►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 7/8/20
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
and
welcome
to
Pittsburgh
City
Council
standing
committees,
meeting
for
Wednesday
July,
8th
2020.
My
name
is
Kim
Clark,
Baskin
and
I'm
the
assistant
city
clerk
with
us.
Today
we
have
our
sign
language
interpreter
Megan,
akin
the
following
is
a
list
of
legislation
up
for
preliminary
approval
by
Pittsburgh,
City,
Council,
finance
and
law
committee.
Mr.
LaBelle
is
the
chair.
A
We
have
new
papers,
we
have
bill
number
200,
ordinance,
supplementing
the
Pittsburgh
Code
of
Ordinances
title
one,
administrative,
article,
nine
boards
commissions
and
authorities
to
add
chapter
177
d:
pittsburgh
commission
on
racial
equity
pursuant
to
the
Pittsburgh
Home
Rule
Charter.
This
bill
is
sponsored
by
councilmembers
Ricky
Burgess
and
Daniel
Levin
bill
number
201
resolution
adopting
the
10
commitments
of
racial
equity.
This
bill
is
also
sponsored
by
Reverend
Rickey
Burgess
and
Councilman
Daniel
LaValle.
A
Public
safety
services
committee,
mr.
O'connor,
is
the
chair.
We
have
deferred
papers,
we
have
bill
number
145,
ordinance,
amending
ordinance,
36
of
2019
amending
and
supplementing
the
Pittsburgh
code;
title
six
conduct
article
three
dogs,
cats
and
other
animals
by
repealing
chapter
six,
thirty-nine
crocodilians
in
venomous
snakes
in
its
entirety
and
adding
a
new
chapter:
six,
thirty-nine
crocodilian
species
and
red
eared
sliders
prohibiting
the
keeping
sale
exchange,
adoption
or
transfer
of
such
animals
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
This
bill
is
sponsored
by
councilmembers
crusts.
A
This
bill
is
sponsored
by
councilmembers
Daniel,
Laval
and
Reverend
Ricky
Burgess
bill
number
488
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
Public
Safety,
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
to
enter
into
a
grant
agreement
with
the
Pennsylvania
auto
thefts,
Prevention
Authority
for
the
purpose
of
receiving
grant
funds
in
the
amount
of
two
hundred
and
forty
eight
thousand
four
hundred
and
six
dollars.
That
will
be
used
to
establish,
coordinate
and
fund
activities
to
prevent,
combat
and
reduce
auto
thefts,
Public
Works
Committee.
Mr.
Coghill
is
the
chair.
A
A
new
projecting
sign
at
1505
East,
Carson,
Street,
17th,
Ward
3rd
Council
District
bill
number,
484,
ordinance,
amending
title
for
public
places
and
property;
article
to
telecommunications,
chapter
427
telecommunication
systems
in
the
right-of-way
sections
for
27,
2003
definitions
and
427.
Point
11
consideration
for
row;
use
agreement
to
provide
for
updated
definitions
and
fee
structures
for
wireless
small
cell
facilities,
land
use
and
Economic
Development
Committee.
Mr.
Wilson,
mr.
chair,
we
have
deferred
papers.
A
We
have
bill
number
236
resolution
providing
for
the
designation
as
a
historic
structure
under
title
11
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
that
certain
structure,
known
as
the
Ewalt
house,
located
at
186
home
street
in
a
Lawrenceville
neighborhood
Ninth
Ward
city
of
Pittsburgh,
newpapers
bill
number,
490,
ordinance,
accepting
a
new
street
name;
lucky
Lane
and
a
sixth
Ward
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
As
per
recommendation
by
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
Addressing
Committee.
A
The
following
street
name
was
approved
by
CPAC
in
May
of
2020
bill
number
491
ordinance,
accepting
a
new
street
name;
Skibo
drive-in,
a
14th
board
city
of
Pittsburgh,
as
her
recommendation
by
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
addressing
committee
bill
number
492
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
community-based
organizations
for
Community
and
Economic
Development
for
planning
assistance
in
various
neighborhoods
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
providing
operating
support
for
these
groups
payment
not
to
exceed
$500,000
innovation,
performance
and
asset
management
committee.
Mr.
A
Strassburger
is
the
chair.
We
have
new
papers,
we
have
bill
number
489
resolution
amending
resolution,
570
of
2019,
which
authorized
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
Finance
to
enter
into
a
maintenance
agreement
with
OPEX
corporation
for
maintenance
services
related
to
the
Falcon
red
document
scanning
workstation.
By
exercising
the
option
to
extend
the
term
of
the
agreement
for
one
year
cost
not
to
exceed
ten
thousand
five
hundred
and
forty
dollars
intergovernmental
affairs
committee
miss
grosses
to
chair.
We
have
deferred
papers.
A
A
Number
437
resolution,
adopting
plan
revision
to
the
city
of
Pittsburgh's
official
sewage
facilities,
plan
for
the
Forte
condominiums
at
26:37,
loo,
26,
441,
Penn,
Avenue
and
bill
number
438
resolution
adopting
plan
revision
to
the
city
of
Pittsburgh's
official
sewage
facilities
plan
for
the
Pittsburgh
Distilling
Company
at
24:01,
Smallman
Street.
That
concludes
the
reading
of
the
legislation
of
for
preliminary
approval
by
Pittsburgh
City
Council.
Thank
you
and
have
a
wonderful
day.
A
B
B
You
know,
in
addition,
working
to
continue
to
improve
our
development
review
process,
focusing
on
the
Commission's
working
with
our
zoning
team
on
you
know.
Customer
service
focus
for
the
work
that
they
do,
whether
that's
work
that
comes
through
our
Planning,
Commission
or
other
Commission's
to
people
going
through
the
one-stop
process.
You
know
for
a
shed
or
a
fence,
or
things
like
that
and
you
know,
being
able
to
set
up
and
improve
the
service
license
agreements.
Is
that
what
our
timing
is
to
being
able
to
approve
permits?
B
And
lastly,
you
know
just
focusing
on
you
know:
some
of
the
environmental
planning
work
where
you
know,
which
is
you
know,
can
be
anywhere
from
the
pipe
master
plans
that
we've
been
working
with
Department
of
Public
Works
on
to
really
start
to
rethink
our
open
spaces
to
revisions
that
we
are
just
now,
starting
to
things
like
our
stormwater
management
code
and
then
working,
especially
with
the
connection
between
flooding
and
development
in
places
like
sawmill,
run
and
others.
And
lastly,
you
know
just
you
know,
continuing
our
work
and
improving
our
work
around
the
city's
public.
B
B
And
we
do
for
things
like
the
city's
arts
and
parks
program,
or
you
know,
intersection
improvements
and
work
that
we're
doing
in
public
art
and
intersections,
as
well
as
trying
to
be
more
responsive
to
you
know
to
issues,
and
you
know
that
are
coming
up
in
the
city
and
you
know
in
our
communities
and
that
we
can
use
art
in
public
spaces
and
expression.
So
thank
you,
council
members
here
at
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions,
and
you
know.
C
I
just
wanna
say
we'll
take
them
after
we
do
the
other
two
introductions
and
then
I'll
take
em
all
together,
but
I
do
want
to
thank
you
for
speaking
so
quickly
because
I
know
you
have
a
lot
a
lot
on
your
plate
in
that
you
could
have
a
lot
that
you
could
talk
about.
So
thank
you.
Can
we
next
have
Betsy
magley.
D
Magli
I
am
a
third
year
resident
of
the
city
and
pleased
to
be
appointed
for
consideration
for
the
Equal
Opportunity
Review
Commission.
My
professional
life
has
been
primarily
working
in
the
nonprofit
sector
as
a
fund
raiser
until
2011
when
I
started
my
own
business
as
a
consultant.
So
I
now
have
nine
years
of
experience
of
a
women-owned
small
business
and
I'm
interested
in
supporting
the
city's
desire
to
make
sure
the
playing
field
is
level
for
minorities
and
women
when
it
comes
to
construction
contracts.
D
E
Yes,
my
name
is
Rhoda
Neff
John,
my
resident
of
the
city
and
into
the
shady
side
area
and
I
want
to
just
tell
you
how
pleased
I
am
to
be
appointed
to
the
ethics,
for
it.
I'm
a
lawyer
and,
as
you
probably
all
know,
that
we
as
lawyers
abide
by
a
code
of
ethics
which
we
find
to
be
very
helpful
in
the
practice
of
law.
E
F
Good
morning
Mike,
my
question
is
for
director:
if
I
could
ask
a
couple
questions
here
good
morning
director
morning
that
it's
been
a
pleasure
so
far,
working
with
you
and
I'm
excited
about
your
you
know
about
this
interview,
but
also
your
foster
unity
position
or
your
ongoing
position.
So
I
just
had
a
you
know.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
the
question
about
the
historic
nomination.
That's
somewhat
controversial
here,
coming
up
its
the
Ewald
house.
G
B
B
You
know,
obviously
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
we
we
do
is
periodic
review
of
all
of
our
codes.
You
know,
I,
think
that
you
know
title
11
with
historic
review
is
is
no
different.
We
have,
we
did
do
work
back
when
I
was
a
planner
in
2012
around
creating
the
city's
cultural
heritage
plan
to
identify
what
the
city's
vision
at
the
time
was
for
historic
preservation
and
and
cultural
and
cultural.
Her
theory
source
preservation
identified
that
at
the
same
time,
there
are
a
number
of
opportunities.
B
Both
you
know
for
protection,
and
that
doesn't
always
mean
that
doesn't
always
mean
his.
You
know
historic,
but
you
know
historic
preservation
in
the
form
of
a
city,
historic
district
or
a
city,
historic
building.
So
you
know
we
have
you
know.
We've
tried
to
look
at.
You
know
in
additional
ways
to
do
that.
You
know
looking
forward
to
finally
getting
over
the
hump
work
around
city
conservation
districts.
You
know
as
a
means
to
protect
character
in
some
of
our
historic.
You
know
some
of
our.
You
know
older
neighborhoods.
B
That
may
not
necessarily
be
you
as
far
as
a
city,
historic
district
and
having
you
know,
the
requirements
and
regulations
of
the
city,
historic
district.
Also
looking
at
you
know,
changes
to
our
you
know
some
of
the
codes
and
policies
that
we
have,
whether
that
be
our
zoning
code
and
the
regulations
that
we
have
in
our
zoning
code
that
help.
B
This
is
a
conversation
I've
had
with
you
in
your
office
around
things
like
you
know,
creating
more
definition
and
policy
around
demolition,
and
you
know
and
where
the
city
does
demolition
and
what
you
know
if
there's
a
way
to
develop
opportunities
for
conservation
and
other
means
of
buildings
that
you
know
are
starting
to
deteriorate
in
our
neighborhoods.
So
you
know
I
think
trying
to
make
sure
that
there
are
a
variety
of
options.
B
You
know
for
folks
there
there
are
going
to
be
buildings
and
districts
that
are
significant
from
a
historic
perspective,
and
you
know
in
trying
to
continue
the
work
of
the
historic
architectural
inventory
and
our
communities
are
really
trying
to
identify
those
so
that
you
know
whether
it's
the
city
or
whether
it's
others
that
you
know
they're
able
to
do
that
work,
while
providing
other
options
that
aren't
necessarily
historic
that
aren't
always
historic.
Nomination
for
for
buildings
and
districts.
F
Thanks
and
you,
you
somewhat
started
a
hit
on
like
my
next
question,
which
was
about
demolition
and
so
you've
met.
We've
had
some
preliminary
conversations
about
having
a
more
strategic
than
demolition
program.
Could
you
and
you
alluded
to
that?
Could
you
elaborate
on
your
vision,
sure.
B
B
And
so
we
want
to
try
to
figure
out
what
you
know
develop,
what
those
criteria
are
with
permits,
licenses
and
inspections,
so
that,
if,
if
we're
talking
about
you
know
something
that
is
on
a
corner,
that's
more
prominent
to
you
know
to
communities
or
you
know,
or
something
that
is
part
of
an
intact
row.
Or
you
know,
or
you
know
that
if
there
are
other
you
know,
other
standards
like
that
that
we
can
start
to.
You
know
work
with
communities
to
develop,
to
try
to
say
all
right.
B
You
know
both
the
State
Historic,
Preservation,
Office
and
others
to
try
to
see
how
we
might
be
able
to
create
a
program
that
looks
at
conserving.
You
know
at
some
ways
of
conserving
some
of
those
buildings.
Obviously
there's
a
lot
of
hurdles
there
relative
to
things
like
title
and
ownership,
but
you
know
really
would
want
to
dig
into
that
to
try
to
figure
out
how
we
can.
You
know
create
more
priority
to
how
you
know
the
city
treats
these
deteriorating
buildings
in
our
neighborhoods.
F
All
right,
yeah
I,
know
I'm
interested
in
in
that
process,
especially
in
my
district,
where
there
are
so
many
landslides
and
some
of
these
structures
are,
they
may
have-
or
it
may
have
already
been
done
in
my
list
at
one
point-
they're
just
harder
to
get
to
now,
so
I'm
interested
some
sort
of
strategic
way
of
doing
that.
So
thanks
and
I
appreciate
your
time
today.
Thank
you,
Thank.
H
Thank
you
for
being
here
today
and
congratulations,
and
thank
you
also
for
a
willingness
to
serve
in
this
role.
Clearly,
as
you
know,
working
your
way
up
through
City,
Planning
and
being
assistant
WT
director
for
many
years.
You
are
familiar
with
the
kind
of
day-to-day
issues
and
many
of
like
the
bread-and-butter
issues
that
touch
people's
lives
and
that
people
most
see
most.
But
in
this
role
you
have
the
opportunity
to
also
create
a
vision
for
the
city
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
share
with
us
your
vision.
H
B
And
I
in
my
brief
remarks.
In
the
beginning,
you
kind
of
stated:
over
the
last
year,
we've
really
tried
to
develop
some
core
values,
as
a
department.
I
think
you
know
really
focusing
around
kind
of
issues
of
equity
and
sustainability
most
heavily.
Those
are
very
broad,
and
you
know
I
think
we
understand
that
we
really
want
to
be
able
to
refine
those
through
engagement
and
listening
to
the
public,
and
you
know
we,
as
a
part
of
you,
know
my
work.
B
H
It's
a
tricky
balance
because
you
want
to
know
the
big
picture
items
that
people
want
to
see
and
what
their
future
city
should
look
like,
but
at
the
same
time
not
be
stymied
by
sort
of
a
not
in
my
backyard
mentality.
That
could
then
that
could
stop
that
vision
from
becoming
a
reality.
So
I
know
it's
a
tricky
balance,
but
I
do
think
that
having
a
process
of
really
good
processes
in
place
to
hear
those
feedback
in
those
comments
is
really
important.
So
I
appreciate
that
and.
B
It
helps
us
be
able
to
make
some
of
those
hard
decisions
right.
You
know,
because
you
know
those
things
when
those
when
those
larger
visions,
you
know,
then
translate
to
how
development
occurs
on
a
specific
site,
or
you
know
how
one
property
may
be
prioritized
for
you
know
a
park
space
over
another.
Those
are
conversations
that
you
know.
B
Those
are
conversations
that
we
have
to
have
and
those
are
you
know,
debates
that
happen
in
the
you
know
in
the
public,
and
you
know
without
without
that
vision,
without
working
to
get
that
vision,
it's
it's
harder
for.
You
know
we
have
to
have
those
discussions
on
a
case
by
case
basis,
and
we
we
need
to
you
know:
I
mean
we
need
to
do
better
to
be
able
to.
You
know,
get
that
input
from
residents
create,
you
know,
create
those
vision
and
you
know
have
them,
create
those
vision
and
goals.
H
Thank
you,
my
only
other
question
for
you
is,
you
know
it's
the
30th
anniversary
of
the
signing
of
the
Americans
for
Disabilities,
Act
and
I.
Wonder
if
you
can
speak
to
how
you
envision
integrating
accessibility
into
all
aspects
of
planning,
including
coordination
with
mobility
and
infrastructure
projects
and
in
different
in
other
departments.
How
you
see
you
can
integrate
into
everything
that
we
do
as
a
city,
especially
since
you
know,
we
haven't
necessarily
fully
met
the
the
mandate
of
the
88
from
30
years
ago,
not
just
us
as
a
city
cities
across
the
country.
B
Sure
so
you
know
I
mean
we
in
the
last
nine
months
have
brought
on
a
new
ad,
a
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
coordinator.
One
of
the
you
know,
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
we've
been
doing
over
the
last
few
months
has
just
been
trying
to
trying
to
reconvene
and
and
redevelop
the
city
County
Task
Force
on
disabilities,
to
really
be
able
to
be
more
of
a
hub
for
for
the
community
to
really
be
able
to
understand
their
needs
and
desires,
and
then,
on
the
internal
side.
B
B
H
Okay,
I
didn't
know
with
her
living
on
as
well
signal
miss
Magway,
thank
you
for
joining
us
today
and
for
your
willingness
to
serve
and
I
simply
wanted
to
say
that
I've
done
a
good
amount
of
work
over
the
last
couple
of
years
with
the
EO
RFC
and
you
know,
I
think
they've
continued
to
improve
what
they
do
and
their
processes
and
a
couple
of
things
that
we're
still
looking
for
is
consistent
communication
with
counsel
so
that
every
single
time
Council
is
looking
at
a
contract.
H
We
know
exactly
whether
do
RC
is
on
it,
what
their,
what
their
rationale
for
their
decision
was,
and
you
know
a
little
bit
more
information
about
the
other
vendors
that
might
have
been
considered
as
well
through
the
process.
So
just
so,
you
know
where
we're
standing
and
that
you
have
that
your
eyes
wide
open
going
in,
and
you
know,
I
think
that
there's
a
real
opportunity.
H
D
Is
a
lot
but
it's
good
to
hear
your
feedback
I.
Consider
myself
to
be
a
good
communicator.
So
hearing
that
you
are
interested
in
more
communication
between
the
Commission
and
the
council
sounds
like
something
that
you
know
is
easily
tackled.
As
far
as
the
actual
work
of
the
Commission
I
think
I'll
be
able
to
speak
to
better
once
I'm
a
bit
more
involved,
but,
as
I
said
when
I
introduced
myself
as
a
minority
business
owner
I
do
have
some
perspective.
D
That
I
hope
will
be
useful
to
the
Commission,
and
my
husband
also
happens
to
own
his
small
business
as
well.
So
you
can
imagine
our
pillow
talk,
so
you
know
I.
This
is
something
that's
of
interest
to
me.
I
also
as
a
sidenote
consult
for
the
Pittsburgh
promise,
and
they
you
may
well
know
give
scholarships
not
only
to
public
school
students
who
go
on
to
college,
but
also
to
trade.
School
and
I
would
love
to
see
some
kind
of
a
pipeline
there.
H
C
C
C
C
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
do
think
that
you
have
changed
a
lot
of
things,
but
one
of
the
things
I
have
a
concern
with
is
the
communication
between
many
of
the
departments
and
the
city
county
and
city
council.
It's
been
an
issue
that
I'm
actually
starting
to
work
on
legislatively
because
I
feel
like
there
needs
to
be
more
done
and
I
am
so
many
years
of
asking
to
make
sure
that
we're
aware
of
things
happening
has
gone
on
for
so
long
and
we
have
city
planners
and
I
want
to
say,
I.
C
Think
our
planners
work
tremendously
hard,
as
do
you,
but
I
think
that
their
opponent,
so
many
directions
and
I
wish
I'd
see
planners,
and
we
have
so
many
planners,
but
no
plans
for
my
district,
so
I'd
like
to
see
action
plans,
but
I
do
think
that
they've
worked
very
hard
and
I
want
to
make
sure
they
acknowledge
us
on
the
Sheridan
Park
master
plan
which
the
community
is
excited
about,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
you,
but
for
that
and
for
your
leadership
under
that.
But
I'm
just
going
to
say,
I'll
save
my
questions.
C
C
B
B
I
discussed
some
of
the
some
of
those
things
both
in
councilperson,
Strassburger
yeah.
You
know
question
as
well.
I
think
that
you
know
really
just
mobilization.
Continued
mobilization
of
the
city
County
Task
Force
on
disabilities
is
important.
You
know
working
to
develop
the
liaisons
within
departments
and
having
Hillary
as
our
disability
coordinator
work
to
do
that
is
important,
and
then
you
know
working
on
a
self-evaluation
for
the
ad
a
transition
plan
that
city
is
required
to
to
do
in
transition
plan.
Work
that
work
required
to
do
is
really
important
and
that's
you
know.
B
C
You
I
just
want
to
say
that,
while
you're
doing
that,
work,
I
have
received
many
many
times
requests
for
someone
from
Pioneer
school
to
serve
on
a
committee
or
review
so
that
they
can
make
sure
that
their
concerns
are
addressed
and
and
I.
Think
when
the
kids
are
asking
to
be
a
part
of
something
we
should
find
some
way
to,
especially
a
school
like
Pioneer.
C
They
have
you
know
it's
a
school
with
a
lot
of
children,
students
with
disabilities,
and
that
is
their
focus
and
there's
sometimes
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
are
there
that
are
older,
and
they
were
telling
me
how
there's
obstacles
they
had
just
on
a
trip
downtown
and
with
the
streets
and
being
dropped
off,
and
even
even
the
things
that
we
have
for
safety
for
other
people,
we're
blocking
them
in
their
wheelchairs,
which
are
not.
Some
of
them
are
not
just
a
standard
wheelchair,
so
we
have
to
sometimes
think
outside
the
box.
C
So
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
addressing
those
issues
and
that,
while
we're
putting
bike
lanes
in
and
we're
putting
in
the
ballers
to
keep
people
safe
and
painting,
like
that,
we
remember
that
there's
a
disability
community
that
wants
to
get
around
this
city
as
well
and
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
those
students,
at
least
to
feel
like
they
have
a
voice.
So.
C
B
C
Make
sure
I
send
it
over
today?
Okay,
that's
it
for
me
anyone
else
and
seeing
that
just
thank
you
all
for
your
willingness
to
serve
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you
I
think
these
will
be
up
on
next
week's
agenda.
Correct
madam
clerk,
so
they'll
be
up
for
next
four
vote
for
next
week.
So
thank
you
all
have
a
good
week
and
I'll
turn
this
over
now
to
Council.
You
know
mal!
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Looking
forward
to
working
with
you
director.
J
Thank
you
all.
We
will
now
transition
to
our
sending
committee
meeting
agenda
for
Wednesday
July
8th.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
public
comment.
We
do
have
a
number
of
registered
speakers.
I
would
just
ask
each
speaker
once
you
get
on
so
please
state
your
name
and
neighborhood
for
the
record.
Our
first
speaker
is
Gary.
Cal
Mayer
is
mr.
Cal
Meyer
on
the
phone.
Yes.
I
I
I
have
spoken
in
the
past
and
will
not
repeat
the
details
about
the
owner
being
a
slave
owner
and
the
fact
that
the
property
is
woefully
unworthy
structurally
of
nomination
today
and
I've
spoken
yesterday
about
the
what
I
call
the
legal
elements
that
give
me
problems
with
this
matter,
as
well
as
the
human
element
which
has
affected
this
family
terribly.
But
today,
I
want
to
speak
for
just
a
moment
about
the
trouble
I'm
having
with
the
events
of
the
procedure.
I
In
this
case,
this
house
was
originally
nominated
by
a
man
who
made
a
woefully
inadequate
offer
to
buy
the
property
and
after
less
than
1/10
of
its
value
and
after
that
was
of
course
rejected.
He
then
nominated
the
property
for
this
designation
and
stopped
the
approved
demolition
of
this
unsafe
structure.
This
is
a
very
suspicious
action,
if
I
believe,
and
secondly,
after
it
was
nominated,
the
nominators
and
the
Commission.
I
The
historic
Commission
itself,
then
said
note
sent
notices
of
the
hearing
to
the
property,
which
was
abandoned
for
many
many
years,
even
though
they
had
the
real
owners
address
at
home
where
taxes
were
received
and
paid.
As
a
result
of
this,
the
homeowner
got
about
two
hours
notice
of
the
hearing
before
the
Planning
Commission,
somehow,
by
a
miracle,
Beth
Rupert
was
able
to
get
there
from
the
North
Hills
and
at
least
present
something
I
would
not
able
to
prepare
or
be
present,
nor
was
Eric
her
husband
able
to
do
that.
These
are
these.
I
Are
matters
that
really
trouble
me
that
something
rather,
if
not
suspicious,
at
least
very
unfair,
has
occurred
in
this
case
and
truthfully
I
think
if
a
proper
presentation
had
happened
way
back
at
the
historic
Commission
meeting,
this
matter
would
not
have
gone
forward
to
where
it
is
now
and
taking
all
of
our
time,
I
think
unfairly
and
needlessly
I.
Ask
you
again
to
deny
historic
status,
designation
of
this
property
and
once
again,
thank
you
all
for
your
time.
K
I
am
here.
Thank
you.
I
also
am
here
to
speak
against
the
historic
designation
of
186
home
Street
in
Lawrenceville
on
behalf
of
owner
Eric
Rupert,
due
to
zoom
coordination
issues.
I
lost
some
of
my
time
to
speak
yesterday,
so
I
am
going
to
finish
my
presentation
now.
I
spoke
about
the
three
types:
different
types
of
integrity
required
by
section
1101
point
4,
to
make
a
property
worth
important
word
worth:
preserving
historical,
moral
and
structural
dealing
with
criteria
two
three
and
sum
of
seven.
K
This
is
the
law
and
we
must
all
follow
it
as
to
structural
integrity.
You
have
the
reports
of
Taylor
structural
engineers,
saying
that
this
is
gone
regarding
criteria
to
its
Samuel
E
Walt,
significantly
important
word
contribute
to
the
cultural
or
historic
aspect
of
the
development
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
K
Yesterday
I
was
quoting
from
a
book
called
precious
quartz
records
by
Margaret
Pierson
Bothwell,
wherein
she
said
that
he
Walt's
name
was
known
because
he
was
a
politician
not
because
of
quote
his
own
acts
as
there
is
no
record
of
a
significant
historical
contribution
being
made
by
Samuel
E
Walt,
her
words,
not
mine.
He
does
not
qualify
under
criteria
two
for
this
reason
and
another
more
like
integrity,
the
second
type
of
integrity-
and
you
repeatedly
heard
about
the
1780,
Pennsylvania
slavery
and
Mansa
pation
act
and
how
he
managed
to
own
two
slaves
for
30
years.
K
He
does
not
deserve
the
honor
criteria
to
would
bestow
on
him
as
to
this
building's
identification,
also
required
by
a
limit
of
1.4
for
with
Samuel
E
Walt
under
criteria
to
reach
the
net.
The
National
Register
of
Historic
Places
states
of
the
existing,
this
particular
evil
house
he
had
eel
multiples
was
built
in
1840,
but
he
died
in
1841
and
his
granddaughter
lived
there.
He
actually
lived
above
a
tavern
on
where
he
had
built
on
Water
Street
in
the
South
Side
flats.
K
It's
actually
in
George
Washington,
stop
here
type
of
situation
once
again,
there's
that
requirement
Association
be
significant
and
it
was
not
as
to
the
third
type
historical
and
integrity.
Yesterday,
I
showed
even
based
on
the
Lawrenceville
Historical
Society's
own
experts
report.
The
original
materials
and
workmanship
required
to
be
present
for
historical
integrity
are
simply
gone,
and
every
paragraph
of
their
own
report
appear.
The
words
removed
replaced
appears
to
have
been
there.
K
Even
an
expert
restoration
with
modern
materials
would
not
qualify
a
property
for
historic
registration,
as
only
the
original
materials
give
a
property,
historic
and
integrity.
In
the
same
vein,
a
rigged
revival
house
must
be
distinguished
presently
with
quality
of
design,
detail,
materials
or
craftsmanship
and
be
a
superb
example.
Hopefully,
you've
seen
my
report,
it
is
not
under
the
law
we
all
have
to
follow.
Only
the
valid
emotional
and
not
only
the
valid
emotional
issues
involved.
This
property
does
not
have
a
three.
L
Yes,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
you
letting
me
to
come,
speak
and
allowing
me
to
comment.
Basically.
I
just
have
a
very
short
general
statement
in
support
of
several
of
the
items
on
today's
meeting
agenda.
Basically,
I
would
like
to
start
just
by
saying.
Excuse
me
that
white
people
in
the
United
States,
including
myself,
we
like
to
think
our
society
of
equal.
We
say
things
like
I,
don't
see
color
or
all
I've
matter,
but
our
actions
say
something
else.
I
will
make
the
choice
to
move
to
so-called
good
neighborhoods
like
arrest.
L
Black
people
are
three
times
higher
than
white
people
and
demolish
historically
black
neighborhoods
sports
stadiums.
Our
actions
reaffirm
our
place
at
the
top
of
a
shameful
pyramid
built
on
the
grim
foundations
of
slavery.
I
am
instead
vast
total
support
any
of
the
red
resolutions
by
councilmember
Burgess,
especially
those
in
regards
to
going
ahead
and
the
basically
the
construction
of
the
larimar
East
Liberty
phases.
3
&,
4
housing
is
a
huge
issue.
Basically
any
support
that
I
can
give
I
will
to
the
city
council,
putting
funding
and
time
into
black
communities.
L
L
All
of
this
in
light
of
the
breed
legislation
which
would
unveiled
yesterday
nationally
and
I,
believe
that
these
are
a
wonderful
precedents
that
our
council
members
are
setting,
and
these
are
the
directions
in
which
I
would
like
to
see
Pittsburgh
go
in
the
future
and
with
that.
Thank
you
all
very
much
for
your
time
and
I
will
concede.
Thank.
M
So
on
Saturday
I
was
in
downtown
at
around
a
quarter
to
6:00
and
I
was
greeted
by
a
line
of
police
officers
with
riot
helmets
and
billy
clubs
and
I
thought.
We
learned
our
lesson
after
June.
First,
but
apparently
not
this
display
was
blatant.
Intimidation
against
peaceful
protesters
keep
in
mind
the
rep.
The
more
contentious
rally
with
the
counter
protest
was
significantly
earlier
that
day
and
was
on
the
north
side.
M
There
was
no
no
biz,
they
had
no
business
going
downtown
and
greeting
us
like
that
after
every
Saturday,
we've
had
peaceful
protests
since
in
June,
and
there
was
no
reason
to
assume
otherwise
this
time
so
the
day.
But
I
would
like
to
ask
that
you
may
there's
been
a
ten
and
a
half
million
dollar
proposed
increase
to
the
Pittsburgh
police
budget
for
2021
and
I
am
firmly
against
increasing
the
budget
by
that.
M
N
You
cannot
stir
your
video
okay.
There
we
go.
Thank
you
good
morning,
councilmembers.
My
name
is
Beth
Rupert
and
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
listen
to
me
over
these
last
few
weeks,
you've
met
my
husband
Eric,
and
these
are
our
three
children,
Andrew
Amanda
and
Ashley.
We
are
pleading
with
you
to
vote
no
today,
as
this
nomination
will
destroy
our
family.
N
We
can
lose
not
only
this
house,
but
the
house
we
live
in
as
well
as
our
life
savings
and
our
business
I,
don't
know
if
you
own
your
own
home
or
have
you
ever
lost
a
parent,
but
please
try
to
put
yourself
in
our
shoes.
Your
beloved
father
dies
of
cancer
and
you
have
the
mounting
bills
from
his
estate.
He
leaves
his
house
that
he
worked
all
his
life
for
pay
taxes
to
provide
a
means
to
pay
off
these
debts
and
provide
you
with
an
inheritance.
N
You
try
to
maintain
the
house
the
best
you
can
paying
the
bills
up,
keeping
the
property,
but
at
the
same
time
selling
it
a
stranger
comes
along.
He
liked
your
house
and
wants
to
dictate
what
you
can
do
with
your
house.
This
person
does
not
offer
any
money
to
purchase
the
house,
but
he
has
total
control
of
what
you
do.
As
he
knows
the
system
and
has
friends
in
high
places,
my
attorney
misspoke
as
a
stakeholder
offered
the
purchase
yet
could
not
get
a
loan
at
fair
market
value,
not
mr.
Cochran.
N
N
Until
week
later,
you
have
worked
tirelessly
for
years
trying
to
show
it
to
appease
a
stranger
who
again
has
no
vested
interest
and
more
concerning
lives
in
a
house
that
is,
your
house
has
twin
a
Greek
Revival.
You
question
this
person
suspense
meant
in
history
to
this
torkoal
committee
when
he
has
not
even
nominated
his
own
home
and
miraculously
a
week
later
his
house
is
nominated.
You
have
just
voted
on
that
house,
the
maori
hast
last
week.
You
worry
every
night
that
this
house
can
fall
down
and
hurt
someone.
N
O
J
P
Okay,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
allow
me
to
speak
today.
Once
again,
my
name
is
Matt.
Duque
I
am
the
managing
member
of
the
entity
that
currently
has
186
home
street
under
agreement
to
purchase
from
Erik
and
Beth
Rupert
I'm
heavily
invested
in
the
Lawrenceville
community,
as
our
business
is
a
small-scale
residential
development
and
building
company,
as
you
just
heard
from
Beth.
Obviously,
this
is
something
that
the
owner
vehemently
does
not
want.
She
has.
P
She,
along
with
her
family,
have
been
put
through
a
lot
over
the
past
few
years,
especially
the
past
12
months,
as
evidence
from
what
is
taking
place
with
the
passed
hearings
and
meetings
that
we
that
we've
been
involved
with.
So
the
financial
effects
have
been
pretty
dramatic,
as
you
just
heard
from
Beth
herself,
so
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
a
couple
other
points.
It
might
be
repeating
some
items,
but
I
thought
that
it
was
important
the
once
again
the
structure
is
in
imminent
danger
of
collapse.
We
did
have
a
licensed
professional
engineer.
P
Taylor
structural
come
out
multiple
times
right
up
multiple
reports,
identifying
the
danger
that
this
building
presents
and
recommending
that
it
does
be
demolished
immediately.
The
clear
the
clear
and
present
danger
is
to
the
nearby
public
and
specifically
the
neighbor
behind
them.
Their
safety
and
well-being
is
being
threatened
until
this
house
is
demolished,
as
Beth
said,
they
put
the
house
on
the
market
over
the
past
few
years.
Nobody
has
stepped
forward
to
purchase
it
at
a
fair
price.
P
Only
now
that
she
has
an
under
agreement
with
somebody
that
is
a
real
buyer,
with
a
real
offer
who
can
perform
now.
There's
neighborhood
groups
that
are
trying
to
block
that
from
happening
to
try
to
serve
their
interests,
to
nominate
a
historic
where
they
have
no
skin
in
the
game,
and
it
is
not
affecting
them
whatsoever
as
it
is
affecting
Beth
and
her
family.
Obviously,
so,
as
I
call
it
today,
I
decide
you
to.
Please
consider
this
impact
that
it
is
having
on
the
owner
and
their
family.
P
J
Q
Penrose
is
developing
three
single-family
houses
at
the
corner
of
39th,
Street
and
Butler,
which
is
currently
was
vacant
and
has
the
billboard
on
the
corner
there
as
reference,
and
we
received
all
our
zoning
approvals
and
all
our
PR
PLI
approvals
and
are
currently
under
construction,
and
the
project
is
currently
in
the
framing
phase
of
the
project.
The
only
remaining
permit
that
we
need
is
the
sewage
facility
planning
module
will
be
approved
so
that
we
can
go
ahead
and
get
our
plumbing
inspections.
Q
If
we
don't
get
this
soon,
we
will
have
to
stop
construction
and
the
houses
will
have
to
sit
there
unfinished
until
we
get
these
approvals.
The
main
reason
why
we
requested
to
speak
today
is
to
discuss
the
urgency
of
finishing
these
houses
as
soon
as
possible,
particularly
one
of
those
the
briar
family
is
in
a
serious
battle.
With
cancer.
There
are
37
year.
Q
Old
daughter
has
a
very
complexed
aggressive
tumor
in
her
face
in
her
neck
and
which
is
life-threatening
she's
already
went
through
three
very
complex
surgery,
surgeries
and
she
really
needed
to
most
of
her.
Treatments
are
being
taken
care
of
by
a
UPMC,
which
is
the
only
health
care
system
seems
that
can
handle
this
complex
type
of
cancer
that
she
has
because
of
this.
Q
Her
mom
and
dad
have
decided
to
move
to
Pittsburgh
to
take
care
of
her
and
as
part
of
that
process,
they
wanted
to
build
a
new
home
versus
buying
an
older
home
that
could
potentially
have
environmental
conditions.
That
would
be
to
potentially
harm
her,
so
they
are
looking
at
building
buying
one
of
these
houses
in
Lawrenceville.
You
know
so
that
they
can
live
there
with
her
daughter.
Q
She
can
be
close
to
the
city
and
UPMC
she's,
currently
renting
right
now,
so
again,
with
the
situation
with
code
with
night
team,
it's
very
very
important
that
they
get
her
into
a
more
stable
and
isolated
type
of
environment.
So
we're
just
asking
for
at
the
next
Beaufort
bill,
20
2003
6
Ford,
to
be
casera
to
be
approved
thanks.
So
much
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
J
R
J
R
Right,
my
name
is
Joe
Casey
I'm,
a
resident
of
the
10th
board
and
a
managing
member
of
the
business
currently
under
contract
to
purchased
186
helm
Street.
Our
business
is
a
small-scale
residential
development
company
and
a
builder
heavily
invested
in
the
Lawrenceville
community,
as
well
as
others
like
today,
I'd
like
to
discuss
three
items
in
regards
to
186
home
Street.
That
I
hope
will
add
a
bit
of
context.
Insight
when
considering
your
vote,
one
timeline
and
sequence
of
events
to
financial
impact
and
feasibility.
R
If
the
property
is
dean,
gist
or
three,
the
current
approved
development
timeline
the--,
the
property
was
initially
listed
and
marketed
by
the
Rupert
family
years
ago.
The
family
has
had
hundreds
of
inquiries
and
showings
over
that
time
to
individuals
and
businesses,
many
of
whom
are
investors
in
architects
that
consider
themselves
specialists
in
restoring
historic
properties.
R
Despite
the
overwhelming
interest
for
the
property,
the
rumors
did
not
receive
one
viable
offer
from
any
parties,
particularly
those
that
have
argued
for
historic
preservation
to
date
and
prior
to
our
involvement,
which
is
as
follows:
July
15th
of
2019
we
went
under
agreement
to
purchase
the
property
July
17th.
We
made
initial
contact
with
the
community
group
Lawrenceville
United
at
July,
18th
orange
Lawrenceville
United
introduced
us
to
Lawrenceville
stakeholders,
and
we
had
our
initial
conversation.
R
August
8th,
we
held
the
public
meeting
that
was
promoted
and
hosted
by
Lawrenceville
United
oddest
15th
was
our
Zoning
Board
of
Adjustment.
Hearing
October
24th
was
the
formal
notice.
We
received
the
formal
notice
of
unanimous
approval
of
our
proposed
development
and
that
was
issued
to
all
parties.
December
3rd
was
the
final
day
of
the
15
day
waiting
period
when
filing
for
the
demolition
permit.
Coincidentally,
on
December
3rd,
a
complete
historic
nomination
application
was
received
by
the
city
through
the
reason
I've.
R
Given
you,
the
sequence
of
events
and
timeline
is
say,
you
understand
the
exposure
of
those
of
this
project
to
the
public
and
any
interested
party
to
express
their
pain
and
historic
value
or
even
purchase
it.
However,
at
no
point
prior
to
the
initial
historic
application
submission
in
December,
was
there
an
argument
made
by
any
parties
from
Lawrenceville
stakeholders,
Lawrence
the
United
or
other
community
members,
that
the
property
has
historic
significance?
R
In
fact,
on
record
at
the
Zoning
Board
of
Adjustment
hearing
the
Lawrenceville
stakeholders,
their
attorney
and
two
architects
that
specialize
in
historic
renovation
and
have
also
toured
the
property
multiple
times
argued
not
to
save
the
property,
but
to
alter
our
proposed
development
of
five
units
to
three
units
which
would
still
require
the
demolition
of
the
structure
and
at
no
point
mentioned
historic
significance.
It
was
only
after
the
Zoning
Board
issued
their
decision
of
approval
for
the
development
that
a
historic
nomination
was
considered
and
eventually
filed.
R
This
type
of
action
sets
a
precedent
for
any
individual
or
group
who
happens
to
disagree
with
proposed
alterations
to
any
property,
to
simple
file,
simply
file
for
historic
nominations
to
hopefully
deter
or
stop
the
proposed
alterations,
regardless
of
their
equitable
interest.
My
background
in
finance
and
private
equity,
along
with
currently
investing
and
living
in
the
community.
It
makes
it
very
easy
for
us
to
include
why
the
hundreds
of
interested
parties,
community
groups,
architects
and
other
interested
parties
have
not
moved
forward
with
the
purchase
and
restoration
of
the
existing
property.
R
S
Grieving
socio,
my
title
is
Vika
Hana
Hou
Makena,
the
grand
Inka
of
the
Iroquois
Confederacy
of
Aborigine
American
people.
What
I'm
asking
of
City
Council
members
to
do
is
to
provide
equity
for
the
everything
American
people
to
ensure
that
our
governments
have
government
relationship
is
intact
and
secured
to
ensure
that
our
right
at
average
American
people
are
protected.
Our
liberties
are
protected,
as
we
have
been
here
since
time
and
memorial
we
are
being
forcefully
assimilated
into
a
system
that
we
do
not
belong
in.
We
have
our
own
Constitution.
We
have
our
own
form
of
identification.
S
We
are
being
assumed
to
be
black
Negro
and
colored
due
to
the
acts
of
Walter,
Ashley,
flicker
and
19.
Well,
okay-
and
we
want
the
city
to
create
a
liaison
to
open
up
the
talk.
So
we
can
make
sure
that
the
aborigine
American
people
are
acknowledged
in
our
own
homeland.
We
shall
not
be
meant
to
be
exile
in
our
own
homeland
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
our
travels
are
not
impeded,
that
our
right
to
practice,
medicine
in
our
own
form,
is
not
impeded
upon.
S
In
regards
also
through
the
legal
system
that
govern
over
citizens
and
make
sure
that
we
are
not
assumed
to
be
citizen,
okay
and
as
I.
So
listen
to
everyone
talk
about
historical
land
preservation.
Those
are
our
lands,
remind
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
whose
land
is
belong
to
the
so-called
Indian.
We
are
referred
to
as
Indians
that
we
are
the
true,
the
first
American
that
were
here
before
so
called
Christopher
Columbus
and
all
of
these
other
foreign
invaders
came
to
our
land
and
sold
our
land
and
then
hid
our
identity
through
the
education
system.
S
So
we
stand
here
united
and
strong,
but
we
will
not
be
forced
to
assimilate
into
a
system
that
is
not
of
our
own.
We
have
our
own
culture,
we
have
our
own
custom
and
here's
about
time
that
the
city
does
the
right
thing
and
acknowledges
that,
because
they
hold
the
records,
downtown
and
other
various
spaces
and
places
there
is
a
burial
site
in
downtown
Pittsburgh
of
indigenous
men
and
women
and
children
who
are
slaughtered.
But
our
blood
of
our
ancestors
are
in
this
land.
J
T
Name
is
Mary
Coleman
I
live
on
43rd
Street
I
am
speaking
today
to
ask
for
your
support
of
the
city.
Historic
designation
of
186
home
Street
in
Lawrenceville,
built
in
the
early
1800s.
This
Greek
Revival
home
sits
on
a
tranquil
tree-lined
lot
about
half
a
block
off
of
Butler
Street.
It
provides
a
peaceful
entrance
to
the
beautifully
maintained
houses
on
home
street
I
have
lived
in
Lawrence
still
for
26
years
and
often
walked
past
the
house.
While
mr.
T
George
Rupert
was
sitting
on
the
porch,
we
always
waved
and
had
brief
conversations
interactions
like
those
are
hard
to
come
by
with
residents
of
the
new
townhouses
being
built
in
Lawrenceville
garage
on
the
ground
floor.
Three
stories
above
and
rooftop
decks
do
not
provide
for
conversations
residents
pull
into
their
garages
lower
the
door
and
enter
their
living
space
from
the
garage
not
to
be
seen
again
until
they
back
out
of
that
garage
Lawrenceville
is
losing
its
neighborhood
I
wish
developers
had
respect
for
those
who
live
here.
T
I
wish
they
had
respect
for
the
architecture
that
precedes
their
desire
to
improve
the
neighborhood.
When
it's
only
about
the
money
they
can
make
on
their
poorly
design,
stick
out
like
a
sore
thumb
houses,
the
historic
Review,
Commission
and
City
Planning
voted
that
this
house
has
historic
value.
It's
nearly
200
years
old.
How
can
it
not
have
historic
value?
Lawrenceville
was
honored
a
year
ago
with
the
national
designation
as
an
historic
district,
186
Holmes,
Street
and
Maori
Addison,
which
you
granted
the
city
designation
both
contributed
to
Lawrenceville
receiving
that
national
designation.
T
There
are
only
a
few
Greek
Revival
houses
in
Pittsburgh.
Please
recognize
186
Holmes
Street,
as
you
did
the
Mallory
Addison
house
with
the
city,
historic
designation.
It
deserves
it.
This
house,
if
properly
listed
qualified
real
estate
agent,
could
be
sold
at
fair
market
value
to
someone
who
has
foresight
to
exterior
to
its
original
state.
T
It
has
been
applied
over
the
years,
but
original
details
and
window
openings
can
still
be
seen
that
states
the
house
is
historic,
structurally
found
and
in
need
of
a
little
TLC
in
public,
the
Rupert's
say
there
is
no
historic
value
and
that
it's
falling
down
the
story
seems
to
change
depending
on
who
they
are
speaking
before.
I
have
one
last
thought
the
history
of
our
country
is
not
pretty,
and
we
cannot
change
that
history,
but
we
can
learn
from
it
going
forward.
I
am
dismayed
by
linking
to
black
lives
matter.
T
U
It's
unfortunate
that
Eric
and
best
roofer
do
not
see
the
value
of
preserving
their
house.
It's
unfortunate
that
the
potential
developers
do
not
see
the
value
of
preserving
the
house.
We
believe
George
Rupert,
the
former
owner,
saw
the
potential
of
the
house
and
would
have
wanted
it
preserved.
It's
been
mentioned
that
George
Rupert
did
not
want
the
house
nominated
I
want
to
speak
to
the
character
of
Keith
Cochran.
U
Who
is
denominator
for
the
Ewalt
house,
I'm
glad
it
was
clarified
that
he
indeed
did
not
make
a
lowball
offer
on
the
house
because
he
did
not
I
have
known
Keith
the
entire
time
I've
been
in
Lawrenceville
about
35
years,
he's
the
most
honest
and
sincere
person.
I,
know
I
believe
when
he
said
he
and
the
late
Carol
Peterson
had
conversations
with
George
referred
about,
preserving
and
nominating
the
house
according
to
Keith.
George
was
very
proud
of
the
house
and
wanted
it
preserved.
He
walthaus
appears
to
be
in
fair
and
stable
condition
from
the
outside.
U
It
has
not
been
extremely
altered.
The
original
masonry
openings
for
the
windows
have
not
been
altered.
Yes,
some
work
needs
to
be
done,
woodwork,
repair,
masonry,
cleaning
and
pointing
new
windows.
All
this
is
doable.
I
was
incited
over
a
year
ago,
and
the
interior
had
a
lot
of
its
original
interior
architectural
fabric
still
in
place
very
distinctive
trims,
original
doors
and
a
pretty
amazing
curving
staircase
going
up
to
the
upper
floors.
We
all
realize
these
are
difficult
times
with
a
lot
of
complicated
issues
that
need
a
media
attention.
U
U
The
perspective
developers
have
stated
they
have
no
intention
of
renovating
or
restoring
the
house,
they
want
it
torn
down
and
it
came
up
and
boning
that
we
did
come
up
with
a
plan
that
showed
three
townhouses
in
lieu
of
the
five
that
they
want
to
shoehorn
in
there,
but
we
never
ever
stated.
We
wanted
to
house
torn
down,
we
were
trying
to
fight
the
zoning
battle
and
we
still
are
our
zoning
hearing.
U
The
ruling
on
the
zoning
hearing
is
still,
you
know,
being
appealed
and
we're
still
waiting
on
this
decision,
but
we
believe
the
house
can
be
economically
renovated.
There
have
been
a
couple
of
interested
parties
wanting
to
buy
the
house.
The
roofers
were
negligent
according
to
the
potential
buyers
and
returning
calls
we're
not
trying
to
deny
the
owners
the
right
to
sell
or
take
away
their
property
we'd
like
to
see
the
property
properly
marketed
to
so
a
sympathetic
buyer
can
be
found,
Lawrence
was
losing
its
historic
character
at
an
alarming
rate.
V
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
hi
I
am
Keith
Cochran
I'm
Lawrenceville
resident
I've
lived
in
the
neighborhood
about
40
years,
I've
renovated
and
restored
four
separate
houses.
There
I
the
historic
aspects
of
this
property
sort
of
speak
for
themselves,
and
it's
it's
undeniable
that
this
is
an
important
historic
resource
in
our
neighborhood.
It's
one.
V
Of
pre
Civil
War
houses
that
still
remain,
and,
in
my
opinion,
I,
don't
know
Maori
mansion
by
the
way,
which
was
I
think
was
noted
to
receive
historic
designation.
But
in
it
my
opinion
that
the
Ewald
house
is
is
possibly
the
most
interesting
and
most
important
of
the
handful
of
pre
Civil
War
houses
that
we
have
in
our
neighborhood.
V
That's
why
I
am
so
hoping
that
you
will
support
the
designation
I
wanted
to
talk
about
something
else,
though,
and
I
wanted
to
mention
the
what
is
happening
in
the
in
our
neighborhood
in
terms
of
development
and
I.
Think
everybody
is
aware
that
there's
pressure
on
our
neighborhood
from
developers
wanting
to
take
advantage
of
this
tremendous
boom
in
the
real
estate
market.
Those
of
us
who
have
been
in
Lawrenceville
for
a
long
time
have
our
doubts
about
the
effect.
All
of
this
rapid
development
is
having
on
your
neighborhood.
V
We
watch
original
neighborhood
neighbors
being
forced
to
leave
because
of
higher
taxes
and
opportunities
to
make
a
huge
profit
on
selling
the
property
that
only
in
the
past
10
years
has
at
minimum
quadrupled
in
value.
So
many
folks
have
moved
on
and
really
who
can
blame
them.
The
neighborhood
is
in
overdrive
from
a
development
and
construction
perspective.
We
are
now
considered
one
of
the
most
desirable
neighborhoods
in
Pittsburgh
super
hyped
in
magazines,
real
estate
promotions
and
development
opportunities.
Every
precious
green
space
that
we
had
is
now
being
built
upon.
V
W
V
V
Due
to
this
phenomenon,
we
are
no
longer
an
affordable,
neighborhood
and,
ironically,
the
sad
trend
is
to
demolish
small
original
historic
houses
which
could
be
renovated
and
still
be
affordable.
With
these
supercharged
cheaply
built
suburban
townhomes
that
make
lots
of
money
for
the
developers
market,
square-foot
rates
predominate,
the
rationale
for
new
planning
and
construction.
In
the
meantime,
lack
of
affordable
housing
has
become
a
huge
problem,
not
only
in
Lawrenceville
but
across
the
entire
city.
I
think
we've
really
blown
it
here.
V
Many
of
us
feel
that
the
designation
of
the
Ewalt
house
is
crucial
not
only
because
of
its
worthiness,
but
because
in
the
future
it
will
continue
to
be
a
property
that
represents
Lawrenceville
at
its
very
beginning
before
and
during
the
Pittsburgh
industrial
revolution.
We
have
so
few
properties
of
this
caliber
remaining
in
Pittsburgh
I
feel
that
in
Lorance
all
the
time
is
now
to
protect
this
land.
O
My
name
is
John
axtell
I
live
in
friendship,
I
moved
to
Lawrenceville
in
1982,
I
purchased
and
restored
a
house
on
Main
Street
in
1985,
which
I
still
owned,
I've
been
active
with
Lawrenceville
revitalization
and
preservation.
Efforts
continuously
for
close
to
40
years
I
urge
the
City
Council
to
concur
in
the
judgment
of
the
historic
review,
commission
and
Planning
Commission
that
the
you
old
house
is
worthy
of
protection
under
the
Pittsburgh
Historic
Preservation
ordinance.
O
I
urge
you
to
follow
the
appropriate
precedent
that
you
set
yesterday
with
the
designation
of
the
Mallory
house
is
a
city,
historic
structure.
The
owners
and
proposed
developers
of
the
old
house
have
raised
objections.
The
pittsburgh
preservation,
ordinance
based
on
property
rights,
grounds
and
objections
to
the
historic
and
architectural
significance
of
the
house
based
on
social
justice
concerns
their
objections
raised
a
series
of
questions
that
members
of
council
must
consider.
As
you
decide
how
to
vote
on
the
old
house
nomination.
O
Should
owners
be
permitted
to
opt
out
of
all
regulations
on
property
rights
grounds
should
abiding
by
zoning
standards
be
optional.
How
about
health
and
safety
rules?
How
much
have
the
sellers
invested
in
the
maintenance
of
the
property
since
they
inherited?
It
are
the
deteriorating
conditions
of
the
property,
the
result
of
failure
to
make
routine
repairs,
which
we
should
expect
all
neighbors
to
make?
O
Did
the
owners
use
a
licensed
real
estate
agent
was
the
house
list
marketed
on
the
multi
list?
Is
dense
commercial
development,
the
remedy
for
an
historic
wrong?
Are
the
owners
willing
to
back
up
their
words
about
social
justice
with
action?
How
many
units
of
the
proposed
replacement
row
house
development
will
be
made
affordable
to
those
with
modest
incomes?
Some
of
these
are
hard
questions.
O
Some
are
not
I
believe
that,
ultimately,
all
of
these
questions
can
be
resolved
to
support
the
fair
and
equal
application
of
the
Pittsburgh
Preservation
ordinance
to
all
structures
of
great
significance,
even
if,
as
a
memorial
to
past
wrong
once
again,
I
urge
that
City
Council
designate
the
Ewald
house
as
a
city,
historic
structure.
Thank
you.
Thank.
X
X
Please,
like
love
to
all
my
title
is
a
paella
I
am
Aborigine
American
I'm,
calling
in
today
to
shed
truth
to
the
ax
genocide
happening
to
our
people.
We
have
the
right
to
our
own
natural
resources.
We
have
a
right
to
travel
freely
upon
our
homeland.
We
have
a
right
not
to
be
taxed.
According
to
the
constitution,
article
1
section
2,
Clause
3,
where
it
clearly
says
excluding
Indians
not
taxed
to
be
taxed,
has
been
hit
in
many
different
forms
and
it
includes
being
evaluated
being
estimated
being
handled
being
charged
being
censured.
X
Our
land
is
historical
to
us
and
is
disappearing
for
the
sake
of
concrete
and
mortar
and
brick,
and
we
have
to
be
able
to
sit
at
the
table
when
these
things
are
happening
and
we
have
a
voice
to
be
heard,
as
these
things
are
happening
in
our
land.
So
it
is
very
important
that
there
is
communication
between
all
of
the
people
who
claim
to
honor
the
Constitution
and
who
claim
to
over
stand
the
truth
of
whose
land
this
is.
We
will
not
be
genocided
off
our
land.
X
X
Remedy
is
sought
out
in
conversations,
do
begin
to
happen
between
law
enforcement
and
other
agencies
that
we
are
at
home
and
we
have
a
right
to
travel
on
our
own
homeland
freely,
just
as
if
I
can't
come
into
anyone's
home
and
take
over
their
home
and
eat
their
food
and
use
their
natural
resources
and
then
make
them
go
out
and
work
for
me.
No
one
should
do
that
to
us
as
well.
Are
you.
W
Bill
Joyce,
Lawrenceville
I'm,
an
architect
with
considerable
experience
with
the
adaptive
use
of
historic
buildings,
including
several
National
Register
properties,
I'm
a
30-plus
year,
Lawrenceville
resident
by
removing
to
Lawrenceville
I
lived
in
the
central
North
Side
and
in
Manchester,
where,
as
a
young
architect,
I
developed
my
passion
for
Sorek
buildings
and
assort
urban
neighborhoods.
So
the
council
made
the
correct
decision.
Approving
the
nomination
of
the
maori
house.
Approving
the
iwo
house
is
even
more
critical,
as
Keith
Cochran
stated,
and
particularly
due
to
its
proximity
to
Butler
Street.
W
I
and
other
Lawrenceville
residents
have
testified
several
times
on.
Why
saving
and
reusing
a
walthaus
house
is
critical
to
telling
lawrenceville
story
to
future
generations.
I
want
to
use
my
remaining
time
to
refute
a
few
of
the
many
disingenuous
comments
made
by
the
rubrics
and
the
representatives
throughout
this
process.
Rupert
continued
to
refer
to
the
twenty
nineteen
microburst
Jimmy
Cohen
his
building
took
a
disastrous
hit,
is
in
fact
repairing
and
improving
his
building,
so
it
will
continue
to
contribute
to
Lawrence
those
historic
fabric.
A
chimney
crashed
through
the
roof
of
my
building
on
45th
Street.
W
We
tore
off
half
the
roof
structure
and
replaced
it
demolition
never
crossed
our
mind.
Drone
footage
of
the
elop
house
indicates
a
few
missing
shingles,
no
other
visible,
exterior
damage.
Mr.
Rosenberg
states.
He
is
a
contractor.
Well,
if
there
is
some
damage
fix
it.
As
the
chairperson
of
the
Planning
Commission
pulled,
the
roofers
condition
of
the
house
is
the
owner's
responsibility
the
owner
is
the
steward
of
the
house.
Rupert's
inherited
the
e
wealth
house
after
stating
and
writing
but
the
wood
they
would
not
demolish
the
house.
They
now
seem
to
be
interested
in
demolition.
W
They
are
not
city
residents
and
are
not
interested
in
issues
critical
des
Lawrenceville.
They
are
only
interested
in
maximizing
profit
by
selling
to
a
developer
and
opposes
to
demolish
the
evil
house
and
shoehorn
five
poorly
designed
townhouses
onto
the
site.
With
you
guessed
it
front,
facade
garages,
the
flawed
urban
design
feature
presently
being
reevaluated
by
City
Planning
appropriately
marketed
the
economic
viability
of
renovating
Neil
house.
W
In
today's
more
so
real
estate
markets
and
no
drainer
I
will
close
with
a
few
phrases
from
the
Rupert's
original
Zilla
a
description
of
the
elope
house
full
of
historic
details.
We
have
it
back
to
a
spectacular
historic
mansion.
Structurally
sound
just
needs
some
TLC,
don't
miss
out
on
this
one
of
a
kind
of
state.
Let's
do
the
right
thing
and
save
the
evil.
Y
Good
morning
councilmembers,
my
name
is
Anne
Davis,
a
20-year
resident
of
Lawrenceville
and
I
trust.
You
read
my
letters
submitted
to
his
pre
for
the
June
9th
meeting.
It
was
the
one
with
a
researched,
color,
sketch
I
created.
That
shows
how
he
walk
house
likely
appeared
in
its
earlier
years
today.
I
wish
to
invite
each
of
you
to
do
several
easy
things
before
you
cast
your
final
vote.
Y
First
look
up
Ewald
house
in
wikipedia
there's
a
complete
posting
that
was
created
by
someone
named
camera
fiend,
an
Albuquerque
New
Mexico
native
now
living
in
Delaware,
whose
main
interests
are
architecture,
historic
buildings,
music,
photography
and
local
topics.
Second,
please
take
a
drive
over
to
our
neighborhood
of
large,
so
take
a
slow
cruise
or
walk
past
a
walled
house
and
envision
what
it
was
to
the
generations
of
people
who
owned
it
socialize
there
or
started
their
lives
in
the
u.s.
Y
their
envision,
what
it
could
be
if
protected
by
historic
nomination,
enabled
to
be
purchased
and
preserved.
Third,
please
take
a
quick
look
at
my
June
9th
letter
again
and
the
picture
attached.
The
last
lines
is
my
letter,
read
I
humbly:
ask
that
you
envision
a
wall
house
as
I
do
dressed
up
with
right-sides
windows,
painted
trim
and
shutters
a
proper
porch
and
a
garden
and
most
important
an
owner
who
will
repair,
restore
and
ensure
its
preservation
inside
and
out
I
promise
to
be
among
those
who
will
concertedly
help
that
to
happen.
Y
If
you
grant
the
historic
designation,
evil
house
truly
deserved,
I
meant
what
I
wrote
and
wished
to
clarify.
I
am
willing
to
join
already
interested
others
as
a
significant
partner
to
purchase
you
up
at
a
fair
and
reasonable
market
worthy
rate
from
the
Ruppert
family.
Finally,
going
back
to
that
Wikipedia
posting
of
a
log
I
first
mentioned
it
will
soon
be
edited
and
I
invite
you
to
imagine.
Reading
this
Pittsburgh
City
Council
members
voted
to
approve
the
historic
nomination
of
be
Walt
house
in
July
2020.
Y
It
was
one
of
the
first
to
historic
homes
nominated
and
approved
following
the
July
8th,
2019
designation
of
Lawrenceville
as
a
historic
district
in
the
National
Registry
of
Historic
Places.
Oh
and
of
course
you
would
then
eventually
see
an
insertion,
hopefully
by
camera
fiend.
Whoever
he
or
she
is
of
a
new
photo
showing
off
he
will
most
handsome
and
restored
architectural
traits.
Thank
you
all
very
much.
Z
Okay,
hi
I'm
unmuted-
this
is
Melissa
mcswiggen
from
Point
Breeze
I
am
also
talking
about
evolve.
House
I
do
believe
it's
possible
to
allow
the
property
owners
to
sell
the
building
and
to
allow
Lawrenceville
to
retain
one
of
the
most
distinct
historic
properties
in
green
space
that
contributes
to
neighborhood
character
and
hears
and
adheres
to
community
planning
principles.
It's
not
one
or
the
other.
It
is
possible
to
find
a
suitable
buyer
to
pay
fair
market
value,
and
no
one
is
trying
to
exploit
blight
laws
to
get
the
property.
I
do
think
some
of
the
owners.
Z
Previous
comments
made
to
Council
were
a
shameless
appropriation
of
national
inclusivity
and
the
equity
conversation.
The
house
is
dated
to
around
1840
and
was
built
for
a
waltz
descendants
on
evil
property.
Samuel
D
Walt
died
in
1841,
as
was
mentioned
earlier,
according
to
the
free
at
last
website,
evil
did
own
two
slaves
until
1810,
the
property
owners
claimed
that
he
won't
exploited
a
loophole
and
own
slaves
after
the
abolition
of
slavery
this
month.
This
must
refer
to
the
1789
PA,
gradual
abolition
of
slavery
act.
Z
While
this
act
was
the
first
to
abolish
slavery
in
the
thirteen
original
states,
it
applied
only
to
children
born
into
slavery,
slave
owners
did
take
advantage
of
loopholes
until
1788
when
they
the
loopholes,
were
closed.
The
owners
lawyer
put
this
house
in
the
current
context
of
tearing
down
symbols
of
systemic
racism.
However,
the
house
is
scheduled
for
demolition
for
a
developer,
to
build
five
townhomes.
Z
It's
not
to
make
amends
for
injustice,
there's
more
to
the
story
than
a
vault,
including
the
various
people
that
actually
lived
in
the
house
like
Charles,
Bickle
architect
for
Kaufman's
department
store
and
Southside
market
building,
as
well
as
a
Williams
Anna's
er
a
local
politician.
It
also
has
various
polish
social
clubs.
In
the
20th
century,
the
nomination
has
been
positively
recommended
by
Lawrenceville
stakeholders,
Lawrenceville
United,
historic
review,
commission
Planning,
Commission
preservation,
Pittsburgh
and
architectural
historians,
and
is
a
contributing
structure
to
the
new
Lawrenceville.
Z
Historic
district
demolition
could
call
into
question
the
district's
integrity
and
government
grants
and
tax
credits
could
be
jeopardized
while
I
am
sympathetic
to
the
owners.
This
does
not
need
to
be
at
the
expense
of
Community,
Planning
and
Zoning,
a
national
historic
district,
neighborhood
character,
mature
tree
green
space
and
gentrification
concerns.
Thank
you
for
your
positive
recommendation
of
the
comparable
maori
addison
house,
and
I
hope
you
will
do
the
same
for
this
house.
Thank
you.
AA
We
are
not
to
be
assimilated
in
any
way
so
I'm
here
to
speak
about
what
that
looks
like
we
have
autonomy
over
our
own
health
autonomy
over
our
own
people,
autonomy
over
our
own
lands
and
our
own
waters
airs
in
our
aunt
and
our
own
resources.
What
is
happening
is
that
we
are
being
left
out
of
the
narrative
which
goes
against
the
Constitution,
which
goes
against
the
government.
The
government
agreement
that
we
have
that
is
mentioned
specifically
in
the
Fourteenth
Amendment
section.
AA
One
section
two
and
also
house
join
Congress
resolution
331
one
hundred
session
third
Congress,
which
states
that
they
have
made
atrocities
to
our
people
and
that
they
are
owning
those
atrocities
and
saying
that
they
could
never
repay
us
for
what
was
done
to
us.
So
we
are
here
speaking
to
be
acknowledged
so
that
we
can
be
at
these
come
in
these
conversations
we
are,
we
will
be
continuing
our
meetings
that
we're
having
with
policy
enforcers
and
politicians,
people
who
are
sworn
to
uphold
the
Constitution.
AA
We
are
here
in
a
peaceful
manner
and
we're
approaching
this
from
a
peaceful
perspective.
There
are
several
parcels
of
land
that
the
city
cannot
own,
as
according
to
the
city's
Charter
does
not
own
properties.
That
land
belongs
to
the
Aborigines.
We
are
here
to
establish
certain
parts
of
the
land
for
our
people
to
enjoy,
but
also
being
open
to
have
people
enjoy
this
land
as
well.
AA
AB
AB
Essentially
those
revisions
and
changes
make
the
ordinance
consistent
with
the
FCC
order
regarding
small
cells.
Those
are
mechanical
changes.
Nothing
really
for
council
to
consider
I
think
at
some
point.
The
law
director
will
address
that.
But
again,
the
intent
is
to
make
certain
that
the
ordinance
is
consistent
with
the
FCC.
What
are
relative
to
the
advancement
of
5g
technology
in
the
city?
I
want
to
thank
you,
councilman
Lavelle,
as
well
as
all
of
council,
for
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
this
process.
AB
It's
been
a
very
difficult
process
for,
as
I
said,
approximately
two
years
to
get
to
this
point
we
are
here
today
and
on
behalf
of
the
industry,
the
infrastructure
providers
as
well.
We
look
forward
to
working
with
the
city
to
promote
technology
and
promote
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
as
it
relates
to
5g
technology.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
AC
Filled
five
one
nine
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
Department
of
Finance
to
enter
into
a
license
agreement
with
McCormack
Baron
and
let
Salazar
Inc
to
allow
the
performance
of
site
preparation,
work
on
designated
city
property
in
order
to
facilitate
the
construction
of
Larimer,
East
Liberty
phases.
Three
and
four
choice:
neighborhood
development.
AC
W
Y
J
G
G
AD
G
Motion
to
approve
to
second
again,
I
think
all
the
members
for
the
participation
in
the
public
hearing
and
will
move
forward
with
the
administration
to
implement
this,
get
the
subcommittees
working,
get
all
the
people
together
to
all
participate
in
their
levels
of
expertise,
so
we
can
together,
unified
as
a
city
move
our
city
for
it.
Thank
you
very
much
much
for
this
a
moment
and
for
your
support.
Thank.
AC
J
AF
AD
AF
Members
of
the
telecommunication
industry
will
provide
testimony
and
feedback
based
on
those
documents,
with
the
hope
of
continuing
to
work
towards
a
resolution
with
the
city.
My
intent
here
today
is
to
share
with
you
a
bit
of
history,
about
how
the
federal
government
issued
an
order
around
process
and
fees
and
how
it
relates
to
the
fee
structure
and
ordinance
that
the
city
has
presented
in
September
of
2018.
The
FCC
issued
a
declaratory
ruling
and
order
relating
to
the
deployment
of
small
cells
in
the
public
right-of-way.
The
orders
of
intent
was
to
do
two
basic
things.
AF
The
first
was
to
standardize
the
siting
of
small
cells
and
reduce
regulatory
barriers
providing
shot
clocks
for
how
long
a
municipality
has
to
review,
permit
applications
and
issue
permits.
The
second
part
was
to
create
a
fee
structure
that
provided
guidance
on
what
a
municipality
could
charge
for
an
application
process
and
occupancy
of
the
public
right-of-way.
What
the
FCC's
ruled
was
that
a
municipality
could
not
charge
more
than
their
actual
reasonable
direct
costs
of
processing
applications
and
maintaining
derivative
way.
AF
Additionally,
the
FCC
estimated
that
two
hundred
and
seventy
dollars
purple
per
year
is
simply
is
presumed
to
be
an
actual,
reasonable
and
direct
cost
of
processing
applications
and
managing
the
right-of-way.
In
the
event,
an
espalier
exceeds
the
270
fee.
The
burden
is
on
to
prove
their
actual
reasonable,
indirect
costs.
The
FCC's
order
went
into
effect
in
nineteen
into
gave
municipalities
three
months
to
adopt
ordinances
that
align
with
the
order.
AF
The
city
of
Pittsburgh
is
currently
out
of
compliance
with
that
order,
as
the
fee
structure
is
either
a
five
percent
payment
of
revenues
received
on
the
infrastructure
or
five
hundred
dollars
annually,
fast-forwarding
to
2020
the
Department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
and
her
feminine.
But
innovation
presented
a
proposed
cost
based
fee
structure
that
charged
approximately
eleven
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
per
year
or
eight
hundred
and
eighty
dollars
more
than
what
the
S
see
estimated
was
reasonable.
AF
The
industry
provided
feedback
that
we
believe
that
calculation
of
the
fees
was
not
consistent
with
the
FCC
order
in
February,
both
departments
provided
that
revised
fee
structure
of
855.
Again,
the
industry
disagreed
and
requested
information
that
provided
the
city's
actual
cross
breakdown,
but
did
not
receive
it
in
late.
AD
AF
The
mayor's
office
reached
out
to
the
industry
for
assistance
in
finding
a
resolution,
negotiate
the
speech
structure
and
continued
the
build
of
wireless
infrastructure
in
a
city
to
improve
connectivity.
The
industry
responded
with
a
two-page
memorandum
of
understanding
on
April
6
that
proposed
giving
the
city
a
20
month
window
to
assess
their
actual
and
direct
costs
associated
with
the
application
process
and
maintaining
the
right-of-way
and,
in
the
interim,
we'd
pay
a
$500
annually
per
new
poll.
Additionally,
in
the
memorandum
we
provided
language
that,
in
the
event,
the
FCC
order
was
overturned.
AF
AG
Morning,
I'm
Harun,
Rash's
senior
counsel
for
regulatory
affairs,
4x
net
Systems,
Inc
excellent,
has
a
vested
interest
in
this
proceeding
because
we
build
maintain
and
lease
out
small
wireless
facilities
to
wireless
providers.
We
have
many
facilities
here
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
today,
I'll
be
addressing
the
legal
basis
for
municipal
charges,
for
small
wireless
facilities
in
the
public
right
of
way
and
on
municipal
facilities
in
the
right
of
way.
AG
Let
me
be
clear
up
front
municipal
municipalities
are
entitled
to
compensation
for
management
in
the
public
rights-of-way
pursuant
to
section
253
C
or
the
Federal
Telecommunications
Act
of
1996
such
competition
sums.
Compensation
must
be
fair
and
reasonable.
Unfortunately,
Congress
failed
to
define
fair
and
reasonable
further
section.
332
of
the
Act
requires
that
municipalities,
rules
and
regulations
shall
not
prohibit
or
have
the
effect
of
prohibiting
the
provision
of
personal
wireless
services
courts
around
the
nation
have
grappled
with
this,
and
so
has
the
FCC
in
2018.
AG
The
FCC
chose
to
issue
guidance
on
what
is
fair
and
reasonable
in
the
context
of
small
wireless
facilities
and
found
that
presumptively,
fair
and
reasonable
compensation
is
an
amount
equal
to
or
less
than
270
dollars
per
small
wireless
facility
per
year
for
all
recurring
fees,
including
attachment
to
miss
lis
own
structures
in
the
right-of-way.
However,
recognizing
that
city's
costs
can
vary,
the
FCC
also
found
that
a
municipality
can
charge
more
than
270.
AG
If
that
municipality
can
demonstrate
that
its
fees
are
one
a
reasonable
approximation
of
costs
to
those
costs
themselves
are
reasonable
and
three
they
are
non-discriminatory.
The
FCC
also
found
that
gross
revenue
and
municipal
profits
are
not
reasonable
approximation
of
costs.
If
a
city
chooses
to
set
rates
greater
than
270,
the
city
should
engage
in
a
cost
study
conducted
by
an
independent
auditor
accounted
similar
to
that
often
required
of
rate
of
return
utilities
to
justify
reasonable
approximations
of
reasonable
costs.
AG
While
the
CiCi's
order
is
on
appeal,
a
stay
of
the
order
was
declined
and
the
order
remains
lawful
and
presumptively
valid.
Further
guidance
on
fair
and
reasonable
compensation
is
provided
by
the
20-some
states
that
have
passed
legislation
that
set
compensation
for
small
wireless
facilities
below
the
FCC's
270
threshold,
often
way
below
here
in
Pennsylvania,
pending
HB
1,400
would
set
compensation
at
$100
per
small
wireless
facilities.
All
parties
agree
that
the
city
may
require
fair
and
reasonable
compensation
for
telecommunications
providers
for
manager
in
the
public
right-of-way,
but
that
level
of
competition
compensation
must
be
lawful.
AH
Yes,
hi,
my
name
is
Michael
Bondi
I'm,
a
real
estate
manager
for
a
Verizon,
Wireless
and
I'd
like
to
speak
on
the
proposed
fees
for
small
cell
facilities
in
the
right
away.
AH
Following
up
on
what
the
previous
speaker
said,
the
FCC
has
stated
that
any
cost
for
small
wireless
facilities
in
the
right-of-way
must
be
a
reasonable
approximation
of
the
city's
actual
cost.
As
mentioned,
we
have
requested
several
players.
The
industry
have
requested
a
detailed
breakdown
of
the
estimated
eight
hundred
and
fifty
dollar
cost
that
the
city
has
proposed.
AH
We
haven't
been
given
that
breakdown,
but
we
were
given
a
high
level
line
item
cost
of
that
and
I'd
like
to
address
a
few
of
those
items
right
now
to
to
show
how
we
feel
that
the
costs
aren't
a
reasonable
approximation
of
the
same
actual
cost.
One
of
those
is
a
line
for
two
telecom
inspectors.
They
propose
that
we
expect
to
have
to
approximately
2,000
small
cells
in
the
right-of-way.
When
all
said
and
done
for
all
the
carriers
for
two
telecom
inspectors.
AH
That
would
mean
each
inspector
needs
to
inspect
only
four
poles
per
day
with
one
telecom
inspector
at
full
load
of
small
cells.
It
would
only
be
8
out
8
small
cells
per
day
or
one
per
hour
that
need
to
be
inspected,
so
we
feel
that
there's
no
need
for
more
than
one
telecom
inspector.
That's
one
wide
item
that
we
feel
is
not
accurate.
AH
The
second-
and
this
is
the
largest
part
of
the
855
dollar
proposed
cost-
is
that
the
city
has
claimed
that
their
actual
cost
to
maintain
poles
in
the
right-of-way
is
$400
per
pole
per
year
at
$400
per
pole
per
year.
That
would
mean
a
total
pole
maintenance
budget.
The
city
claims
they
have
60,000
poles
know
right
away.
That
would
mean
a
total
budget
of
24
million
dollars.
AH
Only
for
pole,
maintenance,
I,
don't
believe
the
entire
budget
for
the
department
of
ability,
the
infrastructure
approaches,
24
million
and
there's
clearly
no
line-item
of
24
million
dollars
for
pole
maintenance
in
there.
So
those
two
things
are
just
to
demonstrate
how
we
don't
think
that
the
cost
of
the
proposed
are
accurate
or
represent
representation
of
the
city's
actual
cost.
So
while
we
do
want
to
see
the
amendments
to
chapter
427
passed
with
the
small
modifications
that
mr.
Cortes
recommended
earlier,
we
do.
AH
J
J
AI
You
very
much
councilman.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
sir?
Thank
you,
Pittsburgh
is
losing
to
Cleveland.
Pittsburgh
is
losing
to
Cincinnati.
I
will
explain
these
sad
facts
momentarily,
but
first
let
me
go
back
to
another
time
when
Pittsburgh
was
losing
a
time
when
a
generation
of
Pittsburgh
families
were
devastated
by
the
collapse
of
the
American
steel
industry.
Now,
you've
all
told
this
story,
as
well
as
the
story
of
the
great
comeback
that
followed
a
renaissance
born
of
technology
and
innovation.
AI
Well,
the
next
step
to
continue
this
Renaissance
for
Pittsburgh
is
to
become
a
fully
functioning
5g
city.
However,
the
measure
before
you
prevents
that
it
is
likely
the
capital
expense
budgets
for
carriers
are
set
for
2021
nearly
set
for
2022
and
Pittsburgh
is
going
to
see
the
needed
groundwork
for
5g
because
of
this
measure.
If
you
vote
for
this,
you
are
voting
for
that,
but
full
navel
Pittsburgh
become
a
truly
smart
city,
improve
communications
for
engaged
citizens
for
firefighters
and
for
police.
AI
The
ability
to
control
traffic
water,
runoff
waste
issues
even
deploy
driverless
cars
in
the
safest
way
possible
all
denied
by
a
measure
that
is
so
far
outside
of
the
fee
structure
authorized
by
the
FCC
that
it
is
likely
to
end
in
the
cost
of
litigation.
This
after
you
already
hired
an
outside
consultant
for
a
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
to
draft
small
legislation
without
success,
would
not
that
money
be
better
spent
on
closing
the
digital
divide
for
the
purchase
of
devices.
AI
AI
There
is
another
way
we
believe
it's
time
for
council
to
intervene
and
check
the
math
with
council,
the
industry
and
the
administration
working
together.
Surely
we
can
find
a
solution
that
will
allow
the
innovators
who
remade
this
city
to
find
new
ways
to
use
advanced
wireless
technology
to
continue
Pittsburgh's
wave
of
innovation,
and
that
will
how
close
the
digital
divide
by
providing
opportunity?
AI
One
final
note:
we
speak
proudly
and
often
of
the
brilliant
minds
graduating
from
Carnegie
Mellon,
University
of
Pittsburgh
and
the
region's
other
Institutes
of
higher
learning,
and
we
talk
about
ways
to
keep
them
here
in
Pittsburgh,
but
to
these
graduates
who
wish
to
work
in
these
new
innovative
areas
created
by
5g,
you
were
saying
head
west,
young
man
and
woman
to
Ohio.
You
see,
Cleveland
put
in
place
policy
to
welcome
investment
in
5g,
Cincinnati
actually
began
issuing
the
permits
during
the
pandemic.
Richburg
is
not
Pittsburgh
is
about
to
lose
to
Cleveland
and
Cincinnati.
J
J
M
L
AJ
J
AC
488
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
Public
Safety,
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
enter
into
a
grant
agreement
with
the
Pennsylvania
auto
theft
prevention
authority
for
the
purposes
of
receiving
grant
funds
in
the
amount
of
248,000
$476.
That
will
be
used
to
establish,
coordinate
and
fun
activities
to
prevent,
come
back
and
reduce
final
death.
J
J
J
AC
G
AC
AE
Know
I
figured
somebody
else
might
have
something
to
say
about
this,
but
you
know:
I
did
talk
to
Joe,
Cortez
and
I
also
spoke
with
Jim
Penha
about
this.
You
know
I
feel
almost
like
the
city
at
this
point
is,
like
you
know,
we're
kind
of
calling
their
bluff,
and
my
fear
is
my
concern.
Is
that
they're
holding
a
full
house,
so
you
know
and
I'm
scared.
It's
gonna
get
caught
up
in
litigation
and
I'm
scared
that
you
know
they're
not
going
to
go
for
the
850.
AJ
You
yeah
I
just
had
the
same
similar
questions
as
if
they're
willing
to
go
for
$500.
Why
are
we
going
to
spend
our
money
on
going
to
court
and
possibly
losing
money
I'd
like
to
get
an
opinion
from
the
law
department
before
Tuesday,
because
what
we're
hearing
is
other
cities
have
done
it
like
I,
believe
Columbus
tried
this
and
they
went
to
880
dollars.
AJ
A
pole
opposed
to
500,
so
I
don't
know
if
anybody
from
laws
on
the
line,
but
if
the
law
department
can
get
us
an
opinion
as
to
whether
this
is
legal
or
you
know
we're
going
to
spend
all
of
our
money
over
the
next
two
years
in
a
week
battle
that
we
get
no
money
to
hire
two
new
employees
that
we
have
no
idea
what
they're
actually
going
to
do
so
I'd
like
to
hear
from
lob,
if
not
today,
by
end
of
the
week
or
by
next
Tuesday,
before
final
vote.
So
that's
all.
Thank
you.
AJ
J
AK
Can
I
can
speak
briefly?
Just
on
that
point
again,
we
drafted
the
fee
schedule
in
consultation
from
Dan
Cohen
from
Cohen
Law
Group,
who
has
expertise
in
the
telecommunications
arena
and
is
also
part
of
the
so
his
very
attuned
to
the
FCC
order
and
and
those
developments
and
we've
also
been
working
with
the
with
the
law
department.
AK
Again
without
being
a
lawyer,
but
part
of
the
issue
of
negotiating
to
a
500
dollar
amount
is
that
precisely
we
came
up
with
the
850
based
on
fixed
cost
that
the
city
would
experience
based
on
the
number
of
employees
that
we
would
take
to
process.
The
original
number
that
they
communication
companies
provided
to
us
was
between
3,000
and
5,000,
small
cell
antennas
and
the
fixed
cost
that
the
city
will
incur
includes
day
very
expensive,
permitting
system
that
the
city
invested
in
a
computer
Onix
cartograph,
which
is
our
asset
management
system,
our
GIS
system.
AK
So
there's
certain
causes
that
us,
by
virtue
of
being
a
larger
city,
need
to
invest
that
a
lot
of
the
smaller
cities
that
the
270
is
based
on
do
not
need
to
incur
in
and
those
basic
cause
are.
The
things
that
we
put
into
the
850
when
you
take
$500
you're
doing
it
without
the
rationale
of
the
cost
you're
just
negotiating,
and
this
is
part
of
what
we
told
they,
the
telecommunications
providers
is.
AK
AJ
The
oh
sorry,
director,
right
just
to
jump
in
I
I
understand
that
part,
but
if
there's
a
ruling
from
the
FCC
we're
gonna
have
to
go
up
against
that
in
court.
So
that's
going
to
cost
us
money.
I
mean
these
companies
that
are
talking
I
mean
they
have
a
lot
of
money
that
they're
willing
to
spend
to
take
us
to
court,
so
I'm
just
worried
of
the
risk
that
we're
gonna
have
to
incur,
and
then
also
about
hiring
more
people
in
these
departments.
AJ
You
know
right
now,
when
we're
looking
at
a
loss
of
revenue
over
a
year,
we're
gonna
hire
people
that
are
going
to
technically
tell
us
what's
going
on
the
polls.
You
know
I
think
when
we
come
down
to
the
basic
necessities
that
we
need.
If
we
want
five
G
in
the
city
and
I,
don't
necessarily
know
these
companies
are
right
or
wrong,
but
if
they're
gonna
take
us
to
court
and
sort
of
drag
the
system
out
a
little
bit,
why
would
they
come
to
Pittsburgh?
AJ
Sooner
I
mean
it
ultimately,
they're
gonna
put
everything
in
we're,
not
gonna
install
this
ourselves,
so
we
need
them
to
support
us.
Now
I
wasn't
in
any
negotiations,
I'm
just
sort
of
trying
to
figure
this
out
that
we're
willing
to
go
to
court
over
a
couple
years
and
look
Council.
We
go
to
court
when
we
believe
there's
a
fight
needed,
but
if
there's
something
simple
to
get
5g
up
and
running
as
quick
as
we
can.
AD
AJ
More
my
concern
than
the
technical
concern
as
to
what
you
want
to
get
out
of
an
extra
$300,
a
cell
when
I,
don't
know
what
that
bottom
line
is
but
you're
saying.
Even
if
we
get
that
money,
it's
gonna
go
right
out
the
door
and
we're
gonna
lose
money.
Anyways.
Is
that
right,
so
that
eight,
so
we
actually
need
$1,000
a
poll.
What's
your
ideal
number,
there's.
AK
AK
AL
AL
Little
more
context
around
this.
Currently
we
already
have
several
hundred
small
cells
out
in
the
city.
Now
you
know
pretty
much
on
a
monthly
basis.
The
Department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
receives
additional
applications
from
the
telecommunications
providers
to
bring
this.
As
long
as
we
have
consumers
in
this
city,
which
we
most
certainly
have
consumers
in
this
city
phobia
to
serve
them,
so
I
think
a
little
bit
is
bluster.
AL
If
I
can
say
fairly
to
my
colleagues
in
the
telecommunications
industry,
we
there
we
have
already
received
from
some
of
your
constituents,
concerns
about
the
location
of
these
small
cell
antennas,
so
small
cell
antennas
are
about
the
size
of
a
dorm
refrigerator.
They're
mounted
high
up
on
a
pole,
as
well
as
having
cabinets
down
at
base
level.
How.
AL
AJ
AL
It's
a
pull
attachment
well
councilman,
there's
very
little
review
going
on
right
now
because
of
insufficient
staffing.
So
if
your
constituents
came
to
my
department
today
to
say
I'm
concerned
about
aesthetics
associated
with
this
I'm
concerned
about
pole,
clutter
I'm
concerned
about
a
DA,
accessibility
and
concerned
about
public
health
I'm
concerned
about
digital
equity
I'm
concerned
about
any
number
of
other
issues
that
might
go
on
there
I'm
concerned
about
the
structural
integrity
of
the
pool.
That's
going
there
it's
you
know.
AL
AJ
AL
$50,
there's
$50
for
the
permit.
There's
two
things
going
on
$50
for
the
permit
to
actually
go
out
and
do
the
attachment
I
have
in
our
code.
Right
now
is
recurring
every
in
addition
to
that
initial
permit
to
go
out
and
install
it,
every
provider
has
to
have
a
public
right-of-way
agreement.
That
is
a
requirement
of
code
that
they
must
have
to
continue
to
occupy
the
right
of
way.
They
must
have
a
right-of-way
agreement.
At
present,
our
code
only
provides
two
mechanisms,
which
is
one
of
the
bills.
AL
That's
in
front
of
you
today,
two
mechanisms
for
that
public
right-of-way
agreement
to
exist.
One
is
if
they
are
a
non-commercial
provider,
so
CMU
the
hospitals,
others
that
have
cellular
communication
systems
that
they
do
not
sell
the
use
of
to
others.
They
pay
on
a
linear
foot
basis
for
the
fiber
that
connects
those
small
cells
for
those
that
provide
commercial
telecommunications.
AL
They
pay
a
five
percent
local
gross
revenue
basis
that
works.
If
you
have
a
wired
address
that
that
bill
is
going
to
so
at
your
house
for
your
internet
today,
you
we
could
get
five
percent
from
the
telecommunications
provider
who
who
services
you
on
a
cellular
basis.
It's
really
difficult
to
distinguish
where
those
local
gross
proceeds
go.
So
there
is
no
real
mechanism
today
for
us
to
engage
in
those
right-of-way
agreements,
so
those
200-300
small
cells
that
are
out
there
today.
AL
There
is
no
local
right-of-way
agreement
for
them
at
all
in
2020,
because
we
can't
impose
this
five
percent
local
gross
revenue,
so
there
must
be
a
flat
fee,
so
that
piece
of
legislation
must
advance
I.
Don't
believe
that
my
telecommunications
friends
will
object
to
providing
a
flat
fee.
The
issue
is:
what
is
the
nature
of
that
fee?
How
much
does
that
be
so?
There's
two
different
bills
actually
in
front
of
you.
One
is
the
provision
of
the
flat
fee
for
small
cell
antennas
that
must
go
forward.
AL
AJ
AL
AL
AL
AD
AJ
AL
What
one
more
context
is
that
there's
actually
a
very
active
the
telecommunications,
the
FCC
is
actually
engaged
in
a
lawsuit
in
the
Ninth
Circuit
Circuit
Court.
Many
many
many
cities
have
brought
allegations
against
that,
alleging
that
the
270
dollar
figure
is
not
based
on
anything.
There
is
no
cost
study
that
was
done
that
arrived
at
that
270,
the
industry,
the
the
FCC
attorney,
has
in
the
most
recent
hearing
in
that
federal
court
case
has
acknowledged
that
that
270
dollar
fee
is
is
largely
baseless.
So.
AJ
AJ
AJ
AL
Right
and
we're
still
using
the
reasonable
cost.
So,
for
example,
the
city
of
Philadelphia
has
estimated
their
reasonable
cost
to
be
on
the
order
of
two
to
three
thousand
per
location.
Chicago
uses
about
five
thousand
per
location,
we've
estimated
our
reasonable
cost
at
about
two
hundred
and
fifty
okay.
H
It's
clear
that
270
is
is
not
at
least
the
case.
It's
been
made
to
me.
270
is
not
the
it's
not
based
on
any
any
kind
of
rational
figure
and
it
I
guess
the
only
one
question
I
wanted
to
clarify
with
either
director
Garces
director
Rex's.
So
what
I
heard
and
what
we've
discussed
previously
is?
It's
true:
is
it
true
that
the
FCC,
the
FCC
rules
say
that
once
a
fee
is
said
that
is
in,
but
it's
either
270
or
the
reasonable
cost
that
there's
not
really
room
for
negotiation
in
this
process?
H
AL
Don't
know
that
I
would
say
that
there
can
be
so
Columbus
has
made
a
policy
decision
to
subsidize
the
industry,
there's
no
requirement
that
we
must
charge
270.
We
could
make
a
municipal
policy
determination
that
we
do
want
to
subsidize
the
industry
and
go
lower
than
that,
or
we
can
make
a
policy
decision
that
we
should
recover
actual
costs
in
order
to
manage
this
system.
AK
You
still
have
to
justify
that
what
you're
charging
is
based
on
cost,
and
that
has
to
be
the
rationale,
because
at
that
point,
that's
where,
from
a
legal
standpoint,
the
strength
of
our
argument
in
court
goes
away.
We
are
not
basing
it
and
a
casa
I
think
the
director
Rix's
point
of
us
being
able
to
offer
a
discount
to
subsidize
a
development.
AK
I
mean
I
think
that
that
is
a
day
that
that's
not
for
me
to
say
whether
the
city's
policy
is
that
I
think
that,
precisely
due
to
the
budget
shortfalls
and
due
to
the
situation
of
the
city,
we
didn't
think
that
it
was
in
our
position
to
subsidize
the
development
of
private
companies
that,
in
some
cases,
are
already
charging
overages
for
plus
data
for
five
G
for
their
customers,
so
they're
getting
response
from
their
customers
and
I.
Just
think
that
it
is
appropriate
for
the
city
to
recover
its
cost
again.
AK
Most
of
the
development
of
de
small
cells
at
this
point
concentrate
in
more
commercial
areas
or
areas
that
are,
you
know
around
the
stadiums
around
downtown
Oakland.
They
subside
commercial
parts
in
Carson
Street.
So
we
just
figured
that,
especially
because
at
this
point
they
did
deployment
does
not
seem
to
cover
everywhere
in
the
city
that
we
would,
but
it
was
not
the
right
policy
decision
to
subsidize
the
carriers.
Thank.
H
You
and
I'll
just
say
two
more
things:
one
I've
gotten
a
few
calls
already
from
constituents
who
are
worried
about
their
property
values
are
worried
about.
You
know:
accessibility
on
sidewalks
because
of
these
that
are
already
being
put
up
and
there's
literally
no
appeal
process.
Our
Commission
approves
it
there's
no
appeal
process
right
now.
H
They
have
not
been
looked
into
this
there's
no
recourse,
so
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
figure
out
some
sort
of
position
that
coordinates
the
placement
of
these
so
that
it
can
go
down
the
street
rather
than
right
in
front
of
someone's
home
or
etc
etc.
Like
I
think
that
needs
to
happen
because
we're
all
gonna
start
to
get
calls
like
this.
Second
I
just
am
pretty
tired
of
this
rhetoric
that
pits
cities
against
other
cities.
H
Uber
has
done
it
with
us.
Uber
promised
us
Keenen.
We
gave
them
everything
that
they
wanted,
and
then
we
didn't
get
the
data
in
return.
Amazon
did
that
when
they
were
trying
to
locate
their
their
2.0,
the
amazon,
2.0
the
location
and
hidden
cities,
again
cities
and
you
had
to
fight
for
having
an
amazon
location.
H
Here
we
got
nothing
for
that,
so
this
premise
that
we're
fighting
for
services,
which
are
crucial-
which
I
think
are
actually
essentials
these
days-
that
we
see
in
education
and
we've
seen
and
you
know-
for
the
digital
divide
that
are
crucial
services
these
days
and
we're
fighting
against
other
cities
or
that's
being
it's
being
presented
to
us
that
were
being
pitted
against
the
likes
of
Columbus
and
Cleveland
I'm,
really
tired
of
that
rhetoric.
So
just
for
the
record,
thank
you.
F
J
AM
Thank
You
councilman,
so
I
am
been
skeptical
of
live
G
and
all
the
small
cells
when
we
started
this
conversation
years
ago,
with
the
distributed
antennas
being
deployed
in
both
private
property
and
rights-of-way
I've
been
trying
to
follow
along
the
5g
debate
nationally.
You
know
to
the
best
of
my
ability,
I'm
glad
to
see
that
and
I'm
supportive
that
we
have
priced
out
the
actual
cost.
I
am
alarmed
by
the
kind
of
smart
city
infrastructure
that
I've
seen
already
I
have
had
complaints
from
constituents.
AM
Council
members
will
probably
remember
a
modified
G,
but
a
smart
traffic
signal
that
was
put
in
on
Butler
Street.
That
was
named
by
residents
as
the
Festivus
pole
and
made
I
think
the
cover
of
the
city
paper,
because
it
was
so
large
and
obstructed
an
ad,
a
ramp
on
a
city
court
on
a
very
small
City
sidewalk
corner
and
it
we
had
to
have
it
moved
and
then
there
was
also
you
know.
This
is
again
I
mean
that
the
robotics
box
for
one
of
these
traffic
signals
is
bigger
than
a
dorm
refrigerator.
AM
We're
not
going
to
just
be
seeing
these
the
way
we
all
thought
of
you
know
cell
antenna
towers
when
there's
only
two
or
three
or
something
deployed
across
the
city.
These
are
going
to
be
deployed
into
thousands
am
I.
Am
I
understanding
this
correctly
director
Thank
You
director
X?
Yes,
and
so
they
will
be
everywhere.
You
won't
be
able
to
avoid
them,
and
so
we
do
need
to
have
standards.
AM
The
thing
that
really
actually
is
frustrating
to
me
about
the
federal
and
state
legislation,
the
way
I
understand
it
and
please
directors,
if
you
could
speak
to
this,
is
I
I,
see
it
as
pre-empting
local
authority
and
yet
another
example.
You
know,
for
example,
can
we
just
say
no
to
one
of
these
deployments?
AM
It
was
my
understanding
that
the
way
the
federal
and
state
legislation
was
drafted
is
that
we're
basically
there
that
legislation
is
overriding,
our
control
of
our
city,
property,
the
taxpayers
on
the
streets,
and
yet
the
federal
and
state
legislation
is
allowing
technology
companies
to
just
deploy
on
the
people
streets.
What?
If
what?
If
the
Pittsburgh
did
not
work
5g?
What
would
happen
director
X.
AM
So
you
know
I
think
the
reason
we
use
the
phrase
rail
roaded
is
because
the
federal
government
and
a
rail
roaded
over
local
municipalities,
literally
in
building
the
national
roads,
is
that
not
true
and
so
they're
kind
of
allowing
technology
companies
they've
just
given
them
a
free
pass
and
I
just
gonna
logically
object
to
that
as
well.
So
I'm
not
inclined
to
certainly
to
not
subsidize
the
technology,
companies
and
our
citizens
deserve
to
be.
AM
You
know
made
whole
for
you
know
the
amount
of
time
and
expense
it
takes
to
administer
this
this,
since
these
installation
so
and
to
permit
them,
should
say
so.
I'm
fully
supportive,
I
think
the
administration
and
yourself
directors
for
your
heart.
I
know
it's
been
a
very
hard
work
and
that
there
is
a
lot
of
pressure
by
paid
lobbyists
from
very,
very
big
industry
is
who
I
saw,
some
of
whom
you
know
are
very
personally
nice
people,
but
they
are
paid
to
say
the
things
that
they've
said
in
public
comment
today.
AM
J
J
W
C
AG
A
AC
Four:
ninety
ordinance:
it's
accepting
a
new
street
name.
Lucky
Lane
in
the
sixth
Ward
of
the
city,
ask
for
a
recommendation
by
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
addressing
Committee.
The
following
street
name
was
approved
by
CPAC
in
May
2020.
The
name
listed
in
this
ordinance
shall
be
made
official
in
accordance
with
Pittsburgh
call
title
for
public
places
and
property
chapter
420,
uniform
street
naming
and
addressing.
U
AC
491
ordinance
accepting
a
new
street
name,
skee-ball
Drive
in
the
14th
ward
of
the
city.
As
for
recommendation
by
the
city
addressing
Committee,
the
following
street
name
was
approved
by
CPAC.
It
made
2020
the
name
listed
in
this
court
and
she'll
be
made
official
and
accordance
with
it's
very
cold
title
for
public
places
and
property
chapter
420,
uniform
street
naming
and
addressing.
J
AC
AD
J
AC
AC
AM
AD
AM
AD
AC
AM
AM
Mr.
chair
I'm,
sorry
I'm,
madam
Clerk,
really
the
the
these
haven't
progressed.
We
are
still
tracking
them.
I
keep
mentioning
that
some
of
them
are
getting
close,
but
it's
hard
to
know
with
you
know
in
the
permitting
office
is
what
progress
we'll
make.
So
if
you
want
to
read
the
next
couple,
sewer
modules
together,
these
are
the
same
ones:
we've
been
singing
and
only.
J
J
I
our
bills
will
be
held
for
weeks
that
exhaust
our
agenda.
We
do
have
a
number
of
meeting
announcements
this
afternoon
at
5:00
p.m.
a
cablecast
public
hearing
is
scheduled
on
bill
for
47,
as
it
relates
to
adding
to
the
2020
November
general
election
ballot,
a
referendum
question
to
expand
the
powers
of
the
independent
Citizen,
Police
Review
Board,
so
register
to
speak.
At
today's
hearing,
please
call
the
City
Clerk's
office
at
4,
1
2,
2,
5,
5,
2,
1
3
8.
J
By
3:30
this
afternoon
you
may
also
submit
comments
via
email
at
the
City
Clerk's
office
at
Pittsburgh
faith
Council
has
scheduled
a
cablecast
post
agenda
and
public
hearing
on
bills.
404
405
4
6
&
4
10,
as
they
relate
to
to
stop
the
violence,
fun
and
policing.
The
post
will
be
next
Tuesday
July
14th
at
2
p.m.
and
the
hearing
will
be
next
Wednesday
July
15th
at
5
p.m.
Council
has
also
scheduled
a
cable
cast
post
agenda
and
public
hearings
on
police
reform.
J
Budgeting
for
the
following
dates:
postage
in
de
is
Thursday
July,
16th
and
Monday
July
27th,
both
at
10:00
a.m.
the
public
hearings,
will
be
held
a
teen
at
12
noon
and
include
a
July
21st
and
a
July
22nd
at
6
p.m.
is
there
any
other
announcements
from
members
seeing
none.
We
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
and
adjourn
the
meeting
so
moved.
Second,.