►
Description
Call To Order 00:00:00
Staff Introductions 00:00:29
TIP Amendment Consent Item 00:13:16
Minutes 00:14:01
West Central Vt. Comprehensive Dev. Strategy 00:19:34
Energy Sub-committee to Long Range Planning 00:40:30
FY24 Nominations to Board Dev. Committee 00:42:09
Equity Update 00:44:43
Chair/ED Updates 00:46:57
Total Run Time: 00:55:37
https://linktr.ee/townmeetingtv
Town Meeting TV is a free speech forum and the ideas expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the Town Meeting TV trustees and staff. If you have a different perspective to share, we invite you to join the conversation! Create your own program or cover a community meeting or event. Contact maketv@cctv.org or call 862-3966.
Thank you for tuning into Town Meeting TV! Please subscribe to our YouTube channel and visit our website for more videos and information about how we open the doors to local government using community media. www.Ch17.TV
This video belongs to http://www.cctv.org and published with permission under Creative Commons License CCTV Center for Media & Democracy Programming is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A
B
C
D
D
D
So
in
most
of
my
time
as
a
planner
I've
worked
as
the
town
planner
for
Essex
I'm,
doing
lots
of
different
things,
mostly
development
review,
but
trying
to
get
some
time
to
work
on
housing
needs
assessments.
I
have
Urban,
Tree
maintenance
and
urban
forestry.
Other
conservation
work.
What
else
working
on
the
enhanced
strategy
plan
A
lot
of
times
spent
on
merger
in
the
sense
of
you
know,
working
on
joint
efforts
that
still
were
worthwhile,
regardless
of
the
outcome
of
that?
D
E
D
We
are
pretty
close
to
done
with
one
for
Williston
and
then
I'm
also
working
on
one
for
Hinesburg,
mostly
routine
updates,
but
also
all
you
know
important
to
sort
of
talk
about
housing
in
the
context
at
the
moment
and
how
dire
everything
is,
but
also
there's
a
lot
of
really
good
work
happening
in
both
those
municipalities
and
really
strong
efforts
to
to
meet
the
need.
I.
E
D
D
Yeah,
it's
not
exactly
a
build
out.
Analysis,
that's
a
whole
other
can
of
worms,
but
we
are
looking
a
little
bit
at
sort
of
what
exists
today.
The
general
trend
of
what
we
expect
in
the
future-
and
you
know
General
sense
of
demand
and
sort
of
gives
a
scale
of
like.
Are
we
talking
you
know?
Do
we
need
tens
of
units
or
hundreds
of
units
or
thousands
of
units
to
meet
demand?
But
it's
also
looking
at
affordability
in
the
sense
of
you
know.
D
Are
you
meeting
the
income
thresholds
for
people
or,
if
you
folks,
you
know
stuck
out
at
the
bottom?
Are
you
having
enough
renter
housing
versus
owner
housing
and
the
size?
You
know
the
number
of
bedrooms,
the
context,
the
Supportive
Services.
You
know
it's
a
whole
comprehensive.
Look
at
everything.
D
E
E
D
So
the
good
news
for
Hinesburg
is
that
they're
kind
of
already
doing
a
lot
of
what
they
should
be
doing,
which
is
you
know,
compact
growth,
planning,
water
and
waste
water
funding
and
making
sure
that
they're
they
have
an
inclusionary
zoning
provision.
So
some
of
that's
affordable,
they're
doing
a
lot
of
great
Partnerships
with
non-profits
like
Champaign
Housing
Trust,
but
in
Cathedral
Square,
so
still
working
on
what
else
they
could
be
doing
but
yeah
generally
looking
at
you
know
a
lot
more
of
the
same.
A
F
F
C
F
G
F
Didn't
get
to
work
with
you?
No
you!
You
might
soon
I'm
working
on
a
project
there
this
next
year,
so
we
can
talk
about
that.
Super
I
worked
at
Northwest,
Regional,
Planning
Commission
after
that
for
six
years
as
a
planner
senior
planner.
So
when
I
moved
to
ccrbc,
it
was
pretty
much
the
same
job
just
in
a
more
urban
context.
F
F
The
Milton
project
I'll
be
working
on
actually
doing
RFP
right
now
for
Milton
to
select
a
consultant
for
a
downtown
core
charette
project
that
we'll
be
doing
hopefully
starting
the
summer
and
the
next
fall
to
do
a
master
plan,
essentially
for
the
downtown
core
that'll
lead
into.
Hopefully
a
zoning
project
after
that
so
yeah
I,
I,
dabble
mostly
in
land
use
and
energy
planning.
But
can
can
also
work
on
on
a
whole
bunch
of
other
issues.
So
any
questions
for
me.
E
How
how
valuable
do
you
find
the
charrette's
Taylor?
In
other
words,
it
seems
like
part
of
the
public
participation
process,
but
in
the
long
run,
are
you
really
just
getting
a
small
group
of
folks
visioning?
You
know
going
at
maps
with
sharpies
and
you
know
having
Pie
in
the
Sky
approaches
to
things
or
is
it
more
directed?
Do
you
actually
know
the
answer
before
you
really
come
in
there
and
hand
everybody
a
Sharpie.
F
I
I
I,
don't
think
so.
You
know
I've
never
led
a
charette
I'm.
Typically
the
the
staff
person
who's
mentioned,
the
consultant
who's
doing
the
charette
and
so
I
might
be
helping
them
with
some
sort
of
like
subgroups
or
you
know,
helping
with
engagement
in
some
way,
but
I
find
the
engagement
or
the
Shrek
process
really
important,
Chris,
because
I
think
it's
a
good
way
to
break
the
public
down
into
really
small
groups
and
have
the
public
actually
talk
to
themselves
and
work
out
ideas
amongst
themselves.
F
I
think
it's
a
good
way
to
get
a
lot
of
ideas
very
quickly.
I
think
that
really
worked
really
well
in
Williston
during
Taft
Corners,
form-based
code
project,
for
instance,
and
that
was
digital
too-
that
wasn't
even
in
person
I
like
that
charettes
are
really
intensive
over
a
very
short
window,
which
there
isn't
a
lot
of
time
to
overthink.
It's
a
lot
of
time
to
just
talk
to
people
and
or
mostly
listen
to
people
and
gather
ideas
from
a
really
broad
set
of
folks.
F
Obviously,
how
many
people,
how
many
folks
show
up
the
table
is
really
contingent
upon
how
much
time
you
you
prep,
and
what
sort
of
you
know
Outreach
you're
doing
and
you
know
I
think
ccrpc
can
always
help
with
that.
But
it's
always
great
to
work
with
the
municipality
and
Municipal
staff
that
are
really
good
at
that
and
know
who
to
talk
to
and
what
sort
of
groups
I
typically
are
at
the
table.
So
we
can
make
sure
that
we
get
them
to
the
table
during
a
shred
process.
E
Great,
thank
you
because
I
think
it's
important
when
we're
talking
about
you
know
our
efforts
with
the
equity
in
trying
to
get
representation
from
the
people
who
can
perhaps
not
have
been
at
the
table
that
you
know
and
I'm
hopeful
that
you
know
the
the
end
result
of
a
charette
isn't
necessarily
written
in
concrete
as
I
often
imagine
it
is
and
I
think
the
people
at
the
charettes
imagine
it
is
so
I,
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
But
thank
you.
A
A
E
H
I
A
A
I
I
I
I
It's
rather
that
that
there
is
a
final
court
order
requiring
the
towns
of
Underhill
in
Westford
to
allow
access
to
Pro
property
owners
for
all
uses
and
that
those
rights
run
with
the
land
for
their
air
successors
and
signs
it's
a
little
technical.
But
it's
after
years
of
involvement
in
hashing
things
out,
so
it
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear
it's
not
just
that
the
town
has
a
court
order.
It's
actually
that
the
towns,
Underhill
and
Westford
are
subject
to
a
court
order.
C
I
A
H
H
E
A
G
A
F
G
E
F
F
West
Central
Vermont,
it's
an
it's
a
new
geography.
This
isn't
a
geography
that
typically
works
together.
It's
made
out
of
four
separations
Addison
County
Central
Vermont,
Chittenden
County
and
Rutland
County
90
municipalities
about
half
the
state's
population
in
the
past,
Chittenden
County
has
adopted
its
own
sets,
but
this
time
around,
we
were
encouraged
by
Eda
to
work
with
the
three
other
sub-regions
to
adopt
a
seds
together
and
possibly
pursue
creating
an
economic
development
District
in
the
future.
F
So
we
we
decided
to
pursue
this
alternative
path
compared
to
what
we've
done
in
the
past
and
I
think
it's
resulted
in
a
pretty
good
product
work
to
date.
We
did
a
lot
of
Engagement
over
the
course
of
two
plus
years
of
writing.
This
writing
the
sets
we
held.
Some
public
workshops
we
held
some
focus
groups
with
specific
communities.
Most
notably
members
of
the
bypoc
business
community
did
the
in
cooperation
with
Vermont
Professionals
of
color
network,
notably
this
past
summer.
F
We
also
did
work
to
create
an
economic
profile
for
the
region,
that's
one
of
the
appendices
of
of
the
sets,
and
that
is
just
a
full
data
dump
of
demographic
information,
information
related
to
jobs
related
to
wages
related
to
home
ownership
related
to
child
care.
It's
100
plus
page
document,
and
we
did
it
in
the
beginning
of
this
process
to
really
understand
the
context.
F
The
economic
context
of
the
region,
we're
also
required
by
Eda
within
the
seds,
to
do
a
traditional
swap
analysis,
strengths,
weaknesses,
opportunities
and
threats,
and
we
also
decided
to
do
a
soar
which
is
strengths,
opportunities
aspirations
and
results,
and
that
really
helped
us
develop
kind
of
data
indicators
which
we'll
talk
about
in
a
little
bit
within
the
set
itself
measures
by
which
we
can.
We
can
measure
how
successful
or
unsuccessful
we
are
being
in
terms
of
Economic
Development.
F
Here
in
West
Central
Vermont,
we
developed
a
draft
sets
that
was
available
back
in
June.
It
made
some
revisions
had
a
second
draft
available
in
November
during
the
courses
project.
We
also
have
been
working
on
bylaws
in
case
the
partners
decide
to
be
an
economic
development
District.
So
it's
another
deliverable
that'll
be
forthcoming
that
you
guys
will
see
if
we
pursue
this
option
later
this
summer
next
fall
and,
of
course,
we
completed
a
final
sets
on
February
1st
key
findings.
F
I
think
you
guys
already
reviewed
these
key
findings
with
Regina
back
in
July,
so
I'll
move
relatively
quickly,
but
you
know,
as
you
can
imagine,
looking
at
that
map,
you
know.
West
Central
Vermont
is
is
kind
of
the
economic
heart
of
the
State,
with
chitton
County,
really
being
the
center
of
of
economic
activity
and
population
and
population
growth,
I
believe
not
only
half
the
population
but
I
believe
well
over
half
of
State
GDP
within
our
geography.
F
F
F
We
know
that
this
region,
through
some
work
we
did
with
the
UVM
office
for
engagement.
Looking
at
next
code
information,
we
know
that
our
region
has
hot,
very
high
location,
quotients
for
very
specific
value-added
agricultural
products
and
very
Niche
manufacturing.
So
we
identify
that,
as
you
know,
two
areas
of
the
economy
we
can
build
upon
in
the
future.
C
F
There
remains
a
gender
wage
Gap
and
really
the
key
that
we
identified
in
terms
of
of
the
focus
of
our
sets
and
they're.
Implementing
our
sexually
should
be
on
infrastructure
and
specifically,
an
infrastructure
on
infrastructure
and
areas
planned
for
growth,
and
you
know,
sort
of
those
things
that
are
peripheral
to
more
traditional
water,
Wastewater
infrastructure,
which
is
you
know,
thinking
about
housing
and
and
essential
services
like
child
carers,
infrastructure.
F
F
Our
second
goal
was
focused
on
Equity.
A
lot
of
the
the
actions
under
that
Equity
goal
come
from
Consulting
with
our
EAC
and
working
with
Vermont
Professionals
of
color
Network,
who
reviewed
our
sets.
You
know,
actions
we
have
is
is
are
really
focused
on
making
sure
that
we
continue
engagement
with
these
communities
and
underrepresented.
F
We
also
identify
that
we
should
have
some
sort
of
prioritization
for
for
trying
to
fund
projects
that
address
Equity
if
we
seek
any
Eda
funding
in
the
future
and
that
we
need
better
data
about
who
we're
serving
when
we
do
access
grant
funding
and
potentially
sub-grant
funds
to
to
businesses,
Business
Development
job
creation
was
also
very
important
like
most
sets.
We
identify.
Entrepreneurship
is
something
we
need
to
support
and
the
rdcs
our
RDC
Partners
were
also
very
much
focused
on
this
idea
of
economic
gardening.
F
Workforce
Development
I'll
skip
over
that
really
quick,
it's
in
the
news
enough,
but
that
employer
retention,
we're
identified
as
really
important
goals,
infrastructure,
resilience,
specific
actions
related
to
the
transportation
Network
about
utilities
and
about
the
need
for
electrification
and
how
that's
going
to
impact
our
our
transmission
and
our
distribution
grid
and
then
a
lot
of
focus.
You
know,
particularly
with
our
more
rural
Partners,
about
trying
to
find
uses
for
underutilized
sites,
and
so
this
could
be
schools
that
have
closed
since
merger.
F
So
I
haven't
asked
you
to
adopt
a
resolution,
but
if
you
are
interested
in
looking
at
the
sets
itself,
it
is
located
at
West,
Central,
Vermont
or
West
Central
vt.org
in
terms
of
next
steps,
all
the
partners.
So
all
eight
Partners,
the
regional
planning
commissions
and
Regional
development
corporations
are
considering
adoption
of
this
document.
A
F
We
can
talk
more
about
that
in
a
second,
if
you
want-
or
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
on
this
slide.
So
an
economic
development
District
all
other
parts
of
Vermont
are
covered
by
one,
except
for
this
Four
County
region
and
the
two
counties
down
south
which
have
submitted
an
application
that
hasn't
been
approved
yet.
But
the
idea
behind
creating
an
EDD
is
is
a
few
things.
One
is
just
continual
collaboration
with
our
partners
that
we've
worked
this
on
the
sets
with,
and
the
second
thing
is
really
related
to
funding.
F
You
know
this
EDD
could
be
an
entity
that
could
draw
down
specific
Eda
funds
and
it
may
be
easier
for
the
EDD
to
do
that
than
some
of
our
our
partners
in
terms
of
their
ability
to
do
that,
and
these
three
bullets
planning
technical
assistance,
Public
Works
disaster
supplemental
are
just
some
examples
of
different
Eda
Grant
programs
that
are
available
that
this
EDD
could
could
apply.
For
so
that's
what
I
have
for
you
this
evening.
Jeff.
You
have
a
question
yeah.
H
Yeah
that
just
makes
no
economic
sense
because
of
the
commuter
relationships
between
Chittenden
County
as
an
employment
center
and
where
people
live
and
we
have
I
I
doubt
we
have
any
relationship
with
Orange
County
or
you
know,
or
even
Rutland
County.
So
it's
disappointing
that
they
encouraged
us
to
do
this,
but
that's
just
so.
We
can
compete
for
federal
funds.
B
H
H
I,
just
it,
and
so
my
second
question
is
moot
because
I
was
going
to
tell
you
that
the
labor
department
just
updated
rebenchmarked
all
their
jobs
by
place
of
work
survey
and
that
doesn't
obviously
apply
to
ACS,
because
that's
a
survey
of
employed
residents,
not
the
number
of
jobs.
So
those
people
can
hold
multiple
jobs
and
it's
by
where
they
live.
So
somebody
could
be
in
Rutland
County
and
hold
the
job
in
bettington.
County
and
they'd
be
counted
as
employed
in
Rutland
County
yep.
F
F
H
Yeah
I
think
I
looked
at
it
a
month
ago
and
I
think
it
was
ACS
data,
but
you
lose
the
whole
commuter
Dynamic.
When
you
look
at
people
who
hold
jobs
by
where
they
live,
you
don't
really
marry
it
very
well
with
the
economy.
So
your
location
quotients,
are
not
real
location
quotients,
because
location
quotients
are
jobs
by
place
of
work,
not
by
employed
residents
generally.
But
that's,
okay.
It's
a
you
know:
it'll
we're
just
being
able
to
step
up
to
the
plate
to
to
compete
for
federal
funds.
H
It's
that
the
labor
department,
re-benchmarks
the
employment
date
and
the
real
interesting
thing
that
happened
in
this
rebenchmarking,
because
they're
starting
to
put
the
2000
census
into
the
employment,
the
employment
surveys
for
the
household
side
and
they're
updating
they've
been
updating
all
the
data.
Most
of
the
updates,
because
they've
discovered
that
there's
more
jobs
in
the
Vermont
economy
than
they
were
counting
over
the
last
couple
years,
since
the
covet
pandemic
has
happened
outside
of
Chittenden
County,
which
I
thought
was
fascinating.
More
than
95
percent
of
the
changes.
H
All
the
upward
changes
have
happened
outside
of
our
County,
so
that
hasn't
always
been
the
case
and
we've
been
running
around
talking
about
how
we
have
two
vermonts
Chittenden
County,
and
then
everything
outside
of
Chittenden
County
and
outside
County
hasn't
even
come
back
to
19
2005
levels.
So,
but
there
was
a
little
bit
more
activity
outside
chicken
County
than
they
originally
counted
when
they
updated
the
employment
by
place
of
work
or
the
jobs
by
place
of
workday.
That's
all.
F
J
Yes,
regarding
Jeff's
comment
about
employment
as
to
whether
you're
working
from
home
or
at
the
employer's
facility,
with
the
Advent
of
online
people
working
remotely.
How
does
that
work
I'm?
Just
thinking
there
are
multiple
companies
outside
the
state
people
work
within
the
state,
how's
that
play
into
the
numbers.
H
Yeah
actually
Dan
I
didn't
say
that
it
was
related
to
remote
working.
It's
where
the
jobs
are
counted
right:
okay,
regardless
of
where
the
person
who's
holding
the
job
live
so
in
a
remote
working
situation,
if
you're
counting
jobs
by
place
of
work.
Even
if
that
person
lives
in
California,
the
job
is
counted
at
the
place
of
employment.
H
If
it's
in
Vermont
and
that's
where
everything
gets
confusing,
because
if
you're
doing
an
analysis
based
on
employed
people
by
where
they
live,
you
lose
where
the
job
is
located
and
that
doesn't
always
that
isn't
always
the
most
helpful
thing
for
economic
development
efforts.
You
really
want
to
know
where
the
jobs
are
located
and
where
the
people
who
hold
the
jobs
are
located.
H
That's
why
it's
so
important
to
have
Franklin
County
with
County,
because
so
many
people
who
hold
jobs
in
Chittenden
County
live
in
Franklin
County
because
of
the
housing
issues
and
the
cost
issues
that
we
have.
So
there's
nothing
really
economic
about
seds,
it's
all
about
checking
all
the
boxes,
so
you
can
compete
for
federal
funds
to
build
wastewater
treatment,
plants
and
Roads,
and
things
like
that.
I.
J
H
J
F
A
H
A
A
Moving
on,
we
have
the
appointment
of
the
energy
subcommittee
to
long-range
planning
committee
and
technically
you
know
we
can
ask
questions
about
it
or
you
can
make
comments,
but
in
the
end
it's
the
chair's
job
too.
According
to
so
we
have
the
it
was
discussed
in
the
executive
committee
and
there
were
10
names
submitted.
A
I
had
actually
put
my
name
in
there
as
well,
because
I
wasn't
because
Melanie
wasn't
sure
she
was
going
to
have
enough,
but
fortunately
there
were
10
and
they
only
need
seven,
so
I'm
not
there
and
on
what
who
is
going
to
be
appointed
is
Jeff
forward
from
Richmond.
He
was
on
the
pass.
He
was
on
the
original
energy
subcommittee
member
Keith
Epstein
from
South
Burlington.
He
also
was
a
past
energy
subcommittee.
A
B
J
H
C
B
B
A
H
Mean
all
kidding
aside,
this
is
a
very
important
committee,
because
this
is
the
farm
team
for
the
board
and
for
the
officers.
Okay.
So
this
is
we
joke
about
it
folks,
but
it's
not
a
laughing
matter.
This
is
for
the
leadership
for
this
committee
for
this
organization,
so
we
take
it
very
seriously.
Well,.
A
B
So
Equity
update
just
some
notes
from
Ann
Nelson
she's
been
working
on
kind
of
operationalizing.
The
equity
advisory
committee
they've
had
their
first
couple
meetings
and
their
meeting
on
the
fourth
Wednesday
of
every
month.
So
we
finally
finally
have
like
a
permanent
meeting
schedule
for
them.
That's
going
well,
they
were
starting
to
work
on
the
a
proposed
project
in
the
upwp.
We'll
talk
more.
A
B
C
B
Think
that
was
a
important
part
for
us
to
figure
out
how
to
be
most
helpful
to
the
municipalities
which
we've
talked
about
before
and
then
there's
some
project
level
work.
You
know
when
does
he
walked,
walk
bike,
master
plan,
The,
Battery,
Street,
Corridor,
study,
South,
Burlington,
climate
action
plan,
where
she's
engaging
there
to
help
with
some
Equity
perspective
on
those
projects?
A
B
All
right
annual
meeting,
we
talked
about
this
at
the
executive
committee
and
decided
that
it
would
be
in
person
again
so
Emma
is
in
the
process
of
finding
a
spot
and
we're
kind
of
I.
Don't
know:
we've
kind
of
fallen
into
a
little
bit
of
pattern
of
got
to
go
Urban
and
then
rural.
So
last
year
we
did
hula
in
Burlington,
so
we're
now
looking
at
some
rural
sites,
so
just
stay
tuned
and
we
will
let
everybody
know
as
soon
as
we
land
on
the
location.
I
B
G
C
E
D
E
A
B
So
anyway,
stay
tuned
for
that
she's
she's,
a
master
at
figuring
it
out.
So
thank
you
Emma
for
that
work.
The
second
quarter
financial
report-
I,
don't
know
how.
Well
you
were
able
to
see
the
giant
spreadsheet
in
your
packet,
I'm
hoping
you
were
able
to
zoom
in
and
blow
it
up,
but
we
really
just
wanted
to
have
that
available
to
you
and
you
know.
Let
us
know
if
you
have
any
questions.
I'll,
sorry,
I'm
scrolling.
B
We're
pretty
much
at
a
balanced
budget
place
right
now,
and
so
we're
you'll
see
the
bottom
line.
If
you
look
at
row,
112
you'll
see
zero
dollars
is
where
we
are
in
terms
of
net
position
right
now,
but
we
usually
have
a
better
second
half
of
the
year
than
we
do
the
first
half
just
because
there's
fewer
vacations
and
holidays
in
this
this
half
of
the
year.
So
any
questions
that
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
row
by
row
unless
you
asked
me
to.
B
B
That's
not
necessarily
important,
but
they're
meeting
the
last
week
of
March
the
29th
29th
next,
and
so
there
should
be
a
draft
tpwp.
You
know
getting
to
the
executive
committee
in
April
and
we'll
review
it
at
the
board
meeting.
Also,
so
you
know,
we've
had
a
good
amount
of
Transportation
Planning
funds.
The
pl
NPO
funds
have
been
increasing
with
the
infrastructure
bill
over
the
last
couple
years,
so
we're
in
decent
shape,
but
there's
also
it
means
there's
more
money.
B
So
we
just
went
through
an
exercise
in
the
last
few
days
of
like
entering
all
of
our
hours
for
the
whole
year
and
seeing
how
it
plays
out
we'll
know
a
lot
more
about
how
it
plays
out
next
week,
so
stay
tuned
and
then
legislative
update,
there's
as
always,
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
Montpelier.
I
will
tell
you.
B
My
attention
has
been
pretty
focused
on
two
major
things
for
rpcs
and
so
and
I
hate
to
be
crass,
but
one
of
them
is
just
about
our
funding
so
yeah.
There
is
still
conversations
in
different
committee
rooms
and
different
bills
about
rpcs
helping
with
this
and
helping
with
that.
You
know
natural
resources,
energy,
Equity,
just
more
thing
housing,
and
so
we
do
have
a
request
into
the
House
Appropriations
Committee
to
further
increase
our.
B
B
That
Senator
Ron
Hinsdale
worked
on
and
that
guy
voted
out
of
Senate,
Economic,
Development
and
housing.
You
know
two
weeks
ago,
maybe
now
it's
just
got
voted
out
of
Senate
natural
resources.
Today
there
are
some
changes
that
that
committee
made
and
I'm
still
hopeful
that
something
happens
to
address
the
housing
crisis,
not
sure
if.
I
B
Of
money
attached
to
it,
a
lot
of
policy
changes
around
permitting
more
focused
on
the
municipal
side
of
Permitting
in
this
bill,
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
in
the
legislature
about
waiting
for
some
ACT
250
studies
to
get
done
that
are
supposed
to
get
done.
This
December
before
they
tackle
more
substantive
act,
250
changes
in
the
24
session.
So
anyway,
that's
a
quick
update.
I,
don't
know
if
it
raised
any
questions
or
people
have
comments
on
other
things
that
maybe
I
should
be
paying
closer
attention
to
that
I'm,
not.
B
A
Being
nice
tonight,
thank
you,
yeah
no
questions.
Well,
if
there
are
and
you've
gone
through
the
whole
list
of
executive
directors
updates,
so
we're
going
to
number
12,
which
is
the
standard.
The
the
committee
and
liaison
activities
and
reports
are
either
by
link
or
in
your
packet.
However,
you
choose
to
do
so,
which
brings
us
to
the
end
unless
there's
something
somebody
wants
to
talk
about
I.