►
From YouTube: GF Open PDK
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Yes,
we
have
the
room
for
most
of
the
day.
We
have
a
lunch
reservation
at
12
just
across
the
courtyard,
so
we
can
do
one
more
talk,
break
for
lunch
and
then
come
back
and
I
think
we
have
a
meeting
at
1
30.
So
we
should
be
able
to
get
the
last
three
remaining
in
before
then
any
sound
good.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Yeah
I
apologize
it's
about
running
behind,
so
our
next
presentation
is
Karthik
Chandra
grassaren
from
Global
foundries
in
Malta,
New
York,
my
hometown
area,
and
he's
going
to
talk
to
us
about
the
progress
and
announcement
of
their
open
source
pdk
for
180..
So
Karthik.
C
C
So,
first,
just
to
start
I,
don't
know
how
many
of
you
know
about
global
foundries,
but
I
wanted
to.
This
is
a
chart
that
we
show
in
a
lot
to
a
lot
of
our
customers,
where
foundries
are
essential
part
of
what
the
entire
ecosystem
today
is.
If
you
compare
together
what
the
global
GDP
is
at
89
in
about
more
than
close
to
three
percent
of
it
is
driven
by
electronics
and
about
three
percent
of
that
is
underpinned
by
just
five
foundries
of
scale.
C
Today,
that's
almost
like
the
five
foundries
which
have
a
market
size
of
about
96
billion
dollars,
are
actually
driving
about
2.2
trillion
of
this.
This
became
more
apparent
during
the
pandemic,
as
as
we
went
through
shortages
and
things
like
that,
and
that's
one
of
the
key
things.
Foundry
forms
a
significant
part
of
the
ecosystem
and
foundries
are
growing
at
about
six
point.
Six
percent
keger
compared
to
what
the
global
GDP
is
growing
at.
C
And
Global
foundries,
as
the
name
suggests
by
itself,
it's
truly
Global.
If
you
look
at
it,
we
have
like
a
significant
footprint
spread
out
across
the
world.
Of
course,
in
the
US
we
have
our
Malta
New
York
facility,
which
has
like
significant
capacity.
We
do
have
Singapore,
we
have
Germany,
we
have
Burlington
in
the
U.S
and
also
an
upcoming
facility
in
Kroll
and
France,
in
partnership
with
SD,
micro,
okay
and
in
terms
of
Technologies
as
well
GF.
C
Just
to
give
a
perspective,
we
are
not
in
the
in
the
race
for
single
node
transistors,
we
pivoted
at
12
nanometer,
but
we
have
a
wide
range
of
things.
That
is
purpose-built
like
what
we
call
as
purpose-built
platforms
for
a
wide
range
of
applications
from
feature-rich
mainstream
CMOS
devices,
high
voltage
power
management,
embedded
non-volatile
memory
devices
to
finfet,
which
is
our
12
nanometer
platform.
C
We
do
have
a
unique
FDX,
which
is
a
fully
depleted
Sy
solution,
and
then
we
do
have
a
wide
range
of
partially
depleted
Sy
Solutions,
which
are
very
unique
in
RF,
low
power,
low
noise,
low
latency
high
frequencies,
and
also
we
are
the
market
leader
in
Silicon
photonics.
Today,
especially
in
300
millimeter,
we
have
a
unique
photonics
platform,
which
is
actually
one
of
the
best
today
Best
in
Class
in
the
industry.
C
We
do
have
significant
capacity
in
our
Burlington
facility,
doing
silicon
germanium
still,
which
women
in
the
power
amplifier
and
very
high
frequency
application
and
last
we
are
also
investing
and
we
continue
to
grow
our
gallium
nitride
business.
So
we
have
a
very
strong
feature-rich
platform
that
is
part
part
of
our
platform
and
to
talk
about
why
GF
is
doing
open
source
when
we
decided
to
do
open
source.
C
Google
is
an
example
where
we
do
see
large
companies
who
see
open
source
as
a
way
to
accelerate
Innovation
and
customization
they're,
doing
various
things
using
open
source
tools
to
be
able
to
accelerate
Innovation
which
are
not
possible
without
having
access
to
an
open,
open
Flow
where
they
can
customize
and
use
unlimited
number
of
licenses.
Things
like
that,
so
we
are
seeing
test
cases
on
both
sides
of
it
in
the
initial
phase.
I
think
this
would
be
the
key
customer
base
that
we
would
be
attacking.
C
In
terms
of
Open,
Source
and
GF
technology,
we
started
with
that
180
nanometer
in
our
current
state.
All
our
all
our
Technologies
require
our
customers
to
have
ndas
in
return
for
pdks
reference
flows
for
them
to
work
with
that
IP
and
Eda
Partners
to
get
access
to
it
and
GF
180
MCU,
thanks
to
Google
any
fabulous
and
everybody.
We
have
like
a
complete
open
source
platform
today,
and
this
was
released
by
Google
and
e-fabulous.
Open
source
in
August
2022,
so
180
MCU
I
do
want
to
stress
is
the
first
technology
in
our
roadmap.
C
Again,
thanks
to
the
team,
mpw0
submissions
closed
in
the
first
week
of
December
and
we
were,
and
given
even
a
short
window
and
a
short
time
frame
for
us
to
do
designs
for
our
designs
to
come,
and
thanks
to
all
the
hard
work
from
Google
and
efab
list,
we
were
able
to
get
up
to
90
designs
and
based
on
current
plans.
C
Talk
a
little
bit
about
our
180
MCU
Solutions
as
such
Why
did.
We
choose
180
MCU
as
such.
If
you
think
about
it,
we
have
like
a
large
Corridor
in
Singapore,
which
is
our
gigafab.
We
ship
about
more
than
a
million
200
millimeter
Wafers
today
and
mcus
and
general
purpose.
C
For
instance,
they
ship
millions
of
Wafers
just
for
toys,
so
it
is
a
big
market
and
the
requirements
for
these
are
still
very,
very,
very,
very
simple.
There
are
people
out
there.
Even
shipping
8051
microcontrollers
8051
based
microcontrollers
insignificant
volume
as
of
today,
and
this
shift
is
slowly
happening
to
very
low
power,
optimized
32-bit,
micro,
microcontrollers,
and
things
like
that.
C
So
this
is
a
very
sweet
spot
and
it's
a
very
cost
effective
Solutions,
especially
looking
at
where
we
are
attacking
in
terms
of
Open
Source
tools
and
for
people
to
go,
innovate
and
try
things
in
volume
production.
Today,
a
single
gate
oxide,
with
a
single
gate
oxide
we
can
achieve
3.3,
volt
and
5
volt,
and
it
only
requires
14
masking
layers.
C
This
is
for
the
three
metal
layer
is
Baseline,
and
this
requires
only
14
last
layers,
which
means
faster
turnaround
time
cheaper
in
cost
for
our
for
our
customers
and
getting
on
an
mpw
shuttle
is
like
so
cheap
for
them
to
go
test
their
designs
and
go
to
full
volume.
C
Production
and
the
mass
costs
are
sub
100K
for
them
to
even
go
into
full
volume
production,
which
kind
of
makes
it
a
sweet
spot
for
them
to
be
able
to,
even
at
a
lot
smaller
volume,
to
be
able
to
make
Asics
as
a
very
possible
option
and
it's
extremely
design
friendly
with
the
extensive
design
offerings
and
very
compact
IP
Solutions.
We
have
standard
cells,
memory,
compilers,
e-fuses,
iOS,
otps
mtps,
all
of
these
available
as
part
of
the
platform
right.
This
is
a
busy
slide.
C
I
want
to
go
I,
don't
want
to
go
through
every
detail
of
it,
but
180
MCU
with
a
single
work
function,
single
gate
oxide.
We
can
achieve
both
3.3
volt
and
5
volt,
offering
and
in
terms
of
rules.
Today,
our
first
mpw
shuttle
was
predominantly
targeted
at
5
volt,
but
we're
working
with
Google
to
see
how
we
can
enable
3.3
volt
for
the
further
along
for
the
text
mpws,
especially
one
of
the
few
advantages.
As
you
can
see
there,
some
cell
size
drops
dramatically
in
the
bottom
left.
C
If
you
can
see
cell
size
drops
to
about
half
it's
about,
like
6.96
Micron
Square
on
a
3.3
volt
cell,
compared
to
a
180
MCO
5
volt,
which
is
at
about
13
and
a
half
Micron
Square,
so
you're
gonna
see
very
small
in
terms
of
memory
macros
to
generate
those
arrays
as
you
get
down
to
this.
So
that's
one
area
we're
trying
to
get
down
to
it
and,
of
course,
with
the
3.3
volt
you're,
going
to
see
significant
Improvement
in
your
Dynamic
power.
C
While
your
static
is
almost
very
close
to
what
the
firewall
does
and
line
spacing
area
spacing
as
well,
you
get
like
a
certain
amount
of
shrink,
so
you
should
be
able
to
get
a
little
bit
more
area
on
it
and
those
are
exact
reasons
why
we're
starting
to
also
enable
3.3
volt,
maybe
in
the
maybe
in
the
very
shortly
we
do
offer
multiple
different
backend
options,
depending
on
what
the
ask
is
or
what
the
requirements
are.
There
are
other
other
options
of
the
technology
as
well
in
terms
of
memcaps
Poly,
High
resistors.
C
In
terms
of
platform,
IP
Solutions
I
know
initially,
currently
we
only
support
Global
foundries
maintain
standard
cells,
and
we
also
have
Professor
James
Stein's
osu's
standard
cells
also
available
as
the
five
volt.
But,
as
you
can
see
on
the
top
right,
there
is
a
wide
range
of
third-party
ecosystem
Partners,
whether
it's
e-memory
M31
YMC,
who
have
like
standard
cells,
memory,
compilers,
iOS,
e-fuses,
otps,
mtps
available
in
it.
C
So
maybe
in
the
next
future,
we're
gonna,
see
3.3
volt
standard
cells
and
memory
compilers
from
our
third
party
IP,
as
well
as
like
otps
and
ntps,
be
made
available
to
the
community
shortly
right,
and
here
also
we've
compared
some
of
the
standard
cells
and
memory
compilers
between
different
the
3.3
volt
and
the
5
volt
the
3.3
volt.
C
Given
we
also
have
11
Track
library
in
terms
of
gate
density,
it's
comparable
to
the
firewall,
but
again
because
of
the
lower
voltage
you're
going
to
get
a
better
power
with
the
same
kind
of
density
on
a
memory
compiler,
definitely
you're
going
to
get
less
than
half
the
area
of
what
the
current
memory
is
offered
and
also
the
current
memory
is
more
like
we
at
least
three
four
instances:
you're
also
going
to
get
a
compiler
capability
with
the
3.3
volt,
wherein
people
would
be
able
to
generate
their
own
compilers.
C
C
As
we
go
through
this
and
given
the
quieter
Community
here,
I
do
want
to
discuss
a
little
bit
as
we
are
discussing
our
commercialization
strategy
within
our
business
units,
our
sales
teams.
What
does
the
ecosystem
need?
So
we
asked
one
thing:
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
understands
this
commercialization
of
Open
Source
is
getting
closer.
We
are
talking
indirectly
to
our
customers
and
there
are
customers
out
there
who
have
given
us
a
list
of
things
that
they
would
like
to
see,
but
they
would.
They
are
getting
closer
to
me.
C
Making
open
source
Staples
using
open
source,
complete
open
source
tools
and
IP
may
be
as
early
as
2023.
So
there
is
a
long
tail
of
customers
are
considering
this
as
a
very
viable
options,
and
the
ask
to
the
community
is
for
any
customer
who's.
Doing
a
commercial
tape
out
using
open
source
tools
definitely
requires
a
support
model
for
Eda
tools.
It's
one
thing
that
we
do
know
about
Hardware
designers
with
a
slightly
different
than
software
designers.
Is
they
do
there?
Is
a
big
threshold
for
them
to
get
everything
right
in
the
first?
C
So
we
do
see
this
as
a
must
requirement
for
us
to
be
able
to
provide
open
source
Eda
tools
to
become
commercially
viable
again.
The
next
one
is
open
source
IP
thanks
to
Google
and
the
Googles
of
mpw
sponsored
shuttle
program,
as
well
as
like
the
E
fabulous
trip
ignite
program,
Open
Source
IP
is
getting
developed
at
a
rapid
Pace.
C
We
do
see
a
lot
of
Ip
tag,
games
and
various
things
getting
developed
and
for
the
previous
start,
like
Messi,
talked
about,
like
all
the
interesting
things
he's
doing,
how
do
we
make
them
ready
for
commercial
type
of
trick?
We
do
need
like
I
know.
A
lot
of
the
IP
is
available
out
there.
People
can
go
access
it,
how
you
can
find
it,
but
we
do
need
a
catalog
or
a
Marketplace
to
aggregate
all
the
IP.
We
do
need
standardization
of
documentation,
standardization,
of
how
design
collaterals
maintain
how
the
dot
labs
are.
C
Everything
is
available.
The
GDs
has
provided
all
of
that
needs
to
be
done.
Version
Control,
with
bug
fixes
improvements,
all
the
Silicon
reports
being
available
at
a
certain
part
and
any
any
inputs
on
where
if
these
IPS
have
been
used
in
commercial
in
products-
and
it's
been
silicon
proven
all
this
needs
to
be
documented.
C
So
we
do
need
a
way
for
certain
certain
all
these
two
happen,
ideally
a
support
model
or
companies
and
startups
evolving,
who
are
able
to
take
this
open
source
IP
and
create
this
Marketplace
and
ecosystem
that
also
provides
services
for
customizations
integration.
Support.
Silicon
debug
needed
as
a
support
model
as
a
service.
This
is
something
that
will
be
required
if
we'll
have
to
make
open
source
IPS
as
a
reality
to
be
commercialized.
C
There
are
customers
who
are
willing
to
willing
to
take
it
at
risk.
Try
it
in
an
mpw
but
realistically,
given
the
lead
time
and
all
of
it,
some
amount
of
ecosystem
evolving
around
it
is
required,
and
the
third
part
of
the
ecosystem
that
we
are
getting
inputs
from
customers
is.
They
want
dedicated
skilled
resources
who
can
provide
Design
Services
they?
C
It
doesn't
have
to
be
a
complete
designed
someone
to
take
a
complete
design
and
provide
all
the
way
from
RTL
to
GDs
or
provide
services
and
very
long
or
provide
services,
and
things
like
that.
But
there
are,
we
are
hearing
from
people
that
they
might
require.
Specific
things
like
do.
I
have
a
skill
resource
that
I
can
hire
for
a
few
months,
who
can
provide
CAD
support
with
all
these
Eda
tools,
because
we
do
not
know
how
to
get
this
entire
Camp
setup
done.
C
Can
can
someone
help
us
with
providing
just
timing
closure
to
make
sure
with
these
open
source
tools,
how
everything
works?
Do
a
timing
sign
off
and
all
of
that
stuff?
So
all
these
kind
of
things
are
required,
so
we
are
hoping
a
vibrant
ecosystem
is
what
will
be
the
final
step
in
making
open
source
a
reality
for
commercialization,
and
we
do
request
the
community
to
step
up
to
help
in
these
regards.
C
This
is
one
last
slide
that
I
will
leave
you
with
and
really
one
of
the
future
state
that
we
enabled
with
open
source.
We
do
think
is
a
easy
way
for
people
to
be
able
to
access
and
do
business
with
us.
We
do
expect
that
in
the
short
term,
not
very
far
away,
we
do
expect
we
all.
C
If
it's
a
software
as
a
service
compute,
all
of
it,
and
whether
it's
open
source
tools,
as
well
as
like
a
mix
of
commercial
tools
required
in
the
flow
all
that
is
available
and
people
with
no
human
interaction
as
a
very
low
Touch
model
being
able
to
design
an
order
Wafers,
this
is
not
very
far
from
reality.
We
do
expect
this
to
be
enabled
not
too
far
away.
A
Thanks
so
much
Karthik
for
a
great
chat,
any
questions
from
the
audience
here
or
online.
B
Thanks
Karthik
for
the
presentation,
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
Actually,
so
the
first
one
is:
do
you
have
memory
compilers
that.