►
From YouTube: Williston Selectboard - 1/17/2023
Description
https://www.town.williston.vt.us/vertical/sites/%7BF506B13C-605B-4878-8062-87E5927E49F0%7D/uploads/Agenda_-_January_17_2023.pdf
00:00:00 Call To Order/Water System Connection Fees
00:00:03 Executive Session
00:01:22 Minutes - January 3
00:05:00 Public Comment
00:09:46 Old Brick Church Trustees Applicant
00:15:31 Water System Connection Fees
00:24:07 Annual Certification for VTrans
00:25:35 UPWP Annual Work Plan Projects
00:39:39 Cannabis Opt-In Request
01:01:36 ARPA Funding Allocations
01:07:27 General Fund Budget FY24
01:17:55 Capital Budget & Program FY24-FY29
01:21:25 Solar Array Purchase
01:23:56 Ambulance Bond
01:26:01 Town Meeting 2023 Warning
01:28:26 ARPA Community Outreach
01:36:31 Manager's Report
01:39:10 Other Business
Town Meeting TV is a free speech forum and the ideas expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the Town Meeting TV trustees and staff. If you have a different perspective to share, we invite you to join the conversation! Create your own program or cover a community meeting or event. Contact maketv@cctv.org or call 862-3966.
Thank you for tuning into Town Meeting TV! Please subscribe to our YouTube channel and visit our website for more videos and information about how we open the doors to local government using community media. www.Ch17.TV
This video belongs to http://www.cctv.org and published with permission under Creative Commons License CCTV Center for Media & Democracy Programming is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A
B
C
A
There
a
second
second,
is
there
any
discussions,
hearing
that
all
I
was
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
say:
I
I
I
have
four
eyes
and
we
will
head
downstairs
to
do
our
business
school
for
the
executive
session
just
out
of
executive
session
I.
Think
we'll
continue
on
the
agenda
as
described
and
then
we'll
I
get
into
this
a
discussion
of
what
we
discussed
that
the
executive
session.
A
D
D
If
we
could
go
up
to
the
top
of
the
page,
it's
under
a
number
of
item
number
five
Winooski
Valley,
Park
District,
and
it's
in
the
middle
of
the
paragraph.
The
sentence
read:
the
requested
allocation
from
Williston
is
6.3
percent
greater
than
last
year's
amount
based
on
the
fair
share
analysis.
Comma,
not
the
amount
of
Park
acreage
in
a
member
town.
D
First
of
all,
I
wonder
if
that
second
part
of
the
sentence,
not
the
amount
of
Park
acreage
in
a
member
town
is
needed,
and
part
of
that
is
because
this
could
be
interpreted
that
the
6.3
percent
increase
is
due
to
a
different
way
of
calculating
our
fee
and
I.
Don't
want
that
to
be
the
impression
at
all,
they've
been
very
consistent
in
this
fair
share
analysis.
D
A
F
Quite
often,
I
have
a
membership
at
the
The
Outdoor
Center
for
skiing,
so
I
use
the
Catamount
Community
forest
and
multiple
activities,
and
so
in
since
2019
the
town
has
become
a
steward
of
this
parcel
of
land
and
I.
Believe
it's
the
largest
piece
of
land,
that's
the
town
owns
and
it
serves
many
functions
from
Wildlife
Corridor,
the
wildlife
habitat
recreational
area,
educational
facility,
a
grassland
bird
and
bluebird
programs
are
our
site,
is
over
there,
Forest
management
area
for
Timber
harvesting
and
for
Force
birds
and
invasive
management,
and
the
list
goes
on.
F
In
order
to
do
this,
the
catamac
community
Forest
committee
needs
proper
funding
to
to
manage
the
invasives
and
perform
the
forest
management
and
provide
educational
opportunities
and
to
take
on
new
projects
when
they
come
up.
The
committee
has
asked
for
an
increase
of
two
thousand
dollars
to
achieve
these
goals
in
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
2000
2024.
F
budget
and
I
hope
there
is
a
way
somehow
to
increase
the
operating
budget
in
the
future,
so
that
the
committee
can
continue
to
be
good.
Stewards
of
this
land
which
they
have
committed
to
do
to
doing
and
I
just
feel
that
it's
such
a
great
asset
to
the
to
the
town
and
the
surrounding
communities
that
we
should
try
to.
You
know
find
that
extra
little
bit
of
money
on
in
the
the
big
scheme
of
things.
It
is
pretty
small,
but
big
things
can
happen
with
it
at
the
for
Town
Forest.
D
A
D
Terry,
hey
Jeff
Harris
here,
so
your
understanding
is
the
kind
of
Mount
Community
Management
Force,
which,
by
the
way,
I
am
the
select
board
representative
on
requested
five
thousand
as
our
operating
budget,
not
the
3
000
that
made
it
into
the
budget.
The
only
reason
I
asked
that
is
I'm
on
page
112
and
it
it
notes
that
the
fiscal
year
2024
requested
amount
was
three
thousand
and
I
wonder
if
we
need
to
change
that
to
five.
If
that's
what
the
community
they
requested,
I.
E
D
D
E
A
I
think
in
the
interest
of
time
we'll
go
to
the
interviews
and
appointments
tonight
and
the
we
do
have
any
person
interested
in
being
a
trustee
of
the
Old
Brick
Church,
so
Mars
Butterfield.
If
you'd
come
forward
to
sit
at
the
table
with
a
microphone
and
that
doesn't
amplify.
So
if
you
can
speak
politely,
that
would
be
good.
H
I'm
Marge,
Butterfield
and
I
live
with
on
North
Williston
Road
and
I've
been
there
since
1985
with
my
husband
and
I'm
interested
in
I've,
been
actually
the
Old
Brick
Church
is
a
beautiful
and
historic
building
and
I've
always
admired
it
and
I.
It's
such
an
integral
part
of
the
village
I
would
like
to
help
in
the
stewardship
of
it.
H
Be
nice
if
we
could
have
it
used
more
one
thing
they
have
done
in
the
past
is
small,
weddings
and
I.
Think
if
we
advertise
I,
think
people
outside
of
Williston
don't
even
know
it's
a
nice
small
venue
and
if
you
could
maybe
even
advertise
in
the
local
papers
for
surrounding
towns,
you
could
get
I
mean
it's
perfect.
They
could
just
even
just
a
wedding
if
they
I
know
that's
not
accessible
for
handicapped
people,
but
if
they
had
their,
you
know
waiting
there.
H
D
H
D
D
D
H
C
H
D
Course,
yeah
yeah
I,
just
the
concern
is,
is
when
you
have
a
husband
and
wife
who
are
both
on
the
same
committee
would
be
that
you're
going
to
vote
as
a
block
you're
going
to
vote
together
and
what
I
would
I
and
that's
why
I
came
up
with
that
joke
and
I
would
like
to
hear
from
you.
No,
you
don't
see
that
being.
H
D
J
A
D
A
A
G
To
consider
a
motion
just
to
clarify
an
administrative
practice
of
how
we
assessed
our
water
connection,
fees
for
commercial
and
Industrial
users.
Typically,
we
look
at
Environmental
Protection
rules
from
the
state
to
come
up
with
what
the
maximum
daily
demand
is
on
the
water
system
and
in
circumstances
where
there's
not
a
specific
instance
listed
in
those
rules.
We
rely
on
the
engineer
from
the
applicant
to
provide
those
figures
for
us.
We
take.
J
I'd
move
to
clarify
that
water
system
connection
fees
are
calculated
using
Environmental
Protection
rules
for
the
state
and
further
move
that,
when
the
process
or
applicant
applying
has
a
use
not
covered
by
the
Environmental
Protection
rules
that
the
water
system
connection
fee
will
be
based
on
the
uses
estimated
maximum
daily
demand
in
gallons
per
day.
That
could
be
used
by
the
applicant
subject
to
a
review
and
approval
by
the
Williston
water.
D
A
D
D
D
D
K
D
D
D
D
They're,
oddly
they're,
oddly,
what's
the
word
cited
I,
don't
really
know
exactly
how
to
cite
them.
They're
concerned
the
Environmental
Protection
rules
and
within
the
Environmental
Protection
rules.
There
are
some
21
24
chapters,
chapter
1,
which
is
the
Wastewater
and
potable
Waters
I
didn't
get
it
quite
right,
I'm
sure,
I
know
it
just
from
the
Wastewater
side.
It
is
a
specific
one
of
those
specific
chapters
or
rules,
and
we
should
cite
the
chapter
I
believe
we
should
cite
the
chapter.
D
G
Right
citation
I
found
the
web
page
but
I
it's
similar
to
what
oh
you're
describing
it
Jeff.
It
says
these
are
the
dec
rules
and
regulations
summary
Rules
by
chapter.
Then
it
lists
each
chapter
in
chapter
one
as
you
referred
to
the
it's
named
drinking
water
and
groundwater
protection,
Division
and
the
rule
name
is
Wastewater
system
and
potable
water
supply
rules.
J
D
A
A
So
if
there
are
no
amendments,
then
to
the
motion
that
was
made
and
there's
no
further
discussion,
we
would
all
calls
for
a
vote
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
say
aye,
aye
I
think
we
have
four
eyes
so
that
takes
care
of
that
for
tonight
and
we'll
move
on
into
the
certificate
of
town,
highway,
mileage
and
Eric
when
I
speak
to
that
and
Bruce,
if
you're
having
to
add
to
it
as
well.
This.
G
Our
certificate
of
highway
mileage-
this
is
the
basis
of
all
our
town
highways
by
classification
in
town.
This
is
an
important
Doctrine
every
year
for
the
v-trans
mapping
division
because
it
also
determines
our
local
Aid
dollars,
based
on
our
roadway
types,
classification
of
our
total
mileage,
fairly
easy
and
straightforward
this
year,
I
think
there's
been
no
new
additions
to
highway
mileage
in
the
last
year,
so
our
total
is
94.492.
G
C
E
G
Planning
work
program
is
summarizes
the
projects
for
the
Chittenden
County
Regional
planning
commission's
focus
in
the
coming
year.
Each
town
in
the
region
is
asked
to
submit
requests
for
to
be
included
in
this
plan.
Typically,
the
planning
office
and
Public
Works
office
submit
requests
from
the
board's
review
each
year.
Included
is
a
memo
from
Matt
and
Bruce
that
outline
these
requests.
L
Terrific,
so
first
I
want
to
note
that
this
upwp
request
from
planning
or
this
slate
of
requests,
which
is
one
request
this
year,
is
a
little
different
from
last
year
when
we
had
I
believe
four
or
five
different
work
items.
We
were
asking
for
help
with
all
pretty
much
precipitating
from
the
form-based
code
project.
L
One
of
those
last
year
was
the
preparation
of
a
housing
needs
assessment,
which
Eric
alluded
to.
That
document
has
been
drafted
by
the
Vermont
Housing
Finance
Agency,
under
contract
with
ccrpc,
and
we
are
working
with
ccrpc
staff
to
finalize
that
needs
assessment
document
right
now.
We
hope
to
review
it
with
the
Planning
Commission
at
their
meeting
on
February
7th.
L
I
just
want
to
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
request.
The
follow-up
we
are
requesting
from
ccrpc
this
year,
because
we're
backing
away
from
necessarily
presupposing
that
inclusionary
zoning
is
is
the
only
solution
to
what
we
expect
the
the
needs
assessment
to
say
the
town
needs
in
fact
we're
going
to
back
away
even
one
step
further
and
say:
Here's
the
data
in
the
needs
assessment,
town
of
Williston,
first
Planning
Commission
and
then
hopefully
select
board
as
well.
L
L
Put
that
to
good
use
in
the
way
we
would
conduct
this
process
and
I'll
just
note.
Finally,
this
is
probably
one
of
the
last
really
big
policy
changes,
this
and
and
Village
bylaw,
which
is
well
in
progress
that
we'll
be
taking
on
ahead
of
the
beginnings
of
the
development
of
the
2025
comprehensive
plan.
L
One
of
the
reason
our
upwp
requests
are
pretty
light.
You
may
recall
we
wrote
a
municipal
planning,
Grant
request
and
we
are
looking
to
go
out
and
fund
a
very
significant,
deep
public
engagement
process
through
fy24
leading
up
to
the
development
of
that
town
plan.
So
that's
why
there's
only
one!
That's
why
it's
this
one
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
You
have
and
excited
to
be
sharing
the
needs
assessment
with
you
very
soon.
C
D
Totally
fine
with
with
what's
in
this,
my
question
is
about
inclusionary
zoning
I'm
a
fan,
but
I
also
wonder.
Are
we
too
far
along
in
terms
of
what
Williston
will
be
able
to
provide
in
terms
of
housing
for
inclusionary
zoning
to
be
effective?
It's
a
way
to
say
is
10
years
ago.
If
we
had
started
with
the
inclusionary,
zoning
Williston
would
probably
be
very
different
from
a
housing
makeup
standpoint
than
it
is
right
now,
but
I
I
guess.
My
question
is:
is
looking
forward?
Is
there
enough
room
in
terms
of
the
housing
stock?
D
L
Luckily,
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
mathematical
exercise.
We
we
can
look
back
at
what
we've
achieved
through
our
sort
of
more
incentive-based
system.
We
can
look
back
and
imagine
if
there
was
a
required,
affordable
component
of
some
amount
in
in
the
projects
that
we
saw
say
in
the
last
10
or
15
years.
What
that
might
look
like
I
caution,
looking
at
that
two
finely
detailed
because
one
of
the
other
elements
of
inclusionary
zoning
is
it
May
mean
that
some
projects
simply
aren't
feasible.
L
L
So
that's
something
to
think
about
and
certainly
something
to
look
forward
as
well
and
say:
well,
what
is
the
likely
build
out
and
what
might
requiring
an
affordable
component
look
like,
and
you
know
again,
we
have
some
examples
of
nearby
towns
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
that,
we'll
we'll.
Certainly
talk
about
the
administrative
challenges
of
managing
Perpetual
affordability
as
a
town
that
has
a
Housing
Trust
Fund,
but
you
know,
there's
there's
some
significant
challenges
we
face
in
managing
Perpetual
affordability
as
a
town
through
deed
restrictions
and
Covenants.
That
I
can
talk
about.
L
You
know
when
when
we
get
there
I
think
also
with
the
work
that
was
done
around
the
form-based
code
in
Tapped
Corners.
There
is
a
lot
of
opportunity
and
a
lot
of
development
potential
now
for
compact,
smart
growth
and
missing
middle
type
developments,
the
kinds
of
residential
projects
that
can
be
of
a
significant
enough
to
scale
to
integrate,
affordable
homes.
I
also
think
there
are
policy
changes
that
could
lead
to
more
projects
like
the
recent
Champlain
Housing
Trust
project.
That's
partially
open.
L
Now,
where
you
have
the
conversion
of
some
existing
structure
building,
in
that
case
a
hotel
to
affordable
homes,
and
there
are
policy
changes
like
the
ones
the
select
board
made
a
little
over
a
year
ago.
That
can
further
encourage
those
kinds
of
projects
to
land
in
the
right
places
in
Williston,
so
I
think
about
it.
A
little
bit
about
piggybacking
on
the
development
energy
that
we
think
is
going
to
continue
to
be
focused
on
the
town,
but
I
also
think
about
it.
Are
there?
Are
there
some
attractive,
Landing
places?
L
Williston
Creek
can
create
through
policy
through
budgeting
through
infrastructure
investment
that
will
bring
some
of
those
outside
parties
in
and
say
this
is
a
great
place
to
do
a
project
that
takes
advantage
of
low-income
housing,
tax
credits
or
that
takes
advantage
of
some
of
the
other
federal
and
state
programs
that
are
out
there
to
incentivize
the
development
of
affordable
homes.
So
there
are
some
policy
things.
There
are
some
ways
to
ask
for
housing
to
be
integrated
into
projects
that
might
come
to
Williston
anyway.
There's
also
things
that
I
think
that
can
be
done.
L
That
might
encourage
more
affordable
projects
to
come
to
Williston.
Again,
that's
why
I
want
to
start
with
some
goal.
Setting
because
I
don't
necessarily
have
a
clear
direction
from
everybody
in
this
room
or
the
Planning
Commission
of
to
what
level
can
we
talk
about
encouraging
Housing
Development
to
come
to
Williston?
That's
that's
really
different
from
the
historic
dialogue
around
housing
development
in
Williston.
It's
a
big
change
but
I
think
as
the
needs
assessment
will
show,
the
need
is
significant.
It
is
greater
than
it
really
has
ever
been.
D
D
E
A
K
Premium
yes
old,
Creamery
and
then
the
one
and
the
one
is
just
to
look
at
the
speed
limit
between
Williston
Road,
200,
Old
Creamery
on
Oak
Hill
Road.
And
if
you
remember
a
few
years
ago,
we
did
change
that
speed
limit
from
Williston
Road
up
to
the
entrance
to
South
Road.
Basically
just
up
over
the
bridge.
J
A
Very
discussion
on
the
motion
during
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
say:
aye
aye
aye,
and
we
have
four
yes
votes.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
and
we'll
move
on
then,
to
the
tell
me,
article,
retail
cannabis,
opt-in
requests
and
we
did
get
a
an
official
request
from
Graham,
Central
and
Eric
and
Matt.
Would
you
please
speak
to
this
yep.
G
Included
including
your
packet
from
three
business
owners
who
have
a
retail
cannabis
establishment
in
Montpelier
I'm,
asking
that
the
question
of
allowing
retail
cannabis
sales
and
will
soon
be
added
to
the
town
meeting
2023
warning.
As
a
reminder,
State
Statute
allows
municipality,
sold
an
opt-in
vote
for
retail
cannabis
sales.
Should
a
petition
for
such
an
article
be
received
by
the
deadline
of
this
Thursday
January
19th,
which
meets
the
requirements
for
a
petition
article
that
you
need
to
be
placed
on
the
warning.
If
there
was
not
a
petition
received
it's
at
the
board's
discretion.
G
G
They
haven't
presented
in
their
letter,
whether
their
rules
and
residents
or
not
I've
communicated
with
them
a
couple
times
since
receiving
their
letter,
inviting
them
to
speak
this
evening,
but
I
haven't
received
any
communication
back
and
I,
don't
see
them
here
or
on
Zoom,
so
I
can
leave
it
to
the
to
the
board's
discussion.
You
have
this
request
for
you.
I
also
thought
this
might
be
a
good
time
to
preview.
E
G
And
DT
digger
I
think
paints
an
a
good
picture
of
what
Burlington
is
looking
at
and
we're
seeing
that
with
other
towns
too,
with
love
information,
that's
being
transmitted
for
potential
approval,
biology
and
there's
a
lot
of
at
the
state
level.
There's
a
lot
of
information
that
is
currently
needing
to
be
redacted
and
thinking
about
what
that
means
from
a
zoning
use.
G
Approval
standpoint,
similar
to
when
we,
the
board,
serves
as
a
liquor
control
board
I
checked
with
planning
to
make
sure
that
the
application
meets
the
planning
requirements
and
kind
of
kind
of
getting
ahead
to
our
conversation
here,
but
looking
to
potentially
see
if
there's
a
similar
Avenue
for
there's
a
local
cannabis,
Control
Commission
in
town,
it's
got
the
or
view
the
requested
for
the
board.
Tonight
the
board
was
interested
in
adding
an
article
regarding,
or
a
retail
cannabis.
G
L
So
you
know
mostly
what
I
might
be
able
to
contribute
to.
This
is
to
refresh
the
board's
memory
on
zoning
Provisions
that
were
adopted
in
Williston
in
anticipation
that
an
opt-in
vote
might
happen
at
some
point
and
also
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
perspective,
of
what
I
am
seeing
out
in
the
broader
planning
world
of
how
this
is
going,
and
so
first
just
keep
in
mind.
L
L
When
we
did
the
form
base
code
in
Taft
Corners,
that
was
part
of
the
logic
of
adopting
it
as
an
overlay
was
that
we
would
leave
the
underlying
zoning
districts
there
and
not
touch
them
largely
because
we
had
just
gone
through
this
effort
of
of
deciding
where
cannabis
retail
might
be
allowed.
And-
and
you
know
we
might-
we
might
clean
that
up
eventually,
I.E
make
the
TC
form-based
code
district,
its
own
zoning
district
and
get
rid
of
the
underlying
districts,
but
that
would
have
an
impact
on
the
Cannabis
boundary.
L
We
didn't
want
to
do
that
as
part
of
that
project.
So
a
couple
of
things
when
we
reviewed
this
act,
164
had
just
very
recently
become
law
and
what
act
164
has
to
say
about
local
Authority
Under.
Zoning
is
quite
brief
and
we
thought
in
2020
when
that
happened,
that
it
was
very
likely
that
the
actual
authority
of
a
town
to
deal
with
retail
cannabis
under
zoning
would
would
likely
be
shaped
largely
by
the
activities
of
the
state,
cannabis
control
board
and
at
the
time
I
was
reviewing
my
memo.
L
I
I
talked
about
it
in
terms
of
rule,
making
hasn't
really
been
rule
making
around
this.
That
I
can
discern,
but
there's
been
a
lot
of
statements
made
by
the
Cannabis
control
board,
and
the
ones
that
have
really
stuck
out
for
me
are
a
statement
that
you
can't
regulate
cannabis,
retail
any
differently
than
any
other
kind
of
retail.
L
Well,
we
do
in
our
zoning
bylaw.
We
say
it
needs
approval
by
the
drb.
Not
not
all
you
know,
establishments
of
a
retail
use
in
an
existing
building
have
to
go
to
the
drb.
Most
of
them
are
administrative,
because
the
state
law
contains
a
buffer
zone
from
schools.
The
state
CCB
statement
has
been
you.
You
can't
have
buffer
zones
in
zoning.
Well
that
that
100
feet
from
a
residential
parcel
is
a
type
of
buffer
zone.
L
I've
I've
interacted
a
little
bit
with
some
fellow
planners
on
this,
as
well
as
staff
at
the
Vermont
League
of
cities
and
towns.
I
would
say,
broadly
there's
quite
a
bit
of
frustration
among
folks
who
do
local
land
use.
In
that
again,
the
way
the
law
changed
under
164
is
very
brief.
It
says
you,
you
can't
do
anything
to
cannabis,
retail
and
Zoning
that
you
couldn't
do
to
anything
else
in
zoning.
Well,
zoning
lets
us
do
all
kinds
of
things
we
can
require
certain
things
to
be
conditional
uses.
L
L
We
don't
treat
any
other
kind
of
retail
that
way,
but
zoning
and
the
zoning
Authority
in
Vermont
has
has
allowed
communities
to
treat
retailers
that
way
before
so
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
that
the
town,
if,
if
somebody
just
read
our
zoning,
they
might
assume
the
town
had
some
Authority
that
it
might
not
end
up
having
vis-a-vis
retail
so
broadening
out
a
little
bit
more.
We
have
not
said
anything
specific
in
zoning
about
any
of
the
other
tiers
of
of
cannabis,
licensed
growing
manufacturing
Etc,
where
we
have
had
cannabis.
L
Manufacturers
want
to
come
into
town.
My
statement
has
been
I'm
going
to
treat
it
like
any
other
kind
of
manufacturing
and
take
it
through
the
permitting
process
and
I
will
see
it.
As
being
allowed
anywhere
else,
that
manufacturing
is
allowed,
so
we've
had
a
couple
folks,
processors
or
manufacturers.
Where
can
I
go
in
town?
Well,
generally,
the
industrial
district
great
can
I
get
a
permit.
L
Okay,
let's
look
at
your
waste
water
and
a
permit
is
signed,
and
then
we
have
I
think
at
least
two
that
have
been
through
that
permitting
process
in
the
industrial
part
of
Williston
growing
has
been
a
little
more
of
a
challenge.
Nobody
has
asked
me
for
a
permit
for
an
indoor
or
outdoor
growing
operation.
L
It
does
not
enjoy
the
same
exemption
that
other
agricultural
practices
enjoy
from
zoning,
but
williston's
bylaws
certainly
allow
a
broad
variety
of
Agriculture,
not
just
exempt
agriculture
in
our
agricultural,
rural
residential
Zone
indoor
growing
when
I've
been
asked
about
it,
I've
said
well.
I
would
I
would
treat
that
like
a
kind
of
manufacturing,
it's
typically
going
to
happen
in
an
industrial
building,
but
I
am
aware
that
a
state
license
was
pursued
by
somebody
in
Williston
at
one
point
to
grow
out
of
their
home
and
I'm.
L
Then,
if
this
group
were
to
convene
as
a
local
cannabis,
Control
Commission,
it
would
be
able
to
inquire
of
me
via
Eric.
Are
they
in
compliance
with
zoning
and
what
is
being
said
in
some
communities?
Is
that
if
you
have
that
system
in
place?
Well,
now
you've
got
to
tell
the
zoning
administrator
where
this
is
going,
because
the
zonings
are
they.
L
They
have
to
know
where
it
is
in
order
to
know
what
zoning
districts
it's
in
and
whether
it's
permitted
and
under
what
process,
and
then
that
information
is
recorded
in
the
land,
use,
permit
and
I
believe
the
select
board
sitting
as
cannabis.
Control
Commission
would
be
privy
to
it.
But
this
is
all
stuff
that
a
lot
of
our
neighboring
communities
are
are
figuring
out
and
it's
a
bit
of
a
challenge,
so
I
think
I.
L
Think
when
I
talked
with
the
with
the
select
board
about
putting
a
retail
opt-in
vote
on
the
ballot
two
years
ago,
he
sort
of
said
I.
I
really
can't
give
you
a
complete
picture
of
exactly
how
this
is
all
going
to
work
out
and
exactly
what
level
of
say
you
might
have
and
I'm
afraid.
I'm
still
a
little
bit
in
that.
In
that
scenario,
my
my
perspective
is,
it
does
make
sense
to
become
a
Control
Commission
to
review
licenses.
A
And
may
I
just
say
that
when
the
individual
talked
to
me
on
the
phone,
probably
five
or
six
weeks
ago,
she
had-
or
he
at
that
point
had
spoken
to
Matt
about
the
process
and
referred
to
me
for
the
process.
Tonight.
Hello
I
thought
I
had
mentioned
to
that
person
that
sooner
than
later
than
later
was
better,
and
this
is
going
to
take
in
my
mind
a
lot
more
discussion
than
we
have
either
tonight
or
certainly
before
the
the
ballots
are
out
so
questions
for
for
Matt.
G
D
D
We
don't
totally
understand
what
it
is,
what
the
process
would
be
in
which
a
retail
establishment
would
be
allow
permitted
to
come
into
Williston,
and
my
question
is:
is:
is
it
important
that
we
do
that
before
this
gets
out
becomes
a
before
it
becomes
an
a
question
on
the
ballot,
or
is
it
something
where
you
can
have
the
question
on
the
ballot
and
answer
these?
You
have
time
after
that
to
answer
these
questions?
Does
that
make
sense.
L
G
D
So
and
just
let
me
make
sure
I
understand
so
literally,
we
could
have
our
boat
at
town
meeting
if
it
was
on
the
ballot
and
we
and
it's
it's
a
positive
vote
enough
more
people
vote
for
it
than
vote
against
it.
Within
that
30-day
period,
somebody
could
submit
an
application
to
this
state
cannabis
control
board.
L
G
L
Think
that's
just
going
to
take
some
time
to
shake
out
okay,
knowing
knowing
what
I
know
now
and
having
heard
what
I've
heard
said
at
those
CCB
meetings
and
information
sessions,
I
I
feel
on
a
little
shakier
ground
about
some
of
the
zoning
we
drafted
two
years
ago.
That
doesn't
surprise
me,
but
you
know
in
in
this
particular
case,
I
think
a
wait
and
see
approach
is
a
little
more
prudent
in
terms
of
being
able
to
predict
your
outcomes.
D
And
I
just
I,
you
know
I'm
going
to
point
out
the
reason
why
I'm
asking
these
questions
is
because
I
am
not
particularly
concerned
about
whether
Willison
does
or
does
not
have
retail
cannabis.
You
know
whatever,
whatever
stores,
whatever
I
should
refer
to
them.
I'm,
not
particularly
concerned
about
that,
because
I
look
at
some
of
the
things
we
already
permit,
you
can
buy
tobacco,
a
pretty
addictive.
You
know,
substance
in
in
Williston
and
alcohol,
so
I'm
not
concerned
about
the
retail
at
I'm,
not
concerned
about
there
being
retail
in
Williston.
D
B
D
I
think
you
brought
up
a
good
point,
and
Matt
also
alluded
to
it
right
now.
You
know
if
we
were
to
if
we
were
to
put
this
on
the
ballot
meeting
us
at
select
board
we'd
want
to
provide
voters
with
a
very
a
very
robust
information
about
the
initiative,
and
it
sounds
like
right
now.
We
can't
because
there
are
so
many
unknowns,
yep.
J
J
J
J
I
and
I
go.
This
gets
past
this,
but
we'll
have
this
conversation
probably
a
year
from
now,
but
there
there
are
so
many
other
things
that
the
state
did
not
get
ready
for.
By
way
of
example,
I
I
am
very
much
in
favor
of
the
0.08
blood
alcohol
content,
DUI
standard.
It's
a
public
safety
thing.
People
who
drive
high
on
marijuana
are
also
a
danger
to
Public
Safety,
but
we
don't
have
the
testing
mechanism
in
place
where
it
would
be
efficient.
Instead,
we
have
drug
recognition,
experts
where
you
know
and
I'll
tell
you.
J
I've
I've
won
cases
and
motions
to
suppress,
because
nobody
knows
what
they're
doing
and
they
arrest
the
guy
saying.
I,
don't
know
whether
you're
high
or
not,
but
you're
under
arrest
come
on
back
to
the
station,
and
you
know
the
case
gets
thrown
out.
It's
there's
just
so
many
things
that
are
not
in
place
that
I
can't
I
can't
be
in
favor
of
this.
At
this
point,.
A
So
I
think
the
undetermination
is
that
we
will
not
Place
us
on
the
ballot
for
this
town
meeting,
so
we'll
move
on
and
think
about
it.
Thank
you,
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
the
arpa
funding
allocations,
and
surely
it's
probably
about
time
for
me
to
come
to
the
table
and
as
we're
starting
to
do
all
of
the
financial
stuff
here.
G
Of
run
through
where
we
are
on
budget
items
and
there's
motions
for
the
board
to
consider
on
all
these
tonight
to
wrap
up
the
budget
process,
but
certainly
if
the
board
like
to
make
any
additional
adjustments
or
changes
you,
you
have
room
to
and
time
to
make
those
so
from
staff
to
kind
of
I.
Put
these
in
a
sequence
that
I
felt
made
made
sense
to
consider
approval.
G
Certainly,
we've
got
each
one
as
we
go
stuff
take
direction
from
the
board
on
these
items
here,
so
starting
with
the
Arca
funding
allocations,
we've
discussed
them
during
our
2024
budget
development
process,
the
last
couple
of
months
so
for
projects
and
pump
and
funding
sources
in
the
fiscal
year,
24
operating
Capital
budgets
after
last
meeting
Shirley
and
I
were
reviewing
the
structure
of
our
allocations
and
we
discussed
previously.
We
designed
arpa
as
its
own
fund
for
allocation
authorization
and
spending.
G
In
my
transmitted
budget
proposal,
last
December
I
had
arpa
funds
included
in
the
operating
budget
for
General
operating
revenue
of
125
000
and
for
the
police
retention
incentive
final
year
about
92
500
to
cover
that
expense.
As
we
review
this
further.
Our
suggestion
is
removing
the
transfer
of
the
retention
and
sensitive
incentive
arpa
funds-
that's
essentially
flowing
into
the
general
funds,
along
with
the
expense
and
instead
consider
authorizing
the
expense
directly
from
the
arpa
funds,
among
others,
have
been
discussed
from
an
accounting
standpoint.
This
would
achieve
the
same
result
as
an
effect
of
general
fund.
G
Bottom
line
could
be
decreased
by
the
retention
incentive
amount,
so
we're
thinking
instead
of
transferring
the
money
into
the
general
fund
to
then
allocate
for
that
purpose.
We
can
just
allocate
for
that
purpose
from
the
arpa
fund.
Such
we
have
a
revenue
going
in
and
expense
going
on,
the
general
funds
we
achieved
the
same
effect,
accounting,
wise
and
then
it
also
well.
G
The
bottom
line
can
be
a
little
bit
lower
as
well
as
a
result
there,
just
with
with
the
movement
of
funds,
so
we've
included
in
the
agenda
summary
memo
and
the
updated
Alpha
funds
allocation
table
that
we
shared
earlier
in
the
budget
process.
For
your
consideration,
just
to
recap,
what's
been
discussed
here
to
date,
that's
included
in
this
memo
and
I've
suggested
should
the
board
of
which
consider
it
a
motion
to
allocate
These
funds
as
a
record.
G
So
the
operating
budget
Revenue
transfer
ends
of
125
000,
the
capital
budget
transfer
in
of
176
thousand
dollars
listed
in
capital
projects
in
The
Proposal
before
you,
the
police
retention
incentive
year,
three
of
three
ninety
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
the
purchase
of
the
second
sidewalk
plow
discussed
at
last
week's
meeting
for
seventy
thousand
dollars
and
the
police
department.
Service
delivery
analysis
report
discussed
at
last
me
as
well
for
thirty
thousand
dollars.
The
total
of
these
allocations
would
be
493
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
to
date.
G
D
G
As
we
presented
last
spring
would
be
in
May
of
each
year,
so
may
of
22
is
the
first
year.
This
may
is
the
second
year
and
then
third
year
we
had,
we
had
stepped
it
2500
2500,
5
000..
So
this
this
budget
right
now
is
the
5
000
number.
Okay,
a
year
three
amount
you
propose
to
be
funded
without
the
funds.
D
G
E
G
G
Right
now,
I
was
a
three-year
incentive
program.
It's
seemingly
working
we've
maintained
our
staff.
We've
attracted
a
couple
new
staff
members,
but
it's
also
retention
or
a
recruitment
incentive
as
well,
but
and
answer
your
questions.
We'd
have
to
reassess
it
in
the
future,
but
this
was
the
the
largest
piece
of
the
the
discussion
the
board
had
for
year.
Three
for
okay.
J
A
C
G
The
budget
changes
we've
identified
over
the
last
week
and
thanks
to
Shirley
for
leading
us
this
process,
we've
found
some
expense
reductions
and
some
Revenue
additions
after
we
did
a
final,
thorough
examination
with
each
department
of
their
budgets.
This
overall
budget
bottom
line
represents
a
6.3
percent
increase
over
the
End
by
23
budget.
We
were
able
to
make
it
a.
G
Lower
than
the
managers
transmitted
budget
includes
of
a
6.5
percent
so
partially
due
to
rethinking
about
the
allocation
of
this
as
well
and
what
makes
the
most
sense
for
an
accounting
standpoint,
Shirley's
prepared
in
your
packet
and
updated
document
that
we
worked
off
of
from
last
week.
That
shows
the
changes
proposed
reflective
of
your
discussion
at
last
week's
meeting
proposed
for
this
evening
with
business
budget
number
and
on
the
back
of
page.
D
G
G
D
E
G
Can
highlight
a
few
here
kind
of
thinking
separately
from
the
arpa
funds
movement,
because
you
know
the
task
we
looked
at
was
identifying
about
just
over
seventy
thousand
dollars
of
General
funds
on
expense
reductions
or
Revenue
additions.
So
we
found
a
couple
reductions
in
capital
for
the
police
department,
with
some
of
their
sinking
of
their
project,
funds
for
firearms
replacement,
Traffic,
Safety,
Capital,
Equipment
replacement.
G
We
also
across
departments
looked
at
our
vehicle
fuel
prices.
We
had
data
from
last
October
November
and
we're
seeing
a
favorable
Trend
that
the
prices
have
been
decreasing
the
last
couple
of
months,
so
surely
analyze
those
with
departments
and
we
were
able
to
decrease
the
fuel
costs
based
on
the
current
Financial
environments,
that
was
in
police,
Public,
Works
and
and
fire
we've
just
we're
just
wrapping
up
a
new
vendor
for
our
ambulance
billing
service
fee
and
it's
it's
lower
than
what
we
used
with
Bear
City.
G
So
we
estimated
finally
about
ten
thousand
dollars
in
savings
with
that
just
kind
of
came
up
in
the
last
week
or
so,
as
we
worked
through
that
agreement
also
some
reduction
in
the
training
expenses,
the
fire
department
I
had
a
little
bit
of
money
for
the
PD
study
and
funding
it
all
through.
Our
bug
moved
five
thousand
dollars
out
of
the
manager's
budget.
For
that
with
the
recreation
and
parks.
G
G
We
typically
we
take
our
Revenue
estimates
very
conservatively,
so
we
leave
some
room
for
movement
and
we
took
a
final
good
look
at
it
and
we
were
comfortable
in
some
additional
Recreation
program
fees
and
field
use
fees
based
on
historic
use
and
that's
just
over
nine
thousand
same
with
the
planning
department.
We're
comfortable
with
additional
permit
fee.
Revenue
right
spoken
that
and
looked
looked
some
more
of
our
previous
year's
experience.
We.
G
An
oversight
initially
as
booking
some
Public
Works
Revenue
under
General
miscellaneous,
that
was
a
good
catch
by
Shirley,
giving
everything
a
final
look:
we're
comfortable,
increasing
our
interest
in
our
Revenue
about
2500
and
local
option
tax
that
try
to
take
a
really
conservative
approach.
Every
year
and
honestly,
I
felt
as
we
were,
trying
to
get
over
the.
D
D
What
I
can
say
about
that
is
being
on
that
committee
has
made
it
it's
very
clear
to
me
that
that
is
a
shoestring
budget.
There
are
things
that,
when
you
have
a
resource
such
as
the
Catamount
Community
Forest,
it
takes
resources
to
maintain
it
to
have
it
reach
the
potential
in
terms
of
the
goals
that
were
just.
You
know
that
we
envisioned
why
we
wanted
that
property.
In
the
first
place
we
as
a
community
resource
and
I,
don't
know
how
else
to
put
it
other
than
3
000
as
an
annual
budget.
D
Isn't
enough
I,
don't
know
what
else
I
can
add.
We
asked
for
five
thousand
I
said
well.
The
committee
asked
for
5
000,
that's
probably
not
enough
also,
but
we
that's
what
we
felt
comfortable
asking
for
so
I
would
ask
that
you
considered
in
a
two
thousand
dollar
increase
to
that,
because
it's
going
to
help
the
community.
You
know
it's
going
to
help
that
resource.
That.
A
May
I
suggest
that
the
the
budget
is
just
essentially
a
suggestion
that
how
all
the
Departments
will
will
work.
My
guess
is
that
there
are.
We
will
find
a
couple
thousand
dollars
somewhere
within
the
budget,
to
increase
that,
if
the,
if
that
commission
decides
that
they
want
to
have
more
money
and
request
it
from
the
select
warrant
and
I
that
would
be
my,
my
guess,
is:
we've
got
a
a
budget
in
place
right
now
we
are
proposing
a
budget
in
place
that
would
take
care
of
all
the
the
current
requests.
D
Okay
and
that
that's
fine
I
just
you
know
the
things
that
I
would
never
even
thought
about
when
we
were
deciding
whether
the
town
should
go
ahead
and
purchase
yeah.
Well,
we
brought
in
a
great
Ally
to
helping
that
happen.
You
know
things
like
invasives
management
or
trying
to
protect
the
you
know
the
habitat.
That's
there
for
things
like
birds
and
it
it.
It's
been
an
eye-opener
for
me
that
you
know,
like
anything,
that
costs
money.
A
B
I
might
suggest
I
mean
we
are
going
to
discuss
it
in
a
bit,
but
a
community
engagement
with
the
arpa
funds,
so
I
mean
obviously
that
wouldn't
be
a
you
know,
a
specific
yearly
allotted
amount,
but
to
maybe
dream
bigger
for
the
Academy
committee
and
see
if
there
are
projects
that
could
be
funded
through.
You
know
arpa,
because
that
is
I.
Think
truly.
The
intent
of
those
funds
was
to
you
know
for
the
Greater
Community
benefit,
and
there
is
you
know,
kind
of
No
Greater
Community
benefit
than
than
the
Catamount
Forest.
I
I
C
I
A
G
The
changes
here
I
thought
it
would
be
easiest
to
summarize
them
with
just
our
our
our
sheet
in
your
in
your
book.
That
shows
the
next
year's
funding,
so
the
changes
you'll
see
in
here
I'll
just
call
them
out
of
the
police
traffic
safety.
Equipments
decrease
2500
the
police
Firearms
zeroed
out,
as
that
expense
just
occurred.
So
those
are
two
reductions
in
that
in
that
line
that
I've
inserted
at
the
top
section.
G
G
G
D
B
B
B
D
A
E
A
D
Just
one
hopefully
quick
question
under
in
the
third,
whereas
it
identifies
I
what
I'm
going
to
call
the
balance,
unspend
proceeds
of
132
000
and
then
in
the
fifth,
whereas
it
it
identifies.
You
know
the
solar
project
at
125..
My
question
is:
is:
does
this
need
to
address
the
difference?
The
seven
thousand
dollar
difference
there,
or
no,
because
we're
not
doing
anything
with
that,
but.
D
B
J
B
E
G
Is
the
second
necessity
resolution,
as
discussed
upon
the
warning,
a
bond
item
for
the
Amber
for
the
purchase
of
the
new
ambulance?
Maybe
call
the
voters
approve
this
at
town
meeting
2022
and
we
use
language
for
a
short-term
borrowing.
After
consulted
with
our
town
attorney
and
the
bond
Bank,
we
felt
it's
best
to
kind
of
cover
all
our
bases
to
reward
this
question
for
the
possibilities
on
sale.
We
feel
essentially,
this
would
be
a
way
to
get
a
lower
interest
rate
and
save
the
taxpayers.
Some
money
on
this
purchase.
G
D
G
G
Emotions
culminate
in
a
warning
for
the
board
to
consider
this
evening
a
summer
and
final
form,
I've
had
the
town
attorney
review.
The
initial
draft
I've
plugged
in
the
budget
numbers
that
you've
approved
this
evening,
the
Articles
written
for
the
two
Bond
related
questions,
and
then
the
additional
articles
are
election.
G
Local
offices
that
I
had
town
clerk,
Sarah
masonry
review
as
well
as
discussed
previously
I've
structured
town
meeting
back
to
our
free
pandemic
format,
with
a
with
a
meeting
business
conducting
March
6th
and
the
Central
School
auditorium
with
the
Articles
we've
seen
in
Prior
years.
Some
I've
also
chatted
with
our
Tony
lamb
who's
been
elected,
Town
moderator
for
a
number
of
years
and
said,
if
so
elected
at
the
meeting,
he
plans
to
attend
an
resume
his
duties.
G
G
A
B
A
G
So
I've
been
wanting
to
get
into
this
in
the
New
Years
or
wrapping
up
the
budget
process,
the
last
couple
of
months
to
think
for
the
board
to
think
about
our
arpa
community
engagement
process.
So
I
cap
that
right,
we'll
have
about
1.8
million
dollars,
unallocated
out
of
the
funds
for
the
board
to
decide
how
to
allocate
by
the
end
of
2020.
G
.
we'll
share
the
updated
allocations
to
date
with
you
this
evening
as
part
of
your
materials
and
a
number
of
capital
projects
for
the
town
operational
projects,
ways
to
offset
revenue
for
a
couple
years,
step
down
to
reduce
tax
impact,
I
decided
to
reach
out
to
fellow
managers
in
the
County's
kind
of
where
they
are
in
their
process
and
where
their
boards
Council
are
I.
G
With
most
of
them
at
this
point,
there's
been
kind
of
a
broader
way
of
where
towns
are
town
like,
for
example,
one
end
of
the
spectrum,
Colchester
algae
at
other
funds
for
their
sewer
extension
project
that
they
approved
for
the
bond
vote
for
the
ballots.
Last
year,
other
towns
haven't
spent
any
ARCA
money.
Some
towns,
like
us,
have
and
South
Burlington
has
been
spending
out
the
money
on
capital
projects,
some
positions.
They
reduce
their
course
from
during
the
pandemic
to
bring
them
back.
G
Other
towns,
Essex,
Shelburne,
South,
Burlington
they've
done
some
initial
Community
surveys
and
their
boards
and
City
councils
right
now
are
kind
of
sifting
through
the
feedback
they
received
and
thinking
about
a
priority,
a
priority
approach
and
then
how
to
kind
of
discern
those
requests
and
how
to
make
those
allocations.
What
methodology
they'd
like
to
use
I've.
E
G
I'm
thinking
a
comprehensive
engagement
strategy,
similar
where
red
is
on
the
steering
Community
for
the
Beauty
Center
and
a
getting
some
good
ideas
from
our
Consultants
on
that,
but
really
looking
at
something
that
going
to
people
getting
feedback
having
other
mechanisms,
whether
it's
in
presentations,
some
online,
some
kind
of
postcard,
mailers
and
things
of
that
nature.
Think
about
making
sure
we
reach
everyone
but
meeting
them
where
they
are.
G
E
G
G
G
Leg
of
the
stool,
I
good
feedback
from
the
CSL
for
lunch,
and
they
asked
their
policy
advisory
committees
and
boards
for
ideas
as
well.
I'd
suggest
the
select
board
may
want
to
consider
something
similar
where
you
could
look
to
the
boards,
the
Committees,
just
to
give
you
some
some
ideas,
kind
of
invaded
that
the
Kavanaugh
discussion
a
while
ago.
G
G
That's
come
up
before
you
know,
I've
venture
to
say
unlikely
to
happen
again,
and
then
your
term
to
have
this
Federal
money
to
to
look
at
I
shared
in
my
memo,
the
lct's
kind
of
guiding
Frameworks
here
that
look
at
prioritizing
good
governance,
leveraging
our
arpa
Aid
with
these
other
sources
coming
out
there
and
investing
in
best
uses
for
long-term
recovery
to
try
to
think
about
Delta
between
those
sections
of
the
Venn
diagram
here.
So
so
talk
about
this
for
a
little
bit.
G
E
G
B
D
I,
don't
have
good
input,
I
I
other
than
I
I
would
like
to
see
as
much
Community
involvement
in
these
decisions
as
possible,
but
how
we
get
that
when
I
looked
at
that
process,
where
we
adopted
the
form
or
we
developed
and
then
adopted
the
form-based
code,
the
involvement
there
would
be
a
great
goal
for
the
involvement
here.
I
think
that's
a
lot
easier
said
than
done
so
I
don't
have
much
constructive
input
on
this.
Sorry,
one.
D
Is
we
do
have
a
captive
audience
at
both
town
meeting,
but
probably
more
important
at
the
Australian
ballot
and
maybe
there's
a
way
in
which
we
could
have
something
there?
What
was
it?
The
doyle
I'm?
Not
quite
sure,
that's
the
exactly,
but
if
there
was
something
that
I
mean
rarely
do
it's
difficult
to
get
that
much
of
Williston
to
go
through
a
room
in
a
day.
So
maybe
if
we
could
take
advantage
of
that.
D
G
D
C
C
G
A
site
clean
up
work
to
do
still,
but
so
that
that
that
project
should
be
should
be
wrapped
up.
I,
don't
know
the
final
cost
just
yet,
but
we
are
getting
5
000
towards
the
the
pay
for
it
from
a
community
cleanup
fund
at
the
solid
waste
District
administers,
and
that's
money
that
accumulates
you
can
spend
it
on
a
project
that
will
accumulate
again,
but
I
do
know
it
will
be
likely
well
over
the
five
thousand
dollars.
G
Okay,
I
came
to
the
other
abatement
and
Analysis
of
the
structure
before
we
could
even
remove
it
to
make
sure
there
are
no
hazards
so
I'll
keep
the
board
updated
on
where
we
land
there
Matt
mentioned
earlier.
The
housing
needs
assessment
is
wrapping
up
and
the
Planning
Commission
will
get
that
early.
February
and
I'll
need
to
speak
about
planning
for
having
a
presentation
with
select
board
to
walk
through,
walk
through
that
I've
seen
an
initial
draft
and
I
think
the
results.
G
E
C
G
Landlords
accepted
the
changes
I
discussed
at
the
Town
attorney
after
our
last
meeting.
I
expect
to
sign
it
tomorrow
and
they'll
sign
up
this
week.
So
that's
just
about
set
and
we'll
do
a
little
upfit
in
the
building,
and
we
should
hopefully
be
in
there
in
February
and
hope
we
started
off
the
programming.
Sometimes
that's.
B
A
The
poll
has
been
completed
to
through
Eric
and
we
had
one
person
who
received
three
votes.
We
had
three
people
who
received
two
votes
and
one
person
who
received
one
vote
and
it
was
a
thought
that
we
had
that
since
the
last
two
County
reports
really
have
not
recognized
any
individual
that
it
might
be
at
the
time
to
recognize
at
least
the
four
people
who
received
the
the
most
votes.
So
if
that's
acceptable
to
the
board,
then
we
will
go
forward
with
that.
You.
D
A
So
we'll
go
forward
with
that
idea.
Then
great,
thank
you
any
other
business
that
we
need
to
take
up
tonight
because
of
our
business
that
we
did
tonight
where
there'll
be
no
meeting
next
week,
so
that
that's
our
big
thank
you,
everyone
for
all
of
the
hard
work
that
you've
done
in
the
past
two
and
a
half
months
on
putting
this
together,
and
thank
you
all
very
much
and
if
there's
no
other
business
that
people
have
I
will
say
or
adjourned
right.
Yes,.