►
From YouTube: Essex Selectboard - 1/30/2023
Description
https://linktr.ee/townmeetingtv
Call To Order 00:00:00
Public To Be Heard 00:01:46
Public Hearing - Town Charter Amendments 00:03:06
Public Hearing - FY24 Budget 00:18:27
Public Hearing - Capital Budget/5 Year Plan 00:20:10
Adopt Amendments to Town Charter 00:22:39
Approve FY 24 Budget 01:08:30
Approve FY24 Capital Budget/5 Year Plan 01:13:08
Town Meeting Warning 01:28:20
Consent Items 02:01:23
Reading File 02:01:49
Total Run Time: 02:04:23
Town Meeting TV is a free speech forum and the ideas expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the Town Meeting TV trustees and staff. If you have a different perspective to share, we invite you to join the conversation! Create your own program or cover a community meeting or event. Contact maketv@cctv.org or call 862-3966.
Thank you for tuning into Town Meeting TV! Please subscribe to our YouTube channel and visit our website for more videos and information about how we open the doors to local government using community media. www.Ch17.TV
This video belongs to http://www.cctv.org and published with permission under Creative Commons License CCTV Center for Media & Democracy Programming is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
E
F
Last
week,
Andy
Watts
suggested
that
we
include
it
on
the
agenda
and
it's
basically
legislation
around
covid
and
Tom
meeting
and
open
meeting
law.
So
it's
an
opportunity
to
talk
about
if
you
want
to
do
town
meeting
in
person
or
do
it
remotely
and
electronically
by
Australian
ballot
this
year.
This
is
kind
of
the
last
chance
you'll
have
to
have
that
discussion
unless
you
want
to
have
a
special
meeting
later
on
this
week.
So
I
know
it's
late
notice
and
it's
an
action
item.
G
D
D
B
Hi,
thank
you
just
something
quick,
please
for
those
of
us
that
haven't
gotten
our
hearing
aids,
yet
try
to
speak
up
and
Ethan
I
think
you
have
a
lot
of
really
good
things
to
say,
but
it's
very
hard
to
understand
you,
because
you
kind
of
Mumble,
I,
think
and
I
mean
I,
don't
mean
that
in
a
bad
way,
but
if
you
guys
can
try
to
be
a
little
more,
you
know
clear
that
would
be
so
helpful
thanks.
So
much.
D
Seeing
none
we
will
move
on
to
our
public
hearings.
First
up
is
the
second
public
hearing
on
proposed
amendments
to
the
town
of
Essex.
Charter
I'll
go
ahead
and
open
the
public
hearing
Greg.
Do
you
want
to
give
some
background
on
how
we
how
we
came
to
this
point
for
those
who
may
be
joining
us
sure,
first
time.
F
F
They
did
that
they
spent
they
met
weekly,
I,
think
from
September
October
through
November,
and
maybe
the
number
of
recommendations
of
how
to
amend
the
town
Charter.
It
was
quite
a
bit
and
more
than
we
could
all
handle
at
once.
So
the
select
board
took
a
look
at
the
recommendations
and
they
settled
on
going
after
pursuing
five
of
those
recommendations.
F
Once
the
select
board
started,
taking
a
look
at
it
and
staff
weighed
in
some
more.
The
select
board
has
now
kind
of
honed
in
on
those
five
and
has
presented
some
changes
to
the
public
that
would
be
put
forth
to
voters
in
March,
assuming
that
you
go
through
the
public
hearing
tonight
and
decide
to
put
it
on
the
town
meeting
morning.
Those
five
things
were
a
reorganization
of
the
charter.
So
no
changes
to
that
piece.
Just
a
different
structure
of
How
It's
laid
out
as
recommended
by
the
Review
Committee.
F
There
would
be
an
ability
to
adopt
and
enforce
ordinances
for
the
purposes
of
regulating
licensing
and
fixing
reasonable
and
necessary
license
fees.
There
would
be
a
section
to
consider
adopting
an
ordinance
preventing
or
just
cause
eviction,
another
provision
for
recall
of
Select
board
members
and,
lastly,
the
creation
of
a
development
review
board
with
the
concurrent
elimination
of
a
zoning
Board
of
adjustment.
F
The
proposed
changes
are
in
the
packet
happy
to
discuss
any
of
them.
I
do
want
to
draw
your
attention
to
a
couple
things.
One
is
a
memo
from
Catherine
Sonic
when
you
were
talking
about
who's,
our
community
development
director,
when
you
were
talking
about
the
timetable
for
shifting
from
a
drb
to
a
zoning
board,
there's
some
questions
about
what
staff
workload
workload
looks
like
and
what
the
time
you
might
might
include
so
Catherine
put
some
thoughts
together
there
and,
secondly,
chairman
Andy
Watts
could
not
be
here
tonight.
D
I
I
I
have
noted
a
significant
increase
of
truck
traffic
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
know
is
that
The
Allenbrook
development,
which
is
largely
in
Saxon
Hill,
impacts
me
directly
and
certainly
I'm.
I
live
in
a
close
to
the
Price
Chopper
and
we're
in
a
high
density
residential
district.
So
not
only
does
it
impact
me,
but
it
impacts
a
lot
of
us
who
live
on
this
road.
It
used
to
be
a
small
road
that
you
didn't
see
any
cars
on.
I
I
It
looked
like
it
was
from
2016.,
so
you
know
given
that
seven
years
ago,
and
a
lot
of
things
have
changed
in
terms
of
climate
and
our
understanding
and
what
we
need
to
do.
I
think
the
drb
is
needed
sooner
rather
than
later,
so
that
we
can
actually
focus
a
lot
more
on
planning
and
the
impacts
on
our
community
instead
of
just
moving
forward
with
some
of
the
plans
that
came
beforehand.
So
I'd
really
appreciate
it.
I
If
there
was
a
robust
discussion
about
it
and
that
we
stick
to
that
one
year,
commitment
we've
been
talking
about
it
for
years.
It's
not
like
we
didn't
know.
We
want
to
move
toward
it.
I
saw
that
the
city
also
switched
to
drb
and
it
looked
like
their
transition.
Wasn't
that
difficult
and
that
someone
certainly
that
our
staff
could
ask
and
for
recommendations
and
how
they
did
it,
what
the
issues
were
and
how
to
make
it
a
smooth
transition.
Thanks.
D
J
J
I
am
interested
in
the
drb
I
was
a
select
board
member
from
2009
to
2012.,
so
I'm
a
little
disappointed
in
Andy's
comments
and
his
letter
that
this
sort
of
dropped
from
the
heavens
as
a
result
of
the
charter
committee
coming
up
with
the
idea.
Well,
I
talked
about
it
when
I
was
on
the
select
board
in
that
period,
other
people
have
done
it.
J
There's
always
been
tremendous
resistance,
particularly
from
the
developer
Community,
who,
like
things
the
way
it
is
right
now
so
I
would
hasten
the
creation
of
the
drb
as
as
much
as
possible.
I
don't
know
if
I'll
hang
around
for
your
discussion
later,
I
did
I.
Remember
Ethan
talking
about
having
a
a
date
no
later
than
a
date.
Then
I
think
this
January
1st
2025,
which
wouldn't
be
quite
two
years,
but
it
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
time,
I.
J
Think
if
you
we
passed
this
provision,
this
March
it'll
be
a
pretty
good
indication
to
the
legislature
that
there's
a
lot
of
support
and
should
be
an
indication
to
the
town's
staff
that
there's
a
lot
of
support
in
the
community
and
we
can
move
on
with
it
and
I
know.
It'll
take
some
adjustments
when
I
was
on
the
select
board.
I
always
heard
how
hard
it
was
to
get
things
done,
because
the
staff
was
asked
to
do
too
much.
So
it's
a
refrain.
J
D
K
Thank
you.
Sorry.
It
took
me
so
long
to
get
up
here.
I'm,
Margaret,
Smith,
I,
live
on
Alder,
Lane
and
I
was
also
on
the
charter
committee
and
I
looked
today
briefly
at
the
Essex
City
Charter
and
they
got
their
Charter
passed
and
it
included
a
Planning
Commission
and
a
development
review
board.
They
did
it
in
less
than
a
year,
so
I
don't
understand
why
we
need
to
take
two
years
or
three
years
or
even
a
year
and
a
half.
So
it's
it's
in
their
current
Charter
and
it
passed
the
legislature.
K
So
it's
page
17
of
the
Essex
City
Charter
that
has
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
development
review
board.
So
sooner
rather
than
later-
and
somebody
else
mentioned
that
if
the
our
our
zoning
Planning
Commission
split,
they
would
have
half
as
much
work
to
do
so
they
can
get
through
their
agendas
much
faster.
Thank
you.
D
L
Hi
Brad
Kennison,
Bixby
Hill
Road
I've
addressed
the
select
board
a
number
of
times
and
written
the
psych
board
a
number
of
times
on
changes
to
the
recall
language,
but
I
was
told
on
when
I
was
presenting
on
the
3rd
of
January
to
the
select
board.
I
was
told
by
Andy
Watts
that
the
slack
board
was
not
going
to
change,
even
though
it
was
a
public
hearing.
A
public
meeting
and
asked
for
input
from
the
public
Andy
said
that
they
weren't
going
to
change.
The
SEC
board
was
not
going
to
change
the
language.
D
D
This
is
the
public
hearing.
The
business
item
is
essentially
bringing
the
conversation
back
to
the
board
for
discussion.
We
could
take
public
okay
as
we
go
on
changes.
However,
it
would
have
to
be
something
different
than
we
would
hear
in
the
public
hearing
which
we'll
see
when
we
get
there.
I
would
take
this
opportunity
to
say
what
you
have
to
say
and
give
your
feedback.
L
Well,
I
I,
I've,
written
and
I've
spoken
numerous
times
and
made
suggestions
to
the
language
and
all
I've
heard
from
Andy
is
we're
not
going
to
change
the
language
and
that
was
in
the
January
third
meeting,
so
I'm
just
asking.
If
that's
I
is,
if
that's
the
case
and
if
it,
if
it
is
I,
would
recommend
not
putting
that
on
the
ballot,
because
it
is
so
strongly
in
favor
of
the
select
board
and
there's
virtually
no
chance.
It
would
be
successful.
A
petition
would
be
successful
by
voters,
but
so
anyway,
that's
my
comment.
D
G
E
F
Believe
me,
I
I,
hear
the
desire
to
move
to
a
drb,
Catherine
and
I
were
actually
two
of
the
people
who
suggested
we
take
a
look
at
that
in
the
charter.
It
will
take
time
and
I
know
that
Essex
Junction
has
done
it
more
quickly.
They
have
a
different
Staffing
structure
than
us.
They
have
different
setup
than
we
do.
It
might
very
well.
F
Happen
in
a
year
and
that's
in
a
year
when
Catherine
and
her
team,
the
Planning
Commission,
are
rewriting
the
town
plan.
That's
a
major
requirement
that
we
have
to
do
every
eight
years,
they're
in
the
thick
of
that
right
now,
she's
also
and
Catherine,
and
the
Comm
Dev
team
are
looking
at
going
after
State
designations
and
preparing
that
piece.
That's
a
large
lift
to
do
as
well
in
the
next
year
to
be
ready
for
that.
F
It
gives
the
town
opportunity
to
pursue
more
grant
funding
and
help
with
development
in
the
town,
center
and
other
areas
where
we
want
to
see
development.
They
have
a
normal
caseload
of
development
review
to
work
through
questions
about
which
staff
person
would
be
providing
support
to
which
board
which
committee
Catherine's
memo
lays
it
out
in
a
lot
more
detail,
a
lot
of
the
other
stuff
that
that
she
has
going
on
I'm
sure
she
can
speak
to
it.
F
If
you
have
questions
so
just
my
plug
of
we're
not
saying
no
we're
just
asking
that
did
not
have
to
be
done
within
a
year,
because
that
gets
into
the
point
of
where
it
might
affect
other
work.
For
staff
for
the
Planning
Commission
or
the
Zoning
Board
of
adjustment
I'm
happy
to
speak
to
more
questions,
but
I
do
just
want
to
put
in
that
last
pitch.
Thank
you.
C
Just
to
be
clear
what
it
says
one
year
from
the
passage
approval
of
Montpellier,
we
don't
even
know
if
they're
even
going
to
look
at
it
this
year
correct,
so
you
could
actually
have
more
time
than
a
year
you
might.
My
other
thing
is
that
in
1994,
according
to
blct,
Vermont
legislature
recommended
drbs
for
all
towns.
Here
we
are
in
2023
in
Essex,
one
of
the
largest
towns
of
Vermont.
We
don't
have
one.
So
that's
why
we're
looking
at
this,
but
then.
D
D
Seeing
no
hands
I
am
going
to
close
the
public
hearing
on
proposed
amendments
to
the
town
of
Essex
Charter
and
now
open
the
public
hearing
on
the
fiscal
year
2024
Municipal
budget.
If
you
would
like
to
comment
on
the
budget
as
part
of
the
public
hearing,
please
raise
your
hand
if
you
are
in
the
room.
If
you
are
online
again,
that
option
can
be
found
under
reactions
in
the
zoom
meeting,
and
you
should
see
a
raise
hand.
Button.
G
D
D
F
I
just
want
to
draw
your
attention
to
something
in
this
one.
Again,
we've
been
talking
about
the
capital
budget
and
plan
for
capacity
meetings.
We
did
make
a
change
to
it
this
time
as
Dan's
gotten
Finance
director,
Dan
Roy
has
gotten
deeper
into
the
audit,
he's
basically
just
catching
up
the
balances,
so
the
the
main
difference
main
change
is
that
the
fiscal
year
22
ending
balance,
was
not
what
we
proposed
before
it's
of
about
300
000
come
on
up
long
story
short
as
Dan
comes
up.
F
N
Yeah,
that's
correct
good
evening,
so
our
fiscal
year-
23-
that's
you
that's
in
in
front
of
you-
is
like
a
rolling
fund
balance
from
fiscal
year.
22.
fiscal
year,
24
budget
hasn't
changed
from
what
you've
seen
before.
It's
really
just
a
matter
of
updating
the
fiscal
year,
22
number
to
match
the
audit
report
that's
been
completed,
so
that's
that's
caused
a
reduction
of
about
280,
000
and
Capital
project
assets.
N
It's
it's
catching
up
numbers!
You
know
these.
These
numbers
for
the
fiscal
year,
22
capital
budget
originally
created
in
the
spring
of
20..
So
every
cycle
we
need
to
update
the
actual
numbers
in
it
that
allows
everything
to
flow
through
to
update
the
current
numbers
and
where
we
project
the
land
in
23.
A
N
D
A
D
M
M
M
H
I
have
a
question
and
is
there
anything
that
staff
can
do
prior
to
that
legislature?
Approval
assuming
that
it
was
past
that
town
meeting
could
staff
get
say
a
good
portion
of
the
preparation
to
go
to
a
drv
done
before
the
legislature
gave
a
formal
approval
and
then
still
have
a
year
to
finish
it
up
so
to
speak.
F
Yeah
we
would
start
working
on
it.
I
think
we've
already
started
to
give
it
some
thought,
Catherine
and
I
and
and
what
it
might
look
like
and
how
it
might
happen
and
yeah
if
it
gets
passed
by
the
voters,
we
would
ramp
that
up.
It's
again,
it's
just
a
question
of
timing
and
what
other
work
takes
a
back
seat
or
doesn't
get
done
or
has
to
get
done
at
the
same
time
and
being
able
to
focus
attention
in
certain
areas,
so
we
would
start
working
on
it.
It's
just
it's
really.
H
For
the
time
being,
I
just
I
share
the
concern
that
A
legislature
passes
it
whenever
and
you
have
one
year
that
happens
in
two
months
after
town
meeting.
That's
a
short
timeline,
but
if
they
didn't
get
to
it
until
next
year,
as
you
say,
and
then
they
passed
it
and
you
had
a
year
if
you
had
actually
the
two
years
of
that
time
frame
to
do
it.
A
F
F
F
You
know
this
other
stuff,
I
think
it's
a
lot
of
other
towns
have
some
of
these
things
in
place
anyways.
So
it
may
not
be
big
challenges
or
big
concerns,
but
again
it's
tough
to
predict
what
the
legislature
will
do
and
what
time
frame
they'll
act,
questions
they
might
have,
but
I
don't
see
it
I,
don't
see
a
drb
being
a
controversial
thing
for
the
legislature
to
approve.
H
M
M
If
the
town
approves
it
and
let's
say
it
would
be
minus
two
months,
you
have
16
months
from
town
approval
to
prepare
yourself,
and
that
was
you
know
my
question.
What
is
the
workload
like?
Is
there
severe
changes
that
need
to
be
done
in
the
town
like?
Do
we
have
a
timeline
on
staff's
time
on
on
what
it's
actually
going
to
take
to
complete
the
tasks?
O
Thank
you
so
Greg
and
I
have
started
talking
somewhat
about
the
change
and
what
it
could
look
like
that
we
haven't
sat
down
to
Think
Through
how
many
hours
you
know
that
level
of
detail
that
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
concerns
me
most
until
we
have
this
figured
out.
Is
there
our
number
of
Staff
we
have?
We
might
need
another
staff
person.
If
we're
doing
a
lot
more
planning,
then
we
might
need
two
planners
development
review
takes
a
lot
of
time
as
well,
so
our
current
planner
does
that.
O
But
right
now
he's
he's
doing
a
lot
of
the
drb
or
the
development
review
process
and
looking
at
other
towns
that
are
that
are
really
similar
size
to
ours.
They
have
more
staff
than
we
do.
I
think
I
put
that
in
the
memo.
So
there's
just
things
like
that
that
I
feel
like
we
need
to
really
sit
down
figure
out
the
structure
or
process.
O
You
know
that's
aside
from
our
just
our
normal
workload,
which
is
pretty
heavy
right
now
and
I'm
relatively
new,
and
our
planner
is
pretty
much
brand
new,
so
he's
got
a
big
learning
curve.
So
we're
not
really
full
fully
up
and
running
right
now,
I'd
say
we
will
be
it
just
takes
a
little
time.
I
think
we're
just
going
through
a
transition
period
a
little
bit
as
we
get
our
feet
under
us.
So
I
would
just
appreciate
considering
a
little
flexibility
again
as
Greg
said
I'm
not
opposed
to
this
change.
O
It
was
a
recommendation
to
staff
to
consider
it
so
yeah
I'm,
I'm,
happy
with
that
Prospect
I.
Just
that
the
timing
is
is
all,
and
ideally
I
would
want
to
do
it
as
quickly
as
we
could
I
wouldn't
I'm,
not
saying
it
will
be
two
years
from
the
date
of
Passage,
but
just
give
us
that
flexibility
for
two
years.
C
A
D
O
F
And
thank
you
for
having
this
conversation
and
for
hearing
us
out
and
I
I
to
be
cleared
whatever
Direction
you
all
decide
and
give
us
we'll
go
and
we'll
we'll
get
it
done,
it's
a
question
of.
Can
we
do
it
all
all
at
once
and
if,
if
we
have
to
do
the
town
plan,
that's
the
statutory
requirement
it
has
to
get
done.
F
F
Some
of
the
other
planning
efforts,
Grant
efforts,
some
of
stuff
those
types
of
things.
What
might
get
pushed
aside
they
may
not,
but
they
might
be
if
we're
required
to
do
the
drb
transition
within
a
shorter
time
frame.
So
that's
kind
of
what
we're
trying
to
relay
and
just
hopefully
making
that
clear
that
we'll
go
the
direction
you
take.
It's
just
what
else
might
not
get
done
in
that
time
frame.
O
I
think
so
we
might
have
to
have
to
pay
for
it.
We
get
a
certain
amount
of
time
of
their
time
as
a
part
of
our
our
work
with
them
or
their
work
with
us,
but
yeah
I
I
haven't
asked
that
question
last
time.
I
asked
for
some
help
from
them.
They
said
they
were
really
busy,
but
but
if
we're
willing
to
pay
them
sweetness.
H
Can
you
guarantee
that
it
would
not
be
passed
in
this
session
yeah,
so
I
I'm
very
inclined
to
listen
to
staff.
Your
town
plan,
especially
with
your
transition,
is
extremely
important.
Your
gross
designation
centers
and
all
of
that
you
have
new
staff.
In
some
cases,
we've
done
just
fine
with
the
way
we've
been
for
quite
some
time.
I,
don't
think
it's
unreasonable
to
have
a
two-year
plan.
H
H
I
mean
there's:
no,
it
doesn't
mean
that
they
have
to
take
the
full
two
years
after
passive,
especially
if
it
doesn't
require
that
they
go
any
quicker
and
if
you
can
get
especially
if
you
can
work
towards
that
without
the
legislation's
approval
I
just
think
that
I
agree
with
what
Greg
says
that
you
put
a
timeline
on
it.
Then
you
gotta
Shuffle
everything
to
do
that.
C
P
C
M
Q
Q
Yeah
I'm
sorry,
oh
yeah,
Patty,
Davis,
nine
Hillside
Circle
in
Essex.
Thank
you
go
ahead.
Okay,
I
was
just
throwing
this
out
as
an
idea,
because
I've
been
looking
at
other
towns,
Colchester,
South,
Burlington
and
and
I'm
only
speaking
as
a
resident
on
Hillside
Circle,
nothing
else,
just
as
a
resident
who
lives
here,
because
I
don't
like
the
trucks
either
on
Route,
15
and
I,
don't
want
any
more
of
them,
but
but
my
my
suggestion
is
because
the
workload
is
so
much
for
the
existing
Planning,
Commission
and
drb.
Q
What?
If
I'm
throwing
this
out
there?
We
have
a
way
to
stop
to
stop
what
is
in
the
pipeline
Midstream
coming
through
the
approval
process
that
normally
a
drb
would
do
so
that
we
could
just
focus
on
everything
that
we
have
to
deal
with
the
town
plan
and
all
that,
because
that's
planning
and
that's
what
we
are
planning,
commission
and
and
I
know.
A
lot
of
us
individually
are
offering
to
be
on
committees
and
even
help
out
at
the
Town
Office.
D
Thank
you
for
the
comment.
Patty
I'll
take
a
moment
to
comment
that
I,
don't
think
statutorially
that
we
can
just
say:
hey
we're
halting
reviews
and
application
processes,
and
we
can't
change
the
Pipelines
as
far
as
which
board
reviews,
which
items
until
it's
in
our
Charter
and
the
legislature
essentially
gives
us
the
authority
to
have
a
drb
model.
Is
that
correct.
G
J
Yeah
just
quickly
on
the
motion
before
us,
I
wouldn't
put
18
months
in
there
from
passage
because
you
don't
necessarily
know
in
passage,
so
you
know
Bond
passage
or
no
later
than
at
the
date
you
suggested.
Ethan
works.
Fine
I
appreciate
Dawn's
interest
in
getting
this
done.
I've
been
waiting
a
long
time,
you
know,
and
the
people
of
Israel
were
exiled
in
the
desert.
J
They
had
a
saying
next
year,
Jerusalem
well
next
year,
drb
has
been
around
a
long
time
and
I've
also
worked
at
staff
levels,
I've
directed
staff.
Things
can
get
done
and
I
think
the
compromise
that
Ethan
has
suggested
is
eminently
doable
and
there
would
be
a
definite
message
coming
in
March.
If
the
town
voters
approve
this
and
don't
forget
too,
a
resident
of
the
town
of
Essex
sits
on
the
Senate
government,
Ops
committee,
Tanya
vachovski
does.
J
If
you
haven't
been
talking
to
her
you,
you
should
because
you
know
once
that
the
separation
Charter
passed
the
house.
It
went
through
the
Senate
pretty
darn
quickly,
and
so
you
know
the
you
have
to
get
that
I
guess
the
traction
has
to
start
first
in
house
govops,
and
you
can
do
that
so
I
I
support
what
Ethan's
trying
to
do.
I
I,
don't
think
that
18-month
thing
would
necessarily
fit
in
there,
but
the
no
later
than
date
certainly
would.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
your
consideration.
Thank.
D
D
R
You
Ken
cignarello,
Brigham,
Hill,
Road
I'll,
offer
you
a
suggestion
that
I
think
might
work
a
little
bit
smoother.
First,
it's
nice
to
sync
these
things
up
with
our
fiscal
year,
so
typically
these
things
would
pass
somewhere
between
January
and
may
or
so
so.
I
would
suggest
that
you
adjust
it
a
little
bit
so
that
the
wording
would
be
that
you
would
use
the
fiscal
year
following
the
implementation
as
your
transition
period
and
that
it
would
be
in
effect
the
beginning
of
that
next
fiscal
year.
R
So
if
it
was
to
pass,
does
the
legislature
in
let's
say
January,
you
would
function
right
through
the
end
of
that
fiscal
year.
The
next
fiscal
year
is
your
transition.
Year
got
a
whole
year
to
do
it
as
much
as
six
additional
months
and
then
the
following
fiscal
year
when
all
the
terms
expire
on
both
well
some
terms
expire
on
both
boards,
the
zoning
and
the
Planning
Commission
it'll
be
less
upheaval
a
little
bit
smoother
transition
I
think
it
would
be
approximately
18
months.
It
might
be
a
little
bit.
R
D
D
H
A
C
M
I
D
A
C
H
H
A
H
D
D
C
C
C
D
C
G
C
C
D
D
M
H
C
D
D
A
M
M
H
M
H
M
D
M
M
M
And
that's
why
it's
worded
in
there
that
says
the
same
amount
of
Voters
or
the
one-third,
and
if
we
think
that
one-thirds
too
high
that's
a
different
discussion.
I
mean
I'm.
Okay
with
that,
if
that
was
to
be
lowered
to
2000
or
to
I
mean
whatever
anybody
thought
it
should
be,
but
the
the
wording
that
I
really
is
strong
in
there
is
that
the
same
people
who
voted,
because
if
you
have
two
different
groups
of
people
vote
I
mean
that
was
that
was
one
of
Brad's
points
about
the
challenge.
M
Voters,
but
I
mean
anybody
can
vote
at
any
time.
You
could
have
1500
people
show
up
and
vote
and
then
you
could
have
4
000
people
come
out.
If
there's
a
serious,
you
know
issue
where
the
software
member
needs
to
be
recalled.
I
guarantee
the
number
of
people
who
vote
in
a
recall
is
going
to
be
higher
than
the
original
election,
especially
when
there's
you.
M
E
D
G
S
P
P
M
P
M
Stipulation
if
you
could
get
the
voters
and
the
support,
then
you
had
your
case.
There
was
no
case
to
prove
to
anybody
other
than
the
voters
and
I
think
that's
where
we
decided
when
we
I
think
I,
don't
know
if
I
don't
remember
if
it
was
unanimous
or
not,
but
no
way
to
the
15,
because
we
had
removed
the
other
language.
M
H
D
D
G
D
C
D
G
D
D
M
H
C
H
C
P
D
And
any
Nays
say
no
motion
carries
4-0.
That
brings
us
to
the
end
of
our
business
item
for
consider
adopting
amendments
to
the
town
of
Essex
Charter,
which
brings
us
to
consider
approval
of
fiscal
year
2024
Municipal
budget
Dan.
Would
you
like
to
join
us
or
you
can
stay
seated
and
if
there's
no
questions.
A
D
D
C
C
G
H
H
H
We're
not
doing
that
we're
using
our
savings
and
half
of
that
saving.
41
of
that
savings
that
you're
putting
towards
it
came
from
the
city
that
we
no
longer
have
access
to
so
I.
Just
philosophically
I
have
a
problem
with
not
fully
funding
the
budget
when
we
know
that
we
need
that
money
to
run
the
town,
that
you
can't
find
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
more
of
savings,
and
you
know
that
you're
going
to
have
to
find
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
more
of
Revenue,
probably
tax
revenue
from
the
folks
going
ahead.
H
H
So
the
tour
that
I
took
on
Friday
was
very
eye-opening.
I
would
encourage
every
town
resident
to
take
advantage
of
that
as
well.
There
are
a
number
of
capital
projects
in
a
town
that
have
obviously
been
put
off
and
the
town
is
just
spending
Capital
as
they
have
it,
they're,
not
planning
for
the
capital
that
they
need.
H
Currently,
that's
my
opinion,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear
and
so
I
may
be
the
only
one
that
ever
votes
for
a
budget,
because
it's
or
won't
vote
for
a
budget,
because
it's
too
low
I
think
next
year,
you're
going
to
be
in
10
to
15
range
again
because
of
the
cost
that
you're
looking
at
again
I
just
I
think
it's.
It
should
be
out
there
publicly.
That's
all!
Thank
you.
D
M
D
Motion
second
you're
ready
to
vote
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
aye.
All
those
opposed
yay
motion
carries
three
zero.
Thank
you
moving
along.
Our
next
business
item
is
a
consider
approval
of
fiscal
year,
2024
capital
budget
and
Five-Year
Plan
Greg,
just
to
clarify
this
is
not
something
that
will
the
capital
plan
will
not
be
on
the
budget,
but
the
select
board
does
need
to
adopt
it.
Correct.
F
Correct
so
you
adopt
the
capital
plan,
capital
budget
and
Five-Year
Plan.
That
goes
into
the
annual
report,
so
people
can
see
what
it
is
and
where
the
two
cents
on
the
Capital
Tax
are
going,
but
because
we
have
that
two
cents
on
the
Capital
Tax.
That
is
fixed.
That's
what
is
there?
It's
like
preview
for
an
item
later
on
on
the
agenda
is
there's
a
question
about
whether
or
not
to
increase
that
two
cents
and
increase
the
Capital
Tax,
but
for
what
you're
voting
on
and
what
you're
approving
right?
F
C
F
So
there's
a
couple
ways:
you
could
increase
the
operating
budget,
but
you
just
approved
that
you
increase
operating
transfers
into
Capital
we've
already
assigned
200
000
of
fiscal
year,
22
fund
balance
towards
undesignated
Capital,
all
right!
So
that's
how
you
did
it
and
that's
already
in
there.
That's!
Okay,
that's
been.
M
M
C
D
D
H
F
I'll
take
a
shot
at
it
and
I'll
look
to
Dan
and
Aaron
and
Catherine
if
they
want
to
add
anything
after
that.
But
you
know
that
Capital
look,
that
60
million
is
every
project
that
we've
identified
over
the
next
five
years
and
in
some
cases
Beyond,
so
we're
trying
to
fund
it
along
the
way.
As
we
go.
That's
some
of
the
you
know
the
Capital
Tax
generates
about
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
with
the
new
town
of
Essex
tax
base
operating
transfers.
F
But
there's
another
good
chunk
of
money
that
comes
in
from
the
operating
transport.
First
I
go
towards
Capital.
It
was
like
600.
yeah.
That
sounds
about
right
for
sure
and
that
just
kind
of
a
rolling
thing.
So
every
year
we'll
have
new
vehicles
that
that
come
off
the
capital
budget
because
we
pay
for
them.
We
have
Parks
equipment
that
we
buy
new
parks,
Park
equipment
park,
assets
that
comes
off
the
capital
budget.
So
it's
not
the
60
million
dollars.
Is
it's
a
combined
total
over
a
number
of
years?
N
F
F
And
that's
a
really
EP
said
Dimension,
just
to
reiterate
the
grants.
We
do
a
lot
Aaron
and
his
team
do
a
lot
Catherine
as
well
to
go
after
grant
opportunities
and
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
just
the
town
of
Essex
tax
dollars
paying
for
Capital.
We
try
to
find
other
opportunities
to
supplement
our
own
our
own
assets.
Yes,.
E
H
I
just
noticed
looking
through
the
capital
budget,
parking
parks
and
recs
is
funded.
Pretty
well
I
mean
they've
got
in
their
Capital
section.
They've
got
enough
money
to
cover
what
they
have
for
Capital
there.
When
you
look
at
like
your
buildings
and
especially
Public
Works
and
places
like
that,
they're
substantially
lower
than
their
assets
so
and
when
you
go
around
through
the
town,
you
can
see
that
some
of
these
capital
projects
have
been
put
off,
probably
because
of
funding.
H
F
F
Does
it
make
sense
to
stick
with
the
12-year
vehicle
replacement
schedule,
or
is
it
going
to
save
us
money
in
the
long
run,
to
go
to
a
10-year
or
an
eight-year
replacement
cycle
to
really
get
into
Aaron
Aaron's
done
some
work
with
our
stormwater
infrastructure
that
started
to
fail
in
in
some
cases.
Are
we
setting
aside
enough
for
that?
We
really
want
to
spend
the
next
year
figuring
out?
Is
that
60
million?
Is
that
accurate?
Is
it
too
much?
H
Fair
enough
I,
just
I
want
to
be
the
one
that
squawks
about
it,
because
a
lot
of
places
they
have
a
capital
plan
and
they
do
it
every
year
stuff,
but
they
just
don't
provide
the
funding
to
do
what
you
know
you
need
for
the
capital
and
I
would
just
like
to
see
Essex
fund
it.
The
way
it
needs
to
be
funded.
D
P
D
Aye,
all
those
opposed,
nay
motion
carries
4-0
and
in
looking
back
at
my
notes,
Here
I
had
written
down
three
zero
for
the
voting
on
the
budget.
I
do
just
want
to
point
out
that
it
was
three
one
and
that
did
pass
so
I
apologize
if
if
that
was
a
mistake
or
if
I
just
wrote
it
incorrectly,
which
is
a
possibility.
D
F
F
F
F
So
we've
already
made
steps
to
do
that
and
and
to
reserve
some
space
up
at
the
Essex
Cinemas,
but
did
want
to
bring
this
up.
Andy
Watts
caught
it
and
asked
it
to
be
added
to
the
agenda.
So
do
you
think
it's
worth
a
discussion
and
just
acknowledging
that
is
out
there
and
that
the
opportunity
exists?
If
you
want
to
be
cautious,
I
don't
want
to
make
any
judgments
or
preconceived
notions
as
to
how
people
feel
about
covert
these
days
so
chance
to
talk
about.
F
If
you
want
to
do
anything
about
h42
or
proceed
as
you've
discussed
about
moving
back
to
the
in-person
town
meeting,
the
only
other
thing
I'll
put
in
there
is
we've
talked
about,
and
this
will
be
on
your
next
item.
You,
you
would
want
to
include
an
item
on
town
meeting
to
move
to
move
all
future
business
to
Australian
ballot.
If
you
do
that,
that
has
to
be
a
four
vote,
is
still
my
understanding.
F
So
if
you
do
the
all
Australian
ballot
voting
in
this
case
allowed
under
age
42
that
question
would
not
be
allowed.
You'd
have
to
wait
until
another
year
or
two
to
be
until
you
go
back
to
in-person
top
meeting,
but
with
that
caveat,
I'll
turn
it
over
and
try
to
answer
any
questions
or
let
you
discuss.
S
G
F
C
What's
my
other
concern?
Is
that
and
Tammy's
already
started
working
on,
the
different
departments
are
going
to
set
up
tables
sign
up.
You
know.
People
are
interested
in
stuff
like
that
or
what's
happening
in
Essex
conservation
and
trails
will
have
a
table
and
get
that
information
out
for
people,
and
that's
already
in
the
works
too
so
I'd
rather.
M
F
It's
not
100
in
it's
95
I'll,
explain
why
in
in
the
past,
that
has
been
the
understanding
that
you
have
to
have
a
four
vote
to
to
move
to
Australian
ballot
and
all
future
instances
and
I
think
it
was
last
year
the
year
before,
when
the
legislature
allowed
a
similar
type
of
event
to
happen.
They
specified
that
you
cannot
ask
to
move
all
future
business
to
Australian
ballot
by
Australian
ballot
under
these
coveted
rules.
F
So
that's
where
I'm
assuming
it
still
applies,
unless
there's
an
exception
and
I
was
looking
through
some
of
the
information
from
the
Vermont
League
of
cities
and
towns.
I
didn't
find
anything
about
that,
but
fairly
confident
that
it
will
be
what
it's
been
in
the
past,
which
is
that
you
have
to
have
that
for
both.
M
P
M
M
F
The
Monday
night,
March
6th
there
will
be
as
proposed
on
the
the
warning
that
you'll
take
up
next.
The
question
I'm
sure
the
reports,
the
officers
be
accepted,
that
would
be
a
floor
vote
and
the
voting
on
all
future
business
by
Australian
bout
would
also
be
a
four
vote.
Then
it
would
turn
into
the
informational
hearing
to
talk
about
the
other
ballot
items.
The
the
budget,
the
Capital
Tax,
the
charter
amendments
we
typically
announce
who's
up.
F
Not
that
I
have
heard
well
I'm,
not
a
public
health
expert
by
any
means
anecdotally.
It
seems
like
we're
returning
to
kind
of
pre-covered
times.
You
certainly
see
more
masks
in
the
grocery
store,
but
than
you
did
before.
Coven,
but
I
completely
anecdotal
I'm
not
going
to
try
to
speculate
or
a
pine
on
much
the
right,
Health
measure.
D
On
that
note,
since
we
did
not
have
a
public
hearing
on
this
one,
we
will
go
over
to
public
comment.
If
there's
any
public
comment
in
the
room
on
each
42
and
in
person
versus
virtual
information
session,
whether
to
include
a
floor
vote,
if
it
is
in
person
whether
to
include
a
floor
vote
for
moving
all
business
to
Australian
ballot
at
that
meeting,
anyone
in
the
room
anyone
online
have
public
comment
on
this.
Can
I
see
your
hand
up.
I
Lorenzuelan
Center
Road
Essex,
just
one
concern
when
we
did
some
of
our
Equity
work
on
the
best
committee.
One
of
the
things
that
we
found
was
online
access
for
people
who
are
extremely
busy
have
little
kids
have
a
sick
or
a
loved
one
at
home
that
they
have
to
take
care
of
it,
certainly
for
those
who
are
marginalized.
In
that
way,
it
makes
things.
A
I
G
I
You
hear
me:
okay,
okay,
what
I
worked
on
Essex
best,
which
was
started
as
a
task
force
for
policing,
and
we
looked
at
equity
and
one
of
our
findings
through
that
work
was
that
online
offered
access
for
people
who
are
marginalized
people.
Parents
were
at
home,
can't
get
out.
People
have
loved
ones
who
are
sick,
can't
get
out.
I
Elderly
people
who
can't
get
out
it
just
was
a
way
to
make
voting
more
accessible
and
more
Equitable,
so
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there,
and
also
in
terms
of
covid,
very
unpredictable.
It's
just
hard
to
know,
and
there
are
people
who
are
immuno
compromised,
who
can't
get
the
shot,
who
may
not
be
able
to
wear
the
mask
for
whatever
reason
it's
just
in
terms
of
trying
to
be
a
more
Equitable
and
accessible
town
for
democracy.
I
would
just
like
that
to
be
considered
thanks.
F
Channel
17
in
the
past
has
live
streamed,
I.
Believe
that's
going
to
be
the
case
again
this
year.
We're
planning
to
meet
with
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
Scott
or
a
different
representative
from
come
eating
TV
but
Tammy's
going
to
set
up
a
meeting
to
go
over
to
the
T-Rex
theater
and
make
sure
that
they
have
what
they
need
they
can
set
up.
Do
the
audio
video
audio
visual?
F
A
D
If
it
does
move
toward
an
online
informational
meeting,
the
balloting
will
still
take
place
the
next
day.
The
only
voting
that
would
not
happen
in
that
scenario
would
be,
though,
accepting
the
reports
of
the
officers
moving
toward
Australian
ballot
for
all
going
forward
and
well
I
guess
Public
public
to
be
heard
would
still
happen.
M
And
if
we
bite
the
bullet
and
do
it
this
year,
then
all
your
and
assuming
it
passes
all
years
moving
forward,
it
would
become
an
informational
meeting,
Australia
and
all
business
would
be
Australian
ballot.
So
that
would
be,
in
my
opinion,
the
more
like
like
we're
in
was
speaking
about
Equitable
path
forward
for
the
town,
because
it's
more
inclusive,
we
have
I,
agree
absentee
ballots
and
access
to
to
our
voting
system.
C
D
E
A
C
I
make
the
motion
that
we
approve
the
warning
for
the
annual
town
meeting
dated
March
6th
and
7th
through
2023,
to
fill
in
the
amount
under
Article
5
to
read:
fifteen
thousand
four
hundred
fifteen
million
four
hundred
and
one
thousand
one
152
dollars
oops
we
need
to
should
we
need
to
do
article
six
before
I?
Do
this,
though
I
believe
we
should.
C
D
D
H
Oh
you
know:
I
would
like
more.
Andy
does
have
a
memo
in
here
that
he
wanted
three
cents,
but
I
would
speak
in
favor
of
the
3.5
cents.
I,
don't
think
we
should
lose
any
more
ground.
This
is
literally
the
biggest
bang
for
your
buck.
It's
been
decades,
I've
told
so
many
people
all
over
the
place.
That
Essex
does
this
and
everybody
should
do
it
under
Capital.
Right
on
your
thing,
give
your
folks
a
chance
to
vote
on
it.
Explain
it
to
them.
H
I
think
if
you
put
out
a
lot
of
information
as
far
as
what
they
actually
get
for
that
two
or
four
cents
on
their
tax
bill,
it's
staggering
Town
staff
takes
that
and
applies
it
towards
grants,
sometimes
80
to
90
percent
Grant
funded.
So
it's
it's.
It's
literally
the
biggest
bang
for
your
buck,
so
I
I
would
peek
in
favor
of
staying
with
three
and
a
half
cents.
That
at
least
keeps
the
status
quo
a
little
bit.
D
C
M
F
M
H
F
H
H
So
in
my,
in
my
opinion,
it
doesn't
look
like
it's
tied
that
closely
to
where
it
goes,
which
again
for
me,
is
an
issue
of
transparency
for
the
voter,
in
that,
if
you,
if
you
figure
that
you're
putting
530
000
in
the
capital
of
a
year
and
that's
doing
all
of
your
Capital
stuff,
but
really
you're
pulling
extra
money
out
of
the
operating
budget,
so
you
have
a
million
this
year
and
then
next
year
we
didn't
need
the
530,
because
we
didn't
have
it.
We
only
spent
200.
H
F
So
yeah
so
the
the
two
cents
it
creates.
That
Baseline
creates
that
there's
always
some
money
coming
in
for
Capital,
as
I
mentioned.
We
also
have
money
that
comes
in
as
transfers
from
the
operating
budget
from
the
general
fund.
It
gets
money
that
gets
transferred
into
Capital
I,
don't
necessarily
think
there's
a
right
way
or
wrong
way
of
doing
it
or
a
more
or
less
transparent
way
of
doing
it.
F
I
think
you,
you
could
adjust
it
each
year
and
say:
okay.
The
two
cent
should
go
up
or
down
based
on
the
need,
but
it
can
pretty
confidently
say
that
the
need
is
there
for
that
two
cents
and
then
some
yeah,
and
so
then
it
becomes
you
want
to
transfer
some
from
operating.
Should
it
just
be
all
capital,
as
as
inflation
happens,
as
prices
come
up
is,
is
the
operating
transfer
going
to
be
enough?
Is
that
not
going
to
be
enough?
F
So
if
you're,
if
you're
fixed
at
two
cents
for
20
years,
all
the
things
you're
buying
and
paying
for
those
two
cents
are
not
going
to
be
the
same
price,
they
were
20
years
ago
right.
So
maybe
we're
saying
the
same
thing:
yes,
we
are
yes,
we
are,
but
so
I
think
and
I
think
that's
part
of
what
we
want
to
do
over
the
next
year.
Really
figure
out.
F
F
So
that's
why
we're
looking
at
replenishing
what's
been
lost
and
then
adding
that
extra
0.1
Cent
to
kind
of
take
a
step
in
the
direction
of
what
we
think
is
coming
and
what
we
think
is
going
to
be
the
need,
but
then
yeah,
regardless
we'll
be
here
again
next
year,
saying
whether
it's
three
and
a
half
cents
or
hey,
we
overshot
it's
really
only
three
cents,
I
I,
wouldn't
Bank
on
that
I
wouldn't
expect
that,
but
I
think
it's
next
year
will
be
more
the
what's.
What
are
those
long-term
costs
that
are
coming?
F
H
And
that's
why
I'm
comfortable
with
staff's
recommendation
of
three
and
a
half
is
because
that's
based
on
what
you've
been
using
and
what
you
need
at
least
so,
and
that
feels
like
a
better
decision
to
me
versus
saying.
Well
I,
maybe
the
voters
won't
approve
it
or
maybe
they
won't.
If
they
don't,
then
you
know
that
they
won't.
But
this
way
it's
it's
based
on
a
real
world
need
real
number.
H
H
F
E
E
C
F
For
we're
in
this
year's
budget
so
based
on
the
fiscal
23
budget,
yeah
we're
not
going
to
say
that
we're
going
to
have
the
same
amount
of
money,
but
the
way
we've
been
budgeting.
We've
we've.
You
know
in
the
fiscal
24
budget,
where
we've
cut
that
police
to
90
funding,
where
we've
stripped
out
the
overtime
where
we
stripped
out
a
lot
of
that
buffer
that
we
used
to
have
there's
always
going
to
be
Staffing
turnover.
There's
always
going
to
be
some
openings
there
we
might
get.
F
Keep
your
fingers
crossed
yeah
we'll
come
in
under
budget,
but
we
don't
know
what
and
then,
when
we
come
in
under
budget,
we
take
a
look
at
forget
who
said
it
earlier,
but
that
600
000
is
a
fund
balance.
That's
offsetting
this
year's
tax
rate.
If
we
just
take
that
out,
that's
a
six
percent
budget
increase
next
year,
no
matter
what
we
want
to
use,
fund
balance
and
savings
to
kind
of
feather
that
down,
we
use
550
or
450
or
400
fund
balance
next
year
to
sort
of
ramp
down
that
tax
rate
increase.
F
And
if
we
have
enough
do
we
apply
some
towards
Capital
to
help
us
through
for
another
year
and
keep
keep
replenishing
or
capital
and
designated
based
on.
We
don't
know
what
the
next
storm
water
break
is
going
to
happen.
We
don't
know
when
the
truck
is
going
to
stop
working
or
the
salt
shed
is
going
to
collapse.
So
will
there
be
fund
balance
next
year
Maybe,
but
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know
how
much
and
the
year
after
that,
the
farther
you
get
out
the
harder
it
becomes
to
predict.
F
M
Is
everything
out
in
in
to
to
that
point?
If
you
ask
for
3.4
cents
and
you
don't
get
it
you're
now
short
250
000.,
so
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out.
There
I've
always
been
the
the
mouse
in
the
room
to
say
that
those
are
taxpayer
dollars
and
they
committed
that
money
to
the
budget
that
was
presented
to
them
and
it's
their
money
to
be
spent
in
that
budget.
M
M
C
M
all
right.
We
have
a
budget
coming
back
possible
Surplus.
We
have
fund
balance
right
now.
Currently,
if
we
can
get
three
cents
we're
looking
at
sixty
thousand
dollars
for
future
year,
25
budget,
which
you're
only
talking
gambling
for
sixty
thousand
dollars
and
better
chance
of
approval.
And
then
after
that,
Year's
budget
is
passed,
you
would
have
the
decision
to
make
for
planning
for
future
year
26
and
you
would
have
the
reappraisal
numbers
during
that
process.
It.
A
M
F
D
M
H
And
it's
based
on
real
world
numbers,
it's
based
on
the
need
that
has
been
there
and
is
there
and
it's
going
to
continue
to
be
there
so
I
think
it's
a
stronger
position
to
be
able
to
say
why
are
you
asking
for
1.4
cents,
because
the
budget
and
the
capital
plan
outlines?
This
is
what
you
need
minimum
versus.
M
M
D
Sure
person
sure
person,
yeah
foreign
as
I
just
I'm,
in
line
with
Andy's
thinking.
22
is
a
lot
we
moved
over.
The
equivalent
of
let's
say:
call
it
1.4
fence
well,
through
fund
balance,
give
or
take
I
would
prefer
to
see
an
increase,
but
I
think
3.4
is
too
high
at
this
time,
given
what
we
are
asking
of
Voters
to
go.
C
A
C
G
D
Q
Yeah
I
just
tuned
back
in
my
ears,
perked
up
listening
to
Kendall
I
can
attest
just
talking
to
a
lot
of
neighbors,
not
just
here,
but
on
the
other
side
of
town,
where
I
do
a
lot
of
my
Gardens
and
for
years
they
wanted
the
capital
tax
rate
to
be
increased
because
they
want
services
and
now
that
we're
separate
from
Essex
Junction,
we
want
Services.
Now
we
want
our
sidewalks
fixed,
we
want.
You
know
it's
been
35
years
since
and
I
think.
Q
C
Am
I
back
to
making
the
motion
to
approve
this
whole
warning
and
putting
in
the
amount?
That's
okay,
that's
what
you
want
to
do.
Yep
I
make
the
motion
that
we
approve
the
annual
town
of
Essex
Daniel.
Oh
my
gosh
Dawn
I'm.
Sorry,
we
approve
town
of
Essex
annual
warning,
dated
March
6th
and
7th
2023
to
include
the
texts.
D
D
D
D
D
F
H
F
Haven't
offered
a
tour
like
that,
if
somebody
was
interested
in
seeing
a
certain
thing
for
most
of
the
most
instances,
we
would
probably
accommodate
it.
We
do
have
some
areas
that
are
secure,
not
open
to
the
public
but
yeah.
If
there's
certain
areas
that
people
are
interested
to
see,
we
can
usually
try
to
find
a
time
to
show
it
to
them.
It's
tough
to
do
a
full
day.
Tour
like
that
yeah.