►
From YouTube: Williston Development Review Board - 8/22/2022
Description
https://linktr.ee/townmeetingtv
00:00:00 Call to Order
00:05:14 Public Comment
00:06:22 DP 09-17.1 White Cap Ventures LLC
00:11:30 DP 23-01 Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
00:40:42 DP 22-06 Green State Realty LLC
01:35:37 Communication, Final Plans and Other Business
01:35:46 DP 18-06.3 VT Hotel Group LLC
01:56:27 Post Deliberation Motions
01:59:54 Minutes
This video belongs to http://www.cctv.org and published with permission under Creative Commons License CCTV Center for Media & Democracy Programming is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A
A
If
you
are
a
zoom
participant,
please
sign
in
and
rename
yourself
if
your
name
is
not
on
your
participant
toolbar.
This
is
a
hybrid
meeting
taking
place
at
the
police
building
here
in
williston
and
virtually
on
zoom
all
members
of
the
board
and
the
public
can
communicate
in
real
time.
Planning
staff
will
provide
zoom
instructions
for
public
participation.
Before
we
begin
all
votes
taken
at
this
meeting
will
be
done
by
roll
call
vote
in
accordance
with
the
law.
If
zoom
crashes,
the
meeting
will
be
continued
to
september
13
2022..
A
B
B
On
the
left
hand,
side
we
have
the
mute
button,
and
that
turns
your
microphone
on
and
off.
Please
keep
your
microphone
youtube
when
you're,
not
speaking,
we
have
the
stop
start.
Video
for
your
camera.
Camera
is
optional.
We
have
the
chat
button
which
you
can
use.
If
you
need
to
ask
for
technical
help,
please
don't
give
public
testimonial
chat
when
you
do
get
public
testimony.
B
B
We
do
recommend
you
use
side
by
side
mode.
Your
zoom
should
automatically
default
to
this,
but
if
it
doesn't,
you
can
switch
to
it
by
clicking
the
view
options.
Next
to
the
green
rectangle,
the
top
of
your
screen
scrolling
down
side
by
side
mode
and
clicking
here
and
then
using
the
vertical
sliders
in
the
middle
there,
ringed
in
red
allows
you
to
adjust
the
size
of
the
the
video
and
the
screen
we're
looking
at.
Lastly,
if
you
are
having
a
bad
internet
connection,
you
can
try
a
number
of
things.
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
Just
to
clarify
that
one
of
the
wall
signs
is
illuminated.
It's
marked,
as
eliminated
on
one
area
normally
known
to
another,
and
the
freestanding
entrance
sign
that
was
approved
back
in
2009
was
just
marked
his
32
stuffy
plane
away.
It
was
clearly
approved
at
47
square
feet
last
time,
so
just
clearing
up
that
discrepancy.
A
C
B
D
A
F
A
B
So
staff
is
recommending
that
the
grb
take
testimony
discuss
the
site
plan
with
the
applicant,
in
particular,
regard
to
landscaping
and
pedestrian
safety,
close
the
hearing
and
delivery
tonight.
Staff
is
recommending
approval
with
conditions
we
did
receive
comments
from
both
public
works
and
the
fire
department.
B
B
B
B
To
this,
I
guess
it's
the
west
boundary
this
map
is
actually
flipped,
so
north
is
down
and
south
is
up
to
the
west
boundary
this
one
just
merges
into
walmart
parking
lot.
The
other
areas
down
here.
So
we've
got
a
very
large
store
here.
Storage
area
area,
four,
which
uses
both
north
park
and
we've
got
a
lumber
storage.
Here
there
were
two:
we've
also
got
pro
parking,
which
I
think
is
just
an
existing
use.
B
The
pedestrian
access
will
not
be
allowed
to
the
area
four,
which
is
the
north
parking
lot.
They
are
going
to
secure
vehicle
vehicle
access
at
the
existing
sort
of
drive
aisles
with
jersey
barriers,
which
probably
sort
of
landscape
the
screen
down
here,
but
it
is
sort
of
visible
as
you
come
in.
There
has
been
this
type
of
confusion
with
people
going
in
there.
B
B
B
A
F
E
F
Anything
I
would
rather
have
some
additional
chivalry
around
those
islands
in
order
to
enclose
that
area
a
little
bit
better
and
still
provide
the
jersey
barriers.
The
jersey,
berries
are
orange,
it
will
be,
you
know,
easily
visible
think
it
will
also
be
easier
for
to
be
moved
when
trucks
are
coming
in
to
drop
off
product.
F
F
F
F
F
H
B
A
E
H
A
H
Somebody
innocently
nudging
them
three
more
spots
down
the
aisle,
and
then
you
know
your
neighbor
saying:
hey
you're,
using
up
our
parking
spots.
I
I
just
I'm
just
wondering
why
why
that
is
and
the
concern
I
have
given
the
fact
that
this
kind
of
has
appeared
and
grown
over
time.
I
just
I'm
trying
to
make
sure
that
it
doesn't
continue
to
do
that.
F
H
That's
that's
and
that's
a
valid
one,
so
you
wouldn't
have
a
problem.
Putting
nice
permanent
orange
paint
where
these
jersey
barriers
are.
So
if
we
happen
to
come
by
and
notice
that
we
can
see
all
the
orange
paint
because
jersey
barrier
is
now
moving
down
towards
walmart
they're,
pretty
pretty
obvious
that
it
isn't
where
it's
supposed
to
be.
A
A
A
A
H
A
A
A
H
F
H
H
E
F
H
H
B
A
F
H
I
mean
I'll
just
comment
that
fire
lane
has
got
a
lot
of
different
meanings
to
different
people
and
different
agencies,
and
the
fire
department
locally
is
have
one
definition
of
fire
lane,
but
your
your
public
building
permit
also
has
another
and
there's
requirements
there
again.
We
have
no
say
on
this.
I'm
just
saying
this
is
a
friendly
piece
of
comment
that
at
some
point
you
know
someone
could
come
in
and
not
like
how
that's
up
you
need
to
think
about
the
widths,
whether
there's
storage
between
the
fire
lane
and
the
building.
A
F
I
I
So
the
project
cannot
be
approved
as
proposed.
There
are
some
issues
that
need
correcting,
including
non-compliant
frontline
for
storage,
lack
of
safe
pedestrian
access,
no
long-term
bicycle
storage
and
retro
facility,
and
the
building
hasn't
does
not
have
a
parallel.
So
steph's
recommending
the
drv
here
and
discuss
the
project
with
the
applicant.
I
Take
public
testimony
possibly
continue
the
hearing
to
allow
the
applicant
to
use
the
materials
alternately.
The
applicant
has
discussed
their
amenability
to
making
certain
changes.
So
you
know
one
another
alternative
would
be
to
have
that
discussion
and
if
you're
satisfied
that
the
changes
will
bring
the
project
into
compliance,
you
can
require
the
conditions
to
be
met
with
just
a
little
final
plans
and
staff
would
recommend
that
the
drv
review.
Those
final
plans.
I
Basically,
the
the
project
complies
as
proposed
with
the
dimensional
standards
of
the
lab
and
outdoors
outdoor
storage
is
shown
on
the
site
plan.
Outdoor
sales
are
committed
in
the
industrial
voting
district,
but
only
within
areas
designated
for
that
purpose
and
outdoor
storage
is
not
permitted
in
the
front
yard.
C
I
I
E
A
J
H
Okay,
I
think
it's
a
semantics
thing,
because
I
talked
to
melinda
twice
and
she
was
very
helpful
and
we
actually
provided
a
sketch
that
we'll
get
in
depth.
But
I
didn't
want
to
get
out
of
turn,
but
I
think
I
think
we're
going
to
have
a
discussion.
That's
going
to
be
pretty
positive
and
I
realize
there's
four
items
here,
but
I
think
you
know
we
got
a
pretty
good
answer
for
all
four.
H
So
I
think
it's
kind
of
semantics
thing,
because
I
think
it
is
we're
going
to
park
cars
there
to
sell
and
obviously
they're
going
to
put
the
nicest
ones
in
the
front,
the
ones
that
you
know
need
under
fixed
or
whatever
they're
going
to
be
towards
the
back
and
they're,
going
to
screw
them
into
the
bay
and
fix
them
and
put
them
back
out.
So
I
think
outdoor
sales
is
just
you
know,
put
outdoor
sales
and
I
think,
recovery.
H
As
far
as
the
landscaping
goes.
You
know
I
have
a
sketch
that
I'd
like
to
put
up
on
the
stream
and
we'll
talk
about
that.
But,
like
I
said
I
didn't
want
to
get
out
of
turn.
So
we
do
have
some
information
that
we'd
like
to
provide
to
the
board,
have
some
feedback
from
the
folks,
knowing
that
that's
possible.
So,
okay,
so
let
me
know
so
the
cars
that
so
follow
me
up
over
there
on
stage
all
the
cars
that
you
have
on
the
lot
are
they
to
be
sold
so.
H
H
Here
you
go,
you
go
to
an
auction
or
whatever
buy
a
car,
bring
it
in
park
it
there
until
you
get
to
fix
it
fix
it,
put
it
back
out
yeah
so,
in
other
words,
every
car
on
the
launch
for
sale
and
someone
actually
did
buy
one
before
you
actually
quote
repair
it.
If
they
offer
you
enough
money
right,
that's
my
perception.
H
A
I
I
I
There
is
being
proposed
a
single
point
of
access
and
from
a
safety
standpoint
it
will
reduce
the
non-conformity
that
currently
exists
on
the
site.
Pedestrian
access
does
not
defy
the
the
hack
review
of
this
project
and
their
comments.
No,
during
the
lack
of
pedestrian
access
and
recommended
the
applicant
provides
sidewalk
connecting
basically
between
the
parking
spaces
and
the
front
facade
connecting
the
parking
to
the
building
condition
has
been
drafted
to
that
effect.
I
I
There
is
no
mention
in
their
application
of
long-term
bicycle
parking
spaces
for
editor
facilities.
However,
conversations
with
the
applicants
have
indicated
that
that
they're
willing
to
provide
that
a
tradition
has
been
drafted
and
then,
let's
see
also,
there
is
noted,
a
need
to
show
stored,
snow
storage
on
the
final
plan
and
a
condition
to
get
drafted.
For
that
also,
the
hack
noted
there's
no
airlock.
Currently
an
airlock
needs
to
be
provided
at
the
main
entrance.
I
I
I
And
because
of
the
nature
of
the
site,
space
constraints
and
the
state
right-of-way,
the
staff
is
recommending
those
retreats
be
required.
They
are
proposing
shrubs
in
in
that
setback
area
along
with
stormwater
infrastructure,
outdoor
lighting
mostly
complies
the
applicant
does
need
to
provide
some
information
about
about
the
light
timing.
Outdoor
lighting,
including
side
lighting,
must
be
turned
off
30
minutes
after
close
of
business
and
then
turned
on
30
minutes
prior
to
the
opening
of
the
business,
and
the
condition
has
been
drafted
for
that,
and
I
have
some
draft.
I
J
A
F
H
H
There
shouldn't
in
my
mind
there
should
be
no
discussion
whatsoever.
I
mean
if
we
had
a
10,
you
know
rehabilitation
of
a
piece
of
property,
then
it
would
be
reasonable
to
assume
that
we
would
have
a
you
know
some
form
of
attributed
agreement
to
bring
the
conformity
or
non-conformity
into
balance.
Yeah,
that's
correct!
So
I'm
just
what's
your?
What
can
you
can
you
tell
me
what
your
thought.
I
Site
is
non-performing,
and
I
want
to
list
the
ways
that
it
was
not
important
so
that
you
are
aware
of
that
and
also
to
state
the
ways
in
which
it
was
being
brought
into
the
conformance
and
then
to
state
that
that
you
need
to
decide
whether
the
project
is.
You
know
whether
the
scale
or
project
wards
bringing
you
know
every
last,
basically
bringing
every
last
performance.
That's
just
stated
for
your
information,
so
it's
a
bit
subjective.
H
A
A
I
H
H
So
here's
the
existing
building,
obviously
the
entrance-
is
fixed.
It's
fixed
by
v
trains.
They
bought
the
rights.
We
can't
go
to
the
right
side.
This
line
is
fixed.
Obviously
that's
already.
The
storm
water
feature
is
parallel.
We're
creating
that
and
all
we're
doing
is
backing
up
the
lock.
This
line
is
sort
of
fixed.
It's
just
we're
just
backing
it
up.
Obviously,
this
building
configuration
is
not
by
mistake.
I
mean
it's
88
feet.
H
This
way,
64
feet
this
way,
we're
trying
to
be
as
conforming
as
we
can
by
putting
you
know
the
car
seat
back,
we
had
some
parking
spaces
in
the
35
feet.
You
guys
asked
us
to
take
them
out.
We
took
them
out
normal
parking,
16
spaces,
and
then
you
know
the
only
thing
that
was
really
a
point
of
intention
is:
how
do
you
get
people
from
here
to
there
and
we're
gonna
go
over
that
sketch,
as
we
think
we
move
forward?
That's
the
path
forward.
So
we'll
talk
about
that
so
number
one.
H
It
says
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
semantics
issue
non-compliant
front
yard
outdoor
storage.
I
think
it's
easily
handled
by
like
what
melinda
said
about
it's
outdoor
service
cars
are
going
to
come
in
we're
going
to
put
them
on
the
lot
and
they're
going
to
get
fixed
they're
going
to
get
put
back
out
there
for
sale.
So
I
think
it's
outdoor
settings.
The
reason
that
we
drew
that
sketch
today
is
to
clearly
show
that
we
don't
have
24
rows.
So
we'll
talk
about
that.
So
that's
number
one.
H
A
A
H
It
and
then
it's
for
sale.
My
understanding
and
she
may
be
better
student
to
answer
this
question.
But
let's
say
somebody
comes
in
and
you
know
the
bumpers
could
be
sold
as
it
is
and
for
a
reduced
price
or
they
can
put
a
bumper
on
it
and
put
it
back
out.
So
I
kind
of
see
that
it
could
be
for
sale
either
way.
But
if
it's
something
more
major,
obviously,
then
it
needs
to
go
in
and
it's
dependent
on
their
schedule
because
they're
not
fixing
any
anybody
else
as
far
as
different
zero.
H
A
And
and
our
job
at
the
drb
on
the
most
fundamental
level
is,
is
to
judge
projects
for
compliance
with
the
bylaws
yep.
Okay,
I'm
I'm
not
intended.
I'm
a
business
person,
I'm
not
intending
to
be
an
obstacle
here:
okay,
but
our
job.
Our
charter
is
to
judge
projects
for
compliance
with
rules
made
by
others,
and
the
rules
made
by
others
is
that
storage
is
not
allowed
there,
and
if
and
and
we
would
be
this
body
and
of
which
I'm
the
chair
would
be
negligent
in
our
responsibilities.
A
H
The
hardest
thing
is,
it
doesn't
really
say
you
know
what
that
statute
limitation
time
frame
would
be.
I
don't
think
I
mean
we
could
try
to
come
up
with
something,
but,
like
my
perception
from
the
turnover
that
anastasia
is
talking
to
me
about
it
sounds
like.
Are
we
talking
like
a
week
or
two?
It's
definitely
gonna
be
less
than
a
month.
Is
that
correct?
H
H
Later
we
wanted
it
to
be
super
attractive.
We're
gonna,
put
up
a
super
attractive
building
g4
come
up
with
a
really
smashing
design,
I
think
which,
as
soon
as
I
saw
the
building
I
was
just.
Did
you
see
that
green
building
now
and
it's
too
close
to
the
road,
and
so
a
lot
of
emphasis,
like
I
said,
was
put
on
kind
of
like
creating
this
line
and
keeping
the
cars
behind
it.
H
H
With
the
stormwater
feature
and
when
you
look
at
the
ortho
like,
if
you
can
zoom
out,
I
mean
we're:
not
I'm
not
here
to
knock
anybody
else,
but
earthy
cars
is
about.
As
far
as
like
right
on
the
street,
you
go
by
there
and
they're
dusty.
That's
like
that's
non-conforming,
so
there
they
are
right.
There.
G
J
The
cars
which
take
longer
time
to
repair
we
gonna
keep
our
shop
the
one
where
right
now
and
we're
not
giving
it
back
or
something
yeah
and
we
have
yeah
so
those
cars
at
this
lot
gonna
be
pretty
quick,
we're
not
planning
to
keep
them,
and
if
they
stay
longer,
he
usually
takes
them
to
the
auctions.
So
we
need
to
always
to
move
them
around.
So
they're
not
going
to
be
like
there
forever.
H
This
topic
I
mean
from
my
perspective,
you
know,
I
feel
that
the
fact
that
it's
labeled
storage
on
the
application
means
that's
how
you
were
looking
at
that
as
storage,
and
so
my
question
is,
is
if
you're
going
to
change
that
to
display
lot
or
sales
lot?
How
are
you
changing?
What
are
you
changing
to
be
able
to
to
kind
of
legitimize
changing
the
name
on
that
piece
of
paper?
H
H
Law
and
your
usb
cars
right
behind
it
they're
going
to
be
close
together
more
than
traditional
parts,
so
the
thought
was
we'll
call
it
a
storage
lot.
Maybe
that
board
won't
make
a
striker
and
I'm
like,
I
don't
think,
that's
a
big
deal
like
they're
there
to
sell
cars.
We
should
have
called
it
outdoor
sales
to
begin
so
I
apologize
that
we'd
sold
in
a
store
if
they're,
if
they're
parked
that
close
to
one
another.
How
can
anyone
go
in
there
to
to
evaluate
the
cars
and
decide
if
they
want
to
buy
them?
J
So
usually,
people
call
for
appointment
and
we
pull
out
the
car
and
they
just
come
to
see
it.
So
we
don't
have
like
a
huge
amount
of
people
coming
every
day
like
it's
non-stop
and
usually
it's
like
appointments
people
can
stop
by
during
the
day.
Yes,
we
just
go
and
take
up
the
car
and
park
it
in
the
front
and
we
can
open
it.
H
A
G
H
I
will
tell
you
that
the
last
thing
I
want
to
see-
I
I
I'm
in
theory
I'll,
tell
you
that
I'm
not
opposed
to
this,
and
I
think
that
it's
a
it's
redeveloping.
This
life
is
a
fantastic
idea
because,
what's
going
on
there
right
now
is
absolutely
horrible
and
it's
been
that
way
for
a
long
time.
So
that's
my
first
one,
so
I
think
I'm
I'm
all
for
it.
But
the
last
thing
I
want
to
see
is
a
line
full
of
dented
and
damaged.
J
H
Based
on
what
you
said
earlier,
that's
the
image
that
comes
to
mind
now.
I
understand
that
that
the
row
in
front
are,
you
know
or
two
maybe
are
the
cars
that
you
fixed
and
they're
repaired,
or
what
have
you
and
they're
they're
the
shiny,
new
shiny,
new
one,
but
you
also
said
the
dented
and
the
damaged
ones
are
parked
in
the
back
and
that's
what
you
know:
that's
what
I
don't
want.
You
have
a
beautiful
building.
I
like
I
like
the
design.
I
like
the
fact
that
setback
and
you're
improving
a
lot.
H
See
any
dents,
so
I
side
with
you
on
that
I
mean
I
don't
think
from
anesthesia.
This
is
high-end
stuff.
I
mean
these
people
are
going
to
move
the
car.
So
if
there's
a
little
bed
they're
going
to
bring
it
in
they're
going
to
fix
it
and
turn
around
and
it's
going
to
go,
I
don't
think
they're
going
to
have
like
a
car
that,
oh,
my
god,
this
thing's
falling
off.
I
don't
get
that
perception,
but
hopefully
you
don't
either.
H
H
So
I
know
that
you
focus
on
this
and
it's
going
to
be
very
similar.
It's
not!
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
possible
to
just
bring
up
that
sketch
that
I
sent
you
today-
and
I
know
you
haven't
seen
this,
but
it's
very,
very
similar
just
a
couple
little
things
that
I
want
to
just
go
over-
that
I'm
going
to
make
it
easier
to
visualize,
because
that's
if
that's
okay,
yeah,
so
the
exact
same
sketch.
All
I
did
is
throw
some
cards
on
there.
H
Okay-
and
this
is
the
lock
aisle
that
the
board
is
adding
that
we
need
and
we're
not
supposed
to
do
it.
There's
a
lot
of
emphasis
on
this
is
number
two
yeah
save
professional
access.
You're
gonna
come
in
this
is
shared
by
americas
by
the
way
so
we're
talking
about
you
know
the
lack
of
you
know
between
two
properties.
H
H
H
Pedestrian
access
we're
going
to
do
this
walkable
aisle
right
here
and
talk
to
melinda
about
it
and
that's
the
emphasis
to
get
to
the
portfolio.
So
that's
number
two:
is
there
any
questions
on
that?
How
does
this
pretty
straight?
Is
any
difference
in
material
or
is
it
just?
Do
you
have
a
payment
because
of
plowing
and
just
ease
of
you
know
access
because
we
get
so
many
doors.
We've
got
doors
here,
door
here
door
here
and
then
you
know
the
bait
doors
here.
H
So
for
plowing
and
stuff,
like
that,
when
you
talk
to
hacc
the
committee,
they
kind
of
understood
the
24
foot
aisle
I
mean
we
want
to
just
you
know,
be
able
to
file
it
maintain
it.
So
we
really
don't
have
them
to
put
anything
like
if
we
put
concrete
here,
it's
just
going
to
get.
You
know
really
beat
up
by
the
flap,
because
we
got
to
plow
right
up,
so
we're
going
to
take
the
snow
removal
out
and
then
we're
going
to
pave
it
and
make
a
5
to
get
from.
A
H
H
H
H
C
H
H
But
in
your
code
it
says
shove
an
airlock
talking,
anastasia
the
point
of
contention
is
they
want
to
bring
the
cars
inside
the
building
as
well,
so
that
airlock's
just
going
to
take
up
more
space
that
we're
pretty
small
already
at
60
40.
But
again,
if
you've
got
questions
during
the
masculine
anastasia.
A
C
H
G
C
H
I
guess
our
job
is
to
know
what
the
williston
bylaws
does
about
airlocks,
because
I'm
not
gonna,
I'm
not.
I
don't
have
the
building
clothes
memorized
right
now
and
I
would
have
to
go
look
it
up,
but
I
think
there
are
there's
always
various
interpretation
and
you
may
be
correct,
but
generally
you
do
more
than
just
the
area
that
you
first
walk
into.
Is
you?
Don't
you
don't
you
don't
size
the
airlock
on
the
single
space?
You
know
it's
just
the
lobby
of
the
building,
it's
the
entire
hotel
or
it's
the
entire
target.
H
So
I'm
not
sure
how
this
works
with
the
garage
and
that
may
be
if
it's
semi-conditioned
space,
maybe
that
doesn't
matter
but
I'm
guessing.
This
is
condition
space
yes
condition
space,
but
the
back
is
as
well.
It's
raj,
yes,
yeah,
but
but
again
I
think
it's
a
moot
point
because
really
we're
not
enforcing
the
building
code,
we're
enforcing
the
wilson
development
bylaw.
So.
I
H
H
H
G
A
H
I'd
like
to
ask
one
favorite
question:
you
could
bring
that
sketch
that
I
sent
melinda
one
more
time,
because
this
is
really
a
lot
of
discussion
about
what
it's
called
so
they're,
always
17
there
and
we're
less
than
24.
So
we
don't
feel
like
we
should
have
to
put
in
landscaping
and
islands
because
it
doesn't
mean
there
are
regulations
to
require
it,
because
we
don't
have
a
role
of
24..
H
So
unless
melinda
I
mean
melinda
was
super
helpful,
she
explained
it
super
well.
She
spent
some
time
with
us
on
the
phone
and
that's
the
reason
why
we
wanted
to
show
you
this
sketch
of
what
it
might
look
like.
This
is
just
a
lightness
only,
but
it's
just
for
the
purposes
of
not
having
much
space
after
we
do
all
this
work.
They
put
up
this
shiny
new
building.
H
I
guess
we'd
like
a
little
bit
of
reprieve
about
you,
know
putting
cars
on
the
side
and
maintaining
that
24
foot
aisle
and
recognizing
that
that
storm
water
feature
is
going
to
create
a
buffer
to
route
2
that
you
don't
have,
and
it's
very
clear
on
the
ortho
that
other
cars
are
parked.
Like
right
edge
of
pavement
and
we're
actually
going
to
delineate
our
entryway,
so
it's
not
a
free-for-all.
That
seems
to
be
a
huge
non-performing.
I
mean
when
I
went
to
the
property
today.
H
H
I
think
it's
super
important
for
the
board
to
recognize
how
much
space
we're
going
to
create
between
that
sidewalk,
because
that
is
the
sidewalk
that
nutrients
is
going
to
put
in
as
well
for
pedestrians,
like
that's
part
of
their
plan
and
their
right
away,
and
we're
going
to
be
putting
our
stormwater
feature
behind
that.
So
you
know,
I
think
you've
got
an
opportunity
to
bring
this
site
into
compliance
and-
and
you
can
end
up
with
a
hell
of
a
project
yeah.
H
H
Gateway
to
williston,
you
know
you
all
just
went
in
there's
some
people
like
it,
some
people,
don't
it
cleaned
up
it
cleaned
up,
something
that
was,
you
know,
been
sitting
there
for
a
long
time.
I
think
it
looks
great.
I
think
they
did
it.
I
think
they've
done
a
nice
job.
You
know
you're
sitting
right
next
door,
great-looking
building,
I
you
know
you're
going
to
be
you're
going
to
be
the
first
thing
that
people
see
coming
into
wilson.
So
I
would.
A
So
I
I
echo
that,
and
and
we
we
will
get
there
working
together,
what
we're
what
we're
going
to
do
is
is,
as
a
as
a
board
we're
going
to
be
providing
melinda
with
some
feedback
later,
and
you
can
call
her
tomorrow
to
get
some
specific
guidance.
I
I
don't
I
don't.
This
is
a
body
of
multiple
people.
I
don't
speak
for
the
board,
I'm
I'm
kind
of
a
master
of
ceremonies.
H
H
Are
we,
okay
with
the
sort
of
level
of
out
or
sales,
looking
sort
of
like
that,
because
moving
the
building
around,
I
don't
see
it
helping
in
any
way.
So
like
that's,
that's
that's
that's
the
hardest
thing
for
me
to
try
to
figure
out
is
we're
creating
sort
of
a
rectangular
building
towards
the
front,
but
trying
to
put
cars
as
best
we
can
to
the
side.
We
would
love
to
have
more
space.
H
You
know
away
from
wilson
road,
but
it's
not
possible
because
the
environmental
restrictions
so
like
I
said
I
mean
I'd
love
to
put
the
cars
so
that
you
know
they're
further
back.
We
just
because
we
cannot
so
we're
asking
for
help
that
whatever
feedback
hasn't
revealed,
you
guys
have
decided
to
do
it
through
melinda.
If
there's
not
much
changes
you're
asking
me
when
we
can
continue
it,
I
mean,
if
we're
close
at
you
know,
with
a
walking
aisle
and
putting
the
ada
spa
and
calling
it
outdoor
sales.
H
I
guess
my
question
would
be
like
we
could
grayscale
the
cars
and
show
light
colored
cars
if
that's
helpful,
but
just
give
us
enough
feedback
so
because
I
don't
feel
like
there's
a
lot
of
changes
that
we
can
make
so
you're
asking
me
like.
How
long
is
it
gonna
take?
Well,
it
depends
what
you're
asking
us
to
leave
like.
I
feel,
if
we're
close,
won't
take
long
at
all
and
that's
what
I'm
hoping
for.
A
C
A
H
E
J
C
J
This
part
we
plan
to
expand
retail,
so
the
cars
that
are
gonna
come
to
this
new
shop.
They
move
the
electricity
already
because
he
already
he
buys
with
my
husband,
so
he
buys
the
faster
that
option,
which
is
retail
ready,
which
needs
just
breaks
just
bumper
or
something
like
that
and
he
decides
like.
Does
it
worth
it?
So
if
it's
a
long
project,
we
have
different
shops
to
repair
them.
We
don't
have
like
a
lot
of
full
time
again.
We
have
only
one
and
we
use
outdoor
shops
to
repair
like
those
big
big
projects.
G
H
Like
you
said
something
about,
you
said
something
about
like
you,
don't
want
to
send
somebody
out
to
try
to
enforce
it.
I
mean
if
they
count.
Let's
say
they
got
30
cars
and
it's
like
oh
there's,
two
or
there's
four
I
mean
like
nobody
wants
to
be
chasing
that.
That
close,
I
mean
it'd
have
to
be
like
a
clearing
problem,
so
I
guess
I
want
to
emphasize
that
because,
like
if
you
impose
this
restriction,
like
you
you're
going
to.
H
Walk
out
there
and
I
look
and
I
go
more
than
50
percent
of
these
cars
are
literally
jumpers
right
and,
if
I
can
do
that,
but
I
don't
even
have
to
make
accounting
there's
too
many
right.
I
think
it's
been
emphasized
tonight
too
by
anastasia.
So
it's
kind
of
sad,
it's
basically
a
common
sense.
They
want
to
use
this.
They
want
to
use
this
law
for
the
highest
yeah.
I
think
it's
it's
been
pretty
clear,
but
that.
D
H
H
Oh,
that's:
that's
the
view
for
a
long
one
on
the
first
sheet,
you
know,
because
when
we
got
approved
by
v-trans,
if
you
look
at
the
overall
sheet,
there's
there's
a
there's,
a
viewport
on
the
side,
and
that
takes
the
notes
because
vtrans
wanted
to
see
just
what
it
looked
like
now,
and
their
plan
overlaid
off
to
the
side
on
top
of
it.
So
in
your
packet
like
if
you
looked
at
sheets
six
and
seven,
it's
got
the
lines
of
what
it's
going
to
look
like,
because
you
guys
asked
for
that
at
preach.
H
H
They're
saying
that
it
looks
like
one
of
your,
your
drainage
wells
is
like
half
and
half
for
now
for
one
actually,
I
should
have
been
turned
off
on
that
sketch.
That's
my
fault,
okay,
that's
why
I
was
just
kind
of
saying
you're
to
do
some
work
in
that
next
thing.
You
know
the
city
the
state's
going
to
come
along
and
say
yeah
we
decided
we
want
that
extra
extra
acreage,
no
okay,
good
question,
though
I
can
see
why
that's
confusing
okay!
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
everyone.
A
C
K
D
A
For
an
item
b,
which
is
the
east
elevation,
provide
a
facade
treatment
on
the
east
side
under
the
gable
that
is
similar
to
the
west
entrance
facade
using
the
same
pallet
of
materials
as
on
the
west
elevation
and
I'll
I'll
start.
This
discussion
off
by
saying
what
I
envisioned
was
was
basically
a
similar
design
on
the
east
elevation
that
mirrored
that
jet
out
on
the
west
elevation.
A
So
there
would
be
that
same
vertical
stone,
the
same
color
scheme
and
other
material
scheme,
and
it
would
basically
be
understanding
that
the
the
gables
are
a
little
different
on
both
elevations,
to
the
extent
that
there
would
be
some
latitude
due
to
the
gable
differences
on
each
elevation.
I
was
looking
for
the
same
materials
on
each
side,
and
this
is
not
what
I
personally
see
so
it
doesn't.
It
doesn't
meet
what
I
was
hoping
to
see,
but
I'm
one
voice
on
this
fight.
H
H
A
So
so
let
me
let
me
restate
the
question
okay,
because,
because
I
I
think
you're
I
think
you're
missing.
My
point
is
the
west
elevation
we
approved
and
we
said
we
said,
make
the
east
facade
treatment
on
the
east
side
under
the
gable
similar
to
the
west
entrance
facade
using
the
same
pallet
of
materials
on
the
west.
G
B
K
So
we
would
be
running
into
trouble
dealing
with
the
with
the
p-tac
units
etc
on
that
side,
and
we
probably
have
to
trim
it
out
much
more
and
end
up
with
a
lot
of
like
flashing
details
and
stuff.
That
would
probably
not
look
as
clean
as
trying
to
keep
the
materials
co-planar
and
just
changing
the
color
to
match
what
we
had
previously
and
also
tying
into
the
new
material.
That's
on
the
front,
so
we
just
try
to
keep
it
simple.
H
K
If
you
go
back
to,
if
you
go
back
a
few
iterations
this,
this
exact
thing
was
basically
approved
and
then
we
changed
materials
because
of
the
franchise
and
also
because
of
lack
of
you
know,
supply
chain.
So
we
went
with
some
other
things
and
then
we
were
directed
to
go
back
in
this
direction.
It
seemed.
H
H
I
I
didn't
we
did
not
direct
you
to
go
back
to
this
direction
and
we
didn't
direct
paint.
You
you,
as
I
understand
it.
There
was
an
application
put
in
front
of
us.
We
approved
it
with
the
certain
conditions
and-
and
the
question
on
mr
chairman,
I
believe,
is
whether
what
we're
seeing
submitted
for
final
plans
is
consistent
with
what
was
approved,
and
I
my
answer
that
question
is
no.
A
K
H
H
K
Right
but
the
fact
that
it's
visible,
it
doesn't
mean
it's
you
proposed
I
like
that.
I
mean
I
I
don't
know
it's
just
I
I
it's
visible,
but
I
don't
think
like
we're
treating
it
like
a
back.
I
think
it.
I
think
it's
like
what
we
had
before
supply
shortages,
and
that
was
and
that
the
only
real
change
is
because
of
the
supply
shortage.
And
then
you
know
we
did
a
few
iterations
since
then,
and
it
seemed
like
we
wanted
to
go
back
to
what
we
had.
H
D
A
Please
refrain
from
interrupting
drb
members
when
they're
speaking
for
an
effective
communication.
It
needs
to
be
linear,
one
person
speaks
parties,
listen
and
then
we
give
an
opportunity
for
a
rebuttal,
and
talking
over
people
is
is,
is
something
that
I
really
struggle
with,
and
you
seem
to
be
very
skilled
with
that.
A
So
what
we're?
What
we're?
What
we're
saying
to
you,
if
you
would
listen,
is
that
what
was
approved
back
originally
has
no
bearing
today,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
you
came
in
and
you
asked
for
approval
of
new
elevations
and
new
materials,
and
we
provided
feedback
that
we
wanted
the
east
and
west
elevations
to
look
similar.
You
came
back
with
a
plan
that
doesn't
accomplish
that.
A
We
just
had
an
informal
pool
here
and
three
people,
myself
included,
agreed
that
you
didn't
beat
the
intent
of
the
drp's
direction
and,
and
you
can
argue
about
the
original
design,
you
can
go
back
to
the
original
design
if
you
that
was
approved,
if
you
care
to,
but
if
you
want
to
amend
the
west
elevation,
then
our
guidance
to
you
and
our
mandate
to
you
is
you:
make
the
east
elevation?
The
same
and
and
we'll
we'll
we'll
formalize
this
in
a
in
a
in
a
finding.
A
D
D
But
since
we're
all
here
today,
I'd
just
like
to
ask
for
some
feedback,
since
we
have
a
single
gable
versus
a
triple
gable.
I
agree
with
what
mark
said
earlier.
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
bring
the
stone
all
the
way
up,
because
you
kind
of
have
that
slanted
portion.
You
don't
have
that
flat
section
like
you
do
in
the
in
the
front
on
the
west
elevation,
so
I'm
just
asking
for
some,
maybe
some
feedback
on
what
what
the
drb
is
thinking
in
terms
of
the
stone
and
where
we
should
stop
it.
H
I
could,
but
again
tonight
I'm
a
drb
member,
and
I
really
don't
want
to
design
these
things.
I
can
tell
you
that
you
know
the
vertical
elements
on
the
sides
of
that
building
on
the
west
elevation
are
attractive
and
that
the
the
the
scattered
colors
of
the
east
elevation
that
that
kind
of
are
just
paint
by
numbered
on
are
are
odd
and
they're
uncomfortable
and
that
you've
got
four
different
colors
meeting
in
one
spot
on
that
building,
and
it
does
nothing
to
accentuate
the
fact
that
there
is
a
gateway
in
there.
H
So
the
thought
was
in
my
mind
that
if
you've
got
a
variety
of
materials
and
you've
got
some
more
vertical
elements
at
the
edges,
that
was
a
tremendous
improvement
and
and
something
that's
actually
quite
nice
on
the
on
the
west
elevation,
and
we
were
hoping
that
we
could
see
something
more
like
that,
given
the
fact
that
we're
going
to
be
approaching
the
east
elevation
in
a
very
similar
fashion
as
the
west.
Now,
of
course,
you
don't
want
a
canopy
on
there,
because
it's
not
an
entrance,
and
that
would
be
disingenuous.
H
D
I
I
believe
what
was
originally
sorry.
This
is
dave
speaking
I
was.
What
I
wanted
to
say
is
what
was
originally
approved.
There
was
was
also
cement
board.
It's
just
going
to
be
a
different
color,
but
this
is
referring
to
the
2019
approval,
since
we
haven't
gotten
any
approval
on
the
on
the
east
side.
D
A
But
I
think
you
I
think,
we've
made
our
point
pretty
clear
that
that
we
want
the
the
a
very
similar
look
on
that
that
gable
jet
out
on
both
the
east
and
the
west
elevation
and
and
if
we,
if
we,
the
drp,
caused
some
confusion
by
using
the
word
palette.
Then
then
I'll
I'll
take
personal
responsibility
for
that.
But
you've
you
know,
but
you've
heard
what
we're
what
we're
looking
for.