
of
times
they
go
in
the
round
file.
We
think
everybody
just
lives
on
email.
They
don't.
C
G
Wish
they
did,
but
they
don't
as
far
as
research
is
concerned,
so
I
think
if,
if
you
had
an
educational
meeting
with
us
all
of
us,
perhaps
in
strategic
planning
or
something
like
that
and
listened
to
the
various
concerns
we
have
and
not
just
commit
assume
aside
and
think
that
we're
going
to
come
a
certain
way
or
another.
It
would
be
very,
very
helpful.
It's
really
hard
to
constantly
be
putting
in
the
position
of
reacting
when
we
could
be
sitting
around
a
table
collaborating
and
coming
up
with
something
from
the
front
end.
A.
C
G
A
Chair
I,
thank
you,
dr.
burrs
I'm,
seeing
no
other
lights
on
a
tea
hue
discussion.
John.
Let
me
add
this:
we've
had
pretty
extensive
discussion.
This
is
a
growing,
very
popular
item
throughout
the
country.
I've
seen
it
starting
the
West,
Coast
and
Florida
and
moving
its
way
all
around,
and
it
does
I
think
have
the
potential
to
I
mean
solve
a
lot
of
housing
shortage
problems.
I
think
it's
a
great
tool
for
keeping
families
together
and
having
the
capability
to
have
an
in-law
or
an
aging
parent
in
place
or
whatever
your
family
needs.
I.
A
Think
it's
wonderful,
I,
think
it's
a
wonderful
idea.
I
do
and
express
concerns
about
this
type
and
some
of
the
regulations
and
I
think
if
it's
okay
with
the
council
I
feel
like
we
need
a
little
bit
to
to
piggyback
on
dr.
verses
comments.
We
need
a
little
bit
more
education
on
what
exactly
an
ad
you.
Okay
is
number
one
number
two,
some
real-life
scenarios
using
maybe
real-life
properties
as
an
example
for
us
to
see
how
this
may
work
and
that
way
we
can,
as
a
council,
maybe
visualize
a
little
bit
better.
A
The
pros
and
the
cons
to
to
to
a
neighborhood
I
have
to
say
also
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
we
only
got
170
folks
back
yeah,
responding
to
our
I
mean
it
kind
of
feels
like
no
one
cares
yep,
and
this
is
pretty
big
impact
to
properties
and
neighborhoods
when
we
started
building
additional
units,
so
I
think
we
need
probably
a
little
bit
more
education
on
this.
If
the
council
agrees,
so
we
could
wrap
our
heads
around
this
a
little
bit
more
so.
C
Soon,
so
do
we
one
option
to
council
one
versus
just
a
strategic
planning
session?
Would
you
like
us
to
come
by?
We
could
kind
of
Emily
put
together
a
kind
of
overview.
Last
time
it's
been
a
while
since
you've
seen
it,
but
we
could
kind
of
bring
that
back
to
make
sure
we're
all
it's
fresh
again.
What
a
a
tu
is
and
how
different
examples
of
how
it's
working
in
Chattanooga
and
do
that
in
strategic
planning
and
maybe
have
a
conversation
on
I
call.
It
hopes
and
fears,
meaning.
Here's
what
we
like
to
see
happen.
C
G
A
G
C
Right
it'll
be
a
discussion
that
be
a
very
brief
context
again,
just
make
sure
we're
familiar
with
what
it
is
we're
talking
about
in
terms
of
just
ad
use,
then
it'll
be
a
discussion.
Dialogue
amongst
council
will
make
throw
some
questions
for
y'all
to
kind
of
stimulate
the
conversation,
but
it'll
be
a
conversation
as
I
understand
it
kind
of
based
on
what
you
understand
about
it.
What
would
you
like
to
see
and
what
are
maybe
some
concerns
that
could
go
wrong
unless
you
might
have
might
be
worried
about
thank.
A
H
C
D
A
A
C
C
Both
have
unique
aspects
to
them
that
require
some
careful
thought
and
consideration,
and
you
want
to
have
folks
bring
in
both
a
perspective,
those
who
actually
are
in
the
developed
business,
but
also
who
could
be
impacted
by
what
happens
in
developed,
so
we're
thinking,
clearly
residents
and
end
developers
and
development
professionals,
but
and
I
think
it's
an
opportunity
for
them
to
also
to
communicate
with
each
other.
So
they
can
understand
here,
hear
each
other
and
understand
from
each
other's
perspective,
for
us,
the
staff
also
to
learn
from
that.
C
So
that's
the
thing
that
one's
like
a
focus
group,
but
it's
it
is
not
a
decision-making
group.
I
want
to
be
clear
about
that
staff
will
be
using
that
input,
in
addition
to
some
public
meetings
that
we're
going
to
have
during
the
process
to
inform
some
potential
strategies
and
options
that
will
present
you
all.
C
As
counsel
and
just
to
kinda,
let
you
know-
we've
gotten
basically,
five
residents
and
five
builders
and
professionals
and
one
real
estate,
a
legal
technical
person,
Mike
Mallen,
so
we
got
the
the
residents
filt
play:
James
have
urn
Bob,
Geyer,
Tim,
McDonald
and
Jim
Johnson
builders
and
develop
professional
zhh.
We
have
Chris,
maybe
he's
a
builder
and
Planning
Commission
member
Mike
croc,
sole
jason
farmer,
who's,
a
realtor
and
pc
member
Donna,
Anna
man,
engineer
and
Micah
Duffy
who's,
an
engineer,
and
so
again
that's
just
all
that
is,
is
a
sounding
board.
C
C
We
will
be
kicking
off
our
advisory
committee
right
now.
We
have
one
tentatively
for
this
week
from
this
coming
Friday
during
the
period
of
January
to
March.
We're
really
focused
on
identifying
the
challenge
to
understand,
what's
going
on
currently
with
steep
slopes
and
floodplains,
as
well
as
framing
those
values
and
principles
that
inform
how
we
think
about
evaluating
this
potential
strategy.
So
we'll
be
having
a
public
forum
either
toward
the
end
of
February
early
March,
depending
on
when
we
get
the
analysis
done,
because
it's
important
before
we
have
that
forum.
C
At
least
you
got
some
good
information
to
talk
about
and
have
a
conversation
about,
so
we
want
to
get
the
analysis
done
first,
as
far
as
documenting
the
current
situation
with
steep
slopes
and
floodplains.
So
once
that's
done,
we
will
have
a
public
forum
to
talk
about
again.
What
are
the?
Why
are
we
addressing
this
problem?
What
we
hope
to
accomplish?
What
are
we
worried
about
kind
of
the
same
thing,
hopes
and
fears?
What
we'd
like
to
see?
C
So
once
we've
got
a
clear
understanding
of
the
problem
and
our
core
values:
how
we
approach
the
problem,
we'll
begin
to
frame
some
potential
strategies
will
be
again
meeting
with
our
visor
committee
on
a
monthly
basis
would
be
also
updating
you
as
a
council
monthly
and
then
have
another
public
forum
sometime
in
again
late,
April
early
May,
to
get
the
community's
feedback
on
the
strategy.
So,
as
we
frame
here
some
potential
paths.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
You
know?
Is
there
a
path
that
that
seems
to
make
more
sense
for
you
as
a
citizen?
C
So
once
we
get
all
that
feedback,
then
we
will
develop
a
formal
report.
That'll
include
the
analysis
that
was
done,
the
strategies
that
were
considered
and,
of
course
our
recommendation
is
staff,
but
you
will
also
see
all
the
other
strategies
that
were
considered.
So
you
have
opportunities
Council
to
choose
a
strategy
you
think
makes
them
fits
best
for
the
city.
So
and
then,
once
you
direct
us
from
that
report,
the
particular
tool
to
develop
will
build
the
tool.
C
A
B
A
E
Thank
you
actually
got
a
comment
and
two
questions.
One
question
would
be:
is
there
anything
in
your
planning
timeline
that
would
allow
this
body
to
take
a
look
at
some
of
the
mistakes
we've
made
in
the
past
actual
subdivisions?
Yes,
that
we
really
allow
something
to
happen
that
really
screwed
something
that's.
C
Part
of
the
assessment
that
first
phase
is
analyzing,
what's
working,
what's
not
with
our
current,
so
we'll
look
at
what
are
some
of
those
problem
sites
and
why
so
try
understanding
of
what
are
the
gaps?
What's
what
so,
as
you
know,
how
you
frame
the
solution,
is
it's
largely
in
part
how
you
frame
the
problem?
So
so,
yes,
we
are
going
to
look
at
and
if
you
have
any
particular
sites
that
you
think
fit
that
bill,
I
encourage
you
to
send
that
to
Brian's
attention,
and
it
will
certainly
take
a
look
at
those
okay.
E
E
There,
somewhere,
all
right
and
and
and
the
next
thing
would
be
a
comment
and
you've
picked
your
group,
it
looks
like
you
might
have
to
alter
it
a
little
bit
for
the
sake
of
public.
Yes
in
the
future,
I
would
like
to
certainly
see
more
sexual
and
racial
diversity
on
a
group
like
this,
because
that's
what
Chattanooga
is
and
I.
H
E
I
saw
one
female
and
not
sure
any
african-americans
or
Hispanics,
so
I'm,
please,
please,
and
if
you
need
counsel
help
I,
please
will
do
I
mean
I
know.
I
gave
you
the
name
of
Jim
Johnson
because
yeah,
he
would
probably
you
know,
put
a
pistol
in
his
mouth
if
he
didn't
get
on
this
committee,
but
but
we'll
try
to
do
better
job,
helping
you
with
that.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
You
John
and
I'm
gonna
back
up
a
little
bit
with
what
Chancellor,
Mitchell
I
would
definitely
be
interested
in
going
on
a
field
trip
that
he,
you
know
the
effects
of
the
results
of
some
of
the
ordinances
that
some
of
these
other
cities
have
passed
and
I'm
I'm.
Assuming
that
would
happen
sometime
in
January
marks,
I
thought.
C
They'd
be
more
than
framing
strategies,
because
I
think,
if
you're
trying
to
think
about
potential
strategies,
I
would
think
it'd
be
in
the
April
May
segment,
because
if
you
weren't
trying
to
see
what
communities
like,
if
they're
doing
this
strategy,
you
want
to
see.
How
is
that
right?
How
is
that
particular
strategy?
Actually
work
and
playing
out
and
the
ground?
Is
that
a
fair
okay,
yeah.
D
C
Think
that's
kind
of
because
you
were
looking
at
potential
best
practices
that
we
might
want
to
consider
implementing.
As
a
city
I
said,
I
think
with
a
pure
City
visit
with,
because
then
you
can
see
okay,
they
took
this
particular
type
of
strategy
or
tool
and
applied
it.
How
well
did
it
work
or
not?
Mr.
B
D
B
C
A
G
B
B
G
B
G
C
C
C
A
Thank
you
dr.
burns,
seeing
no
other
lights
John
before
we
wrap
up
this
piece.
I
want
to
tell
a
story
from
Planning
Commission
be
about
40
minutes,
okay,
councilman
now,
in
all
seriousness,
this
was
very
encouraging.
Yesterday,
yesterday
we
were
given
a
proposal:
I
won't
name
the
projects
or
what
district.
But
what
was
interesting
was
listening
to
the
engineer
and
the
developer
really
talk
about
steep
slopes
really
talked
about,
staying
away
from
them
being
more
conscious
and
I
thought.
A
That
was
interesting,
because
I
think
this
conversation
that
we're
having
is
helping
I
think
it's
helping
bring
an
awareness
and
I
think
it's
being
helpful,
and
it
was
interesting
because
in
two
years
of
sitting
on
the
Planning
Commission
I've
not
really
heard
that
attention
being
given
verbally
to
the
terrain
and
and
protection
and
and
I
think
that
it's
important
to
note
and
it's
fun
to
share
with
everybody
that
I
felt.
That
was
a
good
thing.
A
That's
happening
and
I'm
glad
we're
talking
about
this
and
engaging
so
many
different
aspects
and
I
agree
with
Councilman
Mitchell,
maybe
even
a
little
bit
more
aspects
if
we
could
fit
some
some
other
dimensions
to
this.
So
I'm
excited
I
appreciate
you
guys
got
a
lot
of
work
going
on.
You
got
area,
12,
you're,
wrapping
up,
you've
got
area
3
that
you're
starting
off
and
80
use
and
a
plethora
of
other
things.
A
So
thank
you
for
you
and
your
staff
for
the
hard
work
that
you're
getting
and
putting
into
this
and
I
appreciate
it
and
I
think
we're
going
to
make
some
some
really
good
recommendations.
We're
gonna
make
move
Chattanooga
forward,
we're
gonna,
do
it
responsibly
and
we're
gonna.
Do
it
together,
so
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
that.
Thank
You,
council,
chairman
Smith,
I,
see
your
light.
Yes,.
C
C
Are
we
talking
about
the
c2
special
permit,
yep
yeah?
We
would.
This
will
go
to
Planning
Commission
if
y'all
are
comfortable
it
in
February
and
then
would
come
back
to
y'all.
For
you
know,
final
action
and
I
was
gonna
kind
of
give
you
a
quick
overview
of
what
the
basic
tool
regulates:
okay,
okay,
sure,
so
just
accounting
Ellis
frame
the
problem.
C
What
we
heard
that
the
concern
was
the
need
for
a
zoning
tool
that
would
consider,
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
the
location
of
a
contractor
office
and
equipment
storage
in
his
own
other
than
m1
and
m2.
Currently
right
now,
the
way
the
zoning
code
set
up
you
either
need
to
m1
or
m2
to
have
that
use,
and
so,
if
the
question
becomes,
if
we're
okay
with
the
use
but
not
the
zone,
is
there
a
better
zone
tool
option?
So
the
idea
is,
you
would
create
a
special
permit
in
a
c2
zone.
C
Now
we
all
have
think
of
that.
You
know
commercial
corridor
in
your
in
your
community.
You
know
the
Hicks
and
Pikes
bringing
a
road
Ross.
The
boulevard
right,
there's
different
parts
of
those
corridor.
Some
of
them
have
more
of
a
retail
nature
right
and
some
of
them
have
more
of
a
a
light
manufacturing
or
storage
right
capacit
to
it.
So
what
this
tool
will
enable
you
to
do
is
say:
okay,
if
the
particular
area
is
already
has
some
contractor
related
businesses
in
the
area,
and
it
makes
it
fits
in
that
block.
C
Then
there
is
a
special
permit
that
you
could
apply
for
within
the
situ,
so
do
not
have
to
zone
to
m1
or
m2
to
permit
that
use,
but
it's
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
So
that's
the
premise
of
the
tool.
The
components
would
include.
We
cluding
to
have
a
definition
of
what
that
is.
It's
always
important
have
good
definitions
and
the
enforcement
process
to
have
a
definition
clue
would
add
a
special
permit
option
the
c2
zone.
C
We
would
add
some
information
requirements
for
the
application
so
that
we
can
evaluate
how
it
compatible
it
is
with
the
surrounding
land
uses
as
well
as
criteria
so
and
then.
Finally,
we
have
some
standards
because
clearly,
even
if
you
have
contractors
storage,
you
may
not
want
to
have
the
entire
site
be
outdoor
storage
right.
It's
supposed
to
be
accessory
to
not
a
not
a
primary
storage
area,
because
then
you
have
a
de
facto
junkyard
right.
C
I,
don't
think
that's
the
intent,
so
there
would
be
some
standards
for
the
storage
and
then
there's
an
important
thing
to
note.
There
is
some
language
currently
in
situ
that
deals
with
contractors,
offices
and
outdoor
storage,
and
so
we
get
to
make
sure
when
we
create
this,
that
it
doesn't
conflict
with
some
of
the
existing
standards
in
the
c2
zone.
So
just
know
that
those
are
the
kind
of
elements
that
we
would
put
into
a
draft
ordinance
that
would
go
before
PC
and
then
still
show
up
at
y'all's
Dyess
for
review
before
it
becomes
law.
C
H
H
We
certainly
don't
want
to
open
up
a
problem
for
for
other
CTS
around
and
and
you've
you
do
have
it
addressed
that
it's
very
specific
to
certain
aspects
of
the
business,
some
outdoor
storage
and
then
I
believe
a
total
number
of
employees,
potentially
that
are
there
a
lot
on
the
spot
and
it's
based
to
based
also
on
similar
businesses
in
the
area
that
that
may
be
operating
this
way,
so
I
appreciate
that
prior
to
going
planning
can
I'd
like
to
see
a
draft
of
it,
sir.
Prior
to
that,
if
you
would
I'm.
A
I
C
Is
how
you
define
contractors,
business
and
storage?
So
sometimes
you
say
what
it
is
and
what
it
isn't.
So
we
can
specifically
exclude
junkyards
to
be
clear
about
that.
The
second
would
be
in
the
standards,
the
standards,
if
you
limit
the
scale-
and
it
has
to
be
I-
think
the
the
way
our
current
draft
reads.
It
has
to
be
associated
with
the
operations
of
the
business.
So
so,
if
you
get
any
kind
of
outdoor
storage,
it
has
to
be
part
of
the
product
that
you're
making
or
distributing
from
your
property.
C
I
F
C
I
C
To
be
on
the
same
property,
the
way
I've
got
it's
written
knows
you
can't
say:
I
got
my
business
on
this
property
over
here
in
my
storage
is
over
here
to
another
property.
The
way
we've
got
developed
that
would
not
fly
because
that's
a
stand.
That's
a
separate
property
over
here,
even
though
it's
associated
this
property
over
here
for
our
purposes,
because
your
business
is
not
located
here.
That's
just
that's
a
does
not
would
not
meet
that
definition.
So.
I
C
I
C
C
C
E
You
let
me
go
one
step
further.
Councilman
I
got
an
HVAC
business.
Okay
and
I've
just
replaced
a
model
from
a
house,
put
a
brand
new
in
there
and
got
this
old
one
and
it's
part
of
my
business
because
it's
an
HVAC
unit,
so
I'm
gonna
go
put
it
out
in
that
area
right.
So
it's
a
worthless
piece
of
junk,
but
it's
part
of
my
business.
E
C
That
well
I'm
again,
partly
that
I
guess
the
the
other
way
you
tighten
this
up.
Is
you
limit
the
amount
of
air
you
can
use
on
your
property
for
any
kind
of
storage?
So
you
can't
use
the
entire
property
for
storage
and
it
has
to
be
screened
and
then
whatever
it
gets
approved.
As
you
know,
this
is
just
a
starting
point.
There
could
be
additional
conditions
that
Council
adds
as
part
of
the
review
of
any
special
permit
for
this.
So
it's
not
a
guarantee
you're
going
to
get
it.
C
You
have
to
get
through
the
public
process.
You
can
put
additional
restrictions,
as
deemed
appropriate,
is
review,
like
any
other
zoning
case,
but
again
the
way
this,
as
I
understand
the
intent,
is
not
to
create
the
junkyard
the
intent
is
to
have
if
you
get
any
outdoor
stores
related
to
the
equipment
you
use
for
operating
your
business
or
materials
that
it's
its
accessory
to
it's,
not
a
primary
part
of
the
property
and
it's
screened.
C
D
Well,
talking
about
some
regulations
on
the
story,
I
guess
junk
or
outdated
equipment
on
our
I
know
on
our
tire
ordnance,
you
could
you
can
display.
If,
if
you
have
a
used
tire
business
and
you're
displaying
tires
for
sale,
you
can
have
them
out.
I
think
you
know
out
of
a
enclosed
area
if
they're
being
discarded,
they
have
to
be
in
a
different
area.
C
C
I
keep
well
I
do
want
to
say
this
caveat
because
I
know
there's
another
angel
in
my
ears,
my
LDO
staff,
not
mine,
but
our
LD
o
staff
partners,
whatever
we
craft
needs
to
be
enforceable,
and
so
we
just
need
to
be
careful
not
make
its
it
easily
clear
for
enforcement
purposes,
but
not
so
complicated
that
it
becomes
hard
for
them
to
enforce.
So
I
will
be
consultant
directly
with
our
team
to
make
sure
that
we
have
something.
That's
workable,
very.