►
From YouTube: City Council Agenda Session 1-18-22
Description
City Council Agenda Session 1-18-22
A
A
B
A
D
D
A
A
All
right
that
takes
us
down
to
parks
and
public
works,
which
we
covered
I
think
last
week,
councilman
hester!
Is
that
correct
all
these
items,
I'm
gonna
point
out
an
item
under
e,
a
resolution
authorizing
the
department
of
public
works
and
transportation
to
erect
a
commemorative
secondary
sign
as
mary
ellen
loker
loker
way,
and
we
have
had
a
request
for
this
item
to
be
moved
up
in
the
agenda
and
I
have
no
problems
with
that.
A
A
B
F
B
B
B
E
A
A
G
Thank
you,
maver
approve
of
the
minutes.
Thank
you.
We
have
approve
of
the
minutes
in
a
second
today.
We
are
now
in
public
safety
committee
meeting,
and
this
is
time
for
our
quarterly
report
and
from
park,
and
I
would
like
to
ask
ms
baker
to
come
forward
hello.
How
are
you
I'm
good?
Thank
you
always
good
to
see
you
and
we
are
all
ears.
My
lady.
H
H
You
know
you
know
how
often
that
citizen
complaints
are
a
violation,
is
found
and
the
same
with
the
internally
generated
complaints
because
it
was
the
end
of
the
year.
I
went
ahead
and
gave
you
guys
the
stats
for
the
whole
year
january,
through
december
2021
park
reviewed
163
cases.
Last
year
there
were
some
cases
where
the
ultimate
decision
made
by
the
chief
was
not
the
same
as
the
park's
result,
meaning
we
maybe
exonerated
the
officer
or
found
a
sustained
violation
and
the
chief
found
the
opposite
in
that
particular
case.
H
But
I
did
note
that
in
three
cases
there
was
only
a
partial
disagreement
where
we
might.
There
might
be
four
policies
in
question
and
we
agreed
with
or
the
chief
agreed
with
with
our
recommendation
on
three
of
the
four.
So
it
wasn't
a
complete
disagreement
and
then
I
did
note
like
like
the
example,
the
hypothetical
that
in
one
case
the
chief
actually
found
a
violation
of
policy
where
park
did
not.
H
So
I
think
that
speaks
to
the
process
that
has
been
implemented
through
the
ordinance
that
you
guys
approved,
that
it
gives
the
community
a
representation
in
reviewing
these
cases,
and
you
know
the
fact
that
we
don't
always
agree
with
the
chief.
I
think
that's
a
normal
part
of
the
this
type
of
process.
H
You
know
the
chief
and
the
assistant
chief
that
review
the
cases
after
park.
Does
they
have
you
know
the
internal
knowledge
of
you
know
the
policies
more
than
we
do,
and
so
I
think
that
that
might
be
why
there
is
some
disagreement
and
then
I
remember
one
case
where
we
thought
there
had
been
a
violation
of
policy,
but
when
the
assistant
chief
went
back
and
and
reviewed
the
case,
he
he
found
well,
no,
the
officer
had
done
the
report
as
required,
and-
and
we
didn't
have
that
information,
so
you
know.
H
Sometimes
the
disagreements
are
because
we
didn't
have
all
the
information
at
the
time
I
in
the
second
category
I
note
the
categories
of
violations
they're
broken
down
into
the
you
know
the
types
of
policies
that
we
see
and
the
fact
patterns.
There's.
You
know
the
improper
investigations
insubordination
pursuit
policy
violations.
B
B
You're
really
doing
a
great
service
for
your
community,
and
this
requires
a
lot
of
time.
There's
no
doubt
about
it.
160
cases,
that's
in
a
year
that
you
reviewed
that's
been
generated
to
you,
chief
scruggs.
How
many
I
remember
hearing
in
a
previous
presentation
by
chief
roddy,
200
plus
thousand
interactions,
that's
correct
a
year
is.
B
B
And
I
really
I
just-
and
this
was
a
good
thing
we
put
into
place.
We
have
really
good
people
working
this
and
I'm
glad
to
see
this
conversation
going
on
and
chairman.
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
on
this,
because
you
worked
very
hard
on
this
and
I
really
just.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
don't
really
have
any
questions
per
se,
because
I
can
read
the
report,
but
anything
you
want
to
add
that
we
can
continue
to
to
to
move
forward
and.
E
Initially,
I
would
say
k
would
probably
agree
that
there
was
some
apprehension
or
some.
There
was
a
whole
lot
more
question
on
the
front
end
than
there
are
now.
Folks
are
a
lot
more
comfortable
with
that
process,
and
they
they
see
that
we
aren't
just
rubber
stamping
these
complaints,
we're
actually
very
thoroughly
going
through
them.
So
the
process
is
really
working.
B
And
you
made
a
great
point,
because
this
report
reflects
that
there's
conversation,
there's
dialogue,
there's
some
disagreements
and
I
think
that
does
prove
that
it
is
working
and
when
it
comes
to
transparency,
which
I
remember
hearing
about
this
in
the
beginning,
you
know
I
feel
like
you're
here
about
every
three
weeks
presenting
to
us
and
I
don't
know
how
much
more
transparent
that
can
get
to
be
honest
with
you,
so
I
just
I
mean
thank
you
for
your
work
on
this.
Both
of
you.
Thank
you,
chairman.
D
Kay,
I'm
going
to
say
what
I've
I've
said
a
couple
of
times,
you're
working
really
really
hard,
and
the
success
of
the
committee
has
a
lot
to
do
with
your
character,
your
credibility
and
the
fact
that
you,
you
run
a
good
shop.
I
have
one
question:
are
all
of
the
appointees
showing
up
and
participating,
and
if
not,
I
don't
want
to
put
you
on
the
spot.
But
if
not,
let
us
know
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
talking
about
is
all
of
the
committees
being
active
and
present
and
representative
of
their
communities.
D
I
my
colleagues,
can
speak
for
themselves,
but
if
there's
ever
a
case
where
our
rep
district
6
representative
is
not
there,
then
I
need
to
know
about
it.
Thank
you
thank
you
for
for
showing
up
and
for
doing
this
for
us
and
for
representing
a
very
important
aspect
to
the
community
chief
thanks
for
working
in
partnership.
D
G
H
Well,
I
think
so
what
the
process
is
park
makes
a
recommendation
and
it
goes
back
to
the
police
department,
the
assistant
chief
reviews,
the
cases
just
like
we
did.
You
know
the
statements
interviews,
videos,
whatever
the
assistant
chief,
makes
his
or
her
recommendation,
then
the
chief
and
right
now
that's
chief
tucker.
He
does
the
same
thing.
He
goes
through
the
case
reviews.
H
F
H
He
sends
a
memo
and
explains
you
know.
I
found
a
violation
or
I
didn't
find
a
violation,
and
you
were
the
opposite,
and
here
here
was
my
process:
okay,
and
that's
how
we
found
out
that
one
time
that
that
there
had
been
a
report
filed,
it
was
just
filed
incorrectly
or
they
hadn't,
founded
it
timely
for
us,
but
it
was
in
the
it
was
in
the
file.
So
so,
if
the,
if
there
is
a
disagreement,
I
I
and
you
have
questions
about
that.
H
I
think
those
questions
would
be
better
directed
at
the
chief
because
he's
the
one
that
ultimately
decided
he's
the
final
say
so
I
mean
we
could
certainly
provide.
You
know
case
information
to
the
commit
the
council
or
to
you
if
you're
spearheading
that
effort,
and
then
you
could
have
a
sit
down
with
the
chief
because
park
really
wouldn't
have
you
know
a?
We
don't
have
a
dog
in
that
fight,
so
to
speak.
I.
G
C
H
H
It
talks
about
what
the
committee
does.
They
get
a
case.
They
review
the
case
if
they
think
there's
additional
information
that
that's
needed
or
additional
investigation,
that's
needed.
They,
the
ch.
The
committee,
as
a
group,
sends
the
case
back
to
the
chief
or
to
the
cpd
and
says
you
know,
we'd,
like
more
investigation.
H
You
know
we
heard
there
were
10
witnesses,
but
we
heard
we
saw
only
five
statements.
What
happened
to
those
other
five
people?
That's
a
hypothetical
it
has
not
ever
happened,
but
and
we
have
never
sent
a
case
back,
requesting
additional
information
to
date,
but
but
in
the
ordinance.
So
it's
confusing
and
it's
inconsistent
in
the
one
section.
It
says
that
I
as
the
chair
would
decide.
Oh
there
needs
to
be
more
investigation
and
that
cuts
out.
H
It's
just
inconsistent
and
I
don't
think
that's
what
the
the
council
intended.
I
don't
think
they
intended
for
one
person
to
make
that
decision,
and
so
that
would
be
a
way
to
clean
the
clean
up
the
ordinance
and
just
remove
that
I
mean.
Obviously
you
know
the
council
would
have
to
review
it
and
decide
with
the
city
attorney
on
whether
that
changes
anything
in
a
different
place.
H
But
that
would
be
one
area
that
I
think
it
could
be
cleaned
up
a
little
bit.
The
bigger
issue,
I
think,
is
that
throughout
the
ordinance
it
just
talks
about
citizen
complaint,
citizen,
complaint,
citizen
complaint,
but
we
know
because
we've
had
this
discussion-
that
you
want
us
to
review
any
case.
That's
brought
against
a
police
officer
whether
it
was
seen
or
experienced
by
a
citizen
or
not
because,
as
we
know,
when
an
officer
is
involved
in
a
use
of
force
or
a
pursuit,
they
have
to
do
a
report.
H
Well,
a
citizen
might
not
have
been
aggrieved
by
that
action,
but
through
the
review
of
those
supervisors
and
chiefs
of
that
report,
they
found
a
violation
of
a
policy
and
it
could
have
been
well.
The
pursuit
was
was
initiated
properly,
but
at
a
point
the
officer
should
have
called
it
off
because
of
all
these
reasons
that
are
in
their
pursuit
policy.
So
I
think
to
be
clear
and
to
to
affect
the
intent
I
think
of
this
ordinance,
which
is
to
review
all
issues
as
they
relate
to
police
conduct.
G
A
A
A
H
D
H
H
F
H
D
H
Attending
the
meetings
helps
you
understand
what
we're
doing
and,
and
you
can
ask
questions
dee
visser,
one
of
our,
I
think,
she's
district
one.
Maybe
is
she
she
yours
so
she
attended
before
she
had
been
through
the
citizens
academy
and
done
her
ride-alongs
and
done
her.
The
active
shooter
drill
that
we
have
to
do
and
she
could
ask
questions
she
just
couldn't
vote,
but
it
really
helped
her
navigate
the
process
better
because
she
understood
what
we
were
doing
when
she
was
able
to
to
formally
vote.
H
So
I'm
gonna
do
better
and
I'm
gonna
ask
the
next
chair
to
make
sure
that
anytime
there's
a
new
person.
You
know
they
need
to
be
told,
but
if
you
could
individually,
you
know
help
remind
them
that
once
they're
nominated
and
they
are
on
the
committee
just
because
they
can't
vote,
they
should
still
attend
meetings.
H
F
D
And
so
I
think,
probably
if
someone
is
appointed
they're
required
to
attend
even
if
it's
their
learning
or
probationary
period
or
whatever
they
they
should
attend.
So
my
colleagues
may
disagree,
but
if
you
would,
if
you
would
put
that
forward,
maybe
in
whatever
the
chair
has
asked
you
to
send
us.
That
would
be
helpful.
Sure
thanks,
kate.
B
G
With
that
red
line
format,
if
we
could
once
you
get
that
to
us
or
to
karen
and
karen
gets
it
to
us,
could
we
also
get
the
attorney
to
go
ahead
and
start
creating
the
the
house
cleaning
situation
to
where
we're
creating
a
better
ordinance
than
we
have
now
with
the
things
that
they
have
found
out,
and
then
we
can
get
that
to
us
so
that
we
can
start
getting
ready
to
put
it
into
some
type
of
committee.
So
we
can
start
to
vote
on
it.
H
G
Certainly,
and
that's
what
I
was
going
to
say
with
some
of
the
conditions
that
have
been
added,
the
councilman
carol
has
talked
about
and
councilman
leffert.
I
would
definitely
like
to
see
that
come
up
again
and
as
a
question
will
we
have
to
have
another
committee
for
that
to
review,
or
would
you
want
to
put
that
on
the
agenda
and
move
forward
with
it?
Or
would
you
want
to
have
another
committee
on
that
to
the
council,
another
committee?
G
Okay,
so
once
we
receive
that
redline
copy
from
city
attorney,
then
we
will
set
up
another
committee
meeting
so
that
we
can
review
and
have
some
discussion
about
it,
and
then
we
will
move
forward
from
there.
Is
that,
okay
with
everyone,
perfect?
Okay,
all
right,
I
see
no
more
questions.
Miss
baker.
Do
you
have
anything
else
to
bring
to
us?
No,
I
don't
man
look
forward
to
seeing
those
changes
and
thank
you
so
much
for
your
service.
Thank
you
and
tell
your
team
park.
We
say
thank
you
as
well.