►
From YouTube: City Council Agenda Session 06-02-20
Description
Agenda Session
Human Resources Committee
Planning and Zoning Committee
Note: Due to a clerical error, the first few minutes of the minutes were not recorded.
A
You
know
it's
certainly,
if
that's
a
requirement
of
the
hamilton
county,
medical
people,
if
it's
required,
yes,
sir,
we
would
require
it,
we
would
comply
with
their
guidelines.
B
Very
good,
that's
all
I
have
for
the
captain.
Thank
you
chairman.
Thank
you
captain.
Thank
you,
sir.
C
A
Councilman,
thank
you.
So
much
council
persons
just
greatly
appreciate
the
support
and
we
really
want
to
move
forward.
We
got
to
move
forward
and
I
see
this
event
as
a
step
to
move
us
forward
as
a
as
a
city
as
a
community,
and
we
just
we
just
can't
stand
still
absolutely.
Thank
you,
sir.
Yes,
sir.
Thank
you
all
all.
C
C
Oh,
I
do
now
donna
mr
knoblet.
E
Yes,
sir,
I
was
just
raising
my
hand
simply
to
stay
in
there.
We
drafted
a
license
agreement
and
paragraph
11
13
of
that
license.
Agreement
specifically
requires
him
to
follow
those
rules
and
regulations
that
the
health
department
would
have
in
effect
and
if
there's
any
new
executive
orders
based
upon
changes
that
may
occur
between
now
and
july,
the
11th,
which
is
the
first
time
that
this
would
be
allowed,
would
have
to
be
complied
with.
At
that
point,
there's
also
a
requirement
to
file
a
plan
with
our
folks
in
open
spaces.
E
C
D
Resolution
authorizing
the
acceptance
of
federal
emergency
management
agency
and
tennessee
emergency
management
agency
funds
administered
by
the
united
states
department
of
homeland
security,
major
disaster
declaration,
tennessee,
severe
storms,
tornadoes
straight-line
winds
and
flooding.
Dr
4541
incident
period
april
12
2020
to
april
13
2020
declared
on
april
24th
2020
to
repair
damage
from
recent
tornado.
F
Yeah
daisy
just
a
clarification
for
my
colleagues.
This
is
for
us
to
accept
funds
from
tema
and
fema.
There
are
other
resolutions
coming
up
further
that
have
to
do
with
fema
and
and
tima
that
relate
to
the
reading
of
the
budget
or
the
approval
of
the
budget.
Can
you
explain
how
those
coordinate.
G
Okay,
like
you
said
this
is
a
resolution
that
authorizes
us
to
accept
money
from
tima
and
fema
for
the
tornadoes
later,
hopefully,
on
the
16th,
we
will
have
a
budget
amendment
that
appropriates
the
city's
matching
share
of
those
for
those
projects
which
is
12
and
a
half
percent
of
the
total
amount.
G
So,
and
that
will
happen
and
has
already
happened
in
this
current
fiscal
year
and
of
course
it
wasn't
anticipated,
so
we
are
required
to
make
sure
that
we
do
not
overspend
our
budget
allocations
so
just
to
make
sure
that
we
are
in
state
compliance.
F
Okay,
that
that's
great,
there
was
some
confusion,
and
so
this
today
is
just
to
allow
us
to
accept.
Yes,
the
details
will
come
further
on.
F
G
F
C
D
A
resolution
authorizing
the
chief
of
the
chattanooga
police
department
to
renew
a
one-year
blanket
agreement
with
leica
geosystems
incorporated
to
provide
service,
repairs,
updates
and
warranty
service
for
police
scan
station
equipment.
Beginning
may
25th
2020
through
may
24
2021
with
one
optional
annual
renewal
and
an
annual
spend
limit
not
to
exceed
forty
thousand
dollars.
C
Okay,
I
see
no
hands
councilman
mitchell.
Would
you
confirm
that
we
have
read
into
the
minutes
in
the
committee
meeting
last
week?
Items
e,
I
guess
all
the
way
through
l
is
that
correct.
C
I
H
Yes,
I
did
thank
you
very
much
councilman.
Thank
you.
C
We
have
no
departmental
reports
tonight,
council,
if
you
would
look
over
purchasing
items
for
tonight
and
see
if
you
have
any
questions
concerning
any
purchase
item
for
tonight,
councilman
oglesby.
Is
that
an
old
hand.
I
All
right
and
falling
in
line
with
councilman
gilbert,
that's
an
old
hand.
C
Okay,
all
right!
Okay,
if
you
would
pull
up
the
june
9th
whoops
the
june
9th
agenda
and
see
if
you
have
any
questions.
In
fact,
let
me.
C
C
We
do
have
a
couple
of
agreements,
resolutions
to
enter
into
a
lease
agreement,
any
questions
about
those
under
economic
community
development,
nope,
okay
and
looks
like
one
agreement
for
under
legal.
C
Councilman
ledford,
we
do
have
next
week
an
item
on
here
concerning
davidson
road.
It's
my
understanding.
It's
my
understanding.
We're
going
to
put
up
railroad
crossings.
B
About
the
flooding
yeah
well,
it'll
be
more
like
the
big,
the
barriers
you
saw
on
the
beaches
of
normandy.
But
then
you
know
whatever.
C
J
Purchase
well
no,
it's
the
item
that
was
last
week
how
councilman
gilbert
you
know
received
all
the
information
that
he
need
because
from
last
week,
justin
has
stated
that
you
know
we
was
in
a
time
bomb
like
it
was
urgent
that
we
needed
to
figure
something
out.
J
B
L
A
H
From
from
me,
councilman
the,
but
what
I'd
like
to
do,
if
possible,
if
it's?
Okay
with
you,
mr
chair,
I
guess
that,
would
this
will
happen
in
other
business.
I
guess
would
be
the
best
place
during
the
council
meeting,
but
I
would
like
to
ask
because
I
would
like
to
first
apologize
to
the
council
for
not
doing
a
better
job
and
making
sure
you
had
the
information
you
needed
to
to
vote
on
this.
H
H
C
J
K
A
C
K
Welcome
to
the
hr
committee,
we
bring
up
miss
beverly,
please.
K
Miss
beverly:
can
you
enlighten
us
on
the
resolution
that
we
that
miss
our
councilwoman
kunrow
proposed
to
educate
us
on
some
of
the
of
that
resolution?.
M
M
Now
I-
and
that
is
outside
of
my
purview
as
your
chief
human
resources
officer,
but
I
will
be
glad
to
assist
you
in
and
answering
any
questions
relative
to
the
paid
sick
leave.
I
don't
know
enough
about
the
thinking
behind
the
resolution
to
adequately
go
into
all
of
those
details,
so
I
would,
I
would
ask
the
council
or
councilwoman
coonrod
to
please
help
provide
some
of
that
and
again
I'll,
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions
that
would
aid
the
council
and
arriving
at
their.
K
Oh,
I'm
sorry
councilwoman
coonrod.
J
Thank
you.
I
don't
have
any
questions,
but
beverly
is
absolutely
right.
It
was
more
as
a
legislation
for
the
state,
because
we
I
recognize
that
with
the
city,
we
can't
you
know
direct
or
mandate
for
employers
to
provide
paid
sick
leave.
So
the
point
of
the
legislation
is
this
is
that
we
know
right
now
doing
this
pandemic
and
numbers
are
increasing
in
our
latino
population
right.
J
So,
if
you're
fearful
of
going
to
the
doctor,
because
you're
going
to
be
off
work
for
some
time,
then
of
course
that's
where
paid
sick
leave
will
come
in
at
and
you're
going
to
be
more
than
likely
to
go
to
the
doctor
to
get
your
health
related
concerns
addressed,
and
that's
where
I
think
that
we
could,
you
know,
get
with
our
state
legislators,
it's
something
most,
definitely
that
we
can
get
on
board
with
to
making
sure
that
people
have
paid
sick
leave,
and
you
know,
people
that
are
really
affected-
are
low
income
and
are
minority
workers
were
affected
by
because
a
high
percentage
do
not
have
paid
sick
leave.
J
They're,
not
you
know
it's
not
offered,
or
they
can't
afford
it.
Or
you
know,
this
is
just
should
be
a
given
and
the
fact
that
president
trump
already
made
it
a
part
of
you
know
he
signed
into
legislation
with
the
coronavirus
act
like
it
is
there.
So
I'm
just
asking
for
counsel.
You
know
to
be
on
board
to
make
sure
that
we're
voicing
our
concerns
about
it,
because
it
is
something
that
is
needed
for
everybody.
K
N
N
So
is
the
intent
of
this
to
to
encourage
private
employers
to
provide
the
sick
leave
or
is
the
intent
to
have
legislation
changed
so
that
the
city
can
require,
and
if
it
is
required,
the
language
is
specific
to
cobit
19
and
is
it?
Is
it
to
be
kept
to
that?
I
just
was
curious.
What
the
the
breadth
of
the
intent
was
of
of
the
legislation
on
this
piece.
J
Thank
you.
So
the
intent
is
to
just
ask
you
know
our
employees.
Would
they,
you
know,
consider
paid
sick
leave
or,
if
they're
able
to
provide
it
to
our.
You
know,
people
that
are
working
for
them
and
not
just
specific
into
the
covet
19
which
that's
what's
you
know,
provoking
it,
but
also
it's
just
talk
about
like
the
lack
of
paid
sickly
not
just
through
for
covet,
but
for
any
illness
like
they're,
not
able
to
go
to
the
doctor
and
take
those
days
off.
J
So
it's
important
not
just
for
covic
but
for
any
illness,
but
we're
just
asking-
and
I
think
it's
a
great
supportive,
ass
we've
had
austin
is
not
in
attendance
as
a
participant
right
now,
but
even
with
our
labor
unions
unions,
that
it
is
something
that
they
support.
100.
N
N
Ahead,
councilman,
okay,
so
the
the
initial
language,
like
I
said,
talks
about,
encouraging,
which
I
I
think
is
great.
I
I
think
that
we
as
a
governing
body
should
be
encouraging,
starting
with
ourselves,
encouraging
all
kinds
of
different
benefits
to
employees.
N
It's
the
it's
that
right
below
that
it
talks
about
requiring
and
then
there's
a
section
two
that
I'm
not
sure
should
be
maybe
mingled
in
with
this
piece
of
legislation,
because
it
it
is
the
one
that
is
urging
governor
bill
lee
to
suspend
and
reveal
a
tendency
code
annotated
to
where
local
bodies
would
be
allowed
to
require
employers.
N
Personally,
I
would
rather
that
be
a
broader
issue
to
discuss
in
and
of
itself,
as
opposed
to
part
of
this
legislation
initially
worded
to
to
encourage
employers.
N
I
think
those
are
two
totally
different
things,
and
I
don't
know
that
you
want
to
get
wrapped
up
in
the
importance
of
this
encouraging
employers
to
do
this
for
their
employees
as
well
as,
at
the
same
time,
encouraging
the
the
state
delegation
to
you
know
to
push
forward
a
bill
that
that
totally
changes
the
tennessee
law
for
the
entire
state,
not
just
the
city
of
chattanooga,
but
I
mean
those
are
my
thoughts.
I,
the
intent
of
encouraging
employers
to
offer
this
to
employees.
N
I
I
think,
is
a
great
idea
and
as
leaders,
those
are
the
types
of
things
we
should
be
doing.
I
just
wasn't
sure
why
they
were
being
combined
with
encouraging
and
then
asking
for
the
ability
to
require
it
at
the
same
time.
I
just
didn't
know
if
they
were
really
intended
to
be
mixed
together
and
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
J
E
Yes,
ma'am,
you
can
take
anything
this,
this
body
can
do
what
it
wishes
regarding
this
legislation.
The
the
reason
for
the
I
guess
the
inclusion
here
regarding
751
1802
is
that's
the
provision
of
tennessee
law.
That
says
that
there
is
only
certain
things
that
you
could
regulate
here,
and
it's
got
to
be
based
upon
some
type
of
anti-discrimination
practice
that
is
considered
by
the
state.
N
B
Thank
you
chairman.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
councilwoman
coonrod
for
her
intent
and
her
direction
on
this.
I
think
that's
a
very
nice
and
appropriate
gesture
that
we
would
make-
and
I
I
do
agree
with
councilman
smith
and
that
second
part
being
probably
kind
of
dilutes
it
a
little
bit
or
sends
it
down
a
different
path.
So
I
would
be
very
supportive
in
that,
with
the
second
part
removed.
K
N
Hey
phil,
just
to
to
clarify
that.
Thank
you
that
it
makes
sense
as
as
to
that
point,
but
again,
I
think
adding
that,
in
from
a
legal
standpoint,
does
not
does
not
put
the
focus
where,
where
I
think
this
is
intended
by
the
govern
by
our
governing
body,
to
encourage
our
employers
to
take
care
of
their
employees
and
offer
the
sick
leave
be
due
to
covet.
I
mean
this
specifically
states
coveted.
N
I
agree
with
councilwoman
kunrad
that
that
it
could
be
extended
beyond
that,
but
this
particular
piece
of
legislation
as
drafted
is
very
specific
to
covid,
so
to
have
section
two
that
has
nothing
to
do
with
with
a
timeline.
That
would
even
be
reasonable.
N
I
think
dilutes
the
intent
and
may
not
even
get
it
where
it
where
it
needs
to
be
with
this
body,
passing
something
and
focusing
on
encouraging
other
local
employers
to
offer
this
paid
sick
leave
to
their
employees.
So
I
would
say,
taking
section
two
out
and
making
sure
that
that
this
legislation
is
to
encourage
private
employees
is
to
me,
makes
perfect
sense
for
what
this
governing
body
should
do
and
if
we
want
to.
N
J
You
know
it's
always
my
intent
to
you
know
work
with
my
colleagues,
so
we
can.
You
know,
make
sure
that
we
get
legislation
that
we
all
agree
on.
So
I
can.
I
can't
do
that.
We
can
remove
section
two,
so
we
I
do
have
the
labor
union
austin
on.
If
he
is
he
able
to
speak,
would
you
allow
him
a
second
or
two.
G
N
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
put
me
on
there
too,
sorry
for
interrupting.
K
Well,
miss
militia.
Can
you
bring
up
what's
the
person's
name
again,
this
customer
comrade.
L
Okay,
folks,
hey
austin,
how
are
you
doing,
sir?
Not
too
bad
thanks
thanks
for
allowing
me
to
speak
council
so
yeah
I
apologize
I
I
would
just
jumped
on,
but
I
guess
I
would
just
want
to
speak
an
encouragement
of
this
resolution.
It's
a
resolution,
that's
passed
in
nashville
and
it
should
be
coming
up
in
memphis
city
council
soon
as
well
and
again,
I
think,
from
a
labor
perspective
from
a
perspective
of
working
folks
in
the
community.
L
If,
even
though
we
know
that
there
are
regulations
in
place
that
that
don't
allow
us
to
take
very
concrete
steps
on
requiring
paid
sick
leave,
it
does
mean
a
lot
to
working
folks
in
the
community
to
have
their
city
council
standing
up
and
saying
that
it's
it's
important,
especially
in
this
moment
with
coven
19,
with
record
levels
of
unemployment
and
people
dealing
with
very
challenging
circumstances
to
have
something
concrete
where
their
public
officials
are
advocating.
For
that.
So
definitely
appreciate
y'all,
bringing
it
to
the
agenda
and
yeah.
That's
what
I
that's.
K
Thank
you,
sir.
I
believe
everybody's
on
the
on
an
agreement
that
there's
a
great
resolution
that
needs
to
be
tweaked,
so
councilwoman
conrad,
you're
gonna,
get
with
mr
knoblet
to
get
the
language
changed.
J
M
K
K
E
If
you
have
an,
I
guess,
a
person
and
a
sponsor
I'll
put
it
on
whenever
y'all
wish
it
to
be
heard
on
here.
If
you
want
to
have
them
together
as
a
group
with
other
resolutions,
we
can
do
that
or
whenever
you
want
to
do
it
on
your
agenda.
C
Sure
phil,
I
I
thought,
after
after
a
resolution
or
an
ordinance,
goes
through
committee,
the
committee
person
asked,
if
we're
ready
for
it
to
be
placed
on
the
agenda.
Yes,
I'm
not
sure
that
we're
ready
at
this
time,
because
we
haven't
seen
the
final
legislation
or
the
the
final
product,
but
typically,
I
think
in
our
rules
that
that
the
committee
chair
is
supposed
to
check
with
the
with
the
council
and
the
entire
council
either
puts
it
on
or
they
say
that
it
needs
work
and
we
need
to.
E
K
I
think
that
the
chat
that
councilwoman
kunron
has
is
that
she
wanted
to
change
the
language
and
I
guess
bring
it
to
us
and
they'll,
see
it,
and
then
I
think
councilman
councilman
byrd,
on
the
agenda.
If
this
everybody's
on
agreement.
K
N
Swim.
Thank
you.
Mr
chair.
I
mean
I,
my
preference
honestly
would
be
to
see
this
on
the
agenda
sooner
than
later,
even
as
early
as
next
week.
However,
I
do
think
it's
important
for
the
council
to
review
the
the
final
language
in
the
tweaks
before
it
does
go
on,
but
I
don't
want
to.
N
I
don't
want
to
belay
that
another
week,
two
weeks
or
even
further
to
do
that
if
this
is
something
that
phil,
it's
there's
really
just
part
of
one
line
and
then
section
two
to
be
taken
out
and
I
think
the
rest
of
the
languages.
It
serves
the
intent
of
this
body
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
done
and
then
have
this
on
the
agenda
sooner
than
later.
But
that's
that's
my
personal
feeling,
council.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
O
Byrd
yeah:
that's
with
council
councilman
ken
smith
phil.
How
long
would
it
take
for
you
to
get
this
out
to
us
in
the
email?
So
we
can
look
at
the
legislation
and
send
back
any
questions
that
we
have.
H
You,
mr
chair,
you
know
an
option
would
be
if
we
want
this
on
and
there's
enough
will
to
put
it
on.
I
guess
we
would
be
talking
about
in
two
weeks.
It
would
be
on
the
two
weeks.
You
know,
mr
attorney,
is
it
still
okay
to
get
something
on.
E
H
Well,
well,
what
I
was
going
to
say
is:
is
we
can
put
it
on
right
now?
I
mean
there's
several
times
when
we
have
something
on
the
agenda
and
then
someone
works
on
an
amendment
and
they
introduce
an
amendment
when
we
when
it
actually
comes
up.
So
if
that
would
help
expedite
getting
in
front
of
the
council
doing
it
that
way
versus
changing
waiting
for
the
change
getting
everybody
to
look
at
it,
I
mean
that's
just
an
alternative
way
to
do
it.
J
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
I
like
ford
as
jerry
stated,
thank
you
for
bringing
it
up
jerry
that
so
we
can
move
forward
with
it
and
the
corrections
I
mean
he
can
delete
that
out.
The
section
two
delete
it
off
and
then
remove
the
one
word
and
everything
else
looks
good
according
to
my
colleagues,
so
I
don't
want
to
delay
it
even
even
further.
K
Yeah,
I
think
I
have
everybody
has
spoken
or
no
hands
raised.
It
seems
like
everybody's
on
the
same
accord
about
assuming
we
can
get
this
put
on.
We
need
to
put
it
on.
K
C
K
E
F
K
Yes,
councilwoman
bird,
so.
F
E
F
What
we
have
we
have
everything
in
place.
Now
we
have
the
two
co-sponsors,
you're
gonna,
modify
the
wording
and
then
you're
going
to
get
it
to
counsel
for
the
9th
to
be
put
on
for
the
16th.
Is
that
correct
and
then
that
breaks
nobody's
rules.
J
Thank
you,
churches
for
clarity
and
to
my
understanding
I
thought
that
if
we
have
two
council
people
and
we
asking
can
it
be
put
on
the
ninth
and
instead
at
a
one
week,
notice
rather
than
a
two
week
notice
that
it
could
be
done.
That.
K
J
We
we
just
demonstrated
that
when
we
allowed
carrie
not
to
be
put
off
for
two
weeks
and
they'll
be
on
the
agenda
for
next
week,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
giving
everybody
the
same
practice.
We're
going
to
ask
and
make
that
the
rule
of
being
able
to
make
exceptions.
J
But
so,
if
we
can
put
it
on
the
9th
I'd
like
it
to
be
on
the
9th.
So.
K
What
I'm
understanding
for
you,
councilman
coonrod
you're,
asking
us
that?
Can
we
put
it
on
the
knife
instead
of
the
16th
and
if
everybody's,
on
the
same
accord
with
five
votes?
I
think
we
could
do
that,
even
though
we
have
a
rule.
So
the
question
is
on
consensus:
how
do
you
want
to
actually
put
it
on
the
ninth.
K
Yeah
yeah,
okay,
yeah,
the
consensus
is
that
we're
gonna
put
on
the
ninth,
so
mr
phil,
if
you
can
go
ahead
and
give
a
councilman
coonrod
and
change
the
language
and
then
send
it
to
council,
and
then
we
will
put
it
on
the
ninth
for
to
vote
on
any
other
questions.
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
No
other
questions,
so
I
guess
hr
committee
is
over
and
we're
going
to
go
into
the
zoning
committee.
B
Can
I
go
ahead
and
get
a
thank
you
very
much.
So
john.
You
want
to
bring
up
john
bridger
for
me,
lydia.
B
Thank
you
and
we
will
start
going
through
ordinances
on
first
reading
for
next
week,
tuesday
june
9th
and
soon
as
hello,
mr
bridger
hello.
How
are
you
I'm
like?
I
haven't
talked
to
you
in
ages.
I.
B
Minutes
or
minutes
whatever
right,
you
want
to
go
ahead,
we're
going
to
kind
of
fast
track
this.
Today
we
have
no
denials
in
our
on
our
agenda.
We
have
11
items.
We
have.
We
had
a
really
good
planning
commission
report
or
a
meeting
last
week,
which
is
the
first
or
month,
which
was
the
first
time.
We've
done
that
and
it
went
very
smooth
john,
I
think
very
well.
So
if
you
want
to
kick
us
off
with
the
planning
item
under
6a
and
we'll
start
there,
okay.
B
So
let
me,
while
you're
pulling
that
up
john,
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
just
kind
of
tell
everybody
we're
going
to
kind
of
condense
this
down
a
little
bit
and
not
go
through
some
of
the
details
that
you
normally
do
when
we're
in
in
person
just
for
time's
sake
and-
and
I
think
we'll
be
able
to
cover
everything
we
need
to
cover
today.
B
P
So
this
first
case
is
a
request
to
rezone
from
r1
to
r2
for
a
proposed
duplex.
This
is
in
the
hixson
area,
see
if
I
can
get
my
screen
to
work
with
me.
P
So,
if
you're
familiar
with
hamlet
road,
this
is
right.
Past
the
railroad
crossing
in
hamel
road
off
of
crescent
club
drive,
I
requested
again
r2
for
basically
to
establish
a
second
unit
on
a
property
again.
This
is
this.
Shows
you,
the
location.
P
The
current
zone
is
r1.
You
do
see
some
r2
on
the
another
street
sarasota
drive
on
the
other
side
of
the
railroads.
P
Most
of
the
the
development
is
single-family
nature,
although
there
is
a
actually
a
multi-family
like
a
mobile
home
mini
park
further
to
the
south
from
this
property
off
of
crescent
road.
The
landis
plan
for
this
area,
the
hicks
language
plan,
recommends
single
unit
or
low
density,
residential
and
some
two
families
if
the
density
is
compatible.
P
In
this
case,
the
proposed
density
is
about
2.24
units
per
acre
and
it
being
right
next
to
a
existing
commercial
zone
to
the
north
staff
was
comfortable
with
improving
this
particular
lot
because
it
borders
a
commercial
zone.
So
we
recommend
it
to
approve
at
planning.
Commission.
There
is
no
opposition,
they
concur
with
staff's
recommendation
to
improve.
B
Very
good,
thank
you,
councilman
or
vice
chairman
smith.
I
don't
think
you
have
any
issues
with
this.
B
P
B
And
this
can
we
have
kicked
down
the
road
several
times
as
predicted,
so
I'm
gonna
have
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
item
c.
Please.
I.
P
Will
do
that
this
is
another
case
not
far
from
this
location.
Let's
see
give
me
a
second.
P
This
is
a
request
to
modify
some
conditions
if
you're
familiar
with
waterside
development,
it
was
rezoned
to
c4
a
few
years
ago
and
as
they're
building
out,
they
found
out
they
needed
to
increase
the
size
of
the
maximum
footprint
for
retail.
Essentially,
they
need
to
increase
it
from
six
thousand
square
feet
to
four
thousand
fourteen
thousand
square
feet
so
just
kind
of
a
point
of
reference.
P
P
So
when
this
was
rezoned
back
in
2016,
there's
about
eight
conditions
and
they
dealt
with
some
kind
of
a
minimal
residential
component.
Some
limits
on
the
total
development
along
gumball
road,
including
maximum
square
footage.
You
see,
there's
number
three
there'd
be
a
buffer
along
gum,
barrel,
road,
some
green
spaces,
tree
plantings,
as
well
as
limiting
the
usages
again
trying
to
be
careful
about
that
seam
where
you
have
residential
across
the
street.
P
So
what
the
applicant
is
asking
to
do
jump
here
is
to
basically
again
increase
it
from
6
000
to
14
000
square
feet.
Staff
was
fine
with
that,
based
on
the
fact
that
a
lot
of
the
site
has
already,
as
we
know,
been
converted
to
commercial.
You
also
have
those
exist.
Other
conditions,
the
buffering
requirements,
the
landscaping
requirements,
the
streetscaping
that
we
think
will
still
provide
a
good
transition
between
any
retail
and
the
residential
across
the
street.
So
staff
was
fine
with
approving
this
modification.
P
I'm
sorry
at
planning,
commission
there's,
no
opposition
planning.
Commission
concurred
with
stats
recommendation,
so
it'll
be
basically
approving
that
modification
and
still
keeping
the
rest
of
those
conditions.
In
effect,
very.
B
Good
john
and
I'm
seeing
no
hands,
and
this
is
in
district
four,
I'm
very
familiar
with
this
project.
I
think
it's
actually
a
good
move,
so
I
won't
have
any
issues
moving
forward
with
that.
So
thank
you
very
much
item
d.
Please
sure.
P
This
is
a
request
to
basically
extend
c2
in
an
area.
This
is
off
of
wilcox
off
of
shelford
road
for
a
golf
course
and
driving
range
and,
as
I
understand,
the
applicants
had
some
community
meetings
with
councilman
gilbert
hilbert
and
his
some
of
his
community
members
to
kind
of
talk
through
that
request.
P
Staff
was
fine
with
the
extension.
I
think
what
we
are
concerned
mainly
dealt
with,
because
you
do
have
a
lot
of
flood
plain
there,
that
you
limit
the
use
to
what
they're
proposing,
which
is
a
golf
course,
so
staff
recommend
approved,
subject
to
it
being
used
as
a
golf
center
golf
range
and
recreational
uses.
Only
at
planning
commission
there's
no
opposition.
They
concur
with
staff's
recommendation
to
approve
with
those
conditions.
K
B
Very
good,
it
seems
like
golf
courses
and
flood
plains
or
flooding
areas
are
the
way
to
go
so
appreciate
it.
Sir.
All
right,
I
see
no
other
hands
lydia.
If
you
can
help
me
with
taking
hands
down.
That
would
be
helpful
for
me
and
we'll
move
on
to
item
e
john.
P
Sure
this
is
a
request.
A
basic
extend.
This
is
in
the
east,
brainerd
by
brushy,
say
brainerd
community.
If
you're
familiar
with
southeastern
salvage.
This
is
right
across
the
street
from
it
they
want
to
extend
r4
for
an
apartment,
development,
total
12
units.
It
would
be
accessing
off
of
crawford
street.
So
it
you
know.
If
you
look
at
the
development,
you
know
fronts
crawford
it's
mostly
commercial
there,
but
there
is
some
residential
to
the
south
and
to
the
east
of
this
property.
P
So
again
you
look
at
the
zoning
here.
You
can
see
there's
some
r4
to
the
north,
but
you
do
have
r1
to
the
south
and
east.
So
again
it's
trying
to
be
mindful
about
transition.
Here
there
was
a
approval
to
rezone
the
property
2004
to
r4,
with
a
condition
of
office
use
only
in
2009,
some
of
the
property
was
zoned
from
r1
to
r4,
with
some
additional
conditions
about
working
with
the
fire
chief
on
turnaround.
P
He
sees
already
some
sight
obscuring
fence
at
the
driveway,
so
staff
was
fine
with
approving
this,
with
the
condition
that
you
continue
to
provide
that
side,
obscuring
fence
on
that
southern
and
eastern
boundary,
where
it
joins
the
r1
single
family
and
limiting
it
to
residential
uses.
Only
so
make
sure
that
again,
there's
no
nuisances
to
those
single
family
residences
to
the
south
and
east.
F
Yeah
john,
was
there
any,
did
you
get
any?
I
think
I
saw
a
very
small
site
plan.
Is
this
an
extension
of?
What's.
P
P
F
Oh
okay,
I'll
tell
you
what,
if
you
could
tell
the
developer.
F
He's
made
no
contact
and
I
would
like
to
see
exactly
what
he's
doing
this
is
an
area
that
could
go.
I
don't
need
a
problem
with
where
you
are
thus
far,
but
this
is
an
area
that
could
go
either
way
and
it's
an
area
that's
trying
to
rebuild
and
he's
not
shown
the
inclination
or
courtesy
for
me
to
see
any
of
this.
So,
okay,
maybe
a
word
to
the
wise
that
maybe
we
need
to
talk
before
next
week.
F
B
F
H
Councilman
mitchell,
I'm
I'm
sure
I'm
overthinking
this
thing,
but
going
back
to
d
recreational
uses
yeah.
Okay,
I
see
I
see
the
golf.
I
see
the
golf
center
but
then
or
recreational
uses.
What
give
me
john,
if
you
could
give
me
an
example,
or
do
you
have
a
category
called
recreational
uses
where
you
could
actually
give
me
a
list
of
what
is
included
in
that.
P
H
That
would
be
one
that
would
be
one
I'd
be
interested
in
hearing.
If
that's
the
recreation
you
used
to
go
car,
everybody
loves
it.
P
All
right,
gotcha
I'll,
let
I'll
ask
lda
if
they
got
any
insights
on
that.
H
B
No
you're
great-
that
was
actually
a
really
great
question.
Councilman.
I
appreciate
it.
That's
that's
some
food
for
thought.
Definitely
recreationally.
I
think.
H
B
I
promised
councilman
mitchell
I'd,
make
this
very
streamlined
for
him.
B
This
is
district,
7,
reserve
and
mountain
pass.
P
Yeah
here
we
go,
as
you
recall,
about
a
year
ago,
had
a
rezoning
in
the
autumn
park
community
for
an
apartment,
development
about
240
units
close
to
the
velsa
call,
the
former
vessel
call
site,
there's
a
number
of
conditions
that
were
approved
with
that
request.
P
This
is
kind
of
not
not
uncommon,
as
they
get
into
the
more
detailed
site
planning
they
start
doing
their
actual
development
plans.
They
need
to
make
some
tweaks,
so
there
are
they're
basically
requesting
to
amend
three
of
the
conditions
that
were
originally
approved
by
council.
P
Again,
the
zoning
is
r3
with
conditions
you
see,
it's
got
m1
zoning
to
the
north
and
east
and
west,
and
they
got
r2
zoning
to
the
south.
This
shows
you.
The
conditions
that
were
originally
approved,
the
ones
highlighted
in
orange,
are
the
ones
that
they're
wanting
to
modify,
and
essentially
the
issue
was
that
basically,
two
three
and
five
were
not
specific
enough
as
it
relates
to
what
buildings
and
where
exactly?
P
Does
the
parking
go
relation
to
the
building
based
on
what
streets
which
buildings
it
should
have
that
25
foot
setback,
and
so
what
they've
done?
Is
you
see
here
in
this
slide
for
the
setbacks?
You
can
see
the
existing
language
and
the
white
text
that
no
parking
should
be
provided
between
the
building
and
in
the
public
street,
and
they
basically
made
it
more
specific,
saying
no
parking
show
front
central
avenue,
kirkland
avenue
or
51st
street.
So
that
way
you
can
see
the
parkings
in
the
interior
of
the
site.
P
You
see
the
site
plan
and
to
the
right
there,
but
the
issue
is
keeping
the
parking
off
of
those
exterior
streets,
so
you
have
a
more
walkable
type
environment,
same
thing
for
setbacks.
Again,
basically,
they
tweaked
the
language
to
make
those
setback.
Language
applied
specifically
to
central
ave,
kirkland
street
and
west
51st
street,
then
on
the
buffer
to
the
south.
P
The
original
language
said
retain
existing
vegetation
along
the
slope
portion
of
the
site.
What
they're
proposing
to
mend
it
is
have
a
more
specific
measurement
of
for
60
feet
off
of
that
right-of-way
that
they
would
retain
that
vegetation.
They
give
you
an
idea
of
what
that
looks.
Like
I
took
a
picture.
This
is
from
our
hamilton
county
gis
system.
This
gave
you
a
general
measure.
You
see
that
area
highlighted
in
blue,
that's
about
60
feet,
so
you
would
protect
most
of
that
slope
and
the
reason
it's
it's
important.
P
You
do
have
some
residences
off
of
51st
street,
that
that
creates
an
important
buffer
between
them
and
the
apartment
development
to
the
north.
If
you
look
at
again,
the
land
use
pattern
of
this
area.
You've
got
single
family
to
the
south,
you've
got
industrial
to
the
west,
the
north
and
the
east,
so
the
staff
was
fine
with
the
condition
changes
because
it
basically
made
it
more
specific,
as
it
related
to
how
the
site
would
be
built
out.
P
There
was
opposition
at
planning
commission
and
what
was
what
the
comments
that
were
made
at
the
meeting
were
the
folks
who
still
had
concerns
about
apartments
going
on
that
site.
They
also
want
to
have
an
opportunity
to
meet
with
the
developer.
As
you
know,
based
on
the
covid
meeting
limitations,
they
want
to
have
an
opportunity
to
somehow
please
communicate.
I'm
not
aware
of
any
updates
as
far
as
the
applicant
having
opportunity
to
meet
with
the
neighborhood,
but
there's
also
concern
about
protecting
that
hillside.
P
B
I
I'm
good
the
changes
are
great.
It
only
adds
value
to
this
project
and
I'm
good
with.
B
B
P
Yes,
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
from
ucx4
to
ura3's
in
the
form
based
code
area
for
essentially
for
a
a
a
residential
unit
with
an
a
secondary
unit
on
the
same
parcel.
This
is
located
off
of
williams
street
between
williams
and
broad,
if
you
feel
like
a
little
narrow,
alleyway,
it's
kind
of
like
it
feels
like
a
small
alley
street
along
williams
there,
between
williams
and
market
street.
P
Here
here's
an
example:
it
gives
you
a
better
representation.
You
see
the
area
highlighted
in
yellow
you
see
main
street
to
the
south,
it's
basically
an
existing
residence
and
they
want
to
be
able
to
have
a
secondary
unit.
P
Let
me
jump
ahead
on
this
one,
the
the
issue
with
cx4.
Is
it
really
doesn't
allow
you
to
do
two
unit
dwellings,
so
they
need
the
ura3,
so
they
can
do
a
two
unit
dwelling
on
the
site.
Essentially,
staff
was
fine
with
that,
because
the
downtown
plan
recommends
diverse
housing.
This
is
another
housing
option
for
that
block,
so
we
were
fine
with
approving
it,
so
we
recommend
approval
with
the
ra3.
P
There
was
no
opposition
planning
commission.
They
concurred
with
staff's
recommendation
to
approve
very
good.
B
P
Okay,
this
is
a
request.
This
is
an
highland
park,
community,
a
request
to
resume
from
r1
to
r2
to
accommodate
an
existing
duplex.
That's
on
the
property,
they've
already
added
a
second
story
to
an
existing
two-family
dwelling.
So
it's
a
link.
It's
a
grandfather
to
use.
They
just
want
the
zoning
to
basically
make
the
use
legal
instead
of
a
non-conforming
legal
use.
P
There's
rtz
zoning
to
the
north.
The
rest
of
the
area
is
zoned
r1,
that
property
to
north
was
rezoned
into
2016
to
rtz,
to
allow
six
lots
to
be
built
on
that
side
of
the
street.
If
you
look
at
the
existing
land
use
pattern
on
the
block,
there
already
are
some
duplexes
on
this
block,
so
this
is
not
the
only
duplex
on
this
block
the
area
three
plan
which
will
be
coming
before
you
all
for
adoption
in
july.
It
recommends
urban
residential
at
this
location.
P
Note
that
the
area
three
plan
also
has
a
single
family
designation.
This
is
not
in
that
to
protect
single
family.
There's
an
urban
overlay
or
overlay,
it
says
single
family
only.
This
is
in
the
urban
residential
which
allows
more
of
a
mix
of
residential
uses,
and
so
it
is
supported
by
the
draft
area
three
plan
to
allow
a
two
two-unit
structure
on
this
property,
so
staff
recommended
approve
because
the
the
proposed
use
is
consistent
with
the
area.
C
Chairman,
thank
you
councilman,
and
this
is
just
a
typo
feel
in
the
ordinance.
E
C
B
P
Okay,
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
from
r3
and
m1
to
ugc
for
a
redevelopment
project
to
redevelop
an
existing
building
to
apartments
be
48
units.
This
is
right
next
to
the
chattanooga
national
cemetery,
which
is
you
see
that
brown
area
to
the
north?
P
If
you
look
at
the
uses
or
the
first
first
of
zones,
you
do
have
some
existing
ugc
in
the
area
as
well
as
r4
and
m1
zones.
There's
a
pretty
well
established
history
in
this
immediate
area
of
approving
ugc.
So
this
would
not
be
the
first
time
we've
approved
ugc
in
this
area.
P
P
The
historic
river
to
ridge
area
3
plan
recommends
what
we
call
an
industrial
hybrid,
which
basically
means
light
industrial,
that's
neighborhood
friendly,
so
you
could
have
a
mix
of
residential
commercial
or
light
industrial.
P
So
this
proposal
is
consistent
with
the
area
3
plan
recommendations,
although
we
feel
like
it'll,
be
good
to
at
since
they're,
proposing
apartments
to
residential
to
limited
residential
uses.
Only
because
you
do
have
the
national
cemetery
in
the
back
want
to
be
sure
you
don't
have
any
kind
of
uses
that
might
create
undue
noise.
That
would
be
an
issue
for
that.
You
know
for
any
kind
of
ceremonies
that
might
happen
there
to
the
north,
so
we
recommend
approval
of
the
ugc
limit
of
residential
uses
only
at
planning
commission.
There
is
no
opposition.
B
P
Yeah
this
one
is
a
pretty
large
site.
It's
a
pretty
major
development,
also
stand
acoustic
factor.
This
is
located
in
the
oak
grove
community
between
main
street
dodge
avenue
and
23rd
street,
and
the
basically
20
acres,
that's
proposed
for
a
revitalization
project,
mostly
consisting
of
residential
with
some
commercial.
P
You
know
the
residential
feature
is
a
mix
of
a
small
lot
single
family
multi-family,
townhouse
type
developments
in
an
urban
setting.
Here
you
can
see
again.
The
lay
of
the
land
comprises
several
blocks,
one
way
of
kind
of
visualizing.
This
is
you
think
of
walking
street,
which
kind
of
forms
the
north
south
spine
of
this
most
of
your
industrial
property
and
zoning
is
to
the
east
of
that.
On
the
missionary
ridge
side,
then,
as
you
go
to
the
west,
is
where
it
begins
to
transition
more
to
the
neighborhood
type
condition.
P
If
you
look
at
the
zoning
of
the
area,
it's
a
mix
of
n1,
m2,
c2
and
ugc
and
r2.
So
it's
got
a
little
bit
everything
going
on
and
mostly
vacant.
Just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
zoning
history
back
in
2007,
there
was
a
request
to
rezone
to
r3.
P
Then,
more
recently,
in
2014
there
was
a
request
to
rezone
the
santa
cruz
site
itself
to
ugc
for
a
redevelopment
project
that
was
approved
with
some
conditions
and
just
as
a
reminder
about
what
those
zones,
as
is
currently
zoned,
would
allow
you
have
m1,
which
we
know
is
kind
of
your
most
heavy
industrial
type
zone
that
could
have
your
blast
furnace
beat
processing
plants.
P
Your
kind
of
your
high
impact
uses
it
there's
the
m2,
which
is
more
of
your
shipping
warehousing
type
uses,
and
you
have
your
r2,
which
is
your
multi-family
ugc,
is
your
more
traditional
urban
shop
front
zone
that
allows
both
again
the
urban
multi-story
commercial
development
with
mixed
use,
but
note
that
it
does
not
allow
single
family
or
two
family
dwellings,
which
is
going
to
be
important.
Our
conversation
in
a
minute
and
there's
some
c2,
and
we
know
what
c2
allows.
So
I'm
going
wrong
my
bad
everything.
P
P
Then
you
see
the
blue
areas,
that's
where
there
might
be
some
commercial
development,
particularly
the
standard
thatcher
building,
which
is
this
area
right
here.
I'm
highlighting
with
my
cursor
the
area
three
river
to
ridge
plan
recommends
mixed
residential
urban
residential
and
something
called
urban
corridor
for
this
area.
P
The
mixed
residential
is
and
is
pretty
much
in
line
with
what
the
applicant's
proposing
in
terms
of
mix
of
residential
housing
types
and
the
urban
corridor
designation
to
the
north
is
is
comparable
to
what
you
would
see
for
a
ugc
type
zone.
P
One
of
the
things
we
asked
the
applicant
to
do
as
we
considered
the
request
for
c3
and
I'm
going
to
talk
about
c3
in
a
minute,
is
to
give
us
kind
of
an
example
of
the
type
of
housing
configurations
that
they're
looking
at
for
these
blocks.
Just
to
know
why
c3
would
be
needed
which
the
applicant
provided-
and
this
illustration
shows
how
they're
trying
to
mix
both
single
family
small
lot,
which
is
you
see
these
blue?
P
These
blue
buildings
here
some
small
multi-unit
buildings,
some
town
houses
and
apartments
on
a
block.
So
this
is
what
you
you
know
a
lot
of
urban
blocks.
You
would
see
a
mix
of
housing
like
that
on
a
single
block
which
not
would
not
be
typical
in
the
suburbs
right,
but
in
the
urban
places.
This
is
what
you
typically
see.
P
The
challenge
with
our
current
zoning
code
is
that
we
really
don't
have
a
good
zoning
tool
that
would
allow
either
the
that
kind
of
housing
configuration
ugc
does
not
allow
single
family
detached
or
two
family
rtz
does
not
allow
multi-family,
and
if
you
try
to
do
r3,
which
is
your
multi-family
zone,
it
has
suburban
setbacks,
so
we're
left
with
c3,
which
is
usually
your
urban
sea,
your
central
business
district
zone,
to
use
as
a
tool
to
basically
be
customized
for
this
kind
of
development.
P
P
P
What
we
typically
see
this
zone
now
being
used
is
kind
of
a
customized
urban
zone
tool
when
there
are
no
other
zones
that
will
work
but
because
c3
does
not
have
any
standards
very
little
standards.
I
would
say
we.
We
have
these
list
of
conditions
that
we've
used
pretty
systematically
for
cases
as
a
baseline.
So
what
just
a
reminder
that
the
red
shows
you
the
kind
of
boundary
that
was
set
by
council
back
in
2000?
I
think
it
was
2003.
P
P
If
you
might
recall
that
was
south
of
I-24
in
the
south
brawl
community,
they
needed
some
c3
for
a
special
housing
configuration
on
part
of
a
block,
but
there
have
been
other
requests
for
c3
that
we've
denied,
because
we
were
able
to
find
another
zone
tool
that
would
work.
In
this
case
we
have
a
20
acre
master
plan
site
that
no
other
zone
is
going
to
work.
P
For
I
mean
ugc
normally
would
be
the
go-to
tool,
but
because
the
applicant
is
trying
to
piece
together,
some
single
family
and
multi-family
on
the
same
block,
there's
no
way
to
make
ugc
work
with
that.
So
what
we
came
up
with
is
is
basically
c3
with
the
list
of
conditions.
P
I'm
not
going
to
go
over
all
those
in
detail
to
save
you.
Some
grief,
that's
kind
of
highlight
the
things
they
do
cover
they
do
cover
like
the
uses.
So
there's
some
limits
on
uses,
as
you
can
see
there
under
prohibited,
uses
a
we
kind
of
have
a
map
and
list
what
some
of
those
prohibited
uses
are,
so
they
would
not
be
all
no
auto
oriented
uses,
no
liquor
stores
or
adult-oriented
establishments.
P
A
cell
storage
facility,
so
you
can
see
those
use
limitations.
Then
you
can
see
where
the
areas
that
are
closer
to
the
neighborhoods
they'll
be
residential
uses
only
so
there
will
be
no
commercial
uses
where
you
have
those
residential
neighborhoods
to
the
west
of
watkins
street
and
then
there's
some
conditions.
Around
setbacks,
height
height
would
be
limited.
You
know
outside
the
casual
factory
holding
to
no
more
than
three
stories
or
40
feet,
so
that
gives
some
flexibility
to
do
some
multi-story
but
limited
to
no
more
than
three
stories.
P
There
are
conditions
around
access.
So
if
you
do
have
alleys,
you
want
to
make
sure
that
the
properties
are
accessed
from
the
rear,
which
is
typical
from
a
urban
development
perspective.
You
don't
have
a
lot
of
driveways
on
the
street,
so
those
conditions
are
set
up
to
do
that.
Parking
they'll
have
to
submit
a
parking
plan,
that's
approved
by
the
the
staff
in
terms
of
meeting
the
parking
for
the
area,
and
let's
see
what
else
we
have
elements
around
street
frontage
about
the
ground
floor
building
facade.
P
Eighty
percent
of
it
has
to
be
leasable
to
not
include
parking
lots.
You
can
see
that
dumpsters
these
by
the
way.
These
are
all
the
things
we've
done.
If
you're
familiar
with
some
of
the
c3
cases,
we've
had
off
of
oh
gosh,
what's
in
it
riverfront
parkway,
if
you
remember
some
of
those
developments
between
I'm
telling
the
name
of
the
development.
P
Not
the
band
just
north
of
the
bend.
B
Oh
cameron,
square
cameron,
harbor
cameron,.
P
P
So
anyway,
at
planning
commission
there
is
no
opposition.
They
also
recommend
approved
with
these
conditions.
B
Very
good,
john,
thank
you.
I
see
councilman
mitchell's
hand
is
up,
but
I'd
like
to
give
councilwoman
kunrod
a
chance
to
chime
in
as
this
is
in
her
district
and
I'm
sure,
she's
excited
about
the
investment
and
the
development
opportunities
in
in
that
district.
So
if
you,
if
you
don't
mind
councilwoman.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
chair,
I'm
really
excited
about
it
and
it's
been
really
hard
trying
to
be
quiet
about
it
until
it
was
time
for
it
to
be
presented.
I
think
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
the
ogro
community.
I'm
really
appreciative
of
ethan
collier
for
stepping
up,
saying,
hey.
I
want
to
invest
in
this
community
and
on
his
own
he
said
I
want
to
keep
a
portion
of
it
affordable.
So
I'm
looking
forward
to
it,
I'm
excited
about
it.
I
go
by
and
visit
that
site
every
day.
J
Something
happening
and
changing
the
community
members
are
very
excited
about
it.
So
I'm
just
looking
forward
to
the
final
yeah.
B
H
And-
and
I'm
I'm
I'm
this-
this
property
has
been
a
long
time
coming,
and
you
know
a
couple:
people
have
taken
a
bat
at
it
and
and
struck
out,
but
but
john,
it
seems
to
me
going
through
all
this
and
you
you
you've,
created
a
zoning
designation,
even
though
you've
done
it
with
conditions,
and
I
can
remember
when
cameron
harbor
was
going
in
and
some
of
the
phone
calls
I
was
getting
about
how
hard
it
was
to
deal
with
with
planning
or
you
know
whatever,
and
this
is
no
no
no
criticism.
H
P
Jerry-
I
was
almost
I
didn't.
I
could
have
planned
that
better
with
the
adoption
of
that.
P
We
we
are,
we
are
actually
working
on
some
zoning
tools,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get
the
area
three
plan
adopted
first
and
then
come
right
behind
it
with
some
new
zone
we
are.
We
are
desperate
need
of
at
least
three
new.
I
P
Zone
tools,
one-
that
is
what
I'll
call
more
this
mixed
residential,
which
is
what
this
project
is
really
about.
It's
a
mix
of
it
another
one
is
what
we
call
your
traditional
urban
residential
development
and
then
we
need
one
really
for
also
the
urban
commercial.
So
we're
we've
been
providing
some
preliminary
work
on
that
you're
gonna
be
hearing
from
us
in
about
another
four
to
five
weeks
shortly
about
we're
bringing
in
a
consultant
firm
to
look
at
our
zoning
code
and
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
at
least
have
that
team.
P
Look
at
what
we're
proposing
to
see
that
make
sure
it
kind
of
passes,
muster
and
we'll
also
be
briefing
you
as
counsel
on
those
tools
as
they
move
along.
But
what
we
would
like
to
see
happen
once
you
all
adopt
the
area
three
plan,
hopefully
next
month,
that
you
would
formally
ask
us
to
build
out
those
tools
because
we're
we're
chomping
at
the
bit
to
get
them
out
there.
P
B
Right,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
councilman
mitchell.
I
appreciate
it
and
you
were
exactly
right
on
point.
They
and
I
couldn't
agree
with
you
more
about
the
tools
that
are
needed
so
great
great
response.
John
glad
to
see
we're
working
on
that
we
have
one
resolution
planning,
item
d.
P
Yes,
this
is
an
east
brainerd.
It's
a
pud,
basically
an
extension
of
another
planned
residential
development
about
16
lots.
This
is
located
adjacent
to
batter's
place,
someone
just
jumped
to
the
site
plan.
It
does
have
a
creek
right
flood
running
through
it
on
one
side
of
the
property,
as
you
can
see
here,
they're,
basically
keeping
most
of
the
development
outside
of
that.
So
what
they're
proposing
is
16
lots.
You
can
see
that
everything
to
the
north
will
be
left
as
open
space,
so
staff
felt
like
the
density
was
appropriate.
P
It
was
a
good
use
of
pud
tool
in
terms
of
protecting
that
that
floodplain
to
the
to
the
north
of
this
property,
so
staff
recommended
approval.
There
was
no
opposition
planning.
Commission
planning
commission
concur
with
staff's
recommendation
to
improve
the
put.
B
Very
good,
thank
you.
This
is
also
in
district
four
and
familiar
with
this
project.
I
think
it's
definitely
a
good
fit
so
john.
That
takes
us
to
the
end.
Like
I'm
sorry,
councilwoman
coonrod.
Is
that
an
old
hand.
J
Yeah,
I
was
one
to
come
in
just
make
a
brief
comment
on
the
previous.
When
we
were
talking
about
getting
stuff
done,
that's
right.
He
wanted
to
get
it
done.
I
just
wonder
just
dropping
your
lap
about
the
adus,
please.
P
Coming
back,
we
will
be
following
up
with
y'all
on
that.
What
just
so,
I
guess,
I'll
plant
a
seed.
We
would
like
to
see
adus
be
part
of
the
urban
residential
tools,
but
we
don't
want
to
go
down
that
road
if
it
means
we'll
sp,
be
it
a
year
and
a
half
trying
to
figure
all
that
out.
So
I
guess
what
I
would
try
to
do
is
get
with
you
all
individually.
Take
your
temperatures
on
that.
P
One
of
the
things
I've
been
floating
is
if
we
limit
it
to
the
urban
overlay,
which
essentially
is
think
of
that
as
the
ridge
to
river
area
as
opposed
to
city-wide,
if
that
would
make
it
more
palpable.
So
I'll
talk
to
you
more
about
it,
it
one-on-one
before
we
get
too
far
along,
but
I
know
staff
would
like
to
see
adus
as
part
of
these
new
urban
residential
zone
types.
B
Are
you
good
councilwoman,
thank
you
for
bringing
up
adu's
we've,
it's
it's
a
good
problem
to
have
and
we
would
have
investment
and
opportunities
presented,
especially
in
this
day
and
age.
So
I
appreciate
everybody's
comments
today,
chairman
john,
do
you
have
anything
you
need
to
add
we're
gonna
all
right.
P
So
then,
the
only
thing
else,
I'll
notice
we
haven't
we're
still
working
on
the
area
plans.
We
are
in
the
process
just
to
kind
of
give
you
a
quick
update
on
that.
As
you
know,
since
we
cannot
do
community
meetings
yeah,
we
are
working
with
the
city's
I.t
department
on
looking
at
some
online
engagement
tools,
and
so
our
staff
is
continuing
to
work
on.
If
you
recall,
the
next
two
we
got
on
our
plate
is
area
11
and
area.
10.
B
Yeah
well,
I
know
we
got
a
lot
to
work
through
on
area
11.
john,
let
me
remind
that
june.
23Rd
will
be
our
vegetation
component
special
meeting
where
we'll
talk
about
and
and
be
able
to
get
a
little
bit
better
understanding
of
some
of
the
proposals
before
us
on
steep
slopes
or
floodplains.
B
H
Yeah
before
we
let
john
get
away
and
john,
I
might
be
hitting
you
with
something
you
don't
need
you're,
not
even
aware
of
okay
and
and
on
top
of
that,
it's
not
even
a
complaint
from
my
district.
So
I'm
gonna,
you
know,
throw
the
hand
grenade
and
step
out
pretty
quick,
but
gary
rudolph
has
sent
an
email
and
I
would
assume
other
council
people
got
it
besides
me
because
gary's,
a
pretty
thorough,
individual
and
a
great
great
person
in
my
opinion,
but.
H
He
is
come
up
against
an
rtz
that
I,
I
guess
the
the
the
way
he
puts
it
and
you're
pro
again,
not
aware
of
it
and
I'll
be
glad
to
afford
this
to
you
if
you
need
it,
but
the
way
he
puts
it
is.
H
Is
someone
presented
a
plan
at
the
planning
commission
to
get
rtz
and,
as
it
turned
out,
the
plan
was
not
anything
like
they
had
represented
and
and
and
so
I'm
just
wondering,
if
there's
anything
that
can
be
done
for
gary
in
this
situation
and
if
not,
what
have
we
got
to.
H
H
P
I
can
give
you
an
update
on
that.
It's
where
I
know
where
it
stands.
Currently,
the
issue
is
really.
I
think
it's
also
a
use,
related
question
and
the
nuance
about
what
is
assisted
living
versus
what
is
a
rehab
facility
right
and
I
believe,
we've
got
a
meeting
set
up,
phil
and
I'll
be
correct
if
I'm
wrong.
I
think
sometime
this
week
to
talk
through
that.
My
understanding
is
that
I,
I
don't
think
it's
a
assisted
living
facility,
it's
which
would
still
require
a
special
permit,
but
it's
actually.
P
I
think
it
would
be
more
lined
with
a
drug
rehab
center
because
it's
dealing
with
addiction,
but
we
got
to
talk
with
staff
to
make
sure
you
know
got
the
eyes
dotted
t's
crossed
on
what
the
actual,
what
we
think
the
appropriate
zone
for
that
particular
property
is.
I
think
the
question
at
the
end
of
the
day
may
be
that
they're
out
of
zone.
H
B
We'll
do
thank
you,
councilman
mitchell,
councilman
gilbert,
I
see
your
hand
up
and
then
councilwoman
burrs.
Yes,.
K
Thank
his
chair.
Yes,
sir
excuse
me
john,
did
you
say
that
10
and
11
will
be
done
corresponding
with
each
doing
at
the
same
time,.
P
P
It's
kind
of
what
we're
looking
at,
but
we'll,
let
you
know
as
soon
as
that
gets
finalized,
we're
waiting
on
getting
the
tool,
because
if
we
don't
have
an
online
tool,
we're
stuck
I'm
hopeful
that
working
with
it
I'll
give
some
kudos
to
our
it
team
that
we've
got
a
solution
to
bring
a
tool
online
faster
than
we
thought.
P
K
B
Right,
thank
you
good.
You
good
councilman,
yes,
sir
fantastic
dr
burrs
and
then
councilman
byrd,
yeah.
F
This
is
really
important
because
I
think
if
you
go
across
the
city,
there's
one
out
of
town
organization
that
had
set
up
20
of
these
places,
I
think
illegally,
all
over
town
and
neighborhoods
in
all
kinds
of
neighborhoods,
and
we
didn't
realize
it
and
we
had
the
same
situation
in
our
area
that
gary
had
in
his
area,
and
I
would
suggest
that
you
look
very
strongly
at
what's
happened,
sub
rosa
across
the
city,
because
that's
something
that
really
needs
attending
to
so.
B
Good
all
right
so
gary
knows
that
we're
on
it
that's
great
anthony.
I
see
your
your
your
hand,
sir.
Thank
you
thank.
O
I've
contacted
him
with
dallas
rucker,
with
donald
williams
and
with
john
bridger
about
this
situation,
and
I
think
this
has
a
big
deal
to
also
do
with
when
we
were
speaking
of
site
plans
being
attached
to
the
zoning
carol.
O
It
the
council
needs
some
mechanism
to
where
something
will
trigger
after
we
pass
these
cases,
so
something
will
come
back
because
we
are,
people
are
being
displaced
in
their
communities
because
people
are
coming
to
us
with
a
certain
type
of
zoning
saying
this
is
what
they
want,
they're
doing
something
different
and
mr
rudolph,
he
was
able
to
pull
the
business
name
off
of
his
route.
O
Rider
ep
his
internet
service
when
you're
searching
for
a
hot
spot,
and
it
came
up
that
this
is
a
drug
rehabilitation
center,
and
this
is
it's
just
it's
not
right
and
we
as
a
city
do
need
to
have
stronger
things
in
place
to
make
sure
that
we
can
shut
these
things
down
and
make
sure
that
our
constituents
have
the
safe
life
that
they
that
they've
been
living
for
years.
O
So
I
haven't
been
on
top
of
it,
and
I've
been
in
conversation
with
everyone
about
it,
and
now
we
have
to
go
through
the
process.
So
thank
you
guys
for
the
support
and
thank
you
guys
for
looking
out
for
one
of
our
constituents
and
one
of
our
employees
as
well.
So
thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
councilman
byrd.
I
couldn't
have
said
it
better
myself.
I
think,
john.
You
know
what
you
need
to
do.
Yes,
sir,
from
this,
this
body's
suggestions
I
was
gonna,
add
on
before
we
close
out
that
you
know
we
keep
coming
up
against
this
site
plan,
whether
it's
tied,
whether
it's
not
tied
and
that
conversation
needs
to
continue.
It
needs
to
be
probably
cleared
up
sooner
than
later,
because
you
know
I
know
from
your
your
standpoint.
B
These
site
plans
are
only
with
puds
and,
of
course,
a
one's
under
five
acres,
but
this
council
still
believes.
I
believe
that
this
council
still
believes
that
when
you
present
a
site
plan
as
part
of
that
presentation,
then
that's
that's.
B
What
is
supposed
to
happen
that
that's
what
it
should
be
tied
to
and
if
not
then
don't
present
it,
and
then
you
can
roll
the
dice
and
go
for
your
zoning,
but
when
it's
used
as
a
marketing
tool,
I
think
this
council
and
the
constituents
and
residents
of
this
city
deserve
that
to
be
to
be
handled
in
a
way
where
they
can
rely
on
us
and
rely
on
ldo
to
make
sure
it's
enforced
and
we
give
them
the
tools
to
do
their
job.
So,
let's
keep
the
site
plan
conversation
going
as
well.
B
Anything
else.
You
need
to
add
john,
very
good
chairman.
Do
we
have
anything
else
we
need
to
do
before?
We
adjourn.