►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Public Hearing - 7/15/19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
2019
1800
authorizing
the
city
solicitor
to
petition
the
orphans,
Court
Division,
to
request
a
transfer
of
a
portion
of
Enwright
parklet
to
Penn
Lee,
Park
South
Inc
in
exchange
for
an
abutting
parcel
of
land.
This
petition
was
found
to
be
valid
and
in
accordance
with
the
Home
Rule.
That
concludes
the
reading
of
the
legislation
up
for
discussion
by
City
Council.
Thank
you
and
have
a
wonderful
day.
B
Okay
good
evening,
everyone
and
welcome
to
this
cable
cast
public
hearing
of
Pittsburgh
City
Council
for
today,
Monday
July,
the
15th
2019
I'm,
councilman
Krause
I'll
be
chairing
this
evening's
public
hearing
and
we
are
joined
here
by
councilmember,
Ricky
Burgess
and
we
may
have
other
members
joining
us
shortly.
But
for
the
time
being,
we'll
begin
by
reading
the
purpose
of
the
bills
as
to
why
we're
assembled
for
this
public
hearing.
And
so
madam
clerk,
would
you
please
read
the
purpose
of
Bill's,
1800
and
1834
bill.
C
As
the
court
or
the
city
authorized
in
or
direct
bill.
Number
1834
is
a
petition
from
the
residents
of
the
city
requesting
a
public
hearing
before
city
council
relative
to
propose
legislation.
2019
1800
authorizing
the
city
solicitor
to
petition
the
orphans,
Court
Division,
to
request
a
transfer
of
a
portion
of
enright
parklet
to
Penn
Lee
Park
South
Inc
in
exchange
for
an
abutting
parcel
of
land.
Okay,.
B
B
We,
the
green
light
will
indicate
the
start
of
your
3
minutes
when
the
yellow
light
comes
on.
You'll
have
one
minute
to
summarize
your
thoughts
and
when
the
red
light
comes
on,
your
time
will
have
expired,
so
we
will
go
with
our
first
registered
speaker,
which
is
mr.
Arthur
Allen.
Mr.
Allen
welcome
welcome
oh.
B
B
B
D
I'd
like
to
begin
with
a
statement,
communities
are
built
one
home
at
a
time
with
that
in
mind.
Lg
Realty
wants
to
build
retail
office
space
and
a
parking
garage
where
Penn
Plaza
Apartments
once
stood
I'd
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
state
of
places
to
live
and
ground-floor
retail
in
East
Liberty
and
the
greater
East
Liberty
area.
There's
the
bomb
house
which
opened
in
2015
at
South,
Graham
and
Baum
Boulevard.
D
They
still
have
no
ground-floor
retail
tenants,
they're
still
looking
for
people
to
live
in
that
building
getting
closer
both
coda
on
center
and
the
walnut
on
Highland
buildings
still
have
apartments
available
for
rent
getting
closer
to
the
area.
We're
discussing
the
building
which
houses
duolingo
has
an
entire
first
floor.
Looking
for
a
retail
tenant,
getting
adjacent
to
the
Penn
Plaza,
the
former
Penn
Plaza
site,
you
have
East
Liberty,
Place,
north
and
East
Liberty
Place
south.
D
Behind
East
Liberty
Place
south
the
city
has
a
parking
lot,
which
I
drove
by
a
two
o'clock
this
afternoon
and
noticed
half
of
it
was
full.
So
what
I
would
like
to
point
out
is
we're
looking
at
a
lot
of
open
spots
for
ground-floor
retail
I
know
that
the
gum
Berg's
are
not
planning
on
having
living
spaces
any
longer
in
their
development,
but
there's
plenty
of
places
that
offer
market
rate
housing
and
there's
plenty
of
parking.
There's
multiple
Lots,
the
one
adjacent
to
the
triple-a
building
where
that
Lots
empty
most
of
the
day
anyways.
D
The
thing
that
I
guess
I
will
wrap
up
with
is
partly
occupied
buildings.
Empty
parking
lots.
They
do
not
create
a
vibrant
neighborhood.
People
are
what
create
a
community.
The
idea
of
taking
and
right
Park,
which
has
been
described
incorrectly
as
a
facility
that
has
not
been
maintained
properly,
which
is
completely
false.
The
city
has
been
in
the
last
two
weeks,
painting
all
the
park
benches
they're,
cutting
the
grass
regularly.
D
B
B
F
E
E
I'm
sure
everyone
is
aware
of
the
fact
that
this
regards
the
redevelopment
of
the
Penn
Plaza
site
and
land
transfers
that
will
reconfigure
Enwright
Park.
In
order
to
get
to
the
point
where
we
are,
there
was
mediation
between
the
developer,
the
gun,
Berg's,
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
several
neighborhood
groups
and
individuals,
the
consent
order
that
was
crafted
involved,
much
compromise
and
much
careful
planning.
E
The
the
major
point
that
the
neighbors
and
neighborhood
groups
that
intervened
in
this
matter
previously
are
concerned
about
here
is
the
ownership
of
new
IBAs
Street.
There
will
be
a
new
Street
created
running
from
negli
to
Euclid.
It
will
form
the
South
border
of
the
commercial
development
and
the
north
border
of
the
park
that
is
proposed
under
the
legislation
before
you
to
be
privately
owned.
That's
something
that
was
not
a
subject
of
mediation.
It
was
something
that
the
community
intervenors
frankly
thought.
A
new
Street
connecting
two
major
streets
was
going
to
be
a
public
street.
E
We
have
serious
concerns
regarding
whether
a
private
street
serving
a
public
park
is
going
to
provide
adequate
unfettered
access
for
all
park
users
now
and
in
the
future.
As
you
know,
the
test
that
the
city
has
to
pass
is
one
of
public
trust.
When
a
park
is
reconfigured,
the
new
park
must
be
as
good
or
better
than
the
existing
Park.
We
think
that
major
access
to
a
reconfigured
public
park
on
a
private
street
is
a
recipe
for
problems
is
a
recipe
for
private
guards
arbitrarily
stopping
and
and
restricting
access
to
this
public
facility.
E
We
urge
you
to
reconsider
this.
Another
item
is
that
the
bill
refers
to
a
clarification
of
the
consent
agreement
reached
on
may
29th
of
this
year.
The
first
we
ever
heard
of
it
was
in
the
legislation.
We
think
that
there
is.
This
is
a
fundamental
problem
with
with
this
legislation
that
this
was
not
properly
and
legally
added
to
the
consent
agreement,
without
our
knowledge
or
consent,
the
entire
legislation
package
fails.
We
believe,
please
take
these
concerns
seriously.
All.
E
G
Brown
I
live
in
East
Liberty
area
I
just
wanted
to
I'm
gonna
read
something
that
I
wrote
up
and
I'm
just
outrageous
that
this
legislation
proposed
that
the
solicitor
will
be
used
to
advocate,
on
behalf
of
the
gum
birds
to
take
away
and
privatize
private
land.
Councilman
Burgess,
who
sponsored
this
legislation,
has
no
shame
in
proposing
to
use
city
resources
such
as
the
city
solicitor,
to
help
fight
alongside
the
gun
Birds
to
obtain
land
that
belongs
to
the
public.
G
The
gun
burns
who
owned
pen
leaves
south
property,
has
displaced
100
residents
from
their
hunt
from
their
housing.
But
that
was
that's.
That's
not
enough.
Now
these
greedy
developers
want
to
restrict
knife,
Council
District
residents
from
enjoyment
of
park
and
walk
on
public
streets.
This
is
disgrace
that
councilman
Burgess
continues
his
corruption
and
selling
out
the
night
council
district
by
privatizing,
our
parks
and
our
streets.
I'm,
asking
I'm
asking
other
council
council
members
to
vote
against
the
city
solicitor
intervening
and
filing
this
petition
to
an
orphans
Court
on
behalf
of
Finley
South
Thank,
You,
Carmen,.
H
Hi,
my
name
is
Sally
inclues
and
I
live
at
two
to
seven
South
st.
Clair
in
East,
Liberty,
less
than
a
block
from
the
park
I've
been
about
a
16
year
resident
of
the
neighborhood
I'm,
also
one
of
the
cofounders
of
the
Enright
Park
Neighborhood
Association
I'm.
Sorry,
I
and
I've
been
one
of
the
active
intervenors
in
regarding
the
redevelopment
today
I'm
here
to
encourage
City
Council
in
the
mayor's
office
to
resolve
key
issues
pertaining
to
the
proposed
park
reconfiguration
prior
to
bringing
this
petition
to
orphans.
H
Court
I
agree
that
the
proposed
reconfiguration
will
provide
a
substantial
buffer
between
the
new
development
and
the
adjacent
neighborhood
and
that
the
new
connections
to
the
park
we'll
both
be
of
great
benefit
to
the
community.
Overall,
however,
my
two
key
points
are.
First,
it
is
critical
to
the
neighborhood
into
the
city's
interest
that
the
new
Eva
Street
be
publicly
owned
and
not
be
a
privately
owned
street
with
a
public
easement.
H
A
publicly
owned
street
will
provide
permanent
public
access
to
the
park,
the
adjacent
neighborhood
and
will
serve
to
break
down
the
super
block
that
was
imposed
on
the
community
via
the
60s
redevelopment.
That
resulted
from
the
consolidation
of
the
small
scale
Lots
in
public
streets
and
also
resulted
in
Penn
Plaza.
H
While
the
developer
has
stated
that
private
ownership
is
required
for
their
stormwater
infrastructure,
there
are
several
examples
of
streets
that
were
constructed
by
private
entities
with
integrated
stormwater
containment
systems
below
then
becoming
publicly
owned,
with
easements
for
maintenance
among
these
are
bakery
square
just
across
the
neighborhood.
The
second
key,
which
is
noted
in
the
consent
order,
is
that
the
community
intervenors
of
which
I
am
one
agreed
to
the
reconfigured
park.
If
and
only
if,
an
east-end,
affordable
housing
fund
were
established
to
help
bridge
the
gap
for
financing
mixed
income
housing.
H
What
would
provide
well
over
200
units
of
affordable
subsidized
and
moderate
income
units
in
East,
Liberty,
Garfield
and
Larimer,
and
that
these
units
be
completed
concurrent
with
LG
real
T's
new
development?
To
date,
the
housing
fund
has
not
been
established
and
we
have
received
no
updates
from
the
city
regarding
the
timeline
or
progress
to
those
goals.
The
consent
order
clearly
states
under
item
4.
The
city
shall
consider
legislation
authorizing
the
land
swaps,
which
we
are
considering
the
vacation
of
the
speed.
B
B
F
Afternoon,
Jennifer
Haven
I
live
at
2:05
South
Pacific
Avenue,
Pittsburgh
152
to
4
I
went
to
make
sure
I
am
an
employee
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
but
I'm
here
on
my
own
behalf
this
evening
this
evening,
I
asked
counsel
to
hold
this
legislation
pending
clarification
and
further
action
from
the
city
solicitor's
office.
More
specifically
petitioners,
although
they
were
promised
by
the
clerk's
office
that
we
would
have
at
least
10
days.
F
Notice
of
this
hearing
only
receive
notice
of
the
public
hearing
on
Friday
3
days
prior
to
this
hearing
in
the
mail
that
did
not
give
us
very
much
time
to
review
the
legislation
with
regards
to
the
legislation.
It
refers
to
exhibits
a
b
c
d,
e,
f
and
g.
These
exhibits
are
not
posted
on
the
city's
website.
They're
not
attached
to
the
legislation
they
haven't
been
given
to
council
members.
I
asked
my
council
member.
She
does
not
have
access
to
those
exhibits.
F
I
don't
understand
how
the
public
can
review
legislation,
especially
prior
to
a
public
hearing
and
how
City
Council
members
can
be
asked
to
vote
on
something
when
you
haven't
seen
the
legislation
with
exhibits,
paragraph
4
of
the
consent
order
that
people
were
referring
earlier
and
I
was
a
party
to
that
consent.
Order
between
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
penally,
Park
south
for
different
community
groups
in
sever,
several
private
individuals.
F
It
requires
the
city
to
consider
legislation
authorizing
the
land,
swap
at
the
same
time
as
the
city
vacate,
Spence,
circle,
speed,
Lane
and
they
expand
the
Trib
map
to
three-quarters
of
a
mile
from
the
site
so
that
we
have
access
to
affordable
housing
throughout
Garfield
friendship
beyond
East
Liberty
as
well
as
Larimer.
This
has
not
been
accomplished
to
the
contrary.
At
a
meeting
with
the
URA
in
the
planning
director
gaston
on
may
30th,
the
intervenors
were
advised
that
the
expansion
was
not
possible.
F
F
Finally,
I
don't
believe
this
land
swap
meets
the
requirements
of
the
donated
and
dedicated
land
Act
of
1959
or
the
Supreme
Court
case
petition
of
the
borough
of
Donington
decided,
June,
20th
2017.
The
city
must
show
that
the
parkland
er
parkland
is
no
longer
practicable
or
possible,
and
the
parkland
has
ceased
to
serve
the
public
interest
I.
Don't
think
that
either
of
those
have
been
proven
and
I
urge
you
please
to
read
both
the
dtpa
of
1959
and
the
Supreme
Court
case
before
you
make
a
decision
on
this
legislation.
Thank
you.
So
much
Thank.
I
Thank
you.
My
name
is
angelique
bamberg
and
I
live
with
my
family
at
233,
amber
Street,
a
half
a
block
away
from
Enright
Park
and
I've
lived
there
since
2001.
So
a
longtime
resident
of
the
neighborhood
I
want
to
say
that
I
am
in
favor
of
an
excellent
development
on
the
Pendley
Plaza
site
and
I'm
in
favor
of
an
excellent
Park
as
a
daily
user
of
that
Park
with
my
family
and
I'd
like
to
briefly
just
make
three
points,
some
of
which
will
reiterate
what
has
gone
before.
First.
I
Is
that
in
order
for
both
of
these
goals
to
be
accomplished,
an
excellent
development
and
an
excellent
park,
as
well
as
an
excellent
neighborhood
which
I
believe
we
have,
it
is
imperative
that
Eva
Street
remain
a
public
street.
Our
neighborhood
is
a
funny
little
neighborhood,
it's
kind
of
hemmed
in.
We
have
access
limited
access
to
the
main
thoroughfares
of
negly
Avenue
and
Friendship
Avenue
Eva
Street
is
our
other
access
with
that
being
a
privately
controlled
Street.
I
That
would
limit
our
ability
to
get
in
and
out
of
our
neighborhood
at
certain
times
and
in
ways
that
we
can't
right
now
predict
and
that's
not
something
that
as
a
neighborhood,
we
can
support
as
part
of
the
land
transfer
that
is
related
to
the
park.
Also,
with
the
park
itself
remaining
publicly
owned
property
a
publicly
owned
asset,
we
believe
it
is
imperative
that
the
park
remain
accessible
via
a
public
right-of-way.
So
I
also
would
only
support
this
legislation
going
forward
if
it
stipulates
that
IVA
Street
remain
a
publicly
owned.
Street.
I
Second
I'd
like
to
join
mr.
Allen,
who
spoke
before
in
rebutting
the
city's
finding
that
Enright
Park
is
a
poorly
maintained
park
and
a
poorly
used
park,
and
that
it
contributes
problems
such
as
light
pollution
to
our
neighborhood
again
having
lived
near
Enright
Park
for
18
years,
I
have
not
found
that
to
be
the
case.
This
park
is
regularly
maintained
by
the
city.
Certainly
we
would
be
in
favor
of
the
play
equipment
being
on
a
schedule
for
replacement,
but
that's
a
common
issue
to
parks.
Throughout
the
city
the
park
has
maintained.
I
I
B
J
B
So
we
have
exhausted
our
list
of
registered
speakers,
and
so,
as
is
our
tradition,
if
there
are
people
here
that
would
like
to
register
comment
before
the
council,
you
may
approach
the
podium.
We
will
give
you
one
minute
to
put
your
comment
on
the
public
record.
If
you
wish
to
do
so,
I
get
asked
if
you'd,
please
begin
by
giving
your
name
in
the
neighborhood
in
which
you
reside
Thanks
hi.
K
It's
worrisome
that
there
doesn't
seem
to
be
following
the
law
and
how
this
whole
deal
was
made,
and
now
that
we're
taking
something
that
was
public
and
making
it
private,
but
also
I'm,
just
hearing
things
that
aren't
true,
like
I've,
been
in
the
park
three
times
in
the
past
month,
I
just
had
a
barbecue
there
with
a
lot
of
people.
It's
an
one
of
the
nicer
parks
in
the
area
that
I
know
that's
within
walking
distance.
One
of
my
friends
plays
basketball
there.
K
All
the
time
I
heard
one
of
the
two
basketball
courts
is
going
to
be
affected
by
this
and,
like
there's,
also
I've,
seen
kids
on
the
playground.
It's
not
the
busiest
playground,
but
like
people
use
it,
you
know,
and
it's
already
kind
of
hard
to
get
to
being
only
on
these
two
side
streets,
where
you
kind
of
have
to
find
like
a
way
into
the
park.
That's
not
Anita
the
obvious.
If
you
make
that
street
private,
it's
just
going
to
be
worse
and
the
people
in
the
neighborhood
will
remember
what
happened
to
this.
K
L
Hi
Richard
sports
I
reside
at
five
four.
Oh
seven
quarrel,
Street
one
five,
two,
oh
six,
just
a
thought
to
reiterate.
What's
been
said
before,
but
really
ask
for
some
leadership,
perhaps
from
Council
and
from
the
mayor's
office
in
bringing
the
different
parties
together,
community
interests,
the
developers
city
officials
to
really
work
through
some
of
the
complexity.
That's
attached
to
this
legislation
and
into
what
has
to
happen
to
make
this
project
successful.
We've
had
a
history
of
sitting
down
with
the
developers
and
going
through
some
very
difficult
processes
to
get
things
done.
L
I
think
the
community
is
more
than
happy
to
do
that,
but
we're
going
to
need
to
do
it
quickly.
In
fairness
to
them.
They
have
a
timetable
that
they're
working
on.
We
want
it
that
we
want
to
bring
maybe
a
city
solicitor,
City
Council
the
mayor's
office,
possibly
the
Department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
together
with
community
interests
and
see.
If
we
can
get
this
legislation.
H
B
M
There,
my
name
is
Quinn
Kubelik
I
live
at
500
Tripoli
Street
in
the
Northside,
so
councilmember
Harris
I
have
voted
for
you
in
this
past.
Election
I
live
in
your
district
for
for
the
reason
alone
that
this
would
public.
This
would
privatize
publicly-held
land
that
that's
reason
enough
to
vote
against
this
and
as
I
understand
it.
Since
this
is
a
public
park,
you
need
to
demonstrate
that
it's
in
the
public
interest
before
giving
it
to
private
developers
and
I
feel
like
that
hasn't
been
satisfied.
N
Hi
I'm
Lauren
Russell
I
live
half
a
block
in
the
Park
246
South
Street,
st.
Clair
Street
number
three
I
didn't
register
comment
because
I
didn't
know
anything
about
it.
Till
yesterday,
when
someone,
the
Neighborhood,
Association
I,
guess
put
a
flyer
in
my
mailbox,
so
I
sort
of
came
to
figure
out
what's
going
on
I'm
concerned
about
obviously
privatizing
public
land
and
I
also
use
the
park.
I
see
other
people
using
the
park.
N
I
was
also
surprised
by
the
comment
on
light
pollution,
because
I
live
half
a
block
from
it
and
had
an
observe
that
but
I'm
also
concerned
that
if
I
only
found
out
about
it
yesterday,
then
a
lot
of
people
in
the
neighborhood
probably
don't
know
about
it-
haven't
had
a
chance
to
review.
What's
going
on
or
weigh
in
at
all,
so
it
seems
like
there
should
be
postponed
and
the
neighborhood
should
be
consulted.
Mm-Hmm.
J
O
My
name
is
Randall
Taylor
I'm
from
East
Liberty
great
again,
I
stand
here
again
very
disappointed,
but
not
shocked
that
this
City
Councilman
and
and
this
city
continues
to
operate
in
the
same
manner.
There's
no
concern
for
the
people,
of
course,
they're
going
to
be
notified.
They
get
okay
for
meeting
and
it's
and
it's
held
on
a
Monday
because
they're
not
intended
to
be
here,
I'm,
just
stunned
how
the
shenanigans
and
backroom
deals
continue
to
go
on
I'm
stunned.
O
How
LG
Realty
can
can
kick
out
500
of
councilman
Burgesses
constituents
and
he
still
supports
them,
how
they
can
take
the
caseta
into
court
every
chance
they
can
get.
Yet
we
still
stand
her
this
evening,
giving
them
free
land,
free
legal
aid
to
understand
your
solicitor
you're.
Our
city
solicitor
is
going
to
do
free
legal
work
on
their
behalf
again
giving
them
ours
are
free
streets.
Again,
these
bad
actors
are
coming
into
the
city
instead
of
being
ostracized
by
the
city,
instead
of
being
cut
off
by
counsel
Evan
Burgess.
Thanks
for
your
support,
he.
B
D
O
B
We've
had
a
great
hearing
so
far
couple
things
I
would
like
to
address,
though
certain
you'd
like
to
register
comment
well
a
couple
things
that
would
like
to
address
just
I,
I
hate
to
see
misinformation
become
sort
of
the
norm.
This
the
discussion
around
the
swap
of
this
property
has
probably
been
being
discussed,
the
better
part
of
five
years
now,
if
maybe
not
even
a
little
bit
longer
so
this
this
I
I'm
gonna
have
them
removed.
B
N
B
B
Sir,
if
you
wish
to
register
comment,
we
had
an
open
microphone
for
you
to
come
and
register
your
comment.
You
chose
not
to
do
so
anyway.
Having
said
that,
this
has
been
an
active
conversation
and
if,
if
there
are
people
that
have
been
ill
informed
or
misinformed,
I
apologize,
but
we
did
our
due
diligence.
We
did
our
due
diligence
in
scheduling
this
public
hearing
at
the
request
of
25
registered
voters
who
said
they
intended
to
attend
this
public
hearing?
That's
why
we
held
it
on
a
Monday
evening.
B
It's
not
to
hide
anything
it's
to
give
people
the
opportunity
that
work
during
the
day
to
actually
be
able
to
come
out
and
participate
in
the
public
process,
so
25
registered
people
who
committed
to
being
here
for
this
public
hearing
and
signed.
That
petition
were
required
to
be
here,
so
we
put
it
out
there.
We
need
you
to
be
active
and
engage,
and
for
those
of
you
that
are
we
greatly
appreciate
that
you
are
here
tonight
so
with
that
I'll
open
it
up
to
members.
If
you
wish
to
register
comment,
Councilwoman
Harris.
J
P
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
coming
out.
We've
held
this
in
the
evening
or
purpose
so
that
everyone
could
have
their
chance
to
chime
in
I
will
say
simply
two
things
one
is
this
development
is
wholly
and
solely
in
my
council
district,
although
it
borders
other
it
borders.
Another
council
person's
district,
it
is
not
in
their
district,
is
completely
utterly
in
my
council.
District
I
represent
this
area,
and
so
I
am
grateful
for
those
of
you
who
have
reached
out
to
me
and
allow
me
to
to
preside
in
this
conversation.
P
I
wish
more
of
you
had
done
that
that
would
have
been
I
think
the
appropriate
thing
to
do.
I
the
way
council
works.
Oh
is
supposed
to
work.
That,
in
our
tradition,
is
that
normally
the
council
person
who
presides
over
the
district
where
the
process
and
the
project
occurs
leads
that
conversation
I.
Am
anyone
can
have
your
opinion?
Certainly
all
council
people
have
their
opinion,
but
I
tend
to
get
a
little
disappointed
if
other
kinds
of
people
decide
to
lead
in
a
project,
that's
whole
wholly
completely
and
utterly
in
my
council
district.
P
Who've
talked
mostly
all
have
great
agendas,
but
I
am
suggesting
that
this
is
not
the
place
to
have
that
conversation
I'm,
suggesting
that
this
nice
turn
this
has
had
a
variety
of
legal
statures
and
lawsuits
and
mediations
and
council.
Now
is
not
the
place
for
this
conversation
to
continue
it's
actually
back
in
court
and
so
I'm
going
to
recommend
that
the
land
that
this
conversation
goes
back
to
earth
and
Court.
Those
of
you
who
are
interested
and
continue
this
conversation
in
the
proper
place
in
orphan
court.
This
is
not
council's
job
to
mediate.
P
This
continued
process
I
believe
it's
now
in
the
court
system
and
the
court
now
best
be
the
final
arbiter.
So
that
is
my
intention.
My
intention
is
to
move
this
land
swap
the
int.
The
thing
that's
ironic
in
is
it's
some
of
you.
A
few
of
you
know
this
is
this.
Last
walk
really
has
very
little
do
with
the
development
this
development
gonna
happen
with
who
thousands
land
swap.
This
is
really
for
the
park.
P
This
land
swap
is
essential
to
make
the
park
viable
for
the
community
and
that's
why
I
support
it,
because
that's
really
what
this
is
about
is
really
not
about
the
development
at
all
that
they
don't
need
this
for
the
development
it's
really
the
park
and
the
reconfiguration
of
the
park.
That's
really
what
we're
talking
about
now
and
so
I'm,
going
to
recommend
it
and
being
passed
on
Wednesday
and
being
passed
on.
Tuesday
and
I
suggest
that
those
of
you
who
have
issues
with
it
should
go
to
orphans
Court
and
continue
that
conversation.
P
That's
my
own
probe,
that's
my
public
opinion,
that's
my
personal
opinion
and
I
say
no.
Thank
you.
I
want
to
thank
you,
president
cross
for
his
willingness
to
be
very,
very
flexible
and
the
clerk's
office
and
accommodating
so
that
we
could
have
this
evening
meeting
where
everyone
could
be
included,
and
no
one
was
left
out
of
this
conversation
again.
Thank
you
for
your
free
leisure,
okay,.